Abstract
Urbanization significantly contributes to soil contamination, and tourism-related activities may exacerbate the problem. Murree is a renowned tourist destination in Pakistan. In recent years, Murree’s contamination levels have increased due to growing tourism and rapid urbanization. This study was designed to evaluate the contamination levels and measure the natural radioactivity in the urban soils of Murree. In this study, elemental analysis of soil samples from the urban areas of Murree was performed using Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Emission Spectroscopy (ICP-OES) and an elemental analyzer, while the activities of naturally occurring radionuclides (NORMs) were measured using Gamma Spectrometry.. The concentrations of 26 elements were measured, and Ca (47,761 mg/kg) was found to have the highest concentration and while Sn (3 mg/kg) had the lowest. Various parameters, such as Enrichment factor, Geo-accumulation index, Pollution and Integrated pollution index, and Ecological risk factor were calculated to assess the soil contamination levels. These parameters revealed low to moderate contamination at most of the sites and high contamination levels at one site. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and correlation matrix revealed various sources for these metals. Non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic health hazards related to Cu, Pb, As, Ni, Cr, Mn, Ba, Zn and Co, exposure via three pathways (inhalation, dermal contact, and ingestion) were calculated for both adults and children; namely Average Daily Dose (ADD), Hazard Quotient (HQ), Hazard Index (HI) and Cancer Risk for Lifetime Exposure (CRLE). The highest HI value observed in adults was 0.023 for Ni and in children 0.207 for Co. Cr exhibited a carcinogenic risk for both adults and children, whereas As posed a cancer risk only to children. The average specific activities of Ra-226, Th-232, K-40 and Cs-137 in Bq/kg were 26.8 ± 14.4, 17.4 ± 5, 495.9 ± 82, 8 ± 3.2 respectively. Health risks associated with exposure to radiation from radionuclides were also assessed. The spatial distribution of heavy metals and NORMs were studied using interpolation to quantify their distribution geographically in Murree. This study concludes that some urban areas of Murree, near the city center are highly contaminated and the radiological risk to the population and environment is low.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Pollution is increasing, globally due to anthropogenic activities (Prakash and Verma 2022). Urbanization is one of the primary contributors to soil pollution which is more widespread in urban areas (Vareda et al. 2019). The elemental profile of soil is an important factor for the assessment and source apportionment of pollutants in an area (Ali and Muhammad 2023; Din et al. 2023). The presence of heavy and toxic metals in soil poses a severe threat to human health as well as a potential danger to terrestrial ecosystems. Due to their long lasting and cumulative nature in soil, metals can increase their toxicity by reacting with organic and inorganic matter. Heavy metals can harm living things including microorganisms, plants, humans, and animals through the food chain. Metals interact differently with soil depending on the physicochemical characteristics of soil, which varies throughout the world (Sarkar 2002; Tyler 1981; Zaynab et al. 2022). High levels of heavy metals in soil can lower crop yield by reducing microbial activity, impeding nutrient uptake and accumulation, and inhibiting crop root growth (Burges et al. 2015).
In addition to harming the brain and central nervous system function, heavy metal toxicity can also affect vital organs such as liver, kidneys, lungs etc. (Kuo et al. 2006). Long-term exposure to heavy metals may also cause conditions like Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, and muscular dystrophy (Bakulski et al. 2020; Gilani et al. 2015; Mahurpawar 2015). High exposure to heavy metals has been related to lung cancer, lung disease, and to respiratory system damage. Various methodologies have been developed to estimate the health hazards posed by these metals on human health (Hassaan et al. 2016).
Generally, urban soil is heavily contaminated with metals. This is due to emissions from vehicles, industrial waste, residential pollutants, and weathering of pavements, buildings, and automotive surfaces (Irshad et al. 2019). These pollutants are both directly and indirectly deposited on the soil (Ferreira et al. 2016; Tong et al. 2020). Heavy metals are also found in soil as a result of natural processes such as complex physiochemical reactions caused by weathering of parent rocks, oxidation, and mineral dissolution (Ghani et al. 2022). The migration of heavy metals from soil to water bodies has the potential to cause significant harm to both human health and the environment (Bhatti et al. 2022; Ghani et al. 2023). Long-term exposure to urban soil pollution poses serious health hazards and has a negative impact on soil ecosystems (Yuan et al. 2021). Urban pollution has gained a lot of attention in recent decades due to its adverse impact on the environment and human health (Yao et al. 2021). The levels of contaminants such as heavy metals correspond to population size and population-related activities (Barsova et al. 2019). It is consequently essential to monitor the concentrations of toxicants in urban soils to determine the severity of pollution in and around a specific area, establish control and remediation strategies, and provide a baseline for future studies (Muhammad 2023).
Natural radiation originates from two sources: cosmic radiation and radionuclide decay. Naturally occurring radionuclides (NORMs) include primordial radioactive elements in the earth’s crust, radioactive decay progenies, and radionuclides generated via cosmic-radiation interactions (Klement 2019). The half-life of primordial radionuclides is equivalent to earth’s age. 238U, 232Th, and 40K are radionuclides found naturally in soil. In general, NORMs contribute approximately 85 percent of the radiation dose to humans (Hendry et al. 2009). The activity concentrations of NORMs can be influenced by weathering, sedimentation, sorption, leaching, and subsurface water movement (Salbu 2006). 238U decays to 226Ra, which decays to radon gas 222Rn. Inhaling radon causes lung cancer. Ingestion or inhalation of Radium can cause lung, bone, and nasal passage malignancies (Substances & Registry, 1999). To determine the health hazards associated with radiation, the activity of NORMs needs to be measured.
Murree is a district of the Punjab province located northeast of the capital city of Pakistan. It is the most famous tourist destination of Pakistan and is also famous among international tourists. Due to the increasing tourist influx, Murree is urbanizing rapidly. Satti et al. studied the spatial distribution of radionuclides in some areas of Murree and found that the levels of radionuclides and stable elements at different sites were quite distinct. This suggests that the soil may be sedimentary shale. The area had high levels of silicates and alumina. There was a weak to mild association between the concentrations of major elements and radionuclides (Satti et al. 2016). Salim et al. studied heavy metal concentrations in some areas of Murree of varying altitude and discovered that the concentrations of Cd and Mn in soil and plant samples vary with elevation, with most heavy metals (HMs) being found in the mid-elevation zones of the Himalayan slopes (Salim et al. 2020). Dust, soil, and plant samples that have HMs in them have many sources. Generally Pb and Cd are measured in higher amounts, while other HMs contribute much less to the total HMs content (Salim et al. 2020).
Evaluating pollution levels in urban areas of Murree is crucial due to the high number of tourists it attracts annually, and the potential impact of heavy metals on human health and the ecosystem in this popular tourist destination. There have been no reported studies on the pollution level, radionuclides activity, heavy metals assessment in the soil and the associated health hazards for the urban areas of Murree. The objective of this study is to address this gap by providing a detailed elemental profile along with pollution indices, source apportionment and assessment of health hazards for heavy metals. This work also examines the activity of radionuclides and their potential risks to human health. In this work, soil quality of Murree was also assessed for microbial activity and plant growth. Moreover, statistical analysis tools such as principal component analysis (PCA) and interpolation using ESRI ArcGIS have been used to determine the spatial distribution of pollutants while correlation of various pollutants was used to quantify their potential sources.
Materials and methods
Description of study area
Murree is a district of Punjab located at Latitude 33° 54′ 30.24″ and Longitude 73° 23′ 25.08″ with an average altitude of 2291 m. It is situated about 35 km northeast of Islamabad. According to the Koppen climate classification, Murree has a subtropical highland climate with relatively cool summers and cold frosty winters with heavy snowfall. The temperature varies from – 10 °C in winters to 32 °C in summers. Average precipitation annually is 1904 mm and Murree also receives ~ 1590 mm of snow in a calendar year. Although the local tribes have been living in this area for centuries, the construction of modern Murree began in 1853 by the British Raj. English officers found Murree’s climate closer to their home because of its relatively cold meteorological conditions and established a permanent township here. Murree became a popular destination among British officers, and the trend continued after the Independence of Pakistan. Murree is the most visited tourist destination in Pakistan, and it is known as Malaka-e-Kohsar (Queen of Mountains). Due to its popularity as a tourist destination, Murree has seen a rapid rise in urbanization, which is more prominent in the city center and is spreading outwards with the construction of hotels, restaurants, and markets.
Sampling sites
Sixty soil samples were collected from Murree from fifteen sites, fourteen urban sites and one rural and relatively clean site at least 1km away from any population center. As can be seen from Table 1, the sampling sites are divided into three groups. Group-I includes samples from the urban sites situated away from the city center. Group-I sites are urban suburbs areas of Murree. These sites have hotels, restaurants, shops ranging from grocery shops to car repairs and some sites like S1 have seen a rapid rise in commercial apartments and residences. Group-II sites cover the major city center of Murree. Group-II includes all aspects of a vibrant city except an industrial area. To make a comparison, the sample in group-III was collected from a barren farm that is in a relatively unpolluted environment away from any road. Detailed sampling sites profiles are listed in Table 1. The study area map is given in Fig. 1.
Sample collection and pre-treatment
The soil samples were collected from a depth of 0–10 cm. To obtain uniformity in the samples, at each site 4 samples were collected within a radius of 10 m and mixed thoroughly. Each sample (~ 1 kg) was collected using latex gloves and a plastic scoop. The samples from each site were collected in labeled polyethylene zip bags to avoid any contamination. The samples were collected in March 2023, at the beginning of the spring season. The collected samples were then transported to the lab for pre-treatment and analysis. In the laboratory, the samples were air dried and then sieved using a vibrating sieve shaker. Homogenous samples were thus prepared for both elemental and radionuclide analysis. For natural radioactivity measurements ~ 100 g of each sample were sealed in identical bottles for 40 days to achieve secular equilibrium.
Sample digestion for ICP-OES
Before digestion, the glassware and plastic apparatus used in this study were soaked in 20% (v/v) HNO3 solution and then washed with de-ionized water. Four-Acid digestion (Lichte et al. 1987) was used in this study to determine the elemental composition of soil samples. One gram of sample was directly weighed into a 125 mL Teflon beaker. After the addition of 1g of soil, 5 mL concentrated nitric acid (HNO3), 5 mL concentrated hydrochloric acid (HCl), 15 mL concentrated hydrofluoric acid (HF) and 2.5 mL concentrated perchloric acid (HClO4) were added into the beakers. The samples were then placed on a hotplate at 190–200 °C and evaporated near to dryness. The beakers were then half-filled with 10% HCl and placed on a hot plate at 100 °C. The solutions were then removed, cooled, and filtered into 50 mL flasks once the residue had dissolved. Each sample then received one mL of boric acid (H3BO3; 50 g/L) to complex any remaining hydrofluoric acid that could otherwise cause deterioration of the ICP glassware in the sample introduction system. Finally, each extracted solution was diluted up-to 50 mL using 10% HCl and transferred to clean plastic bottles. ICP-OES was performed at the Plasma Spectroscopy Lab of the Central Analytical Facility Division (CAFD) PINSTECH Islamabad. All chemical reagents used for digestion were of analytical grade.
Instrumentation and quality assurance
The present investigation involved utilization of ICP-OES for elemental analysis. The specific instrument employed for this purpose is the ICAP 6500, manufactured by Thermo-Scientific, United Kingdom. The experimental parameters for ICP-OES in the present study are presented in Table S1. For Quality Assurance (QA) purposes, NIST 2710a Standard Reference Material (Montana Soil) was also digested along with the samples, and subsequent elemental analysis was conducted on both the SRM and the samples. The results obtained for the SRM were compared with the certified values by calculating the z-scores as given below:
where Valueexp is the experimental value for the SRM, Valuecer is the certified value and \({\upsigma }_{cer}\) is the uncertainty at 1σ given in the NIST 2710a certificate.
Criteria for reliability of the results, using z-scores, are:
|zscore|≤ 2, performance is considered satisfactory,
2 <|zscore|< 3, performance is questionable and.
3 ≤|zscore|, performance is unsatisfactory.
The z-scores for NIST 2710a (Montana Soil) obtained during this work have been plotted in Fig. 2. All the elements showed satisfactory performance except for Na, Sr, Zr and Li, which showed questionable performance. Therefore, the results for these elements have not been used in calculation of pollution indices and other parameters. The plotted values of percentage recoveries for each element from NIST 2710a SRM are given in Fig S.
For quantification of carbon, nitrogen, and oxygen the Organic Elemental Analyzer (CHNSO Flash 2000 Thermo-Scientific) was used. The choice of carrier gas was helium (99%), whereas the oxidation process was carried out using oxygen (99%).
Activity concentrations measurements of NORMs in soil were conducted using a high purity germanium detector (HPGe), Canberra model (AL-30). The detector was connected to a PC-based multichannel analyzer (Inter-Technique type pro-286e) through a highly sensitive spectroscopic amplifier (Ortec model 2010). The data acquisition process utilizes Inter-gamma version 5.03 software. The resolution of the system is 1.9 keV for the peak corresponding to the energy of 1332.5 keV generated by Co-60. Soil standards SO0103, SO0309 and SO0303 were used to calculate the activity of NORMs in the soil samples by comparative method. These standards were provided during Quality Assurance Programme (QAP) conducted by the Department of Energy (DOE), USA from 1998 to 2004 (Siddique et al. 2006). These are matrix matched standards. Each sample and SRM was counted for 57,300 s.
Pollution study
Soil contamination levels can be determined by utilizing different pollution indices given in the literature. In this study contamination level was assessed by calculating Enrichment Factor (EF), Geo-accumulation Index (Igeo), Pollution Index (PI), Integrated Pollution Index (IPI) and Ecological Risk Factor(ERF), details of which are given in Table 2. The background values used in this study are given in Table S9, calculated by Wedepohl (1995).
Health hazards
Risk assessment is a systematic procedure aimed at evaluating the probability of adverse health outcomes within a specified timeframe for a particular anticipated quantity. Each contaminant’s health risk assessment is often based on an estimation of the risk level and is categorized as posing either carcinogenic or non-carcinogenic health risks (Koller and Saleh 2018). The assessment of non-carcinogenic risks to human health involves evaluation of various factors, including the average daily dose (ADD) in mg/kg/day, hazard quotient (HQ), and hazard index (HI). These factors are considered for different types of exposure, namely ingestion, inhalation, and dermal contact (Zárate-Quiñones et al. 2021). The detailed profile for health hazards is given in Table 3.
Activity calculations
The activity concentrations of 226Ra and 232Th were calculated using the photo-peaks of their daughters, i.e. for 214Pb 351 keV, for 214Bi 609 and 1120 keV and for 228Ac, 911 keV. Photo-peaks at 662 keV and 1460.8 keV were chosen for 137 Cs and 40K activity, respectively. The specific activities for 226Ra, 232Th, 137 Cs and 40K were calculated using comparative method (Wasim et al. 2016), using the standards SO0303, SO0309 and SO0301 (Siddique et al. 2006) with 21-07-2023 being the reference date.
Radionuclide hazard calculations
Radionuclides present two types of hazards: external and internal. The external risks were quantified using Raeq (Radium equivalent activity), Dout (Outdoor external dose), and Eout (Annual outdoor effective dose). The indoor risks caused by radionuclides were measured using Din (Indoor external dose) and Ein (Annual indoor effective dose). The carcinogenic risk of radionuclides was assessed using LCRin (Lifetime Cancer Risk for indoor exposure) and LCRout (Lifetime Cancer Risk for outdoor exposure), obtained using formulae given in Table 4 (Younis et al. 2021).
Results and discussion
The elemental composition of soil samples from 15 sites of Murree, obtained using ICP-OES and Organic Elemental Analyzer are given in Table S3. The average metal concentrations, in mg/kg, were found to be: Ca (47,761), Al (43,757), Fe (27,224), Mg (8193), Ti (2974), Mn (520), Ba (157), Zn (122.3), Zr (111.3), V (90), Cr (80.62), Pb (36.75), Ni (27.55), Cu (19.50), Co (9.39), As (5.6), and Sn (3.01) while the mean concentrations of P, S, C, N and O in mg/kg were 861, 259, 41,280, 6080 and 72,626 respectively (Table S3). Spatial distributions of Cu, Cr, As, Pb, Zn, and Mn are given in Fig. 3, plotted using interpolation method in ESRI ArcGIS. The As content in soil ranged from 2.27 to 8.93 mg/kg. Copper concentration ranged from 3.36 to 51 mg/kg and has low to moderate values for Group I sites and moderate to high values for Group II sites. Chromium levels ranged from 55 to 107 mg/kg and had no consistent trend. High Cr values were observed at certain sites from both Groups I and II. The Pb concentrations were high for Group II sites S11 (93 mg/kg), S12 (64 mg/kg), and S13 (141 mg/kg) located near the city center, and low to moderate for Group I sites. Zinc is present in higher amounts at S1 (226 mg/kg) and S13 (188 mg/kg). Higher levels of V, Co, and Ni were observed at the group-II sites in comparison to the city center (Fig. 4).
For comparison, the average elemental composition of urban soils of Pakistan, Islamabad (Daud et al. 2009), Gadoon Amazai (KPK) (Hussain et al. 2015), Hunza (Wasim et al. 2016), Sialkot (Malik et al. 2010), global average (Aleksonko 2014) and Murree (current study) are given in the Table 5. The mean concentration of Pb in the soil of Murree is comparatively higher than that of Islamabad, but lower than Sialkot, KPK, and the global average. The mean concentration of Chromium in (mg/kg) within the soil of Murree is found to be greater than the global average and Hunza, but comparatively lower than Sialkot, KPK, and Islamabad. The mean values of Zn in this work exhibit higher levels in comparison to Hunza, Islamabad, and Sialkot, although they are comparatively lower than those observed in KPK and the global average. The concentrations of Cu, As, Mn, Co, Ba, Ti, S, Sn, and P in the soils of Murree are comparatively lower than those found in other locations in Pakistan and the global average. Therefore, compared to the sites mentioned in Table 5. Murree appears to be a cleaner city for most elements.
The acquired data was examined using Principal Component Analysis (PCA). The sampling sites were divided into three groups (explained earlier), and PCA findings are nearly identical for each group as can be seen in the biplot in Fig. 5. Aside from S1 site sample, samples that were gathered outside of the city center are placed in PC1. Similarly, apart from S9 site sample, PC2 includes all the sampling locations inside or close to Murree City. S1 site, Kashmiri Bazar, is urbanizing rapidly, therefore its inclusion in PC2 is appropriate. However, S9 was obtained from GPO Murree, the city center, but it was placed in PC1, so S9 can be viewed as an outlier. This may be due to the replacement of surface soil in the flower beds along the roadside near GPO for better flower growth. The classification is further supported by the fact that PC2 sites have significantly higher average concentrations of several elements, such as Pb, Zn, S, P, and Cu, than PC1 sites do. The biplot in Fig. 5 demonstrates that the three elements Ca, Fe, and Al are primarily responsible for the highest elemental variance between the two Groups.
A correlation matrix was also obtained to link the elements together and find their possible sources. The correlation matrix for elements is given in Table S5. From the matrix it was found that the following sets of elements highly co-relate with each other:
Set 1: Al, Ba, K, Fe, Mg.
Set 2: Co, As, Cr, Ni, Ti, V, Fe, K.
Set 3: Cu, Pb.
Set 4: Mn, Ti, V.
Set 5: Zn, P, S.
All the elements placed in the above sets co-relate with r = 0.6 or more which show a strong correlation between them. Set 1 and Set 4 components Al, Ba, K, Fe, Mg, Mn, Ti, and V are naturally occurring elements in the earth’s crust and are classified as lithophiles, or “rock loving” elements. The weathering of rocks and minerals can cause the deposition of these elements in soil (Christy 2018).
The elements in set 2 are Co, As, Cr, Ni, Ti, V, Fe and K. These elements are grouped together because they are emitted during the burning of fossil fuels, particularly coal (Vouk and Piver 1983). Most of the people in Murree rely on burning wood and coal to heat their homes and for cooking during the chilly winters. Coal is also used in many commercial hotels. Since the advent of pipeline gas, this trend has been declining, but it will take decades for the government to fully supply the entire population with commercial pipeline gas, resources of which are also depleting. Therefore, the burning of coal and wood poses a significant environmental threat to Murree. Set 3 contains Pb and Cu. Leaded fuel is banned in Pakistan, but it has left an imprint on the soil combined with the fact that most of the vehicles use leaded paint which can be deposited on the soil via weathering (Del Rio-Salas et al. 2012; Mwai et al. 2022). Another source of lead is Pb acid batteries which are commonly used in most households, hotels and shops to supply backup power during electricity shutdowns and for storage. Cu is also released by automobiles and can be deposited on the soil via aerosol transport. It is also found in vehicle tires and in lubricating oil of motorcycles and cars (Ozaki et al. 2004). Pb and Cu strongly correlate with each other as their source is automobiles and vehicles. The grouping of Pb and Cu makes a lot of sense given that Murree is a well-known tourist destination and has overwhelming numbers of automobiles and vehicles passing through it every year. Zn, P and S are released during vehicular emissions and their grouping can trace their origin back to the tourist activities in the area.
EF, Igeo, Pollution and IPI, and ERF are all valuable indices for figuring out the pollution status of a site from anthropogenic activities. From Fig. 6a it is apparent that most of the elements have minimum enrichment. S1 (Kashmiri Bazar) has substantial Pb and Zn enrichment. Significant As and Cr Enrichment is found in S9 (GPO), S6 (Aliyot Bazar), and S8 (Lower Topa), respectively. Sites S11 (Kohsar University) and S12 (Jhika Gali) have notable Ca, Cr, and Pb enhanced concentrations. Quick lime (CaO), which is frequently used to paint roadside walls, eventually mixes with the soil due to weathering, is probably the cause of the Ca enrichment (Li et al. 2019). S13 is significantly enriched in Ca, Mn, Ni and Ti and highly enriched in Cr, Cu, P and Zn. Only S13 (Sani-Bank) exhibits extremely high enrichment in As and Pb. Significant Enrichment of As, is observed in S15. The results of Igeo are presented in Fig. 6b and show that most of the sites are clean or have very low pollution levels. The sites S1 and S5, S7, S9, S15 are moderately polluted in Zn and As respectively. Moderate to low levels of pollution in Cu, Ca and Pb are observed at S11 and S12 sites. High levels of Pb pollution are observed at S13, while it is also moderately polluted in As and Zn. The results of PI and IPI are presented in Fig. 6c and d respectively. The majority of these sites display mild to minimal levels of contamination. S5, S7, S9, S13, and S15 exhibit significant As contamination based on PI values. Significant lead contamination is evident in S11, S12, and S13. Locations S13 and S1 show high levels of Zn pollution, whereas S5 and S12 are impacted by significant amounts of Ca and Cr contamination, respectively. Based on the IPI values, it’s evident that majority of the locations show moderate pollution levels, with the most significant pollution found at S13. Figure 7 displays the Ecological risk factor values. ERF values are generally low for most sites, suggesting a low ecological risk associated with heavy metals. At S13 and S15, there is a moderate ecological risk from As and Pb.
The results of Pollution indices show that most of the sites exhibit low pollution levels, with a few exceptions such as S13 (Sani Bank). The majority of the polluted sites are Group-II sites situated close to the city center of Murree. These sites show high levels of Pb and As pollution, along with moderate pollution of Cu, Cr, Ca, Ni, and Zn. The significant Pb pollution levels are due to the weathering of lead paints and the impact of leaded fuel historically used. Furthermore, yellow and white road markings also play a role in Pb pollution (Fuge 2012; Ozaki et al. 2004). High concentrations of As, Cu, Cr and Zn are linked with atmospheric deposition of these elements on soil due to the burning of coal and wood during the winter season in Murree, emissions from heavy traffic and deposition of waste by hotels and tourists alike (Fuge 2012).
Diesel vehicles are widely used for the transport of goods as well as diesel buses are used as a means of public transport in Murree. Diesel soot contains elevated levels of Ni, Zn and As. The deposition of these metals from diesel soot to the soil explains their elevated levels at some sites (Vellingiri et al. 2022). Cr is found in large concentrations in peeling paintwork and anticorrosive treatments on automotive guardrails, which explains the high Cr values at S8, S11, and S13 (Oves et al. 2012). The moderate levels of Ca pollution can possibly be traced to the quick lime used to paint roadside walls, weathering, and erosion of which can elevate the levels of calcium in soil (Li et al. 2019). What is interesting here is that from Group-I, S1 (Kashmiri Bazar) showed elevated levels of pollution mostly in arsenic, lead, and zinc and S5 (Phagwari) has high levels of As, Cr, Pb and Zn because of transport related activities. Most of the Group-I sites are urbanizing rapidly to accommodate more and more tourists and tourism related activities which is apparent in Kashmiri Bazar’s case. At S1, leakage of sewage and dumping of waste near the road right in the center of the market is a cause for concern and is directly responsible for elevated levels of pollution at S1. The most striking result to emerge from the pollution indices is the presence of elevated levels of arsenic in S15. Since the soil from S15 was collected from an un-polluted site away from the road the presence of high levels of arsenic can have only one source namely poultry waste. Most of the local population near S15 site have domesticated chickens and use commercial chicken feed for their upkeep. Chicken feed contains arsenic, which can be deposited on the soil via chicken waste (Mondal 2020; Wallinga 2006). Hence, the high levels of arsenic at S15 can be explained by this argument. The above reasoning may also explain the high ERF due to Pb at S13 and As at S15. Sn was detected only at sites S1 and S13, possibly from burning of waste at both locations (Harper 2005).
Total organic matter (TOM) and carbon to nitrogen ratios were computed for the fifteen sites, and the results are presented in Fig. 8. Carbon to nitrogen ratios ranged from 2.6% to 15%, well below the 20–30% equilibrium range. The percentages of total organic matter ranged from 2% to 19.4%. Soil samples taken from locations S10 and S12 fall within the acceptable range for TOM. Most of the soil samples were found to be of low quality. Therefore, soil from these sites is not suitable for optimum crops or plant growth.
Health hazards associated with heavy and toxic metals
The mean concentrations of heavy and toxic metals in mg/kg are below the maximum allowed WHO values of these metals in soil (Ahmad et al. 2021). For both carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risks, health hazards were assessed for adult and child exposure to these metals.
Average daily dose was calculated for Cu, Pb, As, Ni, Cr, Mn, Ba, Zn, and Co for three exposure pathways, ADDING (ingestion), ADDINH (inhalation) and ADDDER (dermal). Table 6 shows the calculated values of ADD for the three exposure pathways, both for children as well as adults. The values follow the pattern ADDING > ADDDER > ADDINH for both adults and children. The highest dose for all metals in ADD of soil was found in ADDING and ADDINH for children, whereas ADDDER was greater for adults. Apart from Ba, it can be seen from Table 6 that all metals showed the following HQ trend in both adults and children HQING > HQDER > HQINH. Barium followed HQING > HQINH > HQDER in both adults and children. The Hazard Index (HI) values for Cu, Pb, As, Ni, Cr, Mn, Ba, Zn and Co are 0.3 \(0\times\) 10–3, 7.61 \(\times\) 10–3, 13.9 \(\times\) 10–3, 1.13 \(\times\) 10–3, 23 \(\times\) 10–3, 3.49 \(\times\) 10–3, 2.27 \(\times\) 10–3, 0.3 \(3\times\) 10–3, 20.8 \(0\times\) 10–3, for adults and 2.78 \(\times\) 10–3, 69 \(\times\) 10–3, 105 \(\times\) 10–3, 9.20 \(\times\) 10–3, 182 \(\times\) 10–3, 25.2 \(0\times\) 10–3, 15.4 \(0\times\) 10–3, 2.70 \(\times\) 10–3, 207 \(\times\) 10–3, for children respectively. The highest observed HI value in adults is 0.02 for Cr and in children 0.20 for Co. In both adults and children, the HI values for each metal were less than 1, indicating no appreciable health risk. However, children have HI values for each metal 8–10 times higher than adults. Higher hazard index values for children in Murree indicates an increased risk of non-carcinogenic health issues caused by heavy metals due to prolonged exposure. The carcinogenic risk to adults and children was calculated using cancer risk from lifetime exposure (CRLE) of metals and the values are given in Table 7. Cr posed cancer risk in both adults and children while As in children is above the limit of 1 \(\times\) 10–6 set by US-EPA (Irshad et al. 2019). Carcinogenic metals, such as Cr and its compounds, induce oxidative stress and contribute to the development of cancer. Exposure to Cr(VI) results in DNA epigenetic modifications, which in turn lead to genetic changes in gene expression and consequently cancer (Iyer et al. 2023). The total cancer risk posed by Cr in children is 3 \(\times\) 10–4 and in adults is 4 \(\times\) 10–5. However, it is unclear which oxidation state Cr exists in + 3 or the more toxic + 6. Therefore, the full extent of the danger to human health cannot be determined. This may be undertaken in future work given the higher amounts of Cr measured in Murree. The cancer risk value for As (4 \(\times\) 10–5) exceeded the threshold value for children only. Inorganic arsenic has a tendency to induce cancer, skin conditions, and neurological issues (Irshad et al. 2019; Mondal 2020). Children are therefore more vulnerable than adults to cancer risk, where ingestion, dermal and inhalation pathways respectively contribute to CRLE.
Radionuclides
Table 8 presents the measured activity values for Ra-226, Th-232, K-40, and Cs-137, expressed in (Bq/kg) for the reference date of 27-07-23. The measured activity concentrations of Ra-226 varied between 21.6 to 33.2 Bq/kg, with the lowest value observed at S1 site and the highest value observed at S4 site. The average value for Ra-226 is 26.8 Bq/kg, below the global average value of 32 Bq/kg for Radium. The maximum recorded activity concentration of Th-232 is 26 Bq/kg, at location S15, while the minimum recorded activity concentration is 12.1 Bq/kg, observed at location S1. The average activity concentration of Th-232 is lower than the global average. K-40 activities at the sites S15 and S12 are 629.4 Bq/kg and 383.4 Bq/kg, respectively, with S15 having the highest value and S12 the lowest. The mean activity concentration value of K-40 exceeds the world average, probably due to the higher altitude of these sites. Cesium-137 (Cs-137) is not naturally present in the environment, resulting in generally low concentrations in environmental samples. Cs-137 was detected at sampling sites S3, S9, and S15, with corresponding activity concentrations of 6.9, 12.3, and 4.8 Bq/kg, respectively.
PCA was again used for radionuclides. The biplot for radionuclides and sites using PCA can be seen in Fig. 9. A covariance matrix was established using the activities of radionuclides in soil samples. This matrix was then solved for eigen values and eigen vectors. The variance ratios for the newly formed variables (principal components) PC1, PC2, PC3, and PC4 are 0.51, 0.25, 0.13, and 0.09, respectively. Therefore, the first principal component (PC1) was found to correspond with the direction that exhibited the highest degree of variability within the dataset. The second major component, PC2, spans the direction of the second highest variance. Two principal components PC1 and PC2 were sufficient to describe the maximum variance. The linear combination of PC1 and PC2, with respect to the original variables, are given in the equations below.
The loading values obtained from PCA reveal that the primary factors contributing significantly to the observed variation in PC1 are the activities of Ra-226, Th-232, and K-40. Similarly, PC2 exhibits a significant correlation with Cs-137, as seen by its highest loading value of 0.96. The NORMs correspond to PC1 and Cs-137 to PC2. The correlation matrix established between radionuclides can be seen in Table S7. A moderate correlation exists among Th-232, Ra-226, and K-40 due to their natural occurrence. However, Cs-137, being of anthropogenic origin, does not exhibit any correlation with other radionuclides.
The spatial distribution of K-40, Th-232, Ra-226 and Cs-137 is given in Fig. 10. The assessment of the risk associated with radionuclides in soil involves the computation of radiation indices, which are presented in Table 9. The radium equivalent values exhibit a below-average trend as compared to the global values, with a mean value of 38.29 Bq/kg. The values of the outdoor hazard indices are also below the global average. The mean values for Dout, Eout, and ECLRout have been calculated as 43.58 nG/h, 0.05 mSv/y, and 0.18, respectively. The indoor hazard indices, Din, Ein, and ECLRin, have mean values of 83.5 nG/h, 0.41 mSv/y, and 1.35, respectively, which surpass the global average. Therefore, Indoor exposure presents a greater risk in the soil of Murree. The annual effective dose is lower than the standard limit of 1 mSv/y proposed by International Committee of Radiation Protection (ICRP) for general public (Ahmad et al. 2015; Eckerman et al. 2012). Overall, the hazards posed by exposure to the natural radiation from the soil of Murree are low, but constant radionuclide monitoring in the soil is suggested.
Conclusion
In this study, the pollution level assessment of urban areas of Murree was carried out along with the health hazards associated with exposure to heavy metals Moreover natural radioactivity was measured along with the health hazards associated with natural radionuclides. The possible sources of heavy metal were identified as the combustion of coal, automotive emissions, leaded paints, tourist activities, and natural sources. Pollution indices revealed that the sites near the city center are more polluted than the sites away from it. Ecological risk factor was low for most of the sites with moderate risk at S13 and S15 (Bhurban) posed by Pb and As respectively. It was found that the soils in Murree are of low quality unsuitable for optimal crop or plant growth as their carbon to nitrogen ratios ranged from 2.6 to 15, and total organic matter ranged from 2% to 19.4%. The highest calculated average daily doses for various metals in soil through three exposure pathways: ingestion, inhalation, and dermal was found in children’s ADDING and ADDINH, while ADDDER was high for adults. Children had higher HI values for each metal (8–10 times higher) than adults. It was found that only Cr in children posed a carcinogenic risk. The average specific activities of Ra-226, Th-232, K-40 and Cs-137 in Bq/kg were 26.8 ± 14.4, 17.4 ± 4.9, 495.9 ± 82, 8 ± 3.2 respectively. Health hazards posed by exposure from radionuclides were low and the effective dose per year was well below the standard limit of 1 mSv/y. The overall finding of this study showed that urbanization is leading to pollution of Muree’s environment. The exposure to Cr constitutes the primary source of health risks, with children being particularly susceptible to the occurrence of non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic disorders. Further research is needed to assess the long-term effects of urbanization on the health of the population in Murree.
Recommendations
Given the potential for bioaccumulation of heavy and toxic metals, it is recommended to government agencies and the tourism department to implement further measures to restrict vehicular movement in Murree. This can be achieved by imposing further limitations on the number of tourists allowed to enter the area and by introducing environmentally sustainable transportation options for both tourists and residents. Moreover, it is imperative to raise awareness regarding the proper disposal and burning of waste materials. The government should actively support the reduction of pollution resulting from the combustion of coal and wood through the provision of alternative solutions such as renewable energy. It is necessary to conduct a thorough investigation of cancer cases in the urban areas of Murree and determine the extent to which they may be linked to the consumption or exposure to heavy and toxic metals.
Data availability
Data is available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Ahmad N, Jaafar MS, Bakhash M, Rahim M (2015) An overview on measurements of natural radioactivity in Malaysia. J Radiat Res Appl Sci 8(1):1
Ahmad W, Alharthy RD, Zubair M, Ahmed M, Hameed A, Rafique S (2021) Toxic and heavy metals contamination assessment in soil and water to evaluate human health risk. Sci Rep 11(1):17006
Alekseenko V, Alekseenko A (2014) The abundances of chemical elements in urban soils. J Geochem Explor 147:245–249
Ali W, Muhammad S (2023) Compositional data analysis of heavy metal contamination and eco-environmental risks in Himalayan agricultural soils, northern Pakistan. J Geochem Explor 255:107323
Bakulski KM, Seo YA, Hickman RC, Brandt D, Vadari HS, Hu H, Park SK (2020) Heavy metals exposure and Alzheimer’s disease and related dementias. J Alzheimer’s Dis 76(4):1215–1242
Barsova N, Yakimenko O, Tolpeshta I, Motuzova G (2019) Current state and dynamics of heavy metal soil pollution in Russian Federation—a review. Environ Pollut 249:200–207
Bello S, Nasiru R, Garba NN, Adeyemo DJ (2019) Carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic health risk assessment of heavy metals exposure from Shanono and Bagwai artisanal gold mines, Kano state, Nigeria. Sci Afr 6:e00197
Bhatti ZI, Ishtiaq M, Khan SA, Nawab J, Ghani J, Ullah Z, Khan S, Baig SA, Muhammad I, Din ZU, Khan A (2022) Contamination level, source identification and health risk assessment of potentially toxic elements in drinking water sources of mining and non-mining areas of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pakistan. J Water Health 20(9):1343–1363. https://doi.org/10.2166/wh.2022.087
Burges A, Epelde L, Garbisu C (2015) Impact of repeated single-metal and multi-metal pollution events on soil quality. Chemosphere 120:8–15
Christy AG (2018) Quantifying lithophilicity, chalcophilicity and siderophilicity. Eur J Mineral 30(2):193–204
Daud M, Wasim M, Khalid N, Zaidi JH, Iqbal J (2009) Assessment of elemental pollution in soil of Islamabad city using instrumental neutron activation analysis and atomic absorption spectrometry techniques. Rca-Radiochim Acta 97(2):117–121
Del Rio-Salas R, Ruiz J, De O-Villanueva M, Valencia-Moreno M, Moreno-Rodríguez V, Gómez-Alvarez A, Grijalva T, Mendivil H, Paz-Moreno F, Meza-Figueroa D (2012) Tracing geogenic and anthropogenic sources in urban dusts: insights from lead isotopes. Atmos Environ 60:202–210
Din IU, Muhammad S, Rehman IU (2023) Heavy metal (loid) s contaminations in soils of Pakistan: a review for the evaluation of human and ecological risks assessment and spatial distribution. Environ Geochem Health 45(5):1991–2012
Eckerman K, Harrison J, Menzel HG, Clement CH (2012) ICRP publication 119: Compendium of dose coefficients based on ICRP publication 60. Ann ICRP 41:1–130
Ferreira AJ, Soares D, Serrano LM, Walsh RP, Dias-Ferreira C, Ferreira CS (2016) Roads as sources of heavy metals in urban areas. The Covões catchment experiment, Coimbra Portugal. J Soils Sediments 16:2622–2639
Fuge R (2012) Anthropogenic sources. Essentials of medical geology, revised. Springer, pp 59–74
Ghani J, Nawab J, Faiq ME, Ullah S, Alam A, Ahmad I, Ali SW, Khan S, Ahmad I, Muhammad A, Ur Rahman SA, Abbas M, Rashid A, Hasan SZ, Hamza A (2022) Multi-geostatistical analyses of the spatial distribution and source apportionment of potentially toxic elements in urban children’s park soils in Pakistan: a risk assessment study. Environ Pollut 311:119961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2022.119961
Ghani J, Nawab J, Ullah Z, Rafiq N, Hasan SZ, Khan S, Shah M, Almutairi MH (2023) Multivariate statistical methods and GIS-based evaluation of potable water in urban children’s parks due to potentially toxic elements contamination: a children’s health risk assessment study in a developing country. Sustainability 15(17):13177
Gilani SR, Batool M, Ali Zaidi SR, Mahmood Z, Bhatti AA, Durrani AI (2015) Central nervous system (CNS) toxicity caused by metal poisoning: Brain as a target organ. Pak J Pharm Sci 28(4):1417–1423
Harper C (2005) Toxicological profile for tin and tin compounds. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry
Hassaan MA, El Nemr A, Madkour FF (2016) Environmental assessment of heavy metal pollution and human health risk. Am J Water Sci Eng 2(3):14–19
Hendry JH, Simon SL, Wojcik A, Sohrabi M, Burkart W, Cardis E, Laurier D, Tirmarche M, Hayata I (2009) Human exposure to high natural background radiation: what can it teach us about radiation risks? J Radiol Prot 29(2A):A29
Hussain R, Khattak SA, Shah MT, Ali L (2015) Multistatistical approaches for environmental geochemical assessment of pollutants in soils of Gadoon Amazai Industrial Estate, Pakistan. J Soils Sediments 15:1119–1129
Irshad S, Liu G, Yousaf B, Ullah H, Ali MU, Rinklebe J (2019) Estimating the pollution characteristics and health risks of potentially toxic metal(loid)s in urban-industrial soils in the Indus basin Pakistan. Environ Monit Assess 191(12):748. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7909-y
Iyer M, Anand U, Thiruvenkataswamy S, Babu HWS, Narayanasamy A, Prajapati VK, Tiwari CK, Gopalakrishnan AV, Bontempi E, Sonne C, Barceló D, Vellingiri B (2023) A review of chromium (Cr) epigenetic toxicity and health hazards. Sci Total Environ 882:163483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163483
Jain TB, Graham RT, Adams DL (1997a) Carbon to organic matter ratios for soils in Rocky Mountain coniferous forests. Soil Sci Soc Am J 61(4):1190–1195
Jain TB, Graham RT, Adams DL (1997b) Carbon to organic matter ratios for soils in Rocky Mountain coniferous forests. Soil Sci Soc Am J 61(4):4
James AC, Stahlhofen W, Rudolf G, Egan MJ, Nixon W, Gehr P, Briant JK (1991) The respiratory tract deposition model proposed by the ICRP task group. Radiat Prot Dosim 38(1–3):159–165
Kamani H, Mahvi AH, Seyedsalehi M, Jaafari J, Hoseini M, Safari GH, Dalvand A, Aslani H, Mirzaei N, Ashrafi SD (2017) Contamination and ecological risk assessment of heavy metals in street dust of Tehran Iran. Int J Environ Sci Technol 14:2675–2682
Klement AW (2019) Natural sources of environmental radiation. Handbook of environmental radiation. CRC Press, pp 5–21
Koller M, Saleh HM (2018) Introductory chapter: Introducing heavy metals. Heavy Metals 1:3–11
Kuo C-Y, Wong R-H, Lin J-Y, Lai J-C, Lee H (2006) Accumulation of chromium and nickel metals in lung tumors from lung cancer patients in Taiwan. J Toxicol Environ Health A 69(14):1337–1344
Li W, Ni P, Yi Y (2019) Comparison of reactive magnesia, quick lime, and ordinary Portland cement for stabilization/solidification of heavy metal-contaminated soils. Sci Total Environ 671:741–753
Lichte FE, Golightly DW, Lamothe PJ (1987) Inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry. Methods for geochemical analysis, vol 1770. USDI US Geological Survey, Washington, pp B1–B10
Mahurpawar M (2015) Effects of heavy metals on human health. Int J Res Granthaalayah 530(516):1–7
Malik RN, Jadoon WA, Husain SZ (2010) Metal contamination of surface soils of industrial city Sialkot, Pakistan: a multivariate and GIS approach. Environ Geochem Health 32:179–191
Mondal NK (2020) Prevalence of Arsenic in chicken feed and its contamination pattern in different parts of chicken flesh: a market basket study. Environ Monit Assess 192(9):590
Muhammad S (2023) Evaluation of heavy metals in water and sediments, pollution, and risk indices of Naltar Lakes Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(10):28217–28226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24160-9
Mwai L, Onyatta J, Were FH (2022) Lead in automotive paints: a potential source of exposure and environmental contamination. Available at SSRN 4051266
Nusrat M, Siddique N, Wazir Z, Hussain SZ, Kakar A (2021) Neutron activation analysis and gamma spectrometry of Shawa oil well of Kohat basin. Pakistan. Environ Earth Sci 81(1):11
Oves M, Khan MS, Zaidi A, Ahmad E (2012) Soil contamination, nutritive value, and human health risk assessment of heavy metals: an overview. Springer
Ozaki H, Watanabe I, Kuno K (2004) Investigation of the heavy metal sources in relation to automobiles. Water Air Soil Pollut 157:209–223
Prakash S, Verma AK (2022) Anthropogenic activities and Biodiversity threats. Int J Biol Innov IJBI 4(1):94–103
Radiation UNSC on the E of A (2000) Sources and effects of ionizing radiation, United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR) 2000 Report, volume I: Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes-Sources. United Nations
Salbu B (2006) Speciation of radionuclides in the environment. In: Encyclopedia of analytical chemistry: applications, theory and instrumentation
Salim Z, Khan MU, Malik RN (2020) Concentration, distribution and association of heavy metals in Multi-matrix samples of Himalayan foothill along elevation gradients. Environ Earth Sci 79:1–15
Sarkar B (2002) Heavy metals in the environment. CRC Press
Satti KH, Jabbar T, Dilband M, Chaudhry MM, Jabbar A, Arshad W (2016) Spatial distribution of radionuclides and major elements in soil of Murree and Kotli Sattian Punjab, Pakistan
Shah ZH, Siddique N, Wazir Z, Batool N, Nusrat M (2022a) Radiological and elemental analysis of well cuttings from Rajian oil field, Potohar Basin, Pakistan. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 331(6):2479–2494
Shah ZH, Siddique N, Wazir Z, Batool N, Nusrat M, Somaily HH (2022b) Gamma spectrometry and neutron activation analysis of toot oilfield wells of Datta Formation, Upper Indus Basin, District Attock, Punjab Pakistan. Radiat Protect Dosim 198(1–2):86–99
Siddique N, Rahman A, Waheed S, Wasim M, Daud M, Ahmad S (2006) Measurement of radionuclides in contaminated environmental matrices: Participation in quality assessment programme of US Department of energy’s environmental monitoring laboratory
Substances A for T & Registry D (1999) Toxicological profile for uranium (update). Public Health Service, US Department of Health and Human Services Atlanta
Taylor SR (1964) Abundance of chemical elements in the continental crust: a new table. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 28(8):1273–1285
Tong S, Li H, Wang L, Tudi M, Yang L (2020) Concentration, spatial distribution, contamination degree and human health risk assessment of heavy metals in urban soils across China between 2003 and 2019—a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17(9):3099
Tyler G (1981) Heavy metals in soil biology and biochemistry. Soil Biochem 5:371–414
Vareda JP, Valente AJ, Durães L (2019) Assessment of heavy metal pollution from anthropogenic activities and remediation strategies: a review. J Environ Manag 246:101–118
Vellingiri B, Suriyanarayanan A, Abraham KS, Venkatesan D, Iyer M, Raj N, Gopalakrishnan AV (2022) Influence of heavy metals in Parkinson’s disease: an overview. J Neurol 269(11):5798–5811
Vouk VB, Piver WT (1983) Metallic elements in fossil fuel combustion products: amounts and form of emissions and evaluation of carcinogenicity and mutagenicity. Environ Health Perspect 47:201–225
Wallinga D (2006) Frequently asked questions on playing chicken: Avoiding arsenic in your meat. Institute for Agriculture and Trade. Policy, 4
Wasim M, Iqbal S, Ali M (2016) Radiological and elemental analysis of soils from Hunza in Central Karakoram using gamma-ray spectrometry and k 0-instrumental neutron activation analysis. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 307:891–898
Wedepohl KH (1995) The composition of the continental crust. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 59(7):1217–1232
Yao J, Xu P, Huang Z (2021) Impact of urbanization on ecological efficiency in China: an empirical analysis based on provincial panel data. Ecol Ind 129:107827
Younis H, Ahmad F, Shehzadi R, Asghar I, Ahmad T, Ajaz M, Waqas M, Mehboob K, Qureshi AA, Haj Ismail AAK (2021) Study of radioactivity in Bajaur Norite exposed in the Himalayan tectonic zone of Northern Pakistan. Atmosphere 12(11):1385
Yuan X, Xue N, Han Z (2021) A meta-analysis of heavy metals pollution in farmland and urban soils in China over the past 20 years. J Environ Sci 101:217–226
Zárate-Quiñones RH, Custodio M, Orellana-Mendoza E, Cuadrado-Campó WJ, Grijalva-Aroni PL, Peñaloza R (2021) Determination of toxic metals in commonly consumed medicinal plants largely used in Peru by ICP-MS and their impact on human health. Chem Data Collect 33:100711
Zaynab M, Al-Yahyai R, Ameen A, Sharif Y, Ali L, Fatima M, Khan KA, Li S (2022) Health and environmental effects of heavy metals. J King Saud Univ Sci 34(1):101653
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank Mr. Muhammad bin Anjum, Sanaullah Tariq and Usama Zahid for their assistance in gathering the samples. The author would like to thank Head CAFD PINSTECH, the staff of Radiation Physics Lab (COMSATS Islamabad), MNSR Lab, and Plasma Spectroscopy Lab (PINSTECH Islamabad) for their cooperation.
Funding
This work was carried out under the IAEA RCA Research Contract No. RCARP02/RC07 for Project “Distribution and Source Apportionment of Industrial Pollution & its Health Impact Using NATs”, under Research Contract “Air Quality and Environmental Impact Assessment of Industrial Activities in Asian Region” (2021–2023).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Author Contribution Statement Mavia.A, conceptualization; sample collection and preparation; Data curation; Investigation; Methodology; Data analysis; Software; Visualization; original draft; N.S, Supervision; Validation; Resources; Project administration; review & editing H.Y, Supervision; Validation; review & editing. Y.F, Resources; review & editing. M.A.S, Formal analysis; Resources. Mahnoor, Sample collection and preparation, Data analysis R.F, Data analysis N.H.A, Data Analysis
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have not disclosed any competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Anjum, M., Siddique, N., Younis, H. et al. Evaluating heavy metal contamination and radiological effects in soil samples from Murree, Pakistan. Environ Earth Sci 83, 361 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-024-11673-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-024-11673-4