Abstract
In this paper, we obtain the exact solutions of the (1+1) dimensional complex cubic Ginzburg–Landau equation (CCGLE) by using the Hirota bilinear method, this equation is a universal model for the evolution of the envelope of slowly varying waves packets in nonlinear dissipative media. Different types of solutions including solitons, lump and rogue wave solutions are gotten by taking different transformations. Besides, the physical significance of these solutions of CCGLE can be understood better through drawing \(\text{3D, } \text{2D }\) and contour plots.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
In many nonlinear physical systems, the diffusion of local pulses or solitons are controlled by different types of complex Ginzburg–Landau equations (CGLEs) including the dispersion and nonlinear effects of the conservative and dissipative forms[1, 2]. As universal models of mode formation in nonlinear dissipative media [3], complex Ginzburg–Landau equations (CGLEs) describe a variety of phenomena at the qualitative and even quantitative levels, from nonlinear wave to second–order transitions, from superconducting supercurrent, Bose-Einstein condensates (BEC) to strings and plasmas in liquid crystal field theory [4,5,6,7,8]. Therefore, it is very important to solve the exact solutions of partial differential equations, especially CGLEs [9,10,11]. So far, different types of solutions to one–dimensional complex Ginzburg–Landau equations have been analyzed such as impulse, quasi–impact, source, sink, periodic and quasi–periodic solutions [1].
As a kind of general amplitude equations in physics [12], complex cubic Ginzburg–Landau equations (CCGLEs) are also used to research many practical problems. For example, chemical turbulence, Rayleigh–Beynard convection [13], Taylor–Coutte flow, Poiseuille flow, reaction–diffusion systems, nonlinear optical and hydromechanical stability problems [14]. Specially, Its dark solitary waves were also discovered by Nazaki and Bekki, although they are unstable [16].
In this paper, we investigate the (1+1) dimensional complex cubic Ginzburg–Landau equation (CCGLE) which is used to describe dissipative systems above the bifurcation point [17], examples of applications include pulse generation by passive mode–locked soliton lasers [18], signal transmission in optical communications lines, traveling waves in binary fluid mixtures [19] and pattern formation [20] in many other physical systems [12]. The (1+1) dimensional complex cubic Ginzburg–Landau equation has the following form [14, 21]
where \(\chi (x,t)\) is a complex function from \(\mathrm {R^{2}}\) to \(\textrm{C}\) representing the modulation of the oscillating field, b and r are two real control parameters [14]. \(r \chi \) and \((1+i b) |\chi |^{2} \chi \) describe the local dynamics of the oscillators, \(r \chi \) leads to the linear instability mechanism of the oscillation and \((1+i b) |\chi |^{2} \chi \) produces nonlinear amplitude saturation and frequency renormalization. \((1+i a) \chi _{xx}\) is the spatial coupling which explains diffusion and dispersion of oscillating motion [21].
As far as we know, many different types of solutions of the (1+1) dimensional CCGLE have been given. Such as, the traveling wave solutions were obtained by the first integral and the \(\mathrm {(G'/G)}\)–expansion methods [12], the implicit and explicit solutions were obtained by using the methods of variable separation and plane wave solutions [14], the singular bright solitons, the hybrid periodic solitons, the dark solitons and the periodic M-shaped solitons solutions were acquired via the Sardar sub-equation method [15], the periodic solitons solutions were also gotten through the energy balance method [15], the existence of time quasi–periodic solutions under periodic boundary conditions has been discussed [22]. In addition, by constructing the KAM theorem for dissipative systems with unbounded pertubations and multi–normal frequencies, a Contorian branches of the two dimensional invariant torus for CCGLE also have been obtained [22]. Finally, the kink solitons and periodic solitons solutions were attained based on the foundation of the notions of the planar dynamical theory for CCGLE [23].
However, there are still some solutions that are not used by the (1+1) dimensional CCGLE, such as the Hirota bilinear method has remarkable characteristics, which make it suitable for determining different kinds of solutions [24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. In this paper, we will attain the multiple solitons, lump and rogue wave solutions of Eq. (1) by using the Hirota bilinear method and setting different forms of auxiliary equations.
In order to gain the exact solutions of Eq. (1), we choose following equations to convert it
where u, v are undetermined functions of independent variables x and t.
Inserting Eq. (2) into Eq. (1) and seperating its real and imaginary parts, we can gain
The structure of this article is shown below. In Sect. 2, we can obtain the multiple solitons solutions of the (1+1) dimensional CCGLE through the Hirota bilinear method. The lump solutions can be given in Sect. 3 and the lump–one stripe soliton interaction solutions also can be obtained in Sect. 4. In Sect. 5, the rogue wave solutions can be acquired. In Sect. 6, we discuss the physical meanings of images that we have obtained. Finally, the conclusion is stated in Sect. 7.
2 Multiple solitons solutions
In this section, we will apply the Hirota bilinear method to attain the multiple solitons solutions of the (1+1) dimensional CCGLE.
Firstly, substituting
where \(k_i, m_i\) and \(c_i\) are undetermined constants, into the linear terms of Eq. (3) and Eq. (4) and solving the corresponding equations, we can gain the dispersion relations as follows
where \(k_i\) and \(c_i\) are undetermined constants.
From Eq. (6), we can notice that the dispersion relations \(m_i\) only depend on the coefficients \(k_i\) of x.
In order to get the multiple solitons solutions of the (1+1) dimensional CCGLE, we substitute
where \(R_1\) and \(R_2\) are undetermined constants. f as the auxiliary functions will be determined later.
2.1 Single soliton solutions
To gain the single soliton solutions of the (1+1) dimensional CCGLE, we take account the form of f like following
where \(\theta _1= k_1 x+ (k_1^{2}+ r) t+ c_1\) and \(k_1, c_1\) are undetermined constants.
Inserting Eq. (8) with Eq. (7) into Eq. (3) and Eq. (4), collecting all power coefficients of \(e^{\theta _1}\) and making their results to zero, we can get
Substituting Eq. (9) with Eq. (8) into Eq. (7), we know
where \(c_1, r\) and \(R_2\) are arbitrary constants.
2.2 Double solitons solutions
The auxiliary function f for the double solitons solutions is given by
where \(\theta _1= k_1 x+ (k_1^{2}+ r) t+ c_1, \theta _2= k_2 x+ (k_2^{2}+ r) t+ c_2\) and \(k_1, k_2, c_1, c_2\) are undetermined constants.
Interposing Eq. (11) with Eq. (7) into Eq. (3) and Eq. (4), collecting all coefficients of the same power and making them to zero, we can gain
-
Set-1:
$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned}&~~a= 0,~~~ b= 0,~~ k_1= -\sqrt{\frac{r}{2}},~~k_2=\sqrt{\frac{r}{2}},\\&R_1= \sqrt{2-R_2^{2}},~~ a_{12}=0,~~ r= r,~~ R_2= R_2. \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$(12)
-
Set-2:
$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned}&~~a= 0,~~~ b= 0,~~ k_1= \sqrt{\frac{r}{2}},~~k_2= -\sqrt{\frac{r}{2}},\\&R_1= \sqrt{\frac{1- 2 R_2^{2}}{2}},~~ a_{12}=1,~~ r= r,~~ R_2= R_2. \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$(13)
Plugging above equations with Eq. (11) into Eq. (7), different double solitons solutions can be given.
-
Case 1: \(a_{12}= 0\).
$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned} ~f&= 1+ e^{- \sqrt{\frac{r}{2}} x+\frac{3}{2} r t+ c_1}+ e^{\sqrt{\frac{r}{2}} x+ \frac{3}{2} r t+ c_2},\\ v&=\frac{R_2 \sqrt{\frac{r}{2}} (e^{\sqrt{\frac{r}{2}} x+ \frac{3}{2} r t+ c_2}- e^{-\sqrt{\frac{r}{2}} x+ \frac{3}{2} r t+ c_1})}{1+ e^{- \sqrt{\frac{r}{2}} x+\frac{3}{2} r t+ c_1}+ e^{\sqrt{\frac{r}{2}} x+ \frac{3}{2} r t+ c_2}},\\&u=\frac{\sqrt{\frac{r (2- R_2^{2})}{2}} (e^{\sqrt{\frac{r}{2}} x+ \frac{3}{2} r t+ c_2}- e^{-\sqrt{\frac{r}{2}} x+ \frac{3}{2} r t+ c_1})}{1+ e^{- \sqrt{\frac{r}{2}} x+\frac{3}{2} r t+ c_1}+ e^{\sqrt{\frac{r}{2}} x+ \frac{3}{2} r t+ c_2}},\\ \chi&= \frac{(\sqrt{2- R_2^{2}} +R_2 i) \sqrt{\frac{r}{2}} (e^{\sqrt{\frac{r}{2}} x+ \frac{3}{2} r t+ c_2}- e^{-\sqrt{\frac{r}{2}} x+ \frac{3}{2} r t+ c_1})}{1+ e^{- \sqrt{\frac{r}{2}} x+\frac{3}{2} r t+ c_1}+ e^{\sqrt{\frac{r}{2}} x+ \frac{3}{2} r t+ c_2}}, \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$(14)where \(R_2, r, c_1\) and \(c_2\) are arbitrary constants.
-
Case 2: \(a_{12} \ne 0\).
$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned} f&= 1+ e^{\sqrt{\frac{r}{2}} x+ \frac{3}{2} r t+ c_1}+ e^{-\sqrt{\frac{r}{2}} x+ \frac{3}{2} r t+ c_2}+ e^{3 r t+ c_1+ c_2},\\&v=\frac{R_2 \sqrt{\frac{r}{2}} (e^{\sqrt{\frac{r}{2}} x+ \frac{3}{2} r t+ c_1}- e^{-\sqrt{\frac{r}{2}} x+ \frac{3}{2} r t+ c_2})}{1+ e^{\sqrt{\frac{r}{2}} x+ \frac{3}{2} r t+ c_1}+ e^{-\sqrt{\frac{r}{2}} x+ \frac{3}{2} r t+ c_2}+ e^{3 r t+ c_1+ c_2}},\\ u&=\frac{\frac{\sqrt{r (1- 2 R_2^{2})}}{2} (e^{\sqrt{\frac{r}{2}} x+ \frac{3}{2} r t+ c_1}- e^{-\sqrt{\frac{r}{2}} x+ \frac{3}{2} r t+ c_2})}{1+ e^{\sqrt{\frac{r}{2}} x+ \frac{3}{2} r t+ c_1}+ e^{-\sqrt{\frac{r}{2}} x+ \frac{3}{2} r t+ c_2}+ e^{3 r t+ c_1+ c_2}},\\ \chi&= \frac{(\sqrt{\frac{1- 2 R_2^{2}}{2}}+ R_2 i) \sqrt{\frac{r}{2}} (e^{\sqrt{\frac{r}{2}} x+ \frac{3}{2} r t+ c_1}- e^{-\sqrt{\frac{r}{2}} x+ \frac{3}{2} r t+ c_2})}{1+ e^{\sqrt{\frac{r}{2}} x+ \frac{3}{2} r t+ c_1}+ e^{-\sqrt{\frac{r}{2}} x+ \frac{3}{2} r t+ c_2}+ e^{3 r t+ c_1+ c_2}}. \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$(15)where \(R_2, r, c_1\) and \(c_2\) are arbitrary constants.
2.3 Three solitons solutions
The auxiliary function f for the three solitons solutions is given in the following form
where \(\theta _1= k_1 x+ (k_1^{2}+ r) t+ c_1, \theta _2= k_2 x+ (k_2^{2}+ r) t+ c_2, \theta _3= k_3 x+ (k_3^{2}+ r) t+ c_3\) and \(k_1, k_2, k_3, c_1, c_2, c_3\) are undetermined constants.
Inserting Eq. (16) with Eq. (7) into Eq. (3) and Eq. (4), combining similar terms and making their coefficients to zero, we can know
Substituting Eq. (17) with Eq. (16) into Eq. (7), three solitons solutions can be obtained as follows
where \(W_1= e^{c_2}+ e^{c_3}, W_2= e^{A_{12}}+ e^{A_{13}}, A_{12}= c_1+c_2, A_{13}= c_1+ c_3, A_{23}= c_2+ c_3, B_{123}= c_1+ c_2+ c_3\) and \( R_2, r, c_1, c_2, c_3\) are arbitrary constants.
3 Lump solutions
To gain the lump solutions of the (1+1) dimensional CCGLE, we use the following transformations
where f, g as the auxiliary functions will be decided later.
Equation(19) transforms Eq. (3) and Eq. (4) into the following bilinear forms
For lump solutions, we assume f and g have the following bilinear forms
where \(\xi = p_1 x+ l_1 t, \xi _2= p_2 x+ l_2 t\) and \(p_1, p_2, l_1, l_2, \alpha , \beta \) are undecided constants.
Inserting Eq. (22) into Eq. (20) and Eq. (21) and solving corresponding equations, we can attain
Interposing Eq. (23) into Eq. (22) and Eq. (19), the form of lump solution can be given
where \(p_1, l_1, \alpha , \beta \) are arbitrary constants.
4 Lump-one stripe soliton interaction solutions
The auxiliary functions f and g for the lump-one stripe soliton interaction solutions can be given as
where \(\xi _3= p_3 x+ l_3 t, \xi _4= p_4 x+ l_4 t, \xi _5= p_5 x+ l_5 t\) and \(p_3, p_4, p_5, l_3, l_4, l_5, \delta , \epsilon \) are undecided constants.
Plugging Eq. (25) into Eq. (20) and Eq. (21), the values of undetermined constants can be gotten.
-
Set-1:
$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned} a&= 1, b= \frac{1}{2}, l_3=i, l_4= 1, r=r,\\&\delta = 0, \epsilon = 0, p_3= p_3, p_5= \sqrt{r}, l_5= r,p_4= p_3 i. \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$(26)
-
Set-2:
$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned} ~a&= 1, b= 1, r=0, p_5= 0,\delta = 0, \epsilon = 0,\\&l_3= l_3, p_3= p_3,p_4= p_3 i,l_4=- l_3 i,l_5= l_5. \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$(27)
Inserting these results into Eq. (25) and Eq. (19), we can get following different lump-one stripe soliton interaction solutions of the (1+1) dimensional CCGLE.
-
Case 1: \(r \ne 0, p_5 \ne 0.\)
$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned} f&= 4 p_3 i x t+ e^{\sqrt{r} x+ r t},g= 4 p_3 i x t+ e^{\sqrt{r} x+ r t},\\ u&= \frac{4 p_3 i t+ \sqrt{r} e^{\sqrt{r} x+r t}}{4 p_3 i x t+ e^{\sqrt{r} x+ r t}},v= \frac{4 p_3 i t+ \sqrt{r} e^{\sqrt{r} x+r t}}{4 p_3 i x t+ e^{\sqrt{r} x+ r t}},\\ \chi&= \frac{(1+ i) (4 p_3 i t+ \sqrt{r} e^{\sqrt{r} x+r t})}{4 p_3 i x t+ e^{\sqrt{r} x+ r t}}, \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$(28)where \(p_3, r\) are arbitrary constants.
-
Case 2: \(r= 0, p_5= 0.\)
$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned} f&= 4 p_3 l_3 x t+ e^{l_5 t},g= 4 p_3 l_3 x t+ e^{l_5 t},\\ u&= \frac{4 p_3 l_3 t}{4 p_3 l_3 x t+ e^{l_5 t}},v= \frac{4 p_3 l_3 t}{4 p_3 l_3 x t+ e^{l_5 t}},\\ \chi{} & {} = \frac{(1+ i) 4 p_3 l_3 t}{4 p_3 l_3 x t+ e^{l_5 t}}, \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$(29)where \(p_3, l_3, l_5\) are arbitrary constants.
5 Rogue wave solutions
To gain rogue wave solutions, the bilinear forms of auxiliary functions f and g can be assumed as follows
where \(\xi _6= p_6 x+ l_6 t, \xi _7= p_7 x+ l_7 t, \xi _8= p_8 x+ l_8 t\) and \(p_6, p_7, p_8, l_6, l_7, l_8, \sigma , \zeta \) are undecided constants.
Inserting Eq. (30) into Eq. (20) and Eq. (21), we can understand
-
Set-1:
$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned} b&= a,p_7= p_6 i, l_7= -l_6 i, p_6= p_6, l_6= l_6,\\&\sigma = 0,~~\zeta = 0, r=r,l_8= 0, p_8= \frac{\sqrt{r}}{\sqrt{2 (1-a)}}. \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$(31)
-
Set-2:
$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned} b&= 0,a= 0,l_8= 0, p_8= \sqrt{\frac{r}{2}}, r=r,\\&\sigma = 0,\zeta = 0,~~p_7= p_6 i, l_7= l_6 i, p_6= p_6,l_6= l_6, \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$(32)
where \(p_6, l_6, r\) are arbitrary constants.
Plugging above results into Eq. (30) and Eq. (19), we can acquire different forms of rogue wave solutions of the (1+1) dimensional CCGLE.
-
Case 1: \(a \ne 0\).
$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned} f&= 4 p_6 l_6 x t+ \text{ cosh } (\sqrt{\frac{r}{2 (1-a)} \textit{x})},~ g\\&\quad = 4 p_6 l_6 x t+ \text{ cosh }(\sqrt{\frac{r}{2 (1-a)} \textit{x})},\\ u&= \frac{4 p_6 l_6 t+ \sqrt{\frac{r}{2 (1-a)}} \text{ cosh } (\sqrt{\frac{r}{2 (1-a)}} \textit{x})}{4 p_6 l_6 x t+ \text{ cosh } (\sqrt{\frac{r}{2 (1-a)}} \textit{x})},~ v\\&\quad = \frac{4 p_6 l_6 t+ \sqrt{\frac{r}{2 (1-a)}} \text{ cosh } (\sqrt{\frac{r}{2 (1-a)}} \textit{x})}{4 p_6 l_6 x t+ \text{ cosh } (\sqrt{\frac{r}{2 (1-a)} \textit{x})}},\\ \chi&=\frac{(1+ i) (4 p_6 l_6 t+ \sqrt{\frac{r}{2 (1-a)}} \text{ cosh } (\sqrt{\frac{r}{2 (1-a)}} \textit{x}))}{4 p_6 l_6 x t+ \text{ cosh }(\sqrt{\frac{r}{2 (1-a)} \textit{x})}}, \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$(33)where \(r, p_6, l_6\) are arbitrary constants.
-
Case 2: \(a= 0\).
$$\begin{aligned} \begin{aligned} f&= 4 p_6 l_6 x t+ \text{ cosh }(\sqrt{\frac{r}{2}} \textit{x}), g= 4 p_6 l_6 x t+ \text{ cosh }(\sqrt{\frac{r}{2}} \textit{x}),\\ u&= \frac{4 p_6 l_6 t+ \sqrt{\frac{r}{2)}} \text{ cosh }(\sqrt{\frac{r}{2}} \textit{x})}{4 p_6 l_6 x t+ \text{ cosh }(\sqrt{\frac{r}{2}} \textit{x})},~ v= \frac{4 p_6 l_6 t+ \sqrt{\frac{r}{2}} \text{ cosh }(\sqrt{\frac{r}{2}} \textit{x})}{4 p_6 l_6 x t+ \text{ cosh }(\sqrt{\frac{r}{2}} \textit{x})},\\ \chi&=\frac{(1+ i) (4 p_6 l_6 t+ \sqrt{\frac{r}{2}} \text{ cosh }(\sqrt{\frac{r}{2}} \textit{x}))}{4 p_6 l_6 x t+ \text{ cosh }(\sqrt{\frac{r}{2}} \textit{x})}, \end{aligned} \end{aligned}$$(34)where \(r, p_6, l_6\) are arbitrary constants.
6 Images analyses
By taking special values to r, \(R_2\) and \(c_1\), we can gain the single soliton of Eq. (1) as shown in Fig. 1. We can know that a list of single solitons that are symmetric about the plane \(x=0\) appear in the \(x-t\) plane and the solitons only have one peak, which can be seen in Fig. 1b. When the values of t are fixed, it is clear that the solitons with the same shapes and amplitudes appear periodically and the same situation doesn’t occur when the values of x are fixed, which indicates that the single solitons propagate along the x-axis. Besides, we can see that the single solitons here are optical solitons from the density plot.
Similarly, as Figs. 2 and 3 showing, the double and three solitons of Eq. (1) can be given by assigning special values to r, \(R_2\) and \(c_j\). We can observe that the double and three solitons also propagate periodically along the x-axis and the shapes and amplitudes keep unchange when the values of t are fixed. However, unlike the single solitons, the double solitons have two peaks and the three solitons have three peaks in the propagation process, which can be seen in Figs. 2a and 3a. In general, each line in Fig. 2b should contain two peaks and in Fig. 3b should contain three peaks. However, we can see that the lines only have two peaks in Fig. 3b and this is due to the arrangement of the three solitons in Fig. 3a. To prove this point, we find that each line in Fig. 3c also contains two peaks.
We can acquire the image of the lump solution as shown in Fig. 4 by giving \(\alpha \), \(\beta \), \(l_1\) and \(p_1\) special values. It seems that the image of the lump solution is simliar to the single soliton solution from Fig. 4b, but we also can notice that the image appears in chunk at the base of the soliton. When the values of x are fixed, it is obvious that the two lump solitons appear symmetrically on either side of the line \(t=0\) and the function values gradually approache 0 as t approache 0. Finally, we can know that there exists a lump region between the two lump solitons.
The image of the lump-one stripe soliton interaction solution can be given as shown in Fig. 5 by taking special values to \(p_3\) and r. As t gradually approache \(t=0\) from the negative half-axis of t, solitons that propagate periodically along the x-axis appear. While \(x=0\), soliton is periodic along the t-axis only if \(t>0\). This result also can be drawn from the density plot.
As Fig. 6 showing, the diagram of the rogue wave solution can be obtained by giving a, \(l_6\), \(p_6\) and r. It is obvious that there is a list of waves with the same amplitudes in the middle of the plane and the amplitudes of the waves increase for a short period of time, which is exactly the characteristic of the rogue wave. In addition, we also can find that at the amplitudes of the waves \(t=-0.2\) and 0.2 are significantly lower than those at \(t=-10\) and 10 from Fig. 6b, which also show that the amplitudes of the waves increase sharply as they approache the line \(t=0\).
7 Conclusion
In this article, we gain solitons solutions of the (1+1) dimensional CCGLE via the transformations of \(u=(\text{ In }f)_x\) and \(v=(\text{ In }f)_x\). On this basis, by taking different forms of f, the single, double and three solitons solutions can be obtained. Besides, we also attain the lump and rogue wave solutions of the (1+1) dimensional CCGLE by applying the transformations \(u=(\text{ In }f)_x\) and \(v=(\text{ In }g)_x\) and taking different functions forms of f and g. Finally, through \(\text{3D }\), 2D, density images and proper interpretation, we can know the features and the contours differences of different solutions. This article is different from previous literatures that need to transform partial differential equations into ordinary differential equations. At the same time, this article also provides ideas and ways for those equations that can’t be completely reduced to bilinear forms but whose solitons solutions are desired.
Data availability
The datasets generated during the current study are not publicly available due to individual privacy but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
L C Crasovan and B A Malomed Physics Review E 62 1322 (2000)
G A Zakeri and E Yomba Physics Review E 91 062904 (2015)
B A Malomed Chaos 17 037117 (2007)
G A Zakeri and E Yomba Physics Review A 377 148 (2013)
I S Aranson and L Kramer Reviews of Modern Physics 4 99 (2002)
A Sigler and B A Malomed Physica D-Nonlinear Phenonmena 212 305 (2005)
H Rezazadeh Optik 167 218 (2018)
G Akram and N Maha Optik 164 210 (2018)
N Guzel and M Bayram Applied Mathematics and Computation 174 1279 (2006)
M S Hashemi, M Inc and M Bayram Revista Mexicana de Física 65 529–535 (2019)
Z Korpinar, M Inc, D Baleanu and M Bayram Journal of Taibah University for Science 13 813–819 (2019)
F Batool and G Akram Optical and Quantum Electronics 49 129 (2017)
D J B Lloyd, A R Champneys and R E Wilson Physica D-Nonlinear Phenonmena 204 240 (2005)
A M Wazwaz Applied Mathematics Letters 19 1007 (2006)
S Ahmad, E E Mahmoud, S Saifullah, A Ullah, S Ahmad, A Akgül and S M El Din Results in Physics 51 106736 (2023)
N Efremidis, K Hizanidis, H E Nistazakis, D J Frantzeskakis and B A Malomed Physics Review E 62 7410 (2000)
W P Hong Zeitschrift Fur Naturforschung Section A-A Journal of Physical Sciences 12 757 (2008)
E P Ippen Applied Physics B 58 159 (1994)
P Kolodner Physical Review Letters 66 1165 (1991)
M C Cross and P C Hohenberg Reviews of Modern Physics 65 851 (1993)
M E Victor, H G Emilio and P Oreste Chaotic Dynamics 9 2209 (2019)
H Z Cong and M N Gao Journal of Dynamics and Differential Equations 23 1053 (2011)
S Ahmad, J Lou, M A Khan and M U Rahman Physica Scripta 99 015249 (2024)
P Cui Results in Physics 22 103919 (2021)
Y F Hua, B L Guo, W X Mac and X Lü Applied Mathematical Modelling 74 184 (2019)
L Na Nonlinear Dynamics 82 311 (2015)
A M Wazwaz Mathmatical Methods in the Applied Sciences 82 1580 (2011)
S T R Rizvi, A R Seadawy, K Ali, M Younis and M A Ashra Optical and Quantum Electronics 54 212 (2022)
S Ahmad, S Saifullah, A Khan and A M Wazwaz Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation 119 107117 (2023)
M U Rahman, M Alqudah, M A Khan, B E H Ali, S Ahmad, E E Mahmoud and M Sun Results in Physics 56 107269 (2024)
A Khan, S Saifullah, S Ahmad, J Khan and D Baleanu Nonlinear Dynamics 111 5743 (2023)
A Yusuf, T A Sulaiman, E M Khalil, M Bayram and H Ahmad Results in Physics 21 103775 (2021)
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi (No. 202103021224068).
Funding
Funding was provided by Natural Science Foundation of Shanxi (Grant number: 202103021224068).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no Conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, L., Gao, B. Multiple solitons solutions, lump solutions and rogue wave solutions of the complex cubic Ginzburg–Landau equation with the Hirota bilinear method. Indian J Phys (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-024-03242-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-024-03242-z