Abstract
This study presents an advanced computational Levenberg–Marquardt backpropagation (LMB) neural network for the novel third order (NTO) pantograph Emden–Fowler system (PEFS), i.e., (NTO-PEFS) together with its two forms. The designed novel NTO-PEFS is achieved using the pantograph system and standard form of the Emden–Fowler system. The detail of each form of the NTO-PEFS based on the singular points, pantographs and shape factors is also provided. The numerical performance using the LMB neural network is tested for three different variants of the model and obtained results will be compared through the designed dataset based exact solutions. To assess the approximate solutions of the NTO-PEFS for both forms of each example, the process of testing, authentication and training are implemented to reduce the mean square error (MSE) based on the LMB. One can find the values based absolute error are close to 10–04 to 10–08 for each problem to solve the NTO-PEFS using the stochastic computing paradigms. The relative studies and performance investigations for the error histograms, regression, correlation and MSE enhance the effectiveness as well as the exactness of the designed LMB neural network scheme.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
The ordinary form of the differential equations is considered very important for the researcher community due to the assortment of applications in technology, science, and engineering. The recent work is related to the nonlinear Emden–Fowler model (NEFM) known as a singular differential model, which is considered complicated because of its stiffer nature. The researchers applied many analytical and numerical tools in different decades to solve the NEFM. The NEFM has been programmatic in many areas of fluid dynamics, population growth, pattern creation system and chemical reactors. The NEFM is mathematically written as (Sabir 2020a, 2020b; Adel et al. 2020; Sabir et al. 2020a; Li et al. 2017):
where \(\xi\) is the value of the shape factor, for \(h(t) = 1\), the NEFM takes the form of Lane–Emden singular model (LESM), mathematically written as:
The celebrated LESM presented in the above Eq. (2) presented by a famous astrophysicists H. Lane along with R. Emden. This LESM is applied in the modeling of spherical gas cloud, mathematical physics, structure of polytropic star, stellar configuration, self-gravitating gas clouds and in the modeling of cluster galaxies (Ahmad et al. 2017; Singh et al. 2019a; Abbas et al. 2019; Li et al. 2018). The function \(z(v)\) shows several forms of the LESM like as \(z(v) = v^{r}\) is considered a most prominent form. It is perceived that the LESM is identified as a linear equation for the values of r = 0 and 1, else it depicts nonlinear performance. The LESM of second kind presents the isothermal gas sphere for \(z(v) = e^{v}\). Few other forms of \(z(v)\) express the nonlinearity, like \(\sin v/\cos v,\,\sinh v\) and \(\cosh v,\) etc. The LESM becomes white dwarf by taking \(z(v) = \left( {v^{2} - C} \right)^{1.5}\) proposed by Chandrasekhar (Chandrasekhar 1967). The LESM has a variety of applications in dusty fluid models (Flockerzi and Sundmacher 2011), physical sciences (Mandelzweig and Tabakin 2001), gaseous star (Luo et al. 2016), electromagnetic theory (Khan et al. 2015), catalytic reactions (Rach et al. 2014), sublinear neutral factor (Dv{z}urina et al. 2020), isotropic continuous media (Radulescu and Repovs 2012), morphogenesis investigations (Ghergu and Radulescu 2007), quantum/classical mechanics (Ramos 2003) and oscillating magnetic systems (Dehghan and Shakeri 2008).
The singular systems are not easy to solve because of stiff nature and only a few numerical and analytic schemes found in the literature to solve these models. Some testified approaches to handle these models are the Adomian decomposition method proposed by Shawagfeh (Shawagfeh 1993). Sabir et al. (2020) solved a 3rd singular functional system using the differential transformation approach. Romas et al. (Ramos 2008) proposed the series scheme to solve the LESM analytically. Singh et al. (2019b) discussed Haar wavelet based collocation approach to solve the LESM. Saeed et al. (2017) implemented the Haar Adomian approach in order to solve the fractional nonlinear LESM. Dizicheh et al. (2020) suggested the Legendre spectral wavelet approach to solve the nonlinear LESM. Hashemi et al. (Hashemi et al. 2017) proposed the LESM using the group preserving and reproduced kernel approaches. Bender et al. (Bender et al. 1989) derived a perturbative approach to evade the singular point difficulty. Nouh (Nouh 2004) discussed the singular models using the power series as well as Pade approximation schemes and many more (Angelov et al. Oct. 2018; Angelov and Gu 2019; Sabir et al. 2022a, 2022b; Raja et al. 2018; Botmart et al. 2022).
The model based on the pantograph differential (PD) equation is considered significant due to its enormous submissions in the variety of biological and scientific works, like as, dynamical population system, communication system, control problems, light absorption in the stellar matter, engineering, economical models, transport, electronic systems, quantum mechanics, propagation systems and infectious diseases (Li and Liu 2000; Kuang and ed., 1993; Zhao 1995; Li et al. 2014; Niculescu 2001; Vanani et al. 2011). Many numerical and analytical tools have been implemented to solve such models, as the Direchlet series approach has been functional to solve the PD model analytically (Liu and Li 2004), differential transformation one-dimensional approach has been implemented to solve the nonlinear higher order multiple PD system (Koroma et al. 2013), the Taylor approximate polynomial has been used to solve the PD system (Sezer and Şahin 2008) and many other approaches have been introduced to solve PD system, see References (Keskin et al. 2007; Derfel and Iserles 1997; Abazari and Abazari 2009; Saadatmandi and Dehghan 2009; Benhammouda et al. 2014; Widatalla and Koroma 2012; Feng 2013).
The intension of the present research is to design a nonlinear third order (NTO) pantograph Emden–Fowler system (PEFS), i.e., (NTO-PEFS) together with its two forms. The solution of the designed system based equations have been proposed based Levenberg–Marquardt backpropagation (LMB) neural network. The system based on singular models has huge importance in the field of science and engineering, e.g., chemical reactor fields, theory of boundary layer, network flow in biology and optimization control (Shah, et al. 2020; Umar et al. 2020a; Umar et al. 2020b; Jadoon, et al. 2020; Jadoon 2020; Bukhari et al. 2020; Ahmad 2020; Mehmood et al. 2020; Raja et al. 2020).
The highlighted geographies of the current research are presented as:
-
The design of a novel NTO-PEFS is presented with its two forms using the typical form of the NEFM and the PD model together with the details of the singular points, shape factors and pantographs.
-
The solution of both the forms based novel NTO-PEFS have been numerically presented by applying the strength of the LMB neural network approach.
-
A reference-based dataset using the exact solutions with the proposed neural network approach is conventional for each form of the novel NTO-PEFS.
-
The matching/overlapping of the proposed outcomes establishes the worth of the LMB neural network approach to solve the novel NTO-PEFS.
-
The LMB neural network approach performance using the comparative studies based on mean square error (MSE), correlation, error histograms (EHs) and regression metrics is also provided.
The other paper is planned as: The construction of NTO-PEFS together with its both forms is given in Sect. 2. The design of the novel NTO-PEFS based problems are given in Sect. 3. The LMB neural network approach, essential description, and numerical solutions of the novel NTO-PEFS via LMB neural network approach is given in Sect. 4. The final statements are provided in the final Sect.
2 Structure of the novel NTO-PEFS
Two different forms based on the novel NTO-PEFS are provided in this section. The novel NTO-PEFS structure is provided with the shape factors, pantographs and singularity for both of the types. The boundary conditions (BCs) of the novel NTO-PEFS are found using the terminology of the typical NEFM. To derive the novel NTO-PEFS, the mathematical construction is provided as (Guirao et al. 2020; Sabir et al. 2022c, 2020b):
where \(q_{1}\) and \(q_{2}\) are chosen as positive and real, \(h_{1} (t)\) and \(h_{2} (t)\) are the given values of the function, \(l(t)\) and \(m(t)\) are the forcing functions, \(\beta\) shows the pantographs, \(z_{1} (u,v)\) and \(z_{2} (u,v)\) are the functions of u and v. To construct the NTO-PEFS, the values can be selected as:
The following possibilities can be chosen as:
Using the Eqs. (5) and (6), the system (3) is categorized in two forms as:
2.1 1st form of the novel NTO-PEFS
System (3) takes the form by using the Eq. (5) is
The derivative form of the Eq. (7) is given as:
Using the Eq. (8), the simplified form of the Eq. (7) is taken as:
The associated BCs are written as:
The system (9) and (10) shows the first form of the novel NTO-PEFS. For both u(t) and v(t), the parameters of the pantographs are noticed in the 1st, 2nd and 3rd factor and the singular points appeared twice at \(t = 0\,\,{\text{and}}\,\,t^{2} = 0\,\). The shape factors are \(2q_{1}\) and \(q_{1} (q_{1} - 1)\) for u(t), while \(2q_{2}\) and \(q_{2} (q_{2} - 1)\) for v(t) respectively. It is observed for \(q_{1} = q_{2} = 1\), the 3rd factor vanishes, and the shape factor value becomes 2.
2.2 2nd form of the novel NTO-PEFS
System (3) takes the form by using the Eq. (6) is
The derivative form of the Eq. (11) is given as:
Using the Eq. (12), the simplified form of the Eq. (11) is taken as:
The associated BCs are written as:
The system (13) and (14) shows the second form of the novel NTO-PEFS. \(q_{1}\) and \(q_{2}\) are the shape factor and pantograph expressions appear twice in the first and second terms of the Eq. (11). For both u(t) and v(t), the parameters of pantographs are noticed in the 1st and 2nd forms of novel NTO-PEFS, while the single singular point and shape factor are also noticed in other terms of presented NTO-PEFS.
3 Methodology
The methodology based on the LMB neural network approach consists of two stages; in the first stage, essential explanations are provided to create the dataset for the proposed LMB neural network approach, whereas in the second stage, an execution procedure for the proposed LMB neural network approach is defined.
As compared to traditional deterministic numerical and analytical solution techniques, the intelligent computing based proposed LMB are recently introduced mythologies for solving the ODEs/PDEs based problems without even interfering in to simple system by the use transformation. Normally in these methods, whole solution starts from an element known as artificial neuron, which is responsible for picking up the input and then multiplying this input with the suitable weights to get the results continually adding them with the involvement of log-sigmoidal activation function. These solution approximation methodologies consist of three basic layers i.e., input layer, hidden layer and output layer.
Implementing/execution of these type of computing solvers is exploited in the presented study by utilizing the strength of LMB neural network to scrutinize the solution of novel nonlinear third order (NTO) pantograph Emden–Fowler system (PEFS), i.e., (NTO-PEFS) together with its two forms. These network models represent the highly nonlinear ODEs terms and with ease to handle the singularity as well as delay. Thus the proposed LMB based neural networks provides an alternate, precise and reliable solution methodology for NTO-PEFS. Also, the presented technique produces unmatched fast convergent outcomes with reliability and stability as compared to other existing traditional techniques due to nonlinearity, singularity and delays. The approximate solutions obtained by these methods are seem generally reliable, stable, and swift convergence. The proposed neural networks methods proved to be accurate, reliable and robust having the capabilities to predict the expected feature outcomes based on testing, training and validation processes. Recently, several researchers have been considering intelligent computing algorithms/paradigms for solving nonlinear stiff systems arising in variety of domain of applied science and technology (Fig. 1).
In this study, Fig. 2 shows the process of the workflow and the reference results, i.e., datasets of LMB neural network approach. Figure 3 represents a single neuron system in neural network approach, while the proposed LMB neural network approach is executed using ‘nftool’ in the Matlab software package along with the setting of suitable testing data, hidden neurons, validation/training data and learning schemes. The settings of parameter of the networks, i.e., percentage of 80, 10 and 10 of arbitrary selected samples for respective training, testing and validation sets, 10 number of hidden neurons, single input and two vectors, is done with care, exhaustive simulation, experience and knowledge of the solver as well as optimization paradigm. The best compromise between accuracy and complexity to avoid the over-fitting/under-fitting scenarios is incorporated for finding the solution NTO-PEFS with proposed LMB based neural networks. Additionally, the exact solution of NTO-PEFS are used as reference dataset for LMB because of non-availability of numerical method that can simultaneous handle the nonlinearity, singularity as well as pantograph types of the delay.
4 Numerical interpretations
Six different variants of both the forms of the novel NTO-PEFS treated numerically through the LMB neural network. The examples (1–3) show the first form, while the rest of the examples show the second form.
Example 1:
Consider the doubly singular nonlinear third order pantograph Emden–Fowler system is shown as:
associated to the BCs
The true/exact form of the solution is \(\left[ {1 + t^{3} ,1 - t^{3} } \right].\)
Example 2:
Suppose the doubly singular third order pantograph Emden–Fowler system involving exponential function is shown as:
associated to the BCs
The true solutions of Eq. (16) are \(\left[ {1 + t^{3} e^{t} ,1 - t^{3} e^{t} } \right].\)
Example 3:
Consider the doubly singular nonlinear third order pantograph Emden–Fowler system having trigonometric function is shown as:
associated to the BCs
The exact/true solution of Eq. (17) is \(\left[ {1 + t^{3} \cos t,1 - t^{3} \cos t} \right].\)
Example 4:
Consider a singular nonlinear third order pantograph Emden–Fowler system having trigonometric function is shown as:
associated to the BCs
The exact/true solution of (18) is \(\left[ {1 + \sin t,1 - \sin t} \right].\)
Example 5:
Consider a singular nonlinear third order pantograph Emden–Fowler system having exponential function is shown as:
associated to the BCs
The exact/true solution of (19) is \(\left[ {1 + t + t^{3} e^{t} ,1 + t - t^{3} e^{t} } \right].\)
Example 6:
Consider a singular nonlinear third order pantograph Emden–Fowler system having exponential function is shown as:
associated to the BCs
The exact/true solution of (19) is \(\left[ {1 + t + t^{3} ,1 + t - t^{3} } \right].\)
The proposed results are calculated based LMB neural network in 0 to 1 with 0.01 step size for each problem of novel NTO-PEFS. LMB neural network is implemented to solve all examples of both forms of the novel NTO-PEFS given in the system (15–20) using ‘nftool’ with 80% training data, 10 neurons and 10% testing/validation based LMB optimization scheme. The designed neural network is obtainable in Fig. 3.
The obtained numerical result through LMB neural network for all examples of both forms of the novel NTO-PEFS are presented in Figs. Figs. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19 ,20. The NTO-PEFS results for the state of transition/ performance are plotted in Figs. 4 and 5. The MSE for training, testing, best curve and validation are presented for each example of both the categories of the novel NTO-PEFS are drawn in Fig. 4. The best performances are calculated at epochs 364, 634, 72, 204, 1000 and 453 are calculated around 2.8447 × 10–10, 4.7013 × 10–09, 7.0144 × 10–10, 7.4597 × 10–12, 1.8709 × 10–10 and 3.7001 × 10–10, respectively. The gradient and Mu value of LMB are performed for each example of both forms are [9.9733 × 10–08, 9.9905 × 10–08, 9.9014 × 10–08, 9.9279 × 10–08, 3.8021 × 10–07 and 9.9857 × 10–08] and [10–08, 10–08, 10–09, 10–11, 10–08 and 10–08] plotted in Fig. 5. These plots specify the correctness, as well as convergence of the LMB neural networks for each example of both form of the NTO-PEFS. Figures 6–11 authenticate the fitting plots for each example of both form of the NTO-PEFS. These Figures designate the results comparison obtained by the LMB neural network with the reference dataset of exact solutions for each example of both form of the NTO-PEFS. The testing/training and validation of the LMB neural network lie around 10–04 to 10–06 each example of both form of the NTO-PEFS. Figure 12 shows the plots of the error histograms (EHs) to examine the error investigation using the input/output grids for each example of both form of the NTO-PEFS. The EHs with zero-line reference are calculated 8.90 × 10–06, − 7.7 × 10–07, -2.0 × 10–06, −4.2 × 10–07, − 5.3 × 10–06 and 1.5 × 10–05 for all examples of the novel NTO-PEFS.
The regression investigations are plotted in Figs. 13–18 for each example of both form of the NTO-PEFS. These investigations via co-relation are applied to conduct the regression analysis. It is seen that correlation values (R) are found to be 1, that indicates the perfect system, which clearly shows the correctness of LMB-neural network for the novel NTO-PEFS. Furthermore, the MSE convergence is achieved for validation, training, testing, backpropagation procedures, performance executed epochs are shown in Tables 1 for NTO-PEFS.
The proposed results (LMB neural network) have been compared for all examples of both categories of the novel NTO-PEFS is given in Fig. 19. The first category results are provided based Examples 1–3 are provided in Fig. 19a–b, whereas the second form is provided in Fig. 19c–d. It is observed that the obtained outcomes overlapped to the exact solutions for both forms of the novel NTO-PEFS. This results comparison indicates the precision and excellence of the designed LMB neural network scheme. The AE values for all examples of the novel NTO-PEFS is plotted in Fig. 20. Examples 1–3 indicate the AE values are plotted in Fig. 20 (a-b), whereas Examples 4–6 are drawn in Fig. 20 (c-d). It is observed that AE values for Example 1–3 based form 1 for u(t) and v(t) lie in the interval [10–04, 10–06]. Whereas the AE values for Example 1, 2 and 3 based form 1 for uinput [10–04, 10–07]. These obtained outcomes improve the worth of the designed LMB neural network approach.
5 Conclusions
In this research study, a novel third order nonlinear pantograph Emden–Fowler system is designed successfully along with its two forms. The descriptions of the shape factor, pantographs and singular points are also provided for the designed model. The singular systems are always difficult to solve due to the nature of singularity and when the pantograph term is involved with the singular models then it becomes more stiffer in nature, Therefore, stochastic numerical schemes can be applied to solve such models as these schemes are familiar to solve various difficult and harder nature problems. Three different examples of both forms are presented based on the designed model and numerically treated by using efficient designed LMB neural networks. The reference 80% data are used for training, while for both validation and testing outputs, the data are used 10% along with 10 hidden numbers of neurons. To check the precision and perfection, the matching of the achieved simulations from the proposed LMB neural network scheme with the reference solutions is performed. One can prove the values based absolute error are close to 10–04 to 10–08 for each problem to solve the designed NTO-PEFS using the stochastic procedures. For convergence processes, the values based on mean square error of training, testing, validation, and best curve are indicated for each example of the novel NTO-PEFS. The correlation values are applied to form the regression studies are also examined. The gradient together with the LMB are considered for the novel NTO-PEFS. Furthermore, the precision is further verified using the numerical/graphical demonstrations of regression and convergence plots on MSE index.
In the future, various types of differential and fractional singular systems (Fateh et al. 2019; Khan et al. 2021a, 2021b; Qureshi and Yusuf 2020; Sabir et al. 2022d; Umar et al. 2020c; Qureshi et al. 2020) can be assembled using the traditional Emden–Fowler system and solved by the strength of the supervised form of the neural networks.
References
Abazari, N. and Abazari, R., 2009, October. Solution of nonlinear second-order pantograph equations via differential transformation method. In Proceedings of World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology (Vol. 58, pp. 1052–1056).
Abbas F et al (2019) Approximate solutions to Lane–Emden equation for stellar configuration. Appl Math Inform Sci 13:143–152
Adel W et al (2020) Solving a new design of nonlinear second-order Lane–Emden pantograph delay differential model via Bernoulli collocation method. Euro Phys J plus 135(6):427
Ahmad I et al (2017) Neural network methods to solve the Lane–Emden type equations arising in thermodynamic studies of the spherical gas cloud model. Neural Comput Appl 28(1):929–944
Ahmad I et al. (2020) Integrated neuro-evolution-based computing solver for dynamics of nonlinear corneal shape model numerically. Neural Comput Appl pp 1–17.
Angelov PP, Gu X (2019) Empirical approach to machine learning. Springer, New York
Angelov PP, Gu X, Príncipe JC (Oct. 2018) A generalized methodology for data analysis. IEEE Trans Cybernet 48(10):2981–2993. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCYB.2017.2753880
Bender CM, Milton KA, Pinsky SS, Simmons LM Jr (1989) A new perturbative approach to nonlinear problems. J Math Phys 30(7):1447–1455
Benhammouda, B., Vazquez-Leal, H. and Hernandez-Martinez, L., 2014. Procedure for exact solutions of nonlinear pantograph delay differential equations. Journal of Advances in Mathematics and Computer Science, pp.2738–2751.
Botmart T, Sabir Z, Raja MAZ, Weera W, Sadat R, Ali MR (2022) A numerical study of the fractional order dynamical nonlinear susceptible infected and quarantine differential model using the stochastic numerical approach. Fractal Fractional 6(3):139
Bukhari AH et al (2020) Design of a hybrid NAR-RBFs neural network for nonlinear dusty plasma system. Alex Eng J 59(5):3325–3345
Chandrasekhar S (1967) An Introduction to the study of stellar structure. Dover Publications, New York
Dehghan M, Shakeri F (2008) Solution of an integro-differential equation arising in oscillating magnetic fields using He’s homotopy perturbation method. Progress Electromagnetics Res 78:361–376
Derfel G, Iserles A (1997) The pantograph equation in the complex plane. J Math Anal Appl 213(1):117–132
Dizicheh, A.K., Salahshour, S., Ahmadian, A. and Baleanu, D., 2020. A novel algorithm based on the Legendre wavelets spectral technique for solving the Lane–Emden equations. Applied Numerical Mathematics.
J. D\v{z}urina, S.R. Grace, I. Jadlovsk\'{a}, and T. Li, Oscillation criteria for second-order Emden--Fowler delay differential equations with a sublinear neutral term, Math. Nachr. 293 (2020), 1--13. https://doi.org/10.1002/mana.201800196.
Fateh MF et al (2019) Differential evolution based computation intelligence solver for elliptic partial differential equations. Front Inform Technol Electron Eng 20(10):1445–1456
Feng, X., 2013. An analytic study on the multi-pantograph delay equations with variable coefficients. Bulletin mathématique de la Société des Sciences Mathématiques de Roumanie, pp.205–215.
Flockerzi, D. and Sundmacher, K., 2011. On coupled Lane–Emden equations arising in dusty fluid models. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 268, No. 1, p. 012006). IOP Publishing.
Ghergu M, Radulescu V (2007) On a class of singular Gierer-Meinhardt systems arising in morphogenesis. Comptes Rendus Mathématique 344(3):163–168
Guirao JL, Sabir Z, Saeed T (2020) Design and numerical solutions of a novel third-order nonlinear emden–fowler delay differential model. Math Prob Eng 2020.
Hashemi MS, Akgül A, Inc M, Mustafa IS, Baleanu D (2017) Solving the Lane–Emden equation within a reproducing kernel method and group preserving scheme. Mathematics 5(4):77
Jadoon I et al. (2020) Design of evolutionary optimized finite difference based numerical computing for dust density model of nonlinear Van-der Pol Mathieu’s oscillatory systems. Math Comput Simul
Jadoon I et al. (2020) Integrated meta-heuristics finite difference method for the dynamics of nonlinear unipolar electrohydrodynamic pump flow model. Appl Soft Comput, p 106791.
Keskin Y, Kurnaz A, Kiris ΜE, Oturanc G (2007) Approximate solutions of generalized pantograph equations by the differential transform method. Int J Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 8(2):159–164
Khan JA et al (2015) Nature-inspired computing approach for solving non-linear singular Emden-Fowler problem arising in electromagnetic theory. Connect Sci 27(4):377–396
Khan A, Zarin R, Hussain G, Ahmad NA, Mohd MH, Yusuf A (2021a) Stability analysis and optimal control of covid-19 with convex incidence rate in Khyber Pakhtunkhawa (Pakistan). Results Phys 20:103703
Khan K, Zarin R, Khan A, Yusuf A, Al-Shomrani M, Ullah A (2021b) Stability analysis of five-grade Leishmania epidemic model with harmonic mean-type incidence rate. Adv Differ Equ 2021(1):1–27
Koroma MA, Zhan C, Kamara AF, Sesay AB (2013) Laplace decomposition approximation solution for a system of multi-pantograph equations. Int J Math Comput Sci Eng 7(7):39–44
Kuang, Y. ed., 1993. Delay differential equations: with applications in population dynamics (Vol. 191). Academic press.
Li DS, Liu MZ (2000) Exact solution properties of a multi-pantograph delay differential equation. J Harbin Inst Technol 32(3):1–3
Li W, Chen B, Meng C, Fang W, Xiao Y, Li X, Hu Z, Xu Y, Tong L, Wang H, Liu W (2014) Ultrafast all-optical graphene modulator. Nano Lett 14(2):955–959
Li T et al (2017) Oscillation criteria for second-order superlinear Emden-Fowler neutral differential equations. Monatshefte Für Mathematik 184(3):489–500
Li D et al (2018) Lane-Emden equation with inertial force and general polytropic dynamic model for molecular cloud cores. Mon Not R Astron Soc 473(2):2441–2464
Liu MZ, Li D (2004) Properties of analytic solution and numerical solution of multi-pantograph equation. Appl Math Comput 155(3):853–871
Luo T et al (2016) Nonlinear asymptotic stability of the Lane–Emden solutions for the viscous gaseous star problem with degenerate density dependent viscosities. Commun Math Phys 347(3):657–702
Ma WX (2020) Inverse scattering for nonlocal reverse-time nonlinear Schrödinger equations. Appl Math Lett 102:106161
Ma WX (2021a) Inverse scattering and soliton solutions of nonlocal reverse-spacetime nonlinear Schrödinger equations. Proc Am Math Soc 149(1):251–263
Ma WX (2021b) N-soliton solution and the Hirota condition of a (2+ 1)-dimensional combined equation. Math Comput Simul 190:270–279
Ma, W.X., 2021c. N-soliton solutions and the Hirota conditions in (1+ 1)-dimensions. International Journal of Nonlinear Sciences and Numerical Simulation.
Mandelzweig VB, Tabakin F (2001) Quasi linearization approach to nonlinear problems in physics with application to nonlinear ODEs. Comput Phys Commun 141(2):268–281
Mehmood A et al (2020) Integrated computational intelligent paradigm for nonlinear electric circuit models using neural networks, genetic algorithms and sequential quadratic programming. Neural Comput Appl 32(14):10337–10357
Niculescu, S.I., 2001. Delay effects on stability: a robust control approach (Vol. 269). Springer Science & Business Media.
Nouh MI (2004) Accelerated power series solution of polytropic and isothermal gas spheres. New Astron 9(6):467–473
Qureshi S, Yusuf A, Aziz S (2020) On the use of Mohand integral transform for solving fractional-order classical Caputo differential equations. J Appl Math Comput Mech 19(3).
Qureshi S, Yusuf A (2020) A new third order convergent numerical solver for continuous dynamical systems. J King Saud Univ-Sci 32(2):1409–1416
Rach R et al (2014) Solving coupled Lane–Emden boundary value problems in catalytic diffusion reactions by the Adomian decomposition method. J Math Chem 52(1):255–267
Radulescu V, Repovs D (2012) Combined effects in nonlinear problems arising in the study of anisotropic continuous media. Nonlinear Anal Theory Methods Appl 75(3):1524–1530
Raja MAZ et al (2018) A new stochastic computing paradigm for the dynamics of nonlinear singular heat conduction model of the human head. Euro Phys J plus 133(9):364
Raja MAZ, Manzar MA, Shah SM, Chen Y (2020) Integrated intelligence of fractional neural networks and sequential quadratic programming for Bagley–Torvik systems arising in fluid mechanics. J Comput Nonlinear Dyn 15(5).
Ramos JI (2003) Linearization methods in classical and quantum mechanics. Comput Phys Commun 153(2):199–208
Ramos JI (2008) Series approach to the Lane–Emden equation and comparison with the homotopy perturbation method. Chaos, Solitons Fractals 38(2):400–408
Saadatmandi A, Dehghan M (2009) Variational iteration method for solving a generalized pantograph equation. Comput Math Appl 58(11–12):2190–2196
Sabir, Z., et al., 2020a. Novel design of Morlet wavelet neural network for solving second order Lane–Emden equation. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation
Sabir Z et al (2020a) Integrated intelligent computing with neuro-swarming solver for multi-singular fourth-order nonlinear Emden-Fowler equation. Comput Appl Math 39(4):1–18
Sabir Z, Sakar MG, Yeskindirova M, Saldir O (2020b) Numerical investigations to design a novel model based on the fifth order system of Emden–Fowler equations. Theor Appl Mech Lett 10(5):333–342
Sabir, Z., et al., 2020b. Intelligence computing approach for solving second order system of Emden–Fowler model. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy SystemsS, pp.1–16.
Sabir, Z., Wahab, H. A., Nguyen, T. G., Altamirano, G. C., Erdoğan, F., & Ali, M. R. (2022a). Intelligent computing technique for solving singular multi-pantograph delay differential equation. Soft Computing, 1–13..
Sabir, Z., Wahab, H. A., Ali, M. R., & Sadat, R. (2022b). Neuron Analysis of the Two-Point Singular Boundary Value Problems Arising in the Thermal Explosion’s Theory. Neural Processing Letters, 1–28.
Sabir Z, Ali MR, Fathurrochman I, Raja MAZ, Sadat R, Baleanu D (2022c). Dynamics of multi-point singular fifth-order Lane–Emden system with neuro-evolution heuristics. Evol Syst, 1–12.
Sabir, Z., Ali, M. R., Raja, M. A. Z., Sadat, R., & Baleanu, D. (2022d). Dynamics of three-point boundary value problems with Gudermannian neural networks. Evolutionary Intelligence, 1–13.
Sabir, Z. et al., 2020. On a new model based on third-order nonlinear multi singular functional differential equations. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2020.
Saeed U (2017) Haar Adomian method for the solution of fractional nonlinear Lane–Emden type equations arising in astrophysics. Taiwan J Math 21(5):1175–1192
Sezer M, Şahin N (2008) Approximate solution of multi-pantograph equation with variable coefficients. J Comput Appl Math 214(2):406–416
Shah, Z., et al., 2020. Design of neural network based intelligent computing for neumerical treatment of unsteady 3D flow of Eyring-Powell magneto-nanofluidic model. Journal of Materials Research and Technology.
Shawagfeh NT (1993) Non-perturbative approximate solution for Lane–Emden equation. J Math Phys 34(9):4364–4369
Singh R et al (2019a) Haar wavelet collocation approach for Lane–Emden equations arising in mathematical physics and astrophysics. Euro Phys J plus 134(11):548
Singh R, Shahni J, Garg H, Garg A (2019b) Haar wavelet collocation approach for Lane–Emden equations arising in mathematical physics and astrophysics. European Phys J plus 134(11):548
Umar M et al (2020a) A stochastic computational intelligent solver for numerical treatment of mosquito dispersal model in a heterogeneous environment. Euro Phys J plus 135(7):1–23
Umar M, Sabir Z, Amin F, Guirao JL, Raja MAZ (2020b) Stochastic numerical technique for solving HIV infection model of CD4+ T cells. Euro Phys J plus 135(6):403
Umar M et al (2020c) A stochastic intelligent computing with neuro-evolution heuristics for nonlinear SITR system of novel COVID-19 dynamics. Symmetry 12(10):1628
Soleymani Karimi Vanani, Sedighi Hafshejani and Khan. On the numerical solution of generalized pantograph equation. World Applied Sciences Journal, 13(12):2531–2535, 2011.
Widatalla, S. and Koroma, M.A., 2012. Approximation algorithm for a system of pantograph equations. Journal of Applied Mathematics, 2012.
Zhao T (1995) Global periodic-solutions for a differential delay system modeling a microbial population in the chemostat. J Math Anal Appl 193(1):329–352
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Sabir, Z., Raja, M.A.Z., Ali, M.R. et al. An advance computational intelligent approach to solve the third kind of nonlinear pantograph Lane–Emden differential system. Evolving Systems 14, 393–412 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12530-022-09469-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12530-022-09469-7