Abstract
Purpose
Obesity and its associated medical problems increase risk of kidney function decline while prior studies suggest that bariatric surgery may improve kidney outcomes. However, little is known about the comparative effectiveness of different types of bariatric surgery on kidney function. In this study, we compare the effects of laparoscopic one anastomosis gastric bypass (LOAGB) and laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) on kidney function one year after surgery.
Materials and Methods
The patients’ demographic, medical, and surgical data were prospectively collected and retrospectively reviewed. Type 2 diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dyslipidemia, body mass index (BMI), and kidney function tests were obtained before and one year after surgery. Kidney function was evaluated by estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and spot urine albumin to creatinine ratio (ACR). Changes in eGFR and ACR were compared between LRYGB vs. LOAGB after adjustment for confounders (age, sex, remission of associated medical problems, preoperative BMI, and percentage of excess BMI loss) using ANCOVA model.
Results
Both surgical techniques significantly decreased the post-surgery presence of diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia (p < 0.001 for all paired comparisons). The eGFR level significantly increased and the ACR level significantly decreased in both groups (p < 0.001 for all paired comparisons before and after adjustment). However, eGFR and ACR mean differences between LRYGB and LOAGB were not significantly different after adjustment for confounding variables (p = 0.9 and 0.4, respectively).
Conclusion
Both LOAGB and LRYGB improved 1-year eGFR and ACR equally independently from weight loss and other confounders.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Obesity is recognized as a global health crisis, currently impacting approximately one third of the world’s population, and prevalence continuing to rise sharply [1,2,3,4,5]. With widespread impacts on multiple physiological mechanisms in the body, obesity increases the risk of cardiovascular disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), kidney dysfunction, and even cancer [3, 4]. While multiple studies demonstrate that obesity is an independent risk factor for chronic kidney disease (CKD) [6], this association may be less recognized by clinicians [7]. Potential pathophysiologic mechanisms include worsened hypertension (HTN) [8, 9], blood glucose, inflammation, dysregulation of adipocytokines, the autonomic nervous system, and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system [10, 11].
Bariatric surgery (BS) is now well-recognized as the most effective and sustainable method for substantial weight loss in patients with severe obesity [1,2,3,4,5]. Beyond weight loss, BS is very effective at inducing T2DM and HTN remission [8, 9, 12,13,14], as well as improving kidney function in patients with obesity-induced kidney dysfunction [6, 7, 10, 11, 14, 15]. Prior studies have found that BS prevents CKD in patients with normal kidney function while normalizing estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in BS candidates with hyperfiltration or decreased renal function category [14, 15]. The largest increase in eGFR appears to occur in those with lower baseline kidney function [10, 11, 15,16,17,18,19]. However, some kidney complications have been reported after BS, which are undeniable and associations between kidney function and BS may differ by type of surgery [10, 11, 15,16,17,18,19].
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) and laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass (LOAGB) are two types of gastric bypass surgeries with significant weight loss [13, 20,21,22,23]. Although LOAGB is newer than LRYGB, many studies have examined and compared the effects of LRYGB and LOAGB on weight loss, body mass index (BMI), and metabolic factors [13, 17, 19, 24,25,26,27]. It was observed that LOAGB patients may experience sharper trajectory of weight loss than LRYGB due to longer biliopancreatic limb (BPL), which may rarely cause malnutrition, liver failure, and kidney complications [28, 29]. It has been reported by meta-analysis and long-term studies that weight loss and T2DM remission rate after LOAGB are higher than LRYGB but remission of HTN was similar in both groups, which could impact future kidney function [26, 27, 30]. Non-inferiority analysis of the YOMEGA trial revealed that LRYGB is not inferior to LOAGB in terms of 2-year weight loss, and besides its 2-year missing data, complete and partial T2DM remission rate were 60% and 10%, respectively, in the LOAGB group vs. 38% and 6%, respectively, in the LRYGB group, although this finding was not statistically significant (p = 0.28) [13].
As there appear to be differences in metabolic effect between LOAGB and LRYGB, it remains unknown which surgical technique provides the best renoprotective effects [31]. Comparative effectiveness of LRYGB vs. sleeve gastrectomy (SG) [32] and LOAGB vs. SG [33] have been investigated in a few studies. No study has ever compared the effects of LOAGB vs. LRYGB on eGFR and albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR), and for each type of surgery, prior studies have incompletely adjusted for confounders or potential mediators such as remission of T2DM, HTN, or amount of weight loss [34]. Therefore, this study aimed to (1) compare the effects of LRYGB vs. LOAGB on eGFR and ACR one year after BS and (2) adjusted the kidney outcomes with potential mediating variables.
Materials and Methods
Design and Participants
This analysis used prospective cohort study of 2538 patients with severe obesity from 2015 to 2019. Their eligibility for BS were evaluated in the Isfahan University-affiliated Centers for Bariatric Surgery. Institutional review board certification was received before commencing this study and written informed consent was obtained from all patients before surgery. The 2016 IFSO Position Statements and 2012 Interdisciplinary European Guidelines on Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery and their later amendments were used as our surgical criteria [35]. Choosing the preferred surgical technique was based on patient willingness, preoperative evaluations, associated medical problems, and the surgeon’s opinion. Detailed surgical procedures have been reported previously [28, 36,37,38]; however, in brief, for the LRYGB, a 7–10-cm gastric pouch with approximate volume of 30 cc, an alimentary limb of 60 cm, and a BPL of 130 cm were created, and for the LOAGB, a 18–20-cm gastric pouch with approximate volume of 50 cc and a gastrojejunal anastomosis 180 cm from Treitz ligament were created.
A total of 1986 patients underwent BS between January 2015 and December 2019 including 973 patients who underwent gastric bypass procedures. Patients were included in this study if they were aged 20–50 years, underwent either LRYGB or LOAGB for the first time, and had body mass index (BMI) 40–60 kg/m2 or BMI 35–40 kg/m2 with the presence of a obesity-associated medical problem (i.e., HTN and/or T2DM). Exclusion criteria included history of other bariatric procedures, any history of kidney disease, nephrolithiasis, heart failure, pregnancy, malignancy, uncontrolled psychological disorders, preoperative eGFR below 60 milliliters per minute per 1.73 square meter as body surface area (mL/min/1.73 m2), preoperative macroalbuminuria (ACR > 300 milligrams per gram (mg/g)), or incomplete clinical/ biochemical data. To decrease selection bias, patients were matched for age, sex, preoperative obesity-associated medical problems (HTN, T2DM, and dyslipidemia (DLP)), and baseline kidney function tests (eGFR and ACR).
A checklist including demographic data, type of the gastric bypass, presence of associated medical problems, and kidney function tests were obtained before and 12 months after the surgery. The percentage of excess BMI loss (%EBMIL) from 25 kg/m2 was used as the weight-related variable for statistical analysis. A blood sample constituting fasting blood glucose, lipid profile, creatinine (Cr), and a morning mid-stream urine sample were collected before and 12 months after the surgery.
American Diabetes Association 2015 report and its later amendments were used to diagnose, confirm, and define complete remission of T2DM [39]. The 2013 European Society of Hypertension and European Society of Cardiology report for HTN management and its later amendments were used to diagnose, confirm, manage, and define remission of HTN [40]. DLP was defined based on Adult Treatment Panel III cholesterol guideline [41].
The Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) formula was used to calculate the eGFR [42]. Then, eGFR categories were defined as eGFR ≥ 125 mL/min/1.73 m2 as hyperfiltration (G0), 90 ≤ eGFR ≤ 124 as normal (G1), 60 ≤ eGFR ≤ 89 as decreased kidney function (G2), and eGFR ≤ 59 as CKD (G3). ACR was measured in a morning mid-stream urine sample and its categories were defined as ACR < 30 mg/g as normal albumin excretion (A1) and 30 ≤ ACR ≤ 300 mg/g as microalbuminuria (A2) [19]. Improvement in eGFR and ACR were defined as coming to G1 category from another category and A2 to A1, respectively. Worsening in eGFR is when the postoperative eGFR was anything besides G1.
Statistical Analysis
Data was imported to the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) software version 22.0 (IBM Corp., USA). Data were stratified by the gastric bypass type (LRYGB or LOAGB). Continuous and categorical data were presented as mean and standard deviation (SD) and frequency (percentage), respectively. The normality of continuous data was evaluated using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and the Q-Q plot, and non-normally distributed data were log-transformed. Categorical data were compared between groups using the chi-square test. Bonferroni correction was used and reported in case of finding significant difference. Paired t-test was used to compare before-after changes for each numerical variable in each surgical group. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was used for comparing continuous variables when adjustment was made for confounding variables (i.e. age, sex, remission of T2DM, HTN, and DLP, preoperative BMI, and %EBMIL). The p value (two-tailed) < 0.05 was considered as a significant level.
Results
A total of 600 out of 851 LRYGB and LOAGB patients (300 patients for each group) fulfilled the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Participants’ baseline characteristics are summarized in Table 1. No significant difference was observed between LRYGB and LOAGB groups.
Paired comparisons of each variable in either surgical groups are shown in Table 2. Although both surgical techniques significantly decreased the prevalence of T2DM, HTN, and DLP (all p values were < 0.001) (Table 2), T2DM remission was significantly higher in LRYGB (p = 0.01) and HTN remission was significantly higher in LOAGB (p = 0.015) (Table 3). BMI significantly decreased in both groups (p < 0.001) (Table 2); however, delta-BMI and percentage of EBMIL one year after surgery were not significantly different between two gastric bypasses (p = 0.49 and 0.27, respectively) (Table 3).
The eGFR level significantly increased and the ACR level significantly decreased in both groups (p < 0.001 for all paired comparisons before and after adjustment) (Table 2). Furthermore, the frequency of eGFR and ACR categories for each surgical group were significantly changed (Table 2). However, eGFR and ACR mean differences between LRYGB and LOAGB were not significantly different before (p = 0.18 and 0.21, respectively) and after adjustment for confounding variables (Table 3). The frequency of improvement/no-change/worsening in eGFR and ACR was not significantly different between LRYGB and LOAGB (Table 3).
Discussion
The most important findings of this study were that (1) eGFR significantly increased and ACR significantly decreased after both types of gastric bypasses and (2) no significant difference was found between them before and after adjustment for confounders. Therefore, both surgical techniques appeared to be equally effective in improving kidney function parameters independent from weight loss and remissions of associated medical problems.
LOAGB is nearly newer than LRYGB [13]; thus, prior studies in this field have focused primarily on the effects of LRYGB on kidney function [14, 43], have been limited by lack of data on changes in albuminuria, and often have not accounted for remission of hypertension and T2DM, which can impact kidney functions directly. For the first time, we report the effects of LOAGB on kidney function, showing similar beneficial effects on eGFR and ACR compared to LRYGB. This finding of improvement in albuminuria is important as albuminuria is a strong risk factor for future risk of cardiovascular disease and end-stage kidney disease. Studies have suggested that BS normalizes kidney function in patients with baseline hyperfiltration (G0) or with decrease eGFR (G2-G3) [6, 10, 17, 44]. Our findings confirm these observations and extend them to LOAGB.
Previous studies have found that the beneficial effect of BS on eGFR and albuminuria is explained by weight loss, lowering blood pressure, and T2DM remission [14, 16, 45,46,47,48]. Other studies suggest that improvements in albuminuria correlate with improvements in inflammation [16], and that improvements in eGFR correlate with improvements in leptin [49] and diastolic function [46]. In our study we also found that the beneficial effects of LOAGB and LRYGB on the kidney were independent of changes in weight and remission of both HTN and T2DM.
It was revealed in some studies that LOAGB patients may experience higher weight loss [28, 29] and more T2DM remission than LRYGB [13, 26, 27, 30], which all together can impact the future kidney function. However, our findings did not support these hypothesis, which could be attributed to differences in our study population, differences in surgical technique, postoperative follow-up protocol, not including duration, severity, and control of associated medical problems (T2DM, HTN, or DLP), or other unknown factors. We did observe a trend towards greater %EBMIL and delta-BMI in LOAGB but there was no significant difference compared to LRYGB. T2DM remission was significantly higher in LRYGB and HTN remission was significantly higher in LOAGB. Although discrepancy in T2DM and HTN remissions may affect the changes in eGFR and ACR, kidney function improvement was distinct from remissions in associated medical problems similar to a study by Chang et al. [50].
Regarding the eGFR changes in other researches, 78% of the hyperfiltration group and 85% of the G3 group in Coupaye et al. study [10] and 63.2% of the hyperfiltration group and 82.4% of the G3 group in Magalhaes et al. study [17] had kidney function improvement. Like these changes, 84.1% of the A2 group improve to A1 in Holcomb et al. study [6]. Altogether, BS can normalize the eGFR and ACR in patients with pathologic renal function and albuminuria; nevertheless, there are still some patients who do not benefit from this phenomenon, which needs more investigation [44, 51].
There were some limitations but also many strengths in our research. One limitation, similar to most surgical studies, is the lack of measured GFR. Albuminuria was only measured as a single ACR sample, although it is a valid variable; we recommend 24-h urine collection. A high proportion were females though this was similar in both groups and other bariatric surgery cohorts. We lacked long-term follow-up as renal function tests were obtained one year after the surgery; long-term follow-up might reveal different findings [21, 52]. Discrepancy in T2DM and HTN remissions between two groups may affect the way we concluded and analyzed eGFR and ACR. While we were able to adjust for many confounding variables, we did not include duration, severity, and control of associated medical problems as well as their consuming medications. Regardless, our study was strengthened by our large study sample size, the systematic capture of those associated medical problems, and including ACR, which is often missing in other studies. Findings provide important data supporting similar beneficial effects of LOAGB and LRYGB techniques on kidney function, which have never been compared previously but needs more investigations and stronger analysis.
Conclusion
Although the severity and durations of associated medical problems were not captured and T2DM and HTN remissions were different between groups, both LOAGB and LRYGB can significantly and equally improve eGFR and albuminuria, independent of their beneficial effects on BMI, T2DM, HTN, and DLP.
References
Chooi YC, Ding C, Magkos F. The epidemiology of obesity. Metabolism. Elsevier Inc.; 2019;92:6–10. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2018.09.005.
Sayadi Shahraki M, Khalili N, Yousefvand S, Sheikhbahaei E, Shahabi Shahmiri S. Severe obesity and vitamin D deficiency treatment options before bariatric surgery: a randomized clinical trial. Surg Obes Relat Dis. Elsevier Inc.; 2019;15:1604–11. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2019.05.033.
Kim DD, Basu A. Estimating the medical care costs of obesity in the United States: systematic review, meta-analysis, and empirical analysis. Value Heal. Elsevier; 2016;19:602–13. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2016.02.008.
Rahmani A, Sayehmiri K, Asadollahi K, et al. Investigation of the prevalence of obesity in Iran: a systematic review and meta-analysis study. Acta Med Iran. 2015;53:596–607.
Afshin A, Forouzanfar MH, Reitsma MB, et al. Health effects of overweight and obesity in 195 countries over 25 years. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:13–27.
Holcomb CN, Goss LE, Almehmi A, et al. Bariatric surgery is associated with renal function improvement. Surg Endosc. Springer US. 2018;32:276–81.
Chang AR, Grams ME, Ballew SH, et al. Adiposity and risk of decline in glomerular filtration rate: meta-analysis of individual participant data in a global consortium. BMJ. 2019;364
Schiavon CA, Bersch-Ferreira AC, Santucci EV, et al. Effects of bariatric surgery in obese patients with hypertension the GATEWAY randomized trial (gastric bypass to treat obese patients with steady hypertension). Circulation. 2018;137:1132–42.
Schiavon CA, Bhatt DL, Ikeoka D, et al. Three-year outcomes of bariatric surgery in patients with obesity and hypertension: a randomized clinical trial. Ann Intern Med. 2020;173:685–93.
Coupaye M, Flamant M, Sami O, Calabrese D, Msika S, Bogard C, et al. Determinants of evolution of glomerular filtration rate after bariatric surgery: a 1-year observational study. Obes Surg. 2017;27:126–33. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2260-7.
D’Agati VD, Chagnac A, De Vries APJ, Levi M, Porrini E, Herman-Edelstein M, et al. Obesity-related glomerulopathy: clinical and pathologic characteristics and pathogenesis. Nat Rev Nephrol. Nature Publishing Group; 2016;12:453–71. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/nrneph.2016.75.
Cohen RV, Pereira TV, Aboud CM, et al. Microvascular Outcomes after Metabolic Surgery (MOMS) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and class I obesity: rationale and design for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e013574.
Robert M, Espalieu P, Pelascini E, et al. Efficacy and safety of one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity (YOMEGA): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2019;393:1299–309.
Cohen RV, Pereira TV, Aboud CM, et al. Effect of gastric bypass vs best medical treatment on early-stage chronic kidney disease in patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2020;155:1–11.
Imam TH, Fischer H, Jing B, Burchette R, Henry S, DeRose SF, et al. Estimated GFR before and after bariatric surgery in CKD. Am J Kidney Dis. Elsevier Inc; 2017;69:380–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.09.020.
Park S, Kim YJ, Choi CY, et al. Bariatric surgery can reduce albuminuria in patients with severe obesity and normal kidney function by reducing systemic inflammation. Obes Surg. 2018;28:831–7.
Magalhães DSC, Pedro JMP, Souteiro PEB, et al. Analyzing the impact of bariatric surgery in kidney function: a 2-year observational study. Obes Surg. 2019;29:197–206.
Ngoh CLY, So JBY, Tiong HY, Shabbir A, Teo BW. Effect of weight loss after bariatric surgery on kidney function in a multiethnic Asian population. Surg Obes Relat Dis. Elsevier; 2016;12:600–5. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2015.07.003.
Hou CC, Shyu RS, Lee WJ, Ser KH, Lee YC, Chen SC. Improved renal function 12 months after bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. Elsevier Inc.; 2013;9:202–6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2012.10.005.
Carbajo MA, Luque-de-León E, Jiménez JM, et al. Laparoscopic one-anastomosis gastric bypass: technique, results, and long-term follow-up in 1200 patients. Obes Surg. 2017;27:1153–67.
Lee WJ, Ser KH, Lee YC, et al. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y vs. mini-gastric bypass for the treatment of morbid obesity: a 10-year experience. Obes Surg. 2012;22:1827–34.
Spivak H, Munz Y, Rubin M, Raz I, Shohat T, Blumenfeld O. Omega-loop gastric bypass is more effective for weight loss but negatively impacts liver enzymes: a registry-based comprehensive first-year analysis. Surg Obes Relat Dis. Elsevier Inc.; 2018;14:175–80. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2017.11.006.
Garcia MS, Calderoni DR, Jimenez LS, et al. Renal function 1 year after bariatric surgery: influence of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and identification of pre-operative predictors of improvement. Obes Surg. 2020;30:860–6.
Schauer PR, Kashyap SR, Wolski K, et al. Bariatric surgery versus intensive medical therapy in obese patients with diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2012;366:1567–76.
Kim EY, Kim YJ. Does bariatric surgery really prevent deterioration of renal function? Surg Obes Relat Dis. Elsevier; 2016;12:856–61. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2015.10.068.
Magouliotis DE, Tasiopoulou VS, Tzovaras G. One anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: an updated meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2019;29:2721–30.
Magouliotis DE, Tasiopoulou VS, Tzovaras G. One anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a meta-analysis. Clin Obes. 2018;8:159–69.
Keleidari B, Mahmoudieh M, Shahabi S, Sheikhbahaei E, Rezaei M, Sayadi M, et al. Reversing one-anastomosis gastric bypass surgery due to severe and refractory hypoalbuminemia. World J Surg. Springer International Publishing; 2020;44:1200–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-019-05290-7.
Keleidari B, Mahmoudieh M, Gorgi K, et al. Hepatic failure after bariatric surgery: a systematic review. Hepat Mon. 2019;19:1–16.
Ruiz-Tovar J, Carbajo MA, Jimenez JM, Castro MJ, Gonzalez G, Ortiz-de-Solorzano J, et al. Long-term follow-up after sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass versus one-anastomosis gastric bypass: a prospective randomized comparative study of weight loss and remission of comorbidities. Surg Endosc. Springer US; 2019;33:401–10. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6307-9.
Docherty NG, le Roux C. Bariatric surgery for the treatment of chronic kidney disease in obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nat Rev Nephrol. Springer US; 2020;16:709–20. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-020-0323-4.
Choudhury RA, Hoeltzel G, Prins K, et al. Sleeve gastrectomy compared with gastric bypass for morbidly obese patients with end stage renal disease: a decision analysis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020;24:756–63.
Bassiony AI, Sabry A, Shiha O, et al. The short-term renal effects of bariatric surgery: a comparative study between sleeve gastrectomy and one anastomosis gastric bypass operations among Egyptian patients with severe obesity. Obes Surg. 2020;30:4494–504.
De Luca M, Tie T, Ooi G, et al. Mini gastric bypass-one anastomosis gastric bypass (MGB-OAGB)—IFSO position statement. Obes Surg. 2018;28:1188–206.
De Luca M, Angrisani L, Himpens J, Busetto L, Scopinaro N, Weiner R, et al. Indications for surgery for obesity and weight-related diseases: position statements from the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and metabolic disorders (IFSO). Obes Surg. Obesity Surgery; 2016;26:1659–96. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2271-4.
Keleidari B, Mahmoudieh M, Kafi S, Shahabi S, Sheikhbahaei E, Farahmand A, et al. Which one is better for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or one anastomosis gastric bypass? A paired liver biopsy report. Obes Med. Elsevier Ltd; 2020;18:100205. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obmed.2020.100205.
Mahmoudieh M, Keleidari B, Afshin N, et al. The early results of the laparoscopic mini-gastric bypass/one anastomosis gastric bypass on patients with different body mass index. J Obes. 2020;2020:1–6.
Mahmoudieh M, Keleidari B, Salimi M, Sayadi M, Shahabi S, Sheikhbahaei E. The two different biliopancreatic limb lengths for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Med. Elsevier; 2019;16:100146. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obmed.2019.100146.
American Diabetes Association. 2. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2015;38:S8-16.
Mancia G, Fagard R, Narkiewicz K, et al. 2013 ESH/ESC guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension: the Task Force for the management of arterial hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J. 2013;34:2159–219.
Sadeghi M, Golshahi J, Talaei M, Sheikhbahaei E, Ghodjani E, Mansouri M, et al. 15-Year lipid profile effects on cardiovascular events adjusted for cardiovascular risk factors: a cohort study from Middle-East. Acta Cardiol. Taylor & Francis; 2020;0:1–6. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/00015385.2020.1717096.
Michels WM, Grootendorst DC, Verduijn M, et al. Performance of the Cockcroft-Gault, MDRD, and new CKD-EPI formulas in relation to GFR, age, and body size. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5:1003–9.
Saliba J, Kasim NR, Tamboli RA, Isbell JM, Marks P, Feurer ID, et al. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass reverses renal glomerular but not tubular abnormalities in excessively obese diabetics. Surgery. Mosby, Inc.; 2010;147:282–7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2009.09.017.
Neff KJ, Baud G, Raverdy V, Caiazzo R, Verkindt H, Noel C, et al. Renal function and Remission of hypertension after bariatric surgery: a 5-year prospective cohort study. Obes Surg. Obesity Surgery; 2017;27:613–9. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-016-2333-7.
Friedman AN, Cohen RV. Bariatric surgery as a renoprotective intervention. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2019;28:537–44.
Luaces M, Martínez-Martínez E, Medina M, et al. The impact of bariatric surgery on renal and cardiac functions in morbidly obese patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27:iv53–7.
Fenske WK, Dubb S, Bueter M, Seyfried F, Patel K, Tam FWK, et al. Effect of bariatric surgery-induced weight loss on renal and systemic inflammation and blood pressure: a 12-month prospective study. Surg Obes Relat Dis. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery; 2013;9:559–68. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2012.03.009.
Bilha SC, Nistor I, Nedelcu A, et al. The effects of bariatric surgery on renal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg. 2018;28:3815–33.
Navaneethan SD, Malin SK, Arrigain S, et al. Bariatric surgery, kidney function, insulin resistance, and adipokines in patients with decreased GFR: A cohort study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015;65:345–7.
Chang AR, Chen Y, Still C, Wood GC, Kirchner HL, Lewis M, et al. Bariatric surgery is associated with improvement in kidney outcomes. Kidney Int. Elsevier Inc; 2016;90:164–71. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2016.02.039.
Reid TJ, Saeed S, McCoy S, Osewa AA, Persaud A, Ahmed L. The effect of bariatric surgery on renal function. Surg Obes Relat Dis. Elsevier; 2014;10:808–13. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soard.2014.02.048.
Li K, Zou J, Ye Z, et al. Effects of bariatric surgery on renal function in obese patients: a systematic review and meta analysis. PLoS One. 2016;11:1–18.
Acknowledgments
The authors express their gratitude toward Mr. Amir Salar Moazen Safaei for his kind support through this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Considerations
All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with 1964 Helsinki declarations and its later amendments. The study commenced after receiving its approval with the registration number of “IR.MUI.MED.REC.1397.223” from the Institutional Review Board of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained before surgery from all individual participants included in the study.
Conflict of Interest
All authors declare no potential conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mahmoudieh, M., Keleidari, B., Hadipour, P. et al. Comparative Effectiveness of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass vs. One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass on Kidney Function. OBES SURG 31, 2464–2470 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05295-z
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-021-05295-z