Introduction

The Populus davidiana × Populus bolleana is noteworthy for its adaptability, short growth cycle, and superior wood and thus widely planted for its timber and in forests worldwide (Huang et al. 2012; Nasir and Tanweer 2014). It is important in ecological and environmental restorations and included in afforestations over large portions of arid and semiarid areas in northern China. However, poplar plantation forests can experience several problems including poor tree growth, extensive dieback, and frequent pest and disease outbreaks, which can significantly impact ecological functions and economic losses (Liu et al 2020). Therefore, high-quality poplar plantation forests are critical for the future of forestry production, and high-quality seedlings are critical to the success of afforestation projects (Yin et al 2015). One of the best methods to improve seedling and soil quality of afforestation sites is by introducing beneficial microorganisms such as ectomycorrhizal fungi (ECMF) into the rhizosphere, thus promoting seedling growth, increasing their resistance, and preventing disease (Podila et al 2009; Richardson et al 2009; Scheublin et al 2010; Chen et al 2019; de Vries et al 2020).

Poplar plants are colonized ectomycorrhizal fungi, primarily species belonging to Basidiomycotina, but also to Ascomycotina (Tang et al 2008). ECMF form a mutualistic symbiosis with roots (Genre et al 2020) and absorb inorganic nutrients such as nitrogen and phosphorus from the surrounding soil and deliver them to host plants via extraradical mycelia (Smith et al 2009; Das et al 2022). This dense mycelial network also increases the absorption area of the host plant root system and its ability to absorb water and various mineral nutrients (Liu 2021), thereby promoting plant growth and physiological and biochemical processes (Song et al 2007; Rooney et al 2009; Gong et al 2013; Yang et al 2014; Zhang et al 2020; Wang et al 2021a). Such mycorrhizal partnerships are common in poplars (Wang et al 2021b), and ECMF colonization can benefit poplar seedlings, laying the groundwork for good growth later in the season (Quoreshi and Khasa 2008). Thus, the introduction of seedlings with established mycorrhiza during afforestation could significantly improve their survival and quality.

In previous studies of Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica, S. luteus, introduced as a suspension into the soil of potted seedlings, established an ectomycorrhizal symbiosis with the seedlings and significantly enhanced their growth (Yin et al 2014; Wang et al 2021c) and improved their resistance to drought and tolerance to salt and alkalinity (Yin et al 2018, 2020). This growth promotion is significantly higher when external nutrients and probiotics are applied (Yin et al 2021). However, the impact of ectomycorrhizal fungi on the roots and the underlying mechanisms for the growth promotion are unknown.

To promote seedling establishment and survival of Populus davidiana × P. bolleana seedlings, two ectomycorrhizal fungi, S. luteus and P. involutus, were added to soils. We expected that seedling height, ground diameter, and root growth would be greater than for seedlings without the fungi. We also expected that physicochemical properties would be enhanced in the seedlings, yielding high-quality mycorrhizal seedlings that are more resilient to adverse conditions during afforestation. This work should also provide a reliable theoretical basis for developing the best protocol for growing the highest quality poplar seedlings for afforestation programs.

Materials and methods

Plant and fungal sources, site conditions

Populus davidiana × P. bolleana seedlings (1 year old) were generated by tissue culture. Suillus luteus and Paxillus involutus were isolated from a forest at the Zhanggutai Experimental Forest Farm, Changwu County, Liaoning Province. The region has a temperate continental monsoon climate, with an average annual growth period of 140 days and an average annual frost-free period of 155 days, with a maximum of 158 days and a minimum of 150 days, and mean annual sunshine of 3000 h and mean annual precipitation of 450 mm.

Material preparation

For growing seedlings, grass charcoal soil and vermiculite were mixed at a 2:1 ratio and sterilized in bags for 2 h at 120 °C in an autoclave, then placed in pots (diameter: 20 cm, height: 14 cm) and set aside.

For inoculum, Suillus luteus and Paxillus involutus were grown on potato dextrose (PDA) agar (20 g glucose, 200 g potato, 20 g agar, 3 g KH2PO4, 1.5 g MgSO4, 1.5 g peptone, and 1000 mL distilled water) approximately 1 month before seedling transplantation (Yin et al 2020).

Just before the cultures were used as inoculum, three 1-cm-diameter mycelial blocks from one of the fungal cultures on PDA were placed in 500 mL conical flask containing 200 mL of PD broth (PDB) and incubated on a shaker (25 °C, 170 rpm) for 24 h, then homogenized in a disintegrator and mixed 1:3 with water for use (Yin et al 2021).

Experimental design

The seedlings were inoculated using the perforated root irrigation method. Holes were made in the rhizosphere soil, then 100 mL of either a fungal solution (either Suillus luteus [Sl, Treatment 1]) or Paxillus involutus [Pi, Treatment 2]) or sterilized broth (Treatment 3: control check [CK]) was poured into the holes. Each treatment was replicated five times, and each pot was inoculated with 100 mL of fungal suspension and 15 seedlings. The seedlings were then grown for 2 months.

Measurement of relevant indicators

Mycorrhizal colonization rate

After 2 months of growth, three random seedlings from each treatment were removed from the pots to examine their mycorrhizal morphology using a stereoscope. A statistical sampling method was used to count the number of colonized root segments and calculate the rate of colonization as Mycorrhizal colonization rate (%) = (Number of root segments colonized by mycorrhizae/Total number of root segments) × 100.

Growth variables

Three other seedlings from each treatment were randomly removed from the soil, and the roots of cleaned of any attached soil using running tap water. Seedling height and ground diameter were measured using a tape measure and a Vernier caliper, respectively. Three leaves were chosen at random from the base up to the 10th leaf for each seedling, and the leaf area was calculated using the square grid method (Gao 2006). On standard calculation paper (minimum square size: 1 mm × 1 mm), the leaf contour was traced, and the squares within the leaf contour were counted (Squares that reached or exceeded the half lattice were counted as 1, and those that were less than half lattice were not counted.). The area of the three detached leaves from each seedling was measured using the square grid method and the average calculated. Each seedling was separated into shoots and roots, which were weighed with an electronic balance to determine the above- and belowground fresh mass and weighed again after they were dried to a constant mass at 80 °C to determine the dry mass.

Quantification of chlorophyll content

Total chlorophylls were extracted from 0.5 g of leaves using the method of Gao (2006) by grinding them with a mortar and pestle in 0.5 mL of acetone with a small amount of CaCO3 and quartz sand until homogeneous. The mixture and 10 mL of 80% acetone to rinse out the mortar was filtered through Whatman no. 1 filter paper. The filtrate was poured into a 25 mL volumetric flask and the volume to the scale line with 80% acetone. Absorption of each filtrate for each treatment was measured at 470 nm, 645 nm, and 663 nm using a NanoDrop Spectrophotomter (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with 80% acetone as a blank. Three replicates were analyzed for each treatment.

Soluble proteins

The method of Gao (2006) was used. Three leaves from different seedlings (0.2 g) were ground in distilled water with a bit of quartz sand using a mortar and pestle, then transferred to a 10-mL volumetric bottle with 2–3 rinses of the mortar and pestle with distilled water, and volume brought to scale with distilled water. After 2–3 mL of the homogenate was centrifuged at 5000 × g for 10 min, 0.1 mL of the supernatant containing the soluble proteins was mixed with 0.9 mL of distilled water and 5 mL of Coomassie bright blue G250. After 2 min, absorbance of the solution at 595 nm was measured using the NanoDrop Spectrophotometer, and total proteins determined using an albumin standard curve (10 mL).

Soluble sugars and cellulose

The method of Gao (2006) based on anthrone was used to measure soluble sugars. The stem from one seedling was crushed, filtered through a 100 mesh screen, then dried to a constant mass at 80 °C, then 0.1 g was placed in a large test tube with 10 mL of distilled water. The mixture was heated for 20 min in a boiling water bath, cooled, and filtered through a Whatman no. 1 filter into a 100-mL volumetric bottle. The residue on the filter was rinsed several times with a constant volume of distilled water, then the sample solution was mixed well, and 1.0 mL was combined with 5 mL of anthrone and boiled for 10 min and allowed to cool. Absorbance was measured at 620 nm using the NanoDrop Spectrophotometer. Soluble sugars were quantified using a standard curve generated using soluble sugars.

For cellulose content, the method of Niu (1992) using anthrone was used. The dried stem of a seedling was ground to a powder as described for soluble sugars and 0.1 g was filtered through 100-mesh screen, then mixed with 60 mL of 60% concentrated sulfuric acid and held for 30 min in an ice bath. The digested cellulose mixture was transferred to a 100-mL volumetric flask to be scaled with 60% v/v sulfuric acid. The solution was mixed, filtered through a Buchner funnel, and 5 mL of the sample was added to a 100-mL volumetric flask in an ice water bath and the volume brought to the 100-mL mark with distilled water; 2 mL of this solution was added to a test tube with 0.5 mL of 2% anthrone reagent and 5 mL of concentrated sulfuric acid, the tube was capped and the solution mixed thoroughly and placed on ice for approximately 12 min. Absorbance of the sample was measured at 620 nm. Cellulose content was quantified using a standard curve generated using cellulose.

Root variables

A scanner was used to scan and grade the root system of each plant. The scanned images were analyzed for root parameters, which included the length, surface area, projected area, volume, mean diameter, and number of root tips, using the image analysis system Win/Mac RHIZO (Regent Instruments, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada).

Data analyses

The collected data were entered into Excel 2018 (Microsoft, Redmond, WA, USA). Means of measured variables were compared for significant differences (α = 0.05) among treatments using a one-way analysis of variance using SPSS 26.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Data were plotted using Prism 8.0 (GraphPad, Boston, MA, USA).

Results

Mycorrhizal colonization rate and morphological observation

After 2 months, both fungal species formed ectomycorrhizal roots on Populus davidiana × P. bolleana, at a colonization rate of 64.83% for P. involutus and 68.08% for S. luteus (Fig. 1a). Light microscopy revealed that P. involutus had a darker color, a rod-like and bifurcated shape, and the root tips lacked root hairs. On the other hand, the mycorrhizal roots formed by S. luteus were rod-shaped, whereas the front end of the root system that formed mycorrhizal roots was shorter and thicker, with an enlarged shape (Figs. 1b, c). The root system of the control group was smooth and slender due to the absence of mycorrhiza formation (Fig. 1d).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Mycorrhizal colonization rate on Populus davidiana × P. bolleana after 2 months of growth in soil inoculated with Suillus luteus (Sl) or Paxillus involutus (Pi) and light micrographs of mycorrhizal morphology. a Mean (± SD) colonization rates. The same letters indicate means did not differ significantly (ANOVA, P < 0.05). b, c Mycorrhizal morphology of (b) P. involutus and (c) S. luteus. d Root morphology of control in soil without any fungi. Scale bars = 2 mm

Effect of ECMF on seedling growth

The seedlings inoculated with either of the fungal species grew more vigorously than the uninoculated controls, with significantly greater increases in seedling height, ground diameter, and biomass (Figs. 2, 3) and S. luteus-inoculated seedling performing significantly better than those inoculated with P. involutus (P < 0.05). After 2 months, seedling height was 17.70% greater (Fig. 2a) and ground diameter 10.21% greater (Fig. 2b) after inoculation with S. luteus compared with seedlings inoculated with P. involutus. Compared with fresh mass of controls, fresh mass of seedlings inoculated with S. luteus was 12.66% greater and 37.5% greater for those with P. involutus (Fig. 2c), whereas dry mass was 27.22% and 55.26% greater, respectively (Fig. 2d).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Growth traits of Populus davidiana × P. bolleana seedlings after 2 months of growth in uninoculated soil (CK) or soil inoculated with either Paxillus involutus (Pi) or Suillus luteus (Sl). Mean ± SD a height; b ground diameter; above- and belowground c fresh and d dry mass. Significant differences between means in (a) and (b) are indicated by different lowercase letters and by different capital letters for aboveground mass and different lowercase letters for above ground mass in (c) and (d) (ANOVA, P < 0.05)

Fig. 3
figure 3

Populus davidiana × P. bolleana seedlings after 2 months of growth in soil inoculated with either Suillus luteus (Sl), Paxillus involutus (Pi), or in uninoculated soil (CK)

Leaf area of the seedlings in both inoculation treatments was significantly greater than that of the control group (Fig. 4; P < 0.05) and compared with the controls, was 60.95% and 82.46% greater after inoculation with P. involutus and S. luteus, respectively (Fig. 4a). Leaf area after colonization with S. luteus was 13.37% greater than after colonization with P. involutus (Fig. 4a).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Leaf area of Populus davidiana × P. bolleana seedlings after 2 months of growth in uninoculated soil (CK) or soil inoculated with either Paxillus involutus (Pi) or Suillus luteus (Sl). a Mean (± SD) leaf area determined using the square grid method. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between means (ANOVA, N = 3 leaves per plant per treatment, P < 0.05). b Leaf traces on grip paper to determine leaf areas

Effect of ECMF on chlorophylls and carotenoids in seedlings

After 2 months, the two fungal species significantly increased the contents of chlorophyll a and b and carotenoids in the leaves compared with the controls (Fig. 5, ANOVA, P < 0.05). Only the chlorophyll a differed significantly between the seedlings inoculated with the different fungal species (P < 0.05; 3.52%, 1.74%, and 0.95% higher, respectively, with S. luteus than with P. involutus). Compared to levels in the control treatment, chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b, and carotenoids in seedlings with S. luteus was 25.81%, and 30.86% higher, respectively, and 8.40%, 23.66%, and 29.63% higher, respectively, in those with P. involutus.

Fig. 5
figure 5

Effect of ECMF on physiological indicators in Populus davidiana × P. bolleana seedlings after 2 months of growth in uninoculated soil (CK) or soil inoculated with either Paxillus involutus (Pi) or Suillus luteus (Sl). Mean (± SD) content of a chlorophyll a, b chlorophyll b, c carotenoids, d soluble proteins, e soluble sugars, f cellulose. Different lowercase letters indicate a significant difference between means (ANOVA, P < 0.05)

Effects of ECMF on soluble proteins, soluble sugars, and cellulose in seedlings

In contrast to levels in the control treatment after 2 months, soluble proteins, soluble sugars, and cellulose content were significantly higher in the inoculated seedlings (respectively: with S. luteus, 43.96%, 56.47%, and 10.44% higher; with P. involutus, 20.73%, 13.14%, and 8.14%). Comparing levels of inoculation with the two fungal species, the soluble proteins and soluble sugars were significantly higher with S. luteus; cellulose did not differ (respectively, 19.23%, 38.29%, and 2.13% higher with S. luteus).

Effect of ECMF on root variables of seedlings

Inoculation with either fungus significantly increased all root variables compared with the controls after 2 months (Fig. 6; ANOVA, P < 0.05). All root variables, except diameter, were significantly better in seedlings inoculated with S. luteus than with P. involutus. In comparison to the variables in the control, the root lengths with S. luteus and P. involutus were 122.79% and 67.64% longer, respectively (Fig. 6a), root surface area was 165.99 and 103.94% greater (Fig. 6b), root projected area was 157.70% and 100.12% greater (Fig. 6c), mean diameter of the roots was 16.40% and 15.31% larger (Fig. 6d), and root volume was 227.00% and 131.64% greater (Fig. 6e), and the number of root tips was 105.67% and 77.76% greater (Fig. 6f). Compared with the effects with P. involutus, S. luteus increased root length 32.90% more (Fig. 6a), root surface area 30.42% more (Fig. 6b), projected root area 28.75% more (Fig. 6c), root diameter only 0.39% more (Fig. 6d), root volume 41.16% more (Fig. 6e), number of root tips 15.70% more (Fig. 6f).

Fig. 6
figure 6

Effect of ECMF on the root parameters of Populus davidiana × P. bolleana after 2 months of growth in uninoculated soil (CK) or soil inoculated with either Paxillus involutus (Pi) or Suillus luteus (Sl). Mean (± SD) root a length, b surface area, c projected area, d diameter, e volume, and f number of root tips. Different lowercase letters indicate significant differences between means (ANOVA, P < 0.05)

Thus, compared to control seedlings, seedlings inoculated with S. luteus or P. involutus had more root tissue and better root systems in terms of area, number of bifurcations, diameter, and length. S. luteus and P. involutus both promoted seedling root growth, but S. luteus had a more pronounced effect (Fig. 7).

Fig. 7
figure 7

Scans of root system of Populus davidiana × P. bolleana seedlings after 2 months of growth in uninoculated soil (CK) or soil inoculated with either Paxillus involutus (Pi) or Suillus luteus (Sl)

Discussion

In the present study of Populus davidiana × P. bolleana seedlings, inoculation with Suillus luteus or with Paxillus involutus significantly increased all growth variables for the shoots and roots and physiological variables that were assessed. Similarly in Prunus cerasifera seedlings (Berta et al 1995) and Elaeagnus angustifolia seedlings (Xu et al 2021), ECMF inoculation significantly increases leaf area compared with that of uninoculated seedlings.

Because chlorophylls are the major light-capturing pigment, chlorophyll content is an important indicator of photosynthetic efficiency (Zheng et al 2008). ECMF are known to increase chlorophyll content in host plants (Moran et al 1994; Mathur and Vyas 2000; Sheng et al 2008; Evelin et al 2009; Zai et al 2012; Gong et al 2013), so not surprisingly, we found that significantly higher chlorophyll levels in the ECMF-treated seedlings than in the uninoculated control, likely improving photosynthetic capacity, as do the larger leaves blades as shown for ectomycorrhizal Zea mays.

Like our present study, several studies have shown that inoculating host plants with mycorrhizal fungi significantly increases soluble sugar and soluble protein contents (Feng et al 2002; Sheng et al 2011). A proteomic analysis showed that protein and carbohydrate synthesis and photosynthesis increase in Populus canescens seedlings after inoculation with ECMF (Szuba et al 2020). Thus, ectomycorrhizal fungi clearly promote protein and carbohydrate accumulation, which is strongly reliant on photosynthesis (Aasamaa et al 2010). An increase in the soluble protein content of leaves can also indirectly increase the activity of key photosynthesis-related enzymes. Moreover, higher soluble sugar levels can increase the photosynthetic capacity, leading to an increase in dry matter (Xu et al 2021).

Larger root systems, as found for the inoculated seedlings in our present study, can take up more water and nutrients from the soil, which are needed for increases in biomass (Chen et al 2019). The larger root systems with larger root diameters and more numerous root tips of the inoculated seedlings indicate greater capacity for absorption (Zhai et al 2015; Qi et al 2019; Wang et al 2021a).

Inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi can improve host plant resistance to adverse environmental conditions (Diagne et al 2020). For example, mycorrhizae improve plant drought tolerance by increasing photosynthetic, osmoregulatory, and antioxidant capacity (Lehto and Zwiazek 2011; Karti et al 2012; Liu et al 2015) and salinity resistance by reducing nutrient deficits, maintaining the ion balance, and mitigating ion damage to plasma membranes and enzymes (Kumar et al 2015). Mycorrhizae can also prevent heavy metals from entering the plant root system and secreting chelates to precipitate them (Ashford et al 1988; Dighton and White 2017) and preventing pathogen invasion and inhibit pathogen growth (Tang et al 2008; Blom et al 2009). Therefore, ectomycorrhizal inoculation can promote seedling growth and improve seedling resistance to adverse environmental conditions, thereby improving seedling quality in all aspects.

The mechanisms by which ectomycorrhizal fungi promote the growth of poplar plants have not yet been studied. Although we did not design experiments to study the mechanisms, our results showing that photosynthetic pigments levels were significantly higher in P. davidiana × P. bolleana after inoculation with ectomycorrhizal fungi, indicate that an early increase in photosynthetic capacity, a prerequisite for rapid growth and a potential mechanism for the growth promotion in Populus davidiana × P. bolleana. Of course, the increase in the absorptive area of plant roots will promote the absorption of nutrients and waters that are required for plant growth. However, the specific mechanisms that cause these increases requires further research.

The colonization of Populus davidiana × P. bolleana seedlings, by the introduced ectomycorrhizal fungi Suillus luteus and Paxillus involutus enhanced the photosynthetic capacity, soluble proteins and sugars and cellulose content of the seedlings, which grew larger stems, leaves and root systems (Fig. 8). The larger roots also improve the absorptive capacity for water and essential nutrients for improved growth. We speculate that these seedlings can also generate a significant amount of antioxidant enzymes, which can enhance their tolerance to stresses (Ma et al 2024). The rise in the levels of intracellular osmoregulatory substances such as sugars can also help maintain turgor pressure and increase tolerance to unfavorable conditions.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Schematic model showing factors promoted by ECMF colonization of Populus davidiana × P. bolleana seedlings

Toward improving the vigor and survival of afforested plants in ecologically fragile areas of Northeast China, future research should focus on understanding the mechanisms by which ectomycorrhizal fungi enhance the growth of Populus davidiana × P. bolleana trees and develop the best methods for improving tolerance to stresses such as drought and salinity and resistance to disease. Additionally, because S. luteus was isolated from Liaoning Province, it should be particularly suitable for high-quality reforestation plantations in Northeast China.

Conclusion

Suillus luteus and Paxillus involutus colonized the roots of Populus davidiana × P. bolleana and significantly increased root length, surface area, projected area, mean diameter, volume, and root tip number in comparison to the uninoculated controls. Seedling height, ground diameter, biomass, leaf area and chlorophylls and carotenoids, cellulose, and soluble sugars and proteins also significantly increased. S. luteus was more effective than P. involutus.