Abstract
Ammonium (NH4+) in biogas slurries is readily nitrified into very mobile soil nitrate (NO3−) to promote nitrogen (N) leaching concerning which a few studies, however, have been reported. These slurries are regularly applied through irrigation to purple soil in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, and therefore we explored the consequent N leaching there with a plot experiment. Biogas slurry irrigation was carried out with nitrogen application rates of 0, 48, 144, 240, 336, and 480 kg N/ha. As a result, the last two rates have triggered N leaching being detrimental to groundwater safety. In addition, N leaching was negatively correlated with soil microbial biomass, diversity, and respiration, indicating a potential technique to prevent it with soil heterotrophs activated by increased ratios of carbon to nitrogen (C/N) in biogas slurries.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Biogas slurries, a by-product of biogas projects, contain nutrients and thus are recycled as fertilizers to increase crop yields. However, significant gaps persist in our knowledge on their environmental impacts. To bridge these gaps, the scientific community has been making efforts, but to date researches are far from complete (Insam et al. 2015; Möller and Müller 2012; Nkoa 2014). A few studies have dealt with the nitrogen (N) leaching in soils following application of biogas slurries, although it may pose risks to groundwater. It mainly derives from very mobile nitrate (NO3−), into which the ammonium (NH4+) in biogas slurries, accounting for a large percentage (35 to 81%) of total nitrogen (Möller and Müller 2012; Nkoa 2014), is readily nitrified (Abubaker et al. 2013; Abubaker et al. 2012; Alburquerque et al. 2012; Goberna et al. 2011; Gomez-Brandon et al. 2016; Grigatti et al. 2011; Johansen et al. 2013; Sanger et al. 2014; Sawada and Toyota 2015; Senbayram et al. 2009).
Academic works have measured higher and lower rates of N leaching in the absence and presence of plants, respectively. After entering some bared soils, the biogas slurries resulted in three times as much NO3− leaching as the manure led to (Goberna et al. 2011), and in the N leaching accounting for 31% (Cheng et al. 2017) or 16% (Sänger et al. 2011) of the applied rate of nitrogen. However, if the maize or grasses were included, such ratios would be lower at 6 to 12% (Matsunaka et al. 2006), 8% (Svoboda et al. 2013a, b), or 1% (Svoboda et al. 2013a).
The two levels of N leaching may confuse questions as to which of them to refer to and then whether the other carries weight despite in fact the vital information provided by both. The less alarming level seems to outweigh because the usage of plants makes conditions more real. However, the other is also essential for our understanding of the processes that biogas slurry NH4+ go through, including volatilization, adsorption, immobilization, nitrogen uptake, and nitrification (Amlinger et al. 2003). In addition, it enables a simpler fate of NH4+ for exploration that getting rid of crops to separate the nitrogen uptake from other processes. Moreover, the clearer fate better fits experiments on the N leaching derived from biogas slurries per se, and on potential (the maximum likelihood) and risk of N leaching (USEPA 1998).
Here, we investigate the N leaching in purple soil following biogas slurry irrigation of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area. This area is critical for the water quality of the Yangtze River, the world’s third longest river, because it covers a 660-km stretch (Gao 2017; Gleick 2009). It however is vulnerable to N leaching, because the purple soil accounts for 69% of arable lands (Guan et al. 2014), and is characterized by shallow depths of up to 50 cm. According to reports, recent years have witnessed increasing environmental concerns raised by agricultural nitrogen loads there (Gao 2017; Ma et al. 2016; Zhang et al. 2015).
Biogas slurry irrigation was carried out with nitrogen application rates of 0 to 480 kg N/ha to analyze the consequent leachate and soil for experimental results, which may lead to sensible precautions against unawareness undermining the safety of the environment.
Material and methods
Soil and biogas slurry
Both purple soil and biogas slurry were similar to those in a study, with respect to the sources and characteristics (Table 1) (Cheng et al. 2017). The silty clay loam was collected at the National Monitoring Station of Purple Soil Fertility and Fertilizer Efficiency, Chongqing, China (106° 25′ 45 ″ N, 29° 49′ 18″ E), being located in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area. The slurry was collected from a cattle farm in Banan, Chongqing, China. After sedimentation, slurry in the upper layer was passed through a 1-mm sieve and diluted with tap water.
Experimental plot setup
Smaller plots (SPs) measuring 24 cm long × 18 cm wide × 20 cm deep and larger plots (LPs) measuring 60 cm long × 40 cm wide × 60 cm deep were employed (Fig. 1). In order to achieve a density of 1.25 g/cm3 in all plots, they were homogeneously packed with the air-dried aggregates of diameter less than 5 mm rather than intact soil. They were run outside but shielded from rains and kept bare during this experiment.
Experimental design
Biogas slurry irrigation with a rate of 25 mm/week lasted for 12 weeks, equivalent to 0 (tap water), 144, and 336 kg N/ha for the SPs (r0 to r336) and 0, 48, 144, 240, 336, and 480 kg N/ha for the LPs (R0 to R480). Both the irrigation rate (Fessehazion 2012) and the nitrogen application rates (Amon et al. 2006; Bertora et al. 2008; de la Fuente et al. 2012; Gericke et al. 2012; Köster et al. 2011; Monaco et al. 2011; Quakernack et al. 2012; Svoboda et al. 2013a, b; Win et al. 2014; Wu et al. 2013) are commonly used. SPs had two replicates while the repetition of LPs was impossible to perform due to high consumption of air-dried soil (2.2 to 3.2 tons). This is consistent with some studies suffering from shortages of materials (e.g., soil, wastewater) (Castillo et al. 2001; Hedström and Amofah 2008; Jellali et al. 2010).
Sampling and analysis
Leachate was collected under plots by containers to determine pH (PB-10; Sartorius, Göttingen, Germany), total nitrogen (TN) (MEPC 1990), ammonium nitrogen (NH4+-N) (MEPC 2009), nitrite nitrogen (NO2−-N) (MEPC 1987), nitrate nitrogen (NO3−-N) (CNEMC 2007), and chemical oxygen demand (COD) (COD DRB 200 and COD DR1010; Hach, Loveland, USA). Each parameter was determined by triplicate measurements. Sampling took place on the first day and the last day each week after each irrigation. The first days could represent their weeks as regards the quality of leachate, since they contributed about 100% and 69% to the weekly volumes for LPs and SPs, respectively.
Each layer of soil (0 to 20 cm; 20 to 40 cm; and 40 to 60 cm) was analyzed once a month for pH-water (1:5) (Pansu and Gautheyrou 2003), total organic carbon (TOC) (Cao et al. 1983), total nitrogen (TN) (Xu 1992), ammonium nitrogen (NH4+-N) (MEPC 2012), nitrate nitrogen (NO3−-N) (MEPC 2012), and soil microbial biomass nitrogen (SMBN) (Cabrera and Beare 1993). Phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) in the surface soil (0 to 20 cm) sampled from LPs at the end of experiment was determined (Wang et al. 2016). The measurement of any soil indicator was performed in triplicate or quadruplicate.
Statistical analysis
The C respired, N nitrified, TN leached, NO3−-N leached, and N denitrified were calculated to indicate soil respiration, nitrification, N leaching, NO3− leaching, and denitrification, respectively (Cheng et al. 2017). Then, ordination analysis (Canoco CCA) was applied, across the gradient of nitrogen application rates, to nitrogen leaching-related indices (e.g., N nitrified, TN leached, and NO3−-N leached), soil microbial indices (e.g., SMBN, PLFA, and C respired), and experimental treatments (as r0 to r336 and R0 to R480) (Palmer 2015). One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by post hoc test was used to determine differences between treatments.
Results and discussion
N leaching raised environmental concern
None of total nitrogen loads, leachate nitrogen concentrations (as TN and NO3−-N), temporal trends in the concentrations, and soil temperature conditions were suggestive of low risks of N leaching, when the nitrogen application rates of 336 and 480 kg N/ha had been employed (as r336, R336, and R480).
N leaching was relatively undesirable, given total nitrogen loads accounting for 13 ± 3% and 20 ± 11% of the nitrogen applied to SPs and LPs, respectively. These proportions, along with 16 to 30% for the bare soils (Cheng et al. 2017; Sänger et al. 2011), varied in excess of 1 to 12% for the soils with herbs (Matsunaka et al. 2006; Svoboda et al. 2013a, b). This is because immediate infiltration of irrigation water left little time for denitrification of soil NO3− and no chance of NO3− uptake was provided in this study. However, if restored, the nitrogen uptake might blind one to the environmental impacts and risks of biogas slurries per se.
N leaching raised environmental concerns as the nitrogen application rate achieved 336 kg N/ha (r336, R336, and R480). Meanwhile, the leachate TN became significantly higher than the counterparts in the other treatments (Sig.< 0.05, Fig. 2(a and b)), together with the leachate NO3−-N of 23.07 ± 18.12 mg/L and 45.47 ± 22.08 mg/L for SPs and LPs, respectively (Fig. 2(e and f)). The NO3−-N concentrations were far short of the reported around 100 mg/L (Goberna et al. 2011). However, substantial proportions of them were beyond the local threshold for groundwater (30 mg/L) (MEPC 1994), 30% and 73% for SPs and LPs, respectively; and the nitrate can have an easy access to groundwater due to the limited depths of purple soil. In addition, N leaching (leachate TN and NO3−-N) was positively correlated to nitrogen application rates (N applied) and in close proximity to the higher ones (r336, R336, and R480) as demonstrated in ordination analysis (Fig. 4). In fact, nitrogen application rates of over 336 kg N/ha are highly likely to occur in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area employing an average rate of 287 kg N/ha, and particularly in the upstream regions where flooded arable lands (or paddy fields) receiving little biogas slurry take, however, larger proportions than their counterparts in the downstream regions; accordingly, groundwater quality in the upstream area is worth investigating in further studies. The average rate was estimated according to that 20% of about 350,000 t of the manure TN load produced by livestock and poultry is processed in anaerobic digesters and then applied to a total area of 243,940 ha of available and arable lands (Chen et al. 2008; Huang et al. 1999, 2017; Wei et al. 2013; Yang et al. 2012).
N leaching increased over time once the higher rates of nitrogen were applied (r336, R336, and R480), as indicated by very high correlations between leachate TN and time (R2 > 0.91, Fig. 2(a and b)). Leachate TN increased by 4.07, 2.57, and 7.97 mg/(L × week) for r336, R336, and R480, respectively. Such high correlations were interesting but seldom reported.
The N leaching could be even greater due to increased soil temperatures and intensified application of biogas slurries. Soil temperatures were recorded three times per day as 9.8 ± 2.6 °C and 10.0 ± 2.8 °C for SPs and LPs, respectively. They were much colder than 25 to 35 °C, the optimum range for nitrification promoting N leaching (Harmsen and Kolenbrander 1965). Therefore, the observed N leaching was conservative compared with its potential. In addition, it could be enhanced during autumn plowing in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area, provided that this monsoon season has witnessed air temperatures averaging out to 32 °C (TQW 2018) and a vast majority of annual output of biogas slurries being applied.
N leaching was due to soil nitrification
The escalated N leaching accompanied by the higher nitrogen application rates was because of the high potential of digestate NH4+ to be nitrified into the very mobile NO3− in soils (Abubaker et al. 2012, 2013; Alburquerque et al. 2012; Goberna et al. 2011; Gomez-Brandon et al. 2016; Grigatti et al. 2011; Johansen et al. 2013; Sanger et al. 2014; Sawada and Toyota 2015; Senbayram et al. 2009).
It indicated soil nitrification that the predominant nitrogen changed from NH4+ in biogas slurry into NO3− in leachate. The principal form was NH4+ accounting for 80 ± 13% of TN in the biogas slurries, which fell into 35 to 81% in the reviews (Möller and Müller 2012; Nkoa 2014). But after irrigation, it was transformed into NO3− in the leachate with ratios of NO3−-N to TN being 56 ± 23% and 90 ± 20% for SPs and LPs (Fig. 2(a–f)), respectively, in line with several studies (Matsunaka et al. 2006; Sänger et al. 2011; Svoboda et al. 2013a, b). Some percentages exceeded 100% due to the incomplete recovery of the method for determining TN (Cabrera and Beare 1993; Hagedorn and Schleppi 2000).
Another evidence of the nitrification was accumulations of NO3− in soil. Decreases in soil NO3− continued through the experiment when nitrogen was applied at the rates below 240 kg N/ha. However, as soon as that rate was achieved, they turned into increases accounting for 16% and 22% of the nitrogen inputs to SPs and LPs, respectively (Fig. 4(c and i)).
N leaching would be deterred by enlarged ratio of C/N in biogas slurry
Inactivated heterotrophs were responsible for the soil nitrification and consequent N leaching; therefore, activating them through enlarging the ratios of carbon to nitrogen (C/N) in biogas slurries may deter the N leaching.
Soil heterotrophs were influential in nitrogen dynamics of this study. They are able to break down organic matters to obtain carbon sources and release NH4+ during mineralization, thus influencing TOC in arable soils (Waksman and Starkey 1931). They were formidable compared with the carbon inputs through biogas slurries of this study, since interplot standard deviations of carbon applied to LPs accounted for only 4% of that of soil ∆TOC, consistent with a reported finding (Gomez-Brandon et al. 2016). Moreover, the increase of 26 kg N/ha in SMBN coincided with the TOC consumption of 12 t C/ha and the NH4+ accumulation of 16.5 kg N/ha in the treatment R0, although no biogas slurry was applied at all.
Soil heterotrophs were inactivated to free N leaching in treatments with the higher nitrogen application rates (r336, R336, and R480), as indicated by the microbial biomass (SMBN and PLFA contents), diversity (Shannon Index of PLFA), and respiration (C respired). These indicators each were negatively correlated to nitrogen application rates (Applied N) and distanced from the higher ones (r336, R336, and R480, Fig. 4), probably due to negative effects on heterotrophs of both a lack of carbon sources and an oversupply of biogas slurry NH4+ (Jansson et al. 1955; Kangmeznarich and Broderick 1980; Recous et al. 1990; Ricke and Schaefer 1991). As a result, redundant biogas slurry NH4+ for the inactive heterotrophs had promoted autotrophic nitrifiers, nitrification, NO3− accumulation, and the consequent N leaching.
The soil heterotrophs would be reactivated to deter N leaching through increasing biogas slurry C/N, because carbon sources assist heterotrophs to compete with autotrophic nitrifiers for NH4+ (Kaye and Hart 1997) and to denitrify NO3− (Broadbent and Clark 1965). The soil respiration (C respired) was negatively correlated with the N leaching-related indices (as N nitrified, TN leached, and NO3−-N leached, Fig. 4). In addition, negative correlations also persisted between the ratios of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) to TN in biogas slurries and the soil NO3− of an incubation experiment (Alburquerque et al. 2012).
In fact, it has been proved effective in a further test to prevent the N leaching with enlarged biogas slurry C/N ratios (Cheng et al. 2017). However, further confirmations are still needed.
Uncertainties in results
Measures, concerning negative impacts of the repacked soil and the lack of repetition for LPs, were taken to alleviate or recognize uncertainties in the results.
Not until 4 months after packing the plots did the experiment begin. During that time, the plots were exposed to rains. Therefore, soil processes such as mineralization, nitrification, and denitrification could be restored prior to the experiment to avoid unfavorable effects of the air-dried soil on the results (e.g., the priming effect derived from saturation (Kuzyakov et al. 2000)).
Comparability between LPs was monitored during the 4 months, so as to reasonably cancel the usage of LPs once any significant deterioration of it had been detected. The comparability was reflected by interplot standard deviations (SDs) of leachate quality. The leachate was collected after four rains varying from 7 to 32 mm, and analyzed for pH, TN, NH4+-N, and NO3−-N, each of the four SDs averaged out to as low as 0.07, 1.91 mg/L, 0.07 mg/L, and 2.16 mg/L, respectively. As a result of the small SDs, LPs were considered suitable and subsequently put into operation.
SPs were regarded as a practical expedient for repeating LPs or, at least, a means to prove the reliability of the findings from LPs, due to two reasons. SPs were a scaled-down version of LPs. Besides, they repeated some nitrogen application rates of LPs. After experiment, the results from LPs were considered reliable. This is because they bear resemblance to those from SPs in respect of their temporal trends and the influences of nitrogen application rates on them (Figs. 2, 3, 4), and to their counterparts in two further studies including one published (Cheng et al. 2017) with reference to the significant N leaching and the preventive measure that they indicated.
Conclusions
Concern over N leaching in purple soil was raised by the biogas slurry irrigation employing nitrogen application rates of 336 and 480 kg N/ha; and one option is to increase biogas slurry C/N to prevent N leaching, but needs further confirmations.
Considerable percentages, 30 and 73% for SPs and LPs, respectively, of leachate samples were beyond the local threshold for NO3− in groundwater. Besides, the observed N leaching might be conservative compared with its potential, considering the soil temperatures remaining around 10 °C which was well below 25 to 35 °C, the optimum range for soil nitrification to produce very mobile NO3− and then facilitate N leaching. The upstream regions of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area are of interest to further studies investigating groundwater quality because possibly high nitrogen application rates occur there.
The N leaching-related indices (as N nitrified, TN leached, and NO3−-N leached) were negatively correlated with the soil microbial biomass (SMBN and PLFA contents), diversity (Shannon Index of PLFA), and respiration (C respired), probably due to the situations for NH4+ either feeding autotrophic nitrifiers or heterotrophs and for NO3− either being leached or feeding heterotrophic denitrifiers.
References
Abubaker J, Risberg K, Pell M (2012) Biogas residues as fertilisers—effects on wheat growth and soil microbial activities. Appl Energy 99:126–134
Abubaker J, Cederlund H, Arthurson V, Pell M (2013) Bacterial community structure and microbial activity in different soils amended with biogas residues and cattle slurry. Appl Soil Ecol 72:171–180
Alburquerque JA, de la Fuente C, Bernal MP (2012) Chemical properties of anaerobic digestates affecting C and N dynamics in amended soils. Agric Ecosyst Environ 160:15–22
Amlinger F, Gotz B, Dreher P, Geszti J, Weissteiner C (2003) Nitrogen in biowaste and yard waste compost: dynamics of mobilisation and availability—a review. Eur J Soil Biol 39:107–116
Amon B, Kryvoruchko V, Amon T, Zechmeister-Boltenstern S (2006) Methane, nitrous oxide and ammonia emissions during storage and after application of dairy cattle slurry and influence of slurry treatment. Agric Ecosyst Environ 112:153–162
Bertora C, Alluvione F, Zavattaro L, van Groenigen JW, Velthof G, Grignani C (2008) Pig slurry treatment modifies slurry composition, N2O, and CO2 emissions after soil incorporation. Soil Biol Biochem 40:1999–2006
Broadbent FE, Clark F (1965) Denitrification. In: Bartholomew WV, Clark FE (eds) Soil nitrogen. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 344–359
Cabrera ML, Beare MH (1993) Alkaline persulfate oxidation for determining Total nitrogen in microbial biomass extracts. Soil Sci Soc Am J 57:1007–1012
Cao H, Tang R, Zhu Q (1983) Normal methods of soil agro-chemical analysis. Beijing, Science Press (in Chinese)
Castillo G, Mena MP, Dibarrart F, Honeyman G (2001) Water quality improvement of treated wastewater by intermittent soil percolation. Water Sci Technol 43:187–190
Chen J, Pan J, Luo L (2008) Study on the pollution of livestock and poultry manure in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area of Chongqing. Agro-Environ Dev 2:100–118 (in Chinese)
Cheng J, Chen Y, He T, Liao R, Liu R, Yi M, Huang L, Yang Z, Fu T, Li X (2017) Soil nitrogen leaching decreases as biogas slurry DOC/N ratio increases. Appl Soil Ecol 111:105–113
China National Evironmental Monitoring Center (CNEMC) (2007) Water quality-determination of nitrate-nitrogen-ultraviolet spectrophotometry. China Environmental Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese)
de la Fuente C, Alburquerque JA, Clemente R, Bernal MP (2012) Soil C and N mineralisation and agricultural value of the products of an anaerobic digestion system. Biol Fertil Soils 49:313–322
Fessehazion MK (2012) Using adaptive management and modelling to improve nitrogen and water use efficiency in crop production : a case study using annual ryegrass, University of Pretoria
Gao S (2017) The Three Gorges Project: development and environmental issues (in Chinese)
Gericke D, Bornemann L, Kage H, Pacholski A (2012) Modelling ammonia losses after field application of biogas slurry in energy crop rotations. Water Air Soil Pollut 223:29–47
Gleick P (2009) Three Gorges Dam Project, Yangtze River, China
Goberna M, Podmirseg SM, Waldhuber S, Knapp BA, García C, Insam H (2011) Pathogenic bacteria and mineral N in soils following the land spreading of biogas digestates and fresh manure. Appl Soil Ecol 49:18–25
Gomez-Brandon M, Juarez MFD, Zangerle M, Insam H (2016) Effects of digestate on soil chemical and microbiological properties: a comparative study with compost and vermicompost. J Hazard Mater 302:267–274
Grigatti M, Di Girolamo G, Chincarini R, Ciavatta C, Barbanti L (2011) Potential nitrogen mineralization, plant utilization efficiency and soil CO2 emissions following the addition of anaerobic digested slurries. Biomass Bioenergy 35:4619–4629
Guan SF, Xia ZY, Zhang LL, Chen Y (2014) Research of compressibility of purple soil in the Three Gorges Reservoir. Adv Mater Res 1010-1012:622–625
Hagedorn F, Schleppi P (2000) Determination of total dissolved nitrogen by persulfate oxidation. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 163:81–82
Harmsen GW, Kolenbrander GJ (1965) Soil in organic nitrogen. In: Bartholomew WV, Clark FE (eds) Soil nitrogen, Madison, American Society of Agronomy, pp 43–92
Hedström A, Amofah LR (2008) Adsorption and desorption of ammonium by clinoptilolite adsorbent in municipal wastewater treatment systems. J Environ Eng Sci 7:53–61
Huang X, Ye W, Deng W, Cheng B (1999) The significance of and technical measures for a eco-friendly sericulture industry coordinating with the conservation of water and soil in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area. Hubei Agric Sci 9:38–40 (in Chinese)
Huang M, Xia Y, Fan X, Huang M, Wu M, Liu D, Zhang F (2017) Evaluation of livestock pollution status in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area of Hubei Province. Chin J Ecol 36:725–733 (in Chinese)
Insam H, Gomez-Brandon M, Ascher J (2015) Manure-based biogas fermentation residues—friend or foe of soil fertility? Soil Biol Biochem 84:1–14
Jansson SL, Hallam MJ, Bartholomew WV (1955) Preferential utilization of ammonium over nitrate by micro-organisms in the decomposition of oat straw. Plant Soil 6:382–390
Jellali S, Diamantopoulos E, Kallali H, Bennaceur S, Anane M, Jedidi N (2010) Dynamic sorption of ammonium by sandy soil in fixed bed columns: evaluation of equilibrium and non-equilibrium transport processes. J Environ Manag 91:897–905
Johansen A, Carter MS, Jensen ES, Hauggard-Nielsen H, Ambus P (2013) Effects of digestate from anaerobically digested cattle slurry and plant materials on soil microbial community and emission of CO2 and N2O. Appl Soil Ecol 63:36–44
Kangmeznarich JH, Broderick GA (1980) Effects of incremental urea supplementation on ruminal ammonia concentration and bacterial protein-formation. J Anim Sci 51:422–431
Kaye JP, Hart SC (1997) Competition for nitrogen between plants and soil microorganisms. Trends Ecol Evol 12:139–143
Köster JR, Cárdenas L, Senbayram M, Bol R, Well R, Butler M, Mühling KH, Dittert K (2011) Rapid shift from denitrification to nitrification in soil after biogas residue application as indicated by nitrous oxide isotopomers. Soil Biol Biochem 43:1671–1677
Kuzyakov Y, Friedel JK, Stahr K (2000) Review of mechanisms and quantification of priming effects. Soil Biol Biochem 32:1485–1498
Ma X, Li Y, Li B, Han W, Liu D, Liu X (2016) Evaluation of nitrogen and phosphorus loads from agricultural nonpoint source in relation to water quality in Three Gorges Reservoir Area, China. Desalin Water Treat 57:20985–21002
Matsunaka T, Sawamoto T, Ishimura H, Takakura K, Takekawa A (2006) Efficient use of digested cattle slurry from biogas plant with respect to nitrogen recycling in grassland. Int Congr Ser 1293:242–252 (in Chinese)
Ministry of Environment Protection of the People's Republic of China (MEPC) (1987) Water quality-determination of nitrogen (nitrite)—spectrophotometric method. China Environmental Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese)
Ministry of Environment Protection of the People's Republic of China (MEPC) (1990) Water quality-determination of total nitrogen-alkaline potassium persulfate digestion-UV spectrophotometric method. China Environmental Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese)
Ministry of Environment Protection of the People's Republic of China (MEPC) (1994) Quality standard for groundwater. China Environmental Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese)
Ministry of Environment Protection of the People's Republic of China (MEPC) (2009) Water quality-determination of ammonia nitrogen-Nessler’s reagent spectrophotometry. China Environmental Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese)
Ministry of Environment Protection of the People's Republic of China (MEPC) (2012) Soil determination of ammonium, nitrite and nitrate by extraction with potassium chloride solution-spectrophotometric methods. China Environmental Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese)
Möller K, Müller T (2012) Effects of anaerobic digestion on digestate nutrient availability and crop growth: a review. Eng Life Sci 12:242–257
Monaco S, Sacco D, Pelissetti S, Dinuccio E, Balsari P, Rostami M, Grignani C (2011) Laboratory assessment of ammonia emission after soil application of treated and untreated manures. J Agric Sci 150:65–73
Nkoa R (2014) Agricultural benefits and environmental risks of soil fertilization with anaerobic digestates: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 34:473–492
Palmer M (2015) Ordination methods for ecologists, http://ordination.okstate.edu (accessed February, 2018)
Pansu M, Gautheyrou J (2003) Handbook of soil analysis: mineralogical, organic and inorganic methods. Springer-Verlag, Berlin
Quakernack R, Pacholski A, Techow A, Herrmann A, Taube F, Kage H (2012) Ammonia volatilization and yield response of energy crops after fertilization with biogas residues in a coastal marsh of Northern Germany. Agric Ecosyst Environ 160:66–74
Recous S, Mary B, Faurie G (1990) Microbial immobilization of ammonium and nitrate in cultivated soils. Soil Biol Biochem 22:913–922
Ricke SC, Schaefer DM (1991) Growth-inhibition of the rumen bacterium Selenomonas-Ruminantium by ammonium-salts. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 36:394–399
Sänger A, Geisseler D, Ludwig B (2011) Effects of moisture and temperature on greenhouse gas emissions and C and N leaching losses in soil treated with biogas slurry. Biol Fertil Soils 47:249–259
Sanger A, Geisseler D, Ludwig B (2014) C and N dynamics of a range of biogas slurries as a function of application rate and soil texture: a laboratory experiment. Arch Agron Soil Sci 60:1779–1794
Sawada K, Toyota K (2015) Effects of the application of digestates from wet and dry anaerobic fermentation to Japanese paddy and Upland soils on short-term nitrification. Bull Jpn Soc Microbial Ecol 30:37–43
Senbayram M, Chen R, Muhling KH, Dittert K (2009) Contribution of nitrification and denitrification to nitrous oxide emissions from soils after application of biogas waste and other fertilizers. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 23:2489–2498
Svoboda N, Taube F, Kluß C, Wienforth B, Kage H, Ohl S, Hartung E, Herrmann A (2013a) Crop production for biogas and water protection—a trade-off? Agric Ecosyst Environ 177:36–47
Svoboda N, Taube F, Wienforth B, Kluß C, Kage H, Herrmann A (2013b) Nitrogen leaching losses after biogas residue application to maize. Soil Tillage Res 130:69–80
Tian Qi Wang (TQW) (2018) Chong Qing Qi Wen, http://www.tianqi.com (Accessed March 19th, 2018) (in Chinese)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (1998) Guidelines for ecological risk assessment, Risk assessment forum
Waksman SA, Starkey RL (1931) The soil and the microbe; an introduction to the study of the microscopic population of the soil and its role in soil processes and plant growth. John Wiley & Sons, New York xi, 260 p
Wang F, Yuan T, Gu S, Wang Z-Y (2016) Effects of organic and inorganic slow-release compound fertilizers on microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen, and microbial community structure in soil. Acta Ecol Sin 36:1–8 (in Chinese)
Wei X, Gao L, Xu J, Yao Z, Jing T (2013) Study on scale breeding distribution and waste treatment and utilization technology in Three Gorges Reservoir Area. Southwest China J Agric Sci 26:2030–2035 (in Chinese)
Win AT, Toyota K, Win KT, Motobayashi T, Ookawa T, Hirasawa T, Chen DJ, Lu J (2014) Effect of biogas slurry application on CH4 and N2O emissions, Cu and Zn uptakes by whole crop rice in a paddy field in Japan. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 60:411–422
Wu J, Yang Q, Yang G, Shen F, Zhang X-H, Zhang Y-Z (2013) Effects of biogas slurry on yield and quality of oil-seed rape. J Plant Nutr 36:2084–2098
Xu P (1992) Soil agro-chemical analysis. Agriculture Press, Beijing (in Chinese)
Yang Y, Zhang P, Li G (2012) Regional differentiation of biogas industrial development in China. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16:6686–6693
Zhang T, Ni J, Xie D (2015) Severe situation of rural nonpoint source pollution and efficient utilization of agricultural wastes in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 22:16453–16462
Funding
The authors received financial support from GZU (Guizhou University) Fund for Newly-enrolled Talent ([2016]01), GZSTA (Guizhou Science and Technology Agency) & GZU Joint Fund (LH[2017]7292), GZU Xinmiao Talent Program ([2017]5788), National Key Technology R&D Program in the 11th Five Year Plan of China (2010BAD03B03) and Guizhou Top Discipline Program (GNYL[2017]009).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Responsible editor: Zhihong Xu
Highlights
• Applying biogas slurry at common nitrogen application rates triggered N leaching.
• The N leaching was due to soil nitrification promoted by the biogas slurry.
• Increasing slurry C/N might prevent the N leaching but needs further confirmation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cheng, J., Chen, Y., He, T. et al. Nitrogen leaching losses following biogas slurry irrigation to purple soil of the Three Gorges Reservoir Area. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25, 29096–29103 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2875-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-2875-4