Abstract
We analyzed Cryptosporidium spp. in fecal samples of wild cervids (Ozotoceros bezoarticus, Blastocerus dichotomus, Mazama nana, Mazama americana, and Mazama bororo) from many Brazilian regions, a fact unprecedented in the literature. Sniffer dogs were used to collect 936 fecal samples of cervids from 14 Brazilian localities. Cervids species were identified using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) performed from genomic DNA extracted from 563 fecal samples of Ozotoceros bezoarticus, Blastocerus dichotomus, Mazama nana, Mazama americana, and Mazama bororo. Cryptosporidium spp. oocyst screening was performed using malachite green negative staining. Nested PCR (nPCR) protocols targeting the 18S rRNA and GP60 genes followed by genetic sequencing were performed for Cryptosporidium spp. detection and Cryptosporidium parvum subtyping, respectively. Nested PCR targeting actin gene and genetic sequencing were performed in samples with non-identified Cryptosporidium species by 18S rRNA amplicon sequencing. The association between the occurrence of Cryptosporidium and the presence of bovines in the same locality was evaluated using Fisher’s exact test. The positivity rates of diagnostic methods were compared by McNemar test and the Kappa correlation coefficient. The prevalence rates of Cryptosporidium spp. in cervids were 1.42% (8/563) and 0.36% (2/563) by nPCR and malachite green negative staining, respectively. C. parvum IIaA16G3R1 isolate was identified in three fecal samples from M. americana, two from M. nana and one from B. dichotomus. Cryptosporidium ryanae were found in one sample from B. dichotomus. We identified a new Cryptosporidium genotype, named Cryptosporidium deer genotype BR, from one M. americana fecal sample.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Parasites of Cryptosporidium genus are protozoans with a great capacity for dissemination through the environment. The transmission of these parasites occurs through the ingestion of water or food contaminated with sporulated oocysts, which are eliminated in the feces of infected hosts (Fayer et al. 2000). The genus Cryptosporidium is composed of approximately 42 species and more than 40 genotypes (Feng et al. 2018; Zahedi and Ryan 2020), identified in a variety of hosts, such as mammals, birds, reptiles, amphibians and fish (Rieux et al. 2013).
Currently, there are numerous reports of the occurrence of Cryptosporidium species and genotypes in deers from different regions of the world as following: Cryptosporidium bovis (García-Presedo et al. 2013), Cryptosporidium ryanae (García-Presedo et al. 2013; Koehler et al. 2016), Cryptosporidium andersoni (Huang et al. 2018), Cryptosporidium ubiquitum (Robinson et al. 2011; Feng et al. 2012; Koehler et al. 2016; Kotková et al. 2016; Huang et al. 2018,); Cryptosporidium deer genotype (Robinson et al. 2011; Santin and Fayer 2015; Wells et al. 2015; Kato et al. 2016; Kotková et al. 2016; Huang et al. 2018; Xie et al. 2019; Tao et al. 2020); Cryptosporidium parvum (Perz and Le Blancq 2001; Wells et al. 2015; Huang et al. 2018); Cryptosporidium muris (Kotková et al. 2016; Huang et al. 2018), Cryptosporidium hominis (Koehler et al. 2016), Cryptosporidium xiaoi (Zhao et al. 2020), Cryptosporidium Muskrat II genotype (Perz and Le Blancq 2001), C. hominis-like (Jellison et al. 2009) and Cryptosporidium suis-like (Koehler et al. 2016; Huang et al. 2018).
In Brazil, there are few studies related to the infection by Cryptosporidium spp. in cervids, mostly based on diagnosis using conventional microscopy techniques performed on feces of animals kept in captivity (Reginatto et al. 2010; Ludwig and Marques 2011). To date, only one study based on molecular diagnosis has been carried out on free-living cervids in Brazil. However, the aforementioned study evaluated the presence of oocysts in feces of only one species of deer (Mazama gouazoubira) (Teixeira et al. 2021).
Currently, there are eight species of native cervids (Odocoileus virginianus, Ozotoceros bezoarticus, Blastocerus dichotomus, Mazama nemorivaga, M. gouazoubira, Mazama nana, Mazama americana and Mazama bororo) distributed beyond the Brazilian territory (Duarte 1996; Duarte and Merino 1997; Duarte and Jorge 2003); most of them (with the exception to M. gouazoubira) are declining in number due to illegal hunting and infectious diseases (Machado et al. 2006; Szabó et al. 2009; Araújo et al. 2010; Piovezan et al. 2010). In this context, we investigated the prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. in fecal samples of Ozotoceros bezoarticus, Blastocerus dichotomus, Mazama nana, Mazama americana, and Mazama bororo, a fact unprecedented in the literature.
Material and methods
Fecal samples collection
A total of 936 fecal samples from wild cervids were collected in 14 Brazilian locations (Table 1) with the help of sniffer dogs (Duarte 2005).During sample collections, the presence of cattle (one or more animals) in the physical environments where deer fecal samples were collected was evaluated.
Each fecal sample was divided into two aliquots. One aliquot was stored at -20°C for DNA extraction to perform Cryptosporidium research using nested PCR (nPCR), and another one was stored in a tube containing 100% ethanol to perform oocyst screening using centrifugal sedimentation in water-ether followed by negative malachite green staining technique.
Genomic DNA extraction
Fecal samples stored at -20°C were submitted to genomic DNA extraction using the commercial kit QIAamp® DNA Stool Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), according to manufacturer's guidelines.
Cervids species identification
Identification of cervids species was carried out by PCR followed by hydrolysis with the restriction enzymes Sspl, AflIII and BstN (González et al. 2009; De Souza et al. 2013), in all samples of genomic DNA. After these analyses, as they were not part of the main objective of this study, 373 fecal samples of M. gouazoubira were identified and excluded. We selected 563 samples belonging to the Ozotoceros bezoarticus, Blastocerus dichotomus, Mazama nana, Mazama americana, and Mazama bororo (Table 1).
Fecal samples purification and microscopic examination
All samples stored in ethanol and selected during cervids species identification were purified by centrifugal sedimentation in water-ether (Meloni and Thompson 1996) and the resulting sediment was used for Cryptosporidium spp. oocyst screening by microscopy using malachite green negative staining technique (Elliot et al. 1999).
PCR amplification and molecular characterization
DNA samples of the selected cervids species were subjected to amplification of a fragment of the 18S rRNA subunit gene of Cryptosporidium spp. by nested PCR (nPCR) using the primers 5´-TTCTAGAGCTAATACATGCG-3 ‘ and 5 ‘-CCCATTTCCTTCGAAACAGGA-3 ‘ in the primary reaction, and the primers 5 ‘-GGAAGGGTTGTATTTATTAGATAAAG-3 ‘ and 5´-AAGGAGTAAGGAACAACCTCCA-3´ in the secondary reaction (Xiao et al. 2000). Both reactions were carried out under the following conditions: initial DNA denaturation at 94ºC for 3 min, followed by 34 cycles, each consisting of denaturation at 94ºC for 45 s, 45 s of annealing at 55ºC and 60 s of extension at 72º C, with a final extension at 72º C for 7 min.
The amplifications were confirmed by electrophoresis on a 2% agarose gel, followed by visualization of the amplified fragments (830 bp) in an ultraviolet light transilluminator. All samples positive for C. parvum were subjected to subtyping by a nested PCR targeting the GP60 gene using the primers 5′-ATAGTCTCC GCTGTATTC-3′ and 5′-GGAAGGAACGATGTATCT-3′ in the primary reaction and the primers 5′-TCCGCTGTATTCTCAGCC-3′ and 5′-GCAGAGGAACCAGCATC-3′ in the secondary reaction (Alves et al. 2003). The reactions consisted of an initial DNA denaturation at 95ºC for 3 min, followed by 40 cycles consisting of denaturation at 94ºC for 45 s, annealing at 50ºC for 45 s and extension at 72º C for 60 s, followed by a final extension at 72º C for 10 min.
When it was not possible to identify the species of Cryptosporidium by genetic sequencing of the 18S rRNA gene amplicon, a nested PCR protocol targeting the actin gene was performed using the primers 5’-ATGAGGATGAAGAAGATAAGCTATCAAGC-3’ and 5’- AGAAGACACTTTTCTGTGTGACAAT-3’, in the primary reaction and the primers 5’-CAAGCATTTGAGTTGTTGATCAA-3’ and 5’-TTTCTGTGTGACAATATGCATTGG-3’ in the secondary reaction, under the following reaction conditions: in the primary reaction the samples were subjected to initial DNA denaturation at 94ºC for five minutes, followed by 35 cycles, each consisting of denaturation for 45 s at 94ºC, annealing at 50ºC for 45 s and extension to 72ºC for 60 s, with a final extension at 72ºC for 10 min. In the secondary reaction, the same reaction conditions as the primary reaction were used, except for the annealing step that was carried out at 45ºC for 45 s (Sulaiman et al. 2002).
All products amplified by nPCRs were quantified by spectrophotometry and purified using the QIAquick ™ Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen). Afterward, the samples that presented a good quality and quantity of DNA (superior to 10 ng per uL) were sequenced using ABI Prism Dye terminator Cycling Sequence kit (Applied Biosystems) on an automatic sequencer ABI 3730XL (Applied Biosystems).
DNA sequences were assembled using the Codoncode Aligner version 7.1.1. software (CodonCode Corporation). The homology of products amplified by PCR to GenBank sequences was assessed using the BLAST tool (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi). Homologous sequences were aligned with the consensus sequences by Muscle (Edgar 2004) and BioEdit Sequence Alignment Editor (Hall 1999) software.
Phylogenetic analyses were conducted in MEGAX (Kumar et al. 2018) using maximum likelihood analysis based on the Tamura 3-parameter model (Tamura 1992) and the general time-reversible model (Nei and Kumar 2000) for 18S rRNA and actin genes, respectively. Initial tree(s) for the heuristic search were obtained automatically by applying neighbor-join and BioNJ algorithms to a matrix of pairwise distances estimated using the maximum composite likelihood (MCL) approach and then selecting the topology with superior log-likelihood value. Substitution models and optional parameter sets were chosen using the model selection option in MEGAX. Trees were rooted with sequences from Cryptosporidium molnari HM243548.1 and HM365219.1 for 18S rRNA and actin genes, respectively. The sequences that were chosen for 18S rRNA phylogenetic analysis were those that presented both higher genetic similarity to the sequences from this report and resulted in a phylogenetic tree with the best bootstrap support. This selection was performed by comparing the sequences obtained in this study with the sequences previously published in GenBank, using the BLAST tool of the NCBI. In this way, were selected to compose the phylogenetic trees sequences that showed similarity above 85%, in addition to those representing the main species of the genus Cryptosporidium, especially those that have been previously diagnosed in deer in the world.
Nucleotide sequences generated in this study were submitted to the GenBank database under the accession numbers MT327131.1, MT327132.1, MT327133.1, MT327134.1, MT327135.1, MT327136.1 and MT327137.1.
Statistical analysis
The data analysis was performed by McNemar test to verify the paired proportions and Kappa correlation coefficient (Landis and Koch 1977) to evaluate the agreement between nPCR (18S rRNA) and malachite green negative staining techniques. Fisher’s exact test was used to analyze the association between bovines and Cryptosporidium prevalence in each locality. All statistical results were considered significant when p < 0.05.
Results
The prevalence of Cryptosporidium spp. in fecal samples of cervids by nPCR (18S rRNA) and malachite green negative staining were 1.42% (8/563) and 0.36% (2/563), respectively, with a significant statistical difference (p = 0.0313) between the results of these two diagnostic techniques by McNemar test and the Kappa correlation coefficient p = 0.3966 (Table 2). We detected Cryptosporidium spp. in three cervids species from 35.7% (5/14) of the localities by nPCR (18S rRNA), according to the following indexes positivity by species: 4% (2/50) in B. dichotomus, 1.7% (2/114) in M. nana and 1.3% (4/296) in M. americana (Table 2 and Fig. 1). The presence of bovines was observed in 28.6% (4/14) of the sampled locations (Fig. 1). There was no association between the presence of bovines and infection by Cryptosporidium spp. in cervids by Fisher's exact test (p = 0.6426).
Sequence analysis of the 18S rRNA gene amplicons allowed the identification of Cryptosporidium species in seven of eight positive samples by nPCR. Cryptosporidium ryanae (100% of genetic similarity to sequence EU410344.1) was detected in a fecal sample of B. dichotomus and C. parvum (100% of similarity to sequence AF093490.1) in three fecal samples of M. americana, two of M. nana, and one of B. dichotomus. All C. parvum positive samples (6/6) were identified by sequencing of GP60 gene as subtype IIaA16G3R1 isolate (100% of similarity to sequence MH511485.1) (Table 2).
In a fecal sample of M. americana, a new Cryptosporidium genotype named deer genotype BR was identified by sequencing the 18S rRNA gene amplicon, with 99.2% similarity to C. ryanae (EU410344), 98.8% to Cryptosporidium bovis (AY741305.1) and 98.6% to Cryptosporidium xiaoi (FJ896053). Sequencing of actin gene amplicon of deer genotype BR showed 91.1% similarity to C. ryanae (EU410345.1) and 88.2% to Cryptosporidium sp. deer genotype (LC18998.1), with no significant similarity to C. bovis (AY741307.1). The results regarding the phylogenetic analyzes of the 18S rRNA and actin genes are illustrated in Figs. 2 and 3, respectively.
Discussion
Among the results obtained in the present study, we highlight the unprecedented report of Cryptosporidium spp. in feces of M. americana, M. nana, and B. dichotomus. As well as the occurrence of C. ryanae in feces of B. dichotomus, in addition to the evidence of a new Cryptosporidium genotype. It is relevant to inform that a variety of species and genotypes of Cryptosporidium have already been identified in fecal samples of cervids in many world regions (Robinson et al. 2011; García-Presedo et al. 2013; Santin and Fayer 2015; Wells et al. 2015; Kato et al. 2016; Kotková et al. 2016; Tao et al. 2020) however, there are few reports in Brazil (Reginatto et al. 2010; Ludwig and Marques 2011; Teixeira et al. 2021).
C. parvum was the most prevalent species in fecal samples of M. americana, M. nana and B. dichotomus. The occurrence of C. parvum in wild cervids has already been reported in different cervids species worldwide (Deng and Cliver 1999; Hajdušek et al. 2004; Wells et al. 2015), however, to date, it has not yet been reported in M. americana, M. nana and B. dichotomus. Prior to this study, there is only one report of subtype IIaA16G3R1 in deers (Teixeira et al. 2021). Subtype IIaA16G3R1 have been previously described in fecal samples from humans (Nazemalhosseini-Mojarad et al. 2011; Stensvold et al. 2015), bovines (Xiao et al. 2007; Brook et al. 2009; Nazemalhosseini-Mojarad et al. 2011; Rieux et al. 2013; Lee et al. 2016) sheeps, goats (Díaz et al. 2015), and yaks (Mi et al. 2013).
For the first time, C. ryanae was detected in B. dichotomus. Commonly diagnosed in cattle (Fayer et al. 2008), C. ryanae was described in deers (Capreolus capreolus) for the first time in Spain (García-Presedo et al. 2013). Previous reports of the occurrence of C. ryanae and C. parvum in deers, as well as the fact that cattle are the primary host of these parasites, motivated us to evaluate the correlation between the presence of cattle and the occurrence of C. ryanae in deers. It is important to note that the occurrence of Cryptosporidium in deers in the present study did not show a statistically significant relationship (p < 0.05) with the presence of cattle in the different locations where the samples were obtained. Such evidence was also observed at the Jataí Ecological Station, where the presence of fecal samples of B. dichotomous positive for C. parvum and C. ryanae was evidenced, although the presence of bovines was not observed in the locality.
Despite the negative relationship with the presence of cattle observed in the present study, Teixeira et al. (2021) observed a greater positivity for Cryptosporidium sp. in samples of M. gouazoubira obtained from localities where there was a large flow of cattle. Given such inferences, it is clear the need to assess the role of deer in the epidemiology of cryptosporidiosis in a given region, as well as the real influence that the concomitant presence of other hosts in the same habitat can influence Cryptosporidium infection in deers.
The sequencing, alignment, and phylogenetic analysis 18S rRNA and actin genes allowed the identification of a new Cryptosporidium genotype in a fecal sample of M. americana, named deer genotype BR. In phylogenetic tree, deer genotype BR grouped with intestinal Cryptosporidium species, with high bootstrap support, in the monophyletic group of C. ryanae (EU410344.1), C. bovis (AY741305.1), and C. xiaoi (FJ896053.1). In the actin gene phylogenetic tree, deer genotype BR grouped into the monophyletic group of C. ryanae (EU410345.1), with high bootstrap support. Phylogenetic analysis of Cryptosporidium spp. at the 18S rRNA and actin genes, showed that gastric and intestinal species of this genus tend to separate forming monophyletic groups among themselves (Xiao et al. 2004). This result may help future studies on the parasitic dynamics of the Cryptosporidium deer genotype BR.
Cryptosporidium deer genotype BR presented 99.2% of genetic similarity (GS) with a sample identified in sika deer from China as Cryptosporidium deer genotype (Tao et al. 2020) at the 18S rRNA gene (MN056199). High genetic similarity (88%) was also observed at the actin gene (LC018998) between deer genotype BR and a Cryptosporidium deer genotype identified in Cervus nippon yesoensis from Japan (Kato et al. 2016). According to Kváč et al., (2016), in the actin locus, Cryptosporidium proliferans is 99.4% similar to Cryptosporidium muris. In comparison, C. parvum and Cryptosporidium erinacei share 99.5% similarity at this locus. Regarding the 18S RNA locus, C. proliferans is 99.4% and 98.3% similar to C. muris and C. andersoni, respectively; this difference is comparable to the similarities between C. hominis and Cryptosporidium cuniculus (98.9%), C. parvum and C. erinacei (99.5%), and C. bovis and C. xiaoi (99.5%), showing that different species of Cryptosporidium can present high rates of genetic similarity at the 18S rRNA gene.
Similarity indices obtained in the present study between deer genotype BR and C. ryanae (FJ463206, MT507487, and EU410345) did not exceed 91.1%, being even lower (88.2%) when compared to Cryptosporidium sp. deer genotype (LC018998). Such inferences, together with the genetic distances observed between the deer genotype BR and the different species and genotypes included in phylogenetic analyses of the actin and 18S RNA genes, allowed us to suggest that the Cryptosporidium isolate identified in this study in B. dichotomus is a new genotype.
Positivity for Cryptosporidium spp. in fecal samples of cervids by nPCR (1,42%; 8/563 samples) was statistically superior to that obtained using the microscopy technique (0,36%; 2/563 samples). Although microscopy techniques are more used in laboratory routines, generally they have lower levels of sensitivity and specificity than molecular techniques (Meireles et al. 2011; Homem et al. 2012). Low sensitivity rates of microscopy techniques in the diagnosis of cryptosporidiosis are widely reported (Elliot et al. 1999; Meireles et al. 2011; Homem et al. 2012), usually leading to false-negative results when compared to more sensitive techniques, as observed in this study. In addition to being more sensitive, the use of molecular techniques in the present study enabled the detection and differentiation of Cryptosporidium species.
Although the highest number of positive samples was diagnosed in M. americana (four cases), the analyzes of the number of positive samples among the total number of samples collected from each deer species, showed a highest infection rate in B. dichotomus with 4% positivity in 50 samples analyzed, followed by M. nana with 1.7% in 114 samples, and M. americana with 1.3% in 296 samples. The highest occurrence in B. dichotomus is probably due to the feeding habits of these species. Unlike M. nana and M. americana, B. dichotomus have a “pasture-pruner” eating habit, ingesting tender and soft grasses together with shoots and legumes (Tomas and Salis 2000; Duarte 2001), which may have facilitated the ingestion of Cryptosporidium oocysts in the environment.
Epidemiological studies on the occurrence and distribution of Cryptosporidum spp. in fecal samples of different deer species from Brazil are especially important for programs for the preservation of cervids species in the country. Cryptosporidiosis can cause severe clinical signs, mainly in immunosuppressed animals infected with C. parvum, the most prevalent Cryptosporidium species in the present study. In addition, two deer species (B. dichotomus and M. nana), in which we have detected the presence of Cryptosporidium, are currently threatened with extinction (IUCN 2020). This fact is pointing to the need to evaluate the host-parasite relationship between Cryptosporidium and Brazilian wild cervids, which is still unknown in the worldwide literature.
Conclusion
In this study, we describe the first report of Cryptosporidium spp. in M. americana, M. nana and B. dichotomus species. In an unprecedented way, C. ryanae was isolated in a fecal sample of B. dichotomus. Sequences from actin and 18S rRNA genes from Cryptosporidium deer genotype BR identified in this study allowed us to infer that these sequences are related to a new Cryptosporidium genotype.
Data availability
The datasets in this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Alves M, Xiao L, Sulaiman I et al (2003) Subgenotype analysis of Cryptosporidium isolates from humans, cattle, and zoo ruminants in Portugal. J Clin Microbiol 41:2744–2747. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.41.6.2744-2747.2003
Araújo JP, Nogueira MF, Duarte JMB (2010) Survey for foot-and-mouth disease in the endangered marsh deer (Blastocerus dichotomus) from marshlands of the Paraná River Basin, Brazil. J Wildl Dis 46:939–943. https://doi.org/10.7589/0090-3558-46.3.939
Brook EJ, Anthony Hart C, French NP, Christley RM (2009) Molecular epidemiology of Cryptosporidium subtypes in cattle in England. Vet J 179:378–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tvjl.2007.10.023
Deng MQ, Cliver DO (1999) Improved immunofluorescence assay for detection of Giardia and Cryptosporidium from asymptomatic adult cervine animals. Parasitol Res 85:733–736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004360050623
Díaz P, Quílez J, Prieto A et al (2015) Cryptosporidium species and subtype analysis in diarrhoeic pre-weaned lambs and goat kids from north-western Spain. Parasitol Res 114:4099–4105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-015-4639-0
Duarte JMB, Merino ML (1997) Taxonomia e Evolução. In: Duarte JMB. Biologia e conservação de cervídeos sul-americanos: Blastocerus, Ozotoceros e Mazama. FUNEP, Jaboticabal, p. 1–21
Duarte JMB, Jorge W (2003) Morphologic and Cytogenetic Description of the Small Red Brocket (Mazama bororo Duarte, 1996) in Brazil. Mammalia 67:403–410. https://doi.org/10.1515/mamm.2003.67.3.403
Duarte JMB (1996) Guia de identificação de cervídeos brasileiros. 1.ed. Jaboticabal: FUNEP, p.14
Duarte JMB (2001) O Cervo-do-Pantanal (Blastocerus dichotomus) de Porto Primavera: Resultado de dois anos de pesquisa. Relatório técnico, FUNEP/CESP
Duarte JMB (2005) Ecologia e distribuição de Mazama bororo (Mammalia: Cervidae). Relatório Final de Pesquisa. FUNEP, Jaboticabal. p.104
Edgar RC (2004) MUSCLE: a multiple sequence alignment method with reduced time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformatics 5:113. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-5-113
Elliot A, Morgan UM, Thompson RC (1999) Improved staining method for detecting Cryptosporidium oocysts in stools using malachite green. J Gen Appl Microbiol 45:139–142. https://doi.org/10.2323/Jgam.45.139
Fayer R, Morgan U, Upton SJ (2000) Epidemiology of Cryptosporidium : Transmission, detection and identification. Int J Parasitol 30:1305–1322. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-7519(00)00135-1
Fayer R, Santín M, Trout JM (2008) Cryptosporidium ryanae n. sp. (Apicomplexa: Cryptosporidiidae) in cattle (Bos taurus). Vet Parasitol 156:191–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.05.024
Feng Y, Karna SR, Dearen TK, Singh DK, Adhikari LN, Shrestha A et al (2012) Common occurrence of a unique Cryptosporidium ryanae variant in zebu cattle and water buffaloes in the buffer zone of the Chitwan National Park. Nepal Vet Parasitol 185:309–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.09.025
Feng Y, Ryan UM, Xiao L (2018) Genetic diversity and population structure of Cryptosporidium. Trends Parasitol 34:997–1011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pt.2018.07.009
García-Presedo I, Pedraza-Díaz S, González-Warleta M et al (2013) The first report of Cryptosporidium bovis, C. ryanae and Giardia duodenalis sub-assemblage A-II in roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in Spain. Vet Parasitol 197:658–664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2013.07.002
González S, Maldonado JE, Ortega J et al (2009) Identification of the endangered small red brocket deer (Mazama bororo) using noninvasive genetic techniques (Mammalia; Cervidae). Mol Ecol Resour 9:754–758. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-0998.2008.02390.x
Hajdušek O, Ditrich O, Šlapeta J (2004) Molecular identification of Cryptosporidium spp. in animal and human hosts from the Czech Republic. Vet Parasitol 122:183–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.04.005
Hall TA (1999) BioEdit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symp Ser 41:95–98
Homem CG, Nakamura AA, Silva DC et al (2012) Real-time PCR assay targeting the actin gene for the detection of Cryptosporidium parvum in calf fecal samples. Parasitol Res 110:1741–1745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-011-2694-8
Huang J, Zhang Z, Zhang Y et al (2018) Prevalência e caracterização molecular de Cryptosporidium spp. e Giardia duodenalis em veados em Henan e Jilin China. Parasit Vectors 11:239. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-018-2813-9
IUCN 2020. The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2020–1. <http://www.iucnredlist.org>. Downloaded on 17 September 2020.
Jellison KL, Lynch AE, Ziemann JM (2009) Source tracking identifies deer and geese as vectors of human-infectious Cryptosporidium genotypes in an urban/suburban watershed. Environ Sci Technol 43:4267–4272. https://doi.org/10.1021/es900081m
Kato S, Yanagawa Y, Matsuyama R et al (2016) Molecular identification of the Cryptosporidium deer genotype in the Hokkaido sika deer (Cervus nippon yesoensis) in Hokkaido, Japan. Parasitol Res 115:1463–1471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-015-4880-6
Koehler AV, Haydon SR, Jex AR et al (2016) Cryptosporidium and Giardia taxa in faecal samples from animals in catchments supplying the city of Melbourne with drinking water (2011 to 2015). Parasites Vect 9:315. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-016-1607-1
Kotková M, Němejc K, Sak B, et al (2016) Cryptosporidium ubiquitum, C. muris and Cryptosporidium deer genotype in wild cervids and caprines in the Czech Republic. Folia Parasitol (Praha) 63:. https://doi.org/10.14411/fp.2016.003
Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M et al (2018) MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 35:1547–1549. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy096
Kváč M, Havrdová N, Hlásková L, et al (2016) Cryptosporidium proliferans n. sp. (Apicomplexa: Cryptosporidiidae): Molecular and Biological Evidence of Cryptic Species within Gastric Cryptosporidium of Mammals. PLoS ONE 11:e0147090. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147090
Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics 33:159. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
Lee SH, VanBik D, Kim HY et al (2016) Multilocus typing of Cryptosporidium spp. in young calves with diarrhea in Korea. Vet Parasitol 229:81–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2016.09.019
Ludwig R, Marques S (2011) Occurrence of Cryptosporidium spp. oocysts in mammals at a zoo in southern Brazil. Rev Ibero-Latinoamericana Parasitol 70:122–128
Machado RZ, Duarte JMB, Dagnone AS, Szabó MPJ (2006) Detection of Ehrlichia chaffeensis in Brazilian marsh deer (Blastocerus dichotomus). Vet Parasitol 139:262–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.02.038
Meireles MV, De Oliveira FP, Teixeira WFP et al (2011) Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in dairy calves from the state of São Paulo. Brazil Parasitol Res 109:949–951. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-011-2336-1
Meloni BP, Thompson RCA (1996) Simplified Methods for Obtaining Purified Oocysts from Mice and for Growing Cryptosporidium parvum In vitro. J Parasitol 82:757–762. https://doi.org/10.2307/3283888
Mi R, Wang X, Li C et al (2013) Prevalence and Genetic Characterization of Cryptosporidium in Yaks in Qinghai Province of China. PLoS ONE 8:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0074985
Nazemalhosseini-Mojarad E, Haghighi A, Taghipour N et al (2011) Subtype analysis of Cryptosporidium parvum and Cryptosporidium hominis isolates from humans and cattle in Iran. Vet Parasitol 179:250–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vetpar.2011.01.051
Nei M, Kumar S (2000) Molecular evolution and Phylogenetics. Oxford University Press, New York
Perz JF, Le Blancq SM (2001) Cryptosporidium parvum infection involving novel genotypes in wildlife from lower New York State. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:1154–1162. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.67.3.1154-1162.200119
Piovezan U, Tiepolo LM, Tomas WM, Duarte JMB, Varela D, Marinho Filho JS. 2010. Marsh deer Blastocerus dichotomus (Illiger, 1815), p. 66–76. In: Duarte JMB, Gonzales S. (Eds). Neotropical Cervidology: biology and medicine of Latin American deer. Jaboticabal, FUNEP/IUCN
Reginatto AR, Farret MH, Fanfa VR et al (2010) Report of cryptosporidiosis in gray brocket deer (Mazama gouazoupira) in southern Brazil. Comp Clin Pathol 19:523–525. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00580-010-1044-z
Rieux A, Chartier C, Pors I et al (2013) Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium isolates from high-excreting young dairy calves in dairy cattle herds in Western France. Parasitol Res 112:3423–3431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-013-3520-2
Robinson G, Chalmers RM, Stapleton C et al (2011) A whole water catchment approach to investigating the origin and distribution of Cryptosporidium species. J Appl Microbiol 111:717–730. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2011.05068.x
Santin M, Fayer R (2015) Enterocytozoon bieneusi, Giardia, and Cryptosporidium infecting white-tailed deer. J Eukaryot Microbiol 62:34–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeu.12155
Souza JN, de Oliveira ML, Duarte JMB (2013) A PCR/RFLP methodology to identify non-Amazonian Brazilian deer species. Conserv Genet Resour 5:639–641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-013-9870-3
Stensvold CR, Ethelberg S, Hansen L et al (2015) Cryptosporidium infections in Denmark, 2010–2014. Dan Med J 62:3–6
Sulaiman IM, Lal AA, Xiao L (2002) Molecular Phylogeny and Evolutionary Relationships of Cryptosporidium Parasites at the Actin Locus. J Parasitol 88:388. https://doi.org/10.2307/3285594
Szabó MPJ, Labruna MB, Pereira MC, Duarte JMB (2009) Ticks (Acari: Ixodidae) on Wild Marsh-Deer (Blastocerus dichotomus) from Southeast Brazil: Infestations Before and After Habitat Loss. J Med Entomol 40:268–274. https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-2585-40.3.268
Tao WF, Ni HB, Du HF et al (2020) Molecular detection of Cryptosporidium and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in dairy calves and sika deer in four provinces in Northern China. Parasitol Res 119:105–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-019-06498-1
Teixeira WFP, De Oliveira ML, Peres PHF, et al (2021) Cryptosporidium parvum in brown brocket (Mazama gouazoubira) from Brazil: First report of the subtype IIaA16G3R1 in cervids. Parasitol International 80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parint.2020.102216
Tomas WM, Salis SM (2000) Diet of the marsh deer (Blastocerus dichotomus) in the Pantanal wetland, Brazil. Stud Neotrop Fauna Environ 35:165–172. https://doi.org/10.1076/snfe.35.3.165.8861
Wells B, Shaw H, Hotchkiss E et al (2015) Prevalence, species identification and genotyping Cryptosporidium from livestock and deer in a catchment in the Cairngorms with a history of a contaminated public water supply. Parasit Vectors 8:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13071-015-0684-x
Xiao L, Limor J, Morgan UM et al (2000) Sequence differences in the diagnostic target region of the oocyst wall protein gene of Cryptosporidium parasites. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:5499–5502. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.66.12.5499-5502.2000
Xiao L, Fayer R, Ryan U, Upton SJ (2004) Cryptosporidium Taxonomy: Recent Advances and Implications for Public Health. Clin Microbiol Rev 17:72–97. https://doi.org/10.1128/CMR.17.1.72-97.2004
Xiao L, Zhou L, Santin M et al (2007) Distribution of Cryptosporidium parvum subtypes in calves in eastern United States. Parasitol Res 100:701–706. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00436-006-0337-2
Xie F, Zhang Z, Zhao A et al (2019) Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in Père David’s deer (Elaphurus davidianus) from Shishou. China Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl 10:184–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijppaw.2019.09.001
Zahedi R, Ryan U (2020) Cryptosporidium – an update with an emphasis on foodborne and waterborne transmission. Res. Vet. Sci. 132:500–512. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rvsc.2020.08.002
Zhao W, Xu J, Xiao M et al (2020) Prevalence and Characterization of Cryptosporidium Species and Genotypes in Four Farmed Deer Species in the Northeast of China. Front Vet Sci 7:430. https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00430
Acknowledgements
We thank to the Brazilian Institute for the Environment and Renewable Natural Resources (Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis – IBAMA), Secretariat of Infrastructure and Environment (Secretaria de Infraestrutura e Meio Ambiente—SMA/SP), and the Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária—EMBRAPA/Pantanal) for sampling authorization. Also we want to thank you the Ph.D. student Timothy Hackett from UNL (University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Department of Biochemistry) for reviewing the english.
Funding
We thank to the São Paulo Research Foundation for financial assistance for field activities and laboratory activities [grants #15/10086–5, #15/25742–5, #12/50206–1, #10/50748–3—Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)], and to the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (grants #304456/2016–0 and #407777/2016—Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico—CNPq).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: WFPT, JMBD; Methodology: WFPT, MLO, PHFP, BCMO; Formal analysis and investigation: WFPT, WBN, AMAJ; Writing—original draft preparation: WFPT, DSV; Writing—review and editing: WFPT, DSV, ELD, MVM, WDZL, KDSB; Funding acquisition: WFPT, JMBD, KDSB; Resources: JMBD, MVM, KDSB; Supervision: JMBD, MVM, KDSB.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical committee
All the samples from animals used in this research followed ethical principles in animal research and welfare. This is study was performed and approved according to Ethical Principles of Animal Experimentation of the São Paulo State University, College of Agricultural and Veterinary Sciences, Jaboticabal (FCAV/UNESP), protocol number 15134/16.
Conflict of interest
Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Consent to participate
All authors participated and helped voluntarily in the research.
Consent for publication
All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pires Teixeira, W.F., de Oliveira, M.L., de Faria Peres, P.H. et al. FIRST REPORT OF GENUS Cryptosporidium IN CERVIDS SPECIES: Mazama americana, Mazama nana AND Blastocerus dichotomus. Vet Res Commun 46, 49–58 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-021-09828-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11259-021-09828-w