Abstract
This paper retrieves a spectrum of soliton solutions propagating through magneto-optic waveguides that maintain a wide range of nonlinear refractive index structures. The implemented algorithm is the extended version of \(G^{\prime }/G\)–expansion scheme. The existence criteria for such solitons are also presented.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
One of the most detrimental features in soliton transmission across intercontinental distances is soliton clutter. In order to address this, a very clever approach has been adopted in several forms of fibers all across the board. This is the introduction of magnetic field in a variety of fibers. Such a situation would definitely curtail this clutter and consequently the possible loss of information during soliton propagation would be controlled and mitigated. Therefore, it is imperative to address this important and essential feature, in its comprehensive form, for a wide range of optical fibers with a diverse form of nonlinear refractive index. This current work addresses soliton dynamics with a wide range of optical fibers by the aid of an extended version of the popular \(G^{\prime }/G\)–expansion approach. This would lead to the retrieval of a range of soliton solutions that would be otherwise not possible to reveal by its original form of this integration architecture. The existence criteria for such solitons is also exhibited in the work. The details now follow through after a succinct intro to the governing model.
1.1 Mathematical model
The mathematical model that describes the dynamics of soliton propagation through optical fibers in presence of magneto-optic field is given by the following coupled system of nonlinear Schrödinger’s equation (NLSE) (Biswas 2004; Biswas and Konar 2006; Biswas et al. 2018; Guzman et al. 2014; Savescu et al. 2014):
Here, in (1) and (2), \(a_j\) stands for the coefficients of group velocity dispersion (GVD) while \(b_j\) for \(j=1, 2\) are the coefficients of spatio-temporal dispersion (STD). The functional F is the type of nonlinearity that will be considered. On the right hand side \(Q_j\) stands for the magnetic field effect that avoids the formation of soliton clutter. From the perturbation terms, \(\alpha _j\) are the coefficients of intermodal dispersion. Also, \(\beta _j\) represents the coefficients of self-steepening terms, \(\nu _j\) are the coefficients of nonlinear dispersion, while \(\theta _j\) also gives nonlinear dispersion. The next sections detail the integration algorithm for nine types of nonlinearity.
2 Kerr law
For Kerr law nonlinearity, \(F(s)=s\). Then, Eqs. (1) and (2) reduce to
In order for integrating the the systems (3)–(4), a solution structure of the form is picked as
where \(\zeta\) that represents the wave variable is given by
Here, \(P_l(\zeta )\) for \(l=1, 2\) stand for the amplitude component of the soliton and v is the soliton speed, while phase factor is structured as
where \(\kappa\) is the frequency while \(\omega\) is the wave number and \(\theta\) is the phase constant. Inserting (5) and (6) into Eqs. (3) and (4) real parts give
with \({\bar{l}}=3-l\), and imaginary parts read
From Eq. (10) is possible to recover the velocity of the soliton
as long as the constraint
remains valid. Now, (11) implies that
and then, (11) modifies to
where it is assumed that \(a_l=a\), \(b_l=b\) and \(\alpha _l=\alpha\) for \(l=1, 2.\) So the coupled NLSE having Kerr law nonlinearity for the perturbed magneto-optic waveguide is re-casted as
and as a results the real part given by (9) changes to
Utilizing the balancing principle in Eq. (17) brings about
Therefore, Eq. (17) modifies to
2.1 Extended \(G^{\prime }/G-\)expansion approach
This subsection will apply extended \(G^{\prime }/G-\)expansion scheme (Ekici et al. 2016; Guo and Zhou 2010; Hayek 2010; Zhou et al. 2016) in order to address the systems (1) and (2). To kick off, the assumption for the soliton structure is taken to be
where \(\alpha _0^{(l)}\), \(\alpha _i^{(l)}\), \(\beta _i^{(l)}\), \(\gamma _i^{(l)}\), \(\delta _i^{(l)}\) \((i=1,\ldots ,M)\) are constants to be fixed later, \(\sigma =\pm 1\), and M is a positive integer, and \(G=G(\zeta )\) ensures
where \(\mu\) is a constant to be identified later. Also, Eq. (21) has the following solutions according to the state of parameter \(\mu\).
-
(i)
When \(\mu < 0\), solutions are of hyperbolic-type as
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{G'}{G} = \sqrt{-\mu } \left[ \frac{A_1\sinh (\sqrt{-\mu }\zeta )+A_2\cosh (\sqrt{-\mu }\zeta )}{A_1\cosh (\sqrt{-\mu }\zeta )+A_2\sinh (\sqrt{-\mu }\zeta )}\right] \end{aligned}$$(22)where \(A_j\) for \(j=1, 2\) are arbitrary constants and \(A_1\ne A_2\).
-
(ii)
For \(\mu >0\), solutions are of trigonometric-type as
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{G'}{G} = \sqrt{\mu } \left[ \frac{A_1\cos (\sqrt{\mu }\zeta )-A_2\sin (\sqrt{\mu }\zeta )}{A_1\sin (\sqrt{\mu }\zeta )+A_2\cos (\sqrt{\mu }\zeta )}\right] \end{aligned}$$(23)where \(A_j\) for \(j=1, 2\) are arbitrary constants.
-
(iii)
Finally, \(\mu =0\), solutions are of rational-type as
$$\begin{aligned} \frac{G'}{G} = \frac{A_1}{A_1\zeta +A_2} \end{aligned}$$(24)
where \(A_j\) for \(j=1, 2\) are arbitrary constants.
Next, balancing \(P_l^{\prime \prime }\) with \(P_l^3\) in (19) gives \(M=1\). Then, the solution of Eq. (19) becomes
Plugging (25) with (21) into (19) and handing the resulting system, the following solution sets are derived:
Set-1
Set-2
Set-3
Set-4
Set-5
Here \(\kappa\) and \(\mu\) are arbitrary constants.
As a results, inserting the sets (26)–(30) along with the solutions of (21) into (20), and then considering the wave transformations (5) and (6), solutions to the systems (3) and (4) are revealed as below:
For \(\mu <0\), hyperbolic function solutions procured are:
where \(\zeta = x- \left( \frac{b\omega - 2a\kappa -\alpha }{1-b \kappa } \right) t\) and \(\omega\) are given by the sets (26)–(30), respectively.
If, however, \(\mu >0\), trigonometric function solutions acquired are:
where \(\zeta = x- \left( \frac{b\omega - 2a\kappa -\alpha }{1-b \kappa } \right) t\) and \(\omega\) are given by the sets (26)–(30), respectively.
Finally, whenever \(\mu =0\), plane wave solutions secured are: By Eqs. (26) and (30), one gets
while, by the help of Eq. (28), one has
where \(\zeta = x- \left( \frac{b\omega - 2a\kappa -\alpha }{1-b \kappa } \right) t\) and \(\omega\) is given by the sets (26) and (28).
The special cases are listed as:
For \(\mu <0\) and \(A_1^2>A_2^2\), the solutions from (31) to (40) turn into the following optical soliton solutions, respectively:
Dark solitons
bright solitons
singular solitons
complexiton solutions
and singular solitons
where \(\zeta _0=\tanh ^{-1}(A_2/A_1)\). Also, taking \(A_1=0\), \(A_2\ne 0\) or \(A_2=0\), \(A_1\ne 0\) in the solutions form (31) to (40), more solitary wave solutions can be recovered. However, these are omitted.
If, however, \(\mu >0\), the solutions from (41) to (50) turn into periodic waves, respectively
where \(\zeta _0=\tan ^{-1}(A_1/A_2)\). Also, setting \(A_1=0\), \(A_2\ne 0\) or \(A_2=0\), \(A_1\ne 0\) in the solutions from (31) to (40), more periodic waves can be procured. However, these are ignored.
A few numerical simulations which stand for bright and dark soliton profile are exhibited as the following. The picked parameter values are also indicated respectively.
The profiles of dark solitons are represented by Fig. 1. The parameter values chosen are \(a= 0.25, \ b= 1.5, \ \alpha = 0.15, \ \zeta _0 = 0, \ \kappa = 0.1, \ \mu = -1, \ \omega = 0.7, \ \alpha _1^{(1)} =1, \ \alpha _1^{(2)} =2.\)
That of bright solitons are given by Fig. 2. In this case, the picked parameter values are \(a= 0.25, \ b= 1.5, \ \alpha = 0.15, \ \zeta _0 = 0, \ \kappa = 0.1, \ \mu = -1, \ \omega = 0.7, \ \beta _1^{(1)} =1, \ \beta _1^{(2)} =2.\)
3 Power law
For power law nonlinearity, \(F(s)=s^n\), where n stands for the power law nonlinearity parameter. Here the parameter n is in the range \(0<n<2\) and also \(n\ne 2\) for avoiding self-focusing singularity. Therefore, the system given by (1) and (2) collapses to
Insert (5) and (6) into (75) and (76). The real parts lead to
while the imaginary parts imply
From (78) is possible to obtain the solitons speed (11) as long as the constraint
remains valid. As a consequence (13) and (14) are also satisfied in this case, and the real part (77) simplifies to
From the balancing principle
and then Eq. (80) changes to
Set
so that (82) turns into
3.1 Extended \(G^{\prime }/G-\)Expansion approach
Balancing \(U_l U_l^{\prime \prime }\) or \((U_l')^2\) with \(U_l^3\) in Eq. (84) gives \(M = 2\). Thus, one reaches
Proceeding as in the previous section, the following solutions are recovered:
For \(\mu <0\) and \(A_1^2>A_2^2\), one secures bright solitons
singular solitons
complexiton solutions
and singular solitons
where \(\zeta _0=\tanh ^{-1}(A_2/A_1).\) If, however, \(\mu >0\), one gets periodic waves as:
where \(\zeta _0=\tan ^{-1}(A_1/A_2).\)
The profiles of bright solitons are stood for by Fig. 3. The parameter values picked are \(n=0.8, \kappa = -1, \ a= 1, \ b= 0.5, \xi _1 = 0.1, \xi _2 = 0.2, \beta _1 = 0.5, \beta _2 = 0.4, \theta _1 = -0.3, \theta _2 = -0.1, \eta _1 = 0.4, \eta _2 = 0.4, \mu = -0.5 , \alpha = 1, \zeta _0 = 0, \omega = 1. \)
4 Quadratic-cubic law
In this case, \(F(s)=c_{1}\sqrt{s}+c_{2}s\) where \(c_{1}\) and \(c_{2}\) are constants. The system (1)–(2) therefore is:
Substitute (5) and (6) into (102) and (103). The obtained real and imaginary parts are
and
respectively. From (105) is possible to get the solitons speed (11) as long as the constraints
remain valid. Next, from (106) and (107)
As a result (13) and (14) are also satisfied in this case, and the real part (104) simplifies to
Employing the balancing principle in Eq. (111) gives rise to
Then, Eq. (111) modifies to
4.1 Extended \(G^{\prime }/G-\)expansion approach
Balancing \(P_l''\) with \(P_l^3\) in Eq. (113), yields \(M = 1\). Thus, one has
Proceeding as in previous sections, one derives the following solutions:
If \(\mu <0\) and \(A_1^2>A_2^2\), one secures dark solitons
for
bright solitons
for
singular solitons
for
complexiton solutions
for
singular solitons
for
and complexiton solutions
for
where \(\zeta _0=\tanh ^{-1}(A_2/A_1).\) If, however, \(\mu >0\), one obtains periodic waves as follows:
where \(\zeta _0=\tan ^{-1}(A_1/A_2)\). These trigonometric function solution pairs exist as long as Eqs. (117), (120), (123), (126), (129) and (132) remain valid, respectively.
The profiles of dark solitons are represented by Fig. 4. The parameter values chosen are \(\kappa = 1, \ a= 1, \ b= 2, \ \mu = -1 , \ \alpha = 1, \ \alpha _0^{(1)}=1, \ \alpha _0^{(2)}=2, \ \zeta _0 = 0, \ \omega = 1 .\)
That of bright solitons are given by Fig. 5. In this case, the picked parameter values are \(\kappa = 1, \ a= 1, \ b= 2, \ \mu = -1 , \ \alpha = 1, \ \alpha _0^{(1)}=1, \ \alpha _0^{(2)}=2, \ \zeta _0 = 0, \ \omega = 1 .\)
5 Parabolic law
For parabolic law nonlinearity, \(F(s)=c_{1}s+c_{2}s^2\) where \(c_{1}\) and \(c_{2}\) are constants. The system (1)–(2) therefore takes the form
Put (5) and (6) into (145) and (146). The real part gives
while the imaginary part leads to
From (148) is possible to retrieve the solitons speed (11) as long as the constraints
remain valid. Then, from (149) and (150)
As a results, (13) and (14) are also satisfied in this case, and the real part (147) changes to
The balancing principle implies that
In this case, Eq. (154) becomes to
Set
so that (156) transform to
5.1 extended \(G^{\prime }/G-\)expansion approach
Balancing \(U_l U_l''\) or \(\left( U_l' \right) ^2\) with \(U_l^4\) in Eq. (158) causes \(M = 1\). Thus, one discovers
In this case, solutions are:
When \(\mu <0\) and \(A_1^2>A_2^2\), one attains optic soliton solutions as
for
for
for
for
for
for
where \(\zeta _0=\tanh ^{-1}(A_2/A_1)\) and
If, however, \(\mu >0\), one gains periodic waves as:
where \(\zeta _0=\tan ^{-1}(A_1/A_2).\) These trigonometric function solution pairs exist as long as Eqs. (162), (165), (168), (171), (174) and (177) remain valid, respectively.
The profiles of dark solitons are given by Fig. 6. The chosen parameter values are \(\kappa = 1, \ a= 1, \ b= 2, \ \xi _1 = 1.2, \ \xi _2 = 0.7, \ \beta _1 = 0.4, \ \beta _2 = 0.6, \ \theta _1 = 0.3, \ \theta _2 = 0.1, \ \eta _1 = -0.3, \ \eta _2 = 0.4, \ \mu = -1 , \ \alpha = 1, \ \zeta _0 = 0, \ \omega = 1, \ c_1=1.\)
That of bright solitons are represented by Fig. 7. In this case, the parameter values picked are \(\kappa = 1, \ a= 1, \ b= 2, \ \xi _1 = 1.3, \ \xi _2 = 1.6, \ \beta _1 = 0.6, \ \beta _2 = 0.2, \ \theta _1 = 1.3, \ \theta _2 = 0.7, \ \eta _1 = 1.2, \ \eta _2 = 0.9, \ \mu = -1 , \ \alpha = 1, \ \zeta _0 = 0, \ \omega = 1, \ c_1=1.\)
6 Dual-power law
For dual-power law nonlinearity, \(F(s)=c_{1}s^n+c_{2}s^{2n}\) where \(c_{1}\) and \(c_{2}\) are constants. Therefore, the governing model reduces to
Plug (5) and (6) into (191) and (192). The real part obtained is
while the imaginary part reads
From (194) is possible to retrieve the solitons speed (11) as long as the constraints
remain valid. Then, form (195) and (196)
Consequently (13) and (14) are also satisfied in this case, and the real part (193) simplifies to
By virtue of the balancing principle, it is explored that
So, Eq. (200) changes to
In order for finding closed form solutions, the transform
is applied to (202) and so (202) turns into
6.1 Extended \(G^{\prime }/G-\)expansion approach
Balancing \(U_l U_l''\) or \(\left( U_l' \right) ^2\) with \(U_l^{4}\) in Eq. (84) leads to \(M = 1\). Therefore, one reaches
Proceeding as in previous sections, the following solutions are discovered:
When \(\mu <0\) and \(A_1^2>A_2^2\), one extracts optic solitons as the following:
for
for
for
for
where \(\zeta _0=\tanh ^{-1}(A_2/A_1)\) and
If, however, \(\mu >0\), one achieves periodic waves as:
where \(\zeta _0=\tan ^{-1}(A_1/A_2)\). These trigonometric function solution pairs exist as long as Eqs. (208), (211), (214) and (217) remain valid, respectively.
The profiles of dark solitons are represented by Fig. 8. The parameter values chosen are \(n=1, \ \kappa = 1, \ a= 2, \ b= 3, \ \eta _1 = 1.6, \ \eta _2 = 1.5, \ \xi _1 = 1.4, \ \xi _2 = 1.2, \ \beta _1 = 0.6, \ \beta _2 = 0.4, \ \theta _1 = 0.5, \ \theta _2 = 0.1, \ \mu = -1 , \ \alpha = 1, \ \zeta _0 = 0, \ \omega = 1, \ c_1 = 1.\)
7 Anti-cubic law
In this case, \(F(s)=c_{1}s^{-2}+c_{2}s+c_{3}s^{2}\) where \(c_{1}\), \(c_{2}\) and \(c_{3}\) are all constants. Therefore the system given by (1) and (2) collapses to
Substitute (5) and (6) into (227) and (228). The recovered real and imaginary parts are
and
respectively. From (230) is possible to get the solitons speed (11) as long as the constraints
remain valid. From here
Consequently (13) and (14) are also satisfied in this case, and the real part (229) becomes
Employing the balancing principle gives
and then, Eq. (237) becomes to
To derive closed form solutions, one utilizes the transformation
Thus (239) turns into
7.1 EXTENDED \(G^{\prime }/G-\)EXPANSION APPROACH
Balancing \(U_l U_l''\) or \(\left( U_l' \right) ^2\) with \(U_l^{4}\) in Eq. (241) yields \(M = 1\). Thus,
Proceeding as in previous sections, the solutions acquired are:
For \(\mu <0\) and \(A_1^2>A_2^2\), one gets optic solitons as
for
for
for
for
for
where \(\zeta _0=\tanh ^{-1}(A_2/A_1)\) and
If, however, \(\mu >0\), one has periodic waves as
where \(\zeta _0=\tan ^{-1}(A_1/A_2)\). These trigonometric function solution pairs exist as long as Eqs. (245), (248), (251), (254) and (257) remain valid, respectively.
The profiles of dark solitons are stood for by Fig. 9. The parameter values chosen are \(\kappa = 1, \ a= 1, \ b= 2, \ \xi _1 = 1.5, \ \xi _2 = 1.9, \ \beta _1 = 1.6, \ \beta _2 = 0.4, \ \theta _1 = 1.4, \ \theta _2 = 0.7, \ \eta _1 = 1.7, \ \eta _2 = 2.1, \ \mu = -1 , \ \alpha = 1, \ \zeta _0 = 0, \ \omega = 1, \ c_2 = 2, \ c_3 = 3 .\)
8 Polynomial law
In this case, \(F(s)=c_{1}s+c_{2}s^{2}+c_{3}s^{3}\) where \(c_{1}\), \(c_{2}\) and \(c_{3}\) are all constants. Therefore the system (1)–(2) is given by
Put (5) and (6) into (269) and (270). The real part gives
while the imaginary part implies
From (272) is possible in order to procure the solitons speed (11) as long as the constraints
remain valid. Then form (273) and (275)
As a results (13) and (14) are also satisfied in this case, and the real part (271) becomes
From the balancing principle, one gets
Thus, Eq. (279) reduces to
Set
so that (281) transform to
8.1 Extended \(G^{\prime }/G-\)expansion approach
According to the homogeneous balance method, one reveals
Proceeding as in previous sections, the secured solutions are:
If \(\mu <0\) and \(A_1^2>A_2^2\), one attains complexiton solutions
and singular solitons
where \(\zeta _0=\tanh ^{-1}(A_2/A_1)\) and
If, however, \(\mu >0\), one obtains periodic waves as
where \(\zeta _0=\tan ^{-1}(A_1/A_2)\).
The profiles of bright solitons are given by Fig. 10. The parameter values picked are \(\kappa = 1, \ a= 2, \ b= 3, \ \xi _1 = 1.6, \ \xi _2 = 1.8, \ \beta _1 = 0.4, \ \beta _2 = 0.6, \ \theta _1 = 0.1, \ \theta _2 = 0.4, \ \eta _1 = 0.7, \ \eta _2 = 1.9, \ \mu = -1 , \ \alpha = 1, \ \zeta _0 = 0, \ \omega = 1, \ c_3=-3.\)
9 Triple-power law
In this case, \(F(s)=c_{1}s^{n}+c_{2}s^{2n}+c_{3}s^{3n}\) where \(c_{1}\), \(c_{2}\) and \(c_{3}\) are all constants. Therefore Eqs. (1) and (2) collapse to
Upon inserting (5) and (6) into (294) and (295) the resulting real part recovered is
and for the imaginary part
From (297) is possible to derive the solitons speed (11) as long as the constraints
remain valid. Then, from (298) and (300)
Consequently (13) and (14) are also satisfied in this case, and the real part (296) becomes
The balancing principle implies that
Therefore, Eq. (304) modifies to
To investigate closed form solutions to the adopted model, the transformation
is done and in this case, (306) turns into
9.1 Extended \(G^{\prime }/G-\)expansion approach
From the principle of homogeneous balance
Proceeding as in previous sections, the solutions retrieved are:
When \(\mu <0\) and \(A_1^2>A_2^2\), one secures bright solitons
and complexiton solutions
where \(\zeta _0=\tanh ^{-1}(A_2/A_1)\) and
If, however, \(\mu >0\), one acquires periodic waves as
where \(\zeta _0=\tan ^{-1}(A_1/A_2)\).
The profiles of bright solitons are represented by Fig.11. The chosen parameter values are \(n=2, \ \kappa = 1, \ a= 1, \ b= 2, \ \xi _1 = 1.6, \ \xi _2 = 1.7, \ \beta _1 = 0.8, \ \beta _2 = 0.2, \ \theta _1 = 0.7, \ \theta _2 = 0.4, \ \eta _1 = 2, \ \eta _2 = 2.2, \ \mu = -1 , \ \alpha = 1, \ \zeta _0 = 0, \ \omega = 1, \ c_3 = -2 .\)
10 Parabolic law with weak non-local nonlinearity
In this case, \(F(s)=c_{1}s+c_{2}s^2+c_{3}s_{xx}\) where \(c_{1}\), \(c_{2}\) and \(c_{3}\) are constants. Therefore the system (1)–(2) is given by
Upon putting (5) and (6) into (319) and (320) the recovered real part is
while the imaginary part reads as
From (322) is possible to get the solitons speed (11) as long as the constraints
remain valid. From here
As a consequence (13) and (14) are also satisfied in this case, and the real part (321) changes to
The balancing principle brings about
Then, Eq. (329) becomes
10.1 Extended \(G^{\prime }/G-\)expansion approach
Balancing \(P_l^2 P_l''\) with \(P_l^5\) in Eq. (331) yields \(M = 1\). Thus, one gets
Proceeding as in previous sections, the solutions obtained are:
When \(\mu <0\) and \(A_1^2>A_2^2\), one secures optic solitons as
for
for
for
for
for
where \(\zeta _0=\tanh ^{-1}(A_2/A_1).\) If, however, \(\mu >0\), one constructs periodic waves as
where \(\zeta _0=\tan ^{-1}(A_1/A_2)\). These trigonometric function solution pairs exist as long as Eqs. (335), (338), (341), (344) and (347) remain valid, respectively.
The profiles of dark solitons are stood for by Fig. 12. The parameter values chosen are \(\kappa = 2, \ a= 1, \ b= 2, \ \xi _1 = 3, \ \xi _2 = 4.2, \ \eta _1 = 2, \ \eta _2 = 3.5, \ \mu = -1 , \ \alpha = 1, \ \zeta _0 = 0, \ \omega = 1, \ c_1 = 0.1, \ c_3 =0.3 .\)
That of bright solitons are represented by Fig. 13. In this case, the parameter values picked are \(\kappa = 2, \ a= 1, \ b= 2, \ \xi _1 = 3.3, \ \xi _2 = 5.3, \ \eta _1 = 4.6, \ \eta _2 = 3.6, \ \mu = -1 , \ \alpha = 1, \ \zeta _0 = 0, \ \omega = 1, \ c_1 = 0.2, \ c_3 =0.1 .\)
11 Conclusions
This paper is an application of the extended \(G^{\prime }/G\)–expansion scheme to retrieve solitons and complexitons to magneto-optic waveguides that are considered with a wide range of nonlinear refractive index structures. The soliton solutions that emerged appear with parameter restructures that fall out naturally from its mathematical structure. These soliton solutions in magneto-optic waveguides open up a floodgate of opportunities to venture further along in this avenue (Dötsch et al. 2005; Haider 2017; Hasegawa and Miyazaki 1992; Kudryashov 2019; Shoji and Mizumoto 2018; Kudryashov 2019a, b, 2020, 2019; Kudryashov and Antonova 2020; Kudryashov 2020a, b, c, 2021a, b, c; Kudryashov and Safanova 2021; Biswas 2020; Zayed et al. 2020, Zayed et al. 2021; Vega–Guzman et al. 2021; Gonzalez–Gaxiola et al. 2021; Yildirim et al. 2021, 2021, xxxx, yyyy, Zayed et al. 2020a, b, c, d, 2021a, b; Daoui et al. 2021; Biswas et al. 2020; Liu et al. 2020a, b; Yu et al. 2020; Yan et al. 2020; Biswas et al. 2020; Meradji et al. 2020; Merabti et al. 2020; Sassaroli et al. 2001; Višňovskỳ et al. 2006). One now needs to locate the conservation laws for these solitons and consequently address the quasi-monochromatic dynamics of such solitons with weak perturbation effects. Subsequently, the quasi-stationary soliton solutions will be recovered for such models. With the aid of quasimonochromatic dynamics, quasi-particle theory shall be established to suppress the intra-channel collision of solitons while propagating through such magneto-optic waveguides. The results of these research activities shall be disseminated. Those hungry readers are suggested to stay tuned with patience!!!
References
Biswas, A., Ekici, M., Sonmezoglu, A., Zhou, Q., Moshokoa, S.P., Belic, M.R 2020 Optical solitons in birefringent fibers with four-wave mixing by extended trial equation method. Scientia Iranica. Trans. D Comput. Sci. Eng. Electr. 27(6), 3035–3052
Biswas, A.: Solitons in magneto-optic waveguides. Appl. Math. Comput. 153(2), 387–393 (2004)
Biswas, A.: Optical soliton cooling with polynomial law of nonlinear refractive index. J. Opt. 49(4), 580–583 (2020)
Biswas, A., Konar, S.: Introduction to non-Kerr law optical solitons. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL (2006)
Biswas, A., Arnous, A.H., Ekici, M., Sonmezoglu, A., Seadawy, A.R., Zhou, Q., Mahmood, M.F., Moshokoa, S.P., Belic, M.: Optical soliton perturbation in magneto-optic waveguides. J. Nonlinear Opt. Phys. Mater. 27(01), 1850005 (2018)
Biswas, A., Kara, A.H., Zhou, Q., Alzahrani, A.K., Belic, M.R.: Conservation laws for highly dispersive optical solitons in birefringent fibers. Reg. Chaotic Dynam. 25(2), 166–177 (2020)
Daoui, A.K., Messouber, A., Triki, H., Zhou, Q., Biswas, A., Liu, W., Alzahrani, A.K., Belic, M.R.: Propagation of chirped periodic and localized waves with higher-order effects through optical fibers. Chaos Solit. Fract. 146, 110873 (2021)
Dötsch, H., Bahlmann, N., Zhuromskyy, O., Hammer, M., Wilkens, L., Gerhardt, R., Hertel, P., Popkov, A.F.: Applications of magneto-optical waveguides in integrated optics: review. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B. 22(1), 240–253 (2005)
Ekici, M., Mirzazadeh, M., Sonmezoglu, A., Zhou, Q., Moshokoa, S.P., Biswas, A., Milivoj Belic. “Dark and singular optical solitons with Kundu-Eckhaus equation by extended trial equation method and extended \(G^{\prime }/G\)–expansion scheme”. Optik. 127(22), 10490–10497. (2016)
Gonzalez-Gaxiola, O., Biswas, A., Ekici, M., Khan, S.: Highly dispersive optical solitons with quadratic-cubic law of refractive index by the variational iteration method. J. Opt. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12596-020-00671-x
Guo, S., Zhou, Y.: The extended \((G^{\prime }/G)\)-expansion method and its applications to Whitham-Broer-Kaup like equations and coupled Hirota-Satsuma KdV equations. Appl. Math. Comput. 215(9), 3214–3221 (2010)
Guzman, J.V., Alshaery, A.A., Hilal, E.M., Bhrawy, A.H., Mahmood, M.F., Moraru, L., Biswas, A.: Optical soliton perturbation in magneto-optic waveguides with spatio-temporal dispersion. J. Optoelectron. Adv. Mater. 16(9–10), 1063–1070 (2014)
Haider, T.: A review of magneto-optic effects and its application. Int. J. Electromag. Appl. 7(1), 17–24 (2017)
Hasegawa, K., Miyazaki, Y.: Magneto-optic devices using interaction between magnetostatic surface wave and optical guided wave. Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 31, 230 (1992)
Hayek, M.: Constructing of exact solutions to the KdV and Burgers equations with power-law nonlinearity by the extended \((G^{\prime }/G)\)- expansion method. Appl. Math. Comput. 217(1), 212–221 (2010)
Kudryashov, N.A., Antonova, E.V.: Solitary waves of equation for propagation pulse with power nonlinearities. Optik. 217, 164881 (2020)
Kudryashov, N.A.: First integrals and general solution of the Fokas-Lenells equation. Optik. 195, 163135 (2019)
Kudryashov, N.A.: Mathematical model of propagation pulse in optical fiber with power nonlinearities. Optik. 212, 164750 (2020)
Kudryashov, N.A.: Method for finding highly dispersive optical solitons of nonlinear differential equations. Optik. 206, 163550 (2020)
Kudryashov, N.A.: Solitary waves of the generalized Sasa-Satsuma equation with arbitrary refractive index. Optik. 232, 166540 (2021)
Kudryashov, N.A.: Solitary waves of the non-local Schrödinger equation with arbitrary refractive index. Optik. 231, 166443 (2021)
Kudryashov, N.A.: First integrals and general solution of the traveling wave reduction for Schrödinger equation with anti-cubic nonlinearity. Optik 185, 665–671 (2019)
Kudryashov, N.A.: General solution of traveling wave reduction for the Kundu-Mukherjee-Naskar model. Optik 186, 22–27 (2019)
Kudryashov, N.A.: A generalized model for description of propagation pulses in optical fiber. Optik 189, 42–52 (2019)
Kudryashov, N.A.: Highly dispersive optical solitons of equation with various polynomial nonlinearity law. Chaos Solit. Fract. 140, 110202 (2020)
Kudryashov, N.A.: Periodic and solitary waves in optical fiber Bragg gratings with dispersive reflectivity. Chin. J. Phys. 66, 401–405 (2020)
Kudryashov, N.A.: Almost general solution of the reduced higher-order nonlinear Schrödinger equation. em Optik. 230, 166347 (2021)
Kudryashov, N.A., Safanova, D.V.: Painlevé analysis and traveling wave solutions of the fourth-order differential equation for pulse with non-local nonlinearity. Optik. 227, 166019 (2021)
Liu, X., Zhou, Q., Biswas, A., Alzahrani, A.K., Liu, W.: The similarities and differences of different plane solitons controlled by (3+ 1)-Dimensional coupled variable coefficient system. J. Adv. Res. 24, 167–173 (2020)
Liu, S., Zhou, Q., Biswas, A., Alzahrani, A.K., Liu, W.: Interactions among solitons for a fifth-order variable coefficient nonlinear Schrödinger equation. Nonlinear Dynam. 100(3), 2797–2805 (2020)
Merabti, A., Triki, H., Azzouzi, F., Zhou, Q., Biswas, A., Liu, W., Alzahrani, A.K., Abdessetar, E.A.: Propagation properties of chirped optical similaritons with dual-power law nonlinearity. Chaos Solit. Fract. 140, 110158 (2020)
Meradji, S., Triki, H., Zhou, Q., Biswas, A., Ekici, M., Liu, W.: Chirped self-similar cnoidal waves and similaritons in an inhomogeneous optical medium with resonant nonlinearity. Chaos Solit. Fract. 141, 110441 (2020)
Sassaroli, E., DiMarzio, C., He, Y., Oliver, S.: Magneto-optic Kerr effect in a slab waveguide. J. Appl. Phys. 90(12), 6054–6060 (2001)
Savescu, M., Bhrawy, A.H., Hilal, E.M., Alshaery, A.A., Biswas, A.: Optical solitons in magneto-optic waveguides with spatio-temporal dispersion. Frequenz 68(9–10), 445–451 (2014)
Shoji, Y., Mizumoto, T.: Waveguide magneto-optical devices for photonics integrated circuits. Opt. Mater. Exp. 8(8), 2387–2394 (2018)
Vega-Guzman, J., Biswas, A., Asma, M., Seadawy, A.R., Ekici, M., Alzahrani, A.K., Belic, M.R.: Optical soliton perturbation with parabolic- nonlocal combo nonlinearity: undetermined coefficients and semi-inverse variational principle’. J. Opt. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12596-020-00670-y
Višňovskỳ, Š, Yamaguchi, T., Pištora, J., Postava, K., Beauvillain, P., Veis, M.: Physics of magneto-optic waveguide isolator. Int. J. Microw. Opt. Technol. 1(2), 639–643 (2006)
Yan, Y., Liu, W., Zhou, Q., Biswas, A.: Dromion-like structures and periodic wave solutions for variable-coefficients complex cubic-quintic Ginzburg-Landau equation influenced by higher-order effects and nonlinear gain. Nonlinear Dynam. 99(2), 1313–1319 (2020)
Yildirim, Y., Biswas, A., Kara, A.H., Ekici, M., Zayed, E.M.E., Alzahrani, A.K., Belic, M.R.: “Optical solitons and conservation law with Kudryashov’s form of arbitrary refractive index”. J. Opt. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12596-021-00688-w
Yildirim, Y., Biswas, A., Triki, H., Ekici, M., Guggilla, P., Khan, S., Moraru, L., Belic, M.R. 2021 “Cubic–quartic optical soliton perturbation with Kudryashov’s law of refractive index having quadrupled power law and dual form of generalized nonlocal nonlinearity by sine–Gordon equation approach”. J. Opt. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12596-021-00686-y
Yildirim, Y., Biswas, A., Kara, A.H., Ekici, M., Alzahrani, A.K., Belic, M.R.: Cubic-quartic optical soliton perturbation and conservation laws with generalized Kudryashov’s form of refractive index. J. Opt. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12596-021-00681-3
Yildirim, Y., Topkara, E., Biswas, A., Triki, H., Ekici, M., Guggilla, P., Khan, S., Belic, M.R.: Cubic-quartic optical soliton perturbation with Lakshmanan-Porsezian-Daniel model by sine-Gordon equation approach. J. Opt. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12596-021-00685-z
Yu, W., Zhang, H., Zhou, Q., Biswas, A., Alzahrani, A.K., Liu, W.: The mixed interaction of localized, breather, exploding and solitary wave for the (3+ 1)-dimensional Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equation in fluid dynamics. Nonlinear Dynam. 100(2), 1611–1619 (2020)
Zayed, E.M., Alngar, M.E., El-Horbaty, M.M., Biswas, A., Kara, A.H., Ekici, M., Asma, M., Alzahrani, A.K., Belic, M.R.: Solitons and conservation laws in magneto-optic waveguides having parabolic-nonlocal law of refractive index. Phys. Lett. A. 384(31), 126814 (2020)
Zayed, E.M., Shohib, R.M., Alngar, M.E., Biswas, A., Asma, M., Ekici, M., Moshokoa, S.P., Alzahrani, A.K., Belic, M.R.: Solitons in magneto - optic waveguides with dual power law nonlinearity. Phys. Lett. A. 384(27), 126456 (2020)
Zayed, E.M., Shohib, R.M., El-Horbaty, M.M., Biswas, A., Asma, M., Ekici, M., Alzahrani, A.K., Belic, M.R.: Solitons in magneto-optic waveguides with quadratic-cubic nonlinearity. Phys Lett. A. 384(25), 126697 (2020)
Zayed, E.M.E., Alngar, M.E.M., Biswas, A., Kara, A.H., Moraru, L., Ekici, M., Alzahrani, A.K., Belic, M.R.: Solitons and conservation laws in magneto-optic waveguides with triple-power law nonlinearity. J. Opt. 49(4), 584–590 (2020)
Zayed, E.M., Alngar, M.E., Biswas, A., Asma, M., Ekici, M., Alzahrani, A.K., Belic, M.R.: Solitons in magneto-optic waveguides with Kudryashov’s law of refractive index. Chaos Solit. Fract. 140, 110129 (2020)
Zayed, E.M.E., Al-Nowehy, A.G., Alngar, M.E.M., Biswas, A., Asma, M., Ekici, M., Alzahrani, A.K., Belic, M.R.: Highly dispersive optical solitons in birefringent fibers with four nonlinear forms of using Kudryashov’s approach. J. Opt. 50, 120–131 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12596-020-00668-6
Zayed, E.M., Alngar, M.E., Biswas, A., Kara, A.H., Asma, M., Ekici, M., Khan, S., Alzahrani, A.K., Belic, M.R.: Solitons and conservation laws in magneto-optic waveguides with generalized Kudryashov’s equation. Chin. J. Phys. 69, 186–205 (2021)
Zayed, E.M., Alngar, M.E., El-Horbaty, M.M., Biswas, A., Ekici, M., Zhou, Q., Khan, S., Mallawi, F., Belic, M.R.: Highly dispersive optical solitons in the nonlinear Schrödinger equation having polynomial law of the refractive index change. Indian J. Phys. 95(1), 109–119 (2021)
Zhou, Q., Ekici, M., Sonmezoglu, A., Mirzazadeh, M.: Optical solitons with Biswas-Milovic equation by extended \((G^{\prime }/G)\)-expansion method. Optik 127(16), 6277–6290 (2016)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors also declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Koç, E., Ekici, M. & Biswas, A. Optical soliton perturbation in magneto-optic waveguides by extended \(G^{\prime }/G\)–expansion. Opt Quant Electron 53, 282 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-021-02925-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-021-02925-9