Abstract
This paper obtains cubic–quartic optical solitons of generalized Kudryashov’s law of refractive index. The included perturbation terms are with maximum intensity. The retrieved soliton solutions are with the aid of F-expansion, exp-expansion and Riccati equation methods. Finally, the conservation laws of the model are also recovered and listed.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
There are quite a few innovative concepts in optical solitons that have encapsulated the field of nonlinear optics [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. These ideas range from fiber Bragg gratings [5, 11] when chromatic dispersion runs low, highly dispersive optical solitons [7, 19], pure–cubic optical solitons [17], pure–quartic optical solitons [4], cubic–quartic (CQ) optical solitons [3, 6, 16], Kudryashov’s law of refractive index [9,10,11,12,13], generalized Kudryashov’s law of refractive index [8]. This paper is an infusion of two such concepts to formulate a model that is with CQ optical solitons modeled by generalized Kudryashov’s equation (GKE). In the past, CQ solitons with Kudryashov’s equation (KE) have been studied and its conservation laws have been reported as well [3]. This paper addresses CQ–GKE by the aid of three innovative integration schemes, and they are Riccati equation method, F-expansion scheme and the exp-expansion method. These algorithms retrieve bright, dark and singular soliton solutions as well as a couple of forms for combo optical solitons. The paper closes with a list of conserved quantities that are recovered. The details are enumerated in the rest of the paper, once the model is introduced with the inclusion of perturbation terms that are all of Hamiltonian type and appear with maximum intensity.
Governing model
The cubic–quartic generalized Kudryashov’s equation (CQ–GKE) with the perturbation terms is [3]:
In (1), the independent variables are spatial x and temporal t, while the dependent variable is \(q\left( x,t\right)\) that represents the complex valued wave profile. Next, a is the coefficient of third–order dispersion (3OD), b is the coefficient of fourth–order dispersion (4OD), and \(i=\sqrt{-1}\). The constants \(c_{j}\) for \(1\le j\le 8\) are the coefficient of nonlinearity effects. Then, \(\lambda\) represents self–steepening term, while \(\theta\) and \(\mu\) are the coefficients of higher–order dispersion and nonlinear dispersion. Finally, m represents maximum intensity and n is the power nonlinearity parameter which is in the range \(0<n<1/2.\) It must be noted that the parameter m is not unbounded. Its bounds are determined by Benjamin–Feir stability analysis and is a whole different project by itself which is on the bucket list for now.
Mathematical analysis
The starting point for decomposing the governing equation into real and imaginary parts is:
where
and v is the speed of the wave. From the phase component,
where \(\kappa\), \(\omega\), \(\zeta\) stand for the frequency, wave number and phase center, respectively. Insert (2) into (1). Real part yields
while imaginary part causes
Form Eq. (6), the constraint conditions are recovered as
and then the velocity is
So, the real part equation given by (5) turns into
By virtue of the transformation \(U=Q^{\frac{1}{n}}\), Eq. (10) changes to
The last equation will now be studied by three integration schemes in next subsections.
Application TO CQ–GKE
Riccati Equation Method
This methodology suggests the formal solution of Eq. (11) as
where N is the balance number, \(A_{i}\) for \(0\le i\le N\) are constants, and the function \(V(\xi )\) holds
with constants \(S_{2}\), \(S_{1}\) and \(S_{0}\). Also, it needs to be mentioned that Eq. (13) has the solutions as follows:
where \(\xi _{0}\) is a constant and \(\sigma =\) \(S_{1}^{2}-4S_{0}S_{2}\).
According to the balancing principle, the solution of Eq. (11) is
Then, putting (15) along with (13) into (11) yields
Plugging (16)–(24) with (14) into (15), the following soliton solutions to CQ–GKE are secured:
Dark soliton is
with
Singular soliton is
with
F-Expansion procedure
This innovative integration algorithm assumes that the formal solution of Eq. (11) is structured as below:
where N is the balance number, \(A_{i}\) for \(0\le i\le N\) are constants, and the function \(F(\xi )\) satisfies
with constants P, Q and R. Also, here, it should be noted that the solutions of Eq. (30) are:
Case | P | Q | R | \(F(\xi )\) | \(F(\xi ) \, (m\rightarrow 1)\) | \(F(\xi ) \, (m\rightarrow 0)\) | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | \(m^{2}\) | \(-(1+m^{2})\) | 1 | \({{\,\mathrm{sn}\,}}\xi\) | \(\tanh \xi\) | \(\sin \xi\) | (31) |
2 | 1 | \(-(1+m^{2})\) | \(m^{2}\) | \({{\,\mathrm{ns}\,}}\xi\) | \(\coth \xi\) | \(\csc \xi\) | |
3 | \(1-m^{2}\) | \(2-m^{2}\) | 1 | \(\text {sc} \, \xi\) | \(\sinh \xi\) | \(\tan \xi\) | |
4 | 1 | \(2-m^{2}\) | \(1-m^{2}\) | \({{\,\mathrm{cs}\,}}\xi\) | \({{\,\mathrm{csch}\,}}\xi\) | \(\cot \xi\) | |
5 | \(-m^{2}\) | \(2m^{2}-1\) | \(1-m^{2}\) | \({{\,\mathrm{cn}\,}}\xi\) | \({{\,\mathrm{sech}\,}}\xi\) | \(\cos \xi\) | |
6 | 1 | \(2m^{2}-1\) | \(-m^{2}\left( 1-m^{2}\right)\) | \({{\,\mathrm{ds}\,}}\xi\) | \({{\,\mathrm{csch}\,}}\xi\) | \(\csc \xi\) | |
7 | \(1-m^{2}\) | \(2m^{2}-1\) | \(-m^{2}\) | \({{\,\mathrm{nc}\,}}\xi\) | \(\cosh \xi\) | \(\sec \xi\) | |
8 | 1 | \(-(1+m^{2})\) | \(m^{2}\) | \({{\,\mathrm{ns}\,}}\xi\) | \(\coth \xi\) | \(\csc \xi\) | |
9 | \(\frac{1}{4}\) | \(\frac{m^{2}-2}{2}\) | \(\frac{m^{2}}{4}\) | \({{\,\mathrm{ns}\,}}\xi \pm {{\,\mathrm{ds}\,}}\xi\) | \(\coth \xi \pm {{\,\mathrm{csch}\,}}\xi\) | \(2\csc \xi\) | |
10 | \(\frac{m^{2}}{4}\) | \(\frac{m^{2}-2}{2}\) | \(\frac{m^{2}}{4}\) | \({{\,\mathrm{sn}\,}}\xi \pm i {{\,\mathrm{cn}\,}}\xi\) | \(\tanh \xi \pm i {{\,\mathrm{sech}\,}}\xi\) | \(\sin \xi \pm i \cos \xi\) | |
11 | \(\frac{1}{4}\) | \(\frac{1-2m^{2}}{2}\) | \(\frac{1}{4}\) | \({{\,\mathrm{ns}\,}}\xi \pm {{\,\mathrm{cs}\,}}\xi\) | \(\coth \xi \pm {{\,\mathrm{csch}\,}}\xi\) | \(\csc \xi \pm \cot \xi\) | |
12 | \(\frac{1-m^{2}}{4}\) | \(\frac{1+m^{2}}{2}\) | \(\frac{1-m^{2}}{4}\) | \({{\,\mathrm{nc}\,}}\xi \pm \text {sc} \, \xi\) | \(\cosh \xi \pm \sinh \xi\) | \(\sec \xi \pm \tan \xi\) |
According to the balancing principle, the solution of Eq. (11) takes the form of
Plugging (32) with (30) into (11) leads to
As a consequence, inserting (33)–(41) along with (31) into (32), soliton solutions to the model are revealed as:
Dark soliton is
Singular soliton is
Bright soliton is
Singular soliton is
Combo singular soliton is
Exp-expansion method
The solution of Eq. (11) according to this form of integration norm is taken to be:
where N is the balance number, \(A_{i}\) for \(0\le i\le N\) are constants, and the function \(V(\xi )\) ensures
with constants S and R. Also, it should be remarked that Eq. (48) has the solutions
where \(\xi _{0}\) constant and \(\sigma =R^{2}-4S\).
From the balancing principle, Eq. (11) has the solution form given by
Inserting (50) with (48) into (11), the following results are obtained:
Plugging (51)–(59) along with (49) into (50), the solutions for (1) are discovered as:
Singular soliton is
with
Dark soliton is
with
A surface plot of a bright soliton is given here (Fig. 1).
Conservation laws
In the complex system (1) above, we let \(q=u+iw\) to obtain a system two pdes whose conserved flows \((T^t,T^x)\) are established employing the multiplier approach. It turns out that a single multiplier \(M=(-u,v)\) giving rise to the ‘power’ conserved density
so that a corresponding conserved density for (1) is
Also, if \(\lambda =-\theta\), we have linear momentum and Hamiltonian conservation too. Then following conserved density, \(T_2^t\), for linear momentum is
and the ‘momentum density’ for (1) is
The conserved density corresponding to ‘Hamiltonian’, \(\mathcal{T}^t_3\), is rather lengthy and the calculation for the conserved quantity would be meaningless; we will not produce it here.
Noting that bright soliton solution to (1) is of the form:
where A is the amplitude and B is its inverse width, the two conserved quantities, power (P) and linear momentum (M), respectively, are
and
Conclusions
This paper obtained CQ optical soliton solutions to GKE by utilizing three forms of integration norms. A wide range of soliton solutions are secured. The conservation laws are finally identified for the model. These con laws will be of great value to probe into the model further along. One immediate area to extend this study is to consider soliton perturbation theory, both deterministic and stochastic. Thus, one can study soliton cooling effect and the effect of stochastic perturbation by addressing the corresponding Langevin equations. Another avenue of obvious extension is to take a look at the aspect of modeling CQ–GKE with Bragg gratings and in birefringent fibers as well as DWDM/UDWDM networking. Additional, and yet powerful, mathematical tools such as Lie symmetry and others are going to be implemented in future as applied earlier in several other areas of physics [21,22,23,24,25]. These would lead to several avenues of research. Such studies are under way, and the results are going to be visible sooner than later.
References
A. Biswas, Optical soliton cooling with polynomial law of nonlinear refractive index. J. Opt. 49(4), 580–583 (2020)
A. Biswas, P. Guggilla, S. Khan, L. Mullick, L. Moraru, M. Ekici, A.K. Alzahrani, M.R. Belic, Optical soliton perturbation with Kudryashov’s equation by semi-inverse variational principle. Phys. Lett. A 384(33), 126830 (2020)
A. Biswas, A. Sonmezoglu, M. Ekici, A.H. Kara, A.K. Alzahrani, M.R. Belic, Cubic–quartic optical solitons and conservation laws with Kudryashov’s law of refractive index by extended trial function. Comput. Math. Math. Phys. (to appear)
A. Blanco-Redondo, C.M. Sterke, J.E. Sipe, T.F. Krauss, B.J. Eggleton, C. Husko, Pure-quartic solitons. Nat. Commun. 7, 10427 (2016)
A. Darwish, E.A. El-Dahab, H. Ahmed, A.H. Arnous, M.S. Ahmed, A. Biswas, P. Guggilla, Y. Yildirim, F. Mallawi, M.R. Belic, Optical solitons in fiber Bragg gratings via modified simple equation. Optik 203, 163886 (2020)
G. Genc, M. Ekici, A. Biswas, M.R. Belic, Cubic-quartic optical solitons with Kudryashov’s law of refractive index by \(F\)-expansion schemes. Results Phys. 18, 103273 (2020)
O. Gonzalez-Gaxiola, A. Biswas, M. Ekici, S. Khan, Highly dispersive optical solitons with quadratic–cubic law of refractive index by the variational iteration method. J. Opt. (to appear)
N.A. Kudryashov, A generalized model for description of propagation pulses in optical fiber. Optik 189, 42–52 (2019)
N.A. Kudryashov, The Painleve approach for finding solitary wave solutions of nonlinear nonintegrable differential equations. Optik 183, 642–649 (2019)
N.A. Kudryashov, Solitary and periodic waves of the hierarchy for propagation pulse in optical fiber. Optik 194, 163060 (2019)
N.A. Kudryasahov, Periodic and solitary waves in optical fiber Bragg gratings with dispersive reflectivity. Chin. J. Phys. 66, 401–405 (2020)
N.A. Kudryashov, First integrals and general solution of the complex Ginzburg–Landau equation. Appl. Math. Comput. 386, 125407 (2020)
N.A. Kudryashov, Optical solitons of mathematical model with arbitrary refractive index. Optik 224, 165391 (2020)
W.Y. Liu, Y.J. Yu, L.D. Chen, Variational principles for Ginzburg-Landau equation by He’s semi-inverse method. Chaos Solitons Fractals 33(5), 1801–1803 (2007)
J. Vega–Guzman, A. Biswas, M. Asma, A.R. Seadawy, M. Ekici, A.K. Alzahrani, M.R. Belic, Optical soliton perturbation with parabolic-nonlocal combo nonlinearity: undetermined coefficients and semi-inverse variational principle. J. Opt. (to appear)
Y. Yildirim, A. Biswas, A.J.M. Jawad, M. Ekici, Q. Zhou, S. Khan, A.K. Alzahrani, M.R. Belic, Cubic–quartic optical solitons in birefringent fibers with four forms of nonlinear refractive index by exp-function expansion. Results Phys. 16, 102913 (2020)
Y. Yildirim, A. Biswas, M. Asma, P. Guggilla, S. Khan, M. Ekici, A.K. Alzahrani, M.R. Belic, Pure-cubic optical soliton perturbation with full nonlinearity. Optik 222, 165394 (2020)
E.M.E. Zayed, M.E.M. Alngar, A. Biswas, A.H. Kara, L. Moraru, M. Ekici, A.K. Alzahrani, M.R. Belic, Solitons and conservation laws in magneto-optic waveguides with triple power law nonlinearity. J. Opt. 49(4), 584–590 (2020)
E.M.E. Zayed, A.G. Al-Nowehy, M.E.M. Alngar, A. Biswas, M. Asma, M. Ekici, A.K. Alzahrani, M.R. Belic, Highly dispersive optical solitons in birefringent fibers with four nonlinear forms using Kudryashov’s approach. J. Opt. (to appear)
E.M.E. Zayed, R.M.A. Shohib, M.E.M. Alngar, A. Biswas, M. Ekici, S. Khan, A.K. Alzahrani, M.R. Belic, Optical solitons and conservation laws associated with Kudryashov's sextic power-law nonlinearity of refractive index. Ukr. J. Phys. Opt. 22(1), 38–49 (2021)
G. Wang, Symmetry analysis and rogue wave solutions for the \((2+1)\)-dimensional nonlinear Schrödinger equation with variable coefficients. Appl. Math. Lett. 56, 56–64 (2016)
G. Wang, A.H. Kara, A \((2+1)\)-dimensional KdV equation and mKdV equation: Symmetries, group invariant solutions and conservation laws. Phys. Lett. A 383(8), 728–731 (2019)
G. Wang, K. Yang, H. Gu, F. Guan, A.H. Kara, A \((2+1)\)-dimensional sine-Gordon and sinh-Gordon equations with symmetries and kink wave solutions. Nucl. Phys. B 953, 114956 (2020)
G. Wang, Y. Liu, Y. Wu, X. Su, Symmetry analysis for a seventh-order generalized KdV equation and its fractional version in fluid mechanics. Fractals 28(03), 2050044 (2020)
G. Wang, A novel \((3+1)\)-dimensional sine-Gorden and a sinh-Gorden equation: derivation, symmetries and conservation laws. Appl. Math. Lett. 113, 106768 (2021)
Acknowledgements
The research work of the sixth author (MRB) was supported by the grant NPRP 11S-1246-170033 from QNRF and he is thankful for it.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors also declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yıldırım, Y., Biswas, A., Kara, A.H. et al. Cubic–quartic optical soliton perturbation and conservation laws with generalized Kudryashov’s form of refractive index. J Opt 50, 354–360 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12596-021-00681-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12596-021-00681-3