Abstract
Sex-specific chemical secretions have been widely used as diagnostic characters in chemotaxonomy. The taxonomically confused group of bumblebees has reaped the benefit of this approach through the analyses of cephalic labial gland secretions (CLGS). Most of currently available CLGS descriptions concern species from the West-Palearctic region but few from the New World. Here, the CLGS of four East-Palearctic species Bombus deuteronymus, B. filchnerae, B. humilis, and B. exil (subgenus Thoracobombus) are analysed. Our results show high levels of variability in the major compounds in B. exil. In contrast, we describe a low differentiation in CLGS compounds between B. filchnerae and its phylogenetically closely related taxon B. muscorum. Moreover, the chemical profiles of B. filchnerae and B. muscorum are characterized by low concentrations of the C16 component, which is found in higher concentrations in the other Thoracobombus species. This raises the possibility that courtship behavior as well as environmental constraints could affect the role of the bumblebee males’ CLGS.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
In many animal species, sex-specific chemical secretions are involved in pre-mating communication (Hay 2011; Lecocq et al. 2015a; Patricelli et al. 2003). This key role in reproductive behavior has led to the development of chemotaxonomy in which such chemical traits are used as diagnostic characters to assess taxonomic status (Bagnères et al. 2003; Pokorny et al. 2014; Quicke 1993). The systematics of insects has especially reaped the benefits of this approach (Lockey 1991). Bumblebees (Hymenoptera, Apidae) give a stunning example of the improvements conferred by chemotaxonomy (Bertsch and Schweer 2011; Lecocq et al. 2015b). In this taxonomically confused group, morphological traits are often inefficient diagnostic characters because different species can be morphologically highly similar while conspecific populations can be very divergent in their coat color pattern (Lecocq et al. 2015b; Michener 1990; Williams 1998). In contrast, the male cephalic labial gland secretions (CLGS) are known to be species-specific semiochemicals (Ayasse and Jarau 2014; Calam 1969). These secretions are produced de novo (Luxová et al. 2003; Žáček et al. 2013) and attract conspecific virgin females (Ayasse and Jarau 2014). They appear to provide efficient diagnostic characters for species delimitation (Bergström et al. 1981; Lecocq et al. 2015c; Rasmont et al. 2005; Svensson and Bergström 1979; Terzo et al. 2003).
During recent decades, an increasing number of studies have based their taxonomic conclusions on inter-taxon comparisons of CLGS composition (e.g. Bertsch and Schweer 2011; Lecocq et al. 2015b, d). However, global taxonomic assessment of bumblebee species through chemotaxonomy requires an extensive overview of CLGS composition. Currently, CLGS composition has been described for approximately 65 species (Ayasse and Jarau 2014; Brasero et al. 2015; Lecocq et al. 2015c, d; Rasmont et al. 2005; Terzo et al. 2003; Terzo et al. 2007) out of a total of 250 bumblebee species around the world (Williams 1998).
Most of currently available CLGS descriptions concern species from the West-Palearctic region (Calam 1969; Lecocq et al. 2015b; Rasmont et al. 2005) and some from the New World (Bertsch et al. 2004, 2008; Brasero et al. 2015). In contrast, bumblebee fauna from the East-Palearctic region has received far less attention to date (Bergström et al. 1981), even though this area hosts the main bumblebee diversity hotspot (Williams 1998).
Beyond taxonomic matters, more and more ecological questions about the role of compounds emitted by bumblebees have emerged within the scientific community (e.g. Brasero et al. 2017; Lhomme et al. 2015). However, compared to several neural coding studies focused on sex pheromones in honey bees (e.g. Carcaud et al. 2015; Galizia and Menzel 2001; Sandoz 2012), only a few studies have begun to describe the neurophysiology of olfaction in bumblebees (Fonta and Masson 1984; Strube-Bloss et al. 2015). The description of CLGS contents in bumblebees could help achieve a better understanding of these insects’ sexual communication behavior and its neurobiological basis.
In this study, the variability in CLGS of four East-Palearctic taxa was investigated to question their role in the pre-mating recognition system: Bombus deuteronymus superequester (Skorikov 1914) (Fig. 1a), B. filchnerae Vogt 1908 (Fig. 1b), B. humilis subbaicalensis Vogt 1911 (Fig. 1c), and B. exil (Skorikov 1923) (Fig. 1d) all belonging to the Thoracobombus Dalla Torre 1880 subgenus. Moreover, we compared the CLGS composition of B. filchnerae with that of its nearest Palearctic taxon: B. muscorum (L. 1758) (Fig. 1e, f).
Methods and Materials
Sampling
One hundred and forty seven queens of B. deuteronymus superequester (n = 2), B. exil (n = 65), B. filchnerae (n = 77) and B. humilis subbaicalensis (n = 3) were collected in Mongolia in 2014. One hundred and twenty two queens were killed during collection and 25 were transported alive and reared in Belgium (Table 1). In order to produce males, we maintained queens in a wooden box in a controlled climate, dark room at 26/30 °C and 50–60% relative humidity, and fed them ad libitum on Salix sp. pollen and sugar syrup (Lhomme et al. 2013). Ten different queens produced 51 males (see Table 1): B. deuteronymus superequester (n = 10), B. exil (n = 13), B. filchnerae (n = 15), and B. humilis subbaicalensis (n = 13). All breeding males used in the analysis were between 7 and 10 days old, which corresponds to the age of active males (Tasei et al. 1998). In order to compare the CLGS compositions of B. filchnerae, we used its phylogenetic sister taxon B. muscorum (n = 24) whose composition has been described by Lecocq et al. (2015d) (Table 1). We assessed the taxonomic identification of males using the taxonomical revision of North China bumblebees published by An et al. (2014). Indeed, a taxonomical revision can merge different lines of evidence such as morphological approaches, DNA-based methods, and semio-chemical signatures in order to build a consensus and clarify taxonomic status. Prior to chemical analyses, all males were killed by freezing at −20 °C and their CLGS were extracted in 400 μl hexane (De Meulemeester et al. 2011). Samples were stored at −40 °C.
Chemical Analyses
We determined the chemical composition of CLGS by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC/MS) using a Focus GC (Thermo Scientific) with a non-polar DB-5 ms capillary column [5% phenyl (methyl) polysiloxane stationary phase; column length 30 m; inner diameter 0.25 mm; film thickness 0.25 μm] coupled to a DSQ II quadrupol mass analyzer (Thermo Scientific) with 70 eV electron ionization. We used a splitless injection mode (220 °C) and helium as the carrier gas (1 ml/min). The temperature of the oven was set to 70 °C for 2 mins and then heated up at a rate of 10 °C/min to 320 °C. The temperature was then held at 320 °C for 5 mins. Compounds were identified in Xcalibur™ using the retention times (tr) and mass spectra of each peak, compared with those in the National Institute of Standards and Technology library (NIST, U.S.A). Double bond positions (C = C) were determined by dimethyl disulfide (DMDS) derivatization (Cvacka et al. 2008).
We quantified all samples using a gas chromatograph-flame ionization detector Shimadzu GC-2010 with a SLB-5 ms non-polar capillary column (5% phenyl (methyl) polysiloxane stationary phase; 30-m column length; 0.25-mm inner diameter; 0.25-μm film thickness) with the same chromatographic conditions as used for the GC/MS. Peak areas of compounds were detected in GCsolution Postrun (Shimadzu Corporation) with automatic peak detection and noise measurement. We calculated relative amounts (RA in %) of compounds in each sample by dividing the peak areas of compounds by the total area of compounds in each sample. We discarded all compounds for which RA were lower than 0.1% for all specimens (De Meulemeester et al. 2011). Moreover, all compounds having an RA equal to or greater than 1% were considered to be abundant compounds. We defined the data matrix as the alignment of each compound between all samples performed with GCAligner 1.0 (Dellicour and Lecocq 2013a, b) (see supplementary file 1).
Statistical Analyses
Statistical analyses were performed using R (R Development Core Team 2017) to detect differences in CLGS between taxa. Data consisting of the relative contents of all compounds were standardized (mean = 0, standard deviation = 1), to reduce the sample-concentration effect (Brasero et al. 2015).
A clustering method was used to assess potential differentiation between taxa. A Pearson correlation matrix based on CLGS data matrix was computed. An unweighted pair group method with arithmetic mean (UPGMA) was used as a clustering method (R-package ape, Suzuki and Shimodaira 2011). We assessed the uncertainty in hierarchical cluster analysis using P-values calculated via multiscale bootstrap resampling with 50,000 bootstrap replications (R-package pvclust; Suzuki and Shimodaira 2011). We investigated differentiation among CLGS by performing a multiple response permutation procedure (MRPP) (R package vegan, Oksanen et al. 2017).
For each taxon, we used the indicator value (IndVal) method to identify specific compounds (indicator compounds, IC) (Claudet et al. 2006; Dufrêne and Legendre 1997). The given value is the product of the relative abundance and relative frequency of occurrence of a compound within a group. The statistical significance of an indicator compound (threshold of 0.01) was evaluated with a randomization procedure (Dufrêne and Legendre 1997).
In order to visualize the indicator compounds, we compared B. filchnerae and its sister species B. muscorum by principal component analyses (PCA; R-package MASS; Venables and Ripley 2002).
Results
One hundred and twenty nine compounds were detected in the CLGS across all species: 36 in B. deuteronymus superequester, 70 in B. exil, 33 in B. filchnerae, 35 in B. muscorum and 42 in B. humilis (Supplementary file 1). The main compounds detected were (i) for B. deuteronymus superequester: octadec-11-en-1-ol (44.40% - 57.05%); (ii) for B. exil: hexadec-9-enal (0.04% - 44.35%), octadec-9-enoic acid (1.36% - 15.20%), icos-11-en-1-ol (0.20% - 8.88%) and hexadecenyl hexadecenoate (0.69% - 10.53%); (iii) for B. filchnerae and B. muscorum: octadec-9-enyl acetate (40.49% - 75.96%) and (iv) for B. humilis subbaicalensis: octadec-9-en-1-ol (40.12% - 56.64%) (Table 2; Supplementary file 1). Our chemical analyses showed qualitative differentiation among all taxa including specific major compounds (i.e. compounds that have the highest relative abundance among all CLGS compounds in at least one individual of the taxon), except between B. filchnerae and B. muscorum (Table 2) where only minor compounds diverged, allowing us to differentiate the two taxa (Table 3).
Our statistical analyses confirmed the differentiations of our samples in five groups supported by high multiscale bootstrap resampling values: (i) B. exil, (ii) B. humilis subbaicalensis, (iii) B. deuteronymus superequester, (iv) B. filchnerae, and (v) B. muscorum (Fig. 2a, b). Moreover, MRPP confirmed these divisions (all P-values <0.001): B. deuteronymus vs B. exil (A = 0.2993); B. deuteronymus vs B. filchnerae (A = 0.3326); B. deuteronymus vs B. humilis (A = 0.3868); B. deuteronymus vs B. muscorum (A = 0.2551); B. exil vs B. filchnerae (A = 0.2876); B. exil vs B. humilis (A = 0.3059); B. exil vs B. muscorum (A = 0.2501); B. filchnerae vs B. humilis (A = 0.3547); B. filchnerae vs B. muscorum (A = 0.186), and B. humilis vs B. muscorum (A = 0.2648). Several significant indicator compounds were revealed by the IndVal method (IndVal >0.70) (Supplementary file 1).
Discussion
The chemical characterization of CLGS from four East-Palearctic species (B. deuteronymus, B. filchnerae, B. humilis, and B. exil) was performed. Our results highlight the high levels of variability in the main compounds of CLGS from B. exil. In contrast, we found low levels of discrimination in CLGS compounds between B. filchnerae and its closely related taxon B. muscorum. Moreover, the chemical profiles of B. filchnerae and B. muscorum are characterized by a lack of highly concentrated C16 components, whereas these components are abundant in the other Thoracobombus species. The analyses of CLGS from B. humilis subbaicalensis and B. deuteronymus superequester allowed us to highlight the species-specificity of their contents.
The intraspecific variability of main compounds in Bombus exil. Bombus exil is characterized by high levels of intraspecific variability in its CLGS composition (Supplementary file 1). It displays four main components (Table 2) and 45 indicator compounds (Supplementary file 1). We therefore hypothesize that pre-mating communication in B. exil involves other cues, leading to a relaxation of selective pressure on CLGS chemistry, and thus to an increase of intraspecific variability (Lecocq et al. 2013). Indeed, males of B. exil are the only bumblebees to have the last three articles of their antennae broadened and ventrally concave (Tkalců 1974) (Fig. 1d). During copulation they press this clubbed part of the antennae against the lower part of the face of female bees (P. Williams: com. pers. based on unpublished personal observations from Moerdaga, Neimenggu, 18/08/2009). A relatively similar behavior has been reported in grasshoppers bearing clubbed antennae where they are used to reinforce the visual signal associated with the hind leg strokes (Dumas et al. 2010), and in other species where movement of the antennae is used as a visual display even if their antennae are not clubbed (Dumas et al. 2010), suggesting that the apical thickening of the antennae has another key role. In some other Apoids, this kind of behavior has also been highlighted both with and without contact with females (Djegham et al. 1994; Felicioli 1998; Romani et al. 2003). Thereby, these modified antennae deserve more chemical and functional morphology studies as well as histological research dealing particularly with the concave area on the last article (Felicioli 1998; Yin et al. 2013).
Bombus filchnerae and B. muscorum differentiation. As mentioned in Terzo et al. (2005) for B. ruderarius, abundant compounds may be absent within the same taxon (i.e. for B. filchnerae; Table 2). Reproductive traits are shaped by selective pressure to maximize encounter rates between conspecific mates (Wyatt 2003) resulting in isolation between heterospecific individuals (Paterson 1993; Symonds et al. 2009). Such selective pressure most likely leads to the strong species-specificity of CLGS (Lecocq et al. 2011; Lecocq et al. 2015d). This species-specificity has been highlighted in all studied bumblebee taxa (Svensson and Bergström 1977; Žáček et al. 2009). Nevertheless, some intraspecific differences related to age or geography occur (e.g. Lecocq et al. 2015a, d), while remaining lower than interspecific differentiation (Martinet et al. 2017). Low CLGS differentiation is observed between B. muscorum and B. filchnerae (Supplementary file 1; Tables 2 and 3; Fig. 2a, b). Such a low CLGS differentiation pattern could be explained by (i) the conspecificity of the two taxa (i.e. they are the same species) or (ii) the minor role of CLGS in pre-mating communication relaxing selective pressure on species-specificity. The strong morphological differentiation (i.e. genitalia) (Williams 1998) of the two taxa and their genetic isolation (Cameron et al. 2007; Lecocq et al. 2015d) suggests their heterospecificity, which supports the latter hypothesis. In both B. muscorum and B. filchnerae, the CLGS include only very low concentrations of the C16 compound and no compounds with shorter carbon chains (Supplementary file 1). Since alkanes with more than 16 carbon atoms are not volatile at a temperature of 20 °C (Cicolella 2008), the CLGS of B. muscorum and B. filchnerae could not be involved in long distance intersex attraction but rather could play a role at a short distance. Aggregations of B. muscorum males in close proximity to mature nest entrances waiting to mate with virgin queens have been reported (Darvill et al. 2007; Krüger 1951). This suggests that the long distance pre-mating recognition could be mediated by cues other than the CLGS, such as nest site choice (i.e. the habitat) or nest scent. Therefore, we advocate that CLGS play a minor role in pre-mating recognition of B. muscorum and B. filchnerae. Further studies on the pre-mating recognition of bumblebee species are needed to assess this hypothesis.
In the other Thoracobombus studied here (B. exil, B. deuteronymus superequester and B. humilis subbaicalensis) we found a high concentration of the C16 compound and other lighter compounds (Supplementary file 1). These have also been described in other Thoracobombus (Brasero et al. 2017; Lecocq et al. 2015b; Terzo et al. 2005) and other bumblebee subgenera (Ayasse and Jarau 2014; Lecocq et al. 2015c, d; Rasmont et al. 2005; Terzo et al. 2003). Indeed, we find no values greater than 2.15% for a C16 component in B. muscorum and B. filchnerae, whereas values such as 42.88%, 44.35% and 36.10% were found in B. deuteronymus superequester, B. exil, and B. humilis subbaicalensis, respectively (Supplementary file 1).
This suggests that the CLGS of B. exil, B. deuteronymus superequester and B. humilis subbaicalensis play the same role in their specific mate recognition systems (Paterson 1993) as in most other bumblebees.
B. humilis subbaicalensis and B. deuteronymus superequester differentiation. Based on main and abundant compounds (Table 1), our CLGS analyses demonstrate clear differentiation between B. humilis subbaicalensis and B. deuteronymus superequester (Fig. 2a). This differentiation is also observed in genetic markers between these two species (Cameron et al. 2007).
The Role of Minor Compounds
While most authors only take into account the major compounds in their discussion, our results show that between B. filchnerae and B. muscorum, differences in their CLGS are specified by minor compounds. This observation questions the role of these minor compounds in bumblebee olfaction. From this perspective, research on the neuronal processes induced by odorant information in the bumblebee brain would provide initial insights.
Indeed, several neural coding studies in Hymenoptera have shown the capacity of their olfactory system to both grant special properties to mixtures of pheromonal components and recognize individual components (Carcaud et al. 2015; Galizia and Menzel 2001; Sandoz 2012). In social insects, species use a wide range of different components which induce a simultaneous activation of several classes of olfactory receptor neurons (Sandoz et al. 2007). In honey bees, most of the results were obtained using volatile hydrocarbons that differ in carbon chain length (C5-C10) and functional groups (Carcaud et al. 2012; Sachse et al. 1999). However, some studies have addressed the effect of temperature on neural responses to odorants of low volatility (Carcaud et al. 2015) and indicated that brood and queen compounds (C10 to C20) were detected only at hive temperatures, i.e. around 35 °C (Brill et al. 2013; Carcaud et al. 2015).
Since environmental conditions appear to influence the neuronal response to odorants (Carcaud et al. 2015), it is difficult to identify which compounds emitted from the CLGS of males induce neuronal responses under natural conditions in bumblebees (in or out of the nest). In vivo calcium imaging (Carcaud et al. 2012) or electrophysiological recordings (Strube-Bloss et al. 2015), tested in similar conditions as in the wild (temperature and humidity), would mark a great first step towards a deeper understanding of the biological relevance of the messages emitted by males by observing what are and what are not detected and then responded to by females.
References
An J, Huang J, Shao Y, Zhang S, Wang B, Liu X, Wu J, Williams PH (2014) The bumblebees of North China (Apidae, Bombus Latreille). Zootaxa 3880:001–089
Ayasse M, Jarau S (2014) Chemical ecology of bumble bees. Annu Rev Entomol 59:299–319
Bagnères AG, Uva P, Clément JL (2003) Description d’une nouvelle espèce de Termite: Reticulitermes urbis n.sp. (Isopt., Rhinotermitidae). Bull Soc Entomol Fr 108:433–435
Bergström G, Svensson BG, Appelgren M, Groth I (1981) Complexity of bumble bee marking pheromones: biochemical, ecological and systematical interpretations. SystAss special vo:175–183
Bertsch A, Schweer H (2011) Labial gland marking secretions of male Bombus lucorum bumblebees from Europe and China reveal two separate species: B. lucorum (Linnaeus 1761) and Bombus minshanicola (Bischoff 1936). Biochem Syst Ecol 39:587–593
Bertsch A, Schweer H, Titze A (2004) Analysis of the labial gland secretions of the male bumblebee Bombus griseocollis (hymenoptera: Apidae). Z Naturforsch - section C J Biosci 59:701–707
Bertsch A, Schweer H, Titze A (2008) Chemistry of the cephalic labial gland secretions of male Bombus morrisoni and B. rufocinctus, two north American bumblebee males with perching behavior. J Chem Ecol 34:1268–1274
Brasero N, Martinet B, Urbanová K, Valterová I, Torres A, Hoffmann W, Rasmont P, Lecocq T (2015) First chemical analysis and characterization of the male species-specific cephalic labial-gland secretions of south American bumblebees. Chem Biodivers 12:1535–1546
Brasero N, Martinet B, Lecocq T, Lhomme P, Biella P, Valterova I, Urbanova K, Cornalba M, Hines H, Rasmont P (2017) The cephalic labial gland secretions of two socially parasitic bumblebees Bombus hyperboreus (Alpinobombus) and Bombus inexspectatus (Thoracobombus) question their inquiline strategy. Insect Sci 00:1–12
Brill MF, Rosenbaum T, Reus I, Kleineidam CJ, Nawrot MP, Rössler W (2013) Parallel processing via a dual olfactory pathway in the honeybee. J Neurosci 33:2443–2456
Calam DH (1969) Species and sex-specific compounds from the heads of male bumblebees (Bombus spp.) Nature 221:856–857
Cameron SA, Hines HM, Williams PH (2007) A comprehensive phylogeny of the bumble bees (Bombus). Biol J Linnean Soc 91:161–188
Carcaud J, Hill T, Guirfa M, Sandoz J-C (2012) Differential coding by two olfactory subsystems in the honeybee brain. J Neurophysiol 108:1106–1121
Carcaud J, Giurfa M, Sandoz J-C (2015) Differential combinatorial coding of pheromones in two olfactory subsystems of the honey bee brain. J Neurosci 35:4157–4167
Cicolella A (2008) Les composés organiques volatils (COV): définition, classification et propriétés. Rev Mal Respir 25:155–163
Claudet J, Pelletier D, Jouvenel JY, Bachet F, Galzin R (2006) Assessing the effects of marine protected area (MPA) on a reef fish assemblage in a northwestern Mediterranean marine reserve: identifying community-based indicators. Biol Conserv 130:349–369
Cvacka J, Kofronová E, Vasícková S, Stránský K, Jiros P, Hovorka O, Kindl J, Valterová I (2008) Unusual fatty acids in the fat body of the early nesting bumblebee, Bombus pratorum. Lipids 43:441–450
Dalla Torre KW (1880) Unsere Hummel-(Bombus) Arten. Die Naturhistoriker 30:40–41
Darvill B, Lye GC, Goulson D (2007) Aggregations of male Bombus muscorum (hymenoptera: Apidae) at mature nest. Incestuous brothers or amorous suitors? Apidologie 38:518–524
De Meulemeester T, Gerbaux P, Boulvin M, Coppée A, Rasmont P (2011) A simplified protocol for bumble bee species identification by cephalic secretion analysis. Insect Soc 58:227–236
Dellicour S, Lecocq T (2013a) GCALIGNER 1.0 and GCKOVATS 1.0 - manual of a software suite to compute a multiple sample comparison data matrix from eco-chemical datasets obtained by gas chromatography. University of Mons, Mons
Dellicour S, Lecocq T (2013b) GCALIGNER 1.0: a aligment program to compute a multiple sample comparison data matrix from large eco-chemical datasets obtained by gas chromatography. J Sep Sci 36:3206–3209
Djegham Y, Verhaeghe JC, Rasmont P (1994) Copulation of Bombus terrestris L. (hymenoptera: Apidae) in captivity. J Apic Res 33:15–20
Dufrêne M, Legendre P (1997) Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol Monogr 67:345–366
Dumas P, Tetreau G, Petit D (2010) Why certain male grasshoppers have clubbed antennae? C R Biol 335(5):429–437
Felicioli A (1998) Ethological and morphological analysis of mating behaviour in Osmia cornuta Latr. (hymenoptera, Megachilidae). Ins. Soc. Life 2:137–144
Fonta C, Masson C (1984) Comparative study by electrophysiology of olfactory responses in bumblebees (Bombus hypnorum and Bombus terrestris). J Chem Ecol 10:1157–1168
Galizia CG, Menzel R (2001) The role of glomeruli in the neural representation of odours: results from optical recording studies. J Insect Physiol 47:115–130
Hay ME (2011) Crustaceans as powerful models in aquatic chemical ecology. In: Thiel TB and M (ed) chemical communication in crustaceans. Springer, New York, pp 41–62
Krüger E (1951) Über die Bahnflüge der Männchen der Gattungen Bombus und Psithyrus. Z Tierpsychol 8:61–75
Lecocq T, Lhomme P, Michez D, Dellicour S, Valterová I, Rasmont P (2011) Molecular and chemical characters to evaluate species status of two cuckoo bumblebees: Bombus barbutellus and Bombus maxillosus (hymenoptera, Apidae, Bombini). Syst Entomol 36:453–469
Lecocq T, Vereecken NJ, Michez D, Dellicour S, Lhomme P, Valterová I, Rasplus J-Y, Rasmont P (2013) Patterns of genetic and reproductive traits differentiation in mainland vs. Corsican populations of bumblebees. PLoS One 8:e65642
Lecocq T, Coppée A, Mathy T, Lhomme P, Cammaerts-Tricot MC, Urbanová K, Valterová I, Rasmont P (2015a) Subspecific differentiation in male reproductive traits and virgin queen preferences, in Bombus terrestris. Apidologie 26:595–605
Lecocq L, Brasero N, Martinet B, Valterova I, Rasmont P (2015b) Highly polytypic taxon complex: interspecific and intraspecific integrative taxonomic assessment of the widespread pollinator Bombus pascuorum Scopoli 1763 (hymenoptera: Apidae). Syst Entomol 40:881–890
Lecocq T, Dellicour S, Michez D, Dehon M, Dewulf A, De Meulemeester T, Brasero N, Valterová I, Rasplus JY, Rasmont P (2015c) Methods for species delimitation in bumblebees (hymenoptera, Apidae, Bombus): towards an integrative approach. Zool Scr 44:1–17
Lecocq T, Brasero N, De Meulemeester T, Michez D, Dellicour S, Lhomme P, de Jonghe R, Valterová I, Urbanová K, Rasmont P (2015d) An integrative taxonomic approach to assess the status of Corsican bumblebees: implications for conservation. Anim Conserv 18:236–148
Lhomme P, Sramkova A, Kreuter K, Lecocq T, Rasmont P, Ayasse M (2013) A method for year-round rearing of cuckoo bumblebees (hymenoptera : Apoidea : Bombus subgenus Psithyrus ). Ann Soc entomol Fr (N.S.) 49:37–41
Lhomme P, Ayasse M, Valterová I, Lecocq T, Rasmont P (2015) A scent shield to survive: identification of the repellent compounds secreted by the male offspring of the cuckoo bumblebee Bombus vestalis. Entomol Exp Appl 157:263–270
Linnaeus C (1758) Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis. Holmiae. 823 pp
Lockey KH (1991) Insect hydrocarbon classes: implications for chemotaxonomy. Insect Biochem 21:91–97
Luxová A, Valterová I, Stránský K, Hovorka O, Svatoš A (2003) Biosynthetic studies on marking pheromones of bumblebee males. Chemoecology 13:81–87
Martinet B, Lecocq T, Brasero N, Biella P, Urbanová K, Valterová I, Cornalba M, Gjershaug JO, Michez D, Rasmont P (2017) Following the cold: geographic differentiation between interglacial refugia and speciation in arcto-alpine species complex Bombus monticola (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Syst Entomol (in press)
Michener CD (1990) Classification of the Apidae (hymenoptera). Univ Kans publ, Mus Nat Hist 54:75–164
Oksanen FJ, Blanchet G, Kindt R, Legendre P, McGlinn D, Minchin PR, O'Hara RB, Simpson GL, Solymos P, Stevens MHH, Szoecs E, Wagner H (2017) Tertiary Vegan: Community Ecology Package
Paterson H (1993) Evolution and the recognition concept of species. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Patricelli GL, Uy JAC, Borgia G (2003) Multiple male traits interact: attractive bower decorations facilitate attractive behavioural displays in satin bowerbirds. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 270:2389–2395
Pokorny T, Lunau K, Quezada-Euan JJG (2014) Cuticular hydrocarbons distinguish cryptic sibling species in Euglossa orchid bees. Apidologie 45:276–283
Quicke DJ (1993) Chemotaxonomy and Related Topics. In: Principles and Techniques of Contemporary Taxonomy. Experimental and Clinical Neuroscience. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 146-154
R Development Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. http://www.R-project.org
Rasmont P, Terzo M, Aytekin AM, Hines H, Urbanová K, Cahliková L, Valterová I (2005) Cephalic secretions of the bumblebee subgenus Sibiricobombus Vogt suggest Bombus niveatus Kriechbaumer and Bombus vorticosus Gerstaecker are conspecific (hymenoptera, Apidae, Bombus). Apidologie 36:571–584
Romani R, Isidoro N, Riolo P, Bin F (2003) Antennal glands in males bees: structures for sexual communication by pheromones? Apidologie 34:603–610
Sachse S, Rappert A, Galizia CG (1999) The spatial representation of chemical structures in the antennal lobe of honeybees: steps towards the olfactory code. J Neurosci 11:3970–3982
Sandoz JC (2012) Olfaction in honey bees: from molecules to behavior. In: Galizia G, Eisenhardt D, Giurfa M (eds) Honeybee neurobiology and behavior. A tribute to Randolf Menzel. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 235–252
Sandoz JC, Deisig N, de Brito Sanchez MG, Giurfa M (2007) Understanding the logics of pheromone processing in the honeybee brain: from labeledlines to across-fiber patterns. Front Behav Neurosci 1:5
Skorikov AS (1914) Les formes nouvelles des bourdons (Hymenoptera, Bombidae). V Russkoe éntomologicheskoe Obozrênie 14:119–129
Skorikov AS (1923) Palaearctic bumblebees. Part I. General biology (including zoogeography). Izv Severn Obl Stantsii Zashch Rast Vredit 4:1–160
Strube-Bloss MF, Brown A, Spaethe J, Schmitt T, Rössler W (2015) Extracting the behaviorally relevant stimulus: unique neural representation of farnesol, a component of the recruitment pheromone of Bombus terrestris. PLoS One 10:e0137413
Suzuki R, Shimodaira H (2011) Pvclust: hierarchical clustering with P-values via multiscale bootstrap resampling. Contributed package. Version 1-1.10. Vienna, R foundation for statistical computing. http://www.R-project.org
Svensson BG, Bergström G (1977) Volatile marking secretions from the labial gland of north European Pyrobombus D. T. Males (hymenoptera, Apidae). Insect Soc 24:213–224
Svensson BG, Bergström G (1979) Marking pheromones of Alpinobombus males. J Chem Ecol 5:603–615
Symonds MRE, Moussalli A, Elagar MA (2009) The evolution of sex pheromones in an ecologically diverse genus of flies. Biol J Linn Soc 9:594–603
Tasei JN, Moinard C, Moreau L, Himpens B, Guyonnaud S (1998) Relationship between aging, mating and sperm production in captive Bombus terrestris. J Apic Res 37:107–113
Terzo M, Valterová I, Urbanová K, Rasmont P (2003) De la nécessité de redécrire les phéromones sexuelles des mâles de bourdons [Hymenoptera: Apidae, Bombini] publiées avant 1996 pour leur utilisation en analyse phylogénétique. Phytoprotection 84:39–49
Terzo M, Urbanová K, Valterová I, Rasmont P (2005) Intra and interspecific variability of the cephalic labial glands’ secretions in male bumblebees: the case of Bombus (Thoracobombus) ruderarius and B. (Thoracobombus) sylvarum hymenoptera, Apidae. Apidologie 36:85–96
Terzo M, Valterová I, Rasmont P (2007) Atypical secretions of the male cephalic labial glands in bumblebees: the case of Bombus (Rhodobombus) mesomelas Gerstaecker (hymenoptera, Apidae). Chem Biodivers 4:1466–1471
Tkalců B (1974) Ergebnise der 1. Und 2. Mongolisch-tschechoslowakischen entomologisch-botanischen expedition in der Mongolei nr. 29: hymenoptera, Apoidea, Bombinae. – Acta faunistica entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 15: 25-58
Venables WN, Ripley BD (2002) Modern applied statistics with S. Springer, Queensland
Vogt O (1908) Bombi (Hummeln). Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse von Expedition Filchner nach China und Thibet 1903-1905, X. Band - I. Teil, 1. Abschnitt: Zoologische Sammlungen, Berlin.100–101
Vogt O (1911) Studien über das Artproblem. 2. Mitteilung. über das Variieren der Hummeln. 2. Teil (Schluss). Schriften der berlinischen Gesellschaft Naturforschender, Freunde, Berlin 1911:31–74
Williams PH (1998) An annotated checklist of bumble bees with an analysis of patterns of description (hymenoptera: Apidae, Bombini). Bulletin of The Natural History Museum (Entomology) 67: 79–152. Updated at www.nhm.ac.uk/bombus/ accessed 2017
Wyatt TD (2003) Pheromones and animal behaviour: communication by smell and taste. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Yin X-W, Immacolata I, Marangoni R, Cattonaro F, Flamini G, Sagona S, Zhang L, Pelosi P, Felicioli A (2013) Odorant-binding proteins and olfactory coding in the solitary bee Osmia cornuta. Cell Mol Life Sci 70:3029–3039
Žáček P, Kalinova B, Sobotnik J, Hovorka O, Ptacek V, Coppée A, Vereeghen F, Valterova I (2009) Comparison of age-dependent quantitative changes in the male labial gland secretion of Bombus terrestris and Bombus lucorum. J Chem Ecol 35:698–705
Žáček P, Prchalová-Horňáková D, Tykva R, Kindl J, Vogel H, Svatoš A, Pichová I, Valterová I (2013) De novo biosynthesis of sexual pheromone in the labial gland of bumblebee males. Chembiochem 14:361–371
Acknowledgements
Financial support (IV) was provided by the Institute of Organic Chemistry and Biochemistry of the Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic (#61388963). BM contributed as a PhD student with a grant from the FRS-FNRS (Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique). The authors are particularly grateful to Jean-Christophe Sandoz for all his advice and comments. We acknowledge Elizabeth Curtis for correcting the English.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary file 1
- Data matrix of cephalic labial gland secretions (CLGS) (relative concentration of each compound), list of the identified compounds, kovats indice and IndVal analysis with specific compounds in Bombus deuteronymus superequester, B. exil, B. filchnerae, B. muscorum and B. humilis subbaicalensis. U indicates undetermined compounds. (XLSX 113 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Brasero, N., Lecocq, T., Martinet, B. et al. Variability in Sexual Pheromones Questions their Role in Bumblebee Pre-Mating Recognition System. J Chem Ecol 44, 9–17 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-017-0910-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-017-0910-4