Introduction

Catechol (1,2-dihydroxybenzene), as an important phenolic compound, has widespread used in several fields such as dyes, paper, cosmetics, plastics, synthetic fibers, textiles, agricultural chemicals, and pharmaceuticals [1,2,3,4]. In the process of application, catechol has been recognized as a kind of harmful organic contaminant because its high toxicity cripples the health of many biological species, and low degradability menaces the sustainable development of ecological environment [5, 6]. This has attracted worldwide attention. The emission standard (GB 8978-1996) of China for phenolic compounds is 0.5 mg mL−1 [7]. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the European Union (EU) have included it in the list of primary environmental pollutant to be monitored [8]. Therefore, it is very critical to monitor catechol qualitative and quantitative for human health and ecological environment. Nowadays, various analytical techniques have been developed to detect the catechol, such as synchronous fluorescence [9], gas chromatography [10], spectrophotometry [11], chemiluminescence [12], and electrochemical methods [13, 14]. Compared with other techniques, electrochemical methods stand out due to their merits of economical instrumentation, high sensitivity, fast response, easy operation, facilitation for real-time on-site analysis, and time-saving and have a wide range of applicability in agriculture, industrial food, environmental and clinical analysis [15,16,17,18]. Additionally, it is hard to directly detect catechol with conventional working electrodes owing to the poor current response and fouling on the electrode surface [8]. Hence, a novel electrode material designed to detect catechol sensitively is urgently needed.

Recently, organic–inorganic nanocomposites have focused on much attention because of superior optical, mechanical, electrical, dielectric, magnetic, and photocatalytic properties [19]. Specially, organic–inorganic nanocomposites composed of organic polymers and inorganic nanoparticles express as a new type of materials with significantly enhanced performances when compared with their individual component [20]. Polyaniline (PANI), a sort of conducting electroactive polymer, has presented advantageous redox properties, high conductivity, cost-effectiveness, environmental stability, and simple synthesis process and has exhibited acceptable potential application in electrochemical sensors, conductive fibers, and batteries [21, 22]. Figure 1 shows the basic structure of PANI (y = 0, 0.5, 1), which possesses stable heterocyclic aromatic backbone and functionality-rich skeleton and can be used to fabricate multifunctional nanocomposites [23]. Moreover, the prominent redox behavior of PANI and its ability to regulate the transfer of electrons between the electrode surface and the reaction site make it a promising electrode material for the development of electrochemical sensors [24]. As a result, some polyaniline-based nanocomposites such as BC/clay/PANI, polyaniline/graphene, ZrSiO4@NPANI@nZVCu, polyaniline/zinc bismuthate, SnO2/PANI/Pd have been widely used in aerogels, electrochemical sensors, nanocatalyst, gas sensors and other fields [25,26,27,28,29]. In the field of inorganic materials, two-dimensional layered metal oxide semiconductors (LMOSs) have drawn extensive attention owing to some superior properties of unique layered structure, electrical conductivity, large surface area and ion-exchange capacity [30]. The stability of LMOSs has led to the development of several intercalation techniques to synthesize organic–inorganic nanocomposites based on LMOSs for electrochemical applications, such as MB-Ca2Nb3O10 [31], FeIIITMPyP-Nb3O8 [32], and Li/RGO-MnO2 [33]. KSr2Nb3O10, as a typical LMOS, has the outstanding characteristics of LMOS and was selected as the base material in this work. Herein, a hypothesis was proposed to combine the excellent properties of conductive polymer PANI with the unique features of KSr2Nb3O10, resulting in producing a synergistic effect of these two materials.

Figure 1
figure 1

The basic structure of PANI

In this work, the organic–inorganic layered nanocomposite PANI/HSr2Nb3O10 was constructed by inserting aniline (ANI) molecules into the interlayer of HSr2Nb3O10 and then polymerizing the interlaminar ANI molecules by in situ polymerization. Thereafter, a novel electrochemical sensor based on the PANI/HSr2Nb3O10 nanocomposite was designed for the detection of catechol. The performance of the sensor was studied by cyclic voltammetry (CV) and differential pulse voltammetry (DPV). The analytical results illustrate that the sensor combined with unique properties of PANI and HSr2Nb3O10 exhibited good current response and electrocatalytic activity in the process of detecting catechol.

Experimental

Materials and reagents

Potassium carbonate (K2CO3), strontium carbonate (Sr2CO3), niobium (V) oxide (Nb2O5), and hydrochloric acid (HCl) were bought from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd (China). CC was acquired from Shanghai Aladdin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd (China). Sodium dihydrogen phosphate dihydrate (NaH2PO4·2H2O) and disodium hydrogen phosphate dodecahydrate (Na2HPO4·12H2O) were purchased from Xilong Scientific Co., Ltd (Guangdong, China). All chemicals and reagents were used without further purification.

Fabrication of PANI/HSr2Nb3O10 nanocomposite

The layered host material of KSr2Nb3O10 was synthesized by calcination of the mixture of K2CO3, Sr2CO3 and Nb2O5 in molar ratio of 1.1:4:3 at 1150 °C for 24 h [34]. The resulting KSr2Nb3O10 (1 g) was dispersed in 6 M HCl (30 mL) aqueous solution and stirred at room temperature for three days to obtain the protonated product HSr2Nb3O10. Notably, the fresh HCl was replaced once a day during the proton exchange reaction. The mixed solution was centrifuged at 8000 r min−1 for five minutes and washed with distilled water for several times, and then, the obtained HSr2Nb3O10 was dried at 60 °C in the vacuum oven overnight and stored away.

To prepare the PANI/HSr2Nb3O10 nanocomposite, HSr2Nb3O10 (1 g) was first dissolved in a round-bottom flask with 20 mL distilled water, and then, 3 mL ANI was added to the suspension as well. Herein, the ANI used in the reaction is a newly distilled ANI. The reaction mixture was stirred vigorously at room temperature and carried out in a nitrogen atmosphere. Finally, the suspension was centrifuged and washed with distilled water for three times and then dried at 50 °C in the vacuum oven for 24 h. The harvested white powder was ANI/HSr2Nb3O10.

0.5 g of ANI/HSr2Nb3O10 was dispersed in a mixture containing 0.1 M HCl and 1 M (NH4)2S2O8. Then, the mixed solution was stirred at 50 °C for three days. During the in situ polymerization, the color of the sample changed from white through mazarine to dark gray. After the completion of polymerization, the precipitate was centrifuged and washed several times and dried at 50 °C overnight. The final nanocomposite was named as PANI/HSr2Nb3O10.

Preparation of PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE

2 mg PANI/HSr2Nb3O10 nanocomposite was dispersed into 1 mL distilled water and sonicated for two hours. The obtained homogeneous suspension was dripped onto the polished glassy carbon electrode (GCE) by a drip-coating method. The modified GCE is denoted as PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE. A schematic illustration of fabrication process of PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE electrochemical sensor is shown in Fig. 2.

Figure 2
figure 2

Schematic illustration of fabrication process of PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE electrochemical sensor for detection of catechol

Characterization

X-ray diffraction (XRD) data were obtained by a RINT 2000 diffractometer (Cu Kα radiation, λ = 0.154 nm, Rigaku) with 2θ from 1.5° to 70°. Scanning electron micrograph (SEM) and transmission electron microscope (TEM) images were obtained by a JSM-5600 apparatus working at 15 kV for the samples. The elemental composition of PANI/HSr2Nb3O10 nanocomposite was investigated by a high-angle annular dark-field scanning transmission electron microscope (HAADF-STEM). X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) data were performed from an ESCALAB 250Xi spectrometer. Fourier-transform infrared spectra (FTIR) were collected on a Shimadzu FTIR-8400S spectrometer. Thermal gravimetric/differential scanning calorimetry (TG/DSC) analysis was recorded on a Shimadzu DTG-60 apparatus from room temperature to 900 °C in nitrogen atmosphere. Electrochemical results were obtained by a CHI660C electrochemical workstation with three-electrode system. The platinum wire, saturated calomel electrode (SCE) and the PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE were used as the counter electrode, reference electrode and working electrode, respectively.

Results and discussion

XRD analysis

The XRD patterns of KSr2Nb3O10, HSr2Nb3O10, ANI/HSr2Nb3O10 and PANI/HSr2Nb3O10 are shown in Fig. 3. It can be clearly seen that the KSr2Nb3O10 and HSr2Nb3O10 have strong and sharp diffraction peaks, demonstrating their well crystallinity. However, the crystallinities of the ANI/HSr2Nb3O10 and PANI/HSr2Nb3O10 nanocomposite are relatively poor. The XRD pattern of calcined KSr2Nb3O10 matches well with the previous literature [35]. A sharp (002) diffraction peak of the original KSr2Nb3O10 can be observed at 5.88°. According to Bragg’s Law, the basal spacing (d002) of KSr2Nb3O10 is calculated as 1.50 nm. Through acidification process, the (002) diffraction peak of HSr2Nb3O10 shifts to a lower angle (5.38°), and the basal spacing of HSr2Nb3O10 increases to 1.64 nm. It means that the interlayer distance is enlarged because of the replacement of K+ by H3O+ after the protonation. The shift of the (002) diffraction peak of ANI/HSr2Nb3O10 to a lower 2θ angle (3.61°) because the amino group (–NH2) on the benzene ring reacts with the hydrogen proton in the interlayer to generate –NH3+. In addition, the (002) diffraction peak of PANI/HSr2Nb3O10 at 5.44° is ascribed to the formation of PANI by in situ polymerization of ANI. As the polymerization progressed, the interlayer spacing began to decrease, possibly due to the chemical bonding of ANI molecules [36]. The basal spacing (d) and interlayer spacing (Δd) values of the samples are listed in Table 1. The thickness of [Sr2Nb3O10] slab (1.26 nm) can be obtained by subtracting the diameter of the K+ cation (0.24 nm) [37]. Thereby, the Δd values of ANI/HSr2Nb3O10 and PANI/HSr2Nb3O10 are calculated as 1.16 and 0.35 nm, respectively. In consideration of the molecule length of ANI (0.7 nm) [38], it can be inferred that ANI molecules form a monolayer in the interlayer of [Sr2Nb3O10] nanosheets.

Figure 3
figure 3

XRD patterns of KSr2Nb3O10, HSr2Nb3O10, ANI/HSr2Nb3O10 and PANI/HSr2Nb3O10

Table 1 XRD data of the different samples

Morphology analysis

The morphologies and structures of the obtained samples were confirmed by SEM. As exhibited in Fig. 4a–d, the smooth surface and layered structure of the original KSr2Nb3O10 can be clearly observed. After the proton exchange process, the structure of HSr2Nb3O10 is essentially the same as the original material. With the intercalation of ANI, the surface, and edges of the ANI/HSr2Nb3O10 become rough and irregular. Through in situ polymerization reaction, the laminates of PANI/HSr2Nb3O10 become smaller and agglomerate together, but remain the layered structure. From Fig. 4e, it can be determined that the size of PANI/HSr2Nb3O10 nanocomposite is within the range of several hundred nanometers by TEM. In HRTEM image of nanocomposite (Fig. 4f), the spacing between the two red labeled laminates is 0.35 nm, which is consistent with the result of XRD. Additionally, the element composition of PANI/HSr2Nb3O10 nanocomposite was analyzed by HAADF-STEM in Fig. 4g–m. The elemental mapping images illustrate that the PANI/HSr2Nb3O10 nanocomposite is composed of C, N, O, Sr and Nb elements with well spatial distribution, in which elements C and N are ascribed to PANI, and elements O, Sr and Nb are assigned to HSr2Nb3O10, verifying the successful preparation of the nanocomposite.

Figure 4
figure 4

SEM images of a KSr2Nb3O10, b HSr2Nb3O10, c ANI/HSr2Nb3O10 and d PANI/HSr2Nb3O10; e TEM, f HRTEM, g HAADF-STEM and hm Elemental mapping images of PANI/HSr2Nb3O10 nanocomposite

XPS analysis

The surface chemical composition and valence states of elements in PANI/HSr2Nb3O10 nanocomposite were examined by the XPS measurements. As displayed in Fig. 5a, the survey spectrum of PANI/HSr2Nb3O10 nanocomposite confirms the existence of O, N, C, Nb, and Sr elements, which is consistent with the results of elemental mapping images. For the Sr 3d spectrum in Fig. 5b, the binding energy peaks observed at 133 and 134.7 eV are attributed to 3d5/2 and 3d3/2 of Sr, respectively, indicating the presence of + 2 oxidation state of Sr element in the nanocomposite [39]. From image of Fig. 5c, two peaks at 207.1 and 209.9 eV are assigned to Nb 3d5/2 and Nb 3d3/2, respectively, which is ascribed to + 5 oxidation state of Nb element [40]. The XPS spectrum of N 1 s (Fig. 5d) shows three characteristic peaks for PANI/HSr2Nb3O10. The strong peak at 399.8 eV and the weak peaks at 395.2 and 401.3 eV are, respectively, classified as the amine N, imine N, and positively charged N [41]. XPS measurement results combined with XRD and element mapping images analysis further prove the successful preparation of the nanocomposite.

Figure 5
figure 5

a XPS survey spectrum of PANI/HSr2Nb3O10 nanocomposite; XPS spectra of b Sr 3d, c Nb 3d, and d N 1 s

IR and thermogravimetric analysis

The IR spectra of KSr2Nb3O10, PANI and PANI/HSr2Nb3O10 are presented in Fig. S1a. The characteristic bands of KSr2Nb3O10 at 924 and 584 cm−1 are attributed to the stretching vibration of Nb–O [42]. Similarly, these absorption bands also appear in polymerized product. For PANI/HSr2Nb3O10, some characteristic bands belonging to PANI can be observed at 1638 cm−1 [v(C=N)], 1489, 1392 cm−1 [benzenoid ring v(C=C)], 1322 cm−1 [v(C–N)] and 1131 cm−1 [v(C–H)] [43]. The results confirm the existence of PANI in the PANI/HSr2Nb3O10 nanocomposite.

The weight loss of KSr2Nb3O10 and PANI/HSr2Nb3O10 nanocomposite in the range of room temperature to 900 °C was identified by TG/DSC curves. As shown in Fig. S1b, the thermal behavior of PANI/HSr2Nb3O10 nanocomposite shows three-step weight loss process. Briefly, the three steps are divided into 25–100 °C, 100–535 °C and 535–900 °C. The corresponding thermal weightlessness processes are assigned to the vaporization of water, elimination of HCl and decomposition of PANI, respectively. Furthermore, the exothermic peak of PANI/HSr2Nb3O10 nanocomposite appears at 809 °C, which is much higher than pure PANI (530 °C) [44]. This result demonstrates that the PANI/HSr2Nb3O10 nanocomposite has higher thermal stability.

Electrochemical characterization of the modified GCEs

Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was adopted to compare the electron transfer properties of different modified GCEs. The Nyquist plot of bare electrode, KSr2Nb3O10/GCE, and PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE in 0.5 mM K3[Fe(CN)6] and 0.5 mM K4[Fe(CN)6] containing 0.1 M KCl with frequency range of 1 to 105 Hz is presented in Fig. 6a. The Nyquist diagram consists of a low-frequency linear part and a high-frequency semicircle part, which are attributed to the linear diffusion control process and the electron transfer resistance (Rct), respectively. The Nyquist plot of PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE shows the smallest Rct than other modified GCEs, illustrating greater conductivity and faster electron transfer capability. Under the same condition, the electrochemical performance of the electrode was measured by CV technique. As shown in Fig. 6b, all modified GCEs exhibit a pair of well-defined redox peaks, and the highest redox current response is observed on PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE. Meanwhile, the peak-to-peak separation value (ΔEp = 0.203 V) of PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE is lower than bare electrode (ΔEp = 0.403 V) and KSr2Nb3O10/GCE (ΔEp = 0.497 V). These electrochemical behaviors further confirm the great catalytic activity of PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE and can accelerate electron transfer.

Figure 6
figure 6

a Nyquist plots and b CV curves of bare electrode, KSr2Nb3O10/GCE and PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE in 0.5 mM K3[Fe(CN)6] and 0.5 mM K4[Fe(CN)6] containing 0.1 M KCl

In Fig. S2, the electrochemical active surface areas of bare electrode, KSr2Nb3O10/GCE, and PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE were examined by CV technique in 0.5 mM [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− containing 0.1 M KCl at different scan rates. For a reversible redox reaction, the following Randles–Sevcik equation can be used [45]:

$$I_{{\text{p}}} = {2}.{69} \times {1}0^{{5}} \times D^{{{1}/{2}}} \times A \times v^{{{1}/{2}}} \times n^{{{3}/{2}}} \times C$$

where Ip represents the peak current, D is the diffusion coefficient of [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− (1 × 10–5 cm2 s−1), A refers to the surface area of the electrode, v is the scan rate (mV s−1), n is the number of electron transferred (n = 1), and C is the concentration of [Fe(CN)6]3−/4− (0.5 mM). The electrochemical active surface areas of bare electrode, KSr2Nb3O10/GCE, and PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE were calculated as 0.0019, 0.0017, and 0.0026 cm2, respectively. PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE exhibits a larger active area, indicating that the prepared nanocomposite can greatly increase the effective area of the GCE.

Electrochemical behavior of PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE

Figure 7a shows the CV curves of PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE at different scan rates in 0.1 M HCl solution. The modified electrode exhibits good redox activity in the acid solution. The redox reaction mechanism is illustrated in Scheme 1 [24]. Specifically, the redox peak at − 0.14 V is due to the transition from a complete reduced leucoemeraldine state to a semi-oxidized emeraldine state. Another redox peak (0.08 V) is assigned to the conversion of emeraldine state to fully oxidized pernigraniline state [46]. With the increase of the scan rate, the anodic and cathodic peaks shift slightly to the positive and negative directions, respectively. Besides, the redox peaks become more and more obvious, and the peak current values also increase gradually. The anodic peak current (Ipa) is proportional to the scan rate (v), and the linear relationship between Ipa and v is plotted in Fig. 7b. The linear equation can be described as Ipa (μA) = 0.43 + 0.008 v (mV s−1) (n = 7, R = 0.9994), which illustrates that the redox reaction is a typical surface-controlled process. Here, n and R represent the number of scans and linear correlation coefficients, respectively.

Figure 7
figure 7

a CV curves of PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE in 0.1 M HCl solution at scan rate from 100 to 400 mV s−1; b The relationship curve between Ipa and v

Scheme 1
scheme 1

The redox reaction mechanism of PANI in 0.1 M HCl

Effect of pH

The influence of the pH of HCl on the electrochemical response of PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE for the detection of catechol was explored by DPV technique. The plot of the response current versus different pH values (pH = 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0 and 5.0) of HCl is depicted in Fig. S3. The response current decreases with the increase of pH, and PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE shows the maximum response current at pH 1.0. Hence, the HCl with pH 1.0 (the concentration is 0.1 M) was used as the optimal condition for the remaining experiments.

Electrochemical behavior of catechol at PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE

The individual electrocatalytic performance of catechol at different modified electrodes was evaluated using CV technique in 0.1 M HCl solution at scan rate of 100 mV s−1. As given in Fig. 8, bare electrode, KSr2Nb3O10/GCE, HSr2Nb3O10/GCE, PANI/GCE and PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE all display a pair of obvious redox peaks for catechol, indicating that the reversibility of the electron transfer process of catechol. For bare electrode, the peak-to-peak separation value (ΔEp = 0.546 V) is the highest, and the anodic and cathodic peak currents are lowest, demonstrating that the bare electrode has poor electrocatalytic performance for catechol. Moreover, the ΔEp values of 0.501 and 0.468 V are observed at KSr2Nb3O10/GCE and PANI/GCE, respectively, and the current values of the two modified electrodes are almost the same. The recorded current of PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE began to peak generated by the oxidation of catechol at about 0.5 V and reached the maximum peak at 0.648 V in the positive scanning. In the reverse scanning process, the reduction peak was obtained at 0.3 V, which was ascribed to a reversible conversion between catechol and quinone [45]. The probable redox reaction mechanism of catechol at PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE can be expressed in scheme 2 [47]. Concretely, as presented in Eq. (1), the catechol adsorbed on the surface of the modified electrode forms two hydrogen bonds with two imine hydrogen atoms on the PANI, and then, two series of single-electron transitions occur [48]. The total reaction equation can be represented as Eq. (2). Compared with the above three modified electrodes, PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE displays the smallest ΔEp value (0.348 V) and highest peak current, illustrating that PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE possesses faster electron transfer ability and larger electroactive surface area due to the synergistic effect between PANI and HSr2Nb3O10. This result suggests that PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE has excellent electrocatalytic performance for the detection of catechol.

Figure 8
figure 8

CV curves of bare electrode (dash line), KSr2Nb3O10/GCE (dash dot line), PANI/GCE (short dash line) and PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE (solid line) in 0.1 M HCl solution containing 1.64 mM catechol at a scan rate of 100 mV s−1

Scheme 2
scheme 2

The redox mechanism of catechol at PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE

Effect of scan rate

To further understand the electrochemical redox reaction kinetics of catechol, the effect of scan rate on PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE was investigated by CV in the potential range from − 0.4 to 1.0 V. As presented in Fig. 9a, the regular CV curves of PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE in 0.1 M HCl containing 1.64 mM catechol at different sweeping scan rates were clearly observed. The anodic and cathodic peak currents (Ipa, Ipc) of catechol at PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE increase with the increasing the scan rates and are linearly dependent on the square root of scan rate (v1/2). Two linear relationships are depicted in Fig. 9b, and the regression equations of catechol can be represented as Ipa (μA) = 9.54 + 5.37 v1/2 (mV1/2 s−1/2) (n = 12, R = 0.9996) and Ipc (μA) = − 0.74 − 3.08 v1/2 (mV1/2 s−1/2) (n = 12, R = − 0.9974). These results indicate that the redox reaction of catechol at PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE is typical diffusion-controlled process.

Figure 9
figure 9

a CV curves of PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE in 0.1 M HCl solution containing 1.64 mM catechol at scan rates of 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90, 100, 150, 200, 250 and 300 mV s−1; b the relationship curves between the Ipa, Ipc of catechol and v1/2; c DPV curves of PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE in 0.1 M HCl solution with different concentrations of catechol; d the relationship between Ipa and concentrations of catechol

Determination of catechol on PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE

DPV technique featured with high sensitivity and resolution has been widely employed to quantitative analysis of some biomolecules. Herein, DPV tests were carried out on PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE by increasing the concentration of catechol in 0.1 M HCl. From image of Fig. 9c, the response currents gradually increase and the potential values remain at about 0.6 V with the successive addition of the concentration of catechol. The oxidation peak current of PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE is proportional to the concentration (C) of catechol, as illustrated in Fig. 9d. The linear equation in the different concentration intervals 0.025–4.97 mM can be expressed as Ipa (μA) = 0.014 C (μM) + 0.76 (n = 15, R = 0.9998), and the limit of detection (LOD) was calculated to be 0.02 μM at a signal-to-noise ratio of 3.0. To estimate the performance of the as-prepared PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE, the above analytical results are compared with some previous studies on the detection of catechol. As presented in Table 2, the obtained PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE shows lower detection limit and wider linear concentration range than most other modified electrodes. Therefore, PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE can be regarded as a promising electrode material for electrochemical detection of catechol.

Table 2 Comparison for determination of catechol at different modified electrodes

Repeatability, stability, reproducibility, and anti-interference of PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE

The repeatability, stability, reproducibility, and anti-interference are significantly important parameters to evaluate the practicability and applicability of electrochemical sensor. The repeatability of PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE was examined by measuring the DPV responses to 0.82 mM catechol in 0.1 M HCl. Figure 10a displays the DPV curves of fifty consecutive tests, and these curves almost completely coincident, like one curve, with the peak current and potential values basically unchanged. This indicates that PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE possesses excellent repeatability. Additionally, PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE was stored under ambient conditions and tracked for fifteen days to explore its long-term stability. As depicted in Fig. 10b, after fifteen days, the current response maintained approximately 93.72% of the initial measured value, suggesting the good stability of PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE. The reproducibility was assessed from the DPV current response to catechol at five different GECs prepared independently under the same condition. Five obtained similar current values can be observed in Fig. 10c, and their relative standard deviation (RSD) was calculated as 0.58%, demonstrating the superior reproducibility of PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE. Figure 10d studies the anti-interference ability of PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE to catechol, some possible interfering substances such as K2CO3, uric acid (UA), MgSO4, CuSO4, phenol and p-Nitrophenol (p-NP) which commonly co-exist with catechol were added in the detection of catechol. In the DPV analysis of 0.76 mM catechol, the obvious current response can still be observed under the influence of interferents whose concentration is 100 times that of catechol. This illustrates the good selectivity and anti-interference of PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE. According to the above results, the outstanding repeatability, stability, reproducibility, and anti-interference indicate that PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE can be served as reliable electrochemical sensor for the detection of catechol.

Figure 10
figure 10

a Repeatability, b long-term stability and c reproducibility measurements of PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE in 0.1 HCl solution containing 0.82 mM catechol; d interference measurements of PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE with 0.76 mM catechol in the presence of 76 mM interfering substances

Real sample analysis

To evaluate the effectiveness of the prepared electrochemical sensor in the real system, PANI/HSr2Nb3O10/GCE was carried out to detect the catechol in local tap water sample by the standard addition method. As shown in Table 3, the recoveries of catechol were calculated in the range of 95.3–105.1%, and three groups of parallel experiments were recorded with the RSD values ranging from 1.1 to 3.3%. The results indicate that the proposed electrochemical sensor displays the satisfactory performance and can be used in practical applications.

Table 3 Determination of catechol in tap water

Conclusion

In this work, an organic/inorganic nanocomposite PANI/HSr2Nb3O10 with interesting characteristics was prepared by inserting aniline monomers into the interlayer of HSr2Nb3O10, followed by in situ polymerization reaction between the layers. The successful intercalation and in situ polymerization of ANI monomers were certified by XRD, SEM, TEM, and IR. In addition, the composition of the nanocomposite was further proved by the elemental analysis and XPS analysis. Based on the TG/DSC analysis, the thermally stability of PANI/HSr2Nb3O10 nanocomposite was greatly improved. Under the synergistic effect of PANI and HSr2Nb3O10, the electrochemical sensor constructed based on the nanocomposite displays prominent electrocatalytic performance toward catechol with the low detection limit and the wide linear concentration range. The sensor also shows good repeatability, stability, reproducibility, and anti-interference in detecting catechol. Hence, the developed PANI/HSr2Nb3O10 nanocomposite can be served as an effective electrode material for detecting catechol and has potential application value in electrochemical sensor.