Abstract
Despite feather fungi being an important component of the Arctic fungal flora, their ecological role and diversity are not fully known. In the current study, fungal cultures were isolated from feathers (barnacle goose, common eider, and glaucous gull) collected in the Ny-Ålesund region, Svalbard. Isolates were identified by ITS region sequences, which include the ITS1, ITS2, and 5.8S rRNA. The result showed culturable yeast and filamentous fungi belonging to three classes: Ascomycota (Pyrenochaetopsis pratorum, Cladosporium herbarum, Thelebolus microsporus, Aspergillus versicolor, Penicillium commune, and Venturia sp.), Basidiomycota (Mrakia blollopis and Rhodotorula mucilaginosa), and Zygomycota (Mucor flavus). Most of the fungal isolates appeared to be cold-tolerant, and about 60 % of the isolates showed keratinase activity. The reasonably low fungal diversity colonizing feathers indicates that the birds of Svalbard are casual carriers of fungi which may result in a negligible impact on their health. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first record of fungal communities present on the feathers of birds in the high Arctic.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Fungi have enormous ecological importance due to wide morphological diversity, life strategies, and also the ability to interact with various biotic and abiotic components of the environment (Hawksworth 1991 ; Peay et al. 2008). Polar fungi have the ability to grow in oligotrophic cold environments (Connell et al. 2008) and to produce cold-active enzymes (Buzzini et al. 2012), but their ecological role is poorly understood (Buzzini et al. 2012; Dynowska et al. 2013).
Mycological exploration in Svalbard began with the study of Karsten (1872). Elvebakk et al. (1996) taxonomically listed 389 species of fungi belonging to Myxomycota, Oomycota, Chytridiomycota, Zygomycota, Ascomycota, Deuteromycota, and Basidiomycota. From moss colonies of Svalbard, Hoshino et al. (1999) isolated Pythium ultimum Throw var. ultimum. From Norway and Svalbard, Aarnæs (2002) prepared a catalogue on “macro- and micromycetes”. Kurek et al. (2007) characterized soil filamentous fungi from Bellsund region of Spitsbergen. Pang et al. (2008, 2009) had delineated two novel fungal species from marine habitat of Svalbard. Singh et al. (2012) reported 19 species under 14 genera (Acremonium, Arthrinium, Aspergillus, Cladosporium, Corynespora, Emericella, Geomyces, Mortierella, Mucor, Myrothecium, Penicillium, Phialophora, Preussia, and Xylaria) from soils of Ny-Ålesund. Recently, pathogenic yeasts have also been reported from the throat and cloaca of the little auk (Alle alle), an Arctic colonial seabird (Dynowska et al. 2013). However, the composition of fungal flora in Arctic bird’s feathers has not been investigated.
In cold environments, fungi have been isolated from various substrates and habitats such as permafrost (Ivarson 1965; Ozerskaya et al. 2009); glacial ice (Reeve et al. 2002; Butinar et al. 2007); cryoconite holes (Säwström et al. 2002); soil (Callaghan et al. 2004); puddles (Pathan et al. 2009); and Arctic coastal environments (Butinar et al. 2011). Fungi colonize either as normal harmless biota on animals and humans (Barnett et al. 2000) or as pathogens (Ghannuaum and Abu-Elteen 1990; Dynowska and Kisicka 2005a). However, a few fungal species (Aspergillus fumigates, A. flavus, Candida albicans, C. tropicalis, C. glabrata, etc.) are harmless to some animal species but may be pathogenic to others (Dynowska and Kisicka 2005a, b; Tsiodras et al. 2008). Arctic birds have been considered an excellent host and/or vector of fungi (Dynowska et al. 2013) and bacteria (Sjolund et al. 2008). In addition to the Arctic, birds from various other areas have also been reported as fungal carriers (Dupont et al. 1994; Tsiodras et al. 2008). Knowledge of fungi growing on birds from the Arctic (Wojczulanis-Jakubas et al. 2011; Dynowska et al. 2013) and Antarctic (Del Frate and Caretta 1990; Singh et al. 2014) region is very limited. The presence of fungi on the feathers of common, clinically healthy birds from tropical, subtropical, and other than polar regions (Buck 1983; Buck and Chabasse 1998; Mancianti et al. 2002; Czeczuga et al. 2004; Dynowska and Kisicka 2005a, b; Cafarchia et al. 2006; Kutty and Philip 2008; Mandeel et al. 2011; Miljković et al. 2011; Gungnani et al. 2012) has also been documented. The migration and its epidemiological significance of pathogenic fungi among different habitats with respect to wild birds have been reported (Tsiodras et al. 2008).
Due to the impact of climate change, the Arctic has experienced a twofold higher increase in temperature compared to most parts of world (IPCC 2007). As a result, there is the possibility of an emergence of different fungi and an increase in the prevalence of potentially pathogenic fungi colonizing birds (Dynowska and Kisicka 2005a). Moreover, due to increasing temperatures, the dormant mesophilic fungal spores (including bird’s pathogens) which are carried by birds, air, and anthropogenic activities may emerge and colonize areas of Arctic. Therefore, there is a need to examine more birds from the Arctic regions.
Some birds such as barnacle goose (Branta leucopsis), common eider (Somateria mollissima), and glaucous gull (Larus hyperboreus) were sampled in Svalbard during the Arctic summer. The barnacle goose builds their nests on small islands and mountain cliffs, while the common eider builds its nest close to the coasts. Both the barnacle goose and the common eider choose to feed in the wetland area. The glaucous gull builds nests on the ground or on cliffs and feeds in Kongsfjorden coasts and on the wetlands. These birds breed in Svalbard during the Arctic summer and are considered to be an important component of the Svalbard terrestrial ecosystem.
Fungi have various nutritional modes and ecological behaviours (saprotrophy, necrotrophy, and biotrophy); however, numerous fungi do not restrict themselves to a single mode but exhibit varying degrees of flexibility in response to changes in their environment through mechanism of heterokaryosis and differential gene expression (Cooke and Whipps 1993). Keratinophilic fungi are considered to be natural colonizer of partially degraded keratin substrate which are used as a source of carbon, nitrogen, and sulphur (Griffin 1960; De Vries 1962). However, keratinolytic fungi are only those that are truly capable of attacking and demolishing keratin (Majchrowicz and Dominik 1969; Dominik et al. 1973; Filipello Marchisio 2000). The specialized fungal organs (hyphae) and enzymes (keratinases) together are accountable for keratinolytic activity (Kunert 1972; Böckle et al. 1995; Filipello Marchisio 2000). It has been reported that, like many other fungal biochemical activities, keratinolysis does not have a species-specific character (Filipello Marchisio 1986; Filipello Marchisio et al. 1991, 1994). An individual species within the same environmental conditions has both active and non-active strains, and each strain/isolate showed variations in the manner and intensity in which they attack the keratin substrate and differentiate specialized structures, therefore termed as a “potentially keratinolytic species” (Filipello Marchisio 2000).
The current study was planned to evaluate the species composition and prevalence of filamentous fungi and yeasts on feathers of birds in Svalbard. Furthermore, we have investigated keratinophilic/keratinolytic activity of feather fungi. Moreover, we have also examined the biosafety level of the fungal species.
Materials and methods
Study site and sampling methods
Spitsbergen is the largest island of the Svalbard archipelago. The mean air temperature is −14 °C in the coldest month (February) and +5 °C in the warmest month (July) (Nygaard 2009). In the present study, bird’s feathers were sampled from their breeding places near the Kongsfjorden coast as well as the coast of an island inside the fjord and mountain cliffs around Ny-Ålesund (78°55′N, 11°56′E) in Svalbard (Fig. 1). Without harming birds, three feather samples were collected from five adult individuals of each bird species (barnacle goose, common eider, and glaucous gull) using sterile gloves, forceps, and a sample collector (HiMedia Laboratories) from 6 to 7 July 2012. The samples were stored at −20 °C for one day and transported, with ice packs, within 24 h to the laboratory. The bird’s feathers vane was analysed for culture-based studies.
Isolation of fungi and their characteristics
The collected feathers were inoculated onto a Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA) artificial mycological medium. This medium was composed of a mixture of peptic digest of animal tissue and pancreatic digest of casein (1:1) 10 g/l, dextrose 40 g/l, and agar 15 g/l with pH, after sterilization, of 5.6 ± 0.2. To get psychrophilic fungal isolates for screening of keratinase activity and to avoid the growth of mesophilic fungi, the plates were incubated in 4 and 15 °C for 3 weeks. Cultures plates were monitored regularly on the basis of shape, colour, and different morphological features (hyphae, conidiophore, and conidial structure). The distinct colony was picked up, subcultured, and observed for purity of cultures under a microscope. Pure cultures were further incubated at 22, 25, and 30 °C to see whether it had the ability to grow at higher temperatures.
The purified fungal colonies were transferred onto the SDA slants medium solidified in a test tube at about a 35° slant to provide more surface area for fungal growth for detailed study. For morphotaxonomical studies, the fungal mounts were prepared on slides using lactophenol-cotton blue as a mounting medium and observed under Olympus BX-51 and IX-71 model microscopes. Fungal cultures were initially identified on the basis of morphotaxonomy with the help of standard literature (Rapper and Fennell 1965; Ellis 1971, 1976; Barron 1977; Pitt 1979; Schneider 1979; Carmichael et al. 1980; Domsch et al. 1980; Samson and Frisvad 2004; De Hoog et al. 2005; Kirk et al. 2008; de Gruyter et al. 2010; Kurtzman et al. 2011). The isolates with similar morphological characteristics were grouped together, and the representative isolates were subjected to DNA sequence analysis of ITS region. All identified pure cultures were maintained on SDA slants and deposited at the National Fungal Culture Collection of India (NFCCI-WDCM 932) in Pune, India.
Molecular characterization: polymerase chain reaction (PCR), sequencing, and phylogenetic analysis
Total DNA was extracted from cultures (grown on SDA for 3 weeks at 4 °C) using the ISOPLANT II kit (Wako Pure Chemical Industries Ltd., Japan). Extracted DNA was amplified by PCR method using KOD-plus DNA polymerase (Toyobo Co. Ltd., Japan). The ITS region was amplified using following primers: ITS1F (5′-GTA ACA AGG TTT CCG T) and ITS4 (5´-TCC TCC GCT TAT TGA TAT GC). The amplified DNA was purified using a Wizard® SV Gel and PCR Clean-Up System (Promega KK, Tokyo, Japan). And finally, the purified DNA was sequenced at Macrogen Japan (Tokyo, Japan).
The sequences of isolates (DDBJ AB916505 to AB916517) were deposited in the DNA data bank and were subjected to a NCBI BLAST search. Sequence alignment of ITS region isolates, together with the homologous sequences (retrieved from GenBank) of closely related species, was performed using Clustal W option of MEGA software version 6.05 (Tamura et al. 2013).
To calculate the sequence divergence, the matrix was analysed with the neighbour-joining method (Saitou and Nei 1987) using the Tamura–Nei model (Tamura and Nei 1993) and maximum parsimony method (Tamura et al. 2011). To represent the evolutionary history of the taxa, the bootstrap consensus tree was inferred from 1000 replicates (Felsenstein 1985). The pairwise alignment was performed using EMBOSS Matcher—Pairwise Sequence Alignment tool (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/psa/emboss_matcher/nucleotide.html).
Screening for keratinase activity
Screening tests on agar plates, using keratin substrate (HiMedia), were performed using the method described by Wawrzkiewicz et al. (1991). The activity of fungus was detected as a clear zone around the colony after incubation of 10 days at a temperature of 4 and 15 °C. The diameter of the clear zone was measured to quantify the enzyme activity.
Biosafety classification
Classification of isolated feather fungi based on biosafety level was done by comparing the species with the database present on www.cbs.knaw.nl and using standard literature (Hoog 1996).
Results
Out of 15 feathers of barnacle goose, 31 isolates were purified from 10 feathers, while the remaining 5 showed no fungal growth on the SDA plates. Likewise, 7 out of 15 feathers of common eider yielded 15 isolates, while the remaining 8 did not give rise to fungal colonies on the plate. Similarly, out of 15 glaucous gull feathers, only 4 of the feathers gave rise to 5 isolates on the SDA plates, while the remaining 11 feathers appeared to be sterile. The total 51 isolates obtained were then classified into 9 groups representing six species of filamentous fungi and three species of yeasts (Table 1). On the basis of ITS region sequence data, the isolates of yeasts and filamentous fungi belonged to six genera (Pyrenochaetopsis, Cladosporium, Thelebolus, Aspergillus, Penicillium, and Venturia) in class Ascomycota, two genera (Mrakia, Rhodotorula) in Basidiomycota, and one (Mucor) in Zygomycota. The seven species of feather fungi (Pyrenochaetopsis pratorum, Thelebolus microsporus, Aspergillus versicolor, Venturia sp., Mrakia blollopis, Rhodotorula mucilaginosa, and Mucor flavus) were isolated from barnacle goose, two species (Cladosporium herbarum and Penicillium commune) were isolated from common eider, and one species Mucor flavus was isolated from glaucous gulls (Table 1).
The total sequence lengths after alignment, % sequence similarities, number of positions with base changes, and the NCBI sequence deposition numbers are given in Table 1. The sequence analysis of the 18S rRNA domain of isolate Pyrenochaetopsis sp. PG293 (AB916515) indicated their closest relationship with species of Pyrenochaetopsis pratorum CBS 445.81 (JF740263), Cladosporium sp. PG246 (AB916505) resembled with Cladosporium herbarum CBS 399.80 (AJ244227). Thelebolus sp. PG278 (AB916508) resembled Thelebolus microsporus BI 15-1-1 (GU004196). The results for Aspergillus sp. PG277 (AB916513) indicated that its closest relationship is with Aspergillus versicolor RF6 (GU232767). The sequence analysis results of isolate Penicillium sp. PG291 (AB916511) resembled those of Penicillium commune H09-122 (KC009831), and Venturia sp. PG255 (AB916509) indicated their closest relationship with species of Venturia polygoni-vivipari CBS 114207 (EU035466) by 97.6 % gene similarity and is a novel species yet to be established. Mrakia sp. PG265 (AB916506) resembled Mrakia blollopis CBS8909 (AY038828). Rhodotorula sp. PG294 (AB916512) results indicated their closest relationship with Rhodotorula mucilaginosa UOA/HCPF 10538 (HQ702343). Mucor sp. PG272 (AB916507) resembled Mucor flavus CBS992.68 (JN206067). Phylogenetic trees of fungi of the present study belonging to Ascomycota, Basidiomycota, and Zygomycota are shown in Fig. 2a, b, c.
The feathers, incubated on the SDA medium at 4 and 15 °C for 3 weeks, were shown to be similar types of isolates at both temperatures, but the size of the colony is twofold smaller at 4 °C than at 15 °C. Most of isolates were able to grow up to 25 °C, but only 3 isolates of Penicillium and 2 Aspergillus isolates were able to grow at 30 °C. These results indicate that some bird feather fungi are psychrotolerant in nature.
Results of keratinase screening revealed that out of 51 isolates, thirty were keratinase positive. The isolates of Pyrenochaetopsis sp. PG293, Cladosporium sp. PG246, Thelebolus sp. PG278, Penicillium sp. PG291, and Mrakia sp. PG256 proved to have keratinase activity in general (Table 1). However, the strains of genus Pyrenochaetopsis and Thelebolus had showed a strong keratinase activity, while strains of genus Mrakia had shown a very week keratinase activity. Among the 8 isolates of genus Penicillium, 5 have shown moderate activity, while 3 have showed no activity.
All the feather fungal isolates were found to be biosafety level BS-1.
Discussion
Due to oligotrophic condition, the colonization and diversity of fungi are very poor in Arctic environment. There is variation in pattern of distribution of fungal strains in the three birds studied. Occurrence of yeast and filamentous fungi on feathers is less frequent and is observed only on a few samples of the studied birds (barnacle goose, common eider, and glaucous gull) in the area of Kongsfjorden. Likewise, low-frequency occurrence of the fungi has also been observed in throat and cloaca of the little auk in region of Svalbard. Furthermore, the prevalence of the yeast in little auk was reported to be very low (Dynowska et al. 2013). Incidence of yeast has also been reported in other seabirds (Kutty and Philip 2008). Thelebolus sp. has also been reported in natural association with feathers and sculls of skuas, petrels, and other birds (Singh et al. 2014; Tsuji et al. 2013a). De Hoog et al. (2005) suggested a distribution of this fungal strain through bird vectors, in various habitats of Antarctica.
Fungi Cladosporium, Penicillium, and Aspergillus were found during the current study on the feathers of Kongsfjorden, and this has also been reported to be present in the Arctic soils (Holding 1981; Bergero et al. 1999; Kurek et al. 2007; Singh et al. 2012). Most of the feather fungi isolated were capable of growing between 4 and 25 °C, and a few up to 30 °C, indicating that some of the bird feather fungi are psychrotolerant in nature. Since the birds are migratory in nature, feather colonizing fungi may have survived in a range of temperatures at different geographical locations inhabited by the birds (breeding place to wintering places). This psychrotolerant nature of fungi has also been reported in Arctic soil by Bergero et al. (1999), Kytöviita (2005), and Singh et al. (2012). The physical adaptations that help the fungi overcome low temperature and water stress include formation of chlamydospores and mycelial thickening (Robinson 2001). Similar adaptive features have also been observed in the present study in Svalbard.
The fungal species recorded in current study is different from the species reported present in internal organs (throat and cloaca of little auk). Colonization of fungi in birds depends on many factors such as feeding habit, nature of habitat (feather, throat, and cloaca) and temperature difference on the surface (feathers), and the internal organs (throat and cloaca). The current study in healthy birds shows a low incidence of fungi on feathers when compared to other non-polar birds. Moreover, low frequency of occurrence of yeasts on Arctic bird with minor impact on health has also been reported (Dynowska et al. 2013) and Dynowska and Kisicka (2005a, b) taking into consideration that the birds are random carriers of the fungi. The species composition of fungi examined during the current study belongs to nine genera (Table 1). From the current study, nine species of fungi would be a good indicator of fungal load on feathers. Likewise, Dynowska et al. (2013) also reported 12 species of yeast belonging to eight genera in auk birds. It has been assumed that the reported yeasts from birds are likely to be present in the Arctic habitat (Dynowska et al. 2013).
The occurrence of fungi in feathers of birds could arise due to the possibility of change in nutritional mode allowing them to hydrolysed keratin for their nutrition. Cooke and Whipps (1993) have reported on the nutritional alternative imposed on a fungus by its environment and the narrowing of specialism within a single mode. Keratins are insoluble fibrous proteins, and in nature, there exist as α-keratins and β-keratins (Lehninger 1984). The α-keratins is an insoluble fibrous protein, due to tight packing of their polypeptide chains in α-helix structure and their linkages by disulphide bridges, and hence rendering them poorly biodegradable (Filipello Marchisio 2000). During the current study, the isolates of Cladosporium, Penicillium, and Aspergillus from feathers were also examined for keratinase activity. This activity is moderately spread among feather fungi. Thus, it can be concluded that keratinase activity is widespread among bird feather fungi and it does not follow that all isolates of the same species will represent similar activity. Keratinolytic fungi such as Cladosporium, Penicillium, and Aspergillus have also been reported from areas other than polar region (Friedrich et al. 1999). Fungi are able to degrade the keratinic substrates in nature mainly by a biochemical process (keratinases) and morphological structures (hyphae) (Takiuchi et al. 1984; Yu et al. 1969; Malviya et al. 1992; Filipello Marchisio 2000). Therefore, in natural environments, keratinolytic fungi are involved in recycling carbon, nitrogen, and sulphur (Filipello Marchisio 2000). The ecological role of fungi in decomposing complex keratin polymer is important for bioconversion and the nutrient cycle (Friedrich et al. 1999; Peay et al. 2008).
The role of migratory birds entering the Svalbard region for breeding purposes acts as a vector for colonization of fungi in new habitats (glacier) in the Arctic region. Mrakia sp. and Rhodotorula mucilaginosa have been recorded from Svalbard glaciers (Singh and Singh 2012; Singh et al. 2013), and the occurrence of these two species of yeast on glaciers suggests a possible transmittance of fungi by birds. Mrakia blollopis (Thomas-Hall et al. 2010) is a bipolar species and has the unique ability of fermentating various sugars at a low-temperature condition (Tsuji et al. 2013b). Dynowska and Kisicka (2005a, b) opined that the fungi proliferating in marine and terrestrial habitats may passively colonize the avian host through various ways (during nesting incubation, chick rearing, and resting or foraging in water), but the birds need to spend a considerable amount of time in the environment to allow fungal colonization and acclimatization (Dynowska et al. 2013). Over the period of time, these fungi may acclimatize and become harmful to the birds.
To understand the potential hazard faced by scientists (e.g. ornithologists), laboratory personnel, and the environment, the fungal species were classified in accordance with their biosafety levels (Hoog 1996; www.cbs.knaw.nl). Bird feather fungi recorded in the current study belong to biosafety level BS-1, which is suitable for handling and has minimal potential hazard to laboratory personnel and the environment. Dynowska et al. (2013) reported potentially pathogenic yeasts belonging to BSL-1 and BSL-2 category which were isolated from throat and cloaca of Svalbard birds (little auk).
The prevalence and distribution of keratinolytic fungi largely depend on the amount of keratinic material present in the environment (Filipello Marchisio 1986; Ulfig and Ulfig 1990; Filipello Marchisio et al. 1991). The ecological conditions such as pH, temperature, or altitude reported to be less important because these fungi show a wide tolerance towards them (Böhme and Ziegler 1969; Piontelli and Caretta 1974; McAleer 1980; Ogbonna and Pugh 1987). Pugh and Evans (1970) suggested that feather fats play a large part in determining the occurrence of keratinophilic fungi in birds. The colonization of fungus on feathers in the Arctic may possibly be due to their preference for superficial feather fats. To arrive at such a conclusion, the composition of feather fatty acids needs to be examined. Furthermore, detailed studies on feather fungi in different areas of Arctic may provide an opportunity to learn the details of feather fungal flora and health condition of the birds. Similar such studies will help to establish precautionary measures when scientists handle birds for research purposes.
References
Aarnæs J-O (2002) Katalog over makro- og mikrosopp angitt for Norge og Svalbard [Catalogue of macro-and micromycetes recorded for Norway and Svalbard]. In Norwegian with an English summary. Synopsis Fungorum 16. Fungiflora A/S. Oslo, Norway
Barnett JA, Payne RW, Yarrow D (2000) Yeasts: characteristics and identification, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Barron GL (1977) The genera of Hyphomycetes from soil. Robert E. Krieger Publishing Huntington, New York
Bergero R, Girlanda M, Varese GC, Intili D, Luppi AM (1999) Psychrooligotrophic fungi from Arctic soils of Franz Joseph Land. Polar Biol 21:361–368
Böckle B, Galunsky B, Müller R (1995) Characterization of a keratinolytic serine proteinase from Streptomyces pactum DMS-40530. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:3705–3710
Böhme H, Ziegler H (1969) The distribution of geophilic dermatophytes and other keratinophilic fungi in relation to the ph of the soil. Mycopathol Mycol Appl 38:247–255
Buck JD (1983) Occurrence of Candida albicans in fresh gull feces in temperate and subtropical areas. Microb Ecol 9:171–176
Buck AM, Chabasse D (1998) Isolation of Candida albicans and halophilic Vibrio spp. from aquatic birds in Connecticut and Florida. Appl Environ Microb 56:826–828
Butinar L, Spencer-Martins I, Gunde-Cimerman N (2007) Yeasts in high Arctic glaciers: the discovery of a new habitat for eukaryotic microorganisms. A Van Leeuw J Microb 91:277–289
Butinar L, Strmole T, Gunde-Cimerman N (2011) Relative incidence of ascomycetous yeasts in arctic coastal environments. Microb Ecol 61:832–843
Buzzini P, Branda E, Goretti M, Turchetti B (2012) Psychrophilic yeasts from worldwide glacial habitats: diversity, adaptation strategies and biotechnological potential. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 82:217–241
Cafarchia C, Camarda A, Romito D, Campolo M, Quaglia NC, Tullio D, Otronto D (2006) Occurrence of yeasts in cloacae of migratory birds. Mycopathol 161:229–234
Callaghan TV, Björn LO, Chernov Y, Chapin T, Christensen TR, Huntley B, Ims RA et al (2004) Biodiversity, distributions and adaptations of Arctic species in the context of environmental change. Ambio 33:404–417
Carmichael JW, BryceKendrick W, Conners IL, Sigler L (1980) Genera of hyphomycetes. The University of Alberta Press, Canada
Connell L, Redman R, Craig S, Scorzetti G, Iszard M, Rodriguez R (2008) Diversity of soil yeasts isolated from South Victoria Land, Antarctica. Microb Ecol 56:448–459
Cooke RC, Whipps JM (1993) Ecophysiology of fungi. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Edinburgh
Czeczuga B, Godlewska A, Kiziewicz B (2004) Aquatic fungi growing on feathers of wild and domestic bird species in limnologically different water bodies. Pol J Environ Stud 131:21–31
de Gruyter J, Woudenberg JHC, Aveskamp MM, Verkley GJM, Groenewald JZ, Crous PW (2010) Systematic reappraisal of species in Phoma section Paraphoma, Pyrenochaeta and Pleurophoma. Mycologia 102:1066–1081
De Hoog GS, Gottlich E, Platas G, Genilloud O, Leotta G, van Brummelen J (2005) Evolution, taxonomy and ecology of the genus Thelebolus in Antarctica. Stud Mycol 51:33–76
De Vries GA (1962) Keratinophilic fungi and their action. A Van Leeuw J Microb 28:121–133
Del Frate G, Caretta G (1990) Fungi isolated from Antarctic material. Polar Biol 11:1–7
Dominik T, Inhatowicz A, Kopylow H, Mietkiewsky R (1973) Mycoflore of sand boxes in kindergardens in Szczecin. Ekol Pol 21:901–923
Domsch KH, Gams W, Anderson T-H (1980) Compendium of soil fungi. Academic Press, London
Dupont C, Carrier M, Higgins R (1994) Bacterial and fungal flora in healthy eyes of birds of prey. Can Vet J 35:699–701
Dynowska M, Kisicka I (2005a) Fungi isolated from selected birds potentially pathogenic to humans. Acta Mycol 40:141–147
Dynowska M, Kisicka I (2005b) Participation of birds in the circulation of pathogenic fungi descend from water environments: a case study of two species of Charadriiformes birds. Ecohydrol Hydrobiol 5:173–178
Dynowska M, Wojczulanis-Jakubas K, Pacynśka JA, Jakubas D, Ejdys E (2013) Potentially pathogenic yeast isolated from the throat and cloaca of an Arctic colonial seabird: the little auk (Alle alle). Polar Biol 36:343–348
Ellis MB (1971) Dematiaceous hyphomycetes. CMI, Kew
Ellis MB (1976) More dematiaceous hyphomycetes. CMI, Kew
Elvebakk A, Gjaerum HB, Sivertsen S (1996) Myxomycota, Oomycota, Chytridiomycota, Zygomycota, Ascomycota, Deuteromycota, Basidiomycota: Uredinales and Ustilaginales. In: Elvebakk A, Prestrud P (eds) A catalogue of Svalbard plants, fungi, algae and cyanobacteria. Part 4. Fungi II. Oslo, pp 207–259
Felsenstein J (1985) Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791
Filipello Marchisio V (1986) Keratinolytic and keratinophilic fungi of children’s sandpits in the city of Turin. Mycopathologia 94:163–172
Filipello Marchisio V (2000) Keratinophilic fungi: their role in nature and degradation of keratinic substrates. Revista Iberoamericana de Micología Apdo. 699, E-48080 Bilbao (Spain), pp 86–92
Filipello Marchisio V, Curetti V, Cassinelli C, Bordese C (1991) Keratinolytic and keratinophilic fungi in the soil of Papua New Guinea. Mycopathologia 115:113–120
Filipello Marchisio V, Fusconi A, Rigo S (1994) Keratinolysis and its morphological expression in hair digestion by airborne fungi. Mycopathologia 127:103–115
Friedrich J, Gradisar H, Mandin D, Chaumont JP (1999) Screening of fungi for synthesis of keratinolytic enzymes. Lett Appl Microbiol 28:127–130
Ghannuaum AM, Abu-Elteen KH (1990) Pathogenicity determinants of candida. Mycoses 33:265–282
Griffin DM (1960) Fungal colonization of sterile hair in contact with soil. Trans Br Mycol Soc 43:583–596
Gungnani HC, Sharma S, Gupta B (2012) Keratinophilic fungi recovered from feathers of different species of birds in St Kitts and Nevis. West Indian Med J 61:912–915
Hawksworth DL (1991) The fungal dimension of biodiversity: magnitude, significance, and conservation. Mycol Res 95:641–655
Holding AJ (1981) The microflora of tundra. In: Bliss LC, Heal OW, Moore JJ (eds) Tundra ecosystems: a comparative analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 561–585
Hoog GS (1996) Risk assessment of fungi reported from humans and animals. Mycoses 39:407–417
Hoshino T, Tojo M, Okada G, Kanda H, Ohgiya S, Ishizaki K (1999) A filamentous fungus, Pythium ultimum Throw var. ultimum, isolated from moribund moss colonies from Svalbard, northern island of Norway. Polar Biosci 12:68–75
IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Summary for policy makers. In: Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the inter-governmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Ivarson KC (1965) The microbiology of some permafrost soils in the McKenzie Valley. NWT Arctic 18:256–260
Karsten PF (1872) Fungi in insulis Spetsbergen et Beeren Eiland collecti. Öfvers. Kungliga Vetensk -Akad Förh 2:91–108
Kirk PM, Cannon PF, Minter DW, Stalpers JA (2008) Ainsworth and Bisby’s dictionary of the fungi, 10th edn. CABI Publishing, UK
Kunert J (1972) Keratin decomposition by dermatophytes: evidence of the sulphitolysis of the protein. Sabouraudia 10:1025–1026
Kurek E, Korniłowicz-Kowalska T, Słomka A, Melke J (2007) Characteristics of soil filamentous fungi communities isolated from various micro relief forms in the high Arctic tundra (Bellsund region, Spitsbergen). Polish Polar Res 28:57–73
Kurtzman CP, Fell JW, Boekhout T (2011) The yeasts, a taxonomic study, 5th edn. Elsevier, Tokyo
Kutty SN, Philip R (2008) Marine yeasts: a review. Yeast 25:465–483
Kytöviita MM (2005) Asymmetric symbiont adaptation to Arctic conditions could explain why high Arctic plants are non-mycorrhizal. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 53:27–32
Lehninger AL (1984) Biochimica. Bologna, Zanichelli
Majchrowicz I, Dominik T (1969) Further contribution to the knowledge of keratinolytic and keratinophilic soil fungi of the region of Szczecin—Keratinolytic and keratinophilic fungi in the immediate surroundings of cattle. Ekol Pol 17:87–116
Malviya HK, Rajak RC, Hasija SK (1992) Purification and partial characterization of extracellular keratinases of Scopulariopsis brevicaulis. Mycopathologia 119:161–165
Mancianti F, Nardoni S, Ceccherelli R (2002) Occurrence of yeasts in psittacines droppings from captive birds in Italy. Mycopathol 153:121–124
Mandeel Q, Nardoni S, Mancianti F (2011) Keratinophilic fungi on feathers of common clinically healthy birds in Bahrain. Mycoses 54:71–77
McAleer R (1980) Investigation of keratinophilic fungi from soil in Western-Australia: a preliminary survey. Mycopathologia 72:155–166
Miljković B, Pavlovski Z, Jovičić D, Radanović O, Kureljušić B (2011) Fungi on feathers of common clinically healthy birds in Belgrade. Biotech Anim Husbandry 27:45–54
Nygaard EJ (2009) Ny-Ålesund, International Arctic Research and Monitoring Station at 79°N. Kings Bay AS, Ny-Ålesund
Ogbonna CIC, Pugh GJF (1987) Keratinophilic fungi from Nigerian soil. Mycopathologia 99:115–118
Ozerskaya S, Kochkina G, Ivanushkina N, Gilichinsky DA (2009) Fungi in permafrost. In: Margesin R (ed) Permafrost soils. Soil Biology 16. Springer, Berlin, pp 85–95
Pang KL, Chiang MW, Vrijmoed LLP (2008) Havispora longyearbyenensis gen. et sp. nov.: an arctic marine fungus from Svalbard, Norway. Mycologia 100:291–295
Pang KL, Chiang MW, Vrijmoed LLP (2009) Remispora spitsbergenensis sp. nov., a marine lignicolous ascomycete from Svalbard, Norway. Mycologia 101:531–534
Pathan AAK, Bhadra B, Begum Z, Shivaji S (2009) Diversity of yeasts from puddles in the vicinity of Midre Lovénbreen glacier, Arctic and bioprospecting for enzymes and fatty acids. Curr Microbiol 60:307–314
Peay KG, Kennedy PG, Bruns TD (2008) Fungal community ecology: a hybrid beast with a molecular master. Bioscience 58:799–810
Piontelli E, Caretta G (1974) Considerazioni ecologiche su alcuni geomiceti isolati su substrati cheratinici in località montagnose delle Ande del Cile. Rivista Patol Veg 10:261–314
Pitt JI (1979) The genus Penicillium and its teleomorphic states Eupenicillium and Talaromyces. Academic Press, London
Pugh GJF, Evans MD (1970) Keratinophilic fungi associated with birds. II. Physiological studies. Trans Br Mycoi Soc 54:241–250
Rapper KB, Fennell DI (1965) The Aspergillus. The Williams & Wilkins Company, Baltimore
Reeve JN, Christner BC, Kvitko BH, Mosley-Thompson E, Thompson LG (2002) Life in glacial ice (Abstract). In: Rossi M, Bartolucci S, Ciaramella M, Moracci M (eds) Extremophiles 2002. 4th international congress on extremophiles, September 2002, Naples, Italy 27, pp 22–26
Robinson CH (2001) Cold adaptation in Arctic and Antarctic fungi. New Phytol 151:341–353
Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425
Samson RA, Frisvad JC (2004) Penicillium Subgenus Penicillium: new taxonomic schemes, mycotoxins and other extrolites. Stud Mycol 49:1–251
Säwström C, Mumford P, Marshall W, Hodson A, Laybourn-Parry J (2002) The microbial communities and primary productivity of cryoconite holes in an Arctic glacier (Svalbard 79°N). Polar Biol 25:591–596
Schneider R (1979) Die Gattung Pyrenochaeta De Notaris. Mitt Biol Bundesanst Land Forstw 189:1–73
Singh P, Singh SM (2012) Characterization of yeast and filamentous fungi isolated from cryoconite holes of Svalbard, Arctic. Polar Biol 35:575–583
Singh SM, Singh PN, Singh SK, Sharma PK (2014) Pigment, fatty acid and extracellular enzyme analysis of a fungal strain Thelebolus microsporus from Larsemann Hills, Antarctica. Polar Rec 50:31–36
Singh SM, Singh SK, Yadav L, Singh PN, Ravindra R (2012) Filamentous soil fungi from Ny-Ålesund, Spitsbergen, and screening for extracellular enzymes. Arctic 65:35–55
Singh P, Tsuji M, Singh SM, Roy U, Hoshino T (2013) Taxonomic characterization, adaptation strategies and biotechnological potential of cryophilic yeasts from ice cores of Midre Lovénbreen glacier, Svalbard, Arctic. Cryobiology 66:167–175
Sjolund M, Bonnedahl J, Hernandez J, Bengtsson S, Cederbrant G, Pinhassi J, Kahlmeter G, Olsen B (2008) Dissemination of multidrug-resistant bacteria into the Arctic. Emerg Infect Dis 14:70–72
Takiuchi I, Sei I, Takagi H, Negi M (1984) Partial characterization of the extracellular keratinase from Microsporum canis. J Med Vet Mycol 22:219–224
Tamura K, Nei M (1993) Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol Biol Evol 10:512–526
Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol. doi:10.1093/molbev/msr121
Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S (2013) MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol. doi:10.1093/molbev/mst197
Thomas-Hall SR, Turchetti B, Buzzini P, Branda E, Boekhout T, Theelen B, Watson K (2010) Cold-adapted yeasts from Antarctica and the Italian Alps-description of three novel species: Mrakia robertii sp. nov., Mrakia blollopis sp. nov. and Mrakiella niccombsii sp. nov. Extremophiles 14:47–59
Tsiodras S, Kelesidis T, Kelesidis I, Bauchinger V, Falagas ME (2008) Human infections associated with wild birds. J Infect 56:83–98
Tsuji M, Fujiu S, Xiao N, Hanada Y, Kudoh S, Kondo H, Tsuda S, Hoshino T (2013a) Cold adaptation of fungi obtained from soil and lake sediment in the Skarvsnes ice-free area, Antarctica. FEMS Microbiol Lett 346:121–130
Tsuji M, Goshima T, Matsushika A, Kudoh S, Hoshino T (2013b) Direct ethanol fermentation from lignocellulosic biomass by Antarctic basidiomycetous yeast Mrakia blollopis under a low temperature condition. Cryobiology 67:241–243
Ulfig K, Ulfig A (1990) Keratinophilic fungi in bottom sediments of surface waters. J Med Vet Mycol 28:261–268
Wawrzkiewicz K, Wolski T, Lobarzewski J (1991) Screening the keratinolytic activity of dermatophytes in vitro. Mycopathologia 114:1–8
Wojczulanis-Jakubas K, Dynowska M, Jakubas D (2011) Fungi prevalence in breeding pairs of monogamous seabird: little auk, Alle alle. Ethol Ecol Evol 23:240–247
Yu RJ, Harmon SR, Blank F (1969) Hair digestion by a keratinase of Trichophyton mentagrophytes. J Invest Dermatol 5:166–171
Acknowledgments
Authors are thankful to Directors NCAOR—India, NIPR—Japan, AIST—Japan, Arctic Centre, University of Groningen and King Bay—Norway for facilities. Authors are also thankful to Mr. Gary Stanley Fernandes and Dr. Dominique Paré, Consorminex Inc. (Canada), for English corrections. The publication compliance with Ethical Standards of journal of Polar Biology. This is NCAOR Publication no. 31/2015.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Singh, S.M., Tsuji, M., Gawas-Sakhalker, P. et al. Bird feather fungi from Svalbard Arctic. Polar Biol 39, 523–532 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-015-1804-y
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00300-015-1804-y