Abstract
A molecular electron density theory study is presented for [3 + 2] cycloaddition (32CA) reactions of 2,2-dimethyl-1-pyrroline-1-oxide with the nitrile functions to analyse the mechanism and experimentally observed regioselectivity. Electron localisation function (ELF) study predicts zwitter-ionic character of the cyclic nitrone, allowing its participation in zw-type 32CA reactions associated with high energy barrier demanding overcome through appropriate electrophilic–nucleophilic interactions. Analysis of the CDFT indices predict the global electronic flux from the strong nucleophilic nitrone to the electrophilic nitrile functions. These 32CA reactions are endergonic with reactions Gibbs free energies between 5.5 and 39.2 \(\text{kcal}{\cdot}\text{mol}^{-1}\) in toluene. The ortho regiochemical pathway is preferred owing to the higher thermodynamic stability of the 2,3-dihydro-1,2,4-oxadiazole derivatives. The 32CA reaction of the nitrile function with carbomethoxy substituent is more facile relative to that with the phenyl substituent. Bonding evolution theory study predicts one-step mechanism with early TSs for the ortho pathway, while a one-step-two-stage mechanism is predicted for the meta reaction path, in conformity with the ELF and AIM topological studies at the TSs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
The nitrile (C≡N) function represents an excellent candidate for [3 + 2] cycloaddition (32CA) reactions to open up useful synthetic pathways for several heteroaromatic compounds. However, the limited applicability of nitriles in 32CA reactions is attributed to their lower reactivity in these reactions relative to other triple bonded reacting functions [1,2,3,4]. Nitriles demand a strong electron acceptor substituent to react with acyclic nitrones, while methyl cyanide remains inert to such 32CA reactions even under drastic conditions [1,2,3]. Hermkens and coworkers performed detailed experimental studies to outline the scope of nitrone-nitrile 32CA reactions, while Eguchi et al. designed the remarkable reactivity of acetonitrile with 4-azahomoadamant-4-ene-N–oxide and cyclic nitrones leading to 2,3-dihydro-1,2,4-oxadiazole derivatives (Scheme 1) [2, 5,6,7].
Since the last two decades, computational chemistry has emerged as an important tool to analyse the experimentally observed reactivity and selectivity outcomes by developing a systematic outline of the mechanism of chemical reactions [8]. However, in spite of the ever-increasing modern applications of the computational science in chemistry, the underlying theories of organic chemistry had not experienced major breakthrough since last 40 years, until in 2016 Domingo proposed the molecular electron density theory (MEDT) to recognise the decisive role of electron density changes in the molecular reactivity [9, 10]. Since last 4 years, MEDT has successfully analysed the experimental outcome of several 32CA reactions [10,11,12]. Recently, we have applied the MEDT concept to analyse the experimental outcome of strain promoted and catalysed 32CA reactions and the observed chemo-, regio- and stereoselectivite synthesis of spiroisoxazolines [13,14,15,16,17].
Within the MEDT framework, the three atom components (TACs) participating in the 32CA reactions are classified by characterising their electronic structure, into pseudodiradical, pseudo(mono)radical, carbenoid and zwitter-ionic type, which enables their respective participation in pdr- type, pmr-type, cb-type and zw-type 32CA reactions [10, 11]. These 32CA reactions show different reactivity profiles; the pdr-type 32CA reactions are associated with lower energy barrier and take place easily, while the zw-type 32CA reactions show high energy barrier, demanding overcome through electrophilic–nucleophilic interaction between the reactants [16].
The 32CA reactions of acyclic nitrones with the nitrile function were theoretically studied by Wagner et al. and Kuznetsov et al. in 2003 [18, 19]. However, neither of these studies have addressed the mechanistic differences in the feasible reaction paths and the role of electron density flux on the substituent effects of nitrone-nitrile 32CA reactions.
Herein, we present an MEDT study at the B3LYP/6-311 ++G(d,p) level for 32CA reactions of a cyclic nitrone, 2,2-dimethyl-1-pyrroline-1-oxide 1 with nitriles 2 and 3 bearing carbomethoxy and phenyl substituents, experimentally realised by Eguchi and coworkers (see Scheme 2) [5]. These 32CA reactions are completely regioselective leading to 2,3-dihydro-1,2,4-oxadiazole derivatives.
We have presented this MEDT study in six Sects. 3.1–3.6 (1); in Sect. 3.1, the topological analysis of the electron localisation function (ELF) at the ground state structures of the reagents 1–3 is performed to represent their electronic structure and consequently to assess their reactivity in 32CA reactions [20, 21]. (2) in Sect. 3.2, reactivity indices defined within the conceptual density functional theory (CDFT) are analysed to comprehend the polarity of the 32CA reactions [22, 23]. (3) in Sect. 3.3, potential energy surfaces (PES) [24] along the feasible regioisomeric channels of the 32CA reactions are studied to predict the energy profiles and the global electron density transfer (GEDT) is calculated at the TSs [25]. (4) in Sect. 3.4, the conjunction of ELF with Thom’s catastrophe, namely the bonding evolution theory (BET) proposed by Krokidis, is used to structure the mechanism and determine the energy cost (EC) for electron density changes along the regioisomeric paths [20, 21, 26, 27]. (5) in Sect. 3.5, the ELF of the located TSs is analysed; (6) in Sect. 3.6, the nature of interatomic interactions at the reacting centres of the TSs is analysed by the topological analysis of the AIM proposed by Bader et al. [28, 29].
2 Computational methods
The Berny analytical gradient optimisation method was employed at the B3LYP/6-311 ++G(d,p) level for the optimisation of the stationary points along the potential energy surface of the 32CA reactions [30, 31]. The use of B3LYP functional has been justified as a reliable and accurate method in the analysis of several recent 32CA reactions [32,33,34,35].
Frequency calculations at the optimised TSs confirmed the presence of one imaginary frequency, while the absence of imaginary frequency was verified for the local minimum. Intrinsic Reaction coordinate (IRC) calculations using Gonzales–Schlegal integration method were carried out to verify the minimum energy reaction pathway connecting the reactants and products via the located TSs [36,37,38].
Solvent effects in toluene were considered using polarizable continuum model (PCM) by modelling the solvent using self-consistent reaction field (SCRF) method [39,40,41,42,43].
The CDFT indices are calculated using equation reviewed in Reference 23 [22, 23]. The global electron density theory (GEDT) at the TSs of each reacting framework was calculated from natural population analysis (NPA) as follows [25, 44, 45]:
where q represents the atomic charges, the summation of charges on all atoms in the considered framework represents the GEDT, the positive sign of GEDT indicating global electronic flux from that framework to the other.
Topological analysis of the ELF at the reagents [20, 21], TSs and IRC points and calculation of Quantum Theory of Atoms-in Molecules (QTAIM) parameters [28, 29] are calculated using Multiwfn software [46] and the isosurfaces are visualised using UCSF Chimera software [47]. Gaussian 16 package has been used for all calculations [48].
3 Results and discussion
3.1 ELF topological analysis of nitrone 1, and nitriles 2 and 3
In 1990, Becke and Edgecombe constructed the ELF concept, which was illustrated in 1994 by Silvi and Savin to propose a quantitative connection between the electron density distribution and the chemical structure of molecules [20, 21]. Under the MEDT framework, a reasonably good correlation has been established between the electronic structure of three atom components (TACs) and their reactivity in 32CA reactions [9,10,11].
Herein, the ELF of the ground state structures of the reagents 1–3 is studied to represent their electronic structures and reactivity in 32CA reactions. Table 1 lists the significant ELF valence basin populations of nitrone 1 and the nitriles 2 and 3, while the ELF localisation domains are shown in Fig. 1. Based on the ELF valence populations, the Lewis structures of the reagents are proposed and are given in Fig. 2.
The ELF of nitrone 1 shows two monosynaptic basins, V(O1) and V’(O1) integrating 5.91 e, one disynaptic basin V(C3,N2) integrating 3.84 e and one disynaptic basin V(N2,O1) integrating 1.41 e, which are associated with the non-bonding electron density on O1 oxygen, underpopulated C3–N2 double bond and underpopulated N2–O1 single bond, respectively.
The ELF of nitriles 2 and 3 shows one monosynaptic basin V(N4) integrating 3.13 e (2) and 3.22 e (3), associated with non-bonding electron density on N4 nitrogen atom and disynaptic basins for the C5–N4 bonding region with total integrating populations of 4.50 e (2) and 4.40 e (3), associated with the underpopulated C5–N4 triple bond.
After establishing the bonding pattern of the reagents, the atomic charge distribution of nitrone 1 and nitriles 2 and 3 was analysed through NPA (Fig. 2) [44, 45]. O1 oxygen atom of nitrone 1 is negatively charged (− 0.541 e). C3 carbon shows charge of 0.019 e, while N2 nitrogen is positively charged (0.060 e).
This suggests charge separation in the nitrone although differing from the charges expected by the Lewis’s bonding model. Although nitrone 1 is classified as a “zwitterionic” TAC from ELF study, this terminology is not synonymous to the dipolar electronic structure of the nitrones. Instead, it indicates the specific bonding pattern (considering no charges) of the resonance Lewis structure represented by Huisgen for “1,3-dipoles” [49].
In the nitriles 2 and 3, nitrogen N4 shows negative charge values − 0.255 (2) and − 0.312 (3), while C4 bearing positive charge 0.204 (2) and 0.289 (3), indicating the influence of electronically biased carbomethoxy (2) and phenyl (3) substituents of the nitrile functions.
3.2 Analysis of the CDFT indices of nitrone 1, and nitriles 2 and 3
The concept of “Conceptual DFT”, originated from the pioneering work of Parr, has been utilised in several studies to assess the chemical reactivity of structures participating in 32CA reactions [22, 23, 50,51,52,53]. Reactivity indices defined within the conceptual DFT, namely the CDFT indices, have well documented literature and provide an initial comprehension of the molecular reactivity by addressing the chemical behaviour of the reactants [23]. Domingo defined the standard scales for electrophilicity and nucleophilicity indices at the B3LYP/6-31G(d) level, which has therefore been employed herein for the CDFT analysis [54, 55]. Consequently, the CDFT indices, electronic chemical potential, μ, chemical hardness, ɳ, electrophilicity, ω, and nucleophilicity, N, at the ground state of nitrone 1, and nitriles 2 and 3, are listed in Table 2 [56,57,58,59].
The electronic chemical potentials μ of nitrone 1, μ = − 2.83 eV (1) are higher than that of nitriles 2 (μ = − 5.36 eV) and 3 (μ = − 4.31 eV), suggesting that along the 32CA reaction, the electron density will flux from nitrone 1 to the nitriles 2 and 3 [23, 56].
The electrophilicity ω index and the nucleophilicity N index of nitrone 1 is 0.73 and 3.54 eV, respectively, being classified as a weak electrophile and a strong nucleophile on the respective scales [54, 55, 58, 59]. The nitriles 2 and 3, with electrophilicity indices ω = 2.15 eV (2) and ω = 1.59 eV (3) are classified as strong electrophiles and with nucleophilicity indices N = 0.41 eV (2) and N = 1.88 eV (3) as weak nucleophiles. Note that the replacement of the carbomethoxy substituent in 2 by phenyl in 3, decreases the electrophilicity of the nitrile, suggesting a more feasible electrophilic–nucleophilic interaction in the 32CA reaction between 1 and 2, relative to that between 1 and 3. Consequently, along these zw-type 32CA reactions the nitriles 2 and 3 will behave as electrophiles, while nitrone 1 will behave as a nucleophile, in conformity with the electronic chemical potentials μ of these species.
3.3 Analysis of the energy profile associated with the 32CA reactions of nitrone 1 with nitriles 2 and 3
Due to non-symmetry of the nitrile functional, two regioisomeric paths, namely the ortho and meta (see Scheme 3), are feasible for these 32CA reactions. The ortho reaction path is associated with the formation of O1–C5 and C3–N4 bonds, while the meta channel with the formation of O1–N4 and C3–C5 bonds. The stationary points along these two reactions paths were located and characterised, the reagents, nitrone 1, nitriles 2 and 3, two TSs for each 32CA reaction, TS1, TS2, TS3 and TS4 and the corresponding adducts 4–7, respectively, for the 32CA reactions of nitrone 1 with 2 and 3. TS1 and TS3 correspond to the ortho TSs leading to 2,3-dihydro-1,2-4-oxadiazoles 4 and 6, while TS2 and TS4 are the meta TSs leading to 2,3-dihydro-1,2-5-oxadiazoles 5 and 7, respectively. The relative Gibbs free energies at the stationary points are given in Scheme 4, while the relative energy, enthalpy and entropies are given in Table S3 of the Supplementary Information. The absolute energy, enthalpy, free energy and entropies of the stationary states are given in Table S1 and Table S2 of the Supplementary Information.
The energy profile of the 32CA reactions was studied to arrive at some important conclusions (1) These 32CA reactions show positive reaction Gibbs free energies, ∆G of 3.4 (4), 29.0 (5), 6.1 (6) and 36.3 (7) in gas phase and 5.5 (4), 31.0 (5), 9.4 (6) and 39.2 (7) in toluene, suggesting endergonic reaction, demanding the analysis of the thermodynamic stability of the cycloadducts to predict the preferred regiochemical path. Along the ortho channel, the reaction enthalpies are − 10.5 (4) and − 8.5 (6) kcal·mol−1 in gas phase and − 8.6 (4) and 5.0 (6) kcal·mol−1 in toluene, while along the meta reaction path, the products show positive reaction enthalpies 14.7 (5) and 21.9 (7) kcal·mol−1 in gas phase and 16.7 (5) and 24.9 (7) kcal·mol−1 in toluene. Thus, the ortho adducts show higher relative stability than the meta ones owing to their negative reaction enthalpies and lower reaction free energies, suggesting preference for the ortho reaction path leading to 2,3-dihydro-1,2,4-oxadiazoles, in complete agreement with the experimental studies [5, 6]. (2) These 32CA reactions show activation free energies between 28.8 (TS1) and 49.2 (TS4) in gas phase and between 30.5 (TS1) and 50.5 (TS4) in toluene, in coherence with their zw-type classification associated with high activation parameters. (3) the inclusion of toluene increases the activation free energies by 1.3-2.7 \(\text{kcal}{\cdot}\text{mol}^{-1}\) due to better solvation of the reagents than the TSs, while the reaction free energies are increased by 2.0–3.3 \(\text{kcal}{\cdot}\text{mol}^{-1}\) in toluene [60] (3) the activation enthalpy for 32CA reaction of nitrone 1 with 2 via TS1 is lowered by that for the 32CA reaction of nitrone 1 with 3 via TS3 by 4.8 \(\text{kcal}{\cdot}\text{mol}^{-1}\) in gas phase and by 6.0 \(\text{kcal}{\cdot}\text{mol}^{-1}\) in toluene. The reaction enthalpy of the ortho adduct 4 obtained from the 32CA reaction of nitrone 1 with 2 is stabilized by 2 \(\text{kcal}{\cdot}\text{mol}^{-1}\) in gas phase and by 3.6 \(\text{kcal}{\cdot}\text{mol}^{-1}\) in toluene relative to the ortho adduct 6 obtained from the 32CA reaction of nitrone 1 with 3, in agreement with the experimental studies, showing slower 32CA reactions with nitrile 3 relative to that with 2.
Thermal corrections to the electronic energies give the relative enthalpies in gas phase and toluene. The activation enthalpies increase by 0.5–0.9 \(\text{kcal}{\cdot}\text{mol}^{-1}\) in gas phase and by 0.4–0.8 \(\text{kcal}{\cdot}\text{mol}^{-1}\) in toluene relative to the activation energies, while reaction enthalpies decrease by 1.9–2.5 \(\text{kcal}{\cdot}\text{mol}^{-1}\) in gas phase and toluene relative to the reaction energies. Inclusion of the entropies to enthalpies strongly increases the activation Gibbs energies by 13.3–13.6 \(\text{kcal}{\cdot}\text{mol}^{-1}\) in gas phase and toluene, while the reaction Gibbs energies show decrease by 13.9–14.6 \(\text{kcal}{\cdot}\text{mol}^{-1}\) in gas phase and 14.1–14.4 \(\text{kcal}{\cdot}\text{mol}^{-1}\) in toluene. The activation Gibbs free energy of 4 becomes 28.8 \(\text{kcal}{\cdot}\text{mol}^{-1}\) in gas phase and 30.5 \(\text{kcal}{\cdot}\text{mol}^{-1}\) in toluene, the 32CA reaction of 1 with 2 being endergonic by 3.4 \(\text{kcal}{\cdot}\text{mol}^{-1}\) in gas phase and 5.5 \(\text{kcal}{\cdot}\text{mol}^{-1}\) in toluene.
The B3LYP/6-311 ++G(d,p) optimised geometries of the TSs are given in Fig. 3. In gas phase, the distances between O1 and C5, and C3 and N4 interacting centres at the ortho TSs are: 1.803 and 2.011 Å, at TS1 and 1.864 and 2.006 Å, at TS3, while the distances between O1 and N5, and C3 and C4 interacting centres at the meta TSs are: 2.135 and 1.744 Å, at TS2 and 2.136 and 1.784 Å, at TS4, respectively. The TSs geometries show similar trend and minimal changes on inclusion of solvent effects in toluene. These geometrical parameters imply the extent of bond formation. (1) Considering that the C–O and C-N bond formation begins at the distances of 1.70–1.79 and 1.90–1.80 Å, respectively, these geometrical parameters indicate that at the ortho TSs TS1 and TS3, the formation of the C–O or C–N single bonds has not yet begun [10]. (2) Considering that the C–C bond formation begins at the distances of 1.90 Å, it is evident that at the meta TSs TS2 and TS4, the formation of the C–C single covalent bond has already started; however, the formation of N–O bond has not yet begun, owing to the O1–N5 distance being greater than 2.00 Å.
Finally, the polar nature of these 32CA reactions was evaluated by the GEDT calculations at the TSs [25]. The gas phase GEDT values at the TSs are 0.11 e at TS1, 0.17 e at TS2, 0.06 e at TS3, and 0.14 e at TS4. In toluene, the GEDT values at the TSs are 0.13 e at TS1, 0.17 e at TS2, 0.07 e at TS3, and 0.14 e at TS4. The electron density fluxes from nitrone 1 acting as the nucleophile towards nitriles 2 and 3 in each case, these reactions are classified as forward electron density flux (FEDF), evidenced by the higher nucleophilicity of nitrone 1 relative to the strongly electrophilic nitriles 2 and 3 (see Table 2) [61]. The higher GEDT values associated with the 32CA reaction of nitrone 1 with 2 relative to that with 3 accounts for the higher polar character and lower activation energy of the 32CA reaction with 2. Note that, the unfavourable meta TSs with higher activation energies leading to less stable cycloadducts show higher GEDT values compared to the ortho TSs, owing to the dependence of the GEDT on three factors—the nucleophilicity and the electrophilicity of the reagents, and the distance between the two frameworks, the more unfavourable regioisomeric meta TS is more energetic and more advanced, which makes the GEDT higher at these TSs [25, 62].
3.4 Mechanistic implications along the regioisomeric channels of 32CA reaction of nitrone 1 with nitrile 2 from bonding evolution theory (BET) study
The bonding evolution theory (BET), proposed by Krokoidis, provides mechanistic implications along a reaction path by exploring the sequential bonding changes from the conjunction of the ELF topological analysis and Thoms catastrophe theory [20, 21, 26, 27]. For the 32CA reaction of nitrone 1 with nitrile 2, the bonding pattern along the ortho and meta regioisomeric paths has been established from detailed BET study.
The ELF basin populations at the reacting centres for the 32CA reaction of nitrone 1 with nitrile 2 along the ortho regioisomeric path and the proposed sequential bonding changes are given in Scheme 5. The identification of catastrophe from ELF basin analysis allows characterising six topological phases I, II, III, IV, V and VI, identified by the starting points P1-I, P2-I, P3-I, P4-I, P5-I and P6-I, respectively (Scheme 5).
The ELF topology of the starting point P1-I shows similar bonding pattern as the individual reagents (see Table 1). At P2-I, (d(C3–N4) = 2.222 Å, d(O1–C5) = 2.050 Å)), the monosynaptic basin V(N2) associated with the N2 nitrogen lone pair integrating 0.19 e is created by deriving electron density from the C3–N2 bonding region experiencing depopulation from 3.81 e at P1-I to 3.06 e at P2-I. Phases III and IV are, respectively, characterised by the creation of pseudoradical centres at C3 and C5, respectively, at P3-I and P4-I showing formation of monosynaptic basins V(C5) and V(C3) integrating 0.17 e and 0.21 e. Note that C5–N1 bonding region experiences depopulation from 3.96 e at P3-I to 3.79 e at P4-I, while the C3–N2 bonding region experiences depopulation from 2.66 e at P3-I to 2.37 e at P4-I. The transition structure TS1 belongs to phase III. The energy cost (EC) for formation of pseudoradical centres at C5 and C3 and the lone pair electron density at N2 nitrogen corresponds to 98.6% of the activation energy. Note that at the TS, the formation of O1–C5 and C3–N4 covalent bonds has not begun, which agrees with the topological analysis of the AIM discussed in Sect. 3.6. In phase V, identified by the IRC point P5-I, the first O1–C5 single bond formation begins at the O1–C5 distance of 1.607 Å, characterised by the creation of disynaptic basin V(O1, C5) integrating 0.89 e, while in phase VI, identified by the IRC point P6-I, the second C3–N4 single bond formation begins at the C3–N4 distance of 1.793 Å, characterised by the creation of disynaptic basin V(C3,N4) integrating 1.15 e. Finally, at the cycloadduct 4, the molecular geometry is relaxed at O1–C5 and C3–N4 distances of 1.361 and 1.463 Å, respectively.
The ELF basin populations at the reacting centres for the 32CA reaction of nitrone 1 with nitrile 2 along the meta regioisomeric path, and the sequential bonding changes are represented in Scheme 6. The identification of catastrophe from ELF basin analysis allows characterising seven topological phases I, II, III, IV, V, VI and VII, identified by the starting points P1-II, P2-II, P3-II, P4-II, P5-II, P6-II and P7-II, respectively (Scheme 6).
The ELF topology of the starting point P1-II shows similar bonding pattern as the individual reagents (see Table 1). At P2-II, (d(C3–C5) = 2.256 Å, d(O1–N4) = 2.388 Å)), the monosynaptic basin V(C3) integrating 0.31 e is created by deriving electron density from the C3–N2 bonding region, which shows depopulation from 3.83 e at P1-II to 3.46 e at P2-II. Phases III and IV are, respectively, characterised by the creation of pseudoradical centres at C5 and lone pair at N2 nitrogen, respectively, at P3-II and P4-II showing formation of monosynaptic basins V(C5) and V(N2) integrating 0.50 e and 0.71 e. Note that C5–N4 bonding region is depopulated from 4.19 e at P2-II to 3.96 e at P3-II, while the C3–N2 bonding region experiences depopulation from 3.43 e at P3-II to 2.71 e at P4-II.
In phase V, identified by the IRC point P5-II, the first C3-C5 single bond formation begins at the C3-C5 distance of 1.788 Å, characterised by the creation of disynaptic basin V(C3,C5) integrating 1.55 e. The energy cost (EC) for the creation of lone pair electron density at N2 nitrogen and formation of C3–C5 single bond corresponds to 100% of the activation energy. The transition structure TS2 belongs to phase V. Note that at the TS, the formation of C3–C5 covalent bond has begun, also indicated by the negative Laplacian of electron density in the AIM topological analysis discussed in Sect. 3.6. In phase VI, identified by the IRC point P6-II, there is creation of monosynaptic basins V’’’(O1) and V’(N4), integrating at 0.23 e and 0.27 e, respectively, associated with the lone pair electron density at the O1 oxygen and N4 nitrogen. Finally, in phase VII, at P7-II, the second O1–N4 single bond formation begins at the O1–N4 distance of 1.484 Å, characterised by the creation of disynaptic basin V(O1,N4) integrating 0.97 e. The molecular geometry is finally relaxed at C3–C5 and O1–N4 distances of 1.514 and 1.475 Å, respectively, in the cycloadduct 5. Note that the formation of the second O1–N4 begins when the total integrating population of disynaptic basin V(C3,C5) has reached 2.01 e. Thus, the one-step two-stage mechanism is predicted for the meta reaction path.
A comparative analysis of the BET of the ortho and meta reaction paths for 32CA reaction of nitrone 1 with nitrile 2 allows arriving at some important conclusions (1) Along the ortho reaction path, the lone pair electron density is created at N2 nitrogen in the first phase, while in the meta reaction path, the pseudoradical centres at C3 and C5 demanded for the formation of the new C3–C5 bond are created in the first two phases. The total integrating population of V(C5) and V(C3) basins at the starting points are 0.21 e and 0.17 e, while the respective populations along the meta reaction paths are 0.31 e and 0.50 e. These observations predict more advanced C3–C5 bond formation at the meta reaction path, consequently leading to increase in GEDT at P2-II (0.15 e) and P3-II (0.18 e) associated with the meta reaction path compared to P3-I (0.13 e) and P4-I (0.10 e) associated with the ortho reaction path. (2) At the ortho TS1, the formation of no new covalent single bond has begun, while at the meta TS2 shows formation of new C3–C5 single bond. (3) Although the meta reaction path is more advanced relative to the ortho reaction path, the EC demanded at IRC points P2-II, P3-II and P4-II associated with the meta reaction path are higher than that demanded by the IRC points P2-I, P3-I and P4-I associated with the ortho reaction path by 6.9, 6.9 and 8.1 \(\text{kcal}{\cdot}\text{mol}^{-1}\), resulting in the increased activation energy barrier of TS2 relative to TS1 by 10.4 \(\text{kcal}{\cdot}\text{mol}^{-1}\). (4) These 32CA reactions show positive relative Gibbs free energies, suggesting endergonic character, and hence the decisive role of the relative energies of the cycloadducts in the product composition. Along the ortho and meta reaction channels, the BET studies suggest relaxation of the molecular geometries in phase VII at the cycloadducts 4 and 5 with relative energies − 13.0 and 12.6 \(\text{kcal}{\cdot}\text{mol}^{-1}\), which clearly indicates the preferred formation of ortho adduct 4, in agreement with the experimental outcome.
3.5 ELF topological analysis at the TSs
The ELF valence basin populations at the four TSs, TS1, TS2, TS3 and TS4 are listed in Table 3, while the ELF localisation domains are represented in Fig. 4. ELF of the ortho TSs, TS1 and TS3 show the presence of monosynaptic V(N2) and V(C5) basins integrating 1.66 e and 0.23–0.24 e, which are absent in the ELF of nitrone 1. The disynaptic V(C3,N2) basin in nitrone 1 associated with the C3-N2 bonding region integrating 3.84 e in nitrone 1 is depopulated to 2.62 e in TS1, 2.11 e in TS2, 2.62 e in TS3 and 2.17 e in TS4. The disynaptic V(N4,C5) basin in the nitriles associated with the N4–C5 bonding region integrating 4.50 e (2) and 4.40 e (3) in the nitriles is depopulated to 3.87 e in TS1, 3.59 e in TS2, 3.80 e in TS3 and 3.57 e in TS4. At the ortho TSs, the formation of new single covalent bond has not been started, while at the meta TSs, the presence of disynaptic basin V(C3,C5) integrating 1.62 e (TS2) and 1.59 e (TS4) suggests that the formation of C3–C5 single bond has been started at TS2 and TS4.
3.6 QTAIM topological analysis at TSs
The nature of interactions at the interatomic reacting centres of the TSs was evaluated from the topological analysis of the AIM proposed by Bader and coworkers [28, 29]. The bond critical points CP1, for the newly formed O1–C5 (TS1, TS3) and O1–N4 (TS2, TS4) bonds, and CP2, for the newly formed C3–N4 (TS1, TS3) and C3–C5 (TS2, TS4) bonds are represented in Scheme 7, while the electron density ρ, the Laplacian of electron density, \(\nabla_{{\rho (r_{c} )}}^{2}\) and the energy density \(E_{{\rho (r_{c} )}}\) at CP1 and CP2 are given in Table 4. At the ortho and meta TSs, CP1 shows positive Laplacian of electron density and low electron density, suggesting that the formation of O1–C5 or O1–N4 covalent bonds has not been started at the TSs, the observation being in conformity with the ELF study showing absence of disynaptic basins V(O1,C5) or V(O1,N4) at the TSs (Sect. 3.5). At the ortho TSs, TS1 and TS3, CP2 shows positive Laplacian of electron density and low electron density, suggesting that the formation of C3–N4 covalent bonds has not been started at these TSs. However, CP2 corresponding to the formation of new C3–C5 single bonds at the meta TSs TS2 and TS4 shows negative Laplacian of electron density and value of calculated electron density ρ > 0.1 au, which indicates covalent bonding between C3 and C5, in complete agreement with the ELF study showing the presence of disynaptic basins V(C3,C5) at these TSs (Sect. 3.5).
4 Conclusion
An MEDT study is presented for 32CA reaction of a 2,2-dimethyl-1-pyrroline-1-oxide 1 to nitriles 2 and 3 at the B3LYP/6-311 ++G(d,p) computational level.
The ELF topological analysis at the ground state structures allows classification of the nitrone 1 as a zwitter-ionic TAC, allowing its participation in zw-type 32CA reactions, demanding appropriate electrophilic–nucleophilic interactions. Nitriles 2 and 3 show underpopulated C≡N bonding region.
The global electronic flux from the nitrone 1 to nitrile 2 and 3 is predicted, owing to the high electronic chemical potential and strong nucleophilicity of the cyclic nitrone 1 relative to the nitriles 2 and 3, which is confirmed from the GEDT calculations at the located TSs. Nitrile 2 shows lower electronic chemical potential and higher electrophilicity relative to nitrile 3, suggesting a more facile reaction with nitrone 1, also suggested by the higher GEDT for the 32CA reaction of nitrone 1 with nitrile 2, relative to that with 3.
These 32CA reactions are endergonic with positive free energy of reaction. The 2,3-dihydro-1,2,4-oxadiazole derivatives show higher thermodynamic stability relative to the 2,3-dihydro-1,2,5-oxadiazole derivatives, suggesting regioselectivity in complete coherence with the experiments. The 2,3-dihydro-1,2,4-oxadiazole obtained from the 32CA reaction of nitrone 1 with nitrile 2 is thermodynamically more stable compared to that generated from the 32CA reaction of with nitrile 3.
BET study along the regioisomeric reaction channels allows arriving at some important mechanistic conclusions. Along both the reaction paths, in the first four phases, the C=N bonding region of nitrone 1 and C≡N bonding region of the nitrile 2 are depopulated to create pseudoradical centres at C5 and C3 carbons and lone pair electron density at N2 nitrogen. The 32CA reaction of meta reaction path is more advanced relative to the ortho reaction path, indicated by the higher basin populations of monosynaptic basins V(C5), V(C3) and V(N2), accounting for the higher GEDT at the IRC points and at the TSs. The ortho reaction path follows one-step mechanism, and the formation of second C3–N4 single bond starts when 68% bond formation of the first O1–C5 single bond has been completed. The meta reaction path follows one-step two-stage mechanism and the formation of second O1–N4 single bond starts when the first C3–C5 bonding region has reached basin population of 2.01 e.
ELF study at the TSs and the calculated QTAIM parameters shows early TSs along the ortho reaction path, when the formation of new single covalent bond has not been started. On the other hand, the C3–C5 single bond has been formed at the meta TSs indicated by the negative Laplacian of electron density and formation of V(C3,C5) disynaptic basin.
References
Plate R, Hermkens PHH, Smits JMM, Nivard RJF, Ottenheijm HCJ (1987) Employment of nitriles in the stereoselective cycloaddition to nitrones. J Organ Chem 52(6):1047–1051. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo00382a014
Hermkens PHH, Maarseveen JHV, Kruse CG, Scheeren HW (1988) 1,3-Dipolar cycloaddition of nitrones with nitriles: scope and mechanistic study. Tetrahedron 44(20):6491–6504. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-4020(01)89838-0
Bokach NA, Kukushkin VY (2006) 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition of nitrones to free and coordinated nitriles: routes to control the synthesis of 2,3-dihydro-1,2,4-oxadiazoles. Russ Chem Bull 55(11):1869–1882. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11172-006-0528-0
Bokach NA, Kuznetsov ML, Kukushkin VY (2011) 1,3-Dipolar cycloaddition of nitrone-type dipoles to uncomplexed and metal-bound substrates bearing the CN triple bond. Coord Chem Rev 255(23):2946–2967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2011.07.001
Yu Y, Watanabe N, Ohno M, Eguchi S (1995) Synthesis of novel carbo- and heteropolycycles. Part 30. 1,3-Dipolar cycloaddition of nitrile functions with some selected nitrones. Efficient synthesis of 2,3-dihydro-1,2,4-oxadiazole derivatives. J Chem Soc Perkin Trans 1(11):1417–1421. https://doi.org/10.1039/P19950001417
Yu Y, Fujita H, Ohno M, Eguchi S (1995) 1,3-Dipolar cycloaddition of nitrile functions with nitrones under high pressure conditions. A new and direct synthesis of 2,3-Dihydro-1,2,4-Oxadiazole derivatives. Synthesis 05:498–500. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-1995-3949
Yu Y, Ohno M, Eguchi S (1994) Remarkable dipolarophilicity of nitrile function uncovered in the 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reaction of homoadamantane-incorporated nitrones. A direct and facile route to Δ4-1,2,4-oxadiazoline (2,3-dihydro-1,2,4-oxadiazole) derivatives. J Chem Soc Chem Commun 3:331–332. https://doi.org/10.1039/C39940000331
Krylov A, Windus TL, Barnes T, Marin-Rimoldi E, Nash JA, Pritchard B, Smith DGA, Altarawy D, Saxe P, Clementi C, Crawford TD, Harrison RJ, Jha S, Pande VS, Head-Gordon T (2018) Perspective: computational chemistry software and its advancement as illustrated through three grand challenge cases for molecular science. J Chem Phys 149(18):180901. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5052551
Domingo LR (2016) Molecular electron density theory: a modern view of reactivity in organic chemistry. Molecules 21(10):1319. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21101319
Ríos-Gutiérrez M, Domingo LR (2019) Unravelling the mysteries of the [3 + 2] cycloaddition reactions. Eur J Org Chem 2–3:267–282. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejoc.201800916
Domingo LR, Ríos-Gutiérrez M, Pérez P (2018) A molecular electron density theory study of the reactivity and selectivities in [3 + 2] cycloaddition reactions of C, N-dialkyl nitrones with ethylene derivatives. J Organ Chem 83(4):2182–2197. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.7b03093
Mohammad-Salim H, Hassan R, Abdallah HH, Oftadeh M (2020) The theoretical study on the mechanism of [3 + 2] cycloaddition reactions between α, β-unsaturated selenoaldehyde with nitrone and with nitrile oxide. J Mex Chem Soc. https://doi.org/10.29356/jmcs.v64i2.1111
Domingo LR, Acharjee N (2020) Unravelling the strain-promoted [3 + 2] cycloaddition reactions of phenyl azide with cycloalkynes from the molecular electron density theory perspective. New J Chem 44(32):13633–13643. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0NJ02711A
Domingo LR, Acharjee N (2020) Unveiling the high reactivity of strained dibenzocyclooctyne in [3 + 2] cycloaddition reactions with diazoalkanes through the molecular electron density theory. J Phys Org Chem. https://doi.org/10.1002/poc.4100
Domingo LR, Acharjee N (2020) A molecular electron density theory study of the Grignard reagent-mediated regioselective direct synthesis of 1,5-disubstituted-1,2,3-triazoles. J Phys Org Chem 33(8):e4062. https://doi.org/10.1002/poc.4062
Domingo LR, Ríos-Gutiérrez M, Acharjee N (2019) A molecular electron density theory study of the chemoselectivity, regioselectivity, and diastereofacial selectivity in the synthesis of an anticancer spiroisoxazoline derived from α-santonin. Molecules 24(5):832. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24050832
Abbiche K, Mohammad-Salim H, Salah M, Mazoir N, Zeroual A, El Abdallaoui HEA, El Hammadi A, Hilali M, Abdallah HH, Hochlaf M (2020) Insights into the mechanism and regiochemistry of the 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reaction between benzaldehyde and diazomethane. Theoret Chem Acc 139(9):148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-020-02662-4
Wagner G (2003) Theoretical study of the [2 + 3] cycloaddition of nitrones to nitriles—influence of nitrile substituent, solvent and lewis acid coordination. Chem A Eur J 9(7):1503–1510. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.200390172
Kuznetsov ML, Kukushkin VY, Dementev AI, Pombeiro AJL (2003) 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition of nitrones to free and Pt-bound nitriles. A theoretical study of the activation effect, reactivity, and mechanism. J Phys Chem A 107(31):6108–6120. https://doi.org/10.1021/jp035261k
Becke AD, Edgecombe KE (1990) A simple measure of electron localization in atomic and molecular systems. J Chem Phys 92(9):5397–5403. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.458517
Silvi B, Savin A (1994) Classification of chemical bonds based on topological analysis of electron localization functions. Nature 371(6499):683–686. https://doi.org/10.1038/371683a0
Geerlings P, De Proft F, Langenaeker W (2003) Conceptual density functional theory. Chem Rev 103(5):1793–1874. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr990029p
Domingo LR, Ríos-Gutiérrez M, Pérez P (2016) Applications of the conceptual density functional theory indices to organic chemistry reactivity. Molecules 21(6):748
Sutcliffe BT (2006) The idea of a potential energy surface. Mol Phys 104(5–7):715–722. https://doi.org/10.1080/00268970500418059
Domingo LR (2014) A new C-C bond formation model based on the quantum chemical topology of electron density. RSC Adv 4(61):32415–32428. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA04280H
Thom R (1974) Stabilité Structurelle et Morphogenèse (Interéditions) 1972. THOM, R, Modèles Mathématiques de la Morphogenèse (Edi-tions 10-18)
Krokidis X, Silvi B, Alikhani ME (1998) Topological characterization of the isomerization mechanisms in XNO (X = H, Cl). Chem Phys Lett 292(1):35–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(98)00650-2
Bader RFW, Bader RF (1990) Atoms in molecules: a quantum theory. Clarendon Press, Oxford
Bader RF, Essén H (1984) The characterization of atomic interactions. J Chem Phys 80(5):1943–1960
Schlegel HB (1982) Optimization of equilibrium geometries and transition structures. J Comput Chem 3(2):214–218. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.540030212
Wiberg KB (1986) Ab initio molecular orbital theory by W. J. Hehre, L. Radom, P. v. R. Schleyer, and J. A. Pople, John Wiley, New York, 548 pp. J Comput Chem 7(3):379–379. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.540070314
Mohammad-Salim HA, Acharjee N, Domingo LR, Hassan HH (2020) A molecular electron density theory study for [3 + 2] cycloaddition reactions of 1-Pyrroline-1-oxide with disubstituted acetylenes leading to bicyclic 4-isoxazolines. Int J Quantum Chem. https://doi.org/10.1002/qua.26503
Dresler E, Kącka-Zych A, Kwiatkowska M, Jasiński R (2018) Regioselectivity, stereoselectivity, and molecular mechanism of [3 + 2] cycloaddition reactions between 2-methyl-1-nitroprop-1-ene and (Z)-C-aryl-N-phenylnitrones: a DFT computational study. J Mol Model 24(11):329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-018-3861-y
Alnajjar RA, Jasiński R (2019) Competition between [2 + 1]- and [4 + 1]-cycloaddition mechanisms in reactions of conjugated nitroalkenes with dichlorocarbene in the light of a DFT computational study. J Mol Model 25(6):157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00894-019-4006-7
Adjieufack AI, Ndassa IM, Mbadcam JK, Ríos-Gutiérrez M, Domingo LR (2016) Understanding the reaction mechanism of the Lewis acid (MgBr 2)-catalysed [3 + 2] cycloaddition reaction between C-methoxycarbonyl nitrone and 2-propen-1-ol: a DFT study. Theoret Chem Acc 136(1):5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-016-2028-0
Fukui K (1970) Formulation of the reaction coordinate. J Phys Chem 74(23):4161–4163. https://doi.org/10.1021/j100717a029
Gonzalez C, Schlegel HB (1990) Reaction path following in mass-weighted internal coordinates. J Phys Chem 94(14):5523–5527. https://doi.org/10.1021/j100377a021
Gonzalez C, Schlegel HB (1991) Improved algorithms for reaction path following: higher-order implicit algorithms. J Chem Phys 95(8):5853–5860. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.461606
Tomasi J, Persico M (1994) Molecular interactions in solution: an overview of methods based on continuous distributions of the solvent. Chem Rev 94(7):2027–2094. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr00031a013
Simkin BIAK, Sheĭkhet III (1995) Quantum chemical and statistical theory of solutions: a computational approach. Ellis Horwood, Chichester
Cossi M, Barone V, Cammi R, Tomasi J (1996) Ab initio study of solvated molecules: a new implementation of the polarizable continuum model. Chem Phys Lett 255(4):327–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2614(96)00349-1
Cancès E, Mennucci B, Tomasi J (1997) A new integral equation formalism for the polarizable continuum model: theoretical background and applications to isotropic and anisotropic dielectrics. J Chem Phys 107(8):3032–3041. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.474659
Barone V, Cossi M, Tomasi J (1998) Geometry optimization of molecular structures in solution by the polarizable continuum model. J Comput Chem 19(4):404–417. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1096-987x(199803)19:4%3c404:aid-jcc3%3e3.0.co;2-w
Reed AE, Weinstock RB, Weinhold F (1985) Natural population analysis. J Chem Phys 83(2):735–746. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.449486
Reed AE, Curtiss LA, Weinhold F (1988) Intermolecular interactions from a natural bond orbital, donor-acceptor viewpoint. Chem Rev 88(6):899–926. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr00088a005
Lu T, Chen F (2012) Multiwfn: a multifunctional wavefunction analyzer. J Comput Chem 33(5):580–592. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.22885
Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng CC, Ferrin TE (2004) UCSF Chimera–a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J Comput Chem 25(13):12–1605. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.20084
Frisch M, Trucks G, Schlegel H, Scuseria G, Robb M, Cheeseman J, Scalmani G, Barone V, Petersson G, Nakatsuji H (2016) Gaussian 16. Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford
Huisgen R (1976) 1,3-Dipolar cycloadditions. 76. Concerted nature of 1,3-dipolar cycloadditions and the question of diradical intermediates. J Organ Chem 41(3):403–419. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo00865a001
Parr RG, Yang W (1995) Density-functional theory of the electronic structure of molecules. Annu Rev Phys Chem 46(1):701–728. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pc.46.100195.003413
Domingo LR, Ríos-Gutiérrez M, Duque-Noreña M, Chamorro E, Pérez P (2016) Understanding the carbenoid-type reactivity of nitrile ylides in [3 + 2] cycloaddition reactions towards electron-deficient ethylenes: a molecular electron density theory study. Theoret Chem Acc 135(7):160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-016-1909-6
Domingo LR, Acharjee N (2018) [3 + 2] cycloaddition reaction of C-Phenyl-N-methyl nitrone to acyclic-olefin-bearing electron-donating substituent: a molecular electron density theory study. ChemistrySelect 3(28):8373–8380. https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.201801528
Acharjee N, Banerji A (2020) A molecular electron density theory study to understand the interplay of theory and experiment in nitrone-enone cycloaddition. J Chem Sci 132(1):65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12039-020-01766-5
Domingo LR, Aurell MJ, Pérez P, Contreras R (2002) Quantitative characterization of the global electrophilicity power of common diene/dienophile pairs in Diels-Alder reactions. Tetrahedron 58(22):4417–4423. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-4020(02)00410-6
Jaramillo P, Domingo LR, Chamorro E, Pérez P (2008) A further exploration of a nucleophilicity index based on the gas-phase ionization potentials. J Mol Struct (Thoechem) 865(1):68–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.theochem.2008.06.022
Parr RG, Weitao Y (1994) Density-functional theory of atoms and molecules. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Parr RG, Pearson RG (1983) Absolute hardness: companion parameter to absolute electronegativity. J Am Chem Soc 105(26):7512–7516. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00364a005
Parr RG, Lv Szentpály, Liu S (1999) Electrophilicity index. J Am Chem Soc 121(9):1922–1924. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja983494x
Domingo LR, Chamorro E, Pérez P (2008) Understanding the reactivity of captodative ethylenes in polar cycloaddition reactions. A theoretical study. J Organ Chem 73(12):4615–4624. https://doi.org/10.1021/jo800572a
Benchouk W, Mekelleche SM, Silvi B, Aurell MJ, Domingo LR (2011) Understanding the kinetic solvent effects on the 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition of benzonitrile N-oxide: a DFT study. J Phys Org Chem 24(7):611–618. https://doi.org/10.1002/poc.1858
Domingo LR, Ríos-Gutiérrez M, Pérez P (2020) A molecular electron density theory study of the participation of tetrazines in aza-Diels–Alder reactions. RSC Adv 10(26):15394–15405. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0RA01548B
Domingo LR, Ríos-Gutiérrez M, Pérez P (2020) Unveiling the lewis acid catalyzed diels-alder reactions through the molecular electron density theory. Molecules 25(11):2535. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules25112535
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mohammad-Salim, H.A., Acharjee, N. & Abdallah, H.H. Insights into the mechanism and regioselectivity of the [3 + 2] cycloaddition reactions of cyclic nitrone to nitrile functions with a molecular electron density theory perspective. Theor Chem Acc 140, 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-020-02703-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-020-02703-y