Abstract
Popliteal cyst is a common condition of popliteal region and usually coexists with intra-articular pathologies. Typically it is an extension of the natural gastrocnemius-semimembranosus bursa caused by one-way joint fluid leakage to the bursa through existing valvular mechanism. If symptomatic, the popliteal cyst should be treated surgically. The most effective treatment involves correction of intra-articular pathologies, elimination of the valvular mechanism, and excision of cystic walls. In this chapter we present an arthroscopic technique of typical popliteal cyst treatment addressing each step of pathophysiological pathway of cyst formation.
The sural nerve is the most commonly used donor nerve in peripheral nerve and brachial plexus surgery. The grafts may reach up to 40 cm in length from one sided sural nerve harvest depending on the leg size. Graft harvesting procedure results in an acceptable donor site deficit, but the incision extending over the whole lower leg may both compromise cosmetic appearances and predispose subsequent regional complications. Endoscopic harvest preserves the best of both worlds, maintaining the small incision, with complete graft extraction and preservation.
The outside-in method is widely performed for suturing the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus, however, it has some disadvantages including skin incision and superficial knots. The all-inside devices were hard to be applied in anterior half of lateral meniscus (AHLM) due to the limited angle under arthroscopy. The safe Larai portal is developed as a feasible alternative to repair tears of the AHLM by all-inside devices under direct arthroscopic visualization.
The corresponding author of section 12.1 is Konrad Malinowski, Email: konrad.malinowski@artromedical.pl
The corresponding author of section 12.2 is Lukas Rasulić, Email: lukas.rasulic@gmail.com
The corresponding author of section 12.3 is Rui Yang, Email: yangr@mail.sysu.edu.cn
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Popliteal cyst
- Baker’s cyst
- Endoscopy
- Valvular mechanism
- Fluid overproduction
- Cyst excision
- Peripheral nerve
- Brachial plexus
- Nerve repair
- Sural nerve
- Larai portal
- All-inside
- Arthroscopy
- Anterior half of lateral meniscus
- Meniscus tear
1 Endoscopic Treatment of Popliteal Cysts
1.1 Introduction
A popliteal cyst, commonly called Baker’s cyst, is a frequent pathology meet in everyday orthopedic practice. Affected patients usually complain on symptoms as posterior knee pain, knee stiffness, limited knee flexion at the end of the day or palpable mass, and feeling of fullness in the popliteal region, depending on the size and location of the cyst [1, 2]. However, it is important to remember that in adults almost all popliteal cysts are secondary and thus should be treated rather as an indicator of intra-articular pathologies than the disease itself [2]. In fact, the popliteal cyst usually is an enlargement of a natural gastrocnemius-semimembranosus bursa located in the posteromedial part of the knee [3]. The pathomechanism of its development is well-investigated and two main factors, namely excessive joint fluid production and valvular mechanism in the posteromedial joint capsule play the key roles in this process [2,3,4]. Common knee pathologies as meniscal tears, chondral lesions, or different types of instabilities are observed in as much as 94% of patients with popliteal cysts [5, 6]. All of them are responsible for an overproduction of synovial fluid and increase in an intra-articular pressure which lead to fluid extravasation to gastrocnemius-semimembranosus bursa through the existing in almost a half of population natural connection in the posteromedial capsule [7]. Further, the posteromedial fold that in most cases works as a valve allows only for a unidirectional fluid flow to the bursa during knee extension and precludes its evacuation during knee flexion [7]. To summarize, synovial fluid overproduction, increased intra-articular pressure, and valvular mechanism allowing for unidirectional fluid flow are responsible for development and enlargement of popliteal cyst leading to symptoms.
Conservative treatment involving fluid evacuation, intra-articular or intra-cystic steroids injections, or sclerotherapy is just a temporary solution and is not effective, especially in case of osteoarthritic changes [3, 8]. Surgical treatment is a gold standard of popliteal cyst management and many surgical techniques were developed for addressing this pathology. Open surgical procedures are associated with extensive approach, high risk of important anatomical structures injuries, potential risk of wound complications, prolonged recovery time and provide an unacceptable risk of cyst recurrence [1, 4, 5]. One of the main reasons of ineffectiveness of classic surgeries has been explained in the literature through the lack of addressing concomitant intra-articular pathologies involved in cyst development [9]. The importance of managing articular lesions concurrently with treatment of the cyst itself has been broadly outlined in the literature and thus, arthroscopic techniques have become the treatment of choice [3, 5, 6, 9, 10]. On the other hand, elimination of only the intra-articular lesions appears to be not enough to resolve the problem with popliteal cyst [5]. Arthroscopy allows for concomitant pathologies treatment, provides easy access to cyst decompression, and is characterized with minimal invasiveness and fast recovery [11, 12]. The controversies appear around the method of dealing with valvular mechanism. Whereas some authors suggest that valvular mechanism should be corrected by closing the posteromedial fold, others favor broad opening of the posteromedial fold that allows to re-establish the natural bidirectional fluid flow between the knee joint and gastrocnemius-semimembranosus bursa [1, 5]. We support the second approach because the data suggests that valvular-closing surgeries provide lower success rate (84.6% vs 96.7%), higher recurrence rate due to persistent high pressure in the cyst and finally, the connection between the knee joint and bursa is a normal anatomical variant [5, 7, 9, 13]. The last point of a broad discussion is whether ones should excise or not the cyst walls. The literature suggests that cyst walls excision may be associated with lower rate of recurrence (0 vs 8%), higher rate of overall success (98.2% vs 94.7%), but also with more intraoperative and postoperative complications (6.5% vs 1.6%) and longer operative time [4, 9, 14]. However, it is suggested that cyst wall excision should be popularized especially among the experienced and skilled knee surgeons [9]. To summarize, the most up-to-date data evidence that the most effective management on popliteal cyst is an arthroscopic treatment of concomitant intra-articular pathologies with opening of the valvular mechanism and cystic walls excision [3, 7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19].
Based on a 17-years experience in arthro/endoscopic treatment of popliteal cysts of the senior author (K.M) we support the approach to address the whole pathophysiological pathway of popliteal cyst development. In our opinion that is only way to treat our patients effectively. In this chapter we present a simple, safe, and effective technique of typical popliteal cyst arthroscopic treatment with valvular mechanism opening and cyst wall excision. We also show how to manage with demanding, atypical popliteal cysts. At the end we present some pearls and pitfalls which facilitate effective and safe maneuvering in the “dark side of the knee.”
1.2 Indications
Presented procedure is indicated for symptomatic popliteal cysts diagnosed with clinical and radiological examination (Fig. 12.1).
1.3 Contraindications
The procedure should not be performed in case of cysts which are not typical “popliteal” ones: an aneurysm, a varicose, cysts developed in location other than gastrocnemius-semimembranosus bursa, as well as in patients with limited knee flexion below 80–90° and unacceptable general risk of surgery.
1.4 Author Preferred Technique
1.4.1 Preoperative Planning
Each patient scheduled for an arthroscopic treatment of popliteal cyst should have an MRI performed to diagnose concomitant intra-articular lesions and to determine the main features of the cyst. One should focus on the size of the cyst, its connection with the joint cavity, its location-neighborhood of popliteal neurovascular bundle, and other important muscular and tendinous structures (Fig. 12.2). It allows to plan adequate arthroscopic portals placement and exclude atypical cysts, which could be contraindications for surgery. If any doubt occurs, Doppler ultrasound exam may be helpful to determine the position of lateral wall of the cyst in relation to popliteal neurovascular bundle (Fig. 12.3). Remember that typical popliteal cyst should be well separated from the popliteal neurovascular bundle with medial head of gastrocnemius.
1.4.2 Patient Positioning
For typical popliteal cysts the patient is positioned supine with the knee placed in a leg support that it is possible to flex the knee above 90°. A non-sterile thigh tourniquet is placed high at the thigh and inflated to avoid excessive bleeding and disrupted visualization through the procedure. The knee is prepared and draped in a sterile fashion (Fig. 12.4). For atypical popliteal cysts which are large, descends to the calf, or lie adjacently to the popliteal neurovascular bundle the patient may be positioned prone when all intra-articular procedures are finished. The procedure is performed under regional or general anesthesia.
1.4.3 Diagnostic Arthroscopy and Treatment of Concomitant Intra-articular Pathologies
The diagnostic arthroscopy is performed through standard anterolateral and anteromedial portals. If concomitant intra-articular lesions exist, they should be treated at first. If the cyst is addressed before intra-articular pathologies, the risk of fluid extravasation into the cyst and, theoretically, risk of compartment syndrome development increases. Pay attention to properly diagnose and treat concomitant lesions. If left untreated, the chance for resolve the popliteal cysts decreases.
1.4.4 Typical Popliteal Cyst Treatment
At the beginning of the “popliteal” part of the procedure the arthroscope should be placed in the posteromedial compartment of the knee. To do it, the so-called trans-notch maneuver is performed. With the knee in a slight flexion a mild valgus stress is applied and the arthroscope introduced through the anterolateral portal is pushed through the space between posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) superiorly, lateral wall of medial femoral condyle (MFC) medially, and posterior horn of medial meniscus (MM) inferiorly, to the posteromedial compartment (Fig. 12.5). The rest of procedure is performed with the knee flexed to 90°. In cases of typical connection between the knee joint and gastrocnemius-semimembranosus bursa, posteromedial fold and medial border of tendinous part of gastrocnemius should be visualized (Fig. 12.6). The entrance to the cyst is usually located just behind the fold, between the medial margin of the medial head of gastrocnemius and the lateral margin of the semimembranosus. The valve and the entrance to the cyst should be identified percutaneously using a spinal needle (Fig. 12.6). In the next step the posteromedial portal is created under visual control just above the posteromedial fold, 5–8 mm medially to the medial margin of medial head of gastrocnemius. Transillumination may be helpful to determine the position of saphenous vein and nerve to avoid their injury during portal formation. Under visual control the shaver and radiofrequency probe are sequentially introduced through posteromedial portal and used to excise the posteromedial fold and other tissue that could act as a valve to enlarge the communication between the cyst and the joint and to restore the bidirectional fluid flow (Fig. 12.7). It is extremely important to keep the working side of instruments directed anteriorly and medially, away from popliteal neurovascular bundle and not to use an aggressive shaver tip. In the last step of procedure, the arthroscope is pushed forward inside the cyst. The shaver is introduced subcutaneously through posteromedial portal, carefully moved dorsally along the medial wall of the cyst with the visual control of the position of its tip, introduced to the cyst through the medial wall and used to excise it (Fig. 12.8). Other walls are also resected using the shaver. At the end of the procedure, the arthroscope is moved back and the bidirectional fluid flow is inspected. Each tissue which may limit unrestricted fluid flow should be removed with shaver or radiofrequency probe.
Sometimes the posteromedial fold and the entrance to the cyst are not clearly visible, but the existence of popliteal cyst is known based on preoperative imaging. In this situation the posteromedial portal should be placed 5–8 mm medially to the medial margin of the medial head of gastrocnemius just above the level of posterior horn of MM. The shaver and radiofrequency probe should be introduced and used to carefully excise the posterior joint capsule vertically, just medial to tendinous margin of medial head of gastrocnemius and lateral to the semimembranosus tendon, where the entrance to the cyst is usually located. The dissection should be continued along the course of gastrocnemius. The walls of the cyst should be removed as presented previously.
1.4.5 Tips for Managing Difficult Popliteal Cysts [20]
Large popliteal cyst extending to the thigh
If the cyst is large and extends to the thigh an additional posteromedial portal may be created to facilitate its excision. It is located in the “soft spot” 3–7 cm proximal to the posteromedial portal above the hamstrings and below the vastus medialis. The switching stick is introduced straight to the cyst through posteromedial portal to determine the direction for further work with the shaver. The arthroscope is inserted to the cyst through additional posteromedial portal over the switching stick inserted again under direct visualization. The shaver and radiofrequency probe are used to excise the cystic walls and resect the valvular mechanism limiting the unrestricted bidirectional fluid flow (Fig. 12.9). In such a procedure when two posteromedial portals are used, the surgeon is partially turned away from the monitor. To make this situation more comfortable one could move the monitor to the head or affected side of the patient and make a maximal abduction of the leg.
Popliteal cyst caused by posterior medial meniscus pathology
If the popliteal cysts seem to have a connection with the cyst of posterior horn of MM and the body of meniscus looks like empty inside, based on the preoperative imaging, both pathologies may be treated at once. With the arthroscope introduced through the anterolateral portal, the scalpel is inserted through the anteromedial portal and used to open inner margin of MM body horizontally. Then the shaver and hook probe are used to enlarge the tunnel in the MM what provides bidirectional fluid flow between the popliteal cyst and the joint cavity. One could remove meniscal cyst thorough this trans-meniscal approach (Fig. 12.10).
Large popliteal cyst descending to the calf
If the popliteal cyst is large and descends to the calf, a special approach is required. The patient should be positioned prone. The ultrasound imaging should be used to determine the cyst and mark its boundaries. Then, at the medial side of lower boundary of the cyst a small skin incision is performed, the subcutaneous tissue is dissected bluntly, and the scope is introduced between the skin and cystic wall. Then the lateral portal is created under visual control. The needle is advanced percutaneously to the cyst until the fluid leakage is observed. It confirms the proper direction of the portal. Then the transcystic portals are made and the shaver is used to excise cystic walls under direct arthroscopic control.
The same approach or two posteromedial portal technique may be utilized to treat popliteal cyst which lateral wall lies close the popliteal neurovascular bundle. However, a resection of the deep part of the lateral wall of this kind of cyst may be very dangerous and finally, it does not improve significantly clinical results.
1.4.6 Complications and Management
Maneuvering in the posteromedial compartment of the knee may lead to some serious and minor complications.
-
Injury to popliteal neurovascular bundle
-
To avoid it, use a non-aggressive tip of the shaver, always have the tip of the shaver visualized and directed anteriorly and medially, away from popliteal neurovascular structures. You can also resign from excising the lateral wall of the cyst, to make the procedure safer. Always check orientation of the scope because the landmarks are less obvious in popliteal space. Palpation and feeling of the instruments through the skin is very helpful. The neurovascular bundle in our procedure should be separated from the cyst by the muscle belly of medial head of gastrocnemius and some loose adipose tissue around. An old orthopedic sentence says: “Do not touch a red and yellow tissue if you want to stay out of trouble”. When the injury to the popliteal neurovascular bundle occurs, the consultation of vascular surgeon may be needed.
-
Injury to saphenous nerve and vein
-
To avoid it, use a transillumination and keep the knee in 90° of flexion when creating the posteromedial portals.
-
Compartment syndrome in the calf
-
It is a theoretical complication, which may occur. To avoid it, treat concomitant intra-articular lesions at first, and then start to manage with popliteal cyst. Carefully check arthroscopic pump pressure and regularly assess a calf condition manually.
-
Popliteal hematoma
-
It usually occurs when an aggressive shaver tip is used to remove cyst walls lying on muscle bellies which are accidentally scratched or some minor subcutaneous veins are damaged. To avoid this, do not touch a “red” part of muscles, use a non-aggressive shaver’s tips, and coagulate all bleeding points before you finish. This minor complication usually resolves over time. Cold compresses and vascular agents may be helpful to accelerate this process.
-
Infection
-
That is not an isolated problem and occurs along with joint infection. As in any case of arthroscopic surgery, an antibiotic prophylaxis and sterile conditions are applied to avoid this complication.
1.4.7 Postoperative Care
The special rehabilitation protocol for popliteal cyst treatment does not exist. The rehabilitation is determined by the main intra-articular pathology which caused popliteal cyst development and was treated simultaneously with the cyst. To avoid postoperative contracture it is recommended to gain a free range of motion in the range of 0–90° on the first postoperative day.
1.5 Outcome
The senior author (K.M) in the last 17 years treated more than 1000 cases of patients with popliteal cysts. Since 2006–2012, 136 cases met our restricted inclusion criteria for simple technique of endoscopic typical popliteal cyst excision. 111 of them were available on follow-up. The surgical procedure involves treatment of intra-articular lesions, correction of valvular mechanism and cyst walls excision using single posteromedial portal in supine position. The patients were observed at 6, 12 months postoperatively and then once a year. The average follow-up was 37 months (6–71). The recurrence of the cyst was observed in 14 patients (12.3%), but in 12 of them the cyst was completely asymptomatic and found only in the ultrasound examination as a slit or small residual extension of gastrocnemius-semimembranosus bursa. The recurrence was strongly associated with severe cartilage lesions and residual instabilities, which could not be effectively addressed during primary surgery. In this study group no serious complications were observed. Transient complications involve calf swelling (9), popliteal hematoma (6), sensory deficit (2), superficial soft tissue infection (1), superficial vein damage (1).
1.6 Summary
-
Popliteal cyst is usually an extension of natural gastrocnemius-semimembranosus bursa which lies in the posteromedial part of the knee. In most cases it is associated with concomitant intra-articular lesions.
-
Popliteal cyst develops when intra-articular pressure increases due to joint fluid overproduction and the fluid leaks into the bursa through the valvular mechanism localized in the posteromedial capsule, which allows only for a unidirectional fluid flow.
-
The most effective surgical technique for addressing the popliteal cyst involves an arthroscopic treatment of intra-articular lesions with correction of valvular mechanism, which restores a bidirectional fluid flow followed with excision of cystic walls.
-
Maneuvering in the posteromedial compartment of the knee may be dangerous and to avoid complications some specific rules for using arthroscopic instruments must be applied.
Table 12.1 summarizes complex approach to treatment of popliteal cyst [20]. Used from Arthroscopy Techniques. It is an open access book published by Elsevier.
2 Endoscopic Harvest of Sural Nerve Graft
2.1 Introduction
Sural nerve is the most frequently used donor nerve in peripheral nerve and brachial plexus reconstruction procedures, as well as in orthopedic surgery, for iatrogenic and associated peripheral nerve injuries [21, 22]. Open surgery for sural nerve harvesting is usually done by making an incision over the whole length, or a series of small incisions along the pathway of the nerve. Both procedures have their advantages and flaws: while the long incision is related to extensive scarring, the series of incisions usually does not provide enough visualization and may be related to inadvertent damage, whereby the latter procedure was introduced only lately and requires further corroboration [23]. The imperfections of the open method served as a platform for an interesting application of endoscope in peripheral nerve surgery. The method for endoscopic sural nerve harvesting was first introduced by Kobayashi et al. in 1995 [24], and since then the technique has passed through many stages of improvement The procedure usually lasts no longer than 25 min, and with the latest technique it requires only one skin incision of 12 mm [25].
2.2 Anatomical and Physiological Considerations
Except for unmyelinated autonomic fibers, the sural nerve is a purely sensory nerve, providing cutaneous innervation. It is typically formed through the union of the lateral and medial sural cutaneous nerves, which originate from the common fibular (branch of the peroneal nerve) and tibial nerves. Rarely, the sural nerve is formed solely from the tibial nerve (medial sural cutaneous nerve) and even less commonly from the peroneal (lateral sural cutaneous nerve) [26].
The medial sural cutaneous nerve passes between the two heads of the gastrocnemius muscle, and runs through the deep fascia of the posterior compartment of the leg. At the midcalf level it conjures with the peroneal communicating branch and a lateral sural cutaneous nerve from the peroneal nerve. The nerve passes lateral to the calcaneal tendon, near the short saphenous vein, along the lateral border of the Achilles tendon and posterior to the lateral malleolus and the calcaneus. There, the nerve provides sensory supply to the posterior and lateral skin of the distal third of the leg, before passing distally along the lateral side of the foot and the little toe, to supply the overlying skin. The nerve anastomoses with the superficial fibular nerve on the dorsum of the foot [27]. Figure 12.11 illustrates the anatomy of the sural nerve(s).
2.3 Indications
Grafts from the sural nerve are considered the most appropriate for the use in peripheral nerve and brachial plexus surgery. Whenever the nervous tissue defect (nerve gap) is longer than 1–2 cm, the graft is needed to achieve the distal end for direct repair, as well as in nerve transfers, when donor nerve length is not sufficient for the coaptation with the target nerve.
Short grafts have better reinnervation potential. A single piece long graft may be divided into a few pieces, shorter in length, which may be used to adequately match the donor and target nerves thickness when appropriate. The use of up to eight pieces was reported when using the viable C5 nerve root, four to repair the musculocutaneous nerve and the other four to repair the axillary nerve [28].
2.4 Contraindications and Limitations
General limitations and contraindications applying to the peripheral nervous system reconstructive procedures apply to the use of sural nerve grafts as well.
Timing is important. The denervated muscle atrophies and develops fibrosis, losing its contraction capacity and reinnervation potential through the vanishing of functional units. Motor reinnervation procedure in the absence of functional motor units in the target muscle is redundant [29].
The most common specific contraindication for the use of a sural nerve graft is the presence of peripheral neuropathy, compromising the sensation of the lower extremity. This pathological state raises concerns for the sural nerve harvest, primarily due to the donor site morbidity, which may cause more severe complications, and secondarily due to the questionable viability and nerve soundness.
Patients with previous surgery or trauma involving the posterior aspect of the leg within the sural nerve pathway should be investigated for possible damage and nerve indemnity.
Some authors consider the nerve defect longer than 6 cm as a threshold for the use of a vascular graft; although debatable, this should be taken into account in the decision-making process. In these circumstances, free vascularized nerve grafts are preferred over traditional nerve grafts. Another indication for the free vascularized nerve graft is for the patients considered to have poor regional vascularization, as well as those with significant scarring and fibrosis [31].
2.5 Surgical Procedure
2.5.1 Preoperative Considerations
Although the sural nerve harvest is usually only a small part of a complex reconstructive procedure, the functional sacrifice in a previously healthy region is subject to a serious medico-legal arrangement. The procedure must be explained to the patient and a family member in detail. Even though the donor site morbidity (anesthesia of the lateral calf and dorsum of the foot) may recover in the future, understanding that it may be a permanent sacrifice is of utmost importance.
2.5.2 Equipment
The endoscopic procedure is not demanding in terms of equipment, as there is no dedicated system for the sural nerve harvesting. Apart from the rigid endoscopes, flexible instruments are usually utilized, and there is also a recently introduced technique with the endoscopic system primarily designed for greater saphenous vein harvesting [25].
The application of this system in sural nerve harvesting procedure is even less complicated than is the case for its primary purpose (vein graft harvesting), due to the lack of bleeding, the toughness of the nerve in comparison to the vein, the resistance to the minor force, and potential adherence of the vein. The system uses a bisector rotating carriage with a large profile cutting toggle and C-Ring slider to separate the nerve, with a common CO2 insufflation, and a 0-degree 5-mm camera [25].
2.5.3 Technique
As a rule, patients are positioned to the prone position for the sural nerve harvesting procedure. Exceptionally, endoscopic harvesting can also be performed from a supine position.
Before the patient is prepared and draped, it is essential to mark the landmarks and outline the sural nerve for the endoscopic procedure. The most reliable starting point to locate the nerve is at the classic spot, posterior to the lateral malleolus approximately half way between the malleolus and the Achilles tendon.
Classical endoscopic procedure (Fig. 12.12) is performed with the introduction of the endoscope through the 2 cm vertical incision at the starting point, along the outlined pathway to reach the length of the endoscope. Another incision is made, and the sural nerve is marked, before the procedure is repeated. Depending on the length of the endoscope, 3–4 incisions are needed to harvest the full-length sural nerve graft. The sural nerve is then resected and pulled out, and the incisions are closed. This technique allows for better bleeding control than when using a vein stripper [32].
The procedure using the greater saphenous vein graft endoscopic system (Fig. 12.13) is performed through a 12 mm vertical incision at the starting point. The sural nerve is identified and dissected proximally to prepare for the insufflation and dissection. A 12 mm trocar is inserted to create a seal for CO2 insufflation through the side port. The dissector with conical tip is introduced for initial dissection, before CO2 insufflation to 12 mmHg to expand the tunnel.
Guided with the camera, the dissector is advanced along the four surface sides of the sural nerve at the desired length, with careful dissection of all branches. The conical tip dissector is then replaced with a bipolar bisector. The C ring is advanced along the nerve, to allow for branches identification and retraction, before cauterizing and cutting with the bipolar bisector. It is important to keep the distance of at least 2 mm between the bipolar bisector and the sural nerve graft to prevent thermal damage. The graft is separated with scissors, while the distal and proximal stumps are coagulated to prevent neuroma formation.
Hemostasis is achieved with the bipolar bisector, and the equipment and the graft are pulled out before the incisions are closed.
2.6 Advantages and Disadvantages
The strongest advantage of the sural nerve graft harvesting procedure with the use of endoscope is that it allows for the intraprocedural visualization of the nerve for its viability and deflects an injury (Fig. 12.14). Also, it is done through a small incision, nevertheless allowing for complete nerve harvesting.
For many patients, especially young women, a long incision is not an option, since it only adds to the overall trauma of the nerve repair procedure. In particular, the presence of scars on the leg must be discussed ahead of the procedure.
Hemostasis is the most common limitation of the endoscopic procedures, but both presented methods deal well with this issue.
The most important unavoidable disadvantage is a relatively steep learning curve, which requires experienced endoscopic hands. Hence, for the surgeons switching from the open to the endoscopic approach, a supplementation with the cadaver lab training is a recommended way to go.
2.7 Complications
The general surgical complications are also common to the sural nerve harvesting procedures (poor wound healing and hypertrophic scarring). However, their probability is significantly lower with endoscopic techniques.
A painful neuroma at the site of nerve proximal section is a rare complication after sural nerve harvesting, and it is suggested to cauterize the proximal stump to prevent this complication [33].
The postoperative anesthesia of the dorsum and lateral aspect of the foot is a consequence rather than the complication. Some patients, however, may experience a hard time dealing with the sensory deficit. The pertinent anesthesia is expected to improve over a period of 1–2 years due to the collateral sprouting of the adjacent sensory nerves [31].
As they are unavoidable, these general complications should be considered natural history rather than procedural complications per se.
A procedure-specific complication occurs when the graft intended for the use with functional sacrifice at the donor site is damaged, especially when this damage remains unnoticed, in which case it might seriously compromise the whole complex reconstructive procedure.
2.8 Conclusion
The sural nerves grafts are probably the best possible option to use in peripheral nerve and brachial plexus reconstructive procedures. Both open and endoscopic harvesting procedures are still developing, each with its own imperfections.
The two endoscopic techniques presented have advantages over open surgery in terms of complete nerves visualization, mobilization, and adequate hemostasis. Providing a minimally invasive approach, with one or a few small incisions, the endoscopic techniques reduce common surgical complications and yield a far better cosmetic effect. Nevertheless, open surgery remains the most commonly used method, and is still a predominant standard for the graft harvesting in referential surgical centers worldwide.
3 Arthroscopic Management for the Anterior Half of Lateral Meniscus Through the Larai Portal
Currently, the outside-in method is widely performed for suturing the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus, however, it has disadvantages in that an 1–2 cm long skin incision and knots tied subcutaneously over the capsule are needed [30, 34,35,36,37,38]. The all-inside method would overcome all these drawbacks. However, due to the limited angle under arthroscopy, it is difficult to suture the anterior half of lateral meniscus (AHLM) in tears by all-inside devices [39, 40]. Furthermore, it is much more challenging for arthroscopic surgeons to visualize and resect the inferior leaf of the AHLM through routine arthroscopic portals, especially the tears involved the anterior horn of the lateral discoid meniscus [41,42,43].
We proposed the Larai portal to observe the lesions and facilitate the application of all-inside devices in AHLM. We describe the portal “Larai” due to the following main points: (a) Lateral. This portal is established for lateral meniscus; (b) All-round. This portal can be acted as a working portal or viewing portal to observe and treat various tears extending to the AHLM; (c) All-inside. The portal permits all-inside instruments to pass through, providing a broader application for all-inside meniscal suture technique. The establishment of the Larai portal during the arthroscopy is performed in the figure of four position around the level of the knee joint line. The trajectory passes through the posterior septum from posteromedial to posterolateral compartments of the knee, and closely adjoins the posterolateral margin of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) to lateral compartment of the knee joint. The main surgical steps are as follows.
Surgery is performed in the supine position under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. Routine diagnostic arthroscopy is performed using the standard anterolateral (AL) and anteromedial (AM) portals. If injuries to the AHLM are diagnosed based on preoperative local findings and imaging examination or arthroscopic examination, the Larai portal can be established. The knee is placed in the “figure of four” position with a 90° knee flexion to open the lateral compartment. First, a 1.0 mm long puncture needle is inserted from a point 1–2 cm lateral to the edge of the patellar tendon, closely adjoined to posterolateral margin of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) under arthroscopic visualization, and pierced through the medial skin of distal thigh. Second, the trajectory was broadened from the medial skin of distal thigh along the indwelled long puncture needle by a 3.5 mm cannulated switching stick with blunt end. Third, the long puncture needle is pulled out after the tip of switching stick reached the lateral compartment of knee under arthroscopic visualization. Next, the slotted cannula inserted into the articular cavity along the switching stick, locating behind it with the slot toward to the front. The switching stick is then retrieved but the slotted cannula is maintained in the trajectory until the arthroscopic procedure is finished. At last, the AHLM can be observed, resected, or repaired as needed through this protecting cannula (Fig. 12.15).
Some authors developed the all-inside methods that enables simple suture of the injury to the anterior horn of the meniscus through routine arthroscopic portal without using a specific instrument [44,45,46,47]. Meanwhile, various additional portals were proposed and described to visualize and resect the inferior leaf of the AHLM, including inframeniscal, lateral patellofemoral axillary, high anteromedial, or far anteromedial portal [48,49,50,51,52]. However, it is still insufficient to observe the deep-seated inferior leaf of the anterior horn meniscus and potentially increased risk of meniscus injury during the procedure. In addition, surgeons can hardly perform all-inside repair of the meniscal tears extending to the AHLM through these additional portals. The Larai portal which is a new portal permitting arthroscopic instruments to pass through from posteromedial side of the knee joint and provide a new route for all-inside repair of the AHLM tear under direct arthroscopic visualization.
References
Frush TJ, Noyes FR. Baker’s cyst: diagnostic and surgical considerations. Sports Health. 2015;7(4):359–65.
Cao Y, Jones G, Han W, et al. Popliteal cysts and subgastrocnemius bursitis are associated with knee symptoms and structural abnormalities in older adults: a cross-sectional study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2014;16(2):R59.
Herman AM, Marzo JM. Popliteal cysts: a current review. Orthopedics. 2014;37(8):e678–84.
Han JH, Bae JH, Nha KW, et al. Arthroscopic treatment of popliteal cysts with and without cystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2019;31(2):103–12.
Zhou XN, Li B, Wang JS, Bai LH. Surgical treatment of popliteal cyst: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2016;11:22.
Rupp S, Seil R, Jochum P, Kohn D. Popliteal cysts in adults. Prevalence, associated intraarticular lesions, and results after arthroscopic treatment. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30(1):112–5.
Lie CW, Ng TP. Arthroscopic treatment of popliteal cyst. Hong Kong Med J. 2011;17(3):180–3.
Jiang J, Ni L. Arthroscopic internal drainage and cystectomy of popliteal cyst in knee osteoarthritis. J Orthop Surg Res. 2017;12(1):182.
Su C, Kuang SD, Zhao X, Li YS, Xiong YL, Gao SG. Clinical outcome of arthroscopic internal drainage of popliteal cysts with or without cyst wall resection. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21(1):440.
Ohishi T, Takahashi M, Suzuki D, et al. Treatment of popliteal cysts via arthroscopic enlargement of unidirectional valvular slits. Mod Rheumatol. 2015;25(5):772–8.
Ahn JH, Yoo JC, Lee SH, Lee YS. Arthroscopic cystectomy for popliteal cysts through the posteromedial cystic portal. Arthroscopy. 2007;23(5):559.e1–4.
Pankaj A, Chahar D, Pathrot D. Arthroscopic management of popliteal cysts. Indian J Orthop. 2016;50(2):154–8.
Takahashi M, Nagano A. Arthroscopic treatment of popliteal cyst and visualization of its cavity through the posterior portal of the knee. Arthroscopy. 2005;21(5):638.
Cho JH. Clinical results of direct arthroscopic excision of popliteal cyst using a posteromedial portal. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2012;24(4):235–40.
Ahn JH, Lee SH, Yoo JC, Chang MJ, Park YS. Arthroscopic treatment of popliteal cysts: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging results. Arthroscopy. 2010;26(10):1340–7.
Ko S, Ahn J. Popliteal cystoscopic excisional debridement and removal of capsular fold of valvular mechanism of large recurrent popliteal cyst. Arthroscopy. 2004;20(1):37–44.
Liebensteiner MC, Thaler M, Putzer D, Wurm A, Nogler M. Arthroskopische Operation der Baker-Zyste: Operationstechnik. Videobeitrag [Arthroscopic procedure for Baker’s cysts: surgical technique. Video article]. Orthopade. 2015;44(10):803–5.
Kongmalai P, Chernchujit B. Arthroscopic treatment of popliteal cyst: a direct posterior portal by inside-out technique for intracystic debridement. Arthrosc Tech. 2015;4(2):e143–8.
Vaishya R, Krishnan M, Vijay V, Agarwal AK. Arthroscopic management of popliteal cyst: comments and concerns. Indian J Orthop. 2017;51(2):229.
Malinowski K, Hermanowicz K, Góralczyk A, et al. Possible approaches to endoscopic treatment of popliteal cysts: from the basics to troublesome cases. Arthrosc Tech. 2019;8(4):e375–82.
Rasulic L, Savic A, Vitosevic F, Samardzic M, Zivkovic B, Micovic M, et al. Iatrogenic peripheral nerve injuries-surgical treatment and outcome: 10 years’ experience. World Neurosurg. 2017;103:841–51.e6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2017.04.099.
Rasulic L, Cinara I, Samardzic M, Savic A, Zivkovic B, Vitosevic F, et al. Nerve injuries of the upper extremity associated with vascular trauma-surgical treatment and outcome. Neurosurg Rev. 2017;40(2):241–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-016-0755-2.
Cinal H, Barin EZ, Kara M, Karaduman H, Cengiz IZ, Tan O, et al. A new method to harvest the sural nerve graft. Eurasian J Med. 2020;52(1):12–5. https://doi.org/10.5152/eurasianjmed.2019.19102.
Kobayashi S, Akizuki T, Sakai Y, Ohmori K. Harvest of sural nerve grafts using the endoscope. Ann Plast Surg. 1995;35(3):249–53. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000637-199509000-00005.
Park SB, Cheshier S, Michaels D, Murovic JA, Kim DH. Endoscopic harvesting of the sural nerve graft: technical note. Neurosurgery. 2006;58(1 Suppl):ONS-E180; discussion ONS-E. https://doi.org/10.1227/01.NEU.0000193527.31749.2F.
Riedl O, Frey M. Anatomy of the sural nerve: cadaver study and literature review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131(4):802–10. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182818cd4.
Craig A. Chapter 48 – Nerve compression/entrapment sites of the lower limb. In: Tubbs RS, Rizk E, Shoja MM, Loukas M, Barbaro N, Spinner RJ, editors. Nerves and nerve injuries. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 2015. p. 755–70.
Rasulic L, Savic A, Lepic M, Kovacevic V, Vitosevic F, Novakovic N, et al. Viable C5 and C6 proximal stump use in reconstructive surgery of the adult brachial plexus traction injuries. Neurosurgery. 2020;86(3):400–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyz179.
Rasulić L, Simić V, Savić A, Lepić M, Kovačević V, Puzović V, et al. The role of arm volumes evaluation in the functional outcome and patient satisfaction following surgical repair of the brachial plexus traumatic injuries. Neurological Res. 2020.
Silberberg MJ, Nilo FA, Gimenez M, Muina RJ. Outside-in single-lasso loop technique for meniscal repair: fast, economic, and reproducible. Arthrosc Tech. [Journal Article]. 2018;7(11):e1191–6.
Butler DP, Johal KS, Wicks CE, Grobbelaar AO. Objective sensory and functional outcomes at the donor site following endoscopic-assisted sural nerve harvest. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017;70(5):659–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2017.02.022.
Mobbs R. Peripheral nerve endoscopy: a cadaveric study. 2002.
Brunelli GA. Prevention of damage caused by sural nerve withdrawal for nerve grafting. Hand Surg. 2002;7(2):163–6. https://doi.org/10.1142/s0218810402001138.
Serrano PM, Amorim-Barbosa T, Santos SM, Sousa R. Alternative method of outside-in meniscal repair for anterior horn tears. Open Access J Sports Med. [Journal Article]. 2018;9:167–70.
Menge TJ, Dean CS, Chahla J, Mitchell JJ, LaPrade RF. Anterior horn meniscal repair using an outside-in suture technique. Arthrosc Techn. 2016;5(5):e1111–6.
Thompson SM, Spalding T, Church S. A novel and cheap method of outside-in meniscal repair for anterior horn tears. Arthrosc Techn. 2014;3(2):e233–5.
Dave LY, Caborn DN. Outside-in meniscus repair: the last 25 years. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. [Journal Article; Review]. 2012;20(2):77–85.
Vinyard TR, Wolf BR. Meniscal repair: outside-in repair. Clin Sports Med. [Journal Article; Review]. 2012;31(1):33–48.
Alentorn-Geli E, Choi J, Stuart J, Toth A, Garrett W, Taylor D, et al. Inside-out or outside-in suturing should not be considered the standard repair method for radial tears of the midbody of the lateral meniscus: a systematic review and meta-analysis of biomechanical studies. J Knee Surg. 2016;29(07):604–12.
Elmallah R, Jones LC, Malloch L, Barrett GR. A meta-analysis of arthroscopic meniscal repair: inside-out versus outside-in versus all-inside techniques. J Knee Surg. 2019;32(08):750–7.
Na SI, Woo MS, Lee JM, Kim MK. A new surgical technique of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy for unstable inferior leaf of the anterior horn in a horizontal tear of lateral meniscus. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2013;25(3):147–9.
Muniandy M, Rajagopal S, Tahir S. Arthroscopic all-inside repair of tear of the anterior horn of discoid lateral meniscus. Surg J. 2019;05(01):e35–7.
Chen D, Li Q, Sun Y, Qin J, Yao Y, Jiang Q. Arthroscopic management for the unstable inferior leaf of the lateral meniscus anterior horn and associated cysts through a direct inframeniscal portal: a retrospective study. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:1–7.
Kan H, Arai Y, Nakagawa S, Inoue H, Fujii Y, Fujiwara H, et al. All-inside meniscus repair method for injury of the margin of the anterior segment of the meniscus. Arthrosc Techn. 2018;7(3):e215–8.
Wang Z, Xiong Y, Tang X, Li Q, Zhang Z, Li J, et al. An arthroscopic repair technique for meniscal tear using a needle and suture: outside-in transfer all-inside repair. BMC Musculoskel Dis. 2019;20(1).
Cho J. Arthroscopic all-inside repair of anterior horn tears of the lateral meniscus using a spinal needle. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008;16(7):683–6.
Lee CK, Suh JT, Yoo CI, Cho HL. Arthroscopic all-inside repair techniques of lateral meniscus anterior horn tear: a technical note. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. [Journal Article; Review]. 2007;15(11):1335–9.
Kim J, Bin S, Kim E. Inframeniscal portal for horizontal tears of the meniscus. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2009;25(3):269–73.
Choi N, Victoroff BN. Anterior horn tears of the lateral meniscus in soccer players. Arthrosc J Arthrosc Relat Surg. 2006;22(5):484–8.
Kim SJ, Jung KA, Kim JM, Kwun JD, Baek SH, Han JN. Arthroscopic all-inside repair of tears of the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus. Arthroscopy. [Journal Article]. 2005;21(11):1399.
Kim SJ, Park IS. Arthroscopic resection for the unstable inferior leaf of anterior horn in the horizontal tear of a lateral meniscus. Arthroscopy. [Journal Article; Technical Report]. 2004;20 Suppl 2:146–8.
Kim SJ, Kim HJ. High portal: practical philosophy for positioning portals in knee arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. [Journal Article]. 2001;17(3):333–7.
Acknowledgments
None
Funding disclosure
None
Conflict of interest
The authors have nothing to disclose, nor conflicts of interest related to this article, and the contents of this manuscript have not been previously published.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lui, T.H. et al. (2021). Posterior Knee Endoscopy. In: Lui, T.H. (eds) Endoscopy of the Hip and Knee. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3488-8_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-3488-8_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-3487-1
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-3488-8
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)