Abstract
Lung cancer is increasingly common and fatal worldwide. Resectable lung cancers are associated with various regional mass effects, paraneoplastic syndromes, and neoadjuvant therapies which greatly impact anesthetic management. Anesthesia for lung cancer surgeries involves many challenges including one-lung ventilation (OLV) in patients with limited pulmonary reserve, complex airway management, and critical analgesia to facilitate postoperative recovery. Preoperative assessment of the patient’s mechanical and parenchymal lung function, as well as cardiopulmonary interaction, stratifies the risk of perioperative complications. Recent advances in anesthetic and surgical management have expanded the envelope of patients considered to have an operable disease with acceptable risk. The thoracic anesthetist requires strong knowledge of bronchoscopic anatomy for effective lung isolation and surgical exposure. It is crucial to have an organized approach to managing hypoxemia during one-lung ventilation, both during thoracoscopic and open chest surgery. An expanding body of literature supports a multi-faceted anesthetic approach to mitigate the risk of postoperative acute lung injury (ALI), the most common cause of morbidity and mortality in lung cancer resection patients. Preventive strategies for chronic thoracotomy pain need further robust well-conducted research.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Lung cancer
- Preoperative assessment
- One-lung ventilation
- Lung isolation
- Double-lumen tube
- Bronchial blocker
- Hypoxemia
- Acute lung injury
- Thoracic epidural analgesia
- Paravertebral block
1 Introduction
Globally, lung cancer remains the most common cancer and the most common cause of cancer-related death [1, 2]. Smoking tobacco is the attributable etiology of 90% of lung cancer patients. Other carcinogens include asbestos and radon gas. Cessation of smoking reduces the risk of lung cancer with time but it never equates to that of non-smokers. With increasing incidence, death due to cancer shall surpass cardiac-related death in North America in this decade [2].
Most thoracic surgical procedures are performed for malignancy [3]. Given the variety of physiologic and anatomic implications of each lung cancer, the anesthesiologist must understand the patient’s pathologic diagnosis obtained through bronchoscopy, mediastinoscopy, or trans-thoracic needle aspiration. Lung cancer is broadly divided into small cell and non-small cell lung cancers. The management strategies and outcomes differ among these types.
2 Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the predominant type (approximately 80%) and the rest 20% are under the small cell lung cancer (SCLC) category. NSCLC includes adenocarcinoma (most common), squamous cell, and large-cell carcinoma. Overall 5-year survival approaches 40% with surgery compared to 10% without surgery [2].
Adenocarcinoma spreads locally and tends to invade the chest wall, diaphragm, and pericardium while metastasizing early to the brain, bones, liver, and adrenals. Most Pancoast tumors are adenocarcinomas. Associated paraneoplastic syndromes include growth hormone, corticotropin, and hypertrophic pulmonary osteoarthropathy (HPOE). Bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (BAC) is a subtype of adenocarcinoma. The etiology of BAC is unrelated to smoking, with limited metastatic spread, therefore can be treated by lung transplantation [4].
Squamous cell carcinomas are large tumors strongly linked to cigarette smoking with delayed metastases. The presenting features of squamous cell lung cancer are primarily related to mass effects. They manifest as hemoptysis, obstructive pneumonia, superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome, cavitation, and large airway or vessel involvement. Hypercalcemia results from parathyroid-like factor.
The rare large cell undifferentiated carcinoma commonly involves a rapidly growing and metastasizing peripheral lung mass.
3 Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC)
This neuroendocrine tumor is considered metastatic on presentation and generally warrants medical not surgical management. Unlike NSCLC, it is simply staged as limited or extensive. Up to 80% of patients with localized disease may respond to chemotherapy such as etoposide/cisplatin or cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine. Additional treatment includes radiation to the lung mass and radiation prophylaxis to the brain. Nonetheless, recurrence is common and overall survival is generally below 10%. Patients with the advanced disease typically receive chemotherapy and palliative radiation [2].
SCLC has been found to have characteristics of paraneoplastic syndromes. The features include hyponatremia due to a syndrome of inappropriate anti-diuretic hormone (SIADH) and Cushing syndrome through ectopic production of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH). Lambert-Eaton or myasthenic syndrome is a rare associated paraneoplastic syndrome caused by an impaired release of acetylcholine from nerve terminals in these patients of SCLC [2]. The usual manifestation is typically proximal limb weakness, and this weakness improves with physical activity. Electromyography (EMG) confirms the presence of this syndrome [5]. Like myasthenia gravis, the use of non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents should be used cautiously as these patients are very sensitive to its effects. And also they have a poor response to anticholinesterase reversal agents [6]. These factors need to be considered during anesthetic planning for surgical interventions.
4 Carcinoid Tumors
Carcinoid tumors form a spectrum of neuroendocrine tumors from malignant SCLC to the more benign typical carcinoid. Bronchial carcinoid tumors are usually asymptomatic and discovered on screening chest radiographs [7]. Five-year survival following typical carcinoid resection is over 90%. Metastases are rare with these tumors. These tumors may be associated with the ectopic synthesis of vasoactive mediators and such a phenomenon is labeled as carcinoid syndrome. The occurrence of carcinoid syndrome is less common in SCLC as compared to tumors of gut origin with liver metastases. Resection of bronchial carcinoid tumors rarely leads to intraoperative hemodynamic instability or coronary vasospasm [8]. However, the anesthesiologist should consider specific antagonists such as octreotide to manage refractory intraoperative hypotension [9].
5 Pleural Tumors
The primary pleural tumors are not common and include fibrous tumors of pleura (benign mesotheliomas) and malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). The fibrous tumors may be benign or malignant. The localized large fibrous tumors encroach on the visceral or parietal pleura.
Asbestos exposure is implicated in up to 80% of MPM cases. The window period from exposure to asbestos and tumor manifestation is usually long and thus eliciting history for its causative factor may be missed. The incidence of MPM has been reported to double in the last two decades [2]. MPM invades the visceral and parietal pleura, usually leading to a bloody effusion and exertional dyspnea. The diagnosis requires pleural biopsy and video-assisted thoracoscopy guided biopsy remains the acceptable modality. Diagnosis cannot be confirmed by thoracentesis. The symptom management includes the tapping of pleural fluid and simultaneous talc pleurodesis is performed to minimize the recurrence of the effusion.
MPM is typically refractory to therapy with expected survival under 1 year. Extrapleural pneumonectomy for the early disease may decrease mortality. The management strategies include a multidisciplinary approach including radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and surgery. The surgical intervention includes extrapleural pneumonectomy, which is a major surgery with perioperative complications. In addition to the standard risks of a pneumonectomy, patients are at risk of extensive hemorrhage from dissection of the chest wall and major vessels, as well as the risks of pericardial and diaphragm dissection [10]
6 Preoperative Assessment
Preoperative assessment for surgical intervention for lung cancer surgery requires an understanding of cancer and its effects on body physiology and tools for its assessment. With evolving concepts and tools, thorough updated knowledge is paramount [2]. With the improvement in surgical techniques, a greater number of patients are scheduled for surgical excision of the tumor. The various surgical procedures for lung cancer include “lung-sparing” resections such as sleeve-lobectomies or segmentectomies, with minimally invasive techniques such as video or robotic-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS/RATS). Anesthesiologists need to identify patients at elevated perioperative risk by thorough multimodal assessment and to prepare not only a holistic plan for preoperative optimization but also a strategy for perioperative care. The anesthesiologist must consider the patient’s medical comorbidities and perioperative complications for lung resection [3].
6.1 Assessment of Lung Cancer
The basic assessment tool using “4-Ms” in cancer patients is applicable for lung cancer as well. It needs to be elicited using a thoroughly targeted history, physical examination, and investigations (Box 11.1).
In terms of medications, bleomycin is a commonly used chemotherapeutic agent for germ cell tumors and these patients may be scheduled for lung surgery for metastasectomy. The exposure to bleomycin is associated with pulmonary toxicity which can be exaggerated with a high fraction of inspired oxygen concentrations (FiO2). Risk factors include increased age, renal insufficiency, high inspired fraction of oxygen, fluid overload, and pulmonary fibrosis [11]. The safest strategy in the patient who received bleomycin is to administer the lowest fraction of inspired oxygen in perioperative management with appropriate monitoring. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) need to be avoided in the patient who received cisplatin to avoid renal toxicity.
Box 11.1: Anesthetic Considerations in Lung Cancer Patients (the 4 “Ms”) [2]
-
1.
Mass effects: obstructive pneumonia, lung abscess, superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome, tracheobronchial distortion, Pancoast syndrome, recurrent laryngeal or phrenic nerve paresis, chest wall or mediastinal extension
-
2.
Metabolic effects: Lambert-Eaton syndrome, hypercalcemia, hyponatremia, Cushing syndrome
-
3.
Metastases: brain, bone, liver, adrenal glands
-
4.
Medications: chemotherapy—pulmonary toxicity (bleomycin, mitomycin), cardiac toxicity (doxorubicin), renal toxicity (cisplatin)
6.2 Assessment of Respiratory Function Before Lung Resection
The thorough assessment, optimization, and appropriate planning are important as major respiratory complications like atelectasis, pneumonia, and respiratory failure have been seen in almost 15–20% undergoing lung cancer surgeries. These complications account for 3–4% mortality post lung cancer resection [12]. The assessment should include a detailed history of the patient’s quality of life and objective measures of pulmonary function guide anesthetic management. A single test to predict the perioperative outcome after lung cancer surgery is not known. So, a combination of assessment strategies needs to be used for risk assessment. The “three-legged stool” approach including respiratory mechanics, pulmonary parenchymal function, and cardiorespiratory interaction is one of the useful strategies for assessment before lung cancer surgeries [3].
6.2.1 Lung Mechanical Function
The various respiratory mechanics’ parameters like forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV), and residual volume/total lung capacity ratio (RV/TLC) are useful in predicting postoperative outcomes after lung surgeries. Predicted postoperative FEV1 (ppoFEV1 %) remains an independent predictor of postoperative morbidity and mortality [13, 14], which is calculated as:
-
For lobectomy: ppoFEV1 % = preoperative FEV1 % × (1– # of functional lung segments being removed/total # of functioning lung segments). (Typically, the number of lung segments is divided as follows: right upper lobe 6, right middle lobe 4, right lower lobe 12, left upper lobe 10, left lower lobe 10).
-
For pneumonectomy: ppo FEV1% = preoperative FEV1 × (1 – a fraction of total perfusion of the resected lung)
The American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) guidelines argue that patients with a ppo FEV1 <30% require formal cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) to further stratify risk (Fig. 11.1) [14]. Patients with a PPO FEV1 of 30–60% should undergo a low technology exercise test (stair climb, shuttle walk). Those who can walk greater than 400 m or climb greater than 22 m are deemed low risk. However, patients not attaining these thresholds should undergo formal CPET [14]. Patients with a ppo FEV1 >60% do not require further testing [14]. Patients previously deemed too high risk can be operated on with acceptable morbidity and mortality, ideally using epidural analgesia and VATS approach in a high volume thoracic center [15,16,17]. Emphysematous patients have a lung-volume reduction effect on the residual lobe(s) and may exceed their ppoFEV1 if a hyper-inflated lobe is resected [18].
6.2.2 Parenchymal Lung Function
The assessment for gas exchange capacity of the lung is usually done by measuring the diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO). The DLCO reflects the total functioning surface area of the alveolar-capillary interface. Predicted postoperative (ppo) values are calculated using the same formulae as for the FEV1. Numerous studies have shown that ppo DLCO is an equal or stronger predictor of perioperative morbidity and mortality than ppo FEV1, including in patients with a normal FEV1 [14, 19]. The 2013 ACCP guidelines use the same thresholds for DLCO as for FEV1 to stratify a patient’s perioperative risk and pursue additional investigations (Fig. 11.1) [14]. When there is a discrepancy between the ppo FEV1 and ppo DLCO, the lower of the two values should determine risk [13].
6.2.3 Cardiopulmonary Interaction
The assessment of the cardiopulmonary interaction remains one of the crucial assessments before lung cancer surgeries. The “gold standard” assessment tool for this function is by laboratory exercise [20]. The estimated maximum oxygen consumption (VO2max) as per the patient’s age, sex, and height is no more useful than the absolute value [21].
VO2 max is an excellent tool to predict a patient’s risk of morbidity and mortality post lung resection, independent of FEV1 and DLCO [14, 22, 23]. The ACCP guidelines state that patients with a VO2 max below 10 mL/kg/min have an unacceptably high risk, 10–20 mL/kg/min moderate risk, and >20 mL/kg/min low risk requiring no additional testing [14]. European guidelines recommend performing CPET on all patients with an FEV1 or DLCO <80%, then performing ppo FEV1 and DLCO on patients with values below 20 mL/kg/min [24].
Formal CPET is too time-consuming and expensive for routine use before pulmonary resection. The six-minute walk test (6MWT) is a low-tech assessment of exercise capacity with excellent correlation to VO2 max and similar prognostic value [25, 26]. The 6MWT distance assessment is a valuable tool to estimate the VO2max by dividing by a figure of 30 (i.e., 600 m distance is equivalent to a VO2max of 600/30 = 20 mL/kg/min) [27]. Climbing five flights of stairs correlates with a VO2max >20 mL/kg/min while climbing two flights corresponds to a VO2 max of 12 mL/kg/min. The patient’s inability to climb 2 flights of stairs indicates restricted cardiorespiratory function and surgical management remains extremely high-risk [28, 29].
6.2.4 Ventilation Perfusion Scintigraphy
The ventilation-perfusion (V/Q) lung scanning is an important assessment modality in lung cancer patients scheduled for lung resection surgeries. This aids in the prediction of the post-resection pulmonary function. At times, the lobe or region of the lung involved with cancer may be already non-functional, therefore calculating PPO values based on perfusion rather than lung segments may be more accurate [13, 14]. V/Q scanning is likely more beneficial in pneumonectomy than lobectomy patients [30].
7 Intraoperative Monitoring
Generally, lung cancer resections are major procedures of moderate duration (2–4 h). The patient is positioned in a lateral position with the opening of the hemithorax. Anesthesia induction and airway management are initially done in the supine position, so on turning the patient laterally, the rechecking of monitors and airway is required. Also, the vitals and respiratory parameters should be checked soon after the change of position. The choice of invasive monitoring is usually based on patient assessment but the placement of these invasive monitoring after the positioning of the patient for surgery is difficult. So, in patients with cardiorespiratory compromise, placement of the invasive monitoring like arterial catheter is advisable.
7.1 Oxygenation
Significant desaturation (SpO2 <90%) is seen in almost 1–10% of patients undergoing lung surgeries during one-lung ventilation even with FiO2 of 1 [2]. The arterial PaO2 via arterial blood gases (ABG) provides better oxygenation status as compared to the use of pulse oximeter (SpO2) in these situations. Considering the sigmoidal shape of the oxyhemoglobin dissociation curve, the PaO2 may better indicate how much buffer exists before the patient rapidly desaturates to dangerous levels
7.2 Capnometry
The gradient of arterial (PaCO2) to end-tidal (PETCO2) increases during OLV. The PETCO2 signifies lung perfusion during OLV, though it does not correlate well with the alveolar minute ventilation [31]. The PETCO2 briefly decreases at the initiation of OLV due to a higher ventilation/perfusion ratio to the dependent lung. Subsequently, it tends to increase as hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction (HPV) shunts blood from the non-dependent to the dependent lung. Severe (>5 mmHg) or prolonged falls in PETCO2 is a good indicator of perfusion maldistribution among the two lungs and thus can predict desaturation [2].
7.3 Arterial Line
Surgical compression of major vascular structures may cause sudden decreases in cardiac output manifested as hypotension. This emphasizes the need for arterial line placement for ABG sampling in patients undergoing major lung surgeries. Maintaining a catheter position intraoperatively may be easier in the dependent arm, but using either side is feasible.
7.4 Central Venous Line
The utility of central venous access for purpose of pressure monitoring to guide fluid status remains grossly restricted due to lateral positioning an open chest. It is indeed not an acceptable tool to guide fluid management. However, it provides access for administering vasopressors and inotropes in cases where limited intravenous fluids are administered (e.g., pneumonectomies) or excessive blood loss is anticipated (re-do thoracotomies, decortications).
7.5 Pulmonary Artery Catheters
Intraoperative pulmonary artery (PA) pressure may also not accurately reflect left-heart preload. Given the variable distribution of lung perfusion, the use of thermodilution cardiac output measurements during OLV is controversial [32].
7.6 Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy
The lung surgeries require OLV and thus need airway devices for lung separation like double-lumen tubes or bronchial blockers. The placement of these devices requires flexible bronchoscopic guidance and should be re-confirmed after in the lateral position due to frequent migration of these devices, which can be missed by auscultation alone [33, 34].
7.7 Continuous Spirometry
Side-stream spirometry provides valuable data during OLV including inspiratory and expiratory volumes, pressures, and flow interactions. Sudden discrepancies between inspired and expired tidal volumes may provide an early signal of migration of the lung isolation device, as well as air leaks post lung resection. Auto-PEEP manifests as persistent end-expiratory flow during OLV, with potential hypoxia due to increased shunt to the non-dependent lung and hypotension due to decreased venous return.
7.8 Transesophageal Echocardiography (TEE)
TEE provides a dynamic monitor of myocardial function and cardiac preload, which may be more reliable than other hemodynamic monitors [35]. Potential indications for TEE during lung cancer surgery include hemodynamic instability, pericardial effusions, cardiac involvement by a tumor, air emboli, and detecting a patent foramen ovale during refractory hypoxemia.
8 Lung Isolation
The OLV is required for lung surgeries for various reasons including better surgical exposure, prevention of contralateral lung soiling from blood, infected material, whole lung lavage, and isolate ventilation in cases of bronchopleural fistula, tracheobronchial trauma, and severe bullous disease [36]. At times, in conditions like lung transplantation or pulmonary thromboendarterectomy, lung isolation aids in the provision of differential ventilation to lungs to avoid unilateral reperfusion injury. The methods for lung isolation include double-lumen tubes (DLTs), bronchial blockers, or single-lumen endobronchial tubes (SLTs) (Table 11.1).
8.1 Double-Lumen Tubes
The most common technique for lung isolation is with a DLT, which contains both endotracheal and endobronchial lumens with corresponding cuffs capable of isolating the right or left lung. Table 11.2 lists the different sizes of DLTs, corresponding fiberoptic bronchoscope size, and comparable SLT diameter.
8.1.1 Size Selection
Ideally, the bronchial lumen of the left-sided DLT should be 1–2 mm smaller in diameter than the patient’s left mainstem bronchus (LMSB) to accommodate the bronchial cuff. In addition to reviewing chest imaging to detect abnormal airway anatomy, a simplified guide can assist appropriate DLT sizing (Table 11.3) [37].
8.1.2 DLT Placement Method
The various methods have been described in the literature for DLT placement. The traditional blind technique of DLT placement includes placing it using the direct laryngoscopy method and when once the endobronchial cuff crosses the vocal cords, the DLT is turned 90–180° counterclockwise (for a left-sided DLT placement) and advancing it further to place it in the bronchial lumen in the left mainstem bronchus (LMSB). Since the diameter at the level of the cricoid ring is not smaller than that of LMSB, so the DLT should negotiate the site without obstruction if an appropriate size DLT is selected [38]. In the direct vision technique, the placement of DLT in the respective bronchial lumen is guided by a flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope once the initial placement is across the glottis. Bronchoscopy must ultimately confirm placement with either technique.
8.1.3 Right-Sided Double-Lumen Tubes
The left-sided DLT is mostly used for lung surgeries. However, in some specific situations, a right-sided DLT is required [39] (Box 11.2). The right-sided DLT cuff is different from the left-sided DLT cuff due to the anatomy of the right bronchus. The right mainstem bronchus is shorter and the right upper lobe originates only 1.5–2 cm from the carina. Given this anatomical variation, to keep the right upper lobe patent for ventilation, the cuff of right-sided DLT has a slot [40] (Fig. 11.2).
Box 11.2: Indications for a Right-Sided Double-Lumen Tube [2]
-
Distorted anatomy of the entrance of left mainstem bronchus
-
External or intraluminal tumor compression
-
Descending thoracic aortic aneurysm
-
-
Site of surgery involving the left mainstem bronchus
-
Left lung transplantation
-
Left-sided tracheobronchial disruption
-
Left-sided pneumonectomya
-
aIt is possible to manage a left pneumonectomy with a left-sided DLT or bronchial blocker; however, the DLT or bronchial blocker has to be withdrawn before stapling the mainstem bronchus
8.2 Bronchial Blockers
Bronchial blockers occlude the mainstem bronchus of the operative lung to allow distal lung collapse. More distal placement can achieve selective lobar collapse. Currently, available devices are either within a modified SLT (Torque Control Blocker Univent®; Vitaid, Lewiston, NY) or are used independently within (intraluminal/coaxial) a conventional SLT: the Arndt® wire-guided endobronchial blocker (Cook Critical Care, Bloomington, IN), the Cohen® tip-deflecting endobronchial blocker (Cook Critical Care, Bloomington, IN), the Fuji Uniblocker® (Vitaid, Lewiston, NY), and the EZ Blocker® with right and left mainstem balloons sitting at the carina (Teleflex, Dresden, Germany) (Fig. 11.3).
Bronchial blockers are a good alternative to DLT in situations of the difficult airway, contralateral pulmonary resection, or anticipated need for postoperative mechanical ventilation. The Cohen and Fuji Uniblocker can also be placed extra-luminal in patients with small airway dimensions (pediatrics or tracheostomy sites).
Table 11.4 describes the characteristics of current bronchial blockers. For standard 9-Fr blockers, an ETT greater than or equal to 7.0 mm ID can be used with a bronchoscope less than 4.0 mm in diameter. Larger bronchoscopes require greater than 7.5 mm ID. Prior lubrication of the blocker is essential.
Current evidence shows that compared to double-lumen tubes, bronchial blockers require slightly more time for insertion, provide comparable timing and quality of lung isolation, decrease the risk of sore throat and airway trauma, but require more frequent repositioning which may affect surgical exposure [41,42,43]. The inflated balloon may lodge in the trachea, causing complete airway obstruction and potential cardiorespiratory arrest unless the blocker is immediately deflated [44]. The presence of abnormal airway anatomy or inadequate seal within the bronchus has been reported for the failure of this device [45]. Clear communication about the placement of blockers should be ensured with surgeons to prevent surgical stapling during lung resection [46].
8.3 Endobronchial Tubes
The use of single-lumen tubes (SLT) for OLV requires advancing tube in the respective bronchus under flexible bronchoscope guidance. This technique is usually reserved for difficult airways, carinal resection, post-pneumonectomy, or uncuffed SLTs in small children.
8.4 Difficult Airways and Lung Isolation
Patients requiring OLV may present with an anticipated or unanticipated difficult airway. Carcinoma of the head and neck with previous radiation or surgical resection may greatly complicate lung isolation. Anatomy may be distorted in the distal airways due to compression by a thoracic aortic aneurysm or an obstructing tumor near the tracheobronchial bifurcation.
Difficult airways should be secured with an SLT by awake fiberoptic intubation or asleep intubation with airway adjuncts immediately available. Under general anesthesia, lung isolation can subsequently be achieved by passing a bronchial blocker, advancing the SLT into the mainstem bronchus, or changing the SLT to a DLT over an airway exchange catheter (through the bronchial lumen) with visualization by video laryngoscopy. A 14 Fr exchange catheter should be used for 41 Fr and 39 Fr DLTs; for 37 Fr or 35 Fr DLTs, an 11 Fr exchange catheter is required. Soft tipped exchange catheters may be less traumatic (e.g., Cook Exchange Catheter, Cook Critical Care, Bloomington, IN).
8.5 Summary
The “ABCs” of lung isolation are:
-
Anatomy—The understanding of the tracheobronchial airway anatomy is essential for ensuring the appropriate placement of airway devices for achieving OLV [47].
-
Bronchoscopy—The fundamental knowledge and skill of the use of fiberoptic bronchoscopy for positioning and correctly identifying the correct placement of lung isolation devices is mandatory. The virtual online bronchoscopy simulator is available to familiarize themselves with the lung isolation devices (www.thoracicanesthesia.com).
-
Chest imaging—The airway imaging basics should also be clear to anesthesiologists involved in providing OLV. Known airway abnormalities can guide optimal methods for lung isolation.
9 One-Lung Ventilation
9.1 Hypoxic Pulmonary Vasoconstriction (HPV)
In response to low alveolar oxygen tension (PAO2), hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction (HPV) diverts pulmonary blood to well-ventilated lung regions to optimize ventilation/perfusion matching [48]. HPV decreases perfusion to the non-ventilated lung by approximately 50% [49]. HPV has a biphasic temporal response to alveolar hypoxia, plateauing at 20–30 min then again at approximately two hours [50]. The biphasic offset of HPV implies surgeries where bilateral thoracic surgeries are being performed and the collapse of the contralateral lung is required. Pre-conditioning leads to a greater response to a second hypoxic challenge [51].
All volatile anesthetics, especially older agents, inhibit HPV in a dose-dependent manner (halothane > enflurane > isoflurane) [52]. In doses under 1 MAC, current volatiles (isoflurane, sevoflurane, and desflurane) are weak and equipotent inhibitors of HPV [53,54,55]. Theoretically, the volatile agent can only access the hypoxic lung pulmonary capillaries during its return through mixed venous blood. Total intravenous anesthesia does not provide superior oxygenation than modern volatile anesthetics provided less than 1 MAC is used [56, 57]. Nitrous oxide is generally avoided in thoracic anesthesia because it can increase postoperative atelectasis and increase pulmonary pressures (inhibit HPV) [2].
9.2 Acute Lung Injury
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), also known as acute lung injury (ALI), is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality after thoracic surgery [2, 58]. Its incidence of post-thoracotomy is 4–15% and associated mortality is up to 40% [58, 59]. The consensus “Berlin Definition” for ARDS defines mild, moderate, and severe ARDS, which apply post lung resection [60]. Risk factors for ALI post lung resection include peak airway pressures >40 mmHg, plateau airway pressures >29 mmHg, pneumonectomy, excessive intravenous fluids, and preoperative alcohol abuse [61].
The pathophysiology of ALI post OLV mirrors that of ARDS [62]. Modifiable triggers, including barotrauma, volutrauma, atelectrauma, hyperoxia, surgical manipulation, and ischemia-reperfusion, contribute to the inflammatory response capable of causing multiorgan failure [58]. Therefore, an expanding body of literature guides anesthetic interventions that mitigate the risk of postoperative ALI, most notably “lung-protective ventilation.”
9.3 Tidal Volumes
Low tidal volume ventilation (4–6 mL/kg of ideal body weight—IBW) compared to conventional high tidal volume ventilation (10–12 mL/kg IBW) during OLV decreases the incidence of ALI post lung cancer resection, especially pneumonectomy [59, 61,62,63,64,65,66]. To decrease the risk of barotrauma and volutrauma, ventilation should be with a tidal volume of 4–6 mL/kg of IBW during OLV and 6–8 mL/kg of IBW during TLV [62].
9.4 Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP)
There is no consensus for optimal PEEP during OLV because patients sit at various points on the alveolar compliance curve. However, in most patients, PEEP is a crucial component of lung-protective ventilation. Inadequate PEEP can de-recruit the dependent lung and cause intraoperative hypoxia and atelectrauma. Excessive PEEP can divert blood to the operative lung and increase shunt fraction. Auto-PEEP averages 4–6 cm H2O in lung cancer patients and is likely higher in emphysema [2]. Its measurement involves an end-expiratory hold, typically with an ICU ventilator. It is recommended to begin OLV with a PEEP of 3–10 cm H2O, titrating to oxygenation and monitoring for inadequate expiration. Patients with COPD often require lower or zero PEEP [62].
9.5 Airway Pressures
While there are no clear thresholds for safety, minimizing peak and plateau airway pressures during OLV are key strategies to reduce the risk of lung stress. A recent review recommends maintaining peak airway pressure below 30 cm H2O and plateau pressures below 20 cm H2O [62].
9.6 Alveolar Recruitment Maneuvers (ARM)
To decrease atelectasis and shunt fraction, it is recommended to perform an ARM at a pressure of 30 cm H2O for at least 10 s at the onset of OLV [67]. Additional ARMs should be performed as needed to improve oxygenation and optimize PEEP.
9.7 Fraction of Inspired Oxygen (FIO2)
Reactive oxygen species are a known contributor to the inflammatory cascade preceding acute lung injury [58]. While an FIO2 of 1.0 is recommended before lung isolation to decrease atelectasis, thereafter the minimal FIO2 required to maintain a saturation of 92–96% should be used. Hyperoxia is particularly toxic as a component of ischemia-reperfusion injury. Therefore initial re-expansion of the operative lung should be performed with the lowest FIO2 possible [62].
9.8 Ventilation Mode
Despite being associated with a lower peak airway pressure, pressure-controlled ventilation (PCV) does not improve oxygenation compared to volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) [2]. It is reasonable to use either mode, recognizing that with PCV tidal volumes can vary drastically.
9.9 Maintenance of Anesthesia
Studies demonstrate that volatile anesthetics (desflurane and sevoflurane) enhance ischemic preconditioning and attenuate lung injury in OLV compared to propofol infusion [58]. Therefore, anesthesia should be maintained with volatile anesthetics during OLV unless contraindications exist.
9.10 Postoperative Care
Chest physiotherapy, incentive spirometry, and early mobility are crucial in minimizing postoperative pulmonary complications. Early extubation minimizes the risk of ventilator acquired pneumonia (VAP). Acute respiratory failure is managed supportively (oxygenation, ventilation, antibiotics if indicated) to support vital organs while minimizing further lung damage [2].
9.11 Hypoxemia During One-Lung Ventilation
Hypoxemia during OLV is rapid and predictable in most cases (Box 11.3) [68]. Patients with long-standing unilateral disease tolerate OLV relatively well with the decreased shunt. Right-sided procedures usually have a larger shunt and hypoxemia during OLV because the right lung normally receives 10% more perfusion than the left [69]. Patients with obstructive airway disease may tolerate OLV better than restrictive lung disease due to auto-PEEP [2]. For bilateral pulmonary surgery such as metastectomies, it is recommended to operate on the lung with better ventilation (usually the right) first because surgical trauma temporarily impairs gas exchange [70].
Box 11.3: Risk Factors for Oxygen Desaturation During One-Lung Ventilation [2]
-
1.
Relatively high ventilation or perfusion (VQ) to the operative lung on the preoperative VQ scan
-
2.
Low PaO2 during two-lung ventilation, including while in the lateral position
-
3.
Right-sided procedure
-
4.
Normal preoperative FEV1 or FVC
-
5.
Supine position during one-lung ventilation
Management of hypoxemia during OLV should follow a sequence of steps tailored to the individual patient, procedure, and acuity (Box 11.4). These measures can be used prophylactically in high-risk patients.
Box 11.4: Treatments for Oxygen Desaturation During One-Lung Ventilation [2]
-
Severe desaturation:
-
Resume two-lung ventilation on FIO2 of 1.0 (if possible)
-
-
Gradual desaturation
-
Increase FIO2 to 1.0
-
Verify the position of lung isolation device with fiberoptic bronchoscopy
-
Optimize cardiac output—inotropes/vasopressors, ensure volatile <1 MAC, minimize IVC compression by the surgeon
-
Recruitment maneuver to the ventilated lung (may briefly increase shunt to non-dependent lung)
-
Apply PEEP at ≥5 cm H2O to the ventilated lung (after a recruitment maneuver; except in patients with emphysema)
-
Apply CPAP 1–2 cm H2O and FIO2 1.0 to the non-ventilated lung (after recruitment)
-
Intermittent re-inflation of the non-ventilated lung
-
Partial ventilation techniques of the non-ventilated lung
-
Passive oxygenation
-
Lobar insufflation (see Fig. 11.4)
-
-
Lobar collapse (with a bronchial blocker)
-
Surgical obstruction of blood flow to operative lung
-
IVC, inferior vena cava; PEEP, positive end-expiratory pressure; CPAP, continuous positive airway pressure
PEEP to the dependent lung is as effective as CPAP to the non-dependent lung for increasing PaO2 levels during OLV [71]. CPAP can be applied through a DLT or bronchial blocker and interferes less in open than thoracoscopic surgery [72].
In refractory hypoxemia, intermittent partial ventilation of the operative lung can be administered through the DLT or blocker lumen. Selective insufflation of non-operative segments of the surgical lung is possible by directing the bronchoscope tip into such segments and intermittently compressing the suction port attached to oxygen tubing flowing at 5 L/min (Fig. 11.4) [73]. This technique is particularly useful in thoracoscopic surgery where surgical exposure is more affected by lung recruitment. A third technique is to selectively collapse the surgical lobe by the placement of a bronchial blocker into that lobar bronchus through an SLT or a DLT [74]. To limit shunt, the surgeon can obstruct blood flow to the non-ventilated lung, temporarily in emergencies or definitively in pneumonectomy or lung transplantation [75].
Avoiding potent vasodilators such as nitroglycerin, halothane, and large doses of volatiles will improve oxygenation during OLV [2]. Intravenous almitrine enhances HPV, prevents, and treats hypoxemia during OLV when anesthesia is maintained with propofol [76,77,78]. Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) combined with intravenous phenylephrine improves oxygenation in ventilated intensive care unit patients with ARDS, which may translate to OLV [79].
10 Intravenous Fluid Management
Due to hydrostatic effects, endothelial and lymphatic dysfunction, intravenous fluids during lung cancer resection may lead to increased shunt and pulmonary edema of the dependent lung. Excessive intravenous fluids are a well-established risk factor for postoperative acute lung injury, especially in pneumonectomy (Box 11.5) [59, 61, 80,81,82].
Box 11.5: Fluid Management Recommendations in Pulmonary Resection [2]
-
Postoperative fluid balance in the first 24 h less than +20 mL/kg
-
Administer under 3L of crystalloid to the typical adult patient in the first 24 postoperative hours
-
Do not replace theoretical third-space losses
-
Do not strive for urine output over 0.5 mL/kg/h
-
Postoperatively, consider treating hypotension or hypoperfusion with inotropes rather than intravenous fluids
11 Surgical Procedures
11.1 Flexible Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy
Flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy is performed perioperatively to confirm the cancer diagnosis, determine airway invasion by the tumor, and intraoperatively to verify airway anatomy during a test clamp of the surgical bronchus. Options include awake vs. general anesthesia and oral vs. nasal approaches. Effective topical anesthesia is crucial for the awake approach, with or without sedation or antisialogogues. Under general anesthesia, advantages of a supraglottic airway (SGA) technique include visualization of the vocal cords and subglottic structures, lower airway resistance versus an endotracheal tube, and the potential to maintain spontaneous ventilation in a patient with a difficult airway [83].
11.2 Rigid Bronchoscopy
Interventional rigid bronchoscopy with laser, tracheobronchial dilation, or stent placement is a common treatment of airway malignancies [84]. There are five basic methods of ventilation for rigid bronchoscopy:
-
1.
Spontaneous ventilation—adults are much less likely than children to breathe effectively under this deep anesthetic
-
2.
Apneic oxygenation (high flow nasal prongs)—requires thorough pre-oxygenation; still requires frequent surgical pauses for ventilation to clear CO2 and maintain oxygen saturation
-
3.
Positive pressure ventilation via a ventilating bronchoscope—attach the anesthesia circuit to a side port on the rigid bronchoscope; surgeon usually must interrupt the procedure and occlude the eyepiece; consider throat packs to limit air leaks.
-
4.
Jet ventilation—via a handheld injector or with a high-frequency ventilator; risk of barotrauma and pneumothorax
-
5.
Intermittent rigid bronch removal—ventilate by bag-mask ventilation, SGA, or ETT
These techniques are most useful with total intravenous anesthesia (often propofol and remifentanil) because volatile anesthetics involve unpredictable dosing and environmental contamination. It is crucial to maintain a deep plane of anesthesia, often with muscle relaxation, to mitigate risks of awareness, laryngospasm, bronchospasm, hemorrhage, and perforation in a tenuous, unprotected airway. In cases where a neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet (Nd: YAG) laser is used, the inspired fraction of oxygen should be limited to mitigate the risk of airway fire. At induction, the surgeon must be present and prepared to establish airway control with the rigid bronchoscope. Effective team communication is paramount. Consider serial arterial blood gases to monitor oxygenation and ventilation. Highly edematous airways may require systemic steroids, helium, racemic epinephrine, or intubation at the end of the case [2].
11.3 Mediastinoscopy
Cervical mediastinoscopy is the traditional method for staging mediastinal lymph nodes in NSCLC. Chest imaging should be carefully reviewed preoperatively to assess airway compromise. Given the risks of coughing during this stimulating procedure, patients are typically managed with a deep general anesthetic, including paralysis, with an SLT. To monitor innominate artery compression and cerebral hypoperfusion, the pulse oximeter is typically placed on the right hand with the blood pressure cuff on the left arm.
The most feared complication of mediastinoscopy is hemorrhage. When mild this usually responds to tamponade by the surgeon, head-up position, and avoiding hypertension. Severe hemorrhage requires emergency management including invasive hemodynamic monitoring, volume and possibly blood transfusion (consider lower body venous access), and thoracotomy or sternotomy. Lung isolation can be achieved with a bronchial blocker or double-lumen tube [2]. Other potential complications include airway obstruction, pneumothorax, recurrent laryngeal or phrenic nerve injuries, esophageal injury, chylothorax, and air embolism [85].
11.4 Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy
Endobronchial ultrasound-guided biopsy (EBUS) has replaced mediastinoscopy for preoperative lung cancer staging [2, 86]. EBUS employs a radial probe through a channel of the fiberoptic bronchoscope to allow fine needle aspiration under direct vision [87]. In general, these patients are managed in a bronchoscopy suite with topical anesthesia, intravenous sedation, and possibly an anesthesiologist, depending on the complexity of the case.
11.5 Minimally Invasive Thoracoscopic Surgery
Advantages of pulmonary resection by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), compared to open thoracotomy, include: (1) decreased pulmonary complications and mortality in high-risk patients, (2) reduced hospital length of stay, (3) less blood loss and transfusion, (4) less pain (less rib spreading), (5) improvement in pulmonary function, (6) less atrial fibrillation, and (7) less inflammatory response [17, 88,89,90,91]. VATS lobectomy is performed with a limited number of incisions, the largest approximately 5 cm in length [92]. Bilateral VATS metastectomies may be performed in the supine position. The anesthesiologist must discuss with the surgeon the potential for conversion to open thoracotomy. While most VATS procedures are done under general anesthesia with lung isolation, minor procedures can be done under intercostal blocks or thoracic epidural with TLV [93, 94].
11.6 Robotic-Assisted Thoracic Surgery
Robotic thoracic surgery has been a logical advancement of VATS due to the perceived improve 3D vision and instrument mobility in the chest [95]. Anesthetic considerations are outlined in Box 11.6.
Box 11.6: Anesthetic Considerations for Robotic Thoracic Surgery [2]
-
Establish a protocol for immediate undocking (<60 s) of the robot in case of intraoperative emergency
-
Given limited patient access, confirm the position of the lung isolation device before docking the robot
-
Extensions to intravascular lines and anesthesia circuit
-
Increased intrathoracic CO2 insufflation with hypercarbia and hemodynamic compromise
-
Take measures to prevent movement of the OR table during the robotic procedure
-
Risk of neuropathies if lateral position prolonged
-
Judicious intravenous fluids
11.7 Lobectomy
Lobectomy is the standard approach to lung cancer resection to reduce local recurrence. Lobectomy is being increasingly performed via a VATS approach vs. an open thoracotomy. The local invasion may be required that an elective lobectomy be converted intraoperatively to a bi-lobectomy (right lung) or pneumonectomy (left lung). Surgeons may request that a variable degree of positive airway pressure be used to assess the integrity of the bronchial stump. Uncomplicated patients can usually be extubated in the operating room [2].
Sleeve lobectomy is a parenchyma-sparing mainstem bronchial resection, typically for bronchogenic carcinoma. This technique has lower morbidity and mortality as compared to pneumonectomy in patients with lung cancer [96, 97]. The airway management requires the placement of a contralateral DLT or an endobronchial tube. For carinal resections, options include cross-field ventilation with a sterile circuit and endobronchial tube or high-frequency jet ventilation. For resection of major vessels, heparinization may be necessary. Hence, epidural catheter manipulation needs to be avoided for around 24 h. During pulmonary arterioplasty, massive hemorrhage may occur.
11.8 Pneumonectomy
Pneumonectomy for lung cancers requires posterolateral thoracotomy. After removing the lung, it is crucial to test for air leaks from the lung before reconstructing the bronchial stump which should be kept shorter to minimize the accumulation of secretions. The empty thoracic cavity after pneumonectomy remains a potential source of complications like a mediastinal shift with hemodynamic collapse. Surgical drain and application of suction may lead to exacerbation of mediastinal shift. The management of post-pneumonectomy thoracic space is not well elucidated. The management options for preventing complications related to the empty thoracic space include either not placing a chest tube or placing a dedicated post-pneumonectomy chest drainage system. This is a specially designed drain which has both high- and low-pressure under-water relief valves and thus prevents mediastinum shift [2]. A postoperative chest X-ray should be done after pneumonectomy.
Pneumonectomy carries significantly greater risk than a lobectomy. The perioperative mortality rate after pneumonectomy for NSCLC is approximately 5–8% [98, 99]. The risk of complications increases with lesser surgical case volume and patients more than 65 years of age [100]. The risk of complications increases fivefold in patients over age 65. The greatest morbidity post pneumonectomy is ALI, with an incidence of 4–18% and mortality greater than 50% [58, 66]. The risk is greater after right-sided pneumonectomy due to increased pulmonary vascular resistance and right ventricular failure after right pulmonary artery ligation [101].
Airway management strategy includes the use of a DLT on the contralateral side. In case same sided DLT is required, then it should be withdrawn during bronchial stapling. Extubation should be done after surgery and postoperative mechanical ventilation should be avoided to prevent the dehiscence of the bronchial stump. Anesthetic strategies to mitigate the risk of perioperative acute lung injury (ALI) are especially critical to pneumonectomy patients (see Sects. 11.9 and 11.10). The preventive strategies include lower tidal volumes, airway pressures along with an optimal PEEP and FiO2. The fluid management should be done judiciously using restrictive fluid administration (prevention of fluid overload) and judicious vasopressors/inotropes to maintain hemodynamics if required.
Extrapleural pneumonectomy is typically performed for malignant pleural mesothelioma but may have a role in the pleural spread of other cancers [102]. This is an extensive procedure requiring clearance of lymph nodes, pericardium, diaphragm, parietal pleura, and chest wall. The key points for anesthetic management include the potential for significant bleeding, coagulopathy, and appropriate blood product use. Postoperative cardiac herniation can cause severe hemodynamic instability. In cases of postoperative mechanical ventilation due to extensive surgery, a single endotracheal tube should replace the DLT at the end of the surgery.
11.9 Limited Pulmonary Resections: Segmentectomy and Wedge Resection
Segmentectomy in lung cancer patients refers to resection of a segment of the lung lobe along with its artery, vein, and bronchus. It is an indicated technique in primary lung cancer patients with limited cardiorespiratory reserves. The other pulmonary resection includes wedge resection which is a non-anatomical resection of the part of lung parenchyma having the tumor lesion. These types of resections are usually reserved for the patient with associated comorbidities and peripherally located tumor masses [2]. Limited resections are best performed for peripheral cancers, especially in patients with previous contralateral pulmonary resections [2]. The principles of perioperative care including anesthetic management remain the same as for other major lung resections with the additional strategy for management of associated comorbidities. A selective lobar collapse with a bronchial blocker may be considered in patients with poor cardiorespiratory reserves [103].
12 Postoperative Analgesia
Various sensory afferents transmit nociception following thoracotomy. The pain generators during thoracotomy for lung cancers are intercostal nerves T4-6 due to surgical incision; vagus nerve due to surgical handling of pleura; phrenic nerve due to the handling of diaphragmatic pleura; and brachial plexus [104]. Therefore, analgesia should be multimodal. Compared to thoracotomy, there is very little consensus on analgesic techniques for VATS procedures [105, 106]. Effective perioperative analgesia is crucial for the prevention of pulmonary complications and chronic post-thoracotomy pain and a multimodal approach of analgesics is preferred [107].
12.1 Systemic Medications
12.1.1 Opioids
The patients of cancer may have basal pain and may be managed using pharmacological agents as per pain assessment and its severity. The surgical interventions require additional analgesics. Cautious use of opioids is desirable to avoid respiratory sedation in lung cancer patients after lung resections. The dynamic nature of pain due to breathing movements needs to be managed using appropriate measures [108].
12.1.2 Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs)
NSAIDs and acetaminophen remain an important component of the perioperative analgesia in lung cancer patients. It has an opioid-sparing effect and is devoid of respiratory depressive effect. These agents are effective for ipsilateral shoulder pain frequently missed by epidural analgesia. The side effects of NSAIDs platelet dysfunction, gastric erosions, increased bronchial reactivity, and renal dysfunction need to be kept in mind when being used in patients for pain management [2]. Acetaminophen has weak COX inhibition and remains useful with a good safety profile for analgesia [109].
12.1.3 Ketamine
Ketamine is an NMDA antagonist with an established role in multimodal post-thoracotomy analgesia through both intravenous and epidural routes. However, the evidence is mixed on its ability to prevent chronic post-thoracotomy pain [110]. Potential psychomimetic effects can be minimized by using sub-anesthetic doses and supplementing with benzodiazepines.
12.2 Local Anesthetic Drugs and Regional Nerve Blocks
12.2.1 Intercostal Nerve Blocks
Intercostal nerve blocks remain an easy and effective analgesic technique for thoracotomies or VATS. The block can be administered either percutaneously or under direct vision during surgical exposure. Ultrasound has emerged as an important modality for these blocks. These are good for acute pain but may be limited by short duration. The use of a continuous approach using catheter placement is reported but catheter placement is difficult [111]. Also, the systemic absorption remains a concern and thus doses should be appropriately calculated.
12.2.2 Epidural Analgesia
Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) technique is one of the most studied, well-proven, and considered as the gold standard techniques for the management of pain during thoracotomy [12, 112]. While the paramedian approach may facilitate insertion, ultrasound guidance has not established its place for mid-thoracic epidurals [113]. Local anesthetics and opioids (e.g., sufentanil or fentanyl) synergistically improve perioperative analgesia [114]. More hydrophilic opioids such as morphine should be considered for procedures spanning a large number of dermatomes due to greater CSF spread. Fortunately, bupivacaine 0.25% via TEA does not impair respiratory mechanics, including patients with severe COPD [115].
There is an ongoing debate about the merits of TEA for VATS procedures. Despite smaller incisions, patients report a similar rate of chronic postoperative pain to thoracotomy. This may be related to similar intercostal nerve trauma [116]. Current evidence does not support a single regional analgesic strategy for VATS procedures [106]. Patients with low pulmonary reserve, chronic pain issues, or a high chance of converting to a thoracotomy may benefit most from TEA.
12.2.3 Paravertebral Block
Paravertebral blockade (PVB) involves the injection into a wedge-shaped potential space bordered anteriorly by the parietal pleura, medially by the vertebral bodies and intervertebral foramen, and posteriorly by the superior costotransverse ligament. Local anesthetics cause ipsilateral somatic and sympathetic blockade of multiple spinal levels [117]. Co-administration of paravertebral dexmedetomidine can augment analgesia [107]. The block can be performed under direct vision by the surgeon and/or a percutaneous approach from behind the patient, usually with catheter placement to prolong analgesia. Ultrasound guidance for the percutaneous approach has the potential to increase efficacy and decrease complications such as pneumothorax [118, 119].
For thoracotomy, multiple studies claim that PVB provides comparable analgesia to TEA with fewer complications including hypotension, urinary retention, nausea and vomiting, block failure, arrhythmia, ICU admission, and neuraxial hematoma [120,121,122]. However, a recent Cochrane Review demonstrated that compared to TEA, PVB is associated with comparable perioperative mortality and major complications [123]. The relative impact on postoperative respiratory function and chronic pain is unclear [120, 121, 123, 124]. For VATS procedures, single-shot paravertebral local anesthetics can reduce pain for up to six hours [125].
12.2.4 Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) Block
ESP block has emerged as an effective fascial plane block in recent times with potential application to acute pain management for both thoracotomy and VATS procedures (Fig. 11.5) [126]. It involves ultrasound-guided injection of local anesthetics into the tissue plane deep to the erector spinae muscle superficial to the transverse process to cover the dorsal and ventral rami of thoracic spinal nerves [127].
12.3 Postoperative Pain Management Problems
12.3.1 Shoulder Pain
Postoperative ipsilateral shoulder pain is very common after VATS and thoracotomy, even with a functioning epidural. It is thought to be caused primarily by diaphragmatic irritation referred to by phrenic nerve afferents [109]. Other causes of shoulder pain should be considered, including chest drains placed too deeply, inadequate coverage of the posterior thoracotomy incision by TEA, chronic pain, and referred pain from myocardial ischemia [2].
Pre-emptive acetaminophen decreases postoperative shoulder pain scores [109]. Increasing epidural medications is usually ineffective. Low volume interscalene block and phrenic nerve injection are effective but carry significant respiratory risks [104, 128]. Otherwise systemic opioids and/or NSAIDs should be considered.
12.3.2 Opioid Tolerant Patients
Opioid tolerant patients present significant challenges in lung cancer surgery. Patients may be using prescribed opioids for thoracic pathology, other chronic pain syndromes, be active narcotic abusers, or in rehabilitation receiving daily methadone. Patients should take their regular analgesics perioperatively, otherwise, substitute opioids must be provided. Perioperative opioid requirements are variably increased.
Multimodal analgesia is optimal. Typically, both epidural and systemic opioids are increased to mitigate withdrawal. Fixed dosing is likely superior to patient-controlled techniques, which can lead to the escalation of doses and challenges discharging patients. It is crucial to set realistic expectations that pain scores will be limited by baseline pain levels. Supplemental analgesia options include adding epinephrine 5 ug/mL to the epidural solution and low dose intravenous ketamine [129].
12.4 Postoperative Complications
12.4.1 Empyema
Empyema is one of the postoperative complications after lung surgeries and is observed in 2–16% of cases of lung cancer resections. It is associated with increased mortality by around 40% as well which is more commonly seen in patients who develop a bronchopleural fistula [2]. Treatment options for empyema include open or VATS decortication, open window thoracostomy, and in less severe cases, tube drainage and systemic antibiotics [130].
Anesthetic management for invasive procedures includes early lung isolation in the supine position to protect from contralateral soiling. A DLT is preferable to facilitate bilateral pulmonary toileting. The risk of massive hemorrhage mandates large-bore IV access, an arterial line, and potentially a central venous line for vasopressors. Patients frequently present with sepsis. Therefore, one must carefully weigh the risks and benefits of a thoracic epidural.
12.4.2 Bronchopleural Fistula
A bronchopleural fistula (BPF) may be caused by (1) rupture of a lung abscess or airway into the pleural space, (2) erosion by cancer or inflammation, or (3) dehiscence of a bronchial stump suture line. BPF occurs in 4–20% of pneumonectomy patients compared to <1% of lobectomy patients, with a mortality of up to 70% [131, 132]. BPF is a clinical diagnosis which may include acute dyspnea, subcutaneous emphysema, persistent air leak, contralateral deviation of the trachea, and purulent drainage. The diagnosis is confirmed by bronchoscopy, and less commonly bronchography, sinograms, indicator injection into the pleural space, or inhaled gases to detect transfer across the fistula [133].
Early post-pneumonectomy BPF can be life-threatening and require re-suturing of the bronchial stump. Late post-pneumonectomy BPF is managed with chest tube drainage or a Clagett procedure, which also includes a muscle flap to reinforce the stump. In non-pneumonectomy cases, if the lung fully expands, chest tube suction can usually resolve the air leak. However, in large fistulae with a persistent pneumothorax, surgical resection is usually necessary. Non-surgical treatments include OLV and differential lung ventilation, including high-frequency ventilation, PEEP to the pleural cavity equal to intrathoracic PEEP, unidirectional chest tube valves, and one-way endobronchial valves (for patients unfit for surgery) [134].
Preoperatively, a large BPF is detected through continuous air bubbling through the chest drain or discrepancies in inhaled versus exhaled tidal volumes through spirometry in an intubated patient. The larger the leak, the more crucial it is to establish early and effective lung isolation.
A pre-induction chest drain is mandatory. The main anesthetic goal is to achieve lung isolation before positive pressure ventilation to minimize the risk of tension pneumothorax and contamination of the contralateral lung. One general option is to maintain spontaneous ventilation, either through an inhalational induction, titrated intravenous induction, or awake fiberoptic intubation with airway topicalization. Another general option is to perform “rapid sequence lung isolation,” which includes thorough pre-oxygenation, pre-calculated doses of induction drugs and muscle relaxants, then immediate intubation without bag-mask ventilation. Patients are likely to desaturate rapidly and subsequent bag-mask ventilation can be ineffective due to oxygen passing through the fistula instead of the contralateral lung. Therefore, the “rapid sequence” method should be reserved for experienced hands with airway adjuncts (e.g., video laryngoscope) in patients with generally reassuring airway exams.
A DLT is ideal for lung isolation, airway toileting, and visualization of the affected bronchus, but likely too traumatic for awake fiberoptic intubation. Patients with difficult airways may be better managed with a single-lumen awake intubation, with either a contralateral endobronchial tube or a bronchial blocker pushed into the affected bronchus. Airway placement should always be guided by bronchoscopy to ensure accuracy and minimize trauma. Bronchial blockers are generally not compatible with the bronchial stump post pneumonectomy. Early extubation avoids prolonged positive pressure to the stump.
The thoracic epidural anesthesia with intravenous sedation has been used for minimally invasive BPF repair post pneumonectomy [135]. Pitfalls include incomplete visceral coverage by the epidural and potential contamination of unprotected contralateral airways. An alternative method is high-frequency oscillatory ventilation with permissive hypercapnia, which can minimize barotrauma to the non-operative lung, decrease bronchopleural fistula air leak, and optimize the operative outcome [136].
12.4.3 Atrial Fibrillation
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is one of the common cardiac complications and is seen in almost 46% post pneumonectomy patients [137]. Theoretical mechanisms include surgical inflammation, catecholamine surge, myocardial ischemia, and autonomic imbalance [138]. Postoperative AF is associated with increased length/cost of hospital stay, morbidity, mortality, and stroke risk [139, 140].
A recent systematic review and meta-analysis determined that the most effective pharmacologic AF prophylaxis, in descending order, is through: beta-blockers > ACE inhibitors > amiodarone > magnesium > statins > calcium channel blockers > digoxin [137]. Intraoperative prophylaxis can be complicated by hemodynamic instability including epidural use and the risk of residual neuromuscular blockade, therefore should be administered on a case-by-case basis.
12.4.4 Cardiac Herniation
An acute cardiac herniation is one of the rare complications after lung surgeries especially pneumonectomy or with pericardial involvement [141]. It usually manifests with pericardial closure dehiscence within 24 h postoperatively. This is associated with increased mortality by almost 50% [142]. It typically results from pressure differences in the two hemi-thoraces after chest closure. The superior vena cava syndrome and profound shock may be seen in cardiac herniation after right lung removal [143]. Herniation after left pneumonectomy may manifest arrhythmias and features suggestive of ventricular outflow tract obstruction.
A cardiac herniation is a surgical emergency. Also, the differential diagnosis like massive intrathoracic hemorrhage, tension pneumothorax, and pulmonary embolism needs to be considered with patients manifesting acute symptoms in the postoperative period. While mobilizing the patient to the operating room for thoracotomy and definitive repair, management includes securing the airway with a single-lumen tube (address lung isolation once surgical control is established), positioning the patient lateral decubitus with the surgical side up, hemodynamic support with inotropes and invasive monitors, and minimizing suction to the affected hemithorax. Intraoperative TEE can help prevent excessive compression of heart chambers by surgical repair [2]. These patients should remain intubated to recover in the intensive care unit.
13 Summary
Resectable lung cancers are associated with various regional mass effects, paraneoplastic syndromes, and neoadjuvant therapies which greatly impact anesthetic management. Anesthesia for lung cancer surgeries involves many challenges including one-lung ventilation in patients with limited pulmonary reserve, complex airway management, and critical analgesia to facilitate postoperative recovery. Preoperative assessment of the patient’s mechanical and parenchymal lung function, as well as cardiopulmonary interaction, stratifies the risk of perioperative complications. The thoracic anesthetist requires strong knowledge of bronchoscopic anatomy for effective lung isolation and surgical exposure. It is crucial to have an organized approach to managing hypoxemia during one-lung ventilation, both during thoracoscopic and open chest surgery.
References
Feinstein MB, Bach PB. Epidemiology of lung cancer. Chest Surg Clin N Am. 2000;10(4):653–61.
Slinger PC. Anesthesia for thoracic surgery. In: Miller’s anesthesia, 8th edn. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier/Saunders; 2015. 2 volumes (xxx, 3270, I–122 pages).
Slinger P, Darling G. Pre-anesthetic assessment for thoracic surgery. In: Principles and practice of anesthesia for thoracic surgery. New York: Springer; 2011. p. 732.
de Perrot M, Chernenko S, Waddell TK, Shargall Y, Pierre AF, Hutcheon M, et al. Role of lung transplantation in the treatment of bronchogenic carcinomas for patients with end-stage pulmonary disease. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(21):4351–6.
Naguib M, Flood P, McArdle JJ, Brenner HR. Advances in neurobiology of the neuromuscular junction: implications for the anesthesiologist. Anesthesiology. 2002;96(1):202–31.
Levin KH. Paraneoplastic neuromuscular syndromes. Neurol Clin. 1997;15(3):597–614.
Dierdorf SF. Carcinoid tumor and carcinoid syndrome. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2003;16(3):343–7.
Mehta AC, Rafanan AL, Bulkley R, Walsh M, DeBoer GE. Coronary spasm and cardiac arrest from carcinoid crisis during laser bronchoscopy. Chest. 1999;115(2):598–600.
Vaughan DJ, Brunner MD. Anesthesia for patients with carcinoid syndrome. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 1997;35(4):129–42.
Hartigan PM, Ng JM. Anesthetic strategies for patients undergoing extrapleural pneumonectomy. Thorac Surg Clin. 2004;14(4):575–83. xi
Donat SM. Peri-operative care in patients treated for testicular cancer. Semin Surg Oncol. 1999;17(4):282–8.
Licker MJ, Widikker I, Robert J, Frey JG, Spiliopoulos A, Ellenberger C, et al. Operative mortality and respiratory complications after lung resection for cancer: impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and time trends. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006;81(5):1830–7.
Lim E, Baldwin D, Beckles M, Duffy J, Entwisle J, Faivre-Finn C, et al. Guidelines on the radical management of patients with lung cancer. Thorax. 2010;65(Suppl 3):iii, 1–27.
Brunelli A, Kim AW, Berger KI, Addrizzo-Harris DJ. Physiologic evaluation of the patient with lung cancer being considered for resectional surgery: diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2013;143(5 Suppl):e166S–e90S.
Linden PA, Bueno R, Colson YL, Jaklitsch MT, Lukanich J, Mentzer S, et al. Lung resection in patients with preoperative FEV1 < 35% predicted. Chest. 2005;127(6):1984–90.
Bach PB, Cramer LD, Schrag D, Downey RJ, Gelfand SE, Begg CB. The influence of hospital volume on survival after resection for lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(3):181–8.
Donahoe LL, de Valence M, Atenafu EG, Hanna WC, Waddell TK, Pierre AF, et al. High risk for thoracotomy but not thoracoscopic lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2017;103(6):1730–5.
Brunelli A, Rocco G. Spirometry: predicting risk and outcome. Thorac Surg Clin. 2008;18(1):1–8.
Ferguson MK, Vigneswaran WT. Diffusing capacity predicts morbidity after lung resection in patients without obstructive lung disease. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85(4):1158–64. Discussion 64–5
Weisman IM. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in the preoperative assessment for lung resection surgery. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2001;13(2):116–25.
Brunelli A, Pompili C, Salati M, Refai M, Berardi R, Mazzanti P, et al. Preoperative maximum oxygen consumption is associated with prognosis after pulmonary resection in stage I non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014;98(1):238–42.
Licker M, Schnyder JM, Frey JG, Diaper J, Cartier V, Inan C, et al. Impact of aerobic exercise capacity and procedure-related factors in lung cancer surgery. Eur Respir J. 2011;37(5):1189–98.
Bolliger CT, Wyser C, Roser H, Soler M, Perruchoud AP. Lung scanning and exercise testing for the prediction of postoperative performance in lung resection candidates at increased risk for complications. Chest. 1995;108(2):341–8.
Brunelli A, Charloux A, Bolliger CT, Rocco G, Sculier JP, Varela G, et al. ERS/ESTS clinical guidelines on fitness for radical therapy in lung cancer patients (surgery and chemo-radiotherapy). Eur Respir J. 2009;34(1):17–41.
Lee L, Schwartzman K, Carli F, Zavorsky GS, Li C, Charlebois P, et al. The association of the distance walked in 6 min with pre-operative peak oxygen consumption and complications 1 month after colorectal resection. Anaesthesia. 2013;68(8):811–6.
Marjanski T, Wnuk D, Bosakowski D, Szmuda T, Sawicka W, Rzyman W. Patients who do not reach a distance of 500 m during the 6-min walk test have an increased risk of postoperative complications and prolonged hospital stay after lobectomy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;47(5):e213–9.
Carter R, Holiday DB, Stocks J, Grothues C, Tiep B. Predicting oxygen uptake for men and women with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(8):1158–64.
Kinasewitz GT, Welch MH. A simple method to assess postoperative risk. Chest. 2001;120(4):1057–8.
Olsen GN, Bolton JW, Weiman DS, Hornung CA. Stair climbing as an exercise test to predict the postoperative complications of lung resection. Two years’ experience. Chest. 1991;99(3):587–90.
Win T, Laroche CM, Groves AM, White C, Wells FC, Ritchie AJ, et al. Use of quantitative lung scintigraphy to predict postoperative pulmonary function in lung cancer patients undergoing lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;78(4):1215–8.
Fujii S, Kikura M, Takada T, Katoh S, Aoyama N, Sato S. A noninvasive partial carbon dioxide rebreathing technique for measurement of pulmonary capillary blood flow is also a useful oxygenation monitor during one-lung ventilation. J Clin Anesth. 2004;16(5):347–52.
Hasan FM, Malanga A, Corrao WM, Braman SS. Effect of catheter position on thermodilution cardiac output during continuous positive-pressure ventilation. Crit Care Med. 1984;12(4):387–90.
Bussieres JS, Slinger P. Correct positioning of double-lumen tubes. Can J Anaesth. 2012;59(5):431–6.
Klein U, Karzai W, Bloos F, Wohlfarth M, Gottschall R, Fritz H, et al. Role of fiberoptic bronchoscopy in conjunction with the use of double-lumen tubes for thoracic anesthesia: a prospective study. Anesthesiology. 1998;88(2):346–50.
American Society of Anesthesiologists, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Task Force on Transesophageal Echocardiography. Practice guidelines for perioperative transesophageal echocardiography. An updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Task Force on Transesophageal Echocardiography. Anesthesiology. 2010;112(5):1084–96.
Campos JH. Progress in lung separation. Thorac Surg Clin. 2005;15(1):71–83.
Eberle B, Weiler N, Vogel N, Kauczor HU, Heinrichs W. Computed tomography-based tracheobronchial image reconstruction allows selection of the individually appropriate double-lumen tube size. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1999;13(5):532–7.
Seymour AH. The relationship between the diameters of the adult cricoid ring and main tracheobronchial tree: a cadaver study to investigate the basis for double-lumen tube selection. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2003;17(3):299–301.
Brodsky JB, Lemmens HJ. Left double-lumen tubes: clinical experience with 1,170 patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2003;17(3):289–98.
Campos JH, Gomez MN. Pro: Right-sided double-lumen endotracheal tubes should be routinely used in thoracic surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2002;16(2):246–8.
Narayanaswamy M, McRae K, Slinger P, Dugas G, Kanellakos GW, Roscoe A, et al. Choosing a lung isolation device for thoracic surgery: a randomized trial of three bronchial blockers versus double-lumen tubes. Anesth Analg. 2009;108(4):1097–101.
Bussieres JS, Somma J, Del Castillo JL, Lemieux J, Conti M, Ugalde PA, et al. Bronchial blocker versus left double-lumen endotracheal tube in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a randomized-controlled trial examining time and quality of lung deflation. Can J Anaesth. 2016;63(7):818–27.
Clayton-Smith A, Bennett K, Alston RP, Adams G, Brown G, Hawthorne T, et al. A comparison of the efficacy and adverse effects of double-lumen endobronchial tubes and bronchial blockers in thoracic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2015;29(4):955–66.
Sandberg WS. Endobronchial blocker dislodgement leading to pulseless electrical activity. Anesth Analg. 2005;100(6):1728–30.
Peragallo RA, Swenson JD. Congenital tracheal bronchus: the inability to isolate the right lung with a univent bronchial blocker tube. Anesth Analg. 2000;91(2):300–1.
Soto RG, Oleszak SP. Resection of the Arndt bronchial blocker during stapler resection of the left lower lobe. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2006;20(1):131–2.
Campos JH, Hallam EA, Van Natta T, Kernstine KH. Devices for lung isolation used by anesthesiologists with limited thoracic experience: comparison of double-lumen endotracheal tube, Univent torque control blocker, and Arndt wire-guided endobronchial blocker. Anesthesiology. 2006;104(2):261–6, Discussion 5A.
Moudgil R, Michelakis ED, Archer SL. Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2005;98(1):390–403.
Eisenkraft JB. Effects of anaesthetics on the pulmonary circulation. Br J Anaesth. 1990;65(1):63–78.
Talbot NP, Balanos GM, Dorrington KL, Robbins PA. Two temporal components within the human pulmonary vascular response to approximately 2 h of isocapnic hypoxia. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2005;98(3):1125–39.
Dorrington KL, Clar C, Young JD, Jonas M, Tansley JG, Robbins PA. Time course of the human pulmonary vascular response to 8 hours of isocapnic hypoxia. Am J Physiol. 1997;273(3 Pt 2):H1126–34.
Marshall C, Lindgren L, Marshall BE. Effects of halothane, enflurane, and isoflurane on hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction in rat lungs in vitro. Anesthesiology. 1984;60(4):304–8.
Benumof JL. Isoflurane anesthesia and arterial oxygenation during one-lung ventilation. Anesthesiology. 1986;64(4):419–22.
Wang JY, Russell GN, Page RD, Jackson M, Pennefather SH. Comparison of the effects of sevoflurane and isoflurane on arterial oxygenation during one lung ventilation. Br J Anaesth. 1998;81(6):850–3.
Wang JY, Russell GN, Page RD, Oo A, Pennefather SH. A comparison of the effects of desflurane and isoflurane on arterial oxygenation during one-lung ventilation. Anaesthesia. 2000;55(2):167–73.
Reid CW, Slinger PD, Lenis S. A comparison of the effects of propofol-alfentanil versus isoflurane anesthesia on arterial oxygenation during one-lung ventilation. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1996;10(7):860–3.
Modolo NS, Modolo MP, Marton MA, Volpato E, Monteiro Arantes V, do Nascimento Junior P, et al. Intravenous versus inhalation anaesthesia for one-lung ventilation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(7):CD006313.
Lohser J, Slinger P. Lung injury after one-lung ventilation: a review of the pathophysiologic mechanisms affecting the ventilated and the collapsed lung. Anesth Analg. 2015;121(2):302–18.
Alam N, Park BJ, Wilton A, Seshan VE, Bains MS, Downey RJ, et al. Incidence and risk factors for lung injury after lung cancer resection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84(4):1085–91. Discussion 91
Force ADT, Ranieri VM, Rubenfeld GD, Thompson BT, Ferguson ND, Caldwell E, et al. Acute respiratory distress syndrome: the Berlin Definition. JAMA. 2012;307(23):2526–33.
Licker M, de Perrot M, Spiliopoulos A, Robert J, Diaper J, Chevalley C, et al. Risk factors for acute lung injury after thoracic surgery for lung cancer. Anesth Analg. 2003;97(6):1558–65.
Brassard CL, Lohser J, Donati F, Bussieres JS. Step-by-step clinical management of one-lung ventilation: continuing professional development. Can J Anaesth. 2014;61(12):1103–21.
Licker M, Diaper J, Villiger Y, Spiliopoulos A, Licker V, Robert J, et al. Impact of intraoperative lung-protective interventions in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery. Crit Care. 2009;13(2):R41.
Lohser J. Evidence-based management of one-lung ventilation. Anesthesiol Clin. 2008;26(2):241–72. v
Slinger P, Kilpatrick B. Perioperative lung protection strategies in cardiothoracic anesthesia: are they useful? Anesthesiol Clin. 2012;30(4):607–28.
Jeon K, Yoon JW, Suh GY, Kim J, Kim K, Yang M, et al. Risk factors for post-pneumonectomy acute lung injury/acute respiratory distress syndrome in primary lung cancer patients. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2009;37(1):14–9.
Tusman G, Bohm SH, Sipmann FS, Maisch S. Lung recruitment improves the efficiency of ventilation and gas exchange during one-lung ventilation anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2004;98(6):1604–9, table of contents.
Slinger P, Suissa S, Triolet W. Predicting arterial oxygenation during one-lung anaesthesia. Can J Anaesth. 1992;39(10):1030–5.
Ribas J, Jimenez MJ, Barbera JA, Roca J, Gomar C, Canalis E, et al. Gas exchange and pulmonary hemodynamics during lung resection in patients at increased risk: relationship with preoperative exercise testing. Chest. 2001;120(3):852–9.
Antognini JF, Hanowell LH. Intraoperative hypoxemia complicating sequential resection of bilateral pulmonary metastases. Anesthesiology. 1991;74(6):1137–9.
Fujiwara M, Abe K, Mashimo T. The effect of positive end-expiratory pressure and continuous positive airway pressure on the oxygenation and shunt fraction during one-lung ventilation with propofol anesthesia. J Clin Anesth. 2001;13(7):473–7.
Bailey J, Mikhail M, Haddy S, Thangathurai D. Problems with CPAP during one-lung ventilation in thoracoscopic surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1998;12(2):239.
Ku CM, Slinger P, Waddell TK. A novel method of treating hypoxemia during one-lung ventilation for thoracoscopic surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2009;23(6):850–2.
Campos JH. Effects of oxygenation during selective lobar versus total lung collapse with or without continuous positive airway pressure. Anesth Analg. 1997;85(3):583–6.
Ishikawa S, Nakazawa K, Makita K. Progressive changes in arterial oxygenation during one-lung anaesthesia are related to the response to compression of the non-dependent lung. Br J Anaesth. 2003;90(1):21–6.
Dalibon N, Moutafis M, Liu N, Law-Koune JD, Monsel S, Fischler M. Treatment of hypoxemia during one-lung ventilation using intravenous almitrine. Anesth Analg. 2004;98(3):590–4, table of contents.
Moutafis M, Dalibon N, Liu N, Kuhlman G, Fischler M. The effects of intravenous almitrine on oxygenation and hemodynamics during one-lung ventilation. Anesth Analg. 2002;94(4):830–4, table of contents.
Silva-Costa-Gomes T, Gallart L, Valles J, Trillo L, Minguella J, Puig MM. Low- vs high-dose almitrine combined with nitric oxide to prevent hypoxia during open-chest one-lung ventilation. Br J Anaesth. 2005;95(3):410–6.
Doering EB, Hanson CW 3rd, Reily DJ, Marshall C, Marshall BE. Improvement in oxygenation by phenylephrine and nitric oxide in patients with adult respiratory distress syndrome. Anesthesiology. 1997;87(1):18–25.
Chau EH, Slinger P. Perioperative fluid management for pulmonary resection surgery and esophagectomy. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2014;18(1):36–44.
Marret E, Miled F, Bazelly B, El Metaoua S, de Montblanc J, Quesnel C, et al. Risk and protective factors for major complications after pneumonectomy for lung cancer. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2010;10(6):936–9.
Searl CP, Perrino A. Fluid management in thoracic surgery. Anesthesiol Clin. 2012;30(4):641–55.
Slinger P, Robinson R, Shennib H, Benumof JL, Eisenkraft JB. Case 6—1992. Alternative technique for laser resection of a carinal obstruction. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 1992;6(6):749–55.
Herth F, Becker HD, LoCicero J 3rd, Thurer R, Ernst A. Successful bronchoscopic placement of tracheobronchial stents without fluoroscopy. Chest. 2001;119(6):1910–2.
Lohser J, Donington JS, Mitchell JD, Brodsky JB, Raman J, Slinger P. Case 5—2005: anesthetic management of major hemorrhage during mediastinoscopy. [clin conf]. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2005;19(5):678–83.
Wahidi MM, Herth F, Yasufuku K, Shepherd RW, Yarmus L, Chawla M, et al. Technical aspects of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report. Chest. 2016;149(3):816–35.
Rintoul RC, Skwarski KM, Murchison JT, Wallace WA, Walker WS, Penman ID. Endobronchial and endoscopic ultrasound-guided real-time fine-needle aspiration for mediastinal staging. Eur Respir J. 2005;25(3):416–21.
Kaseda S, Aoki T, Hangai N, Shimizu K. Better pulmonary function and prognosis with video-assisted thoracic surgery than with thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;70(5):1644–6.
Yim AP, Wan S, Lee TW, Arifi AA. VATS lobectomy reduces cytokine responses compared with conventional surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2000;70(1):243–7.
Gaudet MA, D’Amico TA. Thoracoscopic lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2016;25(3):503–13.
Scott WJ, Allen MS, Darling G, Meyers B, Decker PA, Putnam JB, et al. Video-assisted thoracic surgery versus open lobectomy for lung cancer: a secondary analysis of data from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z0030 randomized clinical trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;139(4):976–81. Discussion 81–3
D’Amico TA. Thoracoscopic lobectomy: evolving and improving. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;132(3):464–5.
Cerfolio RJ, Bryant AS, Sheils TM, Bass CS, Bartolucci AA. Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery using single-lumen endotracheal tube anesthesia. Chest. 2004;126(1):281–5.
Pompeo E, Mineo TC. Awake operative videothoracoscopic pulmonary resections. Thorac Surg Clin. 2008;18(3):311–20.
Steenwyk B, Lyerly R 3rd. Advancements in robotic-assisted thoracic surgery. Anesthesiol Clin. 2012;30(4):699–708.
Bagan P, Berna P, Pereira JC, Le Pimpec Barthes F, Foucault C, Dujon A, et al. Sleeve lobectomy versus pneumonectomy: tumor characteristics and comparative analysis of feasibility and results. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;80(6):2046–50.
D’Andrilli A, Venuta F, Maurizi G, Rendina EA. Bronchial and arterial sleeve resection after induction therapy for lung cancer. Thorac Surg Clin. 2014;24(4):411–21.
Pricopi C, Mordant P, Rivera C, Arame A, Foucault C, Dujon A, et al. Postoperative morbidity and mortality after pneumonectomy: a 30-year experience of 2064 consecutive patients. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2015;20(3):316–21.
Ramnath N, Demmy TL, Antun A, Natarajan N, Nwogu CE, Loewen GM, et al. Pneumonectomy for bronchogenic carcinoma: analysis of factors predicting survival. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;83(5):1831–6.
Powell ES, Pearce AC, Cook D, Davies P, Bishay E, Bowler GM, et al. UK pneumonectomy outcome study (UKPOS): a prospective observational study of pneumonectomy outcome. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2009;4:41.
Foroulis CN, Kotoulas CS, Kakouros S, Evangelatos G, Chassapis C, Konstantinou M, et al. Study on the late effect of pneumonectomy on right heart pressures using Doppler echocardiography. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004;26(3):508–14.
Wolf AS, Flores RM. Extrapleural pneumonectomy for pleural malignancies. Thorac Surg Clin. 2014;24(4):471–5.
McGlade DP, Slinger PD. The elective combined use of a double lumen tube and endobronchial blocker to provide selective lobar isolation for lung resection following contralateral lobectomy. Anesthesiology. 2003;99(4):1021–2.
Scawn ND, Pennefather SH, Soorae A, Wang JY, Russell GN. Ipsilateral shoulder pain after thoracotomy with epidural analgesia: the influence of phrenic nerve infiltration with lidocaine. Anesth Analg. 2001;93(2):260–4, 1st contents page.
Savage C, McQuitty C, Wang D, Zwischenberger JB. Postthoracotomy pain management. Chest Surg Clin N Am. 2002;12(2):251–63.
Steinthorsdottir KJ, Wildgaard L, Hansen HJ, Petersen RH, Wildgaard K. Regional analgesia for video-assisted thoracic surgery: a systematic review. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014;45(6):959–66.
Dutta V, Kumar B, Jayant A, Mishra AK. Effect of continuous paravertebral dexmedetomidine administration on intraoperative anesthetic drug requirement and post-thoracotomy pain syndrome after thoracotomy: a randomized controlled trial. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2017;31(1):159–65.
Kavanagh BP, Katz J, Sandler AN. Pain control after thoracic surgery. A review of current techniques. Anesthesiology. 1994;81(3):737–59.
Mac TB, Girard F, Chouinard P, Boudreault D, Lafontaine ER, Ruel M, et al. Acetaminophen decreases early post-thoracotomy ipsilateral shoulder pain in patients with thoracic epidural analgesia: a double-blind placebo-controlled study. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2005;19(4):475–8.
Moyse DW, Kaye AD, Diaz JH, Qadri MY, Lindsay D, Pyati S. Perioperative ketamine administration for thoracotomy pain. Pain Physician. 2017;20(3):173–84.
Hotta K, Endo T, Taira K, Sata N, Inoue S, Takeuchi M, et al. Comparison of the analgesic effects of continuous extrapleural block and continuous epidural block after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2011;25(6):1009–13.
Reddi D. Preventing chronic postoperative pain. Anaesthesia. 2016;71(Suppl 1):64–71.
Chin KJ, Karmakar MK, Peng P. Ultrasonography of the adult thoracic and lumbar spine for central neuraxial blockade. Anesthesiology. 2011;114(6):1459–85.
Hansdottir V, Woestenborghs R, Nordberg G. The pharmacokinetics of continuous epidural sufentanil and bupivacaine infusion after thoracotomy. Anesth Analg. 1996;83(2):401–6.
Gruber EM, Tschernko EM, Kritzinger M, Deviatko E, Wisser W, Zurakowski D, et al. The effects of thoracic epidural analgesia with bupivacaine 0.25% on ventilatory mechanics in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Anesth Analg. 2001;92(4):1015–9.
Gottschalk A, Cohen SP, Yang S, Ochroch EA. Preventing and treating pain after thoracic surgery. Anesthesiology. 2006;104(3):594–600.
Karmakar MK. Thoracic paravertebral block. Anesthesiology. 2001;95(3):771–80.
Krediet AC, Moayeri N, van Geffen GJ, Bruhn J, Renes S, Bigeleisen PE, et al. Different approaches to ultrasound-guided thoracic paravertebral block: an illustrated review. Anesthesiology. 2015;123(2):459–74.
Luyet C, Eichenberger U, Greif R, Vogt A, Szucs Farkas Z, Moriggl B. Ultrasound-guided paravertebral puncture and placement of catheters in human cadavers: an imaging study. Br J Anaesth. 2009;102(4):534–9.
Davies RG, Myles PS, Graham JM. A comparison of the analgesic efficacy and side-effects of paravertebral vs epidural blockade for thoracotomy—a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Br J Anaesth. 2006;96(4):418–26.
Powell ES, Cook D, Pearce AC, Davies P, Bowler GM, Naidu B, et al. A prospective, multicentre, observational cohort study of analgesia and outcome after pneumonectomy. Br J Anaesth. 2011;106(3):364–70.
Casati A, Alessandrini P, Nuzzi M, Tosi M, Iotti E, Ampollini L, et al. A prospective, randomized, blinded comparison between continuous thoracic paravertebral and epidural infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine after lung resection surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2006;23(12):999–1004.
Yeung JH, Gates S, Naidu BV, Wilson MJ, Gao Smith F. Paravertebral block versus thoracic epidural for patients undergoing thoracotomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;(2):CD009121.
Joshi GP, Bonnet F, Shah R, Wilkinson RC, Camu F, Fischer B, et al. A systematic review of randomized trials evaluating regional techniques for postthoracotomy analgesia. Anesth Analg. 2008;107(3):1026–40.
Hill SE, Keller RA, Stafford-Smith M, Grichnik K, White WD, D’Amico TA, et al. Efficacy of single-dose, multilevel paravertebral nerve blockade for analgesia after thoracoscopic procedures. Anesthesiology. 2006;104(5):1047–53.
Forero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The erector spinae plane block: a novel analgesic technique in thoracic neuropathic pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41(5):621–7.
Forero M, Rajarathinam M, Adhikary S, Chin KJ. Erector spinae plane (ESP) block in the management of post thoracotomy pain syndrome: a case series. Scand J Pain. 2017;17:325–9.
Barak M, Iaroshevski D, Poppa E, Ben-Nun A, Katz Y. Low-volume interscalene brachial plexus block for post-thoracotomy shoulder pain. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007;21(4):554–7.
Schmid RL, Sandler AN, Katz J. Use and efficacy of low-dose ketamine in the management of acute postoperative pain: a review of current techniques and outcomes. Pain. 1999;82(2):111–25.
Chan DT, Sihoe AD, Chan S, Tsang DS, Fang B, Lee TW, et al. Surgical treatment for empyema thoracis: is video-assisted thoracic surgery “better” than thoracotomy? Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84(1):225–31.
Fuso L, Varone F, Nachira D, Leli I, Salimbene I, Congedo MT, et al. Incidence and management of post-lobectomy and pneumonectomy bronchopleural fistula. Lung. 2016;194(2):299–305.
Wright CD, Wain JC, Mathisen DJ, Grillo HC. Postpneumonectomy bronchopleural fistula after sutured bronchial closure: incidence, risk factors, and management. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;112(5):1367–71.
Mulot A, Sepulveda S, Haberer JP, Alifano M. Diagnosis of postpneumonectomy bronchopleural fistula using inhalation of oxygen or nitrous oxide. Anesth Analg. 2002;95(4):1122–3.
Travaline JM, RJ MK Jr, De Giacomo T, Venuta F, Hazelrigg SR, Boomer M, et al. Treatment of persistent pulmonary air leaks using endobronchial valves. Chest. 2009;136(2):355–60.
Williams A, Kay J. Thoracic epidural anesthesia for thoracoscopy, rib resection, and thoracotomy in a patient with a bronchopleural fistula postpneumonectomy. Anesthesiology. 2000;92(5):1482–4.
Tietjen CS, Simon BA, Helfaer MA. Permissive hypercapnia with high-frequency oscillatory ventilation and one-lung isolation for intraoperative management of lung resection in a patient with multiple bronchopleural fistulae. J Clin Anesth. 1997;9(1):69–73.
Zhao BC, Huang TY, Deng QW, Liu WF, Liu J, Deng WT, et al. Prophylaxis against atrial fibrillation after general thoracic surgery: trial sequential analysis and network meta-analysis. Chest. 2017;151(1):149–59.
Dixit S. Atrial fibrillation after major thoracic surgery: new insights into underlying mechanisms. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54(22):2049–51.
Gialdini G, Nearing K, Bhave PD, Bonuccelli U, Iadecola C, Healey JS, et al. Perioperative atrial fibrillation and the long-term risk of ischemic stroke. JAMA. 2014;312(6):616–22.
Roselli EE, Murthy SC, Rice TW, Houghtaling PL, Pierce CD, Karchmer DP, et al. Atrial fibrillation complicating lung cancer resection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;130(2):438–44.
Sugarbaker DJ, Jaklitsch MT, Bueno R, Richards W, Lukanich J, Mentzer SJ, et al. Prevention, early detection, and management of complications after 328 consecutive extrapleural pneumonectomies. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;128(1):138–46.
Baisi A, Cioffi U, Nosotti M, De Simone M, Rosso L, Santambrogio L. Intrapericardial left pneumonectomy after induction chemotherapy: the risk of cardiac herniation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;123(6):1206–7.
Mehanna MJ, Israel GM, Katigbak M, Rubinowitz AN. Cardiac herniation after right pneumonectomy: case report and review of the literature. J Thorac Imaging. 2007;22(3):280–2.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
MacLellan, B., Slinger, P. (2021). Anesthesia for Lung Cancers. In: Garg, R., Bhatnagar, S. (eds) Textbook of Onco-Anesthesiology. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0006-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0006-7_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-16-0005-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-16-0006-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)