Abstract
Pituitary tumours are rare neoplasm in children and adolescents. Although craniopharyngioma is largely the most common pituitary tumour (80-90% of all pituitary fossa lesions in children) the incidence is around 1 case per million people/year, being near 40% of all cases diagnosed in children. Pituitary adenomas are the second most frequent pituitary tumour in children. They show many differences from their adult counterparts as there is very low rate of non functioning tumours, corticotropinomas are the most frequent functioning tumours in young children and many of other functioning tumours are macroadenomas. Many other lesions have been described in pituitary fossa, as Rathke cleft cysts, epidermoid and dermoid cysts, germinomas, etc. They have very low incidence and prevalence in children and may be described in small series and case reports. Pituitary tumours are challenging from many points of view and after diagnosis may be referred to multidisciplinary teams as patients need to be followed by pediatricians, endocrinologists, ophthalmologists, neurosurgeons, radiotherapists but also neurologists, physiatrist, general practiotioner, nutritionists and psychologists. Clinicians may be aware of these group of pituitary tumours in children to recognize signs and symptoms and prevent delayed diagnosis. This chapter focuses on the most common tumours in pituitary gland and pituitary fossa, mainly craniopharyngiomas and pituitary adenomas, and summarizes other less frequent diseases of this region.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
1 Pituitary Gland: Development, Anatomy and Function
Embriological basis of pituitary gland development may help in pituitary tumours understanding. Pituitary gland is a master neuroendocrine organ located at midline within the sella turcica recess of the sphenoid bone [1, 2]. It has an essential role in maintenance of homeostasis and reproductive function [3], regulating production and secretion of peptid hormones to develope and functioning of many organs, including thyroid, adrenal glands, gonads, mammary gland and liver [2].
The pituitary gland forms around the middle of the fourth embryonic week from an invagination of the oral ectoderm (stomodeum) to the rudimentary primordium (Rathke’s pouch) [3]. Neurulation, neural plate development from ectoderm, occur at 3 weeks of gestation [4]. The anterior part of neural plate will grow to develope the forebrain, optic nerves, hypothalamus, anterior and posterior pituitary lobe [1]. To understand pituitary gland development the murine model has been used because is similar to other vertebrates and humans [5,6,7]. In the murine model pituitary organogenesis begins around E8.5 (embrionic day 8.5) with the appearance of Rathke’s pouch, an invagination of the anterior pituitary placode from oral ectoderm. The dorsal portion of the pouch contacts the midline of the ventral diencephalon, evagination of which (around E10) acts as the main organizer for its patterning and differentiation of its cells [8]. So the hypothalamus (part of diencephalon derived from neural ectoderm) influences and regulate hypophysis gland development (derived from ectoderm) [7]. After 24 h of primordium Rathke’s pouch development infundibulum (ventral diencephalon) invaginate to contact Rathke’s pouch at the time that it severed from oral ectoderm achieving a fully developed definitive pouch [1].
The final pituitary gland is composed of three lobes: the endocrine hormone-producing anterior and intermediate lobes originated from the oral ectoderm (Rathke’s Pouch) and the posterior lobe (neurohypophysis) developed from the overlying neural ectoderm as does pituitary stalk [1].
The adenohypophysis (pituitary anterior lobe) produces six different hormones: corticotropin or adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) by corticotrophs cells, growth hormone (GH) by somatotrophs cells, thyroid-stimulating hormone or thyrotropin (TSH) by thyrotrophs cells, luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) by gonadotrophs and prolactin (PRL) by lactotrophs cells [1, 2]. The production and secretion of all six hormones is controlled by factors synthesized and released from the axonal terminals of hypothalamic neurons to the hypophyseal portal system [9, 10] so the hypothalamus regulates posterior lobe but also anterior. Hypothalamus secretes: corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) that controls ACTH, GHRH that regulate GH secretion, thyrotropin-RH (TRH) for TSH, and gonadotropin-RH (GnRH) for LH and FSH; dopamine inhibits PRL secretion. All of them are trophic factors, releasing hormones (RH), that regulate the function of the anterior pituitary through modulation of cell proliferation, hormone synthesis, and secretion [9].
The neurohypophysis (pituitary posterior lobe) contains axonal terminals from hypothalamic and secretes oxytocin and vasopressin. These hormones are synthesized by neurons from hypothalamus and transported to the axonal terminis. Neurons from posterior lobe are surrounded by pituitocytes (astroglia) [9].
2 Pituitary and Sellar Tumours
As described previously, pituitary tumours are rare neoplasms in children. Incidence and prevalence of all CNS tumours in children in the United States showed 4.9 new cases per 100.000/year and 35.4 cases per 100.000, respectively [11]. Some series in literature estimate that up to 15% of all intracranial tumours in children are craniopharyngiomas [9] but, in general, it seems to be much less frequent neoplasm accounting for 1.2–4% of all intracranial tumours in children [12], so we can estimate an incidence around 0.06–0.2 cases per 100.000 patient/year and prevalence of 0.4 to 1.4 cases per 100.000 children. Pituitary adenomas are the second most common tumours in pituitary fossa although less frequent than craniopharyngioma.
2.1 Craniopharyngiomas
The first description of a craniopharyngioma was in 1857 by Zenker but the term craniopharyngioma was introduced in 1932 by Cushing [13]. They are the most frequent of all pituitary fossa tumours in children comprising 80–90% [9].
Incidence of craniopharyngiomas has bimodal distribution. First peak is between 5 and 14 years old and the second in the fift decade of life [14, 15].
Craniopharyngiomas are benign tumours that are probably the result of metaplastic changes in vestigial epithelial cell rests along the tract of the involuted hypophyseal–pharyngeal duct or Rathke’s pouch that forms the adenohypophysis and glandular portion of the pituitary stalk (derived from an stomodeum diverticulum) [16].
There are two distinct histological patterns: adamantinomatous (children and adults) and squamous papilar (almost in adults). There are two theories to explain craniopharyngiomas development related to embriology of pituitary gland as described before. The embryogenetic theory : adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas arise from epithelial remnants of the craniopharyngeal duct or Rathke’s pouch (derived from parts of the stomadeum that form tooth primordial). The metaplastic theory : squamous papillary tumors arise from metaplasia of squamous epithelial cell rests (remnants of that portion of the stomodeum that contributed to the development of the buccal mucosa) [16,17,18,19].
Nowadays, genetic and epigenetic studies showed different mutation and pathway signaling between both craniopahryngioma subtypes, so there might be new therapeutic strategies in the next future to treat or control tumor growth and progression [15].
2.1.1 Clinical Presentation
Clinical presentation in children is related to mass effect or endocrine disturbances. Initial symptoms of craniopharyngioma are frequently unspecific, and the diagnosis can be made relatively late. The most frequent symptoms before the diagnosis in children are headache (68%), followed by visual impairment (55%), growth failure (36%), nausea (34%), neurologic deficits (23%), polydipsia/polyuria (19%) and weight gain (16%) [12, 20, 21]. The period from initial symptoms to the diagnosis does not correlate with tumor size, hypothalamic involvement, functional capacity or survival [22]. It is important to investigate children that show weight gain and growth retardation because they may be early signs of craniopharyngiomas in children. Acute presentation with signs and symptoms of raised ICP or acute vision loss secondary to obstructive hydrocephalus are associated with bad prognosis with lower 10-year overall survival [22].
2.1.2 Diagnosis
Imaging: craniopharyngioma can be located in the sella, and/or partially or entirely suprasellar. Craniopharyngioma classic CT scan image in a child is an enhancing sellar/suprasellar mass that is calcified (90% of craniopharyngiomas calcify in children) and cystic. When two out of these three features are present, craniopharyngioma is the most likely diagnosis [23, 24]. Usually the solid focus is in the sella and cystic components arising above it [24]. On MRI usually demonstrates T1 high intensity, reflecting the protein or cholesterol content of the “motor oil-like” fluid found in the tumor cysts [25]. Other causes of T1 hyperintensity in craniopharyngiomas have been described—fat, hemorrhage, or even mild calcification [26]. On T2-weighted sequences, including Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery (FLAIR), the solid portion is again usually heterogeneous, whereas the cysts are invariably hyperintense. The use of contrast show almost invariable contrast enhancement of the solid portion and the peripheral rim of the cystic portion on both CT and MR (Fig. 21.1).
The most common differential diagnosis of craniopharyngioma are pituitary adenoma, hypothalamic or optic pathway glioma, Rathke’s pouch cyst and Epidermoid tumor. Pituitary adenomas are noncalcified lesions, have a tendency to expand into the sella and have less superior extension. If cystic component is present it usually has low intensity signal on T1 images [27]. Hypothalamic or optic pathway gliomas rarely have a sellar component (only large lesions), rarely calcify, are usually isointense on T1 and usually lack a cystic component [24]. Large Rathke’s cleft cysts typically do not contain a solid component, do not enhance, and are not calcified. With small lesions it may be difficult to differentiate [28]. Epidermoid tumors are rare in the suprasellar region and may be identified by restricted diffusion as they have high signal. Peripheral rim enhancement is less common in epidermoids [29].
Hormonal and hypothalamic assessment: endocrine deficits might be present in 52%–87% of children at the time of presentation as the result of disturbances to the hypothalamic-pituitary axes. They affect growth hormone secretion (75%), gonadotropins (40%), adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) (25%), and thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) (25%) [30]. 17%–27% have been reported to have diabetes insipidus neurohormonalis [31,32,33]. So all hypothalamus-pituitary axis, urine output and water intake must be tested at the time of diagnosis.
Symptoms of hypothalamic dysfunction have been found in 35% of craniopharyngioma patients at diagnosis. They are obesity, behavioral changes, disturbed circadian rhythm and sleep irregularities, daytime sleepiness, and imbalances in regulation of body temperature , thirst, heart rate and/or blood pressure [33]. Rapid weight gain and severe obesity are serious neuroendocrine complications due to hypothalamic involvement and difficult to control. 12%–19% of patients reported to be obese at presentation [31, 32, 34, 35] and often occur years before diagnosis [36].
Ophtalmological examination: Craniopharyngiomas commonly induce visual impairment in children so ophthalmological examination and referral might be done at diagnosis [37, 38]. Almost 50% of children may have visual impairment at diagnosis: decreased visual acuity (41.3%), visual field loss (38.3%), papilledema (25.8%) and optic nerve atrophy (44.8%). Abnormalities in orthoptic examination such strabismus, diplopia and cranial nerve deficits were seen in 12.5% of cases [37].
2.1.3 Treatment
Treatment of craniopharyngiomas in children is under continuous debate because the optimal treatment strategy for craniopharyngioma is controversial [39, 40]. Although craniopharyngiomas are benign lesions and, historically, gross total resection has been the preferred treatment approach, tumor’s proximity, encasement and invasion to vital structures such as hypothalamus, frontal lobe, ventricles, cranial nerves, and circle of Willis makes complete tumour resection unfeasible and unsafe in many cases and may lead to high rates of hypothalamic-pituitary and/or optic impairment [42,43,44,45,45].
Perioperative fatal complications are reported in up to 3% of craniopharyngioma surgery [52]. The rate of neuroendocrine hypothalamic dysfunction increases seriously following radical surgical treatment, up to 65%–80% in some series [30, 33, 34]. The degree of obesity of affected craniopharyngioma patients is positively correlated with the degree of hypothalamic damage [54,55,55] and rapid weight gain typically occurs during the first 6–12 months after treatment [35, 55, 56]. The prevalence of severe obesity is higher in comparison with pretreatment status, reaching up to 55% [30]. Obesity and eating disorders result in increased risks of metabolic syndrome [57] and cardiovascular disease [55], including sudden death events [58], multisystem morbidity and death [59].
The rate of post-surgical pituitary hormone deficiencies increases due to the tumor’s proximity or even involvement of hypothalamic-pituitary axis [30, 32, 33, 36, 61,62,63,64,64]. Transient post-surgical diabetes insipidus occurs in up to 80%–100% of all cases [30, 34, 60] and the rate of permanent post-surgical diabetes insipidus ranges between 40% and 93% [30, 32,33,34,35, 60, 61, 65]. Growth hormone deficiency following treatment is found in about 70%–92% of patients [30, 36, 53, 66, 67].
Last twenty years many groups reviewed their results retrospectively to design new strategies in order to reduce mortality and morbidity secondary to surgical treatment [13, 40, 47,48,49,50,51,51].
Some classifications emerged based on preoperative clinical and imaging but focused in craniopharyngioma relationship/invasion of hypothalamus and sparing during surgical procedures [13, 21, 49, 69,70,71,71]. Nowadays it is accepted that craniopharyngioma with no hipothalamus involvement and “safety” neurovascular dissection might be treated by surgery with the goal of complete removal. When hypothalamus sparing is not possible more conservative surgical management is the rule with association of radiotherapy for tumour remnant. This new approach for craniopharyngioma treatment has shown good long-term disease control and survival with much less morbidity and mortality mainly related to hypothalamus sparing [13, 40, 41, 49,50,51,51, 54,55,56,56, 62, 63].
Surgical technique may be by craniotomy (pterional transsylvian fissure, interhemispheric transcallosal, midline subfrontal, supraorbitary subfrontal), by endoscopic transnasal transsphenoidal approach or expanded endonasal approach but also by transventricular endoscopic approach. There are also some radiotherapy approaches to craniopharyngioma adjuvant treatment. Detailed description of surgical technique and radiotherapy options are beyond the scope of this chapter.
Overall survival rates reflect the benign origin of craniopharyngiomas but also the complexity and consequences of treatment options, mainly when hypothalamus is affected. Overall survival described in children series show: from 83% to 96% at 5 years, 65%–100% at 10 years and averaging 62% at 20 years. It is not only survival but also quality of life affected by craniopharyngiomas when there is hypothalamus involvement so treatment recommended strategy, in this cases, is limited hypothalamus-sparing surgery followed by radiotherapy [46].
2.2 Pituitary Adenomas
Pituitary adenomas are very rare in children. Data from autopsy studies show that pituitary adenomas were present in 17–25% in general population and data from radiological imaging studies show similar incidence, up to 20% of people [73,74,74]. Only 3.5 to 8.5% of pituitary adenomas are diagnosed in people under 20 years of age accounting for 3% of all intracranial tumours in children [76,77,78,78]. However many adenomas presenting in early adult life probably originated in childhood [79].
Pituitary adenomas in children, in comparison to adenomas in adults, are more frequently functioning (80–97%). Adrenocorticotropin (ACTH)-secreting adenomas (Cushing disease) are the most common in early childhood, followed by prolactin (PRL)- prolactinoma- and growth hormone (GH)- secreting adenomas [80]. Prolactinomas predominate in older children and adolescents [3, 81, 82]. Except for corticotroph adenomas, the majority of pituitary adenomas are macroadenomas (diameter > 1 cm) and are frequently invasive.
Although the majority of these tumors are sporadic they can be part of a genetic condition predisposing to pituitary and other tumors. Even sporadic tumors have genetic abnormalities: most pituitary tumors are monoclonal lesions and modifications in expression of various oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes. In recent years many genetic defects have been identified, including genes involved in cell signaling or cell growth and proliferation [79, 81, 84,85,86,87,87]. Other factors and genetic events seem to be implicated in pituitary cell clonal expansion, and oncogene activation is necessary to propagate tumor growth [3, 83, 85]. Familial cases account for 5% of pituitary adenomas [79, 81, 86, 87]. Some genetic syndromes have been associated with pituitary adenomas: MEN-1, McCune- Albright, Carney complex and familial isolated pituitary adenomas (FIPA) [88].
Clinical and laboratory diagnosis depend on tumour secreting hormone (adenoma subtype). Pituitary MR imaging is the modality of choice for detecting pituitary adenomas. Main sequences are T1 weighted spin-echo MRI of the pituitary before and after administration of gadolinium (Gd). Adenohypophysis (anterior pituitary gland) is normally iso-intense with the rest of the brain. Adenomas appear as hypoenhancing lesions because normal pituitary issue enhance faster than adenoma (Fig. 21.2). Deviation of the pituitary stalk away from the side of the tumor and an asymmetrical increase in the vertical height of the gland are less specific signs for adenoma diagnosis [89]. Dynamic MR techniques rely on rapidly repeated scans, which capture the wash-in and wash-out of contrast to demonstrate a time-dependent pattern of early gland enhancement, followed by delayed adenoma enhancement, optimizing visualization of the lesion [88].
Prolactinoma (Prolactin-secreting adenomas): It arises from acidophilic cells of adenohypophysis. These cells are derived from the same embryonic lineage as the somatotropes and thyrotropes so tumours might secrete also GH and, rarely, TSH [3, 89]. Prolactinomas are the most common adenoma in children accounting for 48%–52% of tumors in general but is much more prevalent in second decade. In fact, ACTH-releasing tumors (Cushing disease) are much more common in the first decade than prolactinomas (71% vs 16%) [90]. Prolactinomas become significantly more frequent than corticotropinomas in late childhood, adolescence and adulthood [3]. Girls are more affected than boys (1.9:1 to 4.5:1, depending on age) [79].
Clinical presentation in prepubertal children is a combination of headache, visual disturbance, and growth failure. Due to suppression of gonadotropin secretion by hiperprolactinemia or local compression/destruction of pituitary gland pubertal females frequently present with symptoms of pubertal arrest, hypogonadism and, sometimes, galactorrhea. Clinicians may ask but also express the breast to rule out galactorrhea because teenagers may not spontaneously talk about this symptom and it may not occur spontaneously. In males macroadenoma are more frequent at presentation so may present with headaches and/or visual impairment. Presentation may be also pubertal arrest or growth failure but is less frequent maybe due to the fact that gonadotropin release is sensitive to the effects of hyperprolactinemia, enabling earlier detection of the tumor in females [89, 92,93,93].
Basal prolactin levels has a high diagnostic value and correlates with the size of the tumour [80, 94, 95] but, due to pulsatile secretion, at least two determinations on different days and 2–3 samples separated by 20 min should be obtained [96, 97]. It is important to rule out physiologic (nipple stimulation, chest wall lesions, physical or emotional stress), iatrogenic (medication as phenothiazines, metoclopramide, centrally acting antihypertensive) and pathologic causes (tumors and infiltrative disease of the pituitary, infundibulum, hypothalamus) of secondary hyperprolactinaemia [79, 89]. Supranormal PRL levels below 100 ng/mL may be attributable to the so-called “stalk effect”, above 100 ng/mL, prolactinoma is relatively assured and certain above 200 ng/mL—although results below these thresholds do not exclude the possibility of a true secreting prolactinoma [88, 97, 98].
Management of prolactinoma is mostly medical with dopamine agonists in order to reduce prolactin levels and reduce tumor volume, unless there is an acute threat to vision, hydrocephalus, cerebrospinal fluid leak or other surgical emergency [79, 89]. D2 agonists can achieve control of PRL in 80–90% of patients in the majority of cases in the first 6 months of therapy [97, 99]. There are mainly two options of medication, cabergoline (0.5–3.5 mg/week) or bromocriptine (2.5–15 mg/day). In the first year of treatment, up to 80% microadenomas and 25% of macroadenomas my show tumour volume reduction. Medical treatment must be continued at least two years after normal prolatin values and tumor desappearance on MR.
If hyperprolactinaemia persists after 3 months of maximal dose treatment and tumour reduction is <50% can be concluded tumour resistance to medical treatment and pituitary surgery should be considered. Radiotherapy may be an option after medical and surgical treatment failure [96, 97].
Corticotropinomas (ACTH-secreting adenomas, Cushing disease): adenomas causing Cushing’s disease are the most common pituitary adenomas in prepubescent children [3] accounting for 54.8% of adenomas from age 0 to 11 years, and 29.4% from 12 to 17 years [80]. Beyond the first 5 years of life, ACTH-secreting adenomas account for 80–90% of children who develop Cushing’s syndrome [89]. Male predominance is observed in prepubertal subjects [101, 102] accounting for 63% of cases [103]. Corticotropinomas are significantly smaller than other types of pituitary tumors (usually 3 mm or less) and rarely invade the cavernous sinus or grow into the subarachnoid space [3]. There are also case reports of tumors that originate in the posterior lobe [101].
The classic presentation is one of rapid weight gain with striae, hypertension, headaches, growth failure, pubertal failure or arrest, delayed pubertal development and amenorrhea despite often significant virilization and hirsutism and premature pubarche in prepubertal children [3, 89]. Insulin resistance is common, although frank diabetes occurs infrequently [89]. Features of paediatric Cushing disease show some differences compared with adult patients [79] as children and younger adolescents do not typically report problems with sleep disruption, muscle weakness, or problems with memory or cognition [3]. Instead of depression, memory problems, and sleep disturbances, children with Cushing’s syndrome frequently tend to be obsessive and are high performers at school [89].
The diagnosis of an ACTH-secreting adenoma needs the demonstration of ACTH-dependent hypercortisolaemia of pituitary origin [79]. Although microadenoma is the cause of most Cushing syndrome differential diagnosis must be done with primary adrenal tumors (more frequently seen in first 3 years of life), ectopic ACTH production (bronchial or thymic carcinoids), and, very rarely, ectopic CRH-producing tumors [89]. First step in diagnosis is to confirm Cushing’s syndrome with several 24-h urine free cortisol (UFC) measurements and correct values for body surface area and normal range of each laboratory. Failure of the serum cortisol to suppress to less than 3 mg/dL the morning after receiving low dose of dexamethasone at midnight is another important data [89].
To establish that the Cushing’s syndrome is due to an ACTH-secreting pituitary adenoma more tests are needed: stimulation of ACTH and cortisol following injection of ovine-CRH (increase after injection) and suppression of cortisol by more than 50% after high dose of dexamethasone given at midnight. The latter test has a sensitivity that is 85% and able to be done as an outpatient [89].
If laboratorial tests suggest corticotropinoma and the pituitary MRI shows adenoma the diagnosis is already done. If MRI is negative, then ovine-CRH-stimulated bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling can be used to confirm that the ACTH is coming from the pituitary gland and can also assist in lateralizing the tumor with approximately 75% accuracy. The sensitivity of this test at confirming pituitary ACTH dependence is 97% [89] (Fig. 21.3).
Cushing disease treatment in childhood is always surgical mainly by transsphenoidal adenomectomy [3]. The cure rate is significantly greater in those patients who have noninvasive microadenomas and is successful in over 90% of the cases, with a recurrence rate of less than 10% [3, 89]. If the tumor is surgically unresectable, or after a second recurrence, fractionated radiation or gamma-knife therapy will produce normalization of cortisol in the majority of patients, although delayed plurihormonal hormone deficiency is expected [3, 89, 104, 105]. Cure rate of radiotherapy is approximately 70–80% of children [106]. Bilateral adrenalectomy may be considered for inoperable or recurrent cases; however it is associated with a significant risk of development of Nelson’s syndrome [3, 107].
Somatotropinomas (GH-secreting adenomas, gigantism/acromegaly): Somatotroph GH-secreting adenomas account for 5–15% of pediatric pituitary tumors with a higher prevalence in males (59%) and median ages at symptom onset of 9 years and at diagnosis of 14 years [79, 108]. Approximately 90% of cases are macroadenomas, 30–60% being invasive [3]. Excess GH production in children may result from an adenoma or secondary to somatotroph hyperplasia, which occurs by stimulation of somatotroph in certain genetic conditions such as McCune-Albright syndrome, MEN-1 or Carney complex. Almost very rare, another cause of GH excess can be hypothalamic or ectopic tumors that secrete GHRH or by dysregulation of GHRH signaling that may occur as a result of a local mass effect [3, 89].
Somatotrophs are believed to have the same ancestral embriologic lineage as the lactotrophs and thyrotrophs so may stain for and secrete any or all of these hormones but it does not imply that the tumor secretes this hormone in clinically significant amounts [3, 89].
Clinical presentation varies depending on whether the epiphyseal growth plate is open or not [3, 79, 88, 89]. Before epiphyseal closure or fusion, acceleration of growth velocity with prominent height deviation above 2SDs may be the rule, a condition also known as “gigantism”. As epiphyseal fusion approaches clinical symptoms become similar to those in adults (acromegaly) such as coarse facial features, broadened nose, large hands and feet, obesity, organomegaly, sweating, nausea and glucose intolerance [3, 79, 89]. Unlike adults, there have been no reports of a significant increase in colonic polyposis or malignancy or thyroid nodules [89]. Since somatotropinomas are often macroadenomas, headaches and visual disturbances are also frequently reported [3, 89, 109, 110]. Weight gain and delayed puberty can also occur [79].
Diagnosis is based on clinical, laboratorial and imaging results. Laboratorial diagnosis is based on the detection of increased IGF-I and GH levels for age and gender in blood tests. Further investigation include oral glucose tolerance test. Somatotropinomas patients show failure of GH suppression or a paradoxical rise in GH after an oral glucose load of 1.75 g/kg although this test alone may result high false positive rate [89, 111]. Identification of a pituitary adenoma on MRI scan is needed for final diagnosis [79, 100].
First-line of treatment for somatotropinomas is transsphenoidal surgery for intrasellar microadenomas and noninvasive macroadenomas with biochemical control reported in 70% of microadenomas and 50% in noninvasive macroadenomas [100, 108, 112]. In large and invasive tumors surgery might be indicated to maximal removal and decompression but persistent disease is very common so medical therapy and/or radiotherapy may be necessary [3]. Pharmacologic agents such as long-acting somatostatin analogs (octreotide or, more recent, lanreotide) are often indicated both before and after surgery, when surgical cure is unlikely or when surgery fails to achieve biochemical control, and have been shown to be effective at shrinking tumor size and normalizing IGF-1 levels in 56% of cases [79, 100, 114,115,116,117,118,119,119]. D2 agonists can be used in patients with associated hyperprolactinaemia, or as adjuvant therapy if no biochemical control observed under high doses of somatostatin analogs [79, 100, 108, 112, 118]. Pegvisomant (GH receptor antagonist) has shown to be effective therapy for normalization of IGF-1 levels with less side effects [120]. Some groups has shown very good results in combined therapy with pegvisomant and long-acting somatostatin analogs [121]. Unfortunately there is limited data on pegvisomant treatment in children [3].
With the development of improved GH assays, the definition of cure of GH-secreting tumors has become increasingly rigorous, from an initial definition of an unsuppressed GH value of less than 10 mg/dL to the current definition that requires a return of the IGF-I levels to normal, with glucose-induced suppression of GH to less than 1 mg/dL (immunoradiometric assay) [89].
Radiotherapy is considered to be the third-line therapy . Hypopituitarism may occur in 30–50% of patients after radiotherapy [79]. Follow-up and monitoring of patients consists in measurement of IGF-I and post-oral glucose tolerance test GH levels together with MRI pituitary imaging [79, 100, 108, 112].
Thyrotropinomas (TSH-secreting adenomas): Thyrotropinomas are very rare during childhood and adolescence accounting for 0.5–2.8% of pituitary adenomas in children [79, 81, 122]. Only few cases reported in literature and described as macroadenomas (almost 90%) with symptoms as headache, visual disturbance, and symptoms and signs of hyperthyroidism [79, 89]. Laboratory tests show elevated free T4 and T3 with no TSH supression. The differential diagnosis might be with isolated central thyroid hormone resistance. Medical suppression of thyroid hormone synthesis may result in increased tumor growth [89].
Again transsphenoidal surgery is the treatment of choice for these tumors but may require adjunctive radiation therapy because its invasiveness and volume. Treatment with octreotide can normalize thyroid hormone levels in 80–90% and produce tumor shrinkage in up to 50% [123, 124].
Gonadotropinomas (FSH/LH-secreting adenomas): extremely rare in children, with few cases in literature, mostly FSH-secreting adenomas so clinical presentation is related to FSH secretion with precocious puberty , ovarian cyst or macroorchidism [81, 125]. Diagnosis is based on signs and symptoms, high levels of FSH and inhibin B, normal or low LH and testosterone, an increased FSH response to gonadotropin-releasing hormone stimulation and detection of a pituitary mass on MRI [125]. Nevertheless diagnosis is usually delayed until the appearance of symptoms related to tumour mass or pituitary hormone deficiency [79].
Non-functioning pituitary adenomas (no hormone secretion): non-functioning pituitary tumors are very rare in children accounting for only 4 to 6% of pediatric cases. In adults they represent 33 to 50% of the total number of pituitary lesions [77, 126, 127]. These tumors are believed to arise from gonadotroph cells and are frequently macroadenomas at diagnosis, may be invasive and presenting with growth and/or pubertal failure, symptoms of hyperprolactinaemia or hypogonadism especially in young females or with headaches and visual disturbances [3, 79, 89, 122, 128]. In some cases large adenomas may obstruct the foramen of Monro and cause hydrocephalus, but also may expand to cavernous sinus resulting in cranial nerve palsies or cavernous sinus syndromes [3].
Non-functioning pituitary adenomas may show hormone deficiencies: GH deficiency in up to 75%, LH/FSH in 40%, or ACTH and TSH deficiency in 25% [129]. Hyperprolactinemia is seen in less than 20% of patients secondary to stalk compression. Diabetes insipidous is only seen 9 to 17% of cases [3].
Surgery is the first line treatment in symptomatic or growing tumours but observation in small ones. Recommendation for surgical excision of intrasellar tumor or cyst depends on the tumor size, location, and potential for invasiveness [3, 89].
3 Other Sellar Tumours
As described at the begining of this chapter pituitary tumors are very rare in children. Craniopharyngioma and adenomas are the most frequent tumors in pituitary fossa, accounting for 90–95% of cases. Other lesions are even rarer than pituitary tumors in children. Some of them are described in summary.
Rathke cleft cyst : are non-neoplastic cystic lesions containing mucoid material in the sellar region accounting for less than 1.2% of pituitary lesions [131,132,132]. As craniopharyngiomas both have their origin from the remnants of the embryonic Rathke pouch [131, 132] and both may represent a continuum from the simpler Rathke cleft cyst to the more complex craniopharyngiomas [133]. Little data are available on the presentation or treatment outcomes but headache, hypopituitarism and growth delay were the most frequent presentation in a large serie [134]. On CT scanning, cysts usually are hypodense, non-enhancing by contrast and lack of calcification. In MRI, the cyst signal often is similar to cerebrospinal fluid on T1- and T2-weighted images [135]. Surgery is the treatment of choice when symptomatic.
Epidermoid and dermoid cysts: Epidermoid and dermoid cysts result from the inclusion of epithelial elements during embryogenesis. The contents of dermoid lesions are desquamated epithelium, sebaceous material, and, sometimes, dermal appendages, whereas epidermoid cysts contain a white cheesy material (keratin) within a thin capsule [136]. They appear as hypodense cysts with no enhancement in CT or hypointense in MRI [137] and show restriction to diffusion in diffusion-weighted images.
Chordomas: are slow-growing tumors of midline that arise from notochordal remnants in the clivus, usually producing sphenoid basis destruction and invasion. Chordomas of the sellar region are rare but may extend along the entire skull base and the sella (usually is destroyed instead of expanded), so location, bone destruction, and calcification differenciate from pituitary adenomas. Symptoms are headaches, visual deficit, neck pain, diplopia, and nasopharyngeal obstruction. Surgery is the treatment of choice associated with adjunctive radiotherapy due to complete removal difficulty [136,137,137].
Germinomas : are malignant intracranial tumors of granulomatous infiltrate around germ cells. They are the most frequent tumour of germ cell tumours group and usually appear at pineal region in children and adolescense (with male preponderance) but another locations may be hypothalamus, anterior III ventricle and intrasellar (not clear gender preponderance) [138, 139]. Diabetes insipidous is a common symptom seen in 80% of cases [136]. Another signs and symptoms may be visual symptoms, including failure of upper gaze and obtundation, delayed sexual development, hypopituitarism and precocious puberty [141,142,142]. Nowadays a combination of biopsy, chemotherapy and Radiotherapy are the gold standard of treatment with good prognosis depending on dissemination previous to diagnosis [139, 140].
Teratoma : are classified in three different subtypes included in the germ cell tumours group: mature, imature and mature with mailgnant transformation [138]. These tumors are found most commonly in the pineal region, followed by the suprasellar and hypothalamic regions, and rarely in the sellar region [136]. They derive from the pluripotential cells from all three embryologic layers (ectoderm, mesoderm, and endoderm): mature teratoma from two fully differentiated embryologic layers, immature teratoma by embryonic elements from one or two layers. Teratomas can involve the pituitary gland primarily or secondarily, by invasion [136]. Signs and symptoms are similar to germinomas (see previous description). Teratoma appear in imaging assessments as a well-delineated mixed cyst with calcification [136]. Treatment may be a combination of surgery alone when mature subtype or surgery plus chemotherapy plus radiotherapy in imature and mature with malignant transformation [139].
Langerhans cell histiocytosis: Langerhans cell histiocytosis is a histiocytic disorder derived from myeloid progenitor cells that express CD34 surface antigen belonging to the monocyte-macrophage complex [136, 143] with an incidence of 3–4 cases/million/year in children younger than 15 years old and male peponderance (2:1) [144]. Anterior pituitary dysfunction is less frequent than diabetes insipidous that may be present in 10–50% of cases. The most common findings on MRI are pituitary stalk thickening and absense of neurohypohysis bright spot in T1-weighted images [136]. The diagnosis may be based on symptoms, imaging techniques (to rule out systemic disease) and surgical biopsy of other involved sites. Biopsy of pituitary stalk is reserved to growing lesions or no other diagnosis possibility [145]. The main treatment is chemotherapy.
Arachnoid cyst : pathogenesis is not known but it is believed to arise from an arachnoid herniation into the pituitary fossa as a result of incompetence of the diaphragma sellae (embriology defect, after trauma or adhesive arachnoiditis) so true sellar arachnoid cyst is very rare [136]. MRI show cystic lesion with same intensity as cerebrospinal fluid in all sequences and no contrast enhancement [135, 137, 142] (Fig. 21.4).
Optic pathway glioma: Optic pathway gliomas account for 3–5% of all pediatric CNS tumors and represent the most common intrinsic optic nerve tumor [146]. 30% are associated with neurofibromatosis type 1 [136, 146]. Presentation in children varies depending on location into the optic pathway [146]. The most common symptoms are visual loss, headache, and proptosis [136]. Patients with lesions extending to the hypothalamic region may present with hydrocephalus, diencephalic syndrome, precocious puberty or endocrinological deficits [146]. The diencephalic syndrome associates emaciation, growth acceleration, hyperkinesis and euforia [135, 146]. Imaging examinations show a tumor with origin in chiasm or optic nerve, classically a hypointense lesion on T1 images with contrast enhancement. Although optic pathway gliomas are low-grade tumors, their behavior can be aggressive, and their management is often challenging including observation, surgery, chemotherapy and radiation [146].
Other extremely rare lesions in pituitary fossa: inflamatory diseases (sarcoidosis, xanthogranuloma), tumours (astrocytoma, ependymoma, gangliocytoma, hamartoma, metastasis, lymphoma, meningioma), vascular lesions (aneurysm) or infectious diseases (pituitary abscess, tuberculosis, fungal infections) [136].
References
Bancalari RE, Gregory LC, McCabe MJ, Dattani MT. Pituitary gland developement: an update. In: Mullis P-E, editor. Developmental biology of GH secretion, growth and treatment, vol. 23. Basel: Karger; 2012. p. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1159/000341733.
Suh H, Martin DM, Charles MA, Nasonkin IO, Gage PJ, Camper SA. Role of PITX2 in the pituitary gland. In: Amendt BA, editor. The molecular mechanisms of Axenfeld-Rieger syndrome. Boston, MA: Springer; 2006.
Keil MF, Stratakis CA. Pituitary tumors in childhood: an update in their diagnosis, treatment and molecular genetics. Expert Rev Neurother. 2008;8(4):563–74. https://doi.org/10.1586/14737175.8.4.563.
McCabe MJ, Alatzoglou KS, Dattani MT. Septooptic dysplasia and other midline defects: the role of transcription factors: HESX1 and beyond. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;25:115–24.
Kelberman D, Rizzoti K, Lovell-Badge R, Robinson ICAF, Dattani MT. Genetic regulation of pituitary gland development in human and mouse. Endocr Rev. 2009;30:790–829.
Kawamura K, Kouki T, Kawahara G, Kikuyama S. Hypophyseal development in vertebrates from amphibians to mammals. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 2002;126(2):130–5.
Borowiec B, Popis M, Jankowski M. Factors involved in the development on pituitary and hypothalamus: a short review. Med J Cell Biol. 2018;6(4):150–4. https://doi.org/10.2478/acb-2018-0024.
Sheng HZ, Westphal H. Early steps in pituitary organogenesis. Trends Genet. 1999;15:236–40.
Keil MF, Stratakis CA. Pituitary tumors in childhood: an update in their diagnosis, treatment and molecular genetics. Expert Rev Neurother. 2008 April;8(4):563–74. https://doi.org/10.1586/14737175.8.4.563.
Zhu X, Gleiberman AS, Rosenfeld MG. Molecular physiology of pituitary development: signaling and transcriptional networks. Physiol Rev. 2007;87(3):933–63. Excellent review of pathogenesis of pituitary adenomas
Porter KR, et al. Prevalence estimates for primary brain tumors in the United States by age, gender, behavior, and histology. Neuro-Oncology. 2010;12(6):520–7.
Müller HL. Diagnostics, treatment, and follow-up in craniopharyngioma. Front Endocrinol. 2011;2., Article 70:1. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2011.00070.
Garnett MR, Puget S, Grill J, Rose CS. Craniopharyngioma. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2007;2:18.
Bunin GR, Surawicz TS, Witman PA, Preston-Martin S, Davis F, Bruner JM. The descriptive epidemiology of craniopharyngioma. J Neurosurg. 1998;89(4):547–51.
Hölsken A, Sill M, Merkle J, Schweizer L, Buchfelder M, Flitsch J, Fahlbusch R, Metzler M, Kool M, Stefan M. Adamantinomatous and papillary craniopharyngiomas are characterized by distinct. Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2016;4:20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40478-016-0287.
Prabhu VC, Brown HG. The pathogenesis of craniopharyngiomas. Childs Nerv Syst. 2005;21:622–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-005-1190-9.
Bobustuc GC, Groves MD, Fuller GN, DeMonte F. Craniopharyngioma. Med Care. 2002;28:58–78.
Frazier CH, Alpers BJ. Adamantinoma of the craniopharyngeal duct. Arch Neurol Psychiatr. 1931;26:905–67.
Love JG, Marshall TM. Craniopharyngiomas (pituitary adamantinomas). Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1950;90:591–601.
Hoffmann A, Boekhoff S, Gebhardt U, Sterkenburg AS, Daubenbüchel AMM, Eveslage M, et al. History before diagnosis in childhood craniopharyngioma: associations with initial presentation and long-term prognosis. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015;173:853–62. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-15-0709.
Jensterle M, Jazbinsek S, Bosnjak R, Popovic M, Zaletel LZ, Vesnaver TV, Kotnik BF, Kotnik P. Advances in the management of craniopharyngioma in children and adults. Radiol Oncol. 2019;53(4):388–96. https://doi.org/10.2478/raon-2019-0036.
Mortini P, Losa M, Pozzobon G, Barzaghi R, Riva M, Acerno S, et al. Neurosurgical treatment of craniopharyngioma in adults and children: early and long-term results in a large case series. J Neurosurg. 2011;114:1350–9. https://doi.org/10.3171/2010.11.JNS10670.
Fitz CR, Wortzman G, Harwood-Nash DC, Holgate RC, Barry JF, Boldt DW. Computer tomography in craniopharyngiomas. Radiology. 1978;127:687–91.
Curran JG, O’Connor E. Imaging of craniopharyngioma. Childs Nerv Syst. 2005;21:635–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-005-1245-y.
Osborn AG. Diagnostic imaging brain. Salt Lake City: Amirsys Inc.; 2004.
Ahmadi J, Destian S, Apuzzo MLJ, Segall HD, Zee CS. Cystic fluid in craniopharyngiomas: MR imaging and quantitative analysis. Radiology. 1992;182:783–5.
Majos C, Coli S, Aguilera C, Acebes JJ, Pons LC. Imaging of giant pituitary adenomas. Neuroradiology. 1998;40:651–5.
Igarashi T, Saeki N, Yamaura A. Long term magnetic resonance imaging follow-up of asymptomatic sellar tumors—their natural history and surgical indications. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 1999;39:592–9.
Wang YXJ, Jiang H, He GX. Atypical magnetic resonance imaging findings of craniopharyngioma. Australas Radiol. 2001;45:52–7.
Daubenbüchel AM, Müller HL. Neuroendocrine disorders in pediatric Craniopharyngioma patients. J Clin Med. 2015;4:389–413. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm4030389.
Muller HL. Childhood craniopharyngioma. Recent advances in diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Horm Res. 2008;69:193–202.
Hoffman HJ, De Silva M, Humphreys RP, Drake JM, Smith ML, Blaser SI. Aggressive surgical management of craniopharyngiomas in children. J Neurosurg. 1992;76:47–52.
Elliott RE, Wisoff JH. Surgical management of giant pediatric craniopharyngiomas. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2010;6:403–16.
Poretti A, Grotzer MA, Ribi K, Schonle E, Boltshauser E. Outcome of craniopharyngioma in children: long-term complications and quality of life. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2004;46:220–9.
Ahmet A, Blaser S, Stephens D, Guger S, Rutkas JT, Hamilton J. Weight gain in craniopharyngioma—a model for hypothalamic obesity. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2006;19:121–7.
Muller HL, Emser A, Faldum A, Bruhnken G, Etavard-Gorris N, Gebhardt U, Oeverink R, Kolb R, Sorensen N. Longitudinal study on growth and body mass index before and after diagnosis of childhood craniopharyngioma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89:3298–305.
Nuijts MA, Veldhuis N, Stegeman I, van Santen HM, Porro GL, Imhof SM, et al. Visual functions in children with craniopharyngioma at diagnosis: a systematic review. PLoS One. 2020;15(10):e0240016. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240016.
Bogusz A, Muller HL. Childhood-onset craniopharyngioma: latest insights into pathology, diagnostics, treatment, and follow-up. Expert Rev Neurother. 2018;18(10):793–806. https://doi.org/10.1080/14737175.2018.1528874.
Mohd-Ilham IM, Ahmad-Kamal G, Wan Hitam W, et al. Visual presentation and factors affecting visual outcome in children with Craniopharyngioma in East Coast states of peninsular Malaysia: a five-year review. Cureus. 2019;11(4):e4407. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.4407.
Schoenfeld A, Pekmezci M, Barnes MJ, Tihan T, Gupta N, Lamborn KR, Banerjee A, Mueller S, Chang S, Berger MS, Haas-Kogan D. The superiority of conservative resection and adjuvant radiation for craniopharyngiomas. J Neuro-Oncol. 2012;108(1):133–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-012-0806-7.
Stripp DC, Maity A, Janss AJ, et al. Surgery with or without radiation therapy in the management of craniopharyngiomas in children and young adults. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;58:714–20.
De Vile CJ, Grant DB, Kendall BE, et al. Management of childhood craniopharyngioma: can the morbidity of radical surgery be predicted? J Neurosurg. 1996;85:73–81.
Honegger J, Buchfelder M, Fahlbusch R. Surgical treatment of craniopharyngiomas: endocrinological results. J Neurosurg. 1999;90:251–7.
Kalapurakal JA, Goldman S, Hsieh YC, et al. Clinical outcome in children with recurrent craniopharyngioma after primary surgery. Cancer J. 2000;6:388–93.
Zada G, Kintz N, Pulido M, Amezcua L. Prevalence of neurobehavioral, social, and emotional dysfunction in patients treated for childhood Craniopharyngioma: a systematic literature review. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e76562. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0076562.
Sterkenburg AS, Hoffmann A, Gebhardt U, Warmuth-Metz M, Daubenbuchel AMM, Muller HL. Survival, hypothalamic obesity, and neuropsychological/psychosocial status after childhood-onset craniopharyngioma: newly reported long-term outcomes. Neuro-Oncology. 2015;17(7):1029–38. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/nov044.
Tomita T, Bowman RM. Craniopharyngiomas in children: surgical experience at Children’s memorial hospital. Childs Nerv Syst. 2005;21:729–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-005-1202-9.
Thompson D, Phipps K, Hayward R. Craniopharyngioma in childhood: our evidence-based approach to management. Childs Nerv Syst. 2005;21:660–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-005-1210-9.
Puget S. Treatment strategies in childhood craniopharyngioma. Front Endocrinol. 2012;3., Article 64:1. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2012.00064.
Cohen M, Guger S, Hamilton J. Long term sequelae of pediatric craniopharyngioma – literature review and 20 years of experience. Front Endocrinol. 2011;2., Article 81:1. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2011.00081.
Cohen M, Bartels U, Branson H, Kulkarni AV, Hamilton J. Trends in treatment and outcomes of pediatric craniopharyngioma, 1975–2011. Neuro-Oncology. 2013;15(6):767–74. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuonc/not026.
Yamada S, Fukuhara N, Oyama K, Takeshita A, Takeuchi Y, Ito J, Inoshita N. Surgical outcome in 90 patients with craniopharyngioma: an evaluation of transsphenoidal surgery. World Neurosurg. 2010;74:320–30.
Muller HL, Gebhardt U, Teske C, Faldum A, Zwiener I, Warmuth-Metz M, Pietsch T, Pohl F, Sorensen N, Calaminus G. Post-operative hypothalamic lesions and obesity in childhood craniopharyngioma: results of the multinational prospective trial kraniopharyngeom 2000 after 3-year follow-up. Eur J Endocrinol. 2011;165:17–24.
De Vile CJ, Grant DB, Hayward RD, Kendall BE, Neville BG, Stanhope R. Obesity in childhood craniopharyngioma: relation to post-operative hypothalamic damage shown by magnetic resonance imaging. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996;81:2734–7.
Holmer H, Ekman B, Bjork J, Nordstom CH, Popovic V, Siversson A, Erfurth EM. Hypothalamic involvement predicts cardiovascular risk in adults with childhood onset craniopharyngioma on long-term GH therapy. Eur J Endocrinol. 2009;161:671–9.
Muller HL, Bueb K, Bartels U, Roth C, Harz K, Graf N, Korinthenberg R, Bettendorf M, Kuhl J, Gutjahr P, et al. Obesity after childhood craniopharyngioma—German multicenter study on pre-operative risk factors and quality of life. Klin Padiatr. 2001;213:244–9.
Srinivasan S, Ogle GD, Garnett SP, Briody JN, Lee JW, Cowell CT. Features of the metabolic syndrome after childhood craniopharyngioma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89:81–6.
Mong S, Pomeroy SL, Cecchin F, Juraszek A, Alexander ME. Cardiac risk after craniopharyngioma therapy. Pediatr Neurol. 2008;38:256–60.
Pereira AM, Schmid EM, Schutte PJ, Voormolen JH, Biermasz NR, van Thiel SW, Corssmit EP, Smit JW, Roelfsema F, Romijn JA. High prevalence of long-term cardiovascular, neurological and psychosocial morbidity after treatment for craniopharyngioma. Clin Endocrinol. 2005;62:197–204.
Caldarelli M, Massimi L, Tamburrini G, Cappa M, Di Rocco C. Long-term results of the surgical treatment of craniopharyngioma: the experience at the policlinico gemelli, catholic university, Rome. Childs Nerv Syst. 2005;21:747–57.
Merchant TE, Kiehna EN, Sanford RA, Mulhern RK, Thompson SJ, Wilson MW, Lustig RH, Kun LE. Craniopharyngioma: the St. Jude children’s research hospital experience 1984–2001. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;53:533–42.
Steno J, Bizik I, Steno A, Matejcik V. Craniopharyngiomas in children: how radical should the surgeon be? Childs Nerv Syst. 2011;27:41–54.
Jung TY, Jung S, Moon KS, Kim IY, Kang SS, Kim JH. Endocrinological outcomes of pediatric craniopharyngiomas with anatomical pituitary stalk preservation: preliminary study. Pediatr Neurosurg. 2010;46:205–12.
De Vile CJ, Grant DB, Kendall BE, Neville BG, Stanhope R, Watkins KE, Hayward RD. Management of childhood craniopharyngioma: can the morbidity of radical surgery be predicted? J Neurosurg. 1996;85:73–81.
Muller HL, Gebhardt U, Faldum A, Warmuth-Metz M, Pietsch T, Pohl F, Calaminus G, Sorensen N. Xanthogranuloma, rathke’s cyst, and childhood craniopharyngioma: results of prospective multinational studies of children and adolescents with rare sellar malformations. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2012;97:3935–43.
Halac I, Zimmerman D. Endocrine manifestations of craniopharyngioma. Childs Nerv Syst. 2005;21:640–8.
Crom D, Smith D, Xiong Z, Onar A, Hudson M, Merchant T, Morris E. Health status in long-term survivors of pediatric craniopharyngiomas. Am Assoc Neurosci Nurses. 2010;42:323–8.
Kassam AB, Gardner PA, Snyderman CH, Carrau RL, Mintz AH, Prevedello DM. Expanded endonasal approach, a fully endoscopic transnasal approach for the resection of midline suprasellar craniopharyngiomas: a new classification based on the infundibulum. J Neurosurg. 2008;108(4):715–28. https://doi.org/10.3171/JNS/2008/108/4/0715.
Tang B, Xie SH, Xiao LM, Huang GL, Wang ZG, Yang L, Yang XY, Xu S, Chen YY, Ji YQ, Zeng EM, Hong T. A novel endoscopic classifcation for craniopharyngioma based on its origin. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):10215.
Flitsch J, Muller HL, Burkhardt T. Surgical strategies in childhood craniopharyngioma. Front Endocrinol. 2011;2:96. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2011.00096.
Park SW, Jung HW, Lee YA, Shin CH, Yang SW, Cheon J-E, Kim I-O, Phi JH, Kim S-K, Wang K-C. Tumor origin and growth pattern at diagnosis and surgical hypothalamic damage predict obesity in pediatric craniopharyngioma. J Neuro-Oncol. 2013;113:417–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-013-1128-0.
Asa SL, Ezzat S. The pathogenesis of pituitary tumours. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2(11):836–49.
Ezzat S, Asa SL, Couldwell WT, et al. The prevalence of pituitary adenomas: a systematic review. Cancer. 2004;101(3):613–9.
Burrow GN, Wortzman G, Rewcastle NB, Holgate RC, Kovacs K. Microadenomas of the pituitary and abnormal sellar tomograms in an unselected autopsy series. N Engl J Med. 1981;304(3):156–8.
Kane LA, Leinung MC, Scheithauer BW, et al. Pituitary adenomas in childhood and adolescence. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994;79(04):1135–40.
Abe T, Tara LA, Lüdecke DK. Growth hormone-secreting pituitary adenomas in childhood and adolescence: features and results of transnasal surgery. Neurosurgery. 1999;45(01):1–10.
Artese R, D’Osvaldo DH, Molocznik I, et al. Pituitary tumors in adolescent patients. Neurol Res. 1998;20(05):415–7.
Faglia G, Spada A. Genesis of pituitary adenomas: state of the art. J Neuro-Oncol. 2001;54(02):95–110.
Guaraldi F, Storr HL, Ghizzoni L, Ghigo E, Savage MO. Paediatric pituitary adenomas: a decade of change. Horm Res Paediatr. 2014;81:145–55. https://doi.org/10.1159/000357673.
Kunwar S, Wilson CB. Pediatric pituitary adenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84:4385–9.
Jackman S, Diamond F. Pituitary adenomas in childhood and adolescence. Pediatr Endocrinol Rev. 2013;10:450–9.
Steele CA, MacFarlane IA, Blair J, Cuthbertson DJ, Didi M, Mallucci C, Javadpour M, Daousi C. Pituitary adenomas in childhood, adolescence and young adulthood: presentation, management, endocrine and metabolic outcomes. Eur J Endocrinol. 2010;163:515–22.
Alexander JM, Biller BM, Bikkal H, Zervas NT, Arnold A, Klibanski A. Clinically nonfunctioning pituitary tumors are monoclonal in origin. J Clin Invest. 1990;86(1):336–40.
Spada A, Mantovani G, Lania A. Pathogenesis of prolactinomas. Pituitary. 2005;8(1):7–15.
Herman V, Fagin J, Gonsky R, Kovacs K, Melmed S. Clonal origin of pituitary adenomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1990;71(6):1427–33.
Xekouki P, Azevedo M, Stratakis CA. Anterior pituitary adenomas: inherited syndromes, novel genes and molecular pathways. Expert Rev Endocrinol Metab. 2010;5:697–709.
Chahal HS, Chapple JP, Frohman LA, Grossman AB, Korbonits M. Clinical, genetic and molecular characterization of patients with familial isolated pituitary adenomas (FIPA). Trends Endocrinol Metab. 2010;21:419–27.
Perry A, Graffeo CS, Marcellino C, Pollock BE, Wetjen NM, Meyer FB. Pediatric pituitary adenoma: case series, review of the literature, and a Skull Base treatment paradigm. J Neurol Surg B. 2018;79:91–114. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1625984. ISSN 2193-6331
Lafferty AR, Chrousos GP. Pituitary tumors in children and adolescents. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000;84(12):4317–23. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.84.12.6215.
Delman BN. Imaging of pediatric pituitary abnormalities. Endocrinol Metab Clin N Am. 2009;38:673–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecl.2009.09.001.
Partington MD, Davis DH, Laws ER Jr, Scheithauer BW. Pituitary adenomas in childhood and adolescence. Results of transsphenoidal surgery. J Neurosurg. 1994;80:209–16.
Mindermann T, Wilson CB. Pituitary adenomas in childhood and adolescence. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 1995;8:79–83.
Tyson D, Reggiardo D, Sklar C, David R. Prolactin-secreting macroadenomas in adolescents. Response to bromocriptine therapy. Am J Dis Child. 1993;147:1057–61.
Acharya SV, Gopal RA, Bandgar TR, Joshi SR, Menon PS, Shah NS. Clinical profile and long term follow up of children and adolescents with prolactinomas. Pituitary. 2009;12:186–9.
Eren E, Yapıcı Ş, Çakır ED, Ceylan LA, Sağlam H, Tarım Ö. Clinical course of hyperprolactinemia in children and adolescents: a review of 21 cases. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol. 2011;3:65–9.
Melmed S, Casanueva FF, Hoffman AR, Kleinberg DL, Montori WM. Diagnosis and treatment of hyperprolactinemia: an Endocrine Society practical guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011;96:273–88.
Fideleff HL, Boquete HR, Suárez MG, Azaretzky M. Prolactinoma in children and adolescents. Horm Res. 2009;72:197–205.
Abe T, Lüdecke DK. Transnasal surgery for prolactin-secreting pituitary adenomas in childhood and adolescence. Surg Neurol. 2002;57(06):369–78. discussion 378–379
Colao AM, Loche S, Cappa M, Di Sarno A, Landi ML, Sarnacchiaro F, Faccioli G, Lombardi G. Prolactinomas in children and adolescents. Clinical presentation and long-term follow-up. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998;83:2777–80.
Lim EM, Pullan P, et al. Biochemical assessment and long-term monitoring in patients with acromegaly: statement from a joint consensus conference of the growth hormone research society and the pituitary society. Clin Biochem Rev. 2005;26:41–3.
Magiakou MA, Mastorakos G, Oldfield EH, Gomez MT, Doppman JL, Cutler GB, Nieman LK, Chrousos GP. Cushing’s syndrome in children and adolescents, presentation, diagnosis and therapy. N Engl J Med. 1994;331:629–36.
Storr HL, Isidori AM, Monson JP, Besser GM, Grossman AB, Savage MO. Pre-pubertal Cushing’s disease is more common in males, but there is no increase in severity at diagnosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004;89:3818–20.
Storr HL, Alexandraki KI, Martin L, Isidori AM, Kaltsas G, Monson JP, Besser GM, Matson M, Evanson J, Afshar F, Sabin I, Savage MO, Grossman AB. Comparisons in the epidemiology, diagnostic features and cure rate by transsphenoidal therapy between paediatric and adult Cushing’s disease. Eur J Endocrinol. 2011;164:667–74.
Laws ER, Scheithauer BW, Groover RV. Pituitary adenomas in childhood and adolescence. Prog Exp Tumor Res. 1987;30:359–61.
Partington MD, Davis DH, Laws ER Jr. Scheithauer BW. Pituitary adenomas in childhood and adolescence. Results of transsphenoidal surgery. J Neurosurg. 1994;80(2):209–16.
Jennings AS, Liddle GW, Orth DN. Results of treating childhood Cushing’s disease with pituitary irradiation. N Engl J Med. 1977;297(18):957–62.
Batista DL, Riar J, Keil M, Stratakis CA. Diagnostic tests for children who are referred for the investigation of Cushing syndrome. Pediatrics. 2007;120(3):e575–86. ** The most recent research article on the clinical diagnosis of Cushing syndrome in children; a diagnostic algorithm is proposed for differentiation between Cushing disease and adrenal causes of Cushing syndrome
Personnier C, Cazabat L, Bertherat J, Gaillard S, Souberbielle JC, Habrand JL, Dufour C, Clauser E, Sainte Rose C, Polak M. Clinical features and treatment of pediatric somatotropinoma: case study of an aggressive tumor due to a new AIP mutation and extensive literature review. Horm Res Paed. 2011;75:392–402.
Laws ER Jr, Scheithauer BW, Carpenter S, Randall RV, Abboud CF. The pathogenesis of acromegaly. Clinical and immunocytochemical analysis in 75 patients. J Neurosurg. 1985;63(1):35–8.
Pandey P, Ojha BK, Mahapatra AK. Pediatric pituitary adenoma: a series of 42 patients. J Clin Neurosci. 2005;12(2):124–7.
Holl RW, Bucher P, Sorgo W, Heinze E, Homoki J, Debatin KM. Suppression of growth hormone by oral glucose in the evaluation of tall stature. Horm Res. 1999;51:20–4.
Andersen M. Management of endocrine disease: GH excess – diagnosis and medical therapy. Eur J Endocrinol. 2013;170:R31–41.
Ayuk J, Stewart SE, Stewart PM, Sheppard MC. Efficacy of Sandostatin LAR (long-acting somatostatin analogue) is similar in patients with untreated acromegaly and in those previously treated with surgery and/or radiotherapy. Clin Endocrinol. 2004;60(3):375–81.
Jallad RS, Musolino NR, Salgado LR, Bronstein MD. Treatment of acromegaly with octreotide LAR: extensive experience in a Brazilian institution. Clin Endocrinol. 2005;63(2):168–75.
Bronstein MD. Acromegaly: molecular expression of somatostatin receptor subtypes and treatment outcome. Front Horm Res. 2006;35:129–34.
Cozzi R, Attanasio R, Montini M, et al. Four-year treatment with octreotide-long-acting repeatable in 110 acromegalic patients: predictive value of short-term results? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(7):3090–8.
Gilbert J, Ketchen M, Kane P, et al. The treatment of de novo acromegalic patients with octreotide LAR: efficacy, tolerability and cardiovascular effects. Pituitary. 2003;6(1):11–8.
Sheppard MC. Primary medical therapy for acromegaly. Clin Endocrinol. 2003;58(4):387–99.
Newman CB, Melmed S, Snyder PJ, et al. Safety and efficacy of long-term octreotide therapy of acromegaly: results of a multicenter trial in 103 patients–a clinical research center study (published erratum appears in J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1995 80 (11): 3238). J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1995;80:2768–75.
Trainer PJ, Drake WM, Katznelson L, et al. Treatment of acromegaly with the growth hormonereceptor antagonist pegvisomant. N Engl J Med. 2000;342(16):1171–7.
Feenstra J, de Herder WW, ten Have SM, et al. Combined therapy with somatostatin analogues and weekly pegvisomant in active acromegaly. Lancet. 2005;365(9471):1644–6.
Rabbiosi S, Peroni E, Tronconi GM, Chiumello G, Losa M, Weber G. Asymptomatic thyrotropin-secreting pituitary macroadenoma in a 13-year old girl: successful first-line treatment with somatostatin analogs. Thyroid. 2012;22:1076–9.
Brucker-Davis F, Oldfield EH, Skarulis MC, Doppman JL, Weintraub BD. Thyrotropin-secreting pituitary tumors: diagnostic criteria, thyroid hormone sensitivity, and treatment outcome in 25 patients followed at the National Institutes of Health. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84:476–86.
Fukuda T, Yokoyama N, Tamai M, et al. Thyrotropin secreting pituitary adenoma effectively treated with octreotide. Intern Med. 1998;37:1027–30.
Clemente M, Caracseghi F, Gussinyer M, Yeste D, Albisu M, Vázquez E, Ortega A, Carrascosa A. Macroorchidism and panhypopituitarism: two different forms of presentation of FSH-secreting pituitary adenomas in adolescence. Horm Res Paediatr. 2011;75:225–30.
Pack SD, Qin LX, Pak E, et al. Common genetic changes in hereditary and sporadic pituitary adenomas detected by comparative genomic hybridization. Genes Chromosom Cancer. 2005;43(1):72–82.
Boikos SA, Stratakis CA. Carney complex: the first 20 years. Curr Opin Oncol. 2007;19(1):24–9.
Yamaguchi-Okada M, Inoshita N, Nishioka H, Fukuhara N, Yamada S. Clinicopathological analysis of nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas in patients younger than 25 years of age. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2012;9:511–6.
Thapar K, Kovacs K, Laws ER. The classification and molecular biology of pituitary adenomas. Adv Tech Stand Neurosurg. 1995;22:3–53.
Takanashi J, Tada H, Barkovich AJ, Saeki N, Kohno Y. Pituitary cysts in childhood evaluated by MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005;26:2144–7.
Berry RG, Schlezinger NS. Rathke-cleft cysts. Arch Neurol. 1959;1:48–58.
Voelker JL, Campbell RL, Muller J. Clinical, radiographic, and pathological features of symptomatic Rathke’s cleft cysts. J Neurosurg. 1991;74:535–44.
Harrison MJ, Morgello S, Post KD. Epithelial cystic lesions of the sellar and parasellar region: a continuum of ectodermal derivatives? J Neurosurg. 1994;80:1018–25.
Jahangiri A, Molinaro AM, Tarapore PE, Blevins L Jr, Auguste KI, Gupta N, Kunwar S, Aghi MK. Rathke cleft cysts in pediatric patients: presentation, surgical management, and postoperative outcomes. Neurosurg Focus. 2011;31(1):E3.
Post KD, McCormick PC, Bello JA. Differential diagnosis of pituitary tumors. Endocrinol Metab Clin N Am. 1987;16(3):609–45.
Glezer A, Paraiba DB, Bronstein MD. Rare Sellar Lesions. Endocrinol Metab Clin N Am. 2008;37:195–211.
Iqbal J, Kanaan I, Al HM. Non-neoplastic cystic lesions of the sellar region: presentation, diagnosis and management of eight cases and review of the literature. Acta Neurochir. 1999;141:389–98.
Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G, von Deimling A, Figarella-Branger D, Cavenee WK, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Kleihues P, Ellison DW. The 2016 World Health Organization classification of tumors of the central nervous system: a summary. Acta Neuropathol. 2016;131(6):803–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1.
Gao Y, Jiang J, Liu Q. Clinicopathological and immunohistochemical features of primary central nervous system germ cell tumors: a 24-years experience. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2014;7(10):6965–72.
Lee D, Suh YL. Histologically confirmed intracranial germ cell tumors; an analysis of 62 patients in a single institute. Virchows Arch. 2010;457:347–57.
Matsutani M, Sano K, Takakura K, Fujimaki T, Nakamura O, Funata N, Seto T. Primary intracranial germ cell tumors: a clinical analysis of 153 histologically verified cases. J Neurosurg. 1997;86:446–55.
Kaur H, Singh D, Peereboom DM. Primary central nervous system germ cell tumors. Curr Treat Options in Oncol. 2003;4:491–8.
Favara BE, Jaffe R. The histopathology of Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Br J Cancer Suppl. 1994;23:S17–23.
Horn E, Coons SW, Spetzler RF, et al. Isolated Langerhans cell histiocytosis of the infundibulum presenting with fulminant diabetes insipidus. Childs Nerv Syst. 2006;22:542–4.
Prosch H, Grois N, Bokkerink J, et al. Central diabetes insipidus: is it Langerhans cell histiocytosis of the pituitary stalk? A diagnostic pitfall. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2006;46(3):363–6.
Fried I, Tabori U, Tihan T, Reginald A, Bouffet E. Optic pathway gliomas: a review. CNS Oncol. 2013;2(2):143–59.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Irañeta, A.S. (2022). Craniopharyngioma and Other Sellar Tumors. In: Alexiou, G., Prodromou, N. (eds) Pediatric Neurosurgery for Clinicians. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80522-7_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80522-7_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-80521-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-80522-7
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)