Abstract
Pesticides are chemical compounds designed to be used as plant protection products (PPPs). They are applied in the field for the protection of plants against pests, weeds, and several diseases that affect and decrease the quantity and quality of agricultural crop products. After their environmental release, these synthetic substances undergo a variety of abiotic and biotic processes which determine their distribution in the environmental compartments, and consequently their fate and persistence. Sorption, desorption, and leaching are some of the processes that are included among the most important transportation pathways. Due to their extensive application and their potential ecotoxicological effects, the global scientific interest focusing on the research of the environmental fate and behavior of pesticides after their entrance in the environmental matrices is undiminished. The present chapter is a review of the recent scientific literature regarding the recent research on the fate of pesticides in soil regarding the processes of sorption/desorption and leaching. Based on the gathered information derived from the reviewed articles on the subject published in the last 5.5 years (from 01/01/2016 to 30/06/2021), useful conclusions and observations are reported about research trends. Furthermore, knowledge gaps in the current research are highlighted and suggestions for future research on this topic are also discussed.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
- Desorption
- Environmental fate
- Leaching
- Organic micropollutants
- Persistent organic pollutants
- Pesticides
- Soil distribution
- Sorption
- Transportation
1 Introduction
A wide variety of anthropogenic compounds with organic nature that are synthetic compounds produced for multiple purposes or applications are extensively used worldwide, such as personal care products, drugs and medicines, pharmaceuticals, plastics and polymers, dyes, solvents, endocrine-disrupting compounds, and several others. Pesticides, also known as PPPs, are also included among this long list of persistent organic pollutants (POPs) which are characterized as potential toxicants toward nontarget organisms.
More specific, the term pesticide is used for substances designed to be applied as PPPs against various pests, weeds, and diseases that are harmful to cultivated plants, and consequently threat and affect the crop yields. Their molecules are characterized by different physicochemical properties, mobility, bioavailability, and toxicity.
Concentrations of pesticides have been detected and measured in numerous environmental samples such as soil [1], surface water [2, 3], groundwater [4], sediment [2, 3], edible cultured fruits, vegetables, and agricultural products [5, 6]. In a recent study of Zhang et al. [3] investigating the occurrence of five target neonicotinoid insecticides in soil-water-sediment systems of urban and rural areas in South China the concentration levels of reported results were within the range of 0.003–229 ng g−1 (dry weight, dw), 7.94–636 ng L−1, and 0.017–31.3 ng g−1 (dw) for soil, water, and sediment samples, respectively. According to a different study of Pico et al. [6] the pesticide residues of 15 compounds (mainly insecticides and fungicides) out of a list of 62 substances belonging to a wide variety of chemical classes were detected in fruits from Saudi Arabia, whereas in 20% of the samples the detectable concentrations were above the maximum residue limits (MRLs). The results of a survey conducted by Zambito Marsala et al. [4] revealed the presence of seven pesticides (chlorantraniliprole, dimethomorph, fluopicolide, metalaxyl, penconazole, and tetraconazole) in 30% of the studied wells (situated in the Tidone Valley, Province of Piacenza, North-West of Italy) at a level higher than 0.1 μg L−1 that is the Environmental Quality Standard (EQS) for groundwater.
Based on the relevant published scientific literature, the occurrence, distribution, and persistence of those POPs in the ecosystems is a subject on which the interest of the global scientific community is focused undiminished. Therefore, the aim of the present study is to carry out a review concerning the scientific articles published within the last 5.5 years (from 01/01/2016 to 30/06/2021), regarding the research of the environmental fate of pesticides in natural soil samples and under different environmental conditions.
In more details, the current chapter provides a review of pesticides and selected transportation and distribution processes, which take place into soil environments and therefore determine the bioavailability and persistence of the selected molecules into field systems. The first section provides general data about the topic of discussion, i.e., pesticides classification, pathways of their entry into terrestrial matrices, and interactions between different environmental compartments. Subsequent sections discuss selected migration and mobility mechanisms on which the global scientific research interest has been focused. Particularly, the studies focusing on the phenomena of sorption/desorption and leaching are reviewed, and their main findings are summarized.
2 Pesticides in Soil Samples
An expansive range of synthetic pesticides belonging to different chemical classes, possessing diverse physicochemical properties, and targeting to multiple and dissimilar pests are available in the market. Those compounds are mainly used in agriculture and applied in the cultured fields.
Based on the criteria of their chemical structure pesticides are subdivided into categories of anilides, amides, organophosphates, organothiophosphates, carbamates, benzothiazoles, triazines, neonicotinoids, organochlorines, and many other chemical classes. The classification of pesticides based on their target organisms includes the classes of acaricides, fungicides, herbicides, insecticides, nematicides, and plant growth regulators. According to the World Health Organization (WHO) the classification of pesticides, based on their hazard towards exposed organisms, contains five classes which are: extremely hazardous (Class Ia), highly hazardous (Class Ib), moderately hazardous (Class II), slightly hazardous (Class III), and unlikely to present acute hazard (Class U) [7].
The introduction of pesticides into the environment takes place mainly through agricultural and urban applications of disease vectors control. Once in the soil, pesticides can enter aquatic environmental bodies through alternative pathways. The main phenomena that are responsible for the mitigation of pesticides are diffuse processes, surface runoff, leaching, erosion, spray-drift, and atmospheric deposition after their volatilization [8, 9].
As shown in Fig. 1, possible transfer and distribution of pesticide compounds between soil, water, air, and biota matrices occur while the extent of each interaction and exchanging phase phenomenon is affected by several parameters, which in turn are simultaneously dependent on: (1) the molecule and its physicochemical properties, (2) the characteristics of the environmental substrate that contains the pesticide, (3) the application practice in terms of method, pesticide load, frequency, time season, and other factors, (4) the environmental conditions such as temperature, wind, etc., and finally (5) the geological and climatic characteristics of the site of the application [10, 11].
After entering the environmental matrices, they go under chemical, (direct/indirect) photochemical, or biological degradation processes that are possible to take place concurrently with other physical phenomena that determine their removal and distribution into different environmental substrates, such as adsorption, evaporation, and surface movement [9].
Data concerning the major factors affecting the environmental fate and persistence of a pesticide are detailed in Fig. 2. Consequently, due to their unquestionable occurrence in residual quantities contained in various natural matrices and the potential ecotoxicological impacts increased scientific concerns have been raised.
In the subsequent sections, some of the main distribution and degradation pathways that determine the fate of pesticides in soil-water systems are discussed and the most important results of reviewed bibliography are summarized and presented.
2.1 Sorption on Soil
Sorption of organic pesticides’ molecules onto the solid phase constituents of soil (such as clay minerals, organic matter (OM), oxides and hydroxides of aluminum and iron) is one of the most important and primary processes that can occur either via a reversible or a non-reversible mechanism and therefore influence the amount of the pesticide that remains mobile in soil-water systems or not. When present in the soil many pesticides are bound to soil colloids (clay, OM), and consequently become less readily available to plants than the molecules that are not adsorbed and continue to move in the soil solution.
Several reviews, overviews, and meta-analysis studies on the sorption of pesticides among other POPs have been published in the past few years [8, 10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. According to the conclusions and findings of all published review works, the general agreement that sorption of pesticides by soils has been stated and reported.
Moreover, according to the findings of the present review in the same period of the last 5.5 years (2016–2021), a large number of modeling studies dealing with the pesticides transport and mobility in soils, leaching risk assessments, sorption data (such as adsorption constants Koc), subsurface fate and dynamics have been published [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34].
Numerous theoretical and empirical sorption and desorption isotherm models have been used for the kinetics of the studied processes. Undoubtedly, (ad)sorption and/or desorption isotherms are frequently described by linear and nonlinear models among which Freundlich, Langmuir, Elovich, and Henry isotherm adsorption models are included which fit well the acquired experimental data. In Eq. 1 the logarithmic Freundlich model is described:
where KF is the Freundlich equilibrium constant (usually in μg(1–1/n) mL1/ng−1), Ce is the concentration of the selected and studied pesticide (usually in μg mL−1) after the equilibration, Cs is the concentration of the (ad)sorbed pesticide in soil matrix (μg g−1), and finally 1/n is the linearity degree.
With the condition that the adsorption of pesticides’ reactive groups over the soils’ particulates proceeds through a homogeneous distribution onto the adsorbents’ surface and that no later interactions occur between adjacent adsorbed molecules that occupy a single surface site, the Langmuir adsorption isotherm can be applied which is described by the mathematical formulations of Eqs. 2 (nonlinear form) and 3 (linear form):
where qe and KL are the concentration of adsorbed pesticide and the adsorption equilibrium constant, respectively, whereas qm and Ce are the maximum adsorption capacity and the concentration of the pesticide compound in soil-water system, correspondingly after the equilibration.
A multilayer adsorption is described by Elovich’s model that is expressed by the mathematical expression of Eq. 4:
Among the several main mechanisms that have been proposed to explain the adsorption of pesticides onto the soil colloid components, van der Waals force attraction (dipole–dipole interactions), hydrophobic bonding, hydrogen bonding, charge transfer (electrostatic attraction), ion exchange, and ligand exchange mechanisms are included. Depending on the nature and physicochemical characteristics of pesticide molecules and soil constituents (acidity or basicity, solubility, charge distribution on the molecule, polarity, molecule size, polarizability, etc.) simultaneously mechanisms may occur [14, 15, 18, 30, 32].
2.2 Leaching in Soil
Frequently, the movement of solute pesticides occurs through the soil profile by the effect of water, rainwater, or irrigation water. In this way, the vertical transportation of several pesticides into the soil column by runoff is often observed and the removal of those molecules from topsoil into lower subsoil depths takes place. This process is known by the term leaching and via this phenomenon, the downward migration of organic pollutants through the unsaturated zone to groundwater is possible to happen. Therefore, the potential displacement of organic pesticides from the soil surface and root zone to aquifers which are consequently vulnerable to pollution toward pesticides used in crop production is a subject on which the scientific interest has been focused.
Diffusion and mass flow phenomena that take place simultaneously may be involved in the leaching process of pesticides through soil in the solution phase. According to the published scientific literature, numerous models have been developed and evaluated that describe the leaching of organic pesticides in the root zone and the intermediate vadose zone, and the flushing of residual solute mass in the aquifer [25, 32, 33].
3 Results and Discussion
3.1 Overview of Found Data Published in the Last 5.5 Years Regarding the Transportation Behavior of Pesticides in Soils
The search was based on “Scopus Database” using as keywords the terms “pesticide,” and “soil,” and “sorption” or “desorption” or “leaching” process. Only original research publications since 2016 were considered, while all critical reviews and overviews published in the same period were excluded. Target pollutants are tested either individually or in mixture with other toxic pollutants.
Numerous scientific publications have arisen by researchers in the last 5.5 years concerning the investigations on the distribution and mobility of pesticides into soil compartments after their entrance into the field. More specific, during the current overview a great number of publications, overall 228 reports retrieved by “Scopus Database” have been found for the period 2016–2021 (during 01/01/2016 to 30/06/2021) regarding several different pesticides that belong to a wide variety of chemical families and have been investigated for their efficiency to be (ad)sorbed, desorbed on soils, and transported into groundwater.
The annual number of records published for each year overviewed on investigating the (ad)sorption, desorption, and leaching processes of pesticides in natural soil substrates is illustrated in Fig. 3. In this point it must be underlined the fact that the survey for 2021 is restricted only to the first half of the year (from 01/01/2021 to 30/06/2021) that explains the low number of findings. In general, a slightly variable annual number of scientific published data regarding the theme is noticed that approaches the mean value of 40 reports per year (Fig. 3).
Table 1 provides a summary of all the 228 reviewed published data found during the present review work for each individual pesticide compound reported. The search was based on “Scopus Database” using as keywords the terms pesticide, soil, and sorption or desorption or leaching process. Only original research publications since 2016 were considered, while all critical reviews and overviews published in the same period were excluded. Target pollutants are tested either individually or in mixture with other toxic pollutants.
According to the findings of the current review it is observed that among the overall 186 individual pesticides for which evaluation of adsorption/desorption capacity on soil, leaching, and transportation process has been surveyed the triazine herbicide atrazine is the one on which scientific interest has been focused (24 reviewed articles, Table 1), followed by the organophosphorus insecticide chlorpyrifos (21 reviewed articles, Table 1), the nicotinoid insecticide imidacloprid (15 reviewed articles, Table 1), the organophosphorus insecticide glyphosate (13 reviewed articles, Table 1), and the systemic fungicide metolachlor (13 reviewed articles, Table 1).
Hence, it can be stated that the scientific interest has been focused on the most commonly used and frequently detected pesticides or/and the pesticides exhibiting the longer half-lives that can remain in soil at levels above several hundreds of μg kg−1 and therefore pose a higher ability to threat exposed ecosystems and humans through food chain.
Based on the gathered and reviewed information of Tables 1 and 2 was created after the classification of each pesticide compound into 20 main chemical groups and one last group that was named “others” containing all the compounds that could not be classified to any of the previous 20 ones, such as aminomethylphosphonic acids, thiadiazines, triketones, uracils, nitriles, dicarboximides, anthranilic diamides; halogenated pyrroles; benzoylureas; pyridazinones; dimethoxybenzenes chloro substituted; isoxazolidinones; pyrazole carboxamides; disulfides; thiazole carboxamides; benzofuranyl alkylsulfonates; organobromines; thiadiazoles; phosphoramido compounds; phenylamides; dinitroanilines; isoxazoles; pyrimidines, phenols, etc.
As shown from the obtained information, it is obvious that the majority of the studies (≈ 18%) are dealing with the chemical group of organophosphorus pesticides and their transportation behavior in soils (Fig. 4). Afterward, the chemical groups of amide and acetamide herbicides and fungicides (with 12 totally studied chemical compounds), sulfonylurea herbicides (among which the most studied compounds were sulfometuron-methyl with five reports and nicosulfuron with four reports) and conazole fungicides (among which the most surveyed molecules were tebuconazole with 12 reports and penconazole with four reports) are following in the second, third, and fourth place by scoring almost 6.5%, 6%, and 5.5% of relative literature found, respectively.
In Table 3 detailed information is presented regarding the recently published scientific published data on the performed experimental procedures for the assessment of some selected pesticides’ transportation capacity and the main findings of some selected reviewed articles. According to the reviewed records addressed in this overview most studies employed and applied the OECD 106 guideline of batch equilibrium method for adsorption-desorption proposed by the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) [248] while the use of soil columns is also an alternative method preferred in a lower number of published research.
Furthermore, from the selected data that are presented in Table 3 it is obvious that there is a great variation between the estimated adsorption and desorption coefficient values of pesticides depended not only on the physicochemical properties of the tested soils but also on the characteristics of the pesticides. This observation is in accordance with other data published previously in research and review studies which highlighted the fact that besides the various sorption parameters which can be observed and measured for the same pesticide in different soil matrices, also a variability among different pesticide compounds adsorbed on the same soil matrix can exist [8, 14, 18, 145]. In the study of Zhang et al. [135] who investigated the sorption, desorption, and degradation kinetics of three neonicotinoid insecticides in four agricultural soils of different texture (two loam and two clay loam type) and different physicochemical properties such as cation exchange capacity (CEC), OM content, and pH a wide variety of sorption and desorption parameters were reported. For instance, the values of Freundlich equilibrium constant KF (in (mg/kg)(mg/L)−n) for clothianidin were calculated between the range of 0.992 and 3.39, whereas the same parameter of sorption affinity for the other two selected neonicotinoids imidacloprid and thiacloprid varied between 1.01–3.42 and 1.16–9.06, correspondingly. Low sorption of all three neonicotinoids was generally observed that was mainly affected by the SOM content following the order thiacloprid > imidacloprid ≈ clothianidin [135].
Many of the reported data were explained by the phenomenon of hysteresis in soil (ad)sorptive and/or desorptive processes. Based on our observation sorption-desorption hysteresis phenomena have been reported in several overviewed bibliographies influencing and controlling the distribution of pesticides into soil-water-biota systems [57, 60, 125, 173, 174, 199]. As reported in the literature, the effect of desorption hysteresis may be observed when the desorption of adsorbed pesticide molecules is not allowed to occur immediately due to the high-strength chemical bonds that were developed in the sorption process [57, 60, 125, 173, 174, 199]. Usually, hysteresis is quantified in terms of the extra Gibbs free energies of high-energy sorption sites that are sorbate- and sorbent-dependent, varying across sorption isotherms [125]. In the recently published study of Đurović-Pejčev et al. [125] regarding the adsorption-desorption behavior of clomazone in two Serbian agricultural the hysteresis effect that was observed in both tested soils increased with the increase of clomazone’s initial concentration in the soil-water system, whereas the percentage of desorbed amount during successive desorption cycles decreased. On the contrary, decreased hysteresis coefficient of the atrazine desorption with increasing its concentration in the case of low value of initial atrazine concentration was reported by Huang et al. [57], while in the case that the initial atrazine concentration was high acted reversely, indicating that the mechanism for delaying desorption in the sorbents varied with the initial atrazine concentration.
3.2 Effects of Selected Factors on Pesticide Sorption and Leaching in Soils
3.2.1 Impact of Soil Organic Matter
Several published studies have shown that soil OM (SOM) content is regarded as one of the most crucial and predominant soil characteristics that control the extent to which sorption of organic hydrophobic molecules in natural soils happens [10, 118, 249].
As it has been well established in the relevant bibliography the chemical composition, physicochemical properties or characteristics, and nature of OM differ between soils originating from variable regions. Among the several different key factors on which the nature of SOM is dependent, the origin and age of the soil matrix, the occurring environmental conditions, and the practicable agricultural methods are included [118, 183]. For instance, according to the results a survey conducted by Xu et al. [250] regarding the carbon stabilization in aggregate fractions responding to straw input levels under different soil fertility levels it was found that varied rates of organic C occurred based on the soil fertility and plant input levels.
SOM in general consists of vegetal and animal detritus at different levels of decomposition and mineralization. SOM is correlated with the fertility of the soil as it is considered to play the primary role of the soil carbon sink, whereas its concentration varies between 1 and 6% overall. A wide range of saturated and unsaturated complex organic molecules with aromatic, aliphatic, hydrophilic, and hydrophobic substances are included in the diverse composition of SOM. Among other organic compounds carbohydrates, fats, lignins, proteins, and humic substances (fulvic acid (FA), humic acid (HA), and humin) are included. The allocation of contained functional groups (oxygenated: -OH, -COOH, -C=O, -C-O-C-, -C-O-O-C, etc.; nitrogen containing amine and amide: -NH2, -NH, aromatic ring, etc.) which act as sites of adsorption determine and regulate the degree of pesticides’ sorption on the soil surface and therefore the leaching behavior of pesticides into aquifers.
The recent findings of the study conducted by Wang et al. [62] regarding the FT-IR spectra characterization of soil-derived dissolved organic matter (DOM) for the investigation of atrazine binding during the sorption process onto black soil indicated that main compositions of soil DOM among others mainly contained proteins, polysaccharides, and humic substances that significantly enhanced the adsorption efficiency of atrazine by soil.
Numerous studies have shown that a positive correlation between SOM and adsorption coefficient values, for instance for alachlor (R2 = 0.80) [42] (R2 = 0.87) [43], carbendazim (R2 = 0.77) [94], chlorpyrifos (R2 = 0.82, p < 0.001) [119], endosulfan (R2 = 0.96) [168], flucetosulfuron (r = 0.910) [174], iodosulfuron (R2 = 0.87) [197], and triasulfuron (r = 0.987) [246].
In order to estimate the influence of SOM quality in the abamectin and atrazine KOC values the quality of contained HAs was analyzed by Novotny et al. [35] through the means of 13C solid state Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (13C NMR) and Principal Component (PC) Regression. Negative loadings for aliphatic compounds and positive loadings for aryl C, typical of partially oxidized pyrogenic C were reported. Because no correlation between KF values and SOM was observed, the normalized by OC values (KOC)were obtained that varied within the range of 1,100–11,400 mL g−1 for abamectin and 30–150 mL g−1 for atrazine. The SOM content was not enough to explain the wide KOC variation, whereas on the contrary the chemical structure of SOM could. Acquired results showed strong correlation of HAs with the abamectin KOC values (R2 = 0.91, p < 5 10−8) and weaker with atrazine KOC (R2 = 0.63, p < 0.0001), in addition to a smaller standardized slope for abamectin than for atrazine (1.01 and 0.76 respectively), which were explained by the higher hydrophobicity of abamectin, being thus more prone to interact with the polycondensed aryl groups from the pyrogenic C.
According to Parolo et al. [118], who investigated the sorption behavior of the nonionic pesticide chlorpyrifos on 12 representative natural soils of the North Patagonian Argentinian region the process of sorption was mainly affected by soil aliphatic components that were measured by FT-IR analysis on the whole soil samples. The values of normalized by the organic carbon (OC) content sorption coefficients varied between 9,000 and 20,000 L kg−1 (for %OC content 1.25–6.82), while a significant relationship between chlorpyrifos sorption (KOC) and the variables pH and A/B height band ratio (band A: aliphatic components, 2,947–2,858 cm−1 and band B: hydrophilic components, 1,647–1,633 cm−1) was found and reported (R2 = 0.66). Based on the derived model, KOC = 22,757 + 4,364 A/B −1,564 pH, it was observed that the ratio of the peaks’ height A/B seemed to influence favoring sorption whereas on the contrary soil pH seemed to have a significant opposite effect on sorption.
Recently, a positive correlation was reported by Mendes et al. [183] among SOM, clay content, and sorption K values of tebuthiuron and hexazinone in soil samples taken from an agricultural area of São Paulo, Brazil. The values of sorption coefficients K for the two tested pesticides after using the batch equilibrium method ranged from 1.2 to 2.9 mL g−1 for tebuthiuron and from 0.4–0.6 mL g−1 for hexazinone, respectively.
Humic substances and their relation to the sorption of eight selected agricultural pesticides (atrazine, carbaryl, flumioxazin, hexazinone, imidacloprid, MCPA, metsulfuron-methyl, and terbuthylazine) in eight volcanic soils that differed in the fulvic and humic constituents of their OM were evaluated by Alister et al. [50] and published results of their study indicated that HA content regulated the sorption between pesticide and soil, especially through the carboxylic groups.
The study of Gaonkar et al. [115] focusing on the evaluation of soil organic amendments and their impacts on the sorption of organophosphate pesticides on an alluvial soil highlighted that the net effect of the application of organic amendments was an increase in the sorption of two selected organophosphates, dichlorvos, and chlorpyrifos that depended on both the nature of DOM and pesticide properties, whereas according to the spectroscopic characterization large amounts of highly humified and aromatic material were mainly contained in used organic amendments.
The significance that SOM has in the environmental fate of acetamiprid, as well as the investigation of the interactions between acetamiprid and three fractions of humic substances was surveyed by Murano et al. [38] by performing batch equilibrium experiments by using various combinations of a field soil sample and three different fractions prepared (HAs, FAs, and humin isolated from the same soil). Based on the reported Freundlich isotherm constant values for the tested fractions (KF: 6.100 for humin, 4.179 for HAs and 4.756 for FAs) interactions of hydrophobic nature between humin and HAs or FAs were revealed, in which their dissociated carboxyl and phenolic groups became oriented to face the soil solution.
The influence of soil organic components determined by 13C CP/MAS NMR spectroscopy on the sorption of chlorpyrifos was assessed by Savini et al. [119] who reported that whereas aryl C relative proportion was positively correlated with KOC values, on the contrary, the correlation between alkyl C and O-aryl C proportions with KOC data is negative (R2 = 0.82, p < 0.001).
According to the research of Ćwieląg-Piasecka et al. [90] who compared the effect of two types of organic sorbents, HAs, and biochar, on the sorption-desorption processes of different polar pesticides (carbamates, phenoxyacetic acids, and aniline derivatives), the investigated HA exhibited high affinity to polar, ionic pesticides of high water solubility, which were adsorbed via specific interactions with HA functional groups. Specifically, HAs exhibited strong affinity for the ionic substances (percentage uptakes: 74.6 and 67.9% initial dose of 2,4-D and MCPA, respectively) and much weaker retention of nonionic carbamates (35.4% of carbofuran and 10.2% of carbaryl sorbed).
The published work of Chitolina et al. [184] investigating the Influence of soil depth on sorption and desorption processes of hexazinone revealed that the small differences that were observed in OC content between soil depths (of 0–10, 10–20, and 20–30 cm) affected hexazinone retention and the corresponding decreasing order of determined Freundlich coefficients (KF) values were 0.18, 0.11, and 0.08 g(1–1/n) L1/n kg−1.
Furthermore, the impact of exogenous OM (composted sheep manure) on the sorption and leaching of boscalid, flonicamide, myclobutanil, and penconazole pesticides was assessed by Pérez-Lucas et al. [82] and the obtained results of the conducted equilibrium experiments on an agricultural soil (SE Spain) showed that the sorption capacity of amended soil was significantly increased in all cases minimizing their potential for groundwater pollution. In addition, leaching experiments indicated with amended soil columns significantly limited the vertical movement of the pesticides in leachates especially for the cases of boscalid and penconazole.
3.2.2 Impact of Soil Inorganic Components
Minerals and rocks are the predominant inorganic soil components that are formed through lithogenesis and subjected to further diverse changes that are dependent on several factors and processes such as diagenesis, metamorphism, erosion, deposition, weathering, and transport [251]. The average chemical constituents of minerals (as natural inorganic compounds of Earth’s crust) are oxygen (50% w/w), Si (25% w/w) and mainly Al3+, Fe3+, Fe2+, Mg2+, Ca2+, Na+, and K+ cations (the rest 25% w/w) [251].
According to the overviewed data of the present study the clay minerals group (kaolinites, smectites, vermiculites, illites, and chlorites) has been demonstrated as the most important inorganic fraction for the sorption of synthetic pesticides. Inorganic portion of soil that is mainly the clay fraction contained in cases of soil matrices which are characterized with low OM contents is very important for the adsorption process of organic pesticides [110]. Therefore, apart from the SOM that has by definition high compatibility and strong association affinity for many nonpolar pesticides (thus offers adsorption sites for such molecules especially into soils with >3% OM) clay minerals also play an important role and have a substantial contribution to the process of sorption, specifically in the case of polar pesticides and soils and sediments with low OM content [252].
A wide diversity of mechanisms through which pesticides can be (ad)sorbed from soil/water systems on soil clay mineral has been reported in the relative bibliography, including H bonding, hydrophobic bonding, van der Waals interactions, anion exchange, cation exchange, and ligand exchange pathways [244].
The effects of clay content in soil on the sorption process of two organophosphorus pesticides diazinon and chlorpyrifos were examined by Copaja et al. [110] in a natural soil sample (Chile) and in a soil modified with clay addition (1% of kaolinite or/and montmorillonite). Acquired results showed that the addition of both clays into the soil resulted in increased amounts of both pesticides retained in the soil and hence lowered the possible contamination of the groundwater.
These results are in accordance with the positive correlation that was found and reported by Mendes et al. [183] among clay content, SOM, and tebuthiuron and hexazinone sorption Kd values (in the range of 1.2–2.9 mL g−1 and 0.4–0.6 mL g−1, for tebuthiuron and hexazinone, respectively).
The results of Bošković et al. [169] who conducted a study concerning the adsorption of the two conazole fungicides (epoxiconazole and tebuconazole) in 20 soils from the Czech Republic in relation to soil properties were very interesting. More specifically, among the “basic” (TOC, pH, clay), “advanced” (surface area, minerals) soil properties, and Kd coefficients that were evaluated in the multivariate analysis revealed for both fungicides a strong negative correlation with soil pH, and a lower positive correlation with soil organo-mineral complex (by means of TOC, clay, and surface area) and C and N in SOM. No correlation of adsorption parameters with particle sizes or CEC was observed.
According to the published data of Kumari et al. [174], regarding the investigation of the adsorption-desorption and leaching of the sulfonylurea herbicide flucetosulfuron in three Indian soils the acquired KF exhibited positive correlation with OC content (r = 0.910) and clay content (r = 0.746). On the contrary a negative correlation with soil pH (r = −0.635) was revealed.
The statistical multivariate tests conducted in the survey of Sidoli et al. [211] regarding the adsorption data of the herbicide S-metolachlor and two of its metabolites (metolachlor ethane sulfonic acid and metolachlor oxanilic acid) on 17 surface soils and three geological solids related the highest Kd values for the herbicide S-metolachlor with the soils and geological solids with the highest OC and clay-fraction contents. Similarly, the sorption values of the new insecticide cyantraniliprole in different types of soils (Russia) were studied by Kolupaeva et al. [137] via the batch equilibrium method and obtained KOC closely correlated with the OC and clay contents.
In a recent survey of Agbaogun et al. [103] on the adsorption behavior of five phenylurea herbicides by tropical soils (18 differently composed soils originating from southwestern Nigeria) statistically significant correlations (Pearson) were delivered between sorption parameters (Kd, Kf, and n) and specific soil and herbicide properties, among which pH, CEC, OC content, content of amorphous Fe and Mn oxides, clay/silt mass proportions, as well as molecular descriptors of octanol-water partition coefficient (log Kow) and molecular mass (MW) of the moderately hydrophobic herbicides, were included. Furthermore, the estimated Kd.mineral values of diuron (2.71), linuron (1.98), monuron (0.85), chlorotoluron (0.59), and isoproturon (0.56) reported in the same survey indicated that Kd.mineral contributed between 15 and 40% to the Kd average reported for these compounds, a fact that is implying that soil mineral fractions, vis-à-vis clay minerals, and the amorphous metal oxides, also contributed fairly significantly (about 15–40%) to the sorption of the five test compounds in the soils. Moreover, the intercorrelations between the basic properties of the soils used in this study revealed that extractable Fe and Mn oxides are significantly high and positive correlated with clay and silt contents and negative correlations with sand content [103].
Hiller et al. [201] tested the adsorption of Na-K-DMA MCPA salt (dimethyl ammonium-potassium-sodium salt of (4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy)acetic acid) on three agricultural soils by using column experiments and demonstrated the effect of clay and OC content on Na-K-DMA MCPA salt sorption despite the fact that small number of soil samples were tested. In a previously published survey of Peng et al. [247] both clay content and OM of soils were found to be important factors affecting the adsorption of triflumezopyrim in water-soil environment system. In the study of Rodríguez-Liébana and Peña [146] examining the adsorption-desorption capacity of dimethenamid and fenarimol onto three agricultural soils and how these processes are affected by treated wastewater and fresh sewage sludge-derived dissolved OC reported that in the case of fenarimol’s adsorption by the soil OC content seemed to be the major factor controlling the process, whereas in the case of the adsorption of dimethenamid the mineral fraction played the key role, especially in the matrix where clay:organic content ratio was high.
In a work of Marín-Benito et al. [26] studying and comparing the effect on the mobility of ethofumesate and terbutryn in soils and two organoclays (swelling and non-swelling clays modified with octadecyltrimethylammonium) was observed that the effect of the organoclay barriers was more significant for ethofumesate, whereas for terbutryn the effect of organoclays was close to that of certain organic residues. The effect of soil organo-inorganic compounds different in particle size on butachlor sorption was surveyed by Huang et al. [87] and results showed that the clay fraction was the highest in butachlor adsorption capacity but the lowest in desorption rate, while the sand fraction was the lowest in adsorption capacity but the highest in desorption rate. The published results of Ahmad [238, 246] regarding a pedospheric sorption investigation of the sulfonyl urea herbicide triasulfuron via regression correlation and regression analysis in selected soils gave a positive correlation between Kd and clay content (r = 0.980).
In the study of Prado et al. [166] regarding the mobility of the pesticide 2,4-D in clay soils it was concluded that the preferential flow caused by both high clay content and the presence of macrofauna pores significantly reduced the buffering capacity of the soil, increasing the risk of contamination by herbicides of the underlying aquifer. The addition of synthetic clay (oleate-modified hydrotalcite) by Gámiz et al. [207] to an agricultural soil affected the sorption, leaching, persistence, and enantiomeric composition of soil residues of two chiral fungicides, tebuconazole and metalaxyl. Specifically, the addition of clay at a rate of 1% increased metalaxyl soil sorption coefficient (Kd) from 0.34 to 3.14 L kg−1 and that of tebuconazole from 2.4 to 47.4 L kg−1.
Based on the regression equation that was proposed Gao et al. [231] for the sorption prediction of pymetrozine on six different soil samples: log KF = 4.3708–4.5709 × log (pH in 0.01 mol·L−1 CaCl2) + 0.4700 × log OC% + 0.0057 × sand (%) + 0.0022 × CEC (clay), with R2 = 0.9982, the clay content of soil positively affected the sorption of pymetrozine.
According to the findings of current review it is observed most of the found and overviewed articles investigating how soil inorganic minerals can affect the adsorption-desorption behavior of pesticides in the soil is focused mainly on crystal silicate clay mineral (for example, montmorillonite and kaolinite), while on the opposite the scientists focusing on soil metal oxides, such as iron oxides, aluminum oxide, are much less in number. In this direction of research was the study of Huang et al. [57] on the effects of amorphous Fe oxides on adsorption-desorption of atrazine in soil. Based on the conclusions of the study amorphous Fe oxides with relatively high specific surface area and relatively big number of protons donating functional groups demonstrated a relatively high sorption capacity and affinity for atrazine even though their complexation with SOM contained in natural soil inhibits their direct adsorption capacity.
The role of soil iron oxides (IOs) in the distribution and interactions of pentachlorophenol in soils was investigated by Diagboya et al. [225] and batch sorption studies were conducted on whole soils and soils selectively treated to remove IOs (IOR) and OM (OMR). As revealed by the kinetic models, sorption equilibrium occurred faster in the IOR soils than the untreated and OMR soils and therefore iron oxides played greater roles in the sorption of pentachlorophenol than the OM content.
The influence of Al-oxide on pesticide sorption to woody biochars with different surface areas (SA) was investigated by Shou et al. [199]. The published results of this survey revealed the enhanced sorption of the pesticide isoproturon to the Al-oxide-treated low-SA biochar that was positively related to the increased mesopore area.
3.2.3 Impact of Pesticides’ Physicochemical Properties
The chemical structure of a pesticide and some specific characteristics of its molecules determine its sorption behavior and its affinity to be sorbed on soil colloids. The nature of functional groups contained in the compound is a crucial factor. Several functional groups such as carboxyl, carbonyl, alcoholic and amino moieties are very important as they govern the process of binding. Enhanced adsorption capacity has been observed with the presence of the below functional groups in pesticides molecules in the increasing order: R3N+, –CONH2, −OH, –NHCOR, –NH2, –OCOR, and –NHR [18]. Especially the ability of amino group to be protonated (which is a property dependent on pK value of the molecule) leads to the sorption as cations, and thus is very important. Moreover, the participation of amino and carbonyl moieties into hydrogen bonding has also been revealed [18].
A study on the soil sorption of six basic (pirimicarb, pirimiphos ethyl, prochloraz, prometryn, quinoxyfen, and triadimefon), and six neutral (α-endosulfan, chlorpyrifos, fenthion, parathion, parathion methyl, and cis permethrin) pesticides was conducted by Vitoratos et al. [123] and based on the experimental data that were acquired hydrophobic, electrostatic, and polar interactions were implied.
The charge characteristic of pesticides, the equal or unequal distribution of electrons in its molecule producing temporary or permanent polarity, correspondingly, its weak or strong tendency to donate or adopt protons are only some of the pesticide properties that determine the mobility of pesticides into the soil-water bulk systems.
The sorption behavior of both ionizable and nonionizable pesticides in the presence of HA in soils was investigated by Ćwieląg-Piasecka et al. [90] and high affinity of investigated HA to polar, ionic pesticides of high water solubility, which are sorbed via specific interactions with HA functional groups.
Moreover, water solubility and hydrophobicity or lipophilicity, expressed with means of octanol/water partition coefficient (Kow or log Kow), are two of the most important physicochemical properties whose impacts on the sorption have been evaluated in several scientific surveys [20, 28, 122, 134]. Rodríguez-Liébana et al. [138] evaluated the adsorption behavior of six different pesticides (α-cypermethrin, deltamethrin, pendimethalin, thiacloprid, dimethenamid, and fenarimol) that differed in hydrophobicity (range of log Kow values: 1.26–5.8) in three organic poor soils (% OC content ≤1.2%). Obtained results indicated lower kinetic rates for the more hydrophobic pesticides (log Kow ≥ 4.6) compared with the other compounds under study. According to the intraparticle diffusion model that was used, a strong contribution of a rapid initial adsorption on soil surface for thiacloprid, dimethenamid, and fenarimol was observed, while moderate contribution for the hydrophobic pesticides was achieved.
3.2.4 Impact of Carbon-Rich Organic Amendments Applied to Soils
Numerous recent studies have confirmed the advantages and benefits that are gained in the improvement of soil characteristics (including fertility, adsorption capacity, leaching and remediation by the reduction of the contamination of the neighboring terrestrial and aquatic areas) after the application of a wide variety of carbon-rich by-products (which are known with the term biochar) that are prepared by the application of the pyrolysis technique on low cost by-products, agrowastes, and organic materials under high temperatures in the absence of oxygen [14, 16, 84]. Several different functional groups present in the structure of these biochars play an important role and lead to a stronger adsorption of the organic pesticides’ molecules. In general, it is well known that under higher temperature of pyrolysis the produced biochars have more aromatic units and pores for capturing more sorbates.
According to the results of Chin-Pampillo et al. [84], the addition of three different pyrolyzed agrowastes of pineapple stubble, palm oil fiber and coffee hull, as amendments in a tropical soil it was observed that the sorption behavior and persistence of bromacil and diuron was affected. More specific, the two first amendments resulted in an increase of bromacil’s sorption of three to four-fold and a three to six-fold change in diuron’s sorption, while the addition of the third biochar had little effect. Similarly, the published results of a survey conducted by Aldana et al. [67] on the effects of biochar addition on the leaching and sorption of the agrochemicals atrazine, diuron, enrofloxacin, oxytetracycline, and tetracycline in tropical soils showed that sorption was higher in biochar-amended soils than soils without biochar amendment and the used biochars were produced from mixed softwood, rice husk, and miscanthus straw, after pyrolyzed at 700°C.
In a recently published study of Cheng et al. [233] it is reported that overall the application of biochar in agricultural soils combined with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation can influence the decomposition and leaching of simazine, mitigate its accumulation in the topsoil, and consequently reduce the availability of the studied pesticide. Based on the findings of a review conducted by Siedt et al. [249] regarding the comparison of straw, compost, and biochar on the fate of pesticides in agriculture soils it is concluded that although biochar has the higher effectiveness of all in increasing the sorption capacity of soils however it cannot surpass straw and compost regarding the other aspects investigated (such as transformation and retention of nutrients, soil microbial communities, etc.). The impact of biochar addition to soils and sediments samples from four sites along Litani river basin on the adsorption behavior of three commonly used herbicides fluazifop, terbuthylazine, and triclopyr was assessed by Kchour et al. [173] and based on the derived results of the survey Kads values in biochar treated matrices increased considerably in comparison with the non-treated ones. Furthermore, according to the same study in the presence of biochar the phenomenon of sorption was not reversible, and hysteresis occurred.
Bentazone sorption and desorption studies executed by Ponnam et al. [74] revealed that the introduction of biochar not only improved several characteristics of the soil among which pesticide adsorption efficiency is included (pH, CEC, electrical conductivity), but also that lowered the desorption levels and thus enhanced soil quality. In a separate survey, Ponnam et al. [95] reported the same pattern of attitude for the case of carbofuran that was irreversibly sorbed by moderately acidic soil amended with biochar. The effects of raw feedstock and biochar (produced from soybean residues, sugarcane bagasse, and wood chips (grape)) amendments on sorption-desorption and leaching potential of the pesticides aminocyclopyrachlor, metolachlor, and imidacloprid were studied by Mendes et al. [47], and decreased availability of metolachlor and imidacloprid in soil was observed via increased sorption process. For the case of aminocyclopyrachlor the availability differed between the use of raw feedstock and biochar, while the most important impact on pesticide behavior was derived from biochar produced from wood chips pyrolysis. Reduced dissipation of thiamethoxam in a biochar-amended agricultural soil was reported by You et al. [242].
Numerous published data during the period 2016–2021 have demonstrated the increased adsorption efficiencies that were achieved (and possible lower pesticide leaching mitigation) after biochar amendments applied on different soils and for several pesticides, such as for acetamiprid [39], acetochlor [40], atrazine in the presence of Cd(II) [52] or not [60, 63, 64], bentazone [75, 77], boscalid [75, 77], cadusafos [88], carbaryl [90], carbofuran [90], chlorothalonil [109], chlorpyrifos [116, 117], clomazone [80], clothianidin [136], difenoconazole [143], 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) [90], diuron [117, 148], fenamiphos [88], glyphosate [117, 180, 182], imazapic [190], imazapyr [190], imazamox [189], imidacloprid [63, 136], isoproturon [63], 4-chloro-2-methylphenoxyacetic acid (MCPA) [90, 120], metalaxyl [206, 207], metolachlor [90, 214], picloram [189], pyrimethanil [75, 77], simazine [235, 253], tebuconazole [207], terbuthylazine [189], and thiacloprid [136, 240, 241].
The published results of Ćwieląg-Piasecka et al. [90] who examined the biochar as specific sorbents of several carbamate, phenoxyacetic acids, and aniline derivatives pesticides indicated that the biochar that was produced from wheat straw and used in the study preferentially attracted nonionic pesticides with relatively high log Kow values and low water solubility probably because of its moderately hydrophobic character. Therefore, the principal mechanism of pesticides’ attraction to biochar that was proposed was the hydrophobic bonding.
According to the findings of García-Jaramillo et al. [69], the role of biochar and biochar water-extractable substances on the sorption of pesticides onto soils is depended on soil and biochar properties and time of application, and these parameters need proper consideration before the application because reduction or increase in the mobility of ionizable organic compounds may occur. That was based on their observation that, in spite the enhanced soil sorption capacity of the herbicides azimsulfuron and penoxsulam that was observed after the application of raw biochar as soil amendment in two rice paddy soils, on the contrary, lessened azimsulfuron adsorption was reported in the washed biochar soil samples than in the washed biochar. This was attributed possibly due to the reduction of polar groups of biochar through washing step, which had no effect on penoxsulam adsorption.
3.2.5 Impact of Pesticide Mixture Interactions
It has been well documented that the co-presence of pesticides in chemical mixtures promotes changes in its behavior into soil due to synergistic or antagonistic phenomena that may occur [147, 153, 160].
The leaching of three selected pesticides, diuron, hexazinone, and sulfometuron-methyl, applied in soils with contrasting textures (sandy or clayey) and by two different modes, alone and in mixture was investigated by Dos Reis et al. [160]. The results of soil column experiments showed that when herbicides were applied in mixture of the commercial mixture diuron + hexazinone + sulfometuron-methyl, interactions among them could potentially promote changes in herbicide behavior in the soil. Hexazinone was reported to have the greater leaching potential and mobility along the soil profile compared to the other two studied molecules, whereas diuron remained at the top layer of the soil, and hence indicated that this herbicide has low soil mobility.
In a similar study conducted by Sousa et al. [153] regarding the sorption and desorption of diuron, hexazinone and their mixture in soils with different attributes it was revealed that in all tested soils, diuron and hexazinone showed higher sorption coefficients KF values when mixed. Carneiro et al. [147] surveyed the way that herbicide mixtures can affect the adsorption processes in soils under sugarcane cultivation. For that purpose, the sorption process of diuron, hexazinone, and sulfometuron-methyl in isolated and mixed conditions was examined. Results of the study refer that herbicide mixtures reduced the maximum adsorption (qe) in ≈50 (diuron), 56 (hexazinone), and 55% (sulfometuron-methyl) compared to isolated tests. Also, herbicide mixtures reduced the sorption rate (KF) 24 (diuron), 89 (hexazinone), and 66% (sulfometuron-methyl) compared to conditions isolated tests.
4 Conclusions and Future Perspectives
Regardless of their mode of application several different pesticide compounds that are unavoidably used in the terrestrial environment mainly for agricultural purposes (protection of crop quality and quantity) reach the soil and are subjected to biotic and abiotic processes which affect their distribution and transportation into the soil-water-biota systems. Binding to soil particles, known as sorption, desorption into the soil bulk, and vertical removal from topsoil into lower subsoil depths by leaching are unquestionably the predominant abiotic phenomena that influence their behavior and bioavailability into these ecosystems.
According to the findings of the current overview a great number of publications, overall 228 reports, have been found for the period 2016–2021 (from 01/01/2016 to 30/06/2021) regarding the sorption, desorption, and leaching of several different pesticides which belong to a wide variety of chemical groups. Obtained data revealed that the evaluation of adsorption/desorption capacity on soil, leaching, and transportation process for 186 individual pesticides, in total, have been investigated and reported in the scientific literature published in the last 5.5 years. Moreover, atrazine (triazine herbicide) is the pesticide on which scientific interest has been focused, followed by chlorpyrifos (organophosphorus insecticide), imidacloprid (nicotinoid insecticide), glyphosate (organophosphorus insecticide), and metolachlor (systemic fungicide). Results showed that the scientific interest has been focused either on the most used and thus frequently detected pesticides or/and on the pesticides that exhibit the longer half-lives and can remain in the water and soil at high levels (above several hundreds of μg L−1 or μg kg−1) and therefore pose a higher ability to threat exposed ecosystems and humans through the food chain.
Different sorption, desorption, and leaching attributes, behaviors, affinities, and characteristics were observed within the overviewed data indicating that the transportation and distribution fate of applied pesticides is dependent upon the combination of the studied soil/pesticide system. In general, among the most important soil factors that can affect the studied processes both OM and clay contents were included, whereas soil pH and CEC played a secondary role. Extended research concerning the enhancement of pesticide sorption and reduction of leaching into aquifers by a variety of different biochar amendments has been conducted.
A knowledge gap concerning the impact of pesticide mixture interactions on the adsorption on soils’ colloids, leaching potential, and mobility of pesticides along the soil profile is observed, as the overviewed surveys examining this topic are very scarce. Therefore, more surveys in this direction must be conducted in future research, since it is indisputable fact that chemical cocktails can promote variations in the behavior of individual pesticide compounds into the soil via possible and simultaneous synergistic or antagonistic phenomena.
References
Erban T, Stehlik M, Sopko B et al (2018) The different behaviors of glyphosate and AMPA in compost-amended soil. Chemosphere 207:78–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.05.004
Zhang C, Tian D, Yi XH et al (2019) Occurrence, distribution, and seasonal variation of five neonicotinoid insecticides in surface water and sediment of the Pearl Rivers, South China. Chemosphere 217:437–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.11.024
Zhang C, Yi X, Chen C et al (2020) Contamination of neonicotinoid insecticides in soil-water-sediment systems of the urban and rural areas in a rapidly developing region: Guangzhou, South China. Environ Int 139:105719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105719
Zambito MR, Capri E, Russo E et al (2020) First evaluation of pesticides occurrence in groundwater of Tidone Valley, an area with intensive viticulture. Sci Total Environ 736:139730. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139730
Philippe V, Neveen A, Marwa A et al (2021) Occurrence of pesticide residues in fruits and vegetables for the eastern mediterranean region and potential impact on public health. Food Control 119:107457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodcont.2020.107457
Pico Y, El-Sheikh MA, Alfarhan AH et al (2018) Target vs non-target analysis to determine pesticide residues in fruits from Saudi Arabia and influence in potential risk associated with exposure. Food Chem Toxicol 111:53–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2017.10.060
WHO (2020) World Health Organization recommended classification of pesticides by hazard and guidelines to classification (2019 edition). Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. World Health Organization, Geneva
Liu T, Xu S, Lu S et al (2019) A review on removal of organophosphorus pesticides in constructed wetland: performance, mechanism and influencing factors. Sci Total Environ Part 2(651):2247–2268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.087
Mamy L, Bonnot K, Benoit P et al (2021) Assessment of pesticides volatilization potential based on their molecular properties using the TyPol tool. J Hazard Mater 415:125613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125613
Pietrzak D, Kania J, Kmiecik E et al (2020) Fate of selected neonicotinoid insecticides in soil–water systems: current state of the art and knowledge gaps. Chemosphere 255:126981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126981
Perez-Lucas G, Vela N, El Aatik A, Navarro S (2018) Environmental risk of groundwater pollution by pesticide leaching through the soil profile. In: Larramendy M, Sonia Soloneski S (eds) Pesticides – use and misuse and their impact in the environment. IntechOpen, pp 1–27. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.82418
Meftaul IM, Venkateswarlu K, Dharmarajan R et al (2020) Controversies over human health and ecological impacts of glyphosate: is it to be banned in modern agriculture? Environ Pollut Part A 263:114372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114372
Penn C, Gonzalez J, Williams M et al (2020) The past, present, and future of blind inlets as a surface water best management practice. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 50:743–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2019.1642836
Khalid S, Shahid M, Murtaza B et al (2020) A critical review of different factors governing the fate of pesticides in soil under biochar application. Sci Total Environ 711:134645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134645
Ren X, Zeng G, Tang L et al (2018) Sorption, transport and biodegradation – an insight into bioavailability of persistent organic pollutants in soil. Sci Total Environ 610–611:1154–1163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.089
Liu Y, Lonappan L, Kaur Brar S et al (2018) Impact of biochar amendment in agricultural soils on the sorption, desorption, and degradation of pesticides: a review. Sci Total Environ 645:60–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.099
Jarvis N (2018) Meta-analysis of pesticide sorption in subsoil. Environ Toxicol Chem 37:755–761. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.4011
Sadegh-Zadeh F, Abd Wahid S, Jalili B (2017) Sorption, degradation and leaching of pesticides in soils amended with organic matter: a review. Adv Environ Technol 3:119–132. https://doi.org/10.22104/aet.2017.1740.1100
Lewis SE, Silburn DM, Kookana RS et al (2016) Pesticide behavior, fate, and effects in the tropics: an overview of the current state of knowledge. J Agric Food Chem 64:3917–3924. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.6b01320
Agbaogun BK, Alonso JM, Buddenbaum H et al (2021) Modelling of the adsorption of urea herbicides by tropical soils with an adaptive-neural-based fuzzy inference system. J Chemom 35:3335. https://doi.org/10.1002/cem.3335
Faúndez Urbina CA, van den Berg F, van Dam JC et al (2020) Parameter sensitivity of SWAP–PEARL models for pesticide leaching in macroporous soils. Vadose Zone J 19:20075. https://doi.org/10.1002/vzj2.20075
Kuo DTF, Shih YH (2020) Meta-analysis on penconazole sorption to soils – modeling variability of KOC and nonlinear isotherm parameters. Geoderma 376:114536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114536
Marín-Benito JM, Mamy L, Carpio MJ et al (2020) Modelling herbicides mobility in amended soils: calibration and test of PRZM and MACRO. Sci Total Environ 717:137019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137019
Jaramillo M, Grischek T, Boernick H et al (2019) Evaluation of riverbank filtration in the removal of pesticides: an approximation using column experiments and contaminant transport modeling. Clean Technol Environ Pol 21:179–199. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-018-1627-y
Kupfersberger H, Klammler G, Schuhmann A et al (2018) Modeling subsurface fate of s-metolachlor and metolachlor ethane sulfonic acid in the westliches leibnitzer feld aquifer. Vadose Zone J 17:170030. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2017.01.0030
Marín-Benito JM, Sánchez-Martín MJ, Ordax JM et al (2018) Organic sorbents as barriers to decrease the mobility of herbicides in soils. Modelling of the leaching process. Geoderma 313:205–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.10.033
Paszko T, Jankowska M (2018) Modeling the effect of adsorption on the degradation rate of propiconazole in profiles of Polish Luvisols. Ecotox Environ Saf 161:584–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.05.093
Daré JK, Silva CF, Freitas MP (2017) Revealing chemophoric sites in organophosphorus insecticides through the MIA-QSPR modeling of soil sorption data. Ecotox Environ Saf 144:560–563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.06.072
Williams KL, Gladfelder JJ, Quigley LL et al (2017) Dissipation of the herbicide benzobicyclon hydrolysate in a model California rice field soil. J Agric Food Chem 65:9200–9207. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.7b03679
Arthur E, Tuller M, Moldrup P et al (2016) Evaluation of theoretical and empirical water vapor sorption isotherm models for soils. Wat Resour Res 52:190–205. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017681
Filipović V, Coquet Y, Pot V et al (2016) Modeling water and isoproturon dynamics in a heterogeneous soil profile under different urban waste compost applications. Geoderma 268:29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.01.009
Jarvis N (2016) Extended sorption partitioning models for pesticide leaching risk assessments: can we improve upon the Koc concept? Sci Total Environ 539:294–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.002
Sidoli P, Lassabatere L, Angulo-Jaramillo R et al (2016) Experimental and modeling of the unsaturated transports of S-metolachlor and its metabolites in glaciofluvial vadose zone solids. J Contam Hydrol 190:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2016.04.001
Singh B, Farenhorst A, McQueen R et al (2016) Near-infrared spectroscopy as a tool for generating sorption input parameters for pesticide fate modeling. Soil Sci Soc Am J 80:604–612. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2015.03.0118
Novotny EH, Turetta APD, Resende MF et al (2020) The quality of soil organic matter, accessed by 13C solid state nuclear magnetic resonance, is just as important as its content concerning pesticide sorption. Environ Pollut 266:115298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115298
Dionisio AC, Rath S (2016) Abamectin in soils: analytical methods, kinetics, sorption and dissipation. Chemosphere 151:17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.02.058
Dankyi E, Gordon C, Carboo D et al (2018) Sorption and degradation of neonicotinoid insecticides in tropical soils. J Environ Sci Health Part B Pest Food Contam Agric Wastes 53:587–594. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2018.1473965
Murano H, Suzuki K, Kayada S et al (2018) Influence of humic substances and iron and aluminum ions on the sorption of acetamiprid to an arable soil. Sci Total Environ 615:1478–1484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.120
Wang H, Huang Y, Shen C et al (2016) Co-transport of pesticide acetamiprid and silica nanoparticles in biochar-amended sand porous media. J Environ Qual 45:1749–1759. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2016.02.0073
Li Y, Liu X, Wu X et al (2018) Effects of biochars on the fate of acetochlor in soil and on its uptake in maize seedling. Environ Pollut 241:710–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.05.079
Park WP, Chang KM, Hyun HN et al (2020) Sorption and leaching characteristics of pesticides in volcanic ash soils of Jeju Island, Korea. Appl Biol Chem 63:71. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13765-020-00555-5
Ahmad KS (2018) Sorption and Juglans regia-derived activated carbon-mediated removal of aniline-based herbicide Alachlor from contaminated soils. Environ Earth Sci 77:437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7633-x
Ahmad KS (2018) Evaluating the adsorption potential of Alachlor and its subsequent removal from soils via activated carbon. Soil Sed Contam 27:249–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/15320383.2018.1470604
Marín-Benito JM, Herrero-Hernández E, Rodríguez-Cruz MS et al (2017) Study of processes influencing bioavailability of pesticides in wood-soil systems: effect of different factors. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 139:454–462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.02.012
Pérez-Lucas G, Vela N, Escudero JA et al (2017) Valorization of organic wastes to reduce the movement of priority substances through a semiarid soil. Water Air Soil Pollut 228:119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-017-3305-9
Portocarrero R, Aparicio V, De Gerónimo E et al (2019) Soil properties of sugarcane fields controlling triazine leaching potential. Soil Res 57:729–737. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR18342
Mendes KF, de Sousa RN, Goulart MO et al (2020) Role of raw feedstock and biochar amendments on sorption-desorption and leaching potential of three 3H- and 14C-labelled pesticides in soils. J Radioanal Nuc Chem 324:1373–1386. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-020-07128-2
Francisco JG, Mendes KF, Pimpinato RF et al (2017) Aminocyclopyrachlor sorption-desorption and leaching from three Brazilian soils. J Envion Sci Health B 52:470–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2017.1301758
Yadav S, Singh N (2021) Increased sorption of atrazine and fipronil in the sugarcane trash ash–mixed soils of northern India. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 21:1263–1276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-021-00438-8
Alister C, Araya M, Cordova A et al (2020) Humic substances and their relation to pesticide sorption in eight volcanic soils. Planta Daninha 38:020171636. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582020380100021
de Freitas SM, Langaro AC, de Jesus Passos ABR et al (2020) Adsorption mechanisms of atrazine isolated and mixed with glyphosate formulations in soil. PLoS One 15:0242350. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242350
Jing S, Lan MX, Wen W et al (2020) Adsorption characteristics of atrazine on different soils in the presence of Cd(II). Ads Sci Technol 38:225–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263617420928845
Lima JM, Aquino RF, Magalhães CAS et al (2020) Lime and phosphate effects on atrazine sorption, leaching and runoff in soil. Ciencia e Agrotecnologia 44:022919. https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-7054202044022919
Shan R, Chen Y, Meng L et al (2020) Rapid prediction of atrazine sorption in soil using visible near-infrared spectroscopy. Spectr Acta Part A Mol Biomol Spectr 224:117455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2019.117455
Yu H, Liu Y, Shu X et al (2020) Equilibrium, kinetic and thermodynamic studies on the adsorption of atrazine in soils of the water fluctuation zone in the three-gorges reservoir. Environ Sci Eur 32:27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-020-00303-y
Hüffer T, Metzelder F, Sigmund G et al (2019) Polyethylene microplastics influence the transport of organic contaminants in soil. Sci Total Environ 657:242–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.047
Huang Y, Liu Z, Wei L et al (2018) Effects of amorphous Fe oxides on adsorption-desorption of atrazine in soil. Acta Pedol Sin 55:148–158. https://doi.org/10.11766/trxb201705170220
Neuwirthová N, Bílková Z, Vašíčková J et al (2018) Concentration/time-dependent dissipation, partitioning and plant accumulation of hazardous current-used pesticides and 2-hydroxyatrazine in sand and soil. Chemosphere 203:219–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.03.177
Salazar-Ledesma M, Prado B, Zamora O et al (2018) Mobility of atrazine in soils of a wastewater irrigated maize field. Agric Ecosyst Environ 255:73–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2017.12.018
Deng H, Feng D, He JX et al (2017) Influence of biochar amendments to soil on the mobility of atrazine using sorption-desorption and soil thin-layer chromatography. Ecol Eng 99:381–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.11.021
Jaikaew P, Malhat F, Boulange J et al (2017) Aspect of the degradation and adsorption kinetics of atrazine and metolachlor in andisol soil. Hell Plant Prot J 10:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1515/hppj-2017-0001
Wang Y, Zhang X, Zhang X et al (2017) Characterization of spectral responses of dissolved organic matter (DOM) for atrazine binding during the sorption process onto black soil. Chemosphere 180:531–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.04.063
Jin J, Kang M, Sun K et al (2016) Properties of biochar-amended soils and their sorption of imidacloprid, isoproturon, and atrazine. Sci Total Environ 550:504–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.117
Ouyang W, Zhao X, Tysklind M et al (2016) Typical agricultural diffuse herbicide sorption with agricultural waste-derived biochars amended soil of high organic matter content. Water Res 92:156–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.01.055
Silva RO, Scorza Júnior RP, Bonfá MRL et al (2016) Degradation and sorption of fipronil and atrazine in Latossols with organic residues from sugarcane crop. Cienc Rural 46:1172–1177. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20150696
Tahir M, Hassan AU, Maqbool S et al (2016) Sorption and leaching potential of isoproturon and atrazine in low organic carbon soil of Pakistan under a wheat-maize rotation. Pedosphere 26:687–698. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(15)60077-7
Aldana GO, Hazlerigg C, Lopez-Capel E et al (2021) Agrochemical leaching reduction in biochar-amended tropical soils of Belize. Eur J Soil Sci 72:1243–1255. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejss.13021
Ratchawang S, Chotpantarat S (2019) The leaching potential of pesticides in Song Phi Nong district, Suphan Buri province, Thailand. Environ Asia 12:112–120. https://doi.org/10.14456/ea.2019.51
García-Jaramillo M, Trippe KM, Helmus R et al (2020) An examination of the role of biochar and biochar water-extractable substances on the sorption of ionizable herbicides in rice paddy soils. Sci Total Environ 706:135682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135682
Smalling KL, Hladik ML, Sanders CJ et al (2018) Leaching and sorption of neonicotinoid insecticides and fungicides from seed coatings. J Environ Sci Health Part B Pest Food Contam Agric Wastes 53:176–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2017.1405619
Motoki Y, Iwafune T, Seike N et al (2016) Effect of time-dependent sorption on the dissipation of water-extractable pesticides in soils. J Agric Food Chem 64:4478–4486. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.6b01028
Wu P, Wu WZ, Han ZH et al (2016) Desorption and mobilization of three strobilurin fungicides in three types of soil. Environ Monit Assess 188:363. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-016-5372-6
Ahmad KS (2018) Sorption-desorption characteristics of benzimidazole based fungicide benomyl on physicochemical properties of selected Pakistani soils and their minerals. Pak J Sci Ind Res Ser B Biol Sci 61:59–67. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85054003097&partnerID=40&md5=ed42c5f4306d8d05cec41146219ee6ee
Ponnam V, Reddy RA, Sumalatha B (2020) Sorption and desorption studies for the removal of bentazone using biochar amended soil. Ind J Ecol 47:128–131. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85093070810&partnerID=40&md5=903eec4b740b65d29a477c8530ace121
Mukherjee S, Weihermüller L, Tappe W et al (2016) Sorption-desorption behaviour of bentazone, boscalid and pyrimethanil in biochar and digestate based soil mixtures for biopurification systems. Sci Total Environ 559:63–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.145
Tauchnitz N, Kurzius F, Rupp H et al (2020) Dissipation of bentazone, pyrimethanil and boscalid in biochar and digestate based soil mixtures for biopurification systemscase study in the Querne/Weida catchment, Central Germany. Environ Pollut 267:115186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.115186
Mukherjee S, Tappe W, Weihermueller L et al (2016) Dissipation of bentazone, pyrimethanil and boscalid in biochar and digestate based soil mixtures for biopurification systems. Sci Total Environ 544:192–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.11.111
Kah M, Weniger AK, Hofmann T (2016) Impacts of (nano)formulations on the fate of an insecticide in soil and consequences for environmental exposure assessment. Environ Sci Technol 50:10960–10967. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.6b02477
Gómez S, Fernández D, Peña D et al (2019) Behaviour of bispyribac-sodium in aerobic and anaerobic rice-growing conditions with and without olive-mill waste amendment. Soil Till Res 194:104333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2019.104333
Gámiz B, Velarde P, Spokas KA et al (2017) Biochar soil additions affect herbicide fate: importance of application timing and feedstock species. J Agric Food Chem 65:3109–3117. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.7b00458
López-Piñeiro A, Sánchez-Llerena J, Peña D et al (2016) Transition from flooding to sprinkler irrigation in Mediterranean rice growing ecosystems: effect on behaviour of bispyribac sodium. Agric Ecosyst Environ 223:99–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.03.003
Pérez-Lucas G, El Aatik A, Vela N et al (2020) Exogenous organic matter as strategy to reduce pesticide leaching through the soil. Arch Agron Soil Sci 67:934–945. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2020.1768531
Holten R, Larsbo M, Jarvis N et al (2019) Leaching of five pesticides of contrasting mobility through frozen and unfrozen soil. Vadose Zone J 18:180201. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2018.11.0201
Chin-Pampillo JS, Perez-Villanueva M, Masis-Mora M et al (2021) Amendments with pyrolyzed agrowastes change bromacil and diuron’s sorption and persistence in a tropical soil without modifying their environmental risk. Sci Total Environ 772:145515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.145515
Cessna AJ, Knight JD, Ngombe D et al (2017) Effect of temperature on the dissipation of seven herbicides in a biobed matrix. Can J Soil Sci 97:717–731. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjss-2017-0017
Torabi E, Wiegert C, Guyot B et al (2020) Dissipation of S-metolachlor and butachlor in agricultural soils and responses of bacterial communities: insights from compound-specific isotope and biomolecular analyses. J Environ Sci (China) 92:163–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2020.02.009
Huang Y, Liu Z, Wei L et al (2017) Effect of soil organo-inorganic compounds different in particle size on butachlor sorption. Acta Pedol Sin 54:400–409. https://doi.org/10.11766/trxb201605130237
Abdel Ghani SB, Al-Rehiayani S, El Agamy M et al (2018) Effects of biochar amendment on sorption, dissipation, and uptake of fenamiphos and cadusafos nematicides in sandy soil. Pest Manag Sci 74:2652–2659. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5075
Kumari D, John S (2020) Sorption capacity of pesticides on soil in a predominant apple cultivation area. Soil Sed Contam 29:107–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/15320383.2019.1684876
Ćwieląg-Piasecka I, Medyńska-Juraszek A, Jerzykiewicz M et al (2018) Humic acid and biochar as specific sorbents of pesticides. J Soils Sed 18:2692–2702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-018-1976-5
Latini LA, Indaco MM, Aguiar MB et al (2018) An integrated approach for assessing the migration behavior of chlorpyrifos and carbaryl in the unsaturated soil zone. J Environ Sci Health Part B Pest Food Contam Agric Wastes 53:469–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2018.1455353
Ahmad KS (2020) Fungicidal methyl-2-benzimidazole carbamate adsorption in soil and remediation via prunus dulcis derived activated carbon. Rev Inter Contam Amb 36:429–442. https://doi.org/10.20937/RICA.53544
Tortella GR, Rubilar O, Cea M et al (2019) Sorption parameters of carbendazim and iprodione in the presence of copper nanoparticles in two different soils. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 19:469–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-019-00037-8
Ahmad KS (2019) Arachis hypogaea derived activated carbon steered remediation of Benzimidazole based fungicide adsorbed soils. Chem Ecol 35:576–591. https://doi.org/10.1080/02757540.2019.1600678
Ponnam V, Mandapati RN, Bankupalli S (2020) Irreversible sorption of carbofuran by moderately acidic soil amended with biochar. Bioint Res Appl Chem 10:5224–5228. https://doi.org/10.33263/BRIAC102.224228
Cáceres T, Maestroni B, Islam M et al (2019) Sorption of 14 C-carbofuran in Austrian soils: evaluation of fate and transport of carbofuran in temperate regions. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:986–990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3730-3
Mosquera-Vivas CS, Obregon-Neira N, Celis-Ossa RE et al (2016) Degradation and thermodynamic adsorption process of carbofuran and oxadicyl in a Colombian agricultural soil profile. Agron Colomb 34:92–100. https://doi.org/10.15446/agron.colomb.v34n1.53325
Redman ZC, Tjeerdema RS (2018) Impact of simulated California rice-growing conditions on chlorantraniliprole partitioning. J Agric Food Chem 66:1765–1772. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.7b05775
Al-Smadi BM, Al Oran EH, Abu Hajar HA (2019) Adsorption-desorption of cypermethrin and chlorfenapyr on Jordanian soils. Arab J Geosci 12:465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-4614-7
Isakovski MK, Maletić S, Tamindžija D et al (2020) Impact of hydrochar and biochar amendments on sorption and biodegradation of organophosphorus pesticides during transport through Danube alluvial sediment. J Environ Manag 274:111156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111156
Shaheen I, Ahmad KS, Zahra T (2019) Evaluating the fate of agrochemical through adsorption and desorption studies of chlorfluazuron in selected agricultural soils. J King Saud Univ Sci 31:612–617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2017.12.005
Flores-Céspedes F, Daza-Fernández I, Villafranca-Sánchez M et al (2018) Lignin and ethylcellulose in controlled release formulations to reduce leaching of chloridazon and metribuzin in light-textured soils. J Hazard Mater 343:227–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.09.012
Agbaogun BK, Fischer K (2020) Adsorption of phenylurea herbicides by tropical soils. Environ Monit Assess 192:212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-8160-2
Marín-Benito JM, Carpio MJ, Sánchez-Martín MJ et al (2019) Previous degradation study of two herbicides to simulate their fate in a sandy loam soil: effect of the temperature and the organic amendments. Sci Total Environ 653:1301–1310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.015
Suddaby LA, Beulke S, van Beinum W et al (2016) Long-term experiments to investigate irreversibility in sorption of pesticides to soil. Chemosphere 162:40–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.07.062
García-Delgado C, Marín-Benito JM, Sánchez-Martín MJ et al (2020) Organic carbon nature determines the capacity of organic amendments to adsorb pesticides in soil. J Hazard Mater 390:122162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122162
Wang Z, Yang L, Cheng P et al (2021) Adsorption, degradation and leaching migration characteristics of chlorothalonil in different soils. Eur J Rem Sens 54(S2):238–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/22797254.2020.1771216
Báez ME, Espinoza J, Silva R et al (2017) Influence of selected cyclodextrins in sorption-desorption of chlorpyrifos, chlorothalonil, diazinon, and their main degradation products on different soils. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:20908–20921. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9652-7
De Souza AJ, De Andrade PAM, De Araújo Pereira AP et al (2017) The depleted mineralization of the fungicide chlorothalonil derived from loss in soil microbial diversity. Sci Rep 7:14646. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-14803-0
Copaja SV, Gatica-Jeria P (2021) Effects of clay content in soil on pesticides sorption process. J Chil Chem Soc 65:5086–5092. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-97072021000105086
Das A, Jaswal V, Yogalakshmi KN (2020) Degradation of chlorpyrifos in soil using laccase immobilized iron oxide nanoparticles and their competent role in deterring the mobility of chlorpyrifos. Chemosphere 246:125676. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.125676
Liu H, Guan Z, Cheng J et al (2020) Effects of intermittent irrigation on reactive transport behavior of chlorpyrifos in paddy field. Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao/Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng 36:214–220. https://doi.org/10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2020.01.025
Schwantes D, Celso Gonçalves A, Jr Conradi Junior É et al (2020) Determination of chlorpyrifos by GC/ECD in water and its sorption mechanism study in a RHODIC FERRALSOL. J Environ Health Sci Eng 18:149–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-020-00448-1
Ben Salem A, Chaabane H, Caboni P et al (2019) Environmental fate of two organophosphorus insecticides in soil microcosms under Mediterranean conditions and their effect on soil microbial communities. Soil Sed Contam 28:285–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/15320383.2018.1564733
Gaonkar OD, Nambi IM, Govindarajan SK (2019) Soil organic amendments: impacts on sorption of organophosphate pesticides on an alluvial soil. J Soils Sed 19:566–578. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-018-2080-6
Aziz H, Murtaza G, Usman M et al (2018) Enhancing chlorpyrifos sorption potential of agricultural soil by biochar and compost addition. Pak J Agric Sci 55:833–841. https://doi.org/10.21162/PAKJAS/18.7463
Cederlund H, Börjesson E, Stenström J (2017) Effects of a wood-based biochar on the leaching of pesticides chlorpyrifos, diuron, glyphosate and MCPA. J Environ Manag 191:28–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.01.004
Parolo ME, Savini MC, Loewy RM (2017) Characterization of soil organic matter by FT-IR spectroscopy and its relationship with chlorpyrifos sorption. J Environ Manag 196:316–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.03.018
Savini MC, Loewy RM, Nicotra VE et al (2017) Contribution of soil components on the sorption of chlorpyrifos. Water Air Soil Pollut 228:36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-016-3153-z
Zhao Y, Wendling LA, Wang C et al (2017) Behavior of chlorpyrifos and its major metabolite TCP (3,5,6-trichloro-2-pyridinol) in agricultural soils amended with drinking water treatment residuals. J Soils Sed 17:889–900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-016-1586-z
Dores EFGC, Spadotto CA, Weber OLS et al (2016) Environmental behavior of chlorpyrifos and endosulfan in a tropical soil in central Brazil. J Agric Food Chem 64:3942–3948. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.5b04508
Papadopoulou ES, Karas PA, Nikolaki S et al (2016) Dissipation and adsorption of isoproturon, tebuconazole, chlorpyrifos and their main transformation products under laboratory and field conditions. Sci Total Environ 569–570:86–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.06.133
Vitoratos A, Fois C, Danias P et al (2016) Investigation of the soil sorption of neutral and basic pesticides. Water Air Soil Pollut 227:397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-016-3076-8
Cara IG, Rusu BG, Raus L et al (2017) Sorption potential of alkaline treated straw and a soil for sulfonylurea herbicide removal from aqueous solutions: an environmental management strategy. Chemosphere 186:360–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.07.140
Đurović-Pejčev RD, Radmanović SB, Tomić ZP et al (2020) Adsorption–desorption behaviour of clomazone in Regosol and Chernozem agricultural soils. J Serb Chem Soc 85:809–819. https://doi.org/10.2298/JSC190917122D
Fernández D, Gómez S, Albarrán Á et al (2020) How the environmental fate of clomazone in rice fields is influenced by amendment with olive-mill waste under different regimes of irrigation and tillage. Pest Manag Sci 76:1795–1803. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5705
Álvarez-Martín A, Rodríguez-Cruz MS, Andrades MS et al (2016) Application of a biosorbent to soil: a potential method for controlling water pollution by pesticides. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:9192–9203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6132-4
Álvarez-Martín A, Sánchez-Martín MJ, Ordax JM et al (2017) Leaching of two fungicides in spent mushroom substrate amended soil: influence of amendment rate, fungicide ageing and flow condition. Sci Total Environ 584–585:828–837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.126
Álvarez-Martín A, Sánchez-Martín MJ, Pose-Juan E et al (2016) Effect of different rates of spent mushroom substrate on the dissipation and bioavailability of cymoxanil and tebuconazole in an agricultural soil. Sci Total Environ 550:495–503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.151
Beringer CJ, Goyne KW, Lerch RN et al (2021) Clothianidin decomposition in Missouri wetland soils. J Environ Qual 50:241–251. https://doi.org/10.1002/jeq2.20175
Motoki Y (2020) Studies on the sorption behavior and plant uptake of pesticides in Japanese soils. J Pest Sci 16:159–165. https://doi.org/10.1584/JPESTICS.J20-05
Kah M, Walch H, Hofmann T (2018) Environmental fate of nanopesticides: durability, sorption and photodegradation of nanoformulated clothianidin. Environ Sci Nano 5:882–889. https://doi.org/10.1039/c8en00038g
Li Y, Su P, Li Y et al (2018) Adsorption-desorption and degradation of insecticides clothianidin and thiamethoxam in agricultural soils. Chemosphere 207:708–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.05.139
Motoki Y, Iwafune T, Seike N et al (2018) Comparison of soil sorption parameters of pesticides measured by batch and centrifugation methods using an andosol. J Pestic Sci 43:277–282. https://doi.org/10.1584/jpestics.D18-015
Zhang P, Ren C, Sun H et al (2018) Sorption, desorption and degradation of neonicotinoids in four agricultural soils and their effects on soil microorganisms. Sci Total Environ 615:59–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.097
Zhang P, Sun H, Ren C et al (2018) Sorption mechanisms of neonicotinoids on biochars and the impact of deashing treatments on biochar structure and neonicotinoids sorption. Environ Pollut 234:812–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2017.12.013
Kolupaeva V, Nyukhina I, Belik A (2020) Study of cyantraniliprole sorption in soils of Russia. E3S Web Conf 169:01022. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202016901022
Rodríguez-Liébana JA, Peña A (2020) Differences in the sorption kinetics of various non-ionisable pesticides in a limited number of agricultural soils from the Mediterranean basin. J Environ Manag 276:111336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111336
Yu C, Bi E (2016) Evaluating nonlinear sorption of four substituted phenols to agriculture soils using expanded polyparameter linear free energy relationship. Water Air Soil Pollut 228:414. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-017-3596-x
Ahmed SM, Taha MR, Taha OME (2018) Kinetics and isotherms of dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) adsorption using soil–zeolite mixture. Nanotechnol Environ Eng 3:4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41204-017-0033-8
Juhasz AL, Herde P, Smith E (2016) Oral relative bioavailability of dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) in contaminated soil and its prediction using in vitro strategies for exposure refinement. Environ Res 150:482–488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2016.06.039
Alfonso LF, Germán GV, María del Carmen PC et al (2017) Adsorption of organophosphorus pesticides in tropical soils: the case of karst landscape of northwestern Yucatan. Chemosphere 166:292–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.09.109
Cheng J, Lee X, Gao W et al (2017) Effect of biochar on the bioavailability of difenoconazole and microbial community composition in a pesticide-contaminated soil. Appl Soil Ecol 121:185–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsoil.2017.10.009
Svendsen SB, Carvalho PN, Bollmann UE et al (2020) A comparison of the fate of diflufenican in agricultural sandy soil and gravel used in urban areas. Sci Total Environ 715:136803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.136803
Kočárek M, Kodešová R, Sharipov U et al (2018) Effect of adjuvant on pendimethalin and dimethenamid-P behaviour in soil. J Hazard Mater 354:266–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.04.073
Rodríguez-Liébana JA, Peña A (2018) Adsorption-desorption of dimethenamid and fenarimol onto three agricultural soils as affected by treated wastewater and fresh sewage sludge-derived dissolved organic carbon. J Environ Manag 217:592–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.03.119
Carneiro GDOP, Souza MDF, Lins HA et al (2020) Herbicide mixtures affect adsorption processes in soils under sugarcane cultivation. Geoderma 379:114626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114626
Petter FA, Ferreira TS, Sinhorin AP et al (2019) Biochar increases diuron sorption and reduces the potential contamination of subsurface water with diuron in a sandy soil. Pedosphere 29:801–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(17)60434-X
Silva TS, Souza MF, Teófilo TMS et al (2019) Use of neural networks to estimate the sorption and desorption coefficients of herbicides: a case study of diuron, hexazinone, and sulfometuron-methyl in Brazil. Chemosphere 236:124333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.07.064
Spuler MJ, Briceño G, Duprat F et al (2019) Sorption kinetics of 2,4-D and diuron herbicides in a urea-fertilized Andisol. J Soil Sci Plant Nutr 19:313–320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-019-00031-0
Takeshita V, Mendes KF, Christoffoleti PJ et al (2019) Sorption-desorption isotherms of diuron alone and in a mixture in soils with different physico-chemical properties. Afr J Agric Res 14:672–679. https://doi.org/10.5897/AJAR2019.13885
Dollinger J, Dagès C, Samouelian A et al (2018) Contrasting soil property patterns between ditch bed and neighbouring field profiles evidence the need of specific approaches when assessing water and pesticide fate in farmed landscapes. Geoderma 309:50–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.09.006
Sousa GV, Pereira GAM, Teixeira MFF et al (2018) Sorption and desorption of diuron, hexazinone and mix (diuron + hexazinone) in soils with different attributes. Planta Daninha 36:018176803. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582018360100097
Dollinger J, Dagès C, Voltz M (2017) Using fluorescent dyes as proxies to study herbicide removal by sorption in buffer zones. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24:11752–11763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-8703-4
Keren Y, Borisover M, Schaumann GE et al (2017) Land disposal of olive mill wastewater enhances ability of soil to sorb diuron: temporal persistence, and the effects of soil depth and application season. Agric Ecosyst Environ 236:43–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.11.013
Borisover M, Keren Y, Usyskin A et al (2016) Effects of γ-irradiation of original and organic matter-amended soils on the sorption of triclosan and diuron from aqueous solutions. Chemosphere 152:62–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.02.091
Dollinger J, Dagès C, Negro S et al (2016) Variability of glyphosate and diuron sorption capacities of ditch beds determined using new indicator-based methods. Sci Total Environ 573:716–726. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.08.168
Regitano JB, Rocha WSD, Bonfleur EJ et al (2016) Effect of soil water content on the distribution of diuron into organomineral aggregates of highly weathered tropical soils. J Agric Food Chem 64:3935–3941. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.5b04664
Rubio-Bellido M, Morillo E, Villaverde J (2016) Effect of addition of HPBCD on diuron adsorption–desorption, transport and mineralization in soils with different properties. Geoderma 265:196–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2015.11.022
Dos Reis FC, Tornisielo VL, Pimpinato RF et al (2017) Leaching of diuron, hexazinone, and sulfometuron-methyl applied alone and in mixture in soils with contrasting textures. J Agric Food Chem 65:2645–2650. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.6b05127
Mendes KF, Inoue MH, Goulart MO et al (2016) Leaching of a mixture of hexazinone, sulfometuron-methyl, and diuron applied to soils of contrasting textures. Water Air Soil Pollut 227:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-016-2954-4
Buerge IJ, Pavlova P, Hanke I et al (2020) Degradation and sorption of the herbicides 2,4-D and quizalofop-P-ethyl and their metabolites in soils from railway tracks. Environ Sci Eur 32:150. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-020-00422-6
Spadotto CA, Locke MA, Bingner RL et al (2020) Estimating sorption of monovalent acidic herbicides at different pH levels using a single sorption coefficient. Pest Manag Sci 76:2693–2698. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5815
Babey T, Vieublé-Gonod L, Rapaport A et al (2017) Spatiotemporal simulations of 2,4-D pesticide degradation by microorganisms in 3D soil-core experiments. Ecol Model 344:48–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.11.006
Shoji R, Makino H (2017) Change in sorption of copper and 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid dimethlyamine in coexistence of calcium onto soil humic acid with different degrees of humus. Kagaku Kogaku Ronbunshu 43:358–366. https://doi.org/10.1252/kakoronbunshu.43.358
Prado B, Strozzi AG, Huerta E et al (2016) 2,4-D mobility in clay soils: impact of macrofauna abundance on soil porosity. Geoderma 279:87–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.06.007
Conkle JL, Cabrera JA, Thomas JE et al (2016) Effects of CO2 dissolution on phase distribution and degradation of dimethyl disulfide in soils under grape production. Pest Manag Sci 72:349–353. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4004
Ahmad KS (2019) Adsorption removal of endosulfan through Saccharum officinarum derived activated carbon from selected soils. J Cent South Univ 26:146–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-019-3989-7
Bošković N, Brandstatter-Scherr K, Sedlacek P et al (2020) Adsorption of epoxiconazole and tebuconazole in twenty different agricultural soils in relation to their properties. Chemosphere 261:127637. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127637
Ahmad KS (2018) Exploring the potential of Juglans regia-derived activated carbon for the removal of adsorbed fungicide Ethaboxam from soils. Environ Monit Assess 190:737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-7119-z
Cáceres T, Venkateswarlu K (2018) Sorption and mobility of 14C-fenamiphos in Brazilian soils. Environ Monit Assess 190:109. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-018-6493-x
Cryder Z, Greenberg L, Richards J et al (2019) Fiproles in urban surface runoff: understanding sources and causes of contamination. Environ Pollut 250:754–761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2019.04.060
Kchour H, Pinna MV, Nassif N et al (2020) Impact of biochar on herbicide pollution in the Litani river basin. Fresenius Environ Bull 29:11119–11128. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85099356138&partnerID=40&md5=05d88c5ff101e110c7a4556760cc5dfc
Kumari U, Singh SB, Singh N (2020) Sorption and leaching of flucetosulfuron in soil. J Environ Sci Health Part B Pest Food Contam Agric Wastes 55:550–557. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601234.2020.1733363
Aït Hammi K, Nieto-Latorre E, Ureña-Amate MD et al (2019) Effect of peat addition on sorption and leaching of triazole fungicides in Oran Soils. J Chem 2019:9019817. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/9019817
Huang B, Yan D, Wang X et al (2019) Soil fumigation alters adsorption and degradation behavior of pesticides in soil. Environ Pollut 246:264–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.12.003
Gulkowska A, Buerge IJ, Poiger T et al (2016) Time-dependent sorption of two novel fungicides in soils within a regulatory framework. Pest Manag Sci 72:2218–2230. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4256
Langaro AC, Souza MF, Pereira GAM et al (2020) Influence of glyphosate formulations on the behavior of sulfentrazone in soil in mixed applications. Toxics 8(123):1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics8040123
Albers CN, Ernstsen V, Johnsen AR (2019) Soil domain and liquid manure affect pesticide sorption in macroporous clay till. J Environ Qual 48:147–155. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2018.06.0222
Hall KE, Spokas KA, Gámiz B et al (2018) Glyphosate sorption/desorption on biochars – interactions of physical and chemical processes. Pest Manag Sci 74:1206–1212. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.4530
Cassigneul A, Benoit P, Bergheaud V et al (2016) Fate of glyphosate and degradates in cover crop residues and underlying soil: a laboratory study. Sci Total Environ 545-546:582–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.052
Kumari KGID, Moldrup P, Paradelo M et al (2016) Soil properties control glyphosate sorption in soils amended with birch wood biochar. Water Air Soil Pollut 227:174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-016-2867-2
Mendes KF, Wei MCF, Furtado IF et al (2021) Spatial distribution of sorption and desorption process of 14C-radiolabelled hexazinone and tebuthiuron in tropical soil. Chemosphere 264:128494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.128494
Chitolina GM, Mendes KF, Almeida CS et al (2020) Influence of soil depth on sorption and desorption processes of hexazinone. Planta Daninha 38:020217734. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582020380100016
Mendes KF, Sousa RN, Takeshita V et al (2019) Cow bone char as a sorbent to increase sorption and decrease mobility of hexazinone, metribuzin, and quinclorac in soil. Geoderma 343:40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.02.009
Toniêto TAP, Pierri L, Tornisielo VL et al (2016) Fate of tebuthiuron and hexazinone in green-cane harvesting system. J Agric Food Chem 64:3960–3966. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.5b04665
Maznah Z, Halimah M, Bin Sahid I et al (2016) Adsorption-desorption of hexaconazole in soils with respect to soil properties, temperature, and pH. Turkish J Agric Food Sci Technol 4:493–497. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v4i6.493-497.669
Alonso DG, de Oliveira Jr RS, Koskinen WC et al (2016) Sorption and desorption of indaziflam degradates in several agricultural soils. Sci Agric 73:169–176. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-9016-2015-0106
Gámiz B, Velarde P, Spokas KA et al (2019) Changes in sorption and bioavailability of herbicides in soil amended with fresh and aged biochar. Geoderma 337:341–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2018.09.033
Yavari S, Malakahmad A, Sapari NB et al (2016) Sorption-desorption mechanisms of imazapic and imazapyr herbicides on biochars produced from agricultural wastes. J Environ Chem Eng 4:3981–3989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2016.09.003
López-Cabeza R, Gámiz B, Cornejo J et al (2017) Behavior of the enantiomers of the herbicide imazaquin in agricultural soils under different application regimes. Geoderma 293:64–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.01.024
Castanho GM, de Toledo RA, Shim H et al (2016) Electroanalytical procedure and sorption studies for imazaquin in different soils. Int J Environ Anal Chem 96:530–541. https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2016.1172217
Satkowski LE, Goyne KW, Anderson SH et al (2018) Imidacloprid sorption and transport in cropland, grass buffer, and riparian buffer soils. Vadose Zone J 17:170139. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2017.07.0139
Castillo Diaz JM, Martin-Laurent F, Beguet J et al (2017) Fate and effect of imidacloprid on vermicompost-amended soils under dissimilar conditions: risk for soil functions, structure, and bacterial abundance. Sci Total Environ 579:1111–1119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.082
Leiva JA, Nkedi-Kizza P, Morgan KT et al (2017) Imidacloprid transport and sorption nonequilibrium in single and multilayered columns of Immokalee fine sand. PLoS One 12:0183767. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0183767
Wettstein FE, Kasteel R, Garcia Delgado MF et al (2016) Leaching of the neonicotinoids thiamethoxam and imidacloprid from sugar beet seed dressings to subsurface tile drains. J Agric Food Chem 64:6407–6415. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.6b02619
Ahmad KS (2019) Adsorption evaluation of herbicide iodosulfuron followed by cedrus deodora sawdust-derived activated carbon removal. Soil Sed Contam 28:65–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/15320383.2018.1536692
Li R, Dörfler U, Munch JC, Schroll R (2017) Enhanced degradation of isoproturon in an agricultural soil by a Sphingomonas sp. strain and a microbial consortium. Chemosphere 168:1169–1176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.10.084
Shou J, Dong H, Li J et al (2016) Influence of Al-oxide on pesticide sorption to woody biochars with different surface areas. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:19156–19163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6932-6
Peng Y, Xiao D, Yu G et al (2019) Effect of an eco-friendly o/w emulsion stabilized with amphiphilic sodium alginate derivatives on lambda-cyhalothrin adsorption–desorption on natural soil minerals. J Environ Sci (China) 78:230–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2018.09.025
Hiller E, Jurkovič L (2020) Soil sorption and degradation of Agritox herbicide formulation containing Na-K-DMA MCPA salt as an active ingredient. Acta Geologica Slovaca 12:35–42. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85097232098&partnerID=40&md5=7e9a1f63425c9ce777b6beb4f92bcbba
Cueff S, Alletto L, Bourdat-Deschamps M et al (2020) Water and pesticide transfers in undisturbed soil columns sampled from a Stagnic Luvisol and a Vermic Umbrisol both cultivated under conventional and conservation agriculture. Geoderma 377:114590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2020.114590
Mendes KF, dos Reis MR, Inoue MH et al (2016) Sorption and desorption of mesotrione alone and mixed with S-metolachlor+ terbuthylazine in Brazilian soils. Geoderma 280:22–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2016.06.014
Pose-Juan E, Marín-Benito JM, Sánchez-Martín MJ et al (2018) Dissipation of herbicides after repeated application in soils amended with green compost and sewage sludge. J Environ Manag 223:1068–1077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.07.026
Bassil J, Azzi V, Naveau A et al (2021) Influence of metalaxyl and CGA 62828 adsorption on the leaching behavior of metal-contaminated soils. Clean Soil Air Water 49:2000277. https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.202000277
Parlavecchia M, D’Orazio V, Loffredo E (2019) Wood biochars and vermicomposts from digestate modulate the extent of adsorption-desorption of the fungicide metalaxyl-m in a silty soil. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26:35924–35934. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06729-z
Gámiz B, López-Cabeza R, Facenda G et al (2016) Effect of synthetic clay and biochar addition on dissipation and enantioselectivity of tebuconazole and metalaxyl in an agricultural soil: laboratory and field experiments. Agric Ecosyst Environ 230:32–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.05.017
Gámiz B, Facenda G, Celis R (2016) Evidence for the effect of sorption enantioselectivity on the availability of chiral pesticide enantiomers in soil. Environ Pollut 213:966–973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2016.03.052
Gámiz B, Pignatello JJ, Cox L et al (2016) Environmental fate of the fungicide metalaxyl in soil amended with composted olive-mill waste and its biochar: an enantioselective study. Sci Total Environ 541:776–783. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.097
López-Cabeza R, Cornejo J, Celis R (2016) Evaluation of an organo-layered double hydroxide and two organic residues as amendments to immobilize metalaxyl enantiomers in soils: a comparative study. J Environ Manag 181:135–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.06.019
Sidoli P, Devau N, Jaramillo RA et al (2020) Reactivity of vadose-zone solids to S-metolachlor and its two main metabolites: case of a glaciofluvial aquifer. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:22865–22877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08579-6
Dollinger J, Lin CH, Udawatta RP et al (2019) Influence of agroforestry plant species on the infiltration of S-Metolachlor in buffer soils. J Contam Hydrol 225:103498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2019.103498
Cassigneul A, Benoit P, Nobile C et al (2018) Behaviour of S-metolachlor and its oxanilic and ethanesulfonic acids metabolites under fresh vs. partially decomposed cover crop mulches: a laboratory study. Sci Total Environ 631–632:1515–1524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.143
Trigo C, Spokas KA, Hall KE et al (2016) Metolachlor sorption and degradation in soil amended with fresh and aged biochars. J Agric Food Chem 64:3141–3149. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.6b00246
Marín-Benito JM, Herrero-Hernández E, Ordax JM et al (2021) The role of two organic amendments to modify the environmental fate of S-metolachlor in agricultural soils. Environ Res 195:110871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.110871
Cueff S, Alletto L, Dumény V et al (2021) Adsorption and degradation of the herbicide nicosulfuron in a stagnic Luvisol and Vermic Umbrisol cultivated under conventional or conservation agriculture. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28:15934–15946. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11772-2
Cara IG, Topa D, Calistru AE et al (2020) Agri-wastes as a low-cost adsorbent for nicosulfuron herbicide. Environ Eng Manag J 19:335–343. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85090960342&partnerID=40&md5=8ffe7745e9a00c23c883b6453918dba8
Caceres-Jensen L, Rodríguez-Becerra J, Escudey M et al (2019) Nicosulfuron sorption kinetics and sorption/desorption on volcanic ash-derived soils: proposal of sorption and transport mechanisms. J Hazard Mater 385:121576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121576
Jiang L, Yang Y, Jia LX et al (2018) Effects of earthworm casts on sorption-desorption, degradation, and bioavailability of nonylphenol in soil. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:7968–7977. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-1130-8
Xie H, Wang J, Du X et al (2017) Adsorption and leaching of paichongding a new pesticide in three typical soils. Acta Pedol Sin 54:118–127. https://doi.org/10.11766/trxb201604200104
Jiang L, Lin JL, Jia LX et al (2016) Effects of two different organic amendments addition to soil on sorption-desorption, leaching, bioavailability of penconazole and the growth of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J Environ Manag 167:130–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.10.013
Luks AK, Zegarski T, Nowak KM et al (2021) Fate of pendimethalin in soil and characterization of non-extractable residues (NER). Sci Total Environ 753:141870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141870
Kaur P, Makkar A, Kaur P et al (2018) Temperature dependent adsorption-desorption behaviour of pendimethalin in Punjab soils. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 100:167–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-017-2235-y
Smaranda C, Rosca M, Vasilachi IC et al (2020) Equilibrium studies on the sorption of organochlorine pesticide in agricultural soil. In: 8th E-health and bioengineering conference, Romania. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EHB50910.2020.9280210
Diagboya PN, Olu-Owolabi BI, Adebowale KO (2016) Distribution and interactions of pentachlorophenol in soils: the roles of soil iron oxides and organic matter. J Contam Hydrol 191:99–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2016.04.005
Olu-Owolabi BI, Diagboya PN, Okoli CP et al (2016) Sorption behaviour of pentachlorophenol in sub-Saharan tropical soils: soil types sorption dynamics. Environ Earth Sci 75:1494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-016-6307-9
Smaranda C, Bulgariu L, Rosca M et al (2016) Evaluation of pentachlorophenol leaching potential in natural soils. In: 2015 E-health bioeng conf EHB 2015. IEEE, p 7391488. https://doi.org/10.1109/EHB.2015.7391488
Khan MA, Brown CD (2017) Influence of commercial formulation on the sorption and leaching behaviour of propyzamide in soil. Sci Total Environ 578:158–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.011
Barba V, Marín-Benito JM, García-Delgado C et al (2019) Assessment of 14C-prosulfocarb dissipation mechanism in soil after amendment and its impact on the microbial community. Ecotox Environ Saf 182:109395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.109395
Barba V, Marín-Benito JM, Sánchez-Martín MJ et al (2020) Transport of 14C-prosulfocarb through soil columns under different amendment, herbicide incubation and irrigation regimes. Sci Total Environ 701:134542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134542
Gao M, Li Y, Yang H et al (2016) Sorption and desorption of pymetrozine on six Chinese soils. Front Environ Sci Eng 10:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-014-0715-4
Jiang R, Wang M, Chen W (2018) Characterization of adsorption and desorption of lawn herbicide siduron in heavy metal contaminated soils. Chemosphere 204:483–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.04.045
Cheng H, Wang J, Tu C et al (2021) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and biochar influence simazine decomposition and leaching. GCB Bioenergy 13:708–718. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12802
de Sosa LL, Glanville HC, Marshall MR et al (2018) Quantifying the contribution of riparian soils to the provision of ecosystem services. Sci Total Environ 624:807–819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.179
Lee S, Han J, Ro HM (2018) Interpreting the pH-dependent mechanism of simazine sorption to Miscanthus biochar produced at different pyrolysis temperatures for its application to soil. Korean J Chem Eng 35:1468–1476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-018-0054-4
Obregón Alvarez D, Mendes KF, Tosi M et al (2021) Sorption-desorption and biodegradation of sulfometuron-methyl and its effects on the bacterial communities in Amazonian soils amended with aged biochar. Ecotox Environ Saf 207:111222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.111222
Siek M, Paszko T (2019) Factors affecting coupled degradation and time-dependent sorption processes of tebuconazole in mineral soil profiles. Sci Total Environ 690:1035–1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.409
Raunaq A, Kumar LS, Arya S et al (2017) Adsorption-desorption of tebuconazole in three soils. Pest Res J 29:82–87
Rodríguez-Liébana JA, Mingorance MD, Peña A (2018) Thiacloprid adsorption and leaching in soil: effect of the composition of irrigation solutions. Sci Total Environ 610–611:367–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.028
Zhang P, Sun H, Min L et al (2018) Biochars change the sorption and degradation of thiacloprid in soil: insights into chemical and biological mechanisms. Environ Pollut 236:158–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2018.01.030
Li Y, Zhu Y, Liu X et al (2017) Bioavailability assessment of thiacloprid in soil as affected by biochar. Chemosphere 171:185–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.12.071
You X, Jiang H, Zhao M et al (2020) Biochar reduced Chinese chive (Allium tuberosum) uptake and dissipation of thiamethoxam in an agricultural soil. J Hazard Mater 390:121749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121749
Maznah Z, Halimah M, Ismail S (2016) Adsorption-desorption behavior of thiram: effect of soil type, temperature and pH. Chil J Agric Res 76:371–377. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0718-58392016000300016
Liu B, Chen B, Zhang J et al (2017) The environmental fate of thymol, a novel botanical pesticide, in tropical agricultural soil and water. Toxicol Environ Chem 99:223–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/02772248.2016.1198907
Ahmad KS, Amjad I, Ali D (2020) Adsorption and sugarcane-bagasse-derived activated carbon-based mitigation of 1-[2-(2-chloroethoxy)phenyl]sulfonyl-3-(4-methoxy-6-methyl-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl) urea-contaminated soils. Open Chem 18:1433–1443. https://doi.org/10.1515/chem-2020-0185
Ahmad KS (2017) Pedospheric sorption investigation of sulfonyl urea herbicide triasulfuron via regression correlation analysis in selected soils. S Afr J Chem 70:163–170. https://doi.org/10.17159/0379-4350/2017/v70a23
Peng JH, Ou XM, Ou J et al (2019) Adsorption of a new insecticide triflumezopyrim on soils. J Agro-Environ Sci 38:2371–2376. https://doi.org/10.11654/jaes.2019-0291
OECD – Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2000) OECD guidelines for the testing of chemicals. Paris: test number 106, adsorption – desorption using a batch equilibrium method. OECD, Paris, p 44
Siedt M, Schäffer A, Smith KEC et al (2021) Comparing straw, compost, and biochar regarding their suitability as agricultural soil amendments to affect soil structure, nutrient leaching, microbial communities, and the fate of pesticides. Sci Total Environ 751:141607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141607
Xu X, Schaeffer S, Sun Z et al (2020) Carbon stabilization in aggregate fractions responds to straw input levels under varied soil fertility levels. Soil Till Res 199:104593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2020.104593
Blume HP, Brümmer GW, Fleige H et al (2016) Inorganic soil components—minerals and rocks. In: Blume HP, Brümmer GW, Fleige H et al (eds) Scheffer/schachtschabe, soil science. Springer, Berlin, pp 7–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30942-7_2
Laird DA (2002) Reactions of pesticides with soil minerals. In: Dixon JB, Schulze DG (eds) Soil mineralogy with environmental applications, vol 7. Soil Science Society of America, pp 765–793. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssabookser7.c26
Cheng H, Jones DL, Hill P et al (2017) Biochar concomitantly increases simazine sorption in sandy loam soil and lowers its dissipation. Arch Agron Soil Sci 63:1082–1092. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2016.1261117
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Vagi, M.C., Petsas, A.S. (2021). Sorption/Desorption, Leaching, and Transport Behavior of Pesticides in Soils: A Review on Recent Advances and Published Scientific Research. In: Rodríguez-Cruz, M.S., Sánchez-Martín, M.J. (eds) Pesticides in Soils. The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, vol 113. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2021_803
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/698_2021_803
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-90545-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-90546-0
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)