Abstract
Pepper mild mottle virus (PMMoV), a tobamovirus of family Virgaviridae affects the quality and quantity of Capsicum. PMMoV is highly contagious, capable of transmitting through infected seeds and soil. Symptoms are more severe when crop is infected at young stage but remain unnoticed when infection takes place at maturity. Therefore, cost effective diagnostic techniques are required for timely and accurate detection of virus. In present study, coat protein encoding region of PMMoV-HP1 isolate was cloned into expression vector system, pET28a and expressed in BL21, a protease deficient strain of Escherichia coli. The PMMoV-HP1 pathotype was identified as PMMoV-P12 on the basis of coat protein amino acid sequence analysis in our previous study. The overexpression of recombinant coat protein of 26 kDa, corresponding to the expected 6X Histidine tag fused recombinant protein was purified using Ni–NTA columns from insoluble fraction. For antisera production, the purified recombinant protein was dialyzed ~ 24 h to remove urea and then used for raising polyclonal antisera. The specificity and sensitivity of antiserum obtained was demonstrated using different dilutions of antiserum for western blot assay and direct antigen coating enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (DAC-ELISA). In Western blot assay, the test antiserum reacted strongly both with PMMoV-CP in purified protein and native CP in crude sap from PMMoV infected pepper plants, whereas no reaction was observed with healthy plant sap. In DAC-ELISA antiserum dilution up to 1:1000 was capable of detecting the virus in infected sample. The absence of any cross reactivity of test antiserum was confirmed against tobacco mosaic virus, cucumber mosaic virus, tomato spotted wilt virus, pepper veinal mottle virus, potato virus Y and tomato yellow leaf curl virus antigen, known to infect capsicum.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Capsicum annuum L. var. grossum Sendt (Bell pepper or Sweet pepper), cultivated across the world under various climatic and environmental conditions [20] is an important spice and vegetable crop. Capsicum spp., originated in Mexico, South Peru and Bolivia [22, 42, 53], in India, popularly known as “Shimla Mirch” is one of the premier vegetable crops being cultivated in open as well as protected conditions. As per the records of National Horticultural Board, the total area and production of capsicum in India is 24,000 ha and 306,000 MT, respectively (http://nhb.gov.in/statistics/State_Level/2016-17(Final). The production of capsicum is being impeded by many pathogens including viruses [46] which are important contributing factor for low produce yield and poor fruit quality [21, 28]. Capsicum is known to be infected by about 68 virus species from Potyvirus, Carlavirus, Potexvirus, Tobamovirus, Tobravirus, Luteovirus, Tospovirus, Cucumovirus genera, however, 20 virus species are reported to cause considerable damage to the crop [38]. Among these, Pepper mild mottle virus (PMMoV), a member of Virgaviridae family and genus Tobamovirus, is emerging as a major threat to the Capsicum cultivation across the globe [33, 37, 45, 48].
Initially recognized as a strain of Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) by Mckinney in 1952 [36] and cited as pepper strain of TMV in early literature. Wetter et al. [58] isolated the virus from TMV resistant peppers in Sicily, Italy and named it pepper mild mottle virus. Since then, this virus and its pathotypes has been intercepted from number of capsicum growing countries that are capable of breaking L allele mediated resistance [5, 7, 17, 19, 24, 55]. The occurrence of PMMoV from India was first time encountered by Sharma and Patiyal [49] in polyhouse grown capsicum of Himachal Pradesh (HP) situated in northern part of the country and genome of this isolate was determined by Rialch et al. [45].
PMMoV is a rod shaped virus with positive sense RNA genome of ~ 6.3 kb size [45]. PMMoV causes mild to severe symptoms on capsicum which includes mosaic on leaves and fruits, mottling, puckering of leaves, vein thickening, stunting, leaf upward cupping, fruit deformations [4, 45]. The virus is highly contagious capable of being transmitted through seed [9, 18] and soil [26, 54, 59]. PMMoV may initiate the disease through infected seeds, infected soil or through contact with the infected plant or via agricultural implements thus have potential risk to cause an epidemic. Moreover PMMoV produces mild symptoms which sometimes remain unnoticed in the field and become evident only at the fruiting stage [41, 45].
Though development of virus resistant transgenic plant varieties in the recent past is one of the most effective and viable option for the management of virus diseases but these crop varieties have very low acceptance among the farmers and consumers [16, 44]. In general, use of disease free planting material and other cultural practices becomes mandatory for the control of viral diseases. Therefore accurate, rapid, specific, sensitive, economic and high-throughput techniques are required for the detection of viruses as it is the foremost important step for crop management system [1].The most common and widely used techniques for detection of plant viruses in general and PMMoV in particular includes enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) [10, 12, 27, 35, 51, 57]. However, molecular methods like RT-PCR require well equipped molecular biology laboratory, pathogen specific markers where as serological techniques are preferred methods for routine use and indexing of large sample sizes because of the comparative low cost involved [26, 52, 56]. To achieve sensitivity and specificity in serological assays, the requirement of good quality antibodies lays emphasis on the necessity of highly purified virus preparations. Hence raising of viral antigenic proteins through recombinant DNA technology provides an opportunity to get highly identical proteins to generate pure polyclonal antibodies (PAbs). The most common virus protein used in identification of most plant viruses is coat protein (CP) that build the capsid of plant viruses [8]. The viral capsid is composed of repeating subunits called capsomeres. For a given virus, the identical capsomeres have identical amino acid (aa) content and sequence but they are dissimilar for other viruses or even different strains of the virus. Therefore, use of bacterial expressed CP of plant viruses as immunogen is the novel technique to generate PAbs [39] due to the difficulties encountered during the purification of virus from infected plants and undesirable reaction in test animals due to the contamination of other virus or host proteins. Therefore present study aims at overexpression of PMMoV-HP1 (P12 pathotype) coat protein in heterologous host and its purification for the production of polyclonal antiserum for developing serology based low cost indigenous diagnostic kit.
Materials and methods
Sample collections, total RNA isolation, cDNA synthesis and RT-PCR
The PMMoV-HP1 (P12 pathotype) virus isolate [45] maintained on capsicum variety “California wonder” in greenhouse of the Department of Plant Pathology, CSK HP Agricultural. University, Palampur, India was used in this study. The total RNA was isolated from the PMMoV-HP1 infected bell pepper var. California Wonder plant using Trizol reagent following the manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen). Total RNA isolated was subjected for cDNA synthesis using Verso cDNA synthesis kit following the manufacturer’s instructions (ThermoFisher Scientific). The presence of PMMoV-HP1 in the sample was confirmed through RT-PCR using CP gene specific primers (CPF: 5′ CCAATGGCTGACAGATTACG 3′, CPR: 5′ CAACGACAA CCCTTCGATTT 3′) [45].
Construction of pET28a-CP system
cDNA synthesized from total RNA isolated of PMMoV infected plant was used to amplify CP region of virus. For overexpression, primer pair with built in restriction sites for EcoRI and SalI in forward and reverse primer respectively (F: 5′-ACGAGAATTCATGGCTTACACAGTTTCCA-3′, R: 5′-ATCGGTCGACGGAGCGGAGTTGTAGCCCAGGTGA-3′) were used. The RT-PCR was performed in 50 μl reaction containing 2 μl of cDNA template, 2 μl of each primers (10 mM), 5 μl of dNTPs mix (2 mM each), 5 μl of 10 X PCR buffer, 1.5 μl of 25 mM MgCl2 and 0.5 μl of Taq DNA polymerase (5 U/μl). The final volume was adjusted using nuclease free water. The PCR conditions consisted of initial denaturation of 94 °C for 4 min followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C for 15 s, annealing at 65 °C for 40 s and extension at 72 °C for 1 min with a final extension of 5 min at 72 °C. The PCR product was analyzed on 1.2% agraose gel stained with 2 µl of ethidium bromide (10 mg/ml) and eluted from agarose gel using gel extraction kit (GeNei) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The eluted product was ligated in pGEMT-Easy vector (Promega), and transformed into DH5α strain of E. coli. The plasmid isolated from the transformed recombinant colony was subjected to double digestion with EcoRI and SalI. For cloning into pET-28a expression vector, vector pre-digested with EcoRI and SalI was ligated to fragment with respective restriction sites and then transformed into BL21 (DE3) strain of E. coli. The positive recombinant colonies were custom sequenced (Agrigenome Labs pvt. ltd, Kerala, India) with the universal T7-promoter and terminator primers and analyzed for any frameshift.
Over expression, purification of recombinant coat protein
For expression study, the recombinant clone containing pET28a-CP was inoculated in 5 ml Luria berthani broth (LB broth) containing Kanamycin (100 mg/ml) and grown overnight at 37 °C at 170 rpm in an incubator shaker. One ml overnight grown culture was used to inoculate 500 ml of LB broth containing kanamycin and incubated at 37 °C at 200 rpm in an incubator shaker till O.D600nm reaches 0.6–0.8. The over expression of recombinant coat protein was induced using 1 mM isopropyl-thio-β-Dgalactopyranoside (IPTG) for overnight at 16 °C. The culture was centrifuged at 5000 rpm for 20 min at 4 °C and the pellet was suspended in lysis buffer B (100 mM NaH2PO4, 10 mM Tris, 8 M Urea, pH: 8.0 adjusted with NaOH). The lysate was incubated at room temperature for 20–30 min followed by centrifugation at 5000 rpm for 20 min. The pellet thus obtained was discarded and supernatant was retained. The level of induction was analyzed using this supernatant through 15% SDS-PAGE followed by gel staining with Coomassie brilliant blue 250. The expressed protein was purified using nickel–nitrilotriacetic acid (Ni–NTA) columns (Clontech) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The purity of the purified protein was assessed using SDS-PAGE.
Solubility analysis of expressed protein
To check the solubility of target protein, an experiment was conducted where two buffers viz. native buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl, 10 mM Imidazole, pH 8.0 using NaOH) and lysis buffer B (100 mM NaH2PO4, 10 mM Tris Cl, 8 M Urea, pH 8.0 using NaOH.) was used to resuspend the pellet from uninduced as well as induced culture. Both cultures were collected and pelleted down in similar way as described in the previous section. The pellet from the induced culture was resuspended in 1 ml of native buffer and incubated on ice for 20 min. To this lysate, 1 mg/ml lysozyme was added and incubated on ice for 20 min. The lysate was sonicated with 6 × 10 s with 10 s pauses at 200–300 W. The lysate was kept on ice all the time during sonication. The lysate was centrifuged at 10 000 rpm for 20 min at 4 °C. The supernatant (crude extract A, soluble protein) was taken in another tube and saved for analysis. The pellet obtained thereafter was resuspended in lysis buffer B (crude extract B). SDS-PAGE was performed as described in earlier section to analyze both A and B crude extracts.
Confirmation of 6x-His tagged recombinant protein
The production of recombinant protein was established through western blot assay. For blotting, protein samples were electrophoresed in 15% polyacrylamide gel under denaturing conditions and electroblotted on polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) (Novex, life technologies) membrane in Semi-Dry electroblotter (Peqlab) at 30 V for 3 h at room temperature. The blotted membrane was incubated overnight at 4 °C in blocking buffer (3% Bovine serum albumin, BSA) followed by incubation with 6x His-tagged Monoclonal antibody (NovagenR) (1:1000) at room temperature for 2 h with gentle shaking. Following this, the membrane was incubated with goat anti mouse IgG alkaline phosphatase (ALP) conjugated antibody (1:5000) for 2 h at room temperature. After each step the membrane was washed with 20 ml of Tris-buffer saline-Tween (TBST, 20 mM Tris–HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% (v/v) Tween-20, pH 7.2) for 3 times at least. The 5-bromo-4-chloro 3-indolyl-phosphate and nitroblue tetrazolium (BCIP/NBT) solution (Sigma, ready to use) was added to the membrane after final wash and incubated under dark conditions to visualize the reaction.
Production of polyclonal antiserum
In order to solubilize the protein in insoluble fraction, the crude extract B was subjected to incubation at room temperature with gentle shaking for 30 min followed by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 20 min. The supernatant thus obtained was subjected to affinity column chromatography using nickel–nitrilotriacetic acid (Ni–NTA) columns (Clontech). The purified protein was quantified using Qubit 2.0 flurometer, dialyzed using 50 mM Tris buffer to remove the traces of urea for more than 48 h and then used for raising custom polyclonal antisera (Genei Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. (Bangalore, India). The antiserum was raised in New Zealand white male rabbit. For primary immunization, the homogenized protein sample solution (2 mg) was mixed with 500 µl of freund’s complete adjuvant (FCA) and administered to rabbits through subcutaneous routes. Further 5 booster doses mixed with 500 µl of freund’s incomplete adjuvant (FICA) were given at 15 days interval. Blood was collected and coagulated at 37 °C for 1 h followed by centrifugation at 4000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was collected and stored at − 20 °C till further use.
Evaluation of polyclonal antiserum through western blot assay and DAC-ELISA
To evaluate the efficiency, sensitivity and specificity of obtained antiserum, western blot assay and DAC-ELISA was performed with different dilutions of antiserum. The virus was detected in purified expressed protein (346 µg/ml), PMMoV infected pepper leaves and healthy pepper leaves through western blot assay as well as DAC-ELISA. To prepare the crude extract from PMMoV infected and healthy pepper leaves, the leaves were crushed in buffer (1 g leaf tissues in 10 mL buffer) containing 0.24 g Tris, 0.80 g NaCl, 2 g Polyvinyl-pyrrolidine (PVP), 0.05% Tween 20, 20 mg KCl and NaN3 in 1000 ml distilled water (pH 7.4). The homogenized mixture was centrifuged at 4000 rpm for 20 min at 4 °C and supernatant was collected and used in western blot assay. The expressed protein along with the extract from PMMoV infected and healthy pepper leaves was electrophoresed in 15% polyacrylamide gel under denaturing conditions and electro-blotted on polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membrane. The blotted membranes were subjected to western blot assay as described in earlier section, using crude antiserum diluted in blocking buffer at 1:100, 1:500, 1:1000, 1:2000, 1:3000, 1:4000, 1:6000, 1:8000, 1:10,000 and 1:20,000 dilutions. The secondary antibody used was Goat anti-Rabbit IgG-ALP (GeNei) at 1:1000 dilution.
To perform DAC-ELISA, the sample was prepared by crushing the infected and healthy leaves in coating buffer (1 g leaf tissues in 10 mL buffer) (1.59 g Na2CO3, 2.93 g NaHCO3, 0.20 g NaN3 with 2% PVP in 1000 ml distilled water, pH- 9.6). Firstly the purified protein, extract from PMMoV infected and healthy pepper plants were coated onto the polystyrene plate and incubated at 37 °C for 2 h. The plate was blocked with 3% BSA in PBS-T buffer for 1 h at 37 °C. After the blocking step, 100 µl of crude antiserum at dilutions viz., 1:100, 1:500, 1:1000, 1:2000, 1:4000 and 1:8000 was added and incubated overnight at 4 °C. After the overnight incubation, 100 µl of Goat anti rabbit IgG conjugated with ALP enzyme (GeNei, diluted to 1:1000 times) was added to plate and incubated for 2 h at 37 °C. Three washings with PBS-T (1 × PBS buffer + 0.05% Tween-20) for five minutes was given after each step. Finally the substrate para-nitrophenyl phosphate (pNPP) (Bioreba) was added and the plates were kept for incubation at room temperature under dark conditions for one hour or till the development of color. The reaction was stopped using 50 μl of 3.0 M NaOH and absorbance at 405 nm was recorded using MULTISKAN FC ELISA reader (Thermo Scientific).
Validation of polyclonal antiserum for PMMoV detection from leaf tissues and seeds
The specificity of polyclonal antiserum was further validated by detecting PMMoV from leaf tissues of 20 artificially inoculated capsicum plants at 1:500 and 1:1000 dilutions through DAC-ELISA. The cross reactivity of the test antiserum was tested against other bell pepper viruses viz., TMV, Cucumber Mosaic Virus (CMV), Tomato Spotted wilt virus (TSWV), Pepper veinal mottle virus (PVMV), Potato virus Y (PVY) and Tomato yellow leaf curl virus (TYLCV) at 1:500 and 1:1000 dilution. For detection of the virus from seed, the seeds harvested from the fruits of artificially inoculated plants kept in butter paper bags at 4 °C were used. The antigen was prepared by grinding the 10–12 seeds (~ 55 mg) in 1 ml buffer followed by centrifugation at 5000 rpm for 5–10 min, the supernatant thus obtained was used as antigen in DAC-ELISA. The antiserum dilutions were same as described above.
Results
PCR amplification, and construction of pET28a-PMMoVCP construct
The presence of PMMoV-HP1 was confirmed through RT-PCR where an amplification of ~ 740 bp was obtained in infected samples (Fig. 1a). Further an amplicon of ~ 500 bp corresponding to PMMoV CP region using primers with built in restriction sites of EcoRI and SalI obtained in RT-PCR (Fig. 1b) was cloned into pGEM-T Easy cloning vector. Insert released after EcoRI and SalI double digestion was ligated into pET28a vector predigested with same restriction enzymes (Fig. 1c). The validity of ligation was established by colony PCR followed by DNA sequencing and NCBI-BLAST analysis of positive clones. The obtained sequence of 486 nucleotides corresponded to PMMoV-genome (Fig. 1d) at 5685–6154th nucleotide position. The BLASTn analysis confirmed the identity of sequence as PMMoV-CP with 100% similarity to the isolate PMMoV-HP1 (KJ631123.1) [45]. The obtained sequence was translated using ExPassy Translate Tool and compared with the amino acids sequence of CP gene of PMMoV-HP1 isolate (KJ631123.1). The amino acids sequence of present pET-28a-PMMoVCP was 100% similar to PMMoV-HP1 isolate (Fig. 2). Thus these results confirmed the successful insertion of full length PMMoV-CP gene in pET-28a expression vector without any frameshift.
Overexpression, solubility and purification of recombinant protein
The induction of recombinant CP was confirmed using 15% SDS-PAGE where 1 mM IPTG was able to induce the overexpression of protein. Induced protein of ~ 26 kDa corresponding to predicted size was observed in SDS-PAGE whereas absence of same in the uninduced culture confirmed its overexpression (Fig. 3a). SDS-PAGE after protein purification through Ni–NTA affinity chromatography also revealed a single band of ~ 26 kDa molecular weight in the elution fraction. To check the localization of target protein, buffers viz., native buffer and lysis buffer B were used to suspend the pellet. Both A and B crude extracts were analyzed through SDS-PAGE (Fig. 3b). The SDS-PAGE analysis showed the presence of expressed target protein in the insoluble fraction. The recombinant protein expression was also established through western blot assay using 6x His-tag monoclonal antibody as primary antibody and goat anti mouse IgG ALP conjugated antibody. The presence of single band corresponding to molecular weight i.e. 26 kDa confirmed the overexpression of 6X His tagged protein in BL21 strain of E. coli (Fig. 3c).
Evaluation and validation of raised polyclonal antiserum
A total of 2.0 mg purified 6X-His tagged recombinant protein (346 µg/ml) quantified through Qubit 2.0 flurometer was used to immunize rabbit for production of polyclonal antiserum using custom services. The polyclonal antiserum thus obtained was subjected to western blot assay and DAC-ELISA for evaluating its specificity and sensitivity against the PMMoV using purified expressed protein sample; PMMoV infected plants with different dilutions of the antiserum. In western blot assay, the raised PMMoV antiserum reacted with PMMoV-CP in purified protein sample as well as crude sap extracted from PMMoV infected plants (Fig. 3d). The molecular weight of CP band observed in case of overexpressed protein and infected plant’s crude sap was ~ 26 kDa and ~ 17 kDa, respectively. The molecular weight of PMMoV CP is 17.2 kDa and protein band of same size was obtained in case of infected plant’s crude sap though a significant difference in protein size was obtained in case of overexpressed protein and infected plant’s crude sap due to lack of tag at C and N terminal of the native protein. The antiserum could detect the viral CP in purified protein sample up to 1:10,000 dilution; while in crude sap antiserum dilution of 1:8000 was able to detect the viral CP. No reaction was observed in case of total protein isolated from healthy pepper leaves. The antiserum did not show any non-specific reaction with infected plant tissues and purified virus.
In DAC-ELISA, the antiserum dilutions of 1:100, 1:500 and 1:1000 were able to detect the antigen in infected samples. The absorbance value at 405 nm of PMMoV infected plants ranged from 1.372 to 0.122 while in case of purified virus the values ranged from 2.610 to 0.901. The absorbance values for healthy samples remained lower than 0.340 at all dilutions used (Table 1). However, the absorbance values for purified protein were higher than the crude sap from PMMoV infected leaves at all the tested dilutions. The antiserum detected PMMoV in all the artificially inoculated capsicum plants but showed negative reaction with other pepper viruses (Table 2). Additionally, both the antiserum dilutions has also successfully detected PMMoV from seeds exhibiting OD405 values much higher than the negative control and were at par with that of commercial antibodies (Table 2).
Discussion
PMMoV is a serious viral disease that considerably affects the quality and quantity of capsicum production [4, 13, 34] and causes severe symptoms when infection takes place at young stage of crop [41]. Since 1984, the virus has been reported from different parts of capsicum growing areas of the world including India and Pakistan [3, 49], therefore the virus is distributed worldwide [33]. The symptoms produced by PMMoV sometimes remain unnoticed in the field till the fruit development [41] thus timely and accurate detection of the virus in field leads to the successful formulation of management strategies. Among various detection methods employed for plant virus disease diagnosis, ELISA has been the method of choice across the globe due to simplicity of the protocol, effectiveness and availability of the commercial kits for routine screening of large number of samples [40, 60].
The existence of 3 pathotypes viz., P12, P123 and P1234 has been reported to infect capsicum in different parts of the world. Rialch et al. [45] determined the full genome sequence of PMMoV-HP1 and identified its pathotype P12 on the basis of amino acid sequence of CP from India. In the present study, the CP of the PMMoV-HP1 (P12) was successfully amplified using RT-PCR and cloned into an expression vector, and polyclonal antiserum was raised against the expressed CP. Since CP is the most relevant viral protein used in immunodiagnostic detection procedures [15], thus this strategy has been used to produce antibodies against different plant viruses which are unstable or difficult to purify from infected host plant in sufficient quantity [23, 25, 29,30,31, 50]. The use of bacterially expressed protein as immunogen is preferred over the purified virus preparations from infected hosts. In some host plants the purification becomes difficult due to low yield of virion particles thus requires large quantity of infected tissue and may results in non-specific reaction because of mixed infection or host protein contamination [11]. Capsicum spp. is reported to being infected by 7 Tobamovirus species viz., TMV, Tomato mosaic virus (ToMV), Tobacco mild green mosaic virus (TMGMV), Bell pepper mottle virus (BPeMV), Paprika mild mottle virus (PaMMV), Obuda pepper virus (ObPV) and PMMoV [28]. Thus purified virus preparation from such hosts harboring multiple infections like Capsicum spp. may possess contamination of host proteins as well as different tobamoviruses which are difficult to distinguish on the basis of symptoms and virus morphology. With the advancement in virus research, now it has become possible to express the recombinant CP in bacterium and use as an antigen which is the best alternative route instead of purification directly from plant cells. The immunogen prepared through recombinant DNA technology remains free from any form of contamination thus provides pure antigen for antibody production [14]. The polyclonal antiserum generated through this method is comparatively more specific and sensitive as compared to those raised against purified virus particles [6].
In the current study, the PMMoV-CP was first cloned in pGEM-T easy cloning vector (Promega) and then subcloned in expression vector, pET-28a, to eliminate the instability of the plasmid due to the production of proteins potentially toxic to host cells [47]. The major protein band observed in the induced culture had higher molecular weight (~ 26 kDa) than that of observed in case of crude plant sap (17 kDa) because of the presence of 60 amino acids from the expression vector used including 6 Histidine amino acid residues at N-terminus. The solubility of the protein rely on the characteristics of the protein to be expressed (proteins with cysteine residue, improper formation of disulphide bond), nature of the host, the rate/level of expression (high or low), applied temperature and media composition [43]. In present study, the overexpression was induced by incubating the cells overnight at 16 °C which led to high level of expression which might have resulted in formation of insoluble aggregates in E. coli; known as inclusion bodies.
As the recombinant protein had 6X Histidine tag at N-terminus, Ni–NTA columns were used to purify the target protein as histidine strongly binds to the immobilized Ni2+-NTA matrices. The 6X Histidine residues have no immunogenic properties, thus tags were not removed from the purified target protein before injecting into the animal. The polyclonal antiserum raised in New Zealand White male rabbit was analyzed for its specificity and sensitivity to PMMoV through Western blot assay and DAC-ELISA.
The evaluation of raised antiserum through western blot assay and DAC-ELISA successfully detected PMMoV without any non-specific reaction. In the current study, almost at all the antiserum dilutions, a positive reaction was observed in case of purified protein sample as well as crude extract of PMMoV infected leaves in western blot assay. This confirmed that the antiserum raised was capable of detecting native CP from total proteins extracted from pepper plants infected with PMMoV and did not react with the plant proteins. There was a considerable difference in the molecular mass of the CP band observed in both cases as the CP in the purified expressed protein sample was fused with tags. The molecular mass of the band observed in case of infected plant tissue were of ~ 17 kDa which is the molecular weight of PMMoV-CP. In DAC-ELISA dilution up to 1:1000 was able to clearly differentiate the infected samples from the healthy ones, while at dilution 1:8000 the absorbance value of both PMMoV infected and healthy sample were at par. So far, only two reports exists in the literature on production of antiserum against PMMoV using purified virus preparation [2] and expressed recombinant CP [32] as immunogen from Saudi Arabia and China, respectively. Afaf et al. [2] used the purified virus from infected plants as antigen and performed Tissue blot immuno binding assay (TBIA) and Dot blot immuno binding assay (DBIA) to evaluate the efficiency of antiserum. The virus titre observed by Afaf et al. [2] was 1/1024. The single purification protocol cannot be applied for different viruses, apparently similar viruses, or even different strains of a virus. Moreover, virus purification is more of an art than science. Additionally, to get more specific antiserum it is always recommended to use bacterially expressed viral gene which gives more consistent results due to its purity. The maximum titre of antiserum developed by Kun et al. [32] exhibiting positive reaction with antigen obtained from infected leaf tissue in Indirect-ELISA was 1:4000 which is 4 times higher than observed in our study, though the rate of positive samples was 38 per cent. Whereas in the present study, the rate of positive samples observed through DAC-ELISA was 100 per cent as all the samples from artificially inoculated plants tested positive using the antisera raised in the present study.
This is the first report of prokaryotic expression of PMMoV-CP (P12) in pET-28a expression vector and production of polyclonal antiserum against CP of PMMoV-HP1, identified as P12 pathotype from India.
The specificity, sensibility and reproducibility of polyclonal antibodies raised in present study clearly indicate the utility of antibodies raised against CP region of PMMoV-HP1. Moreover the cross reactivity of antibodies raised against P12 pathotype need to be checked against other PMMoV strains, though we have not so far recorded the presence of P1, P123 and P1234 pathotypes in our state. Further, the polyclonal antibodies developed in present study can be used for developing indigenous and low cost rapid immune-diagnostic strip which can be employed for detecting PMMoV infection in field itself without requiring any high cost instruments and expertise.
References
Aboul-Ata AE, Mazyad H, El-Attar AK, Soliman AM, et al. Diagnosis and control of cereal viruses in the Middle East. Adv Virus Res. 2011;81:33–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-385885-6.00007-9.
Afaf SAW, Khattab Eman AH, Azza GF. Purification and production of antiserum against Pepper mild mottle virus isolated from Saudi Arabia. Res J Biotechnol. 2017;12:14–9.
Ahmad A, Tiberini A, Ashfaq M, Tomassoli L. First report of Pepper mild mottle virus infecting chilli pepper in Pakistan. New Dis Rep. 2015;32:31.
Alonso E, Garcia-Luque I, Avila-Rincon MJ, Wickc B, et al. A tobamovirus causing heavy losses in protected pepper crops in Spain. J Phytopathol. 1989;125:67–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0434.1989.tb01057.x.
Antignus Y, Lachman O, Pearlsman M, Maslenin L, Rosner A. A new pathotype of Pepper mild mottle virus (PMMoV) overcomes the L4 resistance genotype of pepper cultivars. Plant Dis. 2008;92:1033–7. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS-92-7-1033.
Aseel DG, Hafez EE. The comparison of antibodies raised against PLRV with two different approaches—viral particles purification and recombinant production of CP. J Plant Pathol Microbiol. 2017. https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7471.1000407.
Berzal-Herranz A, Cruz A, Tenllado F, Diaz-Ruiz JR, et al. The capsicum L3 gene mediated resistance against the tobamoviruses is elicited by the coat protein. Virology. 1995;209:498–505. https://doi.org/10.1006/viro.1995.1282.
Biswas K, Tarafdar A, Kumar R (2016). Detection of plant viruses for their management: recent trends. In Barman A (ed) Plant Pathogen Interaction: Recent Trends, Sharma Publications & Distributors, India, pp 77-92.
Brunt AA, Crabtree K, Dallwitz MJ, Gibbs AJ, Watson L. Viruses of plants: descriptions and lists from the vide database. Cambridge: Cab International, University Press; 1996.
Caglar BK, Fdan H, Elbeaino T. Detection and molecular characterization of Pepper mild mottle virus from Turkey. J Phytopathol. 2013;161(6):434–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/jph.12068.
Carvalho S, Silva FN, Zanardo LG, Almeida AMR, et al. Production of polyclonal antiserum against Cowpea mild mottle virus coat protein and its application in virus detection. Trop Plant Pathol. 2013;38(1):49–54. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1982-56762013000100007.
Choi SK, Choi GS, Kwon SJ, Yoon JY. Complete nucleotide sequences and genome organization of two pepper mild mottle virus isolates from Capsicum annum in South Korea. Genome Announc. 2016;4:411–6. https://doi.org/10.1128/2FgenomeA.00411-16.
Conti M, Marte M. Virus, Virosi E Microplasmosi Del Peperone. L’Italia Agricola, Ramo Editoriale degli Agricultori Roma. 1983;120:132–52.
Dewey M, Evans D, Coleman J, Priestley R, et al. Antibodies in plant science. Acta Bot Neerl. 1991;40(1):1–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.1991.tb01510.x.
Engel EA, Girardi C, Escobar PF, Arredondo V, et al. Genome analysis and detection of a Chilean isolate of Grapevine leafroll associated virus-3. Virus Gene. 2008;37:110–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11262-008-0241-1.
Fuchs M, Gonsalves D. Safety of virus-resistant transgenic plants two decades after their introduction: lessons from realistic field risk assessment studies. Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2007;45:173–202. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.phyto.45.062806.094434.
Garcia-Luque I, Ferrero ML, Rodriguez JM, Alonso E, et al. The nucleotide sequence of the coat protein genes and 3′ non coding regions of two resistance-breaking tobamoviruses in pepper shows that they are different viruses. Arch Virol. 1993;131:75–88.
Genda Y, Sato GK, Nunomura O, Lirabayashi T, et al. Immunolocalization of Pepper mild mottle virus in Capsicum annuum seeds. J Gen Plant Pathol. 2005;71:238–42. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10327-005-0189-0.
Genda Y, Kanda A, Hamada H, Sato K, et al. Two amino acid substitutions in the coat protein of Pepper mild mottle virus are responsible for overcoming the L4 gene-mediated resistance in Capsicum spp. Phytopathology. 2007;97:787–93. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHYTO-97-7-0787.
Gonzalez-Zamora A, Sierra-Campos E, Luna-Ortega JG, Perez-Morales R, et al. Characterization of different capsicum varieties by evaluation of their capsaicinoids content by high performance liquid chromatography, determination of pungency and effect of high temperature. Molecules. 2013;18:13471–86. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules181113471.
Green SK, Wu SF. Tobamoviruses on Capsicum annuum in Taiwan. Plant Dis. 1991;75(11):1186.
Greenleaf WH. Pepper breeding. In: Bassett MJ, editor. Breeding vegetable crops. USA: AVI Publishing Cooperation; 1986. p. 69–127.
Gulati-Sakhujaa A, Searsa JL, Nunezb A, Liu HY. Production of polyclonal antibodies against Pelargonium zonate spot virus coat protein expressed in Escherichia coli and application for immunodiagnosis. J Virol Methods. 2009;160:29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviromet.2009.04.005.
Hamada H, Takeuchi S, Kiba A, Tsuda S, et al. Amino acid changes in Pepper mild mottle virus coat protein that affect L3 gene-mediated resistance in pepper. J Gen Plant Pathol. 2002;68:155–62.
Hourani H, Abou-Jawdah Y. Immunodiagnosis of cucurbit yellow stunting disorder virus using polyclonal antibodies developed against Recombinant coat protein. J Plant Pathol. 2003;85(3):197–204.
Ikegashira Y, Ohki T, Ichiki UT, Higashi T, et al. An immunological system for the detection of Pepper mild mottle virus in soil from green pepper fields. Plant Dis. 2004. https://doi.org/10.1094/PDIS.2004.88.6.650.
Jeong J, Ju HJ, Noh J. A review of detection methods for the plant viruses. Res Plant Dis. 2014;20(3):173–81. https://doi.org/10.5423/RPD.2014.20.3.173.
Kenyon L, Kumar S, Tsai WS, Hughes JA. Virus diseases of peppers (Capsicum spp.) and their control. In: Loebenstein G, Katis N, editors. Adv virus res. Burlington: Academic Press; 2014. p. 297–354.
Komorowska B, Malinowski T. The attempts to produce antiserum against Apple stem pitting virus coat protein (ASPV Cp) obtained in prokaryotic and Eukaryotic expression systems. J Fruit Ornam Plant Res. 2009;17(2):21–30.
Koolivand D, Bashir NS, Rostami A. Preparation of polyclonal antibody against recombinant coat protein of Cucumber mosaic virus isolate B13. J Crop Prot. 2017;6(1):25–34. https://doi.org/10.18869/modares.jcp.6.1.25.
Kumar PV, Sharma SK, Rishi N, Baranwal VK. Efficient immunodiagnosis of Citrus yellow mosaic virus using polyclonal antibodies with an expressed recombinant virion-associated protein. 3 Biotech. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-017-1063-4.
Kun H, Xing-hua Z, Yu-ke L. Prokaryotic expression and antiserum preparation of the coat protein of Pepper mild mottle virus. Acta Phytopathol Sin. 2017;47:560–98. https://doi.org/10.13926/j.cnki.apps.000108.
Lamb EM, Adkins S, Shuler KD, Robert PD (2001) Pepper mild mottle virus. Institute of food and Agricultural Sciences. University of Florida. IFAS Extension Bulletin, pp 808-809.
Marte M, Wetter C. Occurrence of Pepper mild mottle virus in pepper cultivars from Italy and Spain. ZeitschriftFürPflanzenkrankheitenundpflan-zenschutz. 1986;93:37–43.
Martinez-Ochoa N, Langston DB, Mullis SW, Flanders JT. First report of Pepper mild mottle virus in Jalapeno pepper in Georgia. Plant Health Prog. 2003. https://doi.org/10.1094/PHP-2003-1223-01-HN.
Mckinney HH. Two strains of Tobacco mosaic virus, one of which is seed-borne in an etch-immune pungent pepper. Plant Dis Report. 1952;36:184–7.
Milosevic D, Stankovic I, Bulajic A, Ignjatov M, et al. Detection and molecular characterization of Pepper mild mottle virus in Serbia. Genetika. 2015;47(2):651–63. https://doi.org/10.2298/GENSR1502651M.
Moury B, Verdin E. Viruses of pepper crops in the Mediterranean Basin: a remarkable stasis. Adv Virus Res. 2012;84:127–62.
Narayanasamy P. Immunology in plant health and its impact on food safety. New York: The Haworth Press; 2005.
Nascimento AKQ, Lima JAA, Barbosa GS. A simple kit of plate-trapped antigen enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for identification of plant viruses. Rev Cienc Agron. 2017;48(1):216–20. https://doi.org/10.5935/1806-6690.20170025.
Petrov N. Effect of pepper mild mottle virus infection on pepper and tomato plants. Plant Stud. 2014;4(6):61–4.
Pickersgill B, Heiser CBJ, McNeill J (1979) Numerical taxonomic studies on variation and domestication in some species of Capsicum. In Hawkes JG, Lester RN, Skelding AD (eds) The Biology and Taxonomy of the Solanaceae. Linnean Society Symposium Series No. 7. London and New York: Academic Press, pp 679–700
Primrose SB, Twyman R (2006) Principles of gene manipulation and genomics. Wiley-Blackwell.
Prins M, Laimer M, Noris E, Schubert J, et al. Strategies for antiviral resistance in transgenic plants. Mol Plant Pathol. 2008;9(1):73–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1364-3703.2007.00447.x.
Rialch N, Sharma V, Sharma A, Sharma PN. Characterization and complete nucleotide sequencing of Pepper mild mottle virus infecting bell pepper in India. Phytoparasitica. 2015;43:327–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-015-0453-6.
Roberts PD, Adkins S, Pernezny K, Jones JB. Diseases of pepper and their management. In: Naqvi SAMH, editor. Diseases of fruits and vegetables, vol. II. Dordrecht: Springer; 2004. p. 333–87.
Rosano GL, Ceccarell EA. Recombinant protein expression in Escherichia coli: advances and challenges. Front Microbiol. 2014. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00172.
Secrist K, Ali A. First complete genome sequence of Pepper mild mottle virus from chili pepper in the United States. Genome Announc. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.00331-18.
Sharma PN, Patiyal K. Status of viruses infecting sweet pepper under polyhouse cultivation in Himachal Pradesh. Pl Dis Res. 2011;26:185.
Sherpa AR, Hallan V, Zaidi AA. In vitro expression and production of antibody against cymbidium mosaic virus coat protein. Indian J Virol. 2012;23(1):46–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13337-012-0069-0.
Sidaros SA, El-Kewey SA, Amin HA, Khatab EAH, et al. Cloning and sequencing of a cDNA encoding the coat protein of an Egyptian isolate of Pepper mild mottle virus. Int J Virol. 2009;5:109–18. https://doi.org/10.3923/ijv.2009.109.118.
Souiri A, Zemzami M, Amzazi S, Ennaji MM. Polyclonal and monoclonal antibody-based methods for detection of plant viruses. Eur J Sci Res. 2014;123(3):281–95.
Sreedhara DS, Kerutagi MG, Basavaraja H, Kunnal LB, et al. Economics of capsicum production under protected conditions in Northern Karnataka. Karnataka J Agric Sci. 2013;26(2):217–9.
Tan SH, Nishiguchi M, Sakamoto W, Ogura Y, et al. Molecular analysis of the genome of an attenuated strain of cucumber green mottle mosaic virus. Ann Phytopathol Soc Jpn. 1997;63:470–4.
Tsuda S, Kirita M, Watanabe Y. Characterization of Pepper mild mottle tobamovirus strain capable of overcoming the L3 gene-mediated resistance, distinct from the resistance-breaking Italian isolate. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 1998;11:327–31. https://doi.org/10.1094/MPMI.1998.11.4.327.
Vemulapati B, Druffel KL, Husebye D, Eigenbrode SD, Pappu HR. Development and application of ELISA assays for the detection of two members of the family Luteoviridae infecting legumes: pea enation mosaic virus (genus Enamovirus) and Bean leafroll virus (genus Luteovirus). Ann Appl Biol. 2014;165:130–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12126.
Wen Z, Liu Z, Zhang L, Liu Q, et al. Identification of viruses infecting Capsicum annuum L. in Hexi Area of Gansu Province. China Vegetables. 2010;16:74–8.
Wetter C, Conti M, Altschuh D, Tabillion R, Regenmortel MHV. Pepper mild mottle virus, a Tobamovirus infecting pepper cultivar in Sicily. Am Phytopathol Soc. 1984;74:405–10.
Yoshimoto R, Sasaki H, Takahashi T, Kanno H, Nanzyo M. Contribution of soil components to adsorption of Pepper mild mottle virus by Japanese soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 2012;46:96–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.12.006.
Zimmermann D, Bass P, Legin R, Walter B. Characterization and serological detection of four closterovirus like particles associated with leafroll disease on grapevine. J Phytopathol. 1990;130:205–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0434.1990.tb01169.x.
Acknowledgements
The corresponding author is grateful to the University Grant Commission, New Delhi, India, for providing the funds (Award Letter No. 43-3/2014-SR) to carry out the present research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
There is no conflict of interest among the authors.
Human and animals rights
The antiserum was produced in rabbits through custom hiring services from Genei Laboratories Pvt. Ltd. (Bangalore, India). All applicable national, and/or institutional guidelines for the care and use of animals were followed.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kumari, N., Sharma, V., Patel, P. et al. Heterologous expression of pepper mild mottle virus coat protein encoding region and its application in immuno-diagnostics. VirusDis. 31, 323–332 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13337-020-00597-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13337-020-00597-9