Introduction

Among the established imaging techniques, fluorescence microscopy offers unique advantages for biophysical studies at the molecular level, for example, to analyze the folding and function of individual biomolecules (Nienhaus 2009; Helm et al. 2009) and to visualize biomolecular processes in living cells with high spatial resolution (Hedde and Nienhaus 2010). The quality of fluorescence imaging crucially relies on the performance of the fluorophores attached to the biological structures of interest to visualize them, so many researchers keep on pursuing new, robust fluorescence probes (Zhang et al. 2002; Koo et al. 2011). Ideally, fluorescence probes suitable for imaging applications should meet the following requirements: (1) they should be non-toxic to cells and other organisms; (2) they should be smaller than the biomolecules of interest, so that normal biological functions such as biomolecular interactions are not disturbed; (3) they should have optimal photophysical properties including low photobleaching, absence of blinking, and high quantum yield; and, finally, (4) they should be simple to synthesize and use for labeling biomolecules. Each of these attributes is essential for marker application in advanced imaging techniques aimed at unraveling the molecular details underlying biological processes (Fernandez-Suarez and Ting 2008).

Organic dyes have been employed as powerful and bright fluorescence markers for many years (Giepmans et al. 2006; Fernandez-Suarez and Ting 2008). However, their limited photostability and small Stokes shift restrict their use in some applications, e.g., long-term tracking and multicolor imaging applications (Resch-Genger et al. 2008). GFP-like fluorescent proteins are even less photostable than excellent organic dyes, but their key advantage for biological imaging applications is that they can be genetically encoded so that the labels are produced by the cells themselves (Wiedenmann and Nienhaus 2006; Nienhaus 2008; Nienhaus and Wiedenmann 2009). In contrast, semiconductor quantum dots have excellent brightness and photostability and are, from the photophysics point of view, very attractive labels for biological imaging (Michalet et al. 2005). Due to bulky layers for water solubilization and biofunctionalization, many currently available quantum dots have an overall diameter above 5 nm, potentially causing major kinetic or steric hindrance problems when utilized as fluorescent biomarkers for studying biomolecule interactions or tracking biological processes (Baker 2010).

In recent years, novel fluorescent biomarkers have been developed based on metal nanocrystals, known as fluorescent metal nanoclusters (NCs) (Zheng et al. 2007; Shang et al. 2011c). Metal NCs consist of a few atoms and have a core diameter of less than 2 nm. With cluster dimensions approaching the Fermi wavelength of electrons, the continuous density of states breaks up into discrete energy levels leading to the observation of dramatically different optical, electrical, and chemical properties as compared to large metal nanoparticles (Zheng et al. 2004) and, most importantly, they can exhibit strong photoluminescence. Although these luminescent metal NCs have not yet found as widespread application as conventional organic dyes, they show great promise as markers for biological imaging due to their ultrasmall size and excellent photophysical property. Among various metal NCs (e.g., Au, Ag, Cu, and Pt), AuNCs are currently most intensely studied, owing to their good biocompatibility, extraordinary stability, and facile synthesis (Muhammed and Pradeep 2010). In this review, we focus on recent developments in utilizing AuNCs as novel optical probes for fluorescence bioimaging.

Optical properties and synthesis of gold nanoclusters

The ultra-small size of AuNCs results in quantum confinement effects, which give rise to discrete electronic energy levels, molecule-like electronic transitions, enhanced photoluminescence, intrinsic magnetism, and other effects (Jin 2010). In contrast to larger Au nanoparticles, AuNCs are too small to possess the continuous density of states necessary to support a plasmon. While the photoluminescence from bulk gold is extremely low, with a quantum yield of only 10−10 (Mooradian 1969), AuNCs can have a much enhanced quantum yield in the range 10−3–10−1. Therefore, they can be sufficiently bright for many fluorescence marker applications. The as yet highest reported quantum yield of AuNCs was 70 % for dendrimer-encapsulated Au5 NCs by the Dickson group (Zheng et al. 2004). By controlling size and chemical composition, the fluorescence emission of AuNCs can be easily tuned from the visible into the near-infrared region (Zheng et al. 2004; Huang et al. 2009b).

With regard to their nonlinear optical properties, Ramakrishna et al. ((2008) demonstrated that AuNCs can be used as efficient two-photon absorbers. The two-photon absorption cross-section of AuNCs was measured to be as high as 105 Göppert-Mayer units (Polavarapu et al. 2011), higher than the values reported for typical organic dyes and quantum dots (Larson et al. 2003; Pan et al. 2007a; Feng et al. 2008). Such large two-photon absorption cross-sections make AuNCs efficient absorbers for multi-photon biological imaging. Furthermore, AuNCs have been observed to possess better photostability than organic dyes (Polavarapu et al. 2011; Wu et al. 2010; Lin et al. 2009). For instance, lipoic acid-coated AuNCs exhibited a much slower photobleaching rate than organic fluorophores such as fluorescein and rhodamine 6G (Lin et al. 2009). The photophysical merits of AuNCs mentioned above are beneficial to their biological application, giving the possibility of multiplexed detection of molecular targets, and continuous, real-time imaging of single molecules or cells over long periods.

The reliable synthesis of AuNCs with excellent optical properties is a fundamental requirement for their application. A wide variety of methods for the synthesis of water-soluble, fluorescent AuNCs have been described. These fall into two main categories. The first route involves the production of small clusters from large Au nanoparticles by etching with thiols (Huang et al. 2007; Lin et al. 2009; Muhammed et al. 2009), biomolecules (Zhou et al. 2009; Muhammed et al. 2010), or multivalent polymers (Duan and Nie 2007). Although this strategy proved to be efficient for synthesizing AuNCs with different ligands, it involves a multi-step process that makes their synthesis rather complicated and tedious. By contrast, a one-step strategy, in which fluorescent AuNCs are produced directly by reducing gold salt with a suitable reductant such as sodium borohydride (Link et al. 2002; Schaeffer et al. 2008; Shang et al. 2011a), tetrakis(hydroxymethyl)phosphonium chloride (Shang et al. 2011b), or even proteins (Xie et al. 2009; Xavier et al. 2010; Wen et al. 2011; Yan et al. 2012), is more favorable and has lately been widely adopted.

Fluorescence imaging of gold nanoclusters in vitro

With the rapid advance of synthesis strategies, AuNCs have been successfully employed as fluorescence labels for a variety of biological purposes, such as biomolecule detection (Huang et al. 2009a; Shiang et al. 2011; Jin et al. 2011; Tian et al. 2012), intracellular metal ion sensing (Pu et al. 2011; Shang et al. 2012b), live cell labeling (Lin et al. 2009; Huang et al. 2011; Liu et al. 2011), cellular apoptosis studies (Lin et al. 2010), and targeting notorious pathogenic bacteria (Chen et al. 2010). Among the various applications of AuNCs, fluorescence imaging has made the most progress and attracted the greatest interest. In an early report, Lin et al. (2008) explored the possibility of utilizing AuNCs as fluorescence probes for nuclear targeting and intracellular imaging. Confocal microscopy images failed to show fluorescence from cells treated with 11-mercaptoundecanonic acid-capped AuNCs, suggesting a low cellular uptake efficiency for these nanoparticles (Fig. 1a). By contrast, upon functionalization of AuNCs with a site-specific targeting peptide, denoted SV40 nuclear-localization signal, intense blue PL from AuNCs was observed inside the cells (Fig. 1c, e). Colocalization experiments revealed that these peptide-coated AuNCs were distributed within both the cytoplasm (Fig. 1d) and the nucleus (Fig. 1f). Jao et al. (2010) further reported that positively charged, dendrimer-encapsulated Au8 NCs could penetrate the cell membrane and predominantly localized in the cytoplasm. Moreover, recent studies revealed that AuNCs also enter cells via endocytosis (Iversen et al. 2011; Polavarapu et al. 2011; Shang et al. 2011b). These very recent reports demonstrate the great potential of AuNCs as optical probes for intracellular imaging and subcellular targeting.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Confocal microscopy images of intracellular delivery of AuNCs. HeLa cells were treated with 11-mercaptoundecanonic acid-capped AuNCs (a, b) and peptide–functionalized AuNCs (cf) for 1.5 h. The left panel shows fluorescence images of AuNCs only (blue), while the right panel shows colocalization images of AuNCs-treated cells that were counterstained with a membrance dye (wheat germ agglutinin-conjugated Alexa 594; b, d, red) and a nuclear dye (SYTO 59; f, red). Scale bar 25 μm. Reprinted with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry (Lin et al. 2008)

Compared with visible light, the near-infrared region provides several advantages for cellular imaging, such as weak autofluorescence, minimal photobleaching, and low phototoxicity. Therefore, imaging agents with near-infrared fluorescence emission are particularly attractive for high-sensitivity fluorescence bioimaging (Frangioni 2003; Gao et al. 2010). Pradeep and coworkers (Muhammed et al. 2009) presented a successful example of producing near-infrared-emitting Au23 NCs with an etching-based strategy. With streptavidin bound to the particle surface, these AuNCs were observed to selectively stain human hepatoma cells (HepG2). These cells contain a large amount of biotin, which binds to streptavidin with high specificity and affinity. Recently, receptor-targeted near-infrared imaging of folate receptor-positive oral carcinoma cells was reported using folic acid-conjugated fluorescent Au25 NCs (Retnakumari et al. 2010). Receptor-targeted cancer detection was demonstrated on FR+ve oral carcinoma KB cells, where the folic acid-conjugated AuNCs were found to become internalized in significantly higher concentration compared with the negative control cell lines. The characteristic near-infrared emission from AuNCs made it possible to image the clusters under 700 – 800 nm emission, where the optical properties of blood and tissue are highly favorable for biomedical imaging. Furthermore, bright aqueous near-infrared fluorescent AuNCs capped with multidentate polymer were used as biomarkers to label cells of the hematopoietic system (Huang et al. 2011). The cancer cells incorporated more AuNCs than normal cells, as compared with the control group labeled with quantum dots.

Two-photon excitation is advantageous for deep-tissue imaging owing to its ability of better tissue penetration and the often quoted reduced phototoxicity of near-infrared light excitation (Diaspro and Robello 2000). Note, however, that the latter effect can be counterbalanced by the enormous intensities required for two-photon absorption. The outstanding two-photon absorption cross-sections of AuNCs make them promising markers for two-photon cellular imaging. Chou and coworkers (Liu et al. 2009) explored two-photon imaging of human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) using dextran-encapsulated AuNCs as probes. Upon two-photon excitation with 800-nm laser pulses in a confocal microscope, bright luminescence from AuNCs was observed in the cells. Glutathione-capped AuNCs with large two-photon absorption cross-section and extraordinary photostability have also shown considerable promise for two-photon excitation in live cell imaging (Polavarapu et al. 2011). Recently, we (Shang et al. 2011b) reported the internalization of D-penicillamine-coated AuNCs by imaging live HeLa cells with two-photon fluorescence excitation at 810 nm. Figure 2 shows bright luminescence from AuNCs inside the cells. Cells were also imaged at different z-positions for 3D reconstruction, confirming the presence of AuNCs inside the cells as well as adhering to the plasma membrane. Elucidating the details of the uptake mechanism of these ultrasmall NCs still requires further elaboration. However, the finding that most particles inside the cells existed in the form of large aggregates suggests that they are internalized by specific endocytosis pathways that package many tiny particles into endosomal vesicles (Jiang et al. 2010a, b; Lunov et al. 2011).

Fig. 2
figure 2

a Fluorescence images of HeLa cells after incubation with D-penicillamine-coated AuNCs (100 μg/ml) for 2 h, taken with 810-nm two-photon excitation. b Cross-section of a 3D image reconstruction, showing internalized AuNCs. AuNC fluorescence was recorded in a spectral window from 557 to 607 nm (green channel), whereas the emission of the membrane stain DiD was detected in a band from 647 to 703 nm (red channel)

In contrast to fluorescence intensity imaging, lifetime-based imaging is independent of fluorophore concentration and laser excitation intensity. Importantly, however, the fluorescence lifetime of the fluorophores can be exquisitely sensitive to the local environment. Consequently, fluorescence lifetime imaging may provide contrast due to spatial variations of the lifetime and, thus, may yield valuable additional information (Borst and Visser 2010). We have recently introduced a facile strategy of synthesizing near-infrared-emitting lipoic acid-coated AuNCs (Shang et al. 2011a). Besides ultrasmall size, good colloidal stability, and biocompatibility, these AuNCs possess a long fluorescence lifetime (>100 ns), much longer than that of cellular autofluorescence and the fluorescence of organic dyes, so that, by using time-gated detection, their emission can be detected absolutely background-free. After exposing HeLa cells to AuNCs for 1 h, luminescent emitters with long fluorescence lifetimes (500–800 ns) were observed inside the cells, suggesting that the AuNCs had been internalized (Fig. 3). Note that the fluorescence decay of lipoic acid-coated AuNCs in the cells is slower than in aqueous solution, reflecting the modified NC environment during the uptake process including the formation of a protein corona around the particles (Röcker et al. 2009; Jiang et al. 2010b; Maffre et al. 2011). Furthermore, the fluorescence lifetime images clearly show an interesting contrast among AuNCs in different locations: NCs near the cell membrane display longer lifetimes than those inside the cells. Thus, fluorescence lifetime imaging not only reveals the cellular uptake of AuNCs but also provides information on changes in their local environment. All these results indicate that AuNCs have a great potential as robust fluorophores in biomedical imaging, especially in combination with advanced microscopy techniques (Su et al. 2010; Quan et al. 2010; Jiang et al. 2011).

Fig. 3
figure 3

Confocal microscopy images of HeLa cells without (a, b) and with (c, d) incubation with 100 μg/ml lipoic acid-coated AuNCs for 1 h. Fluorescence intensity (a, c) and lifetime (b, d) images were taken with pulsed diode laser (470 nm) excitation and a band-pass emission filter 690/70 (center wavelength/width), using time correlated single photon counting. Lifetime maps were calculated by determining the lifetime from the fluorescence decays of all the photon counts registered for each pixel. Scale bar 10 μm

Fluorescence imaging of gold nanoclusters in vivo

Compared with cellular imaging, in vivo imaging of a multicellular organism faces different challenges caused by the increase in sample complexity and the poor transmission of visible light through biological tissue (Rao et al. 2007; Wang et al. 2010). Correspondingly, ultrasmall AuNCs with emission in the near-infrared region, excellent stability, and good photophysical properties would be ideal markers for live animal imaging.

Wu et al. (2010) presented the first application of AuNCs-based in vivo fluorescence imaging; they explored the possibility of using near-infrared-emitting bovine serum albumin-stabilized AuNCs as imaging agents for tumor fluorescence imaging in vivo. The fluorescence of the AuNCs was easily visualized upon injection into the muscle up to a few millimeters owing to the enhanced tissue penetration afforded by near-infrared fluorescence (Fig. 4). AuNCs were also intravenously injected into mice for whole-body real-time in vivo imaging. Immediately after tail vein injection of AuNCs, bright fluorescence from the superficial vasculature of the whole body could easily be visualized. Fluorescence was visible in the circulation even 5 h post-injection, and decreased noticeably within a day. Further in vivo and ex vivo studies showed that these ultrasmall AuNCs accumulated predominantly in tumor sites resulting from the enhanced permeability and retention effect. The authors also presented a quantitative report on the biodistribution of AuNCs in different organs. They found that uptake of AuNCs by the reticule-endothelial system (e.g., liver, spleen) is relatively small in comparison with other nanoparticle-based contrast imaging agents due to their ultrasmall hydrodynamic size (ca. 2.7 nm).

Fig. 4
figure 4

In vivo fluorescence images of mice injected with 100 μl AuNCs (a) subcutaneously (a 0.235 mg ml−1, b 2.35 mg ml−1) and (b) intramuscularly (2.35 mg ml−1). c Real-time in vivo abdomen images taken upon intravenous injection with 200 μl of AuNCs (2.35 mg ml−−1) at different time points post-injection. Reprinted with permission from the Royal Society of Chemistry (Wu et al. 2010)

In a similar study, Sun et al. (2011) evaluated red-emitting ferritin-encapsulated AuNCs as fluorescent probes for in vivo imaging, with the ferritin providing specificity to target certain cells and tissues. They injected these AuNCs via the lateral tail vein into (nude) female mice, which were then subjected to whole-body fluorescence imaging. Fluorescent regions with a kidney-like shape were observed on either side of the spine 30 min post-injection and remained visible for at least 7 h (Fig. 5). Such a significant accumulation of nanoparticles in kidneys was assumed to indicate the involvement of a specific uptake mechanism related to the existence of certain ferritin receptors in kidney. In addition to kidney fluorescence, strong signals were also observed in the central dorsal region from liver and spleen, as further confirmed by ex vivo imaging experiments. Quantitation of the distribution of AuNCs using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry revealed that liver, kidney, and spleen were the major target tissues of ferritin-encapsulated AuNCs 2 h post-injection, compared with very low Au level in lung and heart. The biodistribution results are consistent with previous work on bovine serum albumin-stabilized AuNCs (Wu et al. 2010). These new results are important milestones for the development of AuNCs as contrast agents for targeted imaging and in vivo applications.

Fig. 5
figure 5

In vivo and ex vivo imaging female nude mice injected with ferritin-encapsulated AuNCs. a Whole body dorsal fluorescence images at different time points after Au NC injection. For each panel, the Au NC-injected mouse is shown on the right; a saline-injected control is shown on the left. b Fluorescence images of mouse organs 6 h after AuNCs injection. Control mice are shown on the left. c Fluorescence images of mouse organs at different time points after injection. The final concentration of AuNCs was 0.8 nmol/g body weight. The excitation filter transmitted from 576 to 621 nm; the emission was collected through a 635-nm long-pass filter. Reprinted with permission from American Chemical Society (Sun et al. 2011)

For in vivo biomedical applications, renal clearance is of fundamental importance to ensure that the contrast agents can be effectively cleared from the body, thereby avoiding accumulation in organs and interference with other diagnostic tests (Linkov et al. 2008; Schipper et al. 2009). Recently, Zheng et al. (2011) studied renal clearance of glutathione-coated luminescent AuNCs and revealed that only 3.7 % of the clusters accumulated in the liver; over 50 % of the clusters were found in urine within 24 h after intravenous injection, which is comparable to the quantum dots with the best renal clearance efficiency (Soo Choi et al. 2007). In addition, renal clearance of glutathione-coated AuNCs was at least 10 times better than that of similarly sized AuNCs coated with cysteine, a ligand known to significantly enhance renal clearance of quantum dots in vivo (Soo Choi et al. 2007). The small size in combination with suitable surface ligands not only enables the majority of the luminescent AuNCs to be cleared out of the body through kidney filtration but also stabilizes the luminescent AuNCs during blood circulation. Based on these applications and rapid progress in synthesizing near-infrared luminescent AuNCs, we anticipate their widespread use in in vivo biomedical imaging.

Biocompatibility of gold nanoclusters

Cytotoxicity and the potential influence of imaging agents on the cellular processes are primary issues in any live cell or whole animal imaging experiment (Feliu and Fadeel 2010; Soenen et al. 2011). Ultrasmall AuNCs are generally considered non-toxic, similar to bulk gold, which is chemically inert and biocompatible. It appears that toxicity should be even further alleviated due to their minimal metal content. However, recent studies reported adverse effects of Au nanoparticles on the cytoskeletal structure and cell viability by interacting with DNA and inducing oxidative stress (Pan et al. 2009; Chompoosor et al. 2010; Khlebtsov and Dykman 2011). While these toxicity issues are complicated by the wide variety of parameters, for example, cell types and physicochemical properties of the nanoparticles including size, colloidal stability, and ligand chemistry (Pan et al. 2007b; Sohaebuddin et al. 2010; Schaeublin et al. 2011), the majority of reports on luminescent AuNCs did not find adverse effects on cell viability or morphology at the concentrations used for imaging experiments. However, in light of the key relevance of nanotoxicity for biomedical applications, further inquiry into these issues is highly desirable.

Measurement of mitochondrial damage using the methyl thiazolyl tetrazolium (MTT) assay revealed negligible toxicity of AuNCs for a variety of cell lines, including human neuroblastoma cells (Polavarapu et al. 2011), HeLa cells (Shang et al. 2011a), and human endothelial cells (Retnakumari et al. 2010; Wang et al. 2011), for AuNC concentrations below 500 μg/ml. In addition, the possible occurrence of reactive oxygen stress caused by the interaction of cells with AuNCs has been evaluated (Retnakumari et al. 2010). Practically no reactive oxygen species stress was observed for folic acid-conjugated Au NC-treated cells. The cell membrane integrity upon the treatment of D-penicillamine-coated AuNCs has also been tested with a trypan blue exclusion test (Shang et al. 2011b), which also indicated that these AuNCs do not cause adverse effects. Moreover, the in vitro experiments on cultured cells did not observe morphological changes that would hint at adverse effects of AuNCs exposure within a reasonable concentration range. Particularly, Wang et al. (2011) compared the viability of endothelial cells treated with AuNCs and quantum dots and reported a better biocompatibility of AuNCs.

To assess toxicity in vivo, the body weight of AuNCs-treated mice was monitored and compared with control mice injected with phosphate buffer saline (Wu et al. 2010). Over a period of 1 month, the body weight of mice injected with bovine serum albumin-stabilized AuNCs changed only slightly, while the mice were observed to live normally without any sign of acute toxic responses or long-term toxic effects, suggesting the non-toxic nature of the AuNCs administered to the mice.

Outlook

Despite impressive progress on the biological application of fluorescent AuNCs in recent years, knowledge of their interactions within the complex biological environment is still limited. It would be important to understand the surface interactions of biomacromolecules with these ultrasmall particles and to see how these interactions affect the biological activity (Jiang et al. 2010b; Walczyk et al. 2010; Stark 2011). Moreover, we also need to better understand the mechanisms by which AuNCs are taken up by the cells (Iversen et al. 2011). In view of the large surface-to-volume ratio of these ultrasmall NCs, surface modifications, e.g., due to binding of proteins, are likely to alter their photophysical properties, which may in turn affect their performance as optical markers. Recently, we investigated the interactions of AuNCs with four different proteins (human serum albumin, apotransferrin, lysozyme, and apolipoprotein E4) and the effects on their fluorescence (Shang et al. 2012a). All proteins were observed to bind with roughly micromolar affinities to lipoic acid-coated AuNCs. Upon protein association, the fluorescence of AuNCs was significantly enhanced and, concomitantly, their luminescence lifetime was prolonged. These results provided clear evidence that protein binding to the surfaces of ultrasmall fluorescent AuNCs has a significant influence on their photophysical properties.

With the development of nanoscale contrast agents for the fields of diagnostics and whole-body imaging, integration of multiple functionalities within one nanoparticle would easily allow their detection with several imaging techniques or to include therapeutic qualities (Mulder et al. 2007). For example, in clinical applications requiring in vivo imaging in living subjects, imaging agents geared towards both fluorescence and magnetic resonance imaging can be particularly advantageous because optical and magnetic detection can be employed in a complementary fashion (Koktysh et al. 2011). In this regard, great opportunities and challenges remain for materials chemists to produce high quality, AuNCs-based multifunctional probes for advanced biomedical imaging application (Muhammed and Pradeep 2011; Durgadas et al. 2011).

Conjugation of imaging agents with biomolecules such as antibodies, enzymes, DNA, or oligosaccharides is a prerequisite to their use as biological probes for specific fluorescence imaging (Erathodiyil and Ying 2011), because it enables researchers to target desired locations within cells, tissues, and organs, reduce overall toxicity, and boost the efficiency of the imaging probes (Lin et al. 2009; Retnakumari et al. 2010). This research has as yet seen rather slow progress for AuNCs. In this regard, the presence of reactive moieties on the surface of AuNCs, allowing further mild, selective, and stable ligation with biomolecules, is of crucial importance. Many nanoparticle functionalization techniques have been reported in the literature; however, chemical engineering on the surface of AuNCs can pose particular challenges in view of their extraordinarily high surface-volume ratio, polydispersed nature, and sensitivity of the fluorescence response to the environment (Wu and Jin 2010; Shang et al. 2012a). Anyhow, engineering of luminescent AuNCs with biorecognition capabilities would be of great value for a wide range of life sciences applications.

Yet another area in which further progress will be highly appreciated is a thorough study on the toxicity of AuNCs. Although many reports have indicated a good biocompatibility, toxicity of these ultrasmall particles has so far only been explored to a limited extent. Much more needs to be done so that they can be used with confidence in biomedical applications on humans. A comprehensive examination of biocompatibility will be necessary by analyzing cellular responses, e.g., apoptosis, DNA damage, and oxidative stress (Marquis et al. 2009; Zhao et al. 2011). Moreover, extensive studies of the effects of AuNCs on cell growth and living organisms over extended periods of time need to be performed.