Abstract
In the recent years, microalgae have captured researchers’ attention as the alternative feedstock for various bioenergy production such as biodiesel, biohydrogen, and bioethanol. Cultivating microalgae in wastewaters to simultaneously bioremediate the nutrient-rich wastewater and maintain a high biomass yield is a more economical and environmentally friendly approach. The incorporation of algal–bacterial interaction reveals the mutual relationship of microorganisms where algae are primary producers of organic compounds from CO2, and heterotrophic bacteria are secondary consumers decomposing the organic compounds produced from algae. This review would provide an insight on the challenges and future development of algal–bacterial consortium and its contribution in promoting a sustainable route to greener industry. It is believed that microalgal-bacterial consortia will be implemented in the near-future for sub-sequential treatment of wastewater bioremediation, bioenergy production and CO2 fixation, promoting sustainability and making extraordinary advancement in life sciences sectors.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
It is undeniable that microalgae play a significant role in representing the fundamental plant producers and promising feedstock in the biological community. In the recent years, microalgae has been placed in the spotlight as the alternative feedstock for renewable bioenergy production. The awareness of utilizing microalgae as an alternative feedstock has evolved from laboratory research into industrial scale mainly stemming from the economic and environmental benefits that have been reported by numerous studies [1,2,3]. The ability of these photosynthetic microalgae to absorb carbon as nutrients has mitigated the concerns on carbon dioxide (CO2) release to the atmosphere and this makes them attractive for the emerging circular bioeconomy comprising of carbon footprint reduction with renewable soruces generation [4]. Considering the impractical cost of typical microalgae cultivation (i.e., using cultivation medium and water), the substitution of medium with wastewater sources through assimilation of nutrients from wastewater sources has shown great prospects [1, 3]. This approach will be more economical and environmentally friendly in the upstream processing by simultaneously bioremediating the nutrient-rich wastewater and maintaining a high biomass yield [5].
Alternatively, ecological studies revealed that specific groups of bacteria have similar association with certain microalgae through synergistic influence to obtain physical and metabolism benefits [6]. The incorporation of algal–bacterial interaction revealed the mutual relationship of microorganisms where algae are primary producers of organic compounds from CO2, and heterotrophic bacteria are secondary consumers that decompose these organic compounds produced [7]. The limitations associated with microalgae cultivation could be addressed by introducing algal–bacterial symbiosis which can provide a positive effect on the upsurge of algal growth, spore germination, pathogen resistance, harvesting process and morphogenesis, making it beneficial for various biotechnological applications [8]. Ongoing researches on algal–bacterial consortia have been recognised for their scientific contribution in promoting sustainability and greener industry for creating advancement and impact to life sciences research [9,10,11].
The writing and conceptualization of this review was conducted via online databases search to identify similar research studies, where four keywords (i.e. microalgal-bacterial; bioenergy; environmental management and bioremediation) were used to identify related articles (46 results found) to obtain information from peer-reviewed journals, scientific reports and books related to this review topic. Subsequently, this review focused on articles within 5 years (2015–2020) and 43 relevant articles were found. Among these articles, their suitability and relevancy were manually screened before included into the review. The selected articles were categorized into their respective sub-sections namely bioenergy production, wastewater bioremediation and environmental management. This review will provide insights on the future development of algal–bacterial consortia and its contribution in promoting a sustainable route to greener industry.
Insights of Microalgal-Bacterial Consortia in Wastewater Bioremediation
Wastewater sources such as municipal wastewater, industrial wastewater, rubber effluent and palm oil mill effluent have to be treated before discharging into water bodies as they composed of large amount of contaminants (e.g., ammonium ions (NH4+), nitrate ions (NO3−) and phosphate ion (PO43−) [12]. Microalgal-bacterial consortium has shown its capabilities for bioremediating contaminants, absorbing nutrients, reducing chemical oxygen demand (COD), total dissolved phosphorus (TDP), total dissolved nitrogen (TDN) and biochemical/biological oxygen demand (BOD) as a biological tool for environmental control [13]. The symbiosis interaction between microalgal-bacterial consortium undergoes exchange of O2, CO2 and NH4+ ions in the wastewater treatment process, where these bacteria oxidize organic carbon compounds in the wastewater sources and convert them into CO2 (Fig. 1). The produced CO2 by bacteria was then respirated by these algae for photosynthesis and conversion of CO2 to algal cell materials [14]. The removal efficiency of nutrient from wastewater sources with symbiosis interaction of microalgal-bacterial will also increase with rise in the biological metabolism of biomass growth. Apart from its utilization for detoxifying organic and inorganic pollutant from wastewater sources, it can recover resources for bioeconomy of both high- and low-value products (i.e. fertilizers, algal-based plastics and fibres and aquaculture feed). Table 1 summarized the microalgal-bacterial consortium used in various wastewater bioremediation.
Insight of Microalgal-Bacterial Consortia in Bioenergy and Bioproduct Production
Microalgae-based biofuels are considered an important energy source due to its availability, rapid productivity and CO2 fixation in regards to the current world energy crisis [25, 26]. There are various bioenergy and bioproducts production such as biochar, biofuels and even secondary metabolite available from utilizing microalgae. The process “pyrolysis” is to convert algal biomass into biochar which is enriched with carbon to enhance the pH of acidic soil condition. The composition of these algal-based biochar composed of high nutrient content (i.e. nitrogen, phosphorus and inorganic element) to enhance the soil fertility for agricultural purposes. Besides that, algal-based biochar has also been subjected as bio-sorbents for wastewater remediation purposes due to its specific functional group presence on the surface of biochar [27].
As for biofuel production (e.g., biodiesel and biohydrogen), these anaerobic bacteria and microalgae consortia will undergo direct or indirect pyrolysis to produce biohydrogen. It has been proposed that the production of O2 from microalgae are done through respiration by the bacteria which is beneficial in maintaining an anaerobic environment for biohydrogen production without sulfur deprivation [28]. This finding was supported by Wirth et al. [29] revealing that Rhizobium sp. consumed O2 concentration of 21.0% to 4.5% in 12 h, which simultaneously allowed 1.15 ± 0.01 ml/L of H2 produced by microalgae biomass in the next 16 h. However, there was no H2 production by microalgae biomass without the presence of Rhizobium sp. in the microalgal culture. On the other hand, the presence of these bacteria enhanced the growth rate of microalgae by providing phytohormones or macro- and micro-nutrients within 10–70% biomass productivity [10]. This was supported by Leong et al. [1] who reported the feasibility of microalgal-bacterial interaction in promoting simultaneous nitrification and assimilation activities for high biomass and lipid production of 1.42 g/L and 0.242 g/L, respectively in municipal wastewater. These are several studies associated to the evaluation of microalgal-bacterial consortia for biofuel production [24, 30,31,32,33,34].
Recent researches have shown the potential of these microalgae as a prospective source of valuable bioproduct for direct human supplement and nutritional product [35]. The transformation of microalgal-bacterial biomass into high value-added commodities would provide a more sustainable and economical process for the downstream bioprocessing industries. For instance, the biosynthesis of polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) derived from microalgal-bacterial consortia and it is considered as a promising green alternative over conventional petrochemical-based plastics [36]. The properties of PHAs obtained from bacterial-based is similar with the conventional plastics, but with added-value such as biodegradability and biocompatibility properties [37]. It has been successfully demonstrated by Fradinho et al. [38] on utilizing microalgal-bacterial consortia for the production of PHA content as high as 20% PHA storage yield per acetate depending on the culture condition [38]. Despite of its advantages, the commercialization of utilizing microalgal-bacterial consortia remains a challenge where external factors that includes the capital cost, market demand, public acceptance, environmental and health risk are needed to be addressed [39].
Insight of Microalgal-Bacterial Consortia in Greenhouse Gases CO2 Fixation
Carbon dioxide, CO2 is one of the main contributors of greenhouse effect exhaust from fossil fuel combustion which is directly contributed to global warming. Based on recent study, the CO2 concentration is over 400 ppm, which is the highest level in over 800,000 years [40]. As mentioned above, microalgae have the capability in consuming high values of CO2 by converting them into chemical energy with the presence of sunlight; as compared to terrestrial plant, CO2 fixation efficiency of microalgae are 10 to 50-folds higher [41]. In the microalgal-bacterial symbiotic interaction, the exchange of substrate CO2 and O2 are needed for both algae growth and CO2 fixation. As proposed by Subashchandrabose et al. [42], microalgal-consortium is a more environmentally friendly method towards carbon mitigation. This revealed that photosynthetic microalgae are proficient resources for CO2 fixation in the framework of a sustainable low-carbon economy [43].
It has also been reported that Thalassiosira pseudonana diatom, and heterotrophic bacteria Pelagibacter sp. HTCC1062 (SAR11) increases the carbon fixation rate by 20.3% [44]. Moreover, this was supported by Gao et al. [45] who conducted the co-culturing of Chlorella vulgaris with activated sludge bacteria and the results exhibited optimal CO2 removal efficiency of 63.48%. Table 2 summarized the CO2 removal efficiency by microalgal-bacterial consortia. Based on these published articles and evaluation in this review, microalgal-bacterial consortia will be implemented in the near-future for sub-sequential treatment of wastewater bioremediation, bioenergy production and CO2 fixation.
Challenges and Perspectives
The algal-bacterial symbiosis has higher proficiency to bioremediate toxic contaminants from the wastewater compared to the single bacterial or algal system because it can compensate in terms of pollutant removal, cost-efficient aeration, and greenhouse gases sequestration. However, consortia involving microalgae and mixed microflora from activated sludge are not usually focused on, and the complexity of the microorganisms in the consortia leads to difficulty in controlling the system stability and this would affect the outcome of wastewater treatment [49]. The screening study of specific symbiotic bacterial strains and subsequent selective establishment of a stable system are essential. Enzymology requires further exploration, particularly the enzymatic mechanism between microalgae and bacteria throughout the wastewater bioremediation process. Moreover, algal-bacterial consortia shows potential for improved biohydrogen production, but it still has low recovery rates and yields, even way before its readiness to industrial application. Strategies such as genetic modifications, cell immobilization, physiological treatments like Mg deprivation, light modulation and oxygen scavengers should be investigated for further improvement of H2 production. For an economic production of biofuel and final commercialization of microalgal-bacterial bioenergy, techno-economic assessment (TEA) and life cycle assessment (LCA) are important tools in terms of resource availability, economic feasibility, productivity of microalgal-bacterial consortia, environmental sustainability, quality of energy dynamics and renewability. On the other hand, promising biotechnological applications of microalgae-bacterial consortia such as CO2 fixation are lacking of convincing data from the actual applications based on the current knowledge [50]. This is because these studies are conducted in lab units and has not been applied in scale-up conditions such as different system capacity and external factors like seasonable environmental changes may also affect the algal-bacterial system. Hence, besides studies on community structures and interaction between microalgae and bacteria, future research requires large scale outdoor experiments to evaluate its economic viability and sustainability of these biotechnological applications.
Conclusion
In brief, the system of algal–bacterial consortium can be applied in wastewater bioremediation, bioenergy production and CO2 fixation. The utilization of algal–bacterial symbiotic system in wastewater treatment technology can result in higher algal biomass and higher contaminant removal, thus minimizing the cultivation of microalgae culture and bioremediation cost for polluted wastewaters. Moreover, anaerobic bacteria and microalgae consortia undergo direct or indirect pyrolysis to produce biohydrogen and they can maintain an anaerobic environment for biohydrogen production since bacteria consumes the oxygen produced by microalgae. Additionally, microalgal-bacterial consortium can increase the carbon fixation rate with much higher efficiency compared to terrestrial plants. The processes utilizing microalgal-bacterial consortia are indeed renewable and sustainable technology to be applied in the current microalgal industry, along with more future research on microalgal-bacterial interaction mechanism, economical analysis for the commercialization and up-scaling for further potential applications.
References
Leong WH, Zaine SNA, Ho YC, Uemura Y, Lam MK, Khoo KS, Kiatkittipong W, Cheng CK, Show PL, Lim JW (2019) Impact of various microalgal-bacterial populations on municipal wastewater bioremediation and its energy feasibility for lipid-based biofuel production. J Environ Manag 249:109384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.109384
Rashid N, Rehman MSU, Sadiq M, Mahmood T, Han J-I (2014) Current status, issues and developments in microalgae derived biodiesel production. Renew Sust Energy Rev 40:760–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.104
Rosli SS, Kadir WNA, Wong CY, Han FY, Lim JW, Lam MK, Yusup S, Kiatkittipong W, Kiatkittipong K, Usman A (2020) Insight review of attached microalgae growth focusing on support material packed in photobioreactor for sustainable biodiesel production and wastewater bioremediation. Renew Sust Energ Rev 134:110306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110306
Nitsos C, Filali R, Taidi B, Lemaire J (2020) Current and novel approaches to downstream processing of microalgae: a review. Biotechnol Adv. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2020.107650
Arita CEQ, Peebles C, Bradley TH (2015) Scalability of combining microalgae-based biofuels with wastewater facilities: a review. Algal Res 9:160–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2015.03.001
Gothandam K, Ranjan S, Dasgupta N, Ramalingam C, Lichtfouse E (2018) Nanotechnology, food security and water treatment, vol 11. Springer, Berlin
Kouzuma A, Watanabe K (2015) Exploring the potential of algae/bacteria interactions. Curr Opin Biotechnol 33:125–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2015.02.007
Yao S, Lyu S, An Y, Lu J, Gjermansen C, Schramm A (2019) Microalgae–bacteria symbiosis in microalgal growth and biofuel production: a review. J Appl Microbiol 126:359–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.14095
Shah MP, Rodriguez-Couto S (2019) Microbial wastewater treatment. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Ramanan R, Kim B-H, Cho D-H, Oh H-M, Kim H-S (2016) Algae–bacteria interactions: evolution, ecology and emerging applications. Biotechnol Adv 34:14–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.12.003
Mahdavi H, Prasad V, Liu Y, Ulrich AC (2015) In situ biodegradation of naphthenic acids in oil sands tailings pond water using indigenous algae–bacteria consortium. Bioresour Technol 187:97–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.03.091
Ahmad A, Buang A, Bhat A (2016) Renewable and sustainable bioenergy production from microalgal co-cultivation with palm oil mill effluent (POME): a review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 65:214–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.06.084
Molinuevo-Salces B, Riaño B, Hernández D, García-González MC (2019) Microalgae and wastewater treatment: advantages and disadvantages. In: Microalgae biotechnology for development of biofuel and wastewater treatment. Springer, Berlin, pp 505–533
Chang J-S, Show P-L, Ling T-C, Chen C-Y, Ho S-H, Tan C-H, Nagarajan D, Phong W-N (2017) Photobioreactors. In: Current developments in biotechnology and bioengineering. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 313–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63663-8.00011-2
Ji X, Li H, Zhang J, Saiyin H, Zheng Z (2019) The collaborative effect of Chlorella vulgaris-Bacillus licheniformis consortia on the treatment of municipal water. J Hazard Mater 365:483–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.11.039
Foladori P, Petrini S, Nessenzia M, Andreottola G (2018) Enhanced nitrogen removal and energy saving in a microalgal–bacterial consortium treating real municipal wastewater. Water Sci Technol 78:174–182. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2018.094
Ryu B-G, Kim J, Han J-I, Yang J-W (2017) Feasibility of using a microalgal-bacterial consortium for treatment of toxic coke wastewater with concomitant production of microbial lipids. Bioresour Technol 225:58–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2016.11.029
Mujtaba G, Rizwan M, Lee K (2017) Removal of nutrients and COD from wastewater using symbiotic co-culture of bacterium Pseudomonas putida and immobilized microalga Chlorella vulgaris. J Ind Eng Chem 49:145–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2017.01.021
Ferro L, Gojkovic Z, Muñoz R, Funk C (2019) Growth performance and nutrient removal of a Chlorella vulgaris-Rhizobium sp. co-culture during mixotrophic feed-batch cultivation in synthetic wastewater. Algal Res 44:101690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2019.101690
Marazzi F, Bellucci M, Fantasia T, Ficara E, Mezzanotte V (2020) Interactions between microalgae and bacteria in the treatment of wastewater from milk whey processing. Water 12:297. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12010297
Fan J, Chen Y, Zhang TC, Ji B, Cao L (2020) Performance of Chlorella sorokiniana-activated sludge consortium treating wastewater under light-limited heterotrophic condition. Chem Eng J 382:122799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.122799
Huo S, Kong M, Zhu F, Qian J, Huang D, Chen P, Ruan R (2020) Co-culture of Chlorella and wastewater-borne bacteria in vinegar production wastewater: enhancement of nutrients removal and influence of algal biomass generation. Algal Res 45:101744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2019.101744
Lin C, Cao P, Xu X, Ye B (2019) Algal-bacterial symbiosis system treating high-load printing and dyeing wastewater in continuous-flow reactors under natural light. Water 11:469. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11030469
Meng F, Xi L, Liu D, Huang W, Lei Z, Zhang Z, Huang W (2019) Effects of light intensity on oxygen distribution, lipid production and biological community of algal-bacterial granules in photo-sequencing batch reactors. Bioresour Technol 272:473–481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.10.059
Khoo KS, Chew KW, Yew GY, Leong WH, Chai YH, Show PL, Chen W-H (2020) Recent advances in downstream processing of microalgae lipid recovery for biofuel production. Bioresour Technol 304:122996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122996
Chew KW, Yap JY, Show PL, Suan NH, Juan JC, Ling TC, Lee D-J, Chang J-S (2017) Microalgae biorefinery: high value products perspectives. Bioresour Technol 229:53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.01.006
Cole AJ, Paul NA, De Nys R, Roberts DA (2017) Good for sewage treatment and good for agriculture: algal based compost and biochar. J Environ Manage 200:105–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.05.082
Lakatos G, Deák Z, Vass I, Rétfalvi T, Rozgonyi S, Rákhely G, Ördög V, Kondorosi É, Maróti G (2014) Bacterial symbionts enhance photo-fermentative hydrogen evolution of Chlamydomonas algae. Green Chem 16:4716–4727
Wirth R, Lakatos G, Maróti G, Bagi Z, Minárovics J, Nagy K, Kondorosi É, Rákhely G, Kovács KL (2015) Exploitation of algal-bacterial associations in a two-stage biohydrogen and biogas generation process. Biotechnol Biofuels 8:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-015-0243-x
Liu L, Hong Y, Ye X, Wei L, Liao J, Huang X, Liu C (2018) Biodiesel production from microbial granules in sequencing batch reactor. Bioresour Technol 249:908–915. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.10.105
Arcila JS, Buitrón G (2016) Microalgae–bacteria aggregates: effect of the hydraulic retention time on the municipal wastewater treatment, biomass settleability and methane potential. J Chem Technol Biotechnol 91:2862–2870. https://doi.org/10.1002/jctb.4901
Van Den Hende S, Laurent C, Bégué M (2015) Anaerobic digestion of microalgal bacterial flocs from a raceway pond treating aquaculture wastewater: need for a biorefinery. Bioresour Technol 196:184–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.07.058
Wieczorek N, Kucuker MA, Kuchta K (2015) Microalgae-bacteria flocs (MaB-Flocs) as a substrate for fermentative biogas production. Bioresour Technol 194:130–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2015.06.104
Hernández D, Riaño B, Coca M, García-González M (2013) Treatment of agro-industrial wastewater using microalgae–bacteria consortium combined with anaerobic digestion of the produced biomass. Bioresour Technol 135:598–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.09.029
Tang DYY, Khoo KS, Chew KW, Tao Y, Ho S-H, Show PL (2020) Potential utilization of bioproducts from microalgae for the quality enhancement of natural products. Bioresour Technol 304:122997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122997
Verlinden RA, Hill DJ, Kenward M, Williams CD, Radecka I (2007) Bacterial synthesis of biodegradable polyhydroxyalkanoates. J Appl Microbiol 102:1437–1449. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2007.03335.x
Hwangbo M, Chu K-H (2020) Recent advances in production and extraction of bacterial lipids for biofuel production. Sci Total Environ. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139420
Fradinho J, Domingos J, Carvalho G, Oehmen A, Reis M (2013) Polyhydroxyalkanoates production by a mixed photosynthetic consortium of bacteria and algae. Bioresour Technol 132:146–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.01.050
Kourmentza C, Plácido J, Venetsaneas N, Burniol-Figols A, Varrone C, Gavala HN, Reis MA (2017) Recent advances and challenges towards sustainable polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) production. Bioengineering 4:55. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering4020055
Show PL, Tang MS, Nagarajan D, Ling TC, Ooi C-W, Chang J-S (2017) A holistic approach to managing microalgae for biofuel applications. Int J Mol Sci 18:215. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms18010215
Xu X, Gu X, Wang Z, Shatner W, Wang Z (2019) Progress, challenges and solutions of research on photosynthetic carbon sequestration efficiency of microalgae. Renew Sust Energ Rev 110:65–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.04.050
Subashchandrabose SR, Ramakrishnan B, Megharaj M, Venkateswarlu K, Naidu R (2011) Consortia of cyanobacteria/microalgae and bacteria: biotechnological potential. Biotechnol Adv 29:896–907. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2011.07.009
Yang B, Liu J, Ma X, Guo B, Liu B, Wu T, Jiang Y, Chen F (2017) Genetic engineering of the Calvin cycle toward enhanced photosynthetic CO 2 fixation in microalgae. Biotechnol Biofuels 10:1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-017-0916-8
Moore ER, Davie-Martin CL, Giovannoni SJ, Halsey KH (2020) Pelagibacter metabolism of diatom-derived volatile organic compounds imposes an energetic tax on photosynthetic carbon fixation. Environ Microbiol 22:1720–1733. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.14861
Gao S, Hu C, Sun S, Xu J, Zhao Y, Zhang H (2018) Performance of piggery wastewater treatment and biogas upgrading by three microalgal cultivation technologies under different initial COD concentration. Energy 165:360–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.09.190
Anbalagan A, Toledo-Cervantes A, Posadas E, Rojo EM, Lebrero R, González-Sánchez A, Nehrenheim E, Muñoz R (2017) Continuous photosynthetic abatement of CO2 and volatile organic compounds from exhaust gas coupled to wastewater treatment: evaluation of tubular algal-bacterial photobioreactor. J CO2 Util 21:353–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2017.07.016
Yadav G, Sharma I, Ghangrekar M, Sen R (2020) A live bio-cathode to enhance power output steered by bacteria-microalgae synergistic metabolism in microbial fuel cell. J Power Sources 449:227560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227560
Sepehri A, Sarrafzadeh M-H, Avateffazeli M (2020) Interaction between Chlorella vulgaris and nitrifying-enriched activated sludge in the treatment of wastewater with low C/N ratio. J Clean Prod 247:119164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119164
Wang Y, Wang S, Sun L, Sun Z, Li D (2020) Screening of a Chlorella-bacteria consortium and research on piggery wastewater purification. Algal Res 47:101840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2020.101840
Zhang B, Li W, Guo Y, Zhang Z, Shi W, Cui F, Lens PN, Tay JH (2020) Microalgal-bacterial consortia: From interspecies interactions to biotechnological applications. Renew Sust Energ Rev 118:109563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109563
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Fundamental Research Grant Scheme, Malaysia [FRGS/1/2019/STG05/UNIM/02/2] and MyPAIR-PHC-Hibiscus Grant [MyPAIR/1/2020/STG05/UNIM/1].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Khoo, K.S., Chia, W.Y., Chew, K.W. et al. Microalgal-Bacterial Consortia as Future Prospect in Wastewater Bioremediation, Environmental Management and Bioenergy Production. Indian J Microbiol 61, 262–269 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-021-00924-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-021-00924-8