Abstract
This review of the familial tumor syndromes involving the endocrine organs is focused on discussing the main updates on the upcoming fifth edition of the WHO Classification of Endocrine and Neuroendocrine Tumors. This review emphasizes updates on histopathological and molecular genetics aspects of the most important syndromes involving the endocrine organs. We describe the newly defined Familial Cancer Syndromes as MAFA-related, MEN4, and MEN5 as well as the newly reported pathological findings in DICER1 syndrome. We also describe the updates done at the new WHO on the syndromic and non-syndromic familial thyroid diseases. We emphasize the problem of diagnostic criteria, mention the new genes that are possibly involved in this group, and at the same time, touching upon the role of some immunohistochemical studies that could support the diagnosis of some of these conditions. As pathologists play an important role in identifying tumors within a familial cancer syndrome, we highlight the most important clues for raising the suspicious of a syndrome. Finally, we highlight the challenges in defining these entities as well as determining their clinical outcome in comparison with sporadic tumors. Instead of the usual subject review, we present the highlights of the updates on familial cancer syndromes by answering select questions relevant to practicing pathologists.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
In this manuscript, we will discuss the updates on the coming 2022 WHO Classification of Endocrine and Neuroendocrine Tumours on Familial Cancer Syndromes involving the Endocrine System. We present the newly described familial tumor syndromes involving the endocrine system, the main updates on the known syndromes, and the highlights of these syndromes focused on the most recent developments.
Although some of the familial cancer syndromes have been described over 100 years ago, recognizable tumor-predisposing syndromes have been broadly documented during the last decades due to the fast-increasing use of DNA sequencing in diagnostic pathology, molecular pathology, and clinical genetics. The routine use of NGS will certainly continue to widen the spectrum of known predisposing genetic variants among patients with endocrine tumors.
A substantial number of patients with familial tumor syndromes present with a disease that does not alert the physician to be a familial disease but appears to be sporadic disease. A cautious clinical certification of familial syndromes that can be related with some cancers help diagnose germline-driven neoplasia. What appears to be a sporadic tumor is fitting less often so, due to the use of more powerful investigation. Consequently, more often new syndromes and tumors associated with these syndromes are being reported.
Pathologists have a crucial role in diagnosing tumors associated with the heritable syndromes. The characteristic morphological, immunophenotypic and molecular findings are addressed in this section. Pathologists must be attentive of the histopathological features associated with distinct syndromes that should prompt consideration of germline screening. Information on underlying genetic variants might have an impact on the choice of therapy and surveillance guidelines.
We summarize all these entities emphasizing the pathologist’s possibilities for recognizing the different familial cancer syndromes based on the histopathological and/or immunohistochemical features of the endocrine tissue involved on this syndrome.
Question 1: What Are the Newly Described Endocrine Familial Cancer Syndromes?
Three new familial cancer syndromes involving the endocrine organs and tissues have been defined over the last years. These syndromes are multiple endocrine neoplasia type 4 (MEN4), multiple endocrine neoplasia type 5 (MEN5), and MAFA-related insulinomatosis.
MEN4
MEN4 is a tumor syndrome, of an autosomal dominant, pattern caused by inactivating heterozygous germline mutations in the CDKN1B gene. The patients with this syndrome have a phenotype that mimics MEN1, as these patients develop tumors in the parathyroid, pituitary and pancreas (Fig. 1). These patients are identified with similar symptomatology as those with MEN1, but with negative MEN1 genetic testing.
Regarding the pathological findings as clues for a MEN4 diagnosis, there is only limited data available on histopathology and with no clear differences from sporadic cases are reported. The occurrence of multiple tumors of the spectrum is the only known clue [1]. Hyperparathyroidism is the frequently occurring symptom in about 75% of patients with this syndrome; uniglandular disease is frequent and no relapse after parathyroidectomy has been reported [2].
Overall, due to the inconstant presentation of MEN4, the recognition and the diagnosis of MEN4 can confirmed by genetic testing. Such genetic testing is recommended in patients with MEN1 phenotype, but are negative for MEN1 mutations [3,4,5].
MEN5
Germline variants in the MAX tumor suppressor gene cause the autosomal dominant MEN5.
Patients develop pheochromocytomas of the adrenal medulla, which are often bilateral and can have multiple lesions within one adrenal gland [6]. Malignant and/or metachronous disease is common [7,8,9,10]. Less frequently, extra-adrenal sympathetic paragangliomas, ganglioneuromas [11], ganglioneuroblastoma, composite pheochromocytoma/ganglioneuroma and neuroblastomas are described [12]. Parathyroid adenomas and functional pituitary NET (prolactinomas or somatotropinomas) often occur after pheochromocytomas [13,14,15]. In contrast to MEN2, medullary thyroid carcinomas and C-cell hyperplasia are not described.
MAX-associated tumors are often multiple, bilateral and/or multicentric, but are indistinguishable from their sporadic counterparts.
Adrenal medullary hyperplasia may occur in this syndrome, although it is less common than in patients with MEN2 syndrome and SDH-deficient PPGL [16, 17].
At present, MAX immunohistochemistry in routine clinical practice is limited and it is not recommended as a screening test of MAX mutation [15].
MAFA-Related Familial Insulinomatosis
MAFA-related familial insulinomatosis is an autosomal dominant syndrome caused by MAFA gene mutation sequence variants. This syndrome is characterized by multiple insulin-secreting pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors that usually present as adult-onset hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia.
The pancreas of patients with this disorder grossly demonstrates multifocal small tumors that vary in size reaching up to around 1 cm.
The pancreas of patients with MAFA-related insulinomatosis shows the characteristic multicentric and innumerable insulin-producing beta cell proliferations ranging from dysplastic B cell cords to multifocal neuroendocrine trabecular microadenomas (< 5 mm) and solitary well-differentiated tumors (> 5 mm) (Fig. 2). The Ki-67 proliferative index is constantly < 2%.
The WHO chapter on this topic highlights that while the islets contain insulin, glucagon, pancreatic polypeptide, and somatostatin producing cells in normal distribution and numbers, the trabecular proliferations are exclusively positive for insulin, which helps distinguish the condition from MEN1 and glucagon cell adenomatosis and hyperplasia [18, 19]. The multifocal nature of the beta cell proliferations suggests that total pancreatectomy would be required for cure [20].
Question 2: What Familial Cancer Syndrome Has Diverse Primitive-Type Tumors? Which Tumors and Endocrine-Related Neoplasms Are Part of This Syndrome?
Heterozygous DICER1 germline mutation causes DICER1 autosomal dominant familial tumor syndrome. Pleuropulmonary blastoma (PPB) is the most common primary malignant neoplasm of this syndrome involving the lung in young children. The previously called DICER1 PPB familial tumor predisposition syndrome was initially recognized in most cases because of the presence of PPB but also by several other unique and characteristic extrapulmonary tumors, have been described. DICER1 syndrome features several characteristic tumors and dysplastic conditions. Within the list of tumors associated with this syndrome are pediatric cystic nephroma, Sertoli-Leydig cell tumor, embryonal nasal chondromesenchymal hamartoma, gynandroblastoma, rhabdomyosarcoma of the cervix, primary central nervous system sarcoma, pituitary blastoma, embryonal tumor with multilayered rosettes-like cerebellar tumor, and ciliary body medulloepithelioma [21, 22] (Table 1). DICER1-associated presacral malignant teratoid neoplasm and other non-neoplastic associations are characterized by a second somatic mutation in DICER1.
From the endocrine pathology point of view, thyroid multinodular hyperplasia with unique findings as centripetal papillary hyperplasia, as well as neoplasms as follicular adenoma, differentiated (DTC) and poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma (PDTC) [23], pituitary blastoma, and pineoblastoma.
In DTC, somatic DICER1 alterations appear to be mutually exclusive with the most common somatic driver alterations including BRAFV600E, RAS mutations, and RET rearrangements [24,25,26,27].
The occurrence of a thyroid malignancy occurring in a younger patient, particularly if poorly differentiated or a macrofollicular variant of FTC should be considered as a clue of DICER1 involvement [26,27,28,29].
Pituitary Blastoma
Pituitary blastoma is an embryonal neoplasm within the sella turcica, composed of a mixture of primitive blastemal cells, neuroendocrine cells, and Rathke pouch epithelium, linked to germline and somatic DICER1 variants. Pituitary blastoma is associated with Cushing disease in infants [30, 31].
Pituitary blastoma resembles fetal pituitary gland of ~11 weeks gestation and is composed of three cellular components including large, adenohypophysial neuroendocrine cells arranged in lobules or diffuse sheets, cuboidal or columnar primitive Rathke pouch epithelium with rosette or gland/follicle formation, and small undifferentiated-blastemal cells. Neuroendocrine cells variably express pro-opiomelanocortin-derivates including ACTH (Fig. 3), beta-endorphin, and melanocyte-stimulating hormone [32]. Unlike neuroendocrine cells, blastemal and Rathke pouch cells rarely show pituitary transcription factor expression [30].
Thyroblastoma
The accepted WHO definition of this newly described thyroid neoplasm is as follows: thyroblastoma is an embryonal high-grade thyroid neoplasm composed of primitive thyroid-like follicular cells surrounded by a small cell component, of also a primitive nature, and a mesenchymal stroma, which shows a variable differentiation.
Thyroblastoma likely arise due to somatic mutations in the DICER1 gene. Thyroblastoma is not considered to be due to the germline mutations as in DICER1 syndrome. DICER1 mutations have been detected in all tested thyroblastoma cases.
Thyroblastoma is likely an underrecognized primitive thyroid neoplasm which has been previously diagnosed as the so-called malignant thyroid teratoma [33,34,35] or carcinosarcoma [36]. Due to the lack of standard terminology in earlier series, no epidemiological data is available.
Histologically, thyroblastoma is an embryonal neoplasm that mostly resembles thyroid parenchyma within the first trimester of prenatal development (Fig. 4). Thyroblastoma is composed of three cellular components including a component represented by fetal-type TTF1 + /PAX8 + /focal thyroglobulin + primitive-appearing thyroid follicles, fetal-type glands, and by primitive small round to oval cells, arranged into irregularly communicating solid aggregates and sheets with foci of necrosis and with an important mitotic activity. These components are bordered by a variably cellular primitive spindle cell stroma arranged into fascicles. These cells are usually positive for smooth muscle actin and may show focal positivity for desmin and myogenin. The small cells form focal periglandular cuffs. Foci of cartilage are seen in half of cases, but well-differentiated adult-type organoid structures, teratomatous components as pilosebaceous elements and skin adnexa are absent. The primitive small cell component express SALL4 but not OCT3/4 or PLAP [23, 33, 35, 36].
The detection of the germline mutation in DICER1 allowed the identification of neoplasms and persist to recognize a number seemingly unrelated extrapulmonary neoplasms. DICER1 has also allowed us to identify histopathologic features of several overlapping morphologic characteristics of distinct entities.
The pathologists play an important role in identifying DICER1 mutation-related lesions. The characteristic thyroid findings should alert the pathologist of a familial DICER1-associated neoplasm. The pathologist should advise an appropriate testing on the tumor examined and should alert the clinician about a concern for a DICER1 mutation-related disease.
Question 3: How Are the Familial Non-medullary Thyroid Carcinoma Classified in the New WHO?
Familial non-medullary thyroid carcinoma is extensively reviewed in the new 2022 WHO classification of endocrine and neuroendocrine tumors. This classification confirmed two large groups for familial thyroid cancer: (1) syndromic familial follicular cell-derived thyroid carcinoma and (2) non-syndromic familial follicular cell-derived thyroid carcinoma [37,38,39].
Syndromic familial follicular cell-derived thyroid carcinoma (SFNMTC) is a heterogeneous group of follicular cell-derived thyroid carcinomas that occur in families with a predominance of non-thyroid cancer [39,40,41,42]. SFNMTC includes PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome (PHTS) [43, 44], familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) [45], DICER1 syndrome [21], Carney complex (CNC) [46], and Werner syndrome (WS) [47] (Table 2). In SFNMTC, most of the clinical manifestations of non-thyroid lesions predominate and the genetic basis has been well established.
PHTS is mostly due to germline mutations in the PTEN gene [44, 48]. The mutations can also occur in the PIK3CA, AKT1, SEC23B, or SDH [49, 50] genes or due to germline KLL methylation epimutation [50].
FAP cases are caused by germline mutations in the APC gene [51, 52]. DICER1 syndrome is associated with heterozygous germline DICER1 pathogenic variants that cause loss of function [53,54,55].
CNC is caused by germline inactivating mutations of the PRKAR1A gene [46] and less commonly of the PRKACB gene [56], although a locus at 2p16 has also been identified in some cases of CNC without a PRKAR1A mutation [57].
WS is due to mutations in the WRN gene [58].
In patients with SFNMTC, the thyroid gland is usually multinodular with the presence of multiple, bilateral follicular cell nodules accompanying the thyroid carcinoma [42]. In addition, the histological pattern of the cribriform morular thyroid carcinoma (Fig. 5) associated with the characteristic nuclear and cytoplasmic positivity for β-catenin present in these tumors in FAP [52, 59], with the morular component staining for CD5 and CK5.
It has been well known that in the PHTS tumors, as tricholemmomas, gastrointestinal polyps, adult Lhermitte-Duclos disease/dysplastic gangliocytoma, and distinct thyroid nodules [60], loss of immunohistochemical expression of the PTEN protein is highly indicative of PHTS [39, 61].
Non-syndromic familial follicular cell-derived thyroid carcinoma (NSFNMTC) is a heterogeneous group of inherited thyroid cancer that occurs in families in which follicular cell-derived thyroid cancer is the predominant cancer. The genetic alterations of NSFNMTC are also heterogeneous and poorly understood, involving several candidate genes (and loci), some of which need to be confirmed [39, 42]. In most cases, these data are consistent with an autosomal dominant monogenic inheritance [39, 42], but a polygenic inheritance model has also been described [62].
NSFNMTC has been clinically defined in the WHO classification: (a) by the presence of follicular cell derived thyroid carcinoma in at least three first-degree relatives, or (b) by the existence of papillary thyroid carcinoma in two or more first-degree relatives, always in both cases, in the absence of a history of previous radiation and inherited cancer syndrome (Table 3). In these patients, the thyroid gland generally simulates a multinodular goiter macroscopically due to the frequent multicentricity and bilaterality of the thyroid carcinoma (usually papillary carcinoma) and to the association with hyperplastic nodules and adenomas [39, 42].
It is hoped that the clinical criteria established in this new WHO classification will facilitate the investigation of the genetic bases of NSFNMTC.
Question 4: What Are the Thyroid Pathology Findings in DICER 1 Syndrome?
The accepted definition of DICER1 syndrome at the 2022 WHO classification of tumor is an autosomal dominant tumor predisposition syndrome caused by heterozygous germline pathogenic variants in DICER1. It is characterized by increased incidence of benign and malignant lesions involving multiple organ systems, including pleuropulmonary blastoma, cystic nephroma, ovarian Sertoli-Leydig cell tumor, embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma of the uterine cervix and endocrine-related lesions such as multiple benign and malignant thyroid neoplasms, and pituitary blastoma.
Most patients with DICER1-related thyroid disease [23], feature MNG that consists of multiple benign follicular nodules with variable architecture and subtle atypia, or follicular adenomas including those with intrafollicular centripetal papillary growth [24, 25, 27, 42]. Early-onset, familial, or male MNG should prompt consideration of the presence of DICER1 syndrome.
Multinodular thyroid findings associated with DICER1 syndrome shows characteristic multiple and bilateral nodules of follicular proliferations, as adenomatous nodules and macrofollicular-pattern nodules, well-circumscribed adenomas, and/or nodules displaying intrafollicular centripedal papillary growth (so-called papillary hyperplasia or papillary adenoma) without nuclear features of papillary thyroid carcinoma [24].
A high frequency of involutional change in the non-tumorous thyroid parenchyma, characterized by dilated macro-follicles, in the absence of subclinical or even clinical hyperthyroidism is a characteristic finding present in DICER1-related thyroid disease. The identification of variable involutional changes in the non-nodular thyroid parenchyma should raise suspicion of DICER1-related pathogenesis [24, 42].
Careful microscopic examination of thyroid nodules and examination of the non-lesional thyroid parenchyma offers further suspicions to the possibility of DICER1-related thyroid disease, as the gross findings are indistinguishable from multinodular hyperplasia [23].
Multifocal follicular cell proliferations with intrafollicular centripetal papillary projections, also known as papillary adenoma, are characteristic of this syndrome.
Persons with DICER1 syndrome have a 16-fold increased risk of thyroid cancer compared with the SEER rates [63]. The diagnosis of malignancy is restricted to tumors with invasive growth and is enriched in low-risk follicular-patterned DTCs [24, 28, 29, 42]. Germline DICER1 mutations are associated with an increased risk of developing familial DTC. Pediatric FTCs have distinct genomic alterations and pathogenesis compared with adults, particularly those characterized by DICER1 variants and should be considered in pediatric FTCs, especially in younger patients < 10 years of age.
Most carcinomas are well differentiated (usually classic, follicular variant or solid/trabecular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma) [25, 64], but rare cases of poorly (high grade) differentiated carcinoma have been described [27]. The diagnosis of multinodular goiter with involutional changes, with or without differentiated thyroid carcinoma or poorly differentiated carcinoma in childhood or adolescence, should raise suspicion of DICER1 syndrome.
Childhood- and adolescent-onset neoplasms, as poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma (PDTC) are genetically distinct from adult-onset PDTC in that they are strongly associated with DICER1 mutations and may herald DICER1 syndrome in a minority. PDTCs arising in childhood or adolescence are less common [27].
Thyroblastoma, a rare DICER1 gene-related primitive neoplasm, shows primitive microfollicular structure surrounded by primitive spindle cells rarely with heterologous elements, and likely arise due to somatic mutations in the DICER1 gene [33, 35].
The occurrence of a thyroid malignancy occurring in a younger patient, particularly if poorly differentiated or a macrofollicular variant of FTC should be considered as a clue of DICER1 involvement [26,27,28,29]. Early-onset, familial, or male multinodular hyperplasia should prompt careful personal and family history focused on DICER1-associated tumors.
Question 5: The Familial Cancer Syndrome That Is Expanding on Its Recognition and on the Molecular Findings and These Tumors Are About Half of All Genetic Cases: Describe the Syndrome
SDH-deficient tumor syndromes are a group of syndromes characterized by succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)-deficient neoplasia, usually associated with pathogenic germline sequence variants in one of the SDH genes, which encodes the subunits of succinate dehydrogenase (SDHA, SDHB, SDHC, SDHD, SDHAF2) or with epimutation (promoter hypermethylation) of the SDHC gene.
A succinate dehydrogenase-deficient neoplasm refers to any tumor that shows loss of immunohistochemical expression of SDHB which serves as a marker of dysfunction of the SDH complex (also known as the mitochondrial complex 2), first demonstrated in 2005 [65] and the findings later confirmed [66, 67]. Although sporadic disease may rarely occur, most cases of SDH-deficient neoplasia arise in the syndromic setting, and therefore the occurrence of any SDH-deficient neoplasm is considered prima facie evidence of syndromic disease. Molecular mechanisms of the SDH-deficient tumor syndromes include germline mutations of one of the SDH genes encoding the subunits of succinate dehydrogenase (SDHA, SDHB, SDHC, SDHD, SDHAF2) or epimutation (promoter hypermethylation) of the SDHC gene.
One major change in classification of the SDH-deficient tumor syndromes in the fifth edition blue book relates to use of the term “Carney triad.” Carney triad was previously defined clinically as the association of SDH-deficient GIST, SDH-deficient paraganglioma, and pulmonary chondroma. Now the term Carney triad is restricted to syndromic SDH-deficient neoplasia where no underlying germline mutation is identified. Using this definition most cases of Carney triad are associated with promoter hypermethylation (epimutation) of the SDHC gene, although it is accepted that there will be some cases associated with germline mutation where the mutation is not identified by current methods.
There are some genotype–phenotype correlations so that different genes are more commonly associated with certain tumor combinations and locations. These correlations are summarized in Tables 4 and 5. Briefly, SDHB mutations are more common in intra-abdominal extra-adrenal paragangliomas and/or metastatic paraganglioma, while mutations in the SDHD gene are more frequent in paragangliomas of the head and neck [67]. SDHA mutation is particularly associated with SDH-deficient GIST (30% of cases), as is SDHC mutation (50% of cases) [68,69,70]. SDHB mutation accounts for the great majority of SDH deficient renal carcinomas [71, 72] which are only rarely associated with SDHC or SDHA mutation and virtually never with SDHD mutations. Pulmonary chondromas are very rare outside the setting of Carney triad. In addition to loss of SDHA expression, tumors with biallelic inactivation of SDHA also show SDHA loss [73, 74].
SDHB and SDHA immunohistochemistry may be difficult to interpret in some cases, and a tumor should only be considered deficient if there is preserved expression in non-neoplastic cells which act as internal controls (Fig. 6).
About half of all syndromic phaeochromocytomas/paragangliomas are SDH-deficient. There are subtle, but inconsistent morphological clues to the diagnosis of SDH-deficient paraganglioma including well-formed, rounded nests of epithelioid cells, often with focally clear or vacuolated cytoplasm (Fig. 6a). [75]. SDH-deficient GISTs almost only every arise in the stomach and are characterized by multifocality, a plexiform/multinodular growth pattern, epithelioid cell type predominance, a subtle nested architecture, and frequent lymph node metastasis [67, 68, 76, 77]. Although they lack KIT or PDGFRA mutation, SDH-deficient GISTs show diffuse strong immunohistochemical expression of both KIT and DOG1 [67, 68, 77].
SDH-deficient renal carcinomas are now recognized as a distinct entity (Fig. 6b) [71, 72, 78,79,80]. Although variant morphology is increasingly recognized [71], the majority of SDH-deficient renal carcinomas show characteristic morphology being comprised of compact nests of bland cells with eosinophilic, but not oncocytic, cytoplasm. A characteristic, but inconstant feature of SDH-deficient renal carcinoma is the presence of cytoplasmic inclusions containing eosinophilic or bubbly pale material [71, 72, 78,79,80]. Tumor necrosis, nuclear atypia and variant morphologies signify higher grade transformation and are associated with worse prognosis [71].
There is less experience with SDH-deficient PitNETs/pituitary adenomas, but they may be more frequently prolactin producing [67, 81,82,83,84]. SDH-deficient pulmonary chondromas are distinguished from chondroid hamartomas by their smooth contour, and lack of mesenchymal elements such as fat or smooth muscle. SDHB IHC may be a less reliable marker of SDH-deficient pulmonary chondromas [67, 85].
In the era of widespread molecular testing performed to assess a range of malignancies, it is important to recognized that germline pathogenic variants in SDHA are relatively common and in some populations have been reported to be found in about 0.3% of unselected individuals [73], yet demonstrate a very low lifetime penetrance (estimated as 1.7%) [86]. Therefore, if identified by large panel sequencing outside the setting of SDH deficient neoplasia, SDHA germline variants may represent incidental findings of little clinical significance [73, 74].
Question 6: Immunohistochemistry Can Be a Reliable and Time-Saving Strategy in the Evaluation Germline Mutations in Patients with Familial Cancer Syndromes. What Are the Immunohistochemistry Markers That We Use Supporting the Diagnosis of a Familial Cancer Syndrome?
Immunohistochemistry has arisen as a cost-effective strategy in the evaluation either of somatic mutations in tumors and/or germline mutations in patients presenting with tumors associated with familial cancer predisposition syndromes [87]. The identification of at-risk kindreds enables screening and risk reduction approaches for patients with hereditary cancer predisposition syndromes. Immunohistochemistry markers are available for numerous familial cancer syndromes, including Carney Complex, cribriform-morular thyroid carcinoma in FAP, familial SDH-deficient pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma syndromes, medullary thyroid carcinoma and MEN2, MAX-related tumors (MEN5), hyperparathyroidism-jaw tumor syndrome, and glucagon cell hyperplasia and neoplasia. We summarize below the most useful markers used on the routine histopathology labs.
SDHB and SDHA Immunohistochemistry
Loss of immunohistochemical expression of SDHB is a marker of biallelic inactivation of any component of the SDH complex (that is SDHA, SDHB, SDHC, SDHD, or SDHAF2) [65,66,67,68, 75, 82, 88] and is also termed SDH deficiency. Because somatic mutations of the SDH genes are extremely rare outside the setting of germline mutation [89], SDH deficiency is prima facie evidence of an SDH-deficient tumor syndrome. In addition to showing loss of expression for SDHB, tumor associated with biallelic mutation of SDHA also show loss of expression for SDHA [73, 74].
Therefore, immunohistochemistry for SDHB is a cost-effective screening test for the SDH-deficient tumor syndromes (Fig. 6). However, SDHB immunohistochemistry does not replace genetic testing, as all presumptive syndromic cases should be confirmed with genetic testing. Furthermore, SDHB/A immunohistochemistry should be performed and interpreted with caution. True negative staining of SDHB/A requires the presence of an internal positive control in the non-neoplastic cells which should be distinctly granular and cytoplasmic (that is mitochondrial). In some case, the neoplastic cells demonstrate a diffuse cytoplasmic blush which contrasts with the darker and distinctly granular appearance of the staining in the internal controls. This pattern, which is commonly associated with SDHD mutation, should be correctly interpreted as being positive [67, 90] (Fig. 6).
Parafibromin Immunohistochemistry
Hyperparathyroidism jaw tumor (HPTJT) syndrome is an autosomal dominant disorder caused by germline mutation in the CDC73 gene which encodes the protein parafibromin. HPTJT syndrome presents with primary hyperparathyroidism usually due to a single parathyroid adenoma or carcinoma [91, 92]. Recurrent or new primary tumors occur with long-term follow-up in most patients [93,94,95,96].
Clinical clues to HPTJT syndrome include younger age of presentation (particularly if < 40 years), large tumors, and very high serum PTH and calcium [96,97,98,99,100]. Given its rarity in the general population parathyroid carcinoma is particularly common in patients with HPTJT and the lifetime risk approaches 15% [93, 95, 96, 98, 99, 101]. Therefore, the possibility of HPTJT syndrome should be considered in all patients with parathyroid carcinoma even in the absence of a family history [99, 102, 103].
Parathyroid tumors associated with biallelic CDC73 mutation/inactivation (with or without a germline mutation) are termed “parafibromin-deficient” [99]. Morphological clues include sheet-like growth, eosinophilic cytoplasm, perinuclear cytoplasmic clearing, nuclear enlargement occasionally with binucleation [91, 99] (Fig. 7a). Parafibromin is a difficult stain to perform and interpret, and it is emphasized that only nuclear expression of parafibromin is considered significant, and that for a tumor to be considered parafibromin-deficient, there should also be nuclear expression in non-neoplastic cells which act as an internal positive control [99, 102, 104]. It is emphasized that loss of immunohistochemical expression of parafibromin is seen in most, but not all, parafibromin-deficient parathyroid tumors (Fig. 7b) [87, 99, 102,103,104,105].
MAX Immunohistochemistry
At present, it appears that the overall utility of MAX immunohistochemistry in the pathology practice is limited and it is not recommended as a screening test of MAX mutation [15]. Some studies have suggested that loss of MAX immunoreactivity may occur only in MAX-related tumors carrying truncating mutations [7, 106]. However, MAX immunohistochemistry seems to have poor sensitivity and specificity as a marker of MAX mutation [107, 108].
PTEN Immunohistochemistry
PTEN is a tumor suppressor gene that maps to 10q23.3. PTEN regulates cell migration, cell growth, apoptosis, and cell cycle arrest. Lesional tissue in patients with Cowden syndrome (CS) has been found to have absent or decreased immunoexpression of PTEN.
Reduction or complete loss of PTEN expression in dysplastic gangliocytomas of cerebellum/adult Lhermitte-Duclos disease (LDD), a pathognomonic finding for Cowden syndrome, was demonstrated in 2003 [109]. Loss of PTEN expression in hamartomatous polyps from patients with CS was also confirmed [110].
Characteristic pathologic findings in thyroidectomy specimens suggestive of CS include multiple adenomatous nodules, follicular adenomas, associated with nodular hyperplasia, follicular carcinoma, and/or papillary thyroid carcinoma. Loss of PTEN expression in adenomatous thyroid nodules (Fig. 8), as well and in the thyroid carcinoma, whether in all nodules or in a subset of nodules, appears to be both sensitive and specific for CS. Loss of PTEN expression in adenomatous nodules (either in all nodules or heterogeneous) has been confirmed in thyroid lesions of patients with CS [39, 43, 60, 87].
Other Familial Thyroid Carcinomas
The functional study of some cases of NSFNMTC has evidenced immunohistochemical overexpression of HABP2, EGFR, phospholipase C beta 1, and NOP53 in thyroid carcinomas associated with pathogenic germline variants of the HABP2, BROX, PLCB1, and NOP53 genes, respectively [111,112,113,114]. Although these immunohistochemical data could possibly help the pathologist in screening for this type of tumors, some of these susceptibility genes and immunohistochemical data still need to be confirmed.
Question 7: What Familial Cancer Syndrome Involves the Parathyroid Gland?
Familial cancer syndromes involving the parathyroid gland include MEN1, MEN2, HPT-JT, and MEN4. In MEN1, primary hyperparathyroidism is the most common feature, occurring in virtually all individuals with MEN1. The parathyroid disease in MEN1 usually involves multiple glands but can be asymmetrical and may occur in an asynchronous manner [115,116,117]. Historically, the term “parathyroid hyperplasia” has been used for this multiglandular disease, but it is now known that the lesions are composed of multiple monoclonal proliferations now referred to as multiglandular parathyroid disease or multiple multiglandular microadenomas [118]. Histologically, the parathyroids are hypercellular, may show nodular proliferations of predominantly chief cells but other cell types can be seen, and often lack a normal or atrophic appearing rim of non-lesional parathyroid tissue. MEN1-associated parathyroid disease generally behaves in a benign manner, and parathyroid carcinoma is are very rare in MEN1 [119].
Although MEN2 is characterized by medullary thyroid carcinoma and often associated with pheochromocytoma, parathyroid involvement occurs in approximately 3–35% of individuals with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A (MEN2A) [120]. Primary hyperparathyroidism is the first manifestation of MEN2A in less than 1% of cases [121]. Parathyroid disease is not a component of MEN2B. Parathyroid disease in MEN2A occurs a single gland disease often regarded as adenoma and as multiglandular disease. The multi glandular disease historically has been regarded as “hyperplasia,” but multiglandular disease in the setting of multiple endocrine neoplasia is more likely to represent multiple parathyroid neoplasms.
In HPT-JT, the parathyroid disease is the main and often the only feature of this disorder [93, 96, 99]. However, other tumors can occur including those involving the jaw and rarely tumors of the kidney and uterus [97, 122,123,124]. HPT-JT is an autosomal dominant disorder caused by heterozygous pathogenic germline sequence variants or deletions in the CDC73 gene. CDC73 is a tumor suppressor gene that encodes the protein parafibromin [101, 103, 125]. Individuals with HPT-JT generally present with primary hyperparathyroidism involving a single gland in most cases [91, 92]. Although with extended follow-up, metachronous tumors can occur [95]. With single gland involvement being the most common presentation of primary hyperparathyroidism in HPT-JT, most of the lesions identified are adenomas. However, in HPT-JT the lifetime risk of parathyroid carcinoma is up to 15% [98, 101]. Because parathyroid carcinoma is very uncommon, individuals diagnosed with parathyroid carcinoma are evaluated for the possibility of an underlying germline CDC73 alteration–which is found in up to 30% of what were thought to be sporadic parathyroid carcinomas [99, 102, 103, 126, 127]. Although a variety of biomarkers may be used in the evaluation of parathyroid glands, parafibromin may be one of the most useful. Parathyroid tumors associated with biallelic CDC73 inactivation show complete nuclear loss of parafibromin in all neoplastic cells and are regarded as “parafibromin-deficient” (Fig. 7b) [99, 104, 128, 129]. However, the presence of parafibromin does not rule out the possibility of HPT-JT as point mutations of CDC73 can result in preserved parafibromin expression [95, 102]. Most parafibromin deficient parathyroid tumors are associated with germline CDC73 inactivation, but biallelic somatic only mutations do occur [99]. Regardless, the finding of a parafibromin-deficient parathyroid neoplasm is an indication for long-term follow-up and underlying genetic testing [99].
Question 8: What Familial Cancer Syndrome Involves the Paraganglia and Adrenal Medulla?
Pheochromocytoma occurs in approximately 50% of individuals with MEN2 [130, 131]. Paragangliomas (extra-adrenal pheochromocytoma) can occur in MEN2, but they are quite rare–approximately 1%–and may occur after a diagnosis of MEN2 [130]. Metastatic disease is very infrequent (0–3%) with pheochromocytomas in MEN2 [130, 132, 133]. Although individuals with MEN2 may present with pheochromocytoma (15%), these tumors are more often diagnosed either simultaneously (30%) with medullary thyroid carcinoma or after (55%) diagnosis of medullary thyroid carcinoma [130]. The pheochromocytomas symptomatic at diagnosis in 50–69% [130, 133]. In a large multinational study of 1210 individuals with MEN2, 563 had pheochromocytoma, 44% of which had bilateral disease and 56% had unilateral pheochromocytoma at presentation of the pheochromocytoma [130]. Thirty percent of those with unilateral pheochromocytoma subsequently developed a contralateral pheochromocytoma in a mean of 9 years [130].
In the large multinational study of 563 individuals with MEN2 with pheochromocytoma, the mean age at diagnosis of the first pheochromocytoma was 45 years for those with RET mutation involving exon 10 (codon 609, 611, 618, 620), 37 years for those involving exon 11 (codon 634), and 27 years for those involving exon 16 (codon 918) [130]. Of individuals with pheochromocytoma in this large study, 84% of the pheochromocytomas were identified in individuals with RET mutation involving codon 634 [130]. In a study from Japan, all individuals with pheochromocytomas occurring in the setting of MEN2 with a RET mutation involving code on 918 developed pheochromocytoma by age 56 years, while the penetrance of pheochromocytoma was 25% by age 30 years, 52% by age 50 years, and 88% by age 77 years in individuals with a codon 634 mutation [134]. The penetrance pheochromocytoma in individuals with mutations involving codons other than 634 and 918 was 32% [134].
Unlike some other syndrome-associated pheochromocytomas, those in the setting of MEN2 histologically appear indistinguishable from sporadic pheochromocytomas. In the setting of MEN2, pheochromocytomas are often bilateral may be associated with adrenal medullary hyperplasia, or in this setting micro-pheochromocytomas–a clonal process. Composite pheochromocytomas can also be seen in MEN2 [135].
Pheochromocytomas, often bilateral and multifocal in one gland occur in the setting of MEN5 due to pathogenic MAX germline variants. The median age reported at pheochromocytoma occurrence is 34 years [6]. Extra-adrenal sympathetic paragangliomas, ganglioneuromas, neuroblastomas, and pituitary neuroendocrine tumors are also reported [15].
Question 9: What Are the New Findings Within the Classical Familial Cancer Syndromes?
MEN1 is characterized by primary hyperparathyroidism, the most common manifestation of MEN1 and is present in almost all individuals with MEN1. The parathyroid disease in MEN1 is multiglandular and can be asymmetrical and asynchronous [115,116,117, 136, 137]. Historically, the multiglandular disease in MEN1 has been referred to as parathyroid “hyperplasia.” However, recent genetic studies have shown the multiglandular parathyroid lesions in MEN1 are multiple monoclonal proliferations and regarded as multiple multiglandular adenomas [118]. Other tumors significantly associated with MEN1 include pituitary adenomas/pituitary neuroendocrine tumors and duodenum-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors [115,116,117]. In addition to these characteristic tumors, a variety of other endocrine and non-endocrine tumors can occur in the setting of MEN1 including bronchopulmonary neuroendocrine tumors, thymic neuroendocrine tumors, adrenal cortical carcinomas, pheochromocytomas, collagenomas, facial angiofibromas, leiomyomas, lipomas, leiomyomas, hibernomas, and breast cancers have also been described [138,139,140,141,142,143].
Increasing data of genotype–phenotype associations in the setting of MEN2 have led a greater understanding of the features of the disease is well as to improved prognostic risk classification [120]. Classic MEN2A, which accounts for approximately 95% of MEN2, is associated with medullary thyroid carcinoma (90%), pheochromocytoma (30%), and primary hyperparathyroidism (10%), while MEN2A with cutaneous lichen amyloidosis has slightly greater prevalence of MTC (95%), pheochromocytoma (50%), and primary hyperparathyroidism (15%), and MEN2A with Hirschsprung disease has slightly less prevalence of MTC (80%), pheochromocytoma (20%), and primary hyperparathyroidism (5%) [120]. In MEN2B, which accounts for approximately 5% of MEN2, has a prevalence of MTC of 100%, pheochromocytoma of 50%, ganglioneuromatosis of 100%, Marfanoid habitus 70%, corneal nerve hypertrophy 45%, and alacrima 40% [120]. RET germline variants are numerous, and not all are pathogenic. Numerous RET germline variants that continue to be reported often in association with hereditary medullary thyroid carcinoma must be carefully considered in this setting as it is much more complex than the conventional MEN2A (classic type, with Hirschsprung disease, with cutaneous lichen amyloid, and familial isolated medullary thyroid carcinoma) and MEN2B disease associated with RET mutation many pathologists learned about decades past in medical school. The classification and genotype–phenotype correlation is often looked at as medullary thyroid carcinoma risk groups with those carrying M918T mutations as being of highest risk well those with variants involving codon 634 and A883F as high risk, and those with variants involving codon 533, 609, 611, 618, 620, 630, 631, 666, 768, 790, 804, 891, and 912 as moderate risk [144]. However there remains significant variability both within a family and among families regarding the age of onset and aggressive miss of medullary thyroid carcinoma that is remains difficult to explain or predict with an individual [120].
Primary hyperparathyroidism is the characteristic feature of HPT-JT. Unlikely multiglandular parathyroid disease in MEN1, often there is only a single gland involvement in HPT-JT although additional tumors can occur with long-term follow-up [92, 93, 95, 96, 99]. What is particularly striking about the primary hyperparathyroidism in HPT-JT is the markedly increased incidence in parathyroid carcinoma occurring in up to 15% [98, 101]. HPT-JT is caused by germline sequence variants or deletions in the CDC73 gene, a tumor suppressor gene, that encodes the protein parafibromin [101, 103, 125]. A variety of biomarkers have been used in the evaluation of parathyroid glands, and recent work with the immunohistochemical marker parafibromin has shown utility both in raising the possibility of underlying CDC73 inactivation and diagnostically in diagnosing parathyroid carcinoma. Tumors with complete nuclear loss of parafibromin in all neoplastic cells are regarded as “parafibromin-deficient” (Fig. 7b) [99, 104, 128, 129]. Complete loss of nuclear parafibromin in all neoplastic cells is not definitive of an underlying CDC73 in activation as it can also be seen in rare biallelic somatic only mutations [99]. As 40–80% of sporadic parathyroid carcinomas have inactivating CDC73 mutations and frequent loss of heterozygosity of the CDC73 locus, complete loss of nuclear parafibromin immunoexppression in the tumor cells may be a supportive biomarker of malignancy in the appropriate setting [102, 104, 126, 127, 145,146,147]. As two thirds of parafibromin-deficient parathyroid tumors are associated with pathogenic germline CDC73 variants, so assessment for the likelihood of HPT-JT syndrome is recommended [99, 126, 127]. Recently, morphologic indications of a parathyroid-parafibromin-deficient tumor include a sheet-like growth, perinuclear cytoplasmic clearing, nuclear enlargement, eosinophilic cytoplasm, occasional multinucleated cells, and arborizing vasculature [91, 99]. Cystic change may also occur [93, 99, 101]. In addition to the parathyroid glands, other tumors occur in the setting of HPT-JT such as those involving the jaw, kidney, and uterus [97, 122,123,124]. Ossifying fibromas of the jaw, more often affecting the mandible than the maxilla, are often incidental findings in the setting of HPT-JT [124, 148]. Although historically it was thought that renal disease (cysts, adenomas, Wilms tumors, mixed epithelial and stromal tumors) was relatively common in HPT-JT, however clinically significant renal pathology is actually quite uncommon in HPT-JT [93, 95,96,97,98,99, 123, 149, 150]. Other than possibly uterine adenosarcomas, it is now thought that the amount of uterine pathology occurring in the setting of HPT-JT may be common benign disease simply found through screening [95, 97, 123].
Von Hippel Lindau (VHL) is a complex disease with types 1, 2A, 2B, and 2C having different manifestations and are associated with different genetic alterations the VHL gene. Manifestations of VHL include hemangioblastomas which occur in 80% of individuals with VHL and most often affect the cerebellum, followed by the spinal cord and brainstem, but can also affect the retina [151]. CNS hemangioblastomas are associated with bigger risk of death, while retinal hemangioblastomas are much less likely lethal but they are associated with blindness [152, 153]. Although renal cysts are common in VHL, 40% of individuals developed clear cell renal cell carcinoma which is often multicentric, bilateral, often cystic, and often low stage at diagnosis and may be associated with multiple small “clear cell tumorlets” in the renal parenchyma and renal cysts [154,155,156]. Rare clear cell papillary-like renal cell may also occur, but often lack the keratin 7 and CAIX immunopositivity of conventional clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma [155, 157]. The possibility of a progression in renal disease starting with renal cysts in the setting of VHL has been suggested. The pathogenesis of other manifestations of VHL occur continue to be studied including endolymphatic sac tumors [158, 159], pheochromocytomas and/or paragangliomas [160], pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, cysts and serous cystadenomas [161,162,163,164], neuroendocrine tumors of the ampulla, duodenum, gallbladder, and common bile duct [165, 166], epididymal papillary cystadenomas [167], and rarely papillary cystadenomas of the broad ligament and mesosalpinx [168, 169]. Screening to earlier detect malignancies may improve outcome, and clinical surveillance guidelines have been published [170, 171].
Neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) is characterized by multiple café au lait spots, axillary and inguinal freckling, multiple cutaneous neurofibromas, plexiform neurofibromas, Lisch nodules, optic nerve and other central nervous system gliomas, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors, phaeochromocytoma (adrenal paraganglioma), duodenal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, and choroidal freckling.
Duodenal NET in NF1 patients arise in association with the major or minor ampulla, show a tubular growth pattern and frequent psammoma-bodies [172]. In contrast to sporadic and MEN1 associated D-NET, a strong expression of Somatostatin is found [173, 174]. Co-occurrence with gangliocytic paragangliomas, adenoma/adenocarcinoma (MiNEN) and gastro-intestinal stromal tumors (GIST) are described [172, 175,176,177,178].
While NF1-associated pheochromocytomas may be bilateral, they do not differ from their non-familial counterparts harboring somatic NF1 mutations, which are found in about 20% of sporadic pheochromocytomas [179]. These pheochromocytomas are more frequently of composite type [180].
NF1-related pancreatic NET are indistinguishable from sporadic PanNET, and no microadenomatosis is described in contrast to MEN1 and VHL-associated familial PanNET.
Question 10: Which Endocrine Familial Cancer Syndromes Involves the Skin? Which Skin Lesions Can Be Identified on These Syndromes?
NF1
Neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1) is characterized by multiple café au lait spots, axillary and inguinal freckling, multiple cutaneous neurofibromas, plexiform neurofibromas, Lisch nodules, optic nerve and other central nervous system gliomas, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors, phaeochromocytoma (adrenal paraganglioma), duodenal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, and choroidal freckling.
Duodenal NET in NF1 patients arise in association with the major or minor ampulla, show a tubular growth pattern and frequent psammoma-bodies. In contrast to sporadic and MEN1 associated D-NET, a strong expression of Somatostatin is found [173, 174]. Co-occurrence with gangliocytic paragangliomas, adenoma/adenocarcinoma (MiNEN) and gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are described [172, 175,176,177,178].
While NF1-associated pheochromocytomas may be bilateral, they do not differ from their non-familial counterparts harboring somatic NF1 mutations, which are found in about 20% of sporadic pheochromocytomas [179]. These pheochromocytomas are more frequently of composite type [180].
NF1-related pancreatic NET are indistinguishable from sporadic PanNET, no microadenomatosis is described in contrast to MEN1 and VHL-associated familial PanNET.
PTEN-Hamartoma Tumor Syndrome
PHTS comprises diverse disorders caused by mutations in the phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) gene. PHTS patients have diverse presentations and various phenotypes. Cowden syndrome (CS) is the principal PTEN-related disorder. CS is characterized by multiple neoplasms and hamartomas, mucosal papillomatosis, and skin lesions, trichilemmomas [60]. Trichilemmomas are usually located in the mid-face and are multiple in this disease. Trichilemmomas and mucocutaneous papillomatous papules are one of the first signs of the disease.
According to the International Cowden Consortium operational diagnostic criteria [181], many skin lesions are considered as pathognomonic or a major criterion for diagnosis.
Pathognomonic criteria include adult Lhermitte-Duclos disease (cerebellar tumors), facial trichilemmomas, acral keratosis, papillomatous papules, and the known autism-spectrum disorder.
The major criteria include breast carcinoma, macrocephaly, endometrial carcinoma, multiple palmoplantar keratosis, macular pigmentation of the glans penis, multifocal cutaneous facial papules, and multiple gastrointestinal ganglioneuromas or hamartomas.
Minor criteria include single gastrointestinal hamartoma or ganglioneuroma, lipomas, fibromas, fibrocystic breast disease, renal cell carcinoma, genitourinary malformations, uterine fibroids, and intellectual disability (IQ ≤ 75).
Please note that non-medullary thyroid cancer is a major criteria and FTA and MNG are minor criteria.
MEN2
Cutaneous lichen amyloidosis is the most common cutaneous manifestation of MEN2A, including familial isolated medullary thyroid carcinoma. In individuals with MEN2A-associated cutaneous lichen amyloidosis, almost all RET mutations involve codon 634 [182], although families with involvement of other codons such as V804M [182, 183], S891A [182, 184], G513D [184], and C611Y [185] have been reported. Interestingly, a family with MEN2A with V804M mutation had individuals with dermal hyperneury, a cutaneous lesion more characteristic of MEN2B, and one family member had multiple sclerotic fibromas, a cutaneous feature seen in PTEN tumor syndrome [186].
MEN2A-related cutaneous lichen amyloid occurs more commonly in women with a mean age of 20 to 30 years but can occur individuals as young as 3 years of age [182, 187, 188]. In kindreds with cutaneous lichen amyloidosis, the skin lesion is a second most frequent manifestation–second only to medullary thyroid carcinoma and affecting approximately 51% of the individuals [182]. Additionally, the pruritus associated with cutaneous lichen amyloidosis and lichen amyloid itself may appear more than two decades before neoplastic disease in MEN2A and may be the first manifestation of MEN2A [182, 189]. The relationship between MEN2A and cutaneous lichen amyloid remains unclear. MEN2A-associated cutaneous lichen amyloidosis usually affects the interscapular of the back. The cutaneous lichen amyloidosis are pruritic and may appear as multiple infiltrated papules which can be overlying plaques [190]. The pruritis is thought to result in scratching and subsequent epidermal hyperplasia, keratinocytes damage with deposition of keratin positive material in the dermis in continuity with the dermal epidermal junction [182]. Unlike the amyloid in the thyroid associated with medullary thyroid carcinoma which is calcitonin [191], the amyloid in cutaneous lichen amyloid in MEN2A is positive for keratin and negative for calcitonin [192].
Mucocutaneous neuromas are a manifestation of MEN2B, but they are not pathognomonic of MEN2B as they can be seen sporadically as well as in association with PTEN mutations on 10q23.31 [193]. Extra-endocrine features of MEN2B to be are important to recognize as they usually preceded a diagnosis of a neoplasm such as medullary thyroid carcinoma or pheochromocytoma [133, 194]. A recent retrospective, multi center, international study of individuals with M918T RET mutation found all 287 with available data had at least one extra-endocrine feature of disease [133]. Neuromas and ganglioneuromas often affect the intestines but also frequently involved the tongue (62%), lips (53%), and eyelid or conjunctiva (19%) [120, 133]. Mucosal neuromas may be the first manifestation of MEN2B. Individuals with mutations of M918T, A883F, and double RET germline variants can all be associated with extra-endocrine manifestations of MEN2B [120].
The histologic features of mucosal neuromas can appear like that of a solitary neuroma or may appear as irregular hyperplastic nerves with a thickened perineurium. The term dermal hyperneury is a type of small nerve hypertrophy with prominent dermal nerve fibers that are enlarged in size. This can occur sporadically as a cell lesion or with multiple lesions in can occur with syndromes, particularly MEN2B [195, 196]. Dermal hyperneury has also been identified in normal appearing skin in individuals with MEN2B [195]. The skin shows an increase in organized nerve tissue, with aggregated nerve fascicles or trunks containing parallel masses of spindle cells and nerve fibers [195]. The fascicles are enlarged in size and more frequent in number [195].
Question 11: What Is the Role of the Pathologist in Diagnosing Syndromic Familial Non-medullary Thyroid Carcinoma?
Syndromic familial non-medullary thyroid carcinoma (SFNMTC) is defined in the new 2022 WHO classification as a heterogeneous group of familial follicular cell-derived carcinomas with a predominance of non-thyroid cancer. SFNMTC is a good example of how the advancement of molecular biology has made it possible to establish genotype–phenotype correlations that can be useful for the pathologist in daily practice [39, 42]. SFNMTC includes PHTS [44], FAP [45], DICER1 syndrome [21], CNC [46] and WS [47] (Table 2). The pathologist should be aware of the characteristics of these syndromes, which include extrathyroid neoplasms, some of which given their rarity, could alert to the hereditary basis of the disease [39, 42]. In all these syndromes, thyroid gland involvement is typically multinodular and both lobes are affected [39, 42].
In PHTS (Cowden syndrome, Cowden disease, and Bannayan-Riley-Ruvalcaba syndrome) [44], the thyroid gland is characteristically multinodular showing multiple, bilateral, well-defined, and/or encapsulated follicular cell micro- and macroscopic nodules [41, 43, 197,198,199,200,201,202,203]. Several adenomatous nodules called “microadenomas” coexist with follicular cell derived carcinoma and support an adenoma-carcinoma pathogenetic sequence [37, 197, 200]. Thyroid cancer is mainly papillary thyroid carcinoma (both classic and follicular variants) and follicular thyroid carcinoma [37, 197, 201]. Lipoadenomas (adenolipomas) are common [197, 201]; trabecular-like growth patterns as well as clear and oncocytic cells have also been described [43, 197, 202, 203]. Adipose infiltration and thyroiditis are also typical [197, 198, 203]. In some cases of PHTS, there is thyroiditis and C-cell hyperplasia, but there is no increased risk of medullary carcinoma [202,203,204]. The immunohistochemical determination of the PTEN protein is a good diagnostic tool since its negativity in the nodules or in a subset of nodules (Fig. 8), while preserving positivity in the endothelial cells (positive controls), is an indicator which is both sensitive and specific for PHTS [39, 42, 61, 201].
Cribriform morular thyroid carcinoma (CMTC) occurs in about 16% of patients with FAP [205]. While sporadic CMTC usually presents macroscopically as a single nodule, the cases associated with FAP are usually multifocal and bilateral [52, 59, 206, 207]. Macroscopically, CMTC is well delimited, encapsulated and/or partially lobed by fibrosis bands. Histologically, there is a variable proportion of cribriform, papillary, follicular, solid, trabecular, and morular growth patterns [52, 59, 207, 208]. The cribriform patterned areas lack fibrous stroma, the follicular structures lack colloid and the papillae are lined by cuboidal or tall cells. Spindle cell trabecular areas may adopt a hyalinizing trabecular tumor-like pattern. Squamous morulae lack keratinization and show occasional nuclei with peculiar chromatin clearance (rich in biotin). Strong nuclear and cytoplasmic staining for beta-catenin is the characteristic finding of CMTC (Fig. 9) [42, 52, 59, 208]. Tumor cells are also positive for TTF1 (clones 8G3G7/1 and SPT24), epithelial membrane antigen, pankeratins (AE1/AE3), vimentin, estrogen, and progesterone receptors, and negative for keratin 20, calcitonin, and WT1 [52, 59]. Thyroglobulin is negative and the PAX8 (clone BC12 or polyclonal antisera) shows focal or negative staining in the CMTC [52, 59]. Morulae are positive for beta-catenin, keratin 5, CD10, CDX2, CD5, and CA19.9, but negative for TTF1, PAX8, E-cadherin, and estrogen and progesterone receptors [52, 59]. Although CMTC generally has a good prognosis, some high-grade tumors showing necrosis, high mitotic index, Ki-67 of 15–60%, neuroendocrine differentiation and/or TERT promoter mutations have behaved aggressively [209,210,211,212,213].
In patients with DICER1 syndrome, the thyroid gland is multinodular due to multiple benign (multinodular goiter) and malignant nodules [24, 25]. There are nodules with intrafollicular centripetal papillary pattern of growth, adenomatous nodules and involutional changes [24, 25]. The presence of cells with “intermediate” nuclei is common and in papillary patterned areas especially should not lead to a false diagnosis of papillary thyroid carcinoma. The majority of the carcinomas are the typical well differentiated thyroid carcinomas (usually classic, follicular variant or solid/trabecular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma) [25, 64], but rare cases of poorly (high grade) differentiated carcinoma have been described [27]. The diagnosis of multinodular goiter with involutional changes, with or without differentiated thyroid carcinoma or poorly differentiated carcinoma in childhood or adolescence, should raise suspicion of DICER1 syndrome. Thyroblastoma, a rare neoplasm composed of primitive follicular cells surrounded by a small cell component and mesenchymal stroma with heterologous elements, should also raise suspicion of DICER1 syndrome [33, 35].
The thyroid gland in CNC is multinodular due to the presence of encapsulated and non-encapsulated follicular cell proliferations [214,215,216,217]. This “follicular adenomatosis” [213] or multiple adenomatous nodules, involves the entire gland in a manner equivalent to the multiple adenomatous nodules or microadenomas described in PHTS. Some follicular adenomas with intrafollicular centripetal papillary growth pattern can cause hyperthyroidism (“toxic” adenoma); oncocytic (Hürthle cell) adenomas have also been described [215]. The incidence of thyroid cancer (both papillary and follicular types) [214,215,216, 218] is around 15% [216], and these malignant tumors are not morphologically different from their sporadic counterpart.
In WS, the risk of thyroid involvement by cancer is estimated to be around 18%. The predominant thyroid cancer is follicular thyroid carcinoma, followed by papillary thyroid carcinoma and anaplastic thyroid carcinoma [219]. The benign follicular thyroid adenoma is also seen in these patients. Interestingly, anaplastic thyroid carcinoma presents clinically at younger ages than sporadic anaplastic thyroid carcinoma, reflecting the premature biological aging associated with this syndrome [42].
Although an unusual “villous” papillary thyroid has been described present in a patient with Marfan syndrome [220], the usefulness of this “villous” pattern for the recognition of Marfan syndrome needs confirmation.
The pathologist usually has an important role when facing these morphological and/or immunohistochemical clues and alert clinicians to the possibility of these inherited syndromes, which must be genetically confirmed. Identifying these syndromes will facilitate cancer screening, genetic counseling, and appropriate treatment. In fact, total thyroidectomy is usually recommended in these cases due to the multicentricity of the lesions and the risk of progression to carcinoma [39, 41, 42, 197, 199].
Question 12: How Does the 2022 WHO Classification Approach Non-syndromic Familial Non-medullary Thyroid Carcinoma?
The new 2022 WHO classification of thyroid tumors defines the NSFNMTC as a heterogeneous group of hereditary thyroid cancers that encompasses a variety of familial tumor syndromes characterized by a predominance of follicular cell-derived carcinomas or non-medullary thyroid carcinomas.
NSFNMTC has a prevalence ranging from 4.5 to 10% depending on the criteria of different series [221,222,223,224,225], reaching up to 13.5% in some areas with less diversity of population [226]. NSFNMTC has a heterogeneous and poorly understood genetic basis, with most pedigrees supporting a monogenic and autosomal dominant mode of inheritance with reduced penetrance and variable expressiveness [39, 42, 227]; a polygenic mode of inheritance has also recently been proposed however [62] (Table 6). NSFNMTC shares the same somatic mutations [224, 228,229,230,231,232,233] and signaling pathways (MAPK/ERK and PI3K/AKT) [234] as its sporadic counterpart, which fits in with the absence of both cytological and histopathological differences between NSFNMTC and sporadic carcinomas. There are, however, certain clinico-pathological features that may suggest the familial character of NSFNMTC [39, 42]. Patients with familial thyroid cancer are generally diagnosed on an average of 5 years earlier (≈ 43 years) than patients with sporadic carcinomas [221, 224, 235,236,237,238]. Furthermore, each new generation is diagnosed at an earlier age [225, 239], although a bias due to the greater number of examinations in these families has been proposed to explain this clinical anticipation [240]. The frequent multicentricity, bilaterality and/or association of NSFNMTC with benign nodules is also characteristic and can clinically (and grossly) simulate a multinodular goiter in its presentation [39, 42].
Microscopically, most NSFNMTCs are papillary thyroid carcinomas, including cases measuring ≤ 1 cm in diameter, classical, follicular and other variants of papillary carcinoma; other types of differentiated thyroid carcinoma, including oncocytic variants, have also been reported (Table 6). Typically, tumor multifocality combined with a background of hyperplastic nodules, follicular adenomas and Hashimoto's thyroiditis should alert to their possible hereditary nature [39, 42]. Additionally, the coexistence of NSFNMTC with multiple benign follicular nodules is consistent with a sequential tumorigenic model [227, 235]. Patients with germline PLCB1 mutation usually present with multinodular goiter of adolescent onset and increased risk of progression to papillary thyroid carcinoma [113, 241]. Interestingly, this form of multinodular goiter is characterized by the presence of multiple well-defined nodules with a micropapillary pattern (papillary adenomata) on a normal-appearing thyroid background, in contrast with the diffuse involvement of conventional multinodular goiter [241, 242].
The functional study of some cases of NSFNMTC has evidenced immunohistochemical overexpression of HABP2, EGFR, phospholipase C beta 1, and NOP53 in thyroid carcinomas associated with pathogenic germline variants of the HABP2, BROX, PLCB1, and NOP53 genes, respectively [111,112,113,114]. Lower immunostaining for CHEK2 protein in thyroid tumors has also been detected in patients with CHEK2 gene mutations [231]. Although these immunohistochemical data could possibly help the pathologist in screening for this type of tumors, some of these susceptibility genes and immunohistochemical data still need to be confirmed.
Given the absence of specific microscopic features in NSFNMTC in most cases; the familial papillary thyroid carcinoma-renal cell carcinoma show some specific features of these thyroid carcinomas (Fig. 10), the new 2022 WHO classification of thyroid tumors has established as essential clinical criteria for the diagnosis and identification of NSFNMTC: (a) the presence of a follicular cell-derived thyroid carcinoma appearing in at least 3 first-degree relatives, or (b) the presence of papillary thyroid carcinoma in 2 or more first-degree relatives. In both cases, always in the absence of previous known ionizing radiation exposure and other cancer syndromes (Table 3). Although the second criterion is less selective, this approach could avoid the loss of hereditary cases which could benefit from more appropriate treatment [226, 235, 236, 238].
Conclusions
The prior WHO Classification of Tumors of the Endocrine Organs, edited in 2017, covered a specific section on familial cancer syndromes. That section contained chapters on 12 syndromes associated with endocrine tumors.
With the rapidly increasing use of molecular genetic techniques including next-generation sequencing (NGS) in both diagnostic pathology and molecular and clinical genetics, numerous new constitutional gene mutations have been identified in tumors, resulting in clinically recognizable tumor-predisposing syndromes. Within the last few years, other three new syndromes involving the endocrine organs were recognized: MAFA-related insulinomatosis, MEN4, and MEN5. These familial cancer syndromes are associated with a range of benign and malignant neoplasms involving multiple organ systems and are not limited to the endocrine system.
The present 2022 WHO classification of tumors of endocrine organs now describes and gives updates on 15 syndromes associated with endocrine lesions and tumors (summarized on Table 7). Besides the addition of the newly discovered familial diseases, due to new genetic and molecular findings and clinical and pathological correlation, familial follicular cell-derived thyroid carcinoma or non-medullary thyroid carcinoma, is now accepted to be classified as syndromic and non-syndromic familial follicular cell-derived/non-medullary thyroid carcinoma. This topic is covered in 2 chapters that highlight the important role the pathologist plays in recognizing some of these diseases.
The addition on immunohistochemistry, as a reliable and time-saving approach in the assessment either somatic mutations in tumors and/or germline mutations in patients with familial cancer syndromes, has improved the pathologist’s ability to raise the possibility of dealing with a tumor as part of a familial cancer syndrome.
References
Couvelard A and Scoazec JY (2020) [Inherited tumor syndromes of gastroenteropancreatic and thoracic neuroendocrine neoplasms]. Ann Pathol 40:120-133 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annpat.2020.01.002
Alrezk R, Hannah-Shmouni F and Stratakis CA (2017) MEN4 and CDKN1B mutations: the latest of the MEN syndromes. Endocr Relat Cancer 24:T195-T208 https://doi.org/10.1530/ERC-17-0243
Slingerland J and Pagano M (2000) Regulation of the cdk inhibitor p27 and its deregulation in cancer. J Cell Physiol 183:10-7 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4652(200004)183:1<10::AID-JCP2>3.0.CO;2-I
Francis JM, Kiezun A, Ramos AH et al (2013) Somatic mutation of CDKN1B in small intestine neuroendocrine tumors. Nat Genet 45:1483-6 https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2821
Georgitsi M (2010) MEN-4 and other multiple endocrine neoplasias due to cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (p27(Kip1) and p18(INK4C)) mutations. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 24:425-37 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2010.01.001
Taieb D, Jha A, Guerin C et al (2018) 18F-FDOPA PET/CT Imaging of MAX-Related Pheochromocytoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 103:1574-1582 https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2017-02324
Burnichon N, Cascon A, Schiavi F et al (2012) MAX mutations cause hereditary and sporadic pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Clin Cancer Res 18:2828-37 https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-0160
Bausch B, Schiavi F, Ni Y et al (2017) Clinical Characterization of the Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma Susceptibility Genes SDHA, TMEM127, MAX, and SDHAF2 for Gene-Informed Prevention. JAMA Oncol 3:1204-1212 https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0223
Ferrara AM, Lombardi G, Pambuku A et al (2018) Temozolomide treatment of a malignant pheochromocytoma and an unresectable MAX-related paraganglioma. Anticancer Drugs 29:102-105 https://doi.org/10.1097/CAD.0000000000000570
Shibata M, Inaishi T, Miyajima N et al (2017) Synchronous bilateral pheochromocytomas and paraganglioma with novel germline mutation in MAX: a case report. Surg Case Rep 3:131 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40792-017-0408-x
Korpershoek E, Koffy D, Eussen BH et al (2016) Complex MAX Rearrangement in a Family With Malignant Pheochromocytoma, Renal Oncocytoma, and Erythrocytosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 101:453-60 https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2015-2592
Pozza C, Sesti F, Di Dato C et al (2020) A Novel MAX Gene Mutation Variant in a Patient With Multiple and "Composite" Neuroendocrine-Neuroblastic Tumors. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 11:234 https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.00234
Daly AF, Castermans E, Oudijk L et al (2018) Pheochromocytomas and pituitary adenomas in three patients with MAX exon deletions. Endocr Relat Cancer 25:L37-L42 https://doi.org/10.1530/ERC-18-0065
Roszko KL, Blouch E, Blake M et al (2017) Case Report of a Prolactinoma in a Patient With a Novel MAX Mutation and Bilateral Pheochromocytomas. J Endocr Soc 1:1401-1407 https://doi.org/10.1210/js.2017-00135
Seabrook AJ, Harris JE, Velosa SB et al (2021) Multiple Endocrine Tumors Associated with Germline MAX Mutations: Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 5? J Clin Endocrinol Metab 106:1163-1182 https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaa957
Grogan RH, Pacak K, Pasche L, Huynh TT and Greco RS (2011) Bilateral adrenal medullary hyperplasia associated with an SDHB mutation. J Clin Oncol 29:e200-2 https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2010.32.2156
Yagita M, Itoh K, Tsudo M et al (1989) Involvement of both Tac and non-Tac interleukin 2-binding peptides in the interleukin 2-dependent proliferation of human tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Cancer Res 49:1154-9
Anlauf M, Bauersfeld J, Raffel A et al (2009) Insulinomatosis: a multicentric insulinoma disease that frequently causes early recurrent hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia. Am J Surg Pathol 33:339-46 https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181874eca
Iacovazzo D, Flanagan SE, Walker E et al (2018) MAFA missense mutation causes familial insulinomatosis and diabetes mellitus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:1027-1032 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1712262115
Snaith JR, McLeod D, Richardson A, Chipps D (2020) Multifocal insulinoma secondary to insulinomatosis: persistent hypoglycaemia despite total pancreatectomy. Endocrinol Diabetes Metab Case Rep 2020 https://doi.org/10.1530/EDM-20-0091
Gonzalez IA, Stewart DR, Schultz KAP, Field AP, Hill DA and Dehner LP (2021) DICER1 tumor predisposition syndrome: an evolving story initiated with the pleuropulmonary blastoma. Mod Pathol https://doi.org/10.1038/s41379-021-00905-8
de Kock L, Wu MK and Foulkes WD (2019) Ten years of DICER1 mutations: Provenance, distribution, and associated phenotypes. Hum Mutat 40:1939-1953 https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.23877
Nose V (2020) DICER1 gene alterations in thyroid diseases. Cancer Cytopathol 128:688-689 https://doi.org/10.1002/cncy.22327
Wasserman JD, Sabbaghian N, Fahiminiya S et al (2018) DICER1 Mutations Are Frequent in Adolescent-Onset Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 103:2009-2015 https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2017-02698
Gullo I, Batista R, Rodrigues-Pereira P et al (2018) Multinodular Goiter Progression Toward Malignancy in a Case of DICER1 Syndrome: Histologic and Molecular Alterations. Am J Clin Pathol 149:379-386 https://doi.org/10.1093/ajcp/aqy004
Lee YA, Im SW, Jung KC et al (2020) Predominant DICER1 Pathogenic Variants in Pediatric Follicular Thyroid Carcinomas. Thyroid 30:1120-1131 https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2019.0233
Chernock RD, Rivera B, Borrelli N et al (2020) Poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma of childhood and adolescence: a distinct entity characterized by DICER1 mutations. Mod Pathol 33:1264-1274 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41379-020-0458-7
Bongiovanni M, Sykiotis GP, La Rosa S et al (2020) Macrofollicular Variant of Follicular Thyroid Carcinoma: A Rare Underappreciated Pitfall in the Diagnosis of Thyroid Carcinoma. Thyroid 30:72-80 https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2018.0607
Hellgren LS, Hysek M, Jatta K, Zedenius J and Juhlin CC (2021) Macrofollicular Variant of Follicular Thyroid Carcinoma (MV-FTC) with a Somatic DICER1 Gene Mutation: Case Report and Review of the Literature. Head Neck Pathol 15:668-675 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-020-01208-1
Scheithauer BW, Horvath E, Abel TW et al (2012) Pituitary blastoma: a unique embryonal tumor. Pituitary 15:365-73 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11102-011-0328-x
de Kock L, Sabbaghian N, Plourde F et al (2014) Pituitary blastoma: a pathognomonic feature of germ-line DICER1 mutations. Acta Neuropathol 128:111-22 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-014-1285-z
Scheithauer BW, Kovacs K, Horvath E et al (2008) Pituitary blastoma. Acta Neuropathol 116:657-66 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-008-0388-9
Rooper LM, Bynum JP, Miller KP et al (2020) Recurrent DICER1 Hotspot Mutations in Malignant Thyroid Gland Teratomas: Molecular Characterization and Proposal for a Separate Classification. Am J Surg Pathol 44:826-833 https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000001430
Miller DL, Thompson LDR, Bishop JA, Rooper LM and Ali SZ (2020) Malignant teratomas of the thyroid gland: clinico-radiologic and cytomorphologic features of a rare entity. J Am Soc Cytopathol 9:221-231 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasc.2020.04.008
Agaimy A, Witkowski L, Stoehr R et al (2020) Malignant teratoid tumor of the thyroid gland: an aggressive primitive multiphenotypic malignancy showing organotypical elements and frequent DICER1 alterations-is the term "thyroblastoma" more appropriate? Virchows Arch 477:787-798 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-020-02853-1
Yang J, Sarita-Reyes C, Kindelberger D and Zhao Q (2018) A rare malignant thyroid carcinosarcoma with aggressive behavior and DICER1 gene mutation: a case report with literature review. Thyroid Res 11:11 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13044-018-0055-8
Nose V (2011) Familial thyroid cancer: a review. Mod Pathol 24 Suppl 2:S19-33 https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2010.147
Nose V (2010) Familial follicular cell tumors: classification and morphological characteristics. Endocr Pathol 21:219-26 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12022-010-9135-6
Guilmette J and Nose V (2018) Hereditary and familial thyroid tumours. Histopathology 72:70-81 https://doi.org/10.1111/his.13373
Dotto J and Nose V (2008) Familial thyroid carcinoma: a diagnostic algorithm. Adv Anat Pathol 15:332-49 https://doi.org/10.1097/PAP.0b013e31818a64af
Nose V (2010) Thyroid cancer of follicular cell origin in inherited tumor syndromes. Adv Anat Pathol 17:428-36 https://doi.org/10.1097/PAP.0b013e3181f8b028
Cameselle-Teijeiro JM, Mete O, Asa SL and LiVolsi V (2021) Inherited Follicular Epithelial-Derived Thyroid Carcinomas: From Molecular Biology to Histological Correlates. Endocr Pathol 32:77-101 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12022-020-09661-y
Laury AR, Bongiovanni M, Tille JC, Kozakewich H and Nose V (2011) Thyroid pathology in PTEN-hamartoma tumor syndrome: characteristic findings of a distinct entity. Thyroid 21:135-44 https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2010.0226
Yehia L, Ngeow J and Eng C (2019) PTEN-opathies: from biological insights to evidence-based precision medicine. J Clin Invest 129:452-464 https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI121277
Dinarvand P, Davaro EP, Doan JV et al (2019) Familial Adenomatous Polyposis Syndrome: An Update and Review of Extraintestinal Manifestations. Arch Pathol Lab Med 143:1382-1398 https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2018-0570-RA
Bouys L and Bertherat J (2021) MANAGEMENT OF ENDOCRINE DISEASE: Carney complex: clinical and genetic update 20 years after the identification of the CNC1 (PRKAR1A) gene. Eur J Endocrinol 184:R99-R109 https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-20-1120
Oshima J, Martin GM and Hisama FM (1993) Werner Syndrome. GeneReviews((R))
Yehia L and Eng C (1993) PTEN Hamartoma Tumor Syndrome. GeneReviews((R))
Ni Y, He X, Chen J et al (2012) Germline SDHx variants modify breast and thyroid cancer risks in Cowden and Cowden-like syndrome via FAD/NAD-dependant destabilization of p53. Hum Mol Genet 21:300-10 https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddr459
Yehia L and Eng C (2020) PTEN hamartoma tumour syndrome: what happens when there is no PTEN germline mutation? Hum Mol Genet 29:R150-R157 https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddaa127
Groves C, Lamlum H, Crabtree M et al (2002) Mutation cluster region, association between germline and somatic mutations and genotype-phenotype correlation in upper gastrointestinal familial adenomatous polyposis. Am J Pathol 160:2055-61 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9440(10)61155-8
Cameselle-Teijeiro JM, Peteiro-Gonzalez D, Caneiro-Gomez J et al (2018) Cribriform-morular variant of thyroid carcinoma: a neoplasm with distinctive phenotype associated with the activation of the WNT/beta-catenin pathway. Mod Pathol 31:1168-1179 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41379-018-0070-2
Schultz KAP, Williams GM, Kamihara J et al (2018) DICER1 and Associated Conditions: Identification of At-risk Individuals and Recommended Surveillance Strategies. Clin Cancer Res 24:2251-2261 https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-3089
Herriges JC, Brown S, Longhurst M et al (2019) Identification of two 14q32 deletions involving DICER1 associated with the development of DICER1-related tumors. Eur J Med Genet 62:9-14 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.04.011
Canberk S, Ferreira JC, Pereira L et al (2021) Analyzing the Role of DICER1 Germline Variations in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma. Eur Thyroid J 9:296-303 https://doi.org/10.1159/000509183
Forlino A, Vetro A, Garavelli L et al (2014) PRKACB and Carney complex. N Engl J Med 370:1065-7 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1309730
Matyakhina L, Pack S, Kirschner LS et al (2003) Chromosome 2 (2p16) abnormalities in Carney complex tumours. J Med Genet 40:268-77 https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg.40.4.268
Yokote K, Chanprasert S, Lee L et al (2017) WRN Mutation Update: Mutation Spectrum, Patient Registries, and Translational Prospects. Hum Mutat 38:7-15 https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.23128
Boyraz B, Sadow PM, Asa SL, Dias-Santagata D, Nose V and Mete O (2021) Cribriform-Morular Thyroid Carcinoma Is a Distinct Thyroid Malignancy of Uncertain Cytogenesis. Endocr Pathol 32:327-335 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12022-021-09683-0
Nose V (2016) Genodermatosis Affecting the Skin and Mucosa of the Head and Neck: Clinicopathologic, Genetic, and Molecular Aspect--PTEN-Hamartoma Tumor Syndrome/Cowden Syndrome. Head Neck Pathol 10:131-8 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12105-016-0708-7
Barletta JA, Bellizzi AM and Hornick JL (2011) Immunohistochemical staining of thyroidectomy specimens for PTEN can aid in the identification of patients with Cowden syndrome. Am J Surg Pathol 35:1505-11 https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0b013e31822fbc7d
Srivastava A, Giangiobbe S, Skopelitou D et al (2021) Whole Genome Sequencing Prioritizes CHEK2, EWSR1, and TIAM1 as Possible Predisposition Genes for Familial Non-Medullary Thyroid Cancer. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 12:600682 https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2021.600682
Khan NE, Bauer AJ, Schultz KAP et al (2017) Quantification of Thyroid Cancer and Multinodular Goiter Risk in the DICER1 Syndrome: A Family-Based Cohort Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 102:1614-1622 https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2016-2954
Ravella L, Lopez J, Descotes F, Lifante JC, David C and Decaussin-Petrucci M (2018) [DICER1 mutated, solid/trabecular thyroid papillary carcinoma in an 11-year-old child]. Ann Pathol 38:316-320 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annpat.2018.04.003
Dahia PL, Ross KN, Wright ME et al (2005) A HIF1alpha regulatory loop links hypoxia and mitochondrial signals in pheochromocytomas. PLoS Genet 1:72-80 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.0010008
Gill AJ (2012) Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) and mitochondrial driven neoplasia. Pathology 44:285-92 https://doi.org/10.1097/PAT.0b013e3283539932
Gill AJ (2018) Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)-deficient neoplasia. Histopathology 72:106-116 https://doi.org/10.1111/his.13277
Gill AJ, Chou A, Vilain R et al (2010) Immunohistochemistry for SDHB divides gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) into 2 distinct types. Am J Surg Pathol 34:636-44 https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181d6150d
Miettinen M, Wang ZF, Sarlomo-Rikala M, Osuch C, Rutkowski P and Lasota J (2011) Succinate dehydrogenase-deficient GISTs: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic study of 66 gastric GISTs with predilection to young age. Am J Surg Pathol 35:1712-21 https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0b013e3182260752
Elston MS, Sehgal S, Dray M et al (2017) A Duodenal SDH-Deficient Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor in a Patient With a Germline SDHB Mutation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 102:1447-1450 https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2017-00165
Fuchs TL, Maclean F, Turchini J et al (2021) Expanding the clinicopathological spectrum of succinate dehydrogenase-deficient renal cell carcinoma with a focus on variant morphologies: a study of 62 new tumors in 59 patients. Mod Pathol https://doi.org/10.1038/s41379-021-00998-1
Trpkov K, Hes O, Williamson SR et al (2021) New developments in existing WHO entities and evolving molecular concepts: The Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) update on renal neoplasia. Mod Pathol 34:1392-1424 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41379-021-00779-w
Korpershoek E, Favier J, Gaal J et al (2011) SDHA immunohistochemistry detects germline SDHA gene mutations in apparently sporadic paragangliomas and pheochromocytomas. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96:E1472-6 https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2011-1043
Dwight T, Benn DE, Clarkson A et al (2013) Loss of SDHA expression identifies SDHA mutations in succinate dehydrogenase-deficient gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Am J Surg Pathol 37:226-33 https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0b013e3182671155
Turchini J and Gill AJ (2020) Morphologic Clues to Succinate Dehydrogenase (SDH) Deficiency in Pheochromocytomas and Paragangliomas. Am J Surg Pathol 44:422-424 https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000001415
Janeway KA, Kim SY, Lodish M et al (2011) Defects in succinate dehydrogenase in gastrointestinal stromal tumors lacking KIT and PDGFRA mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:314-8 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1009199108
Gill AJ, Chou A, Vilain RE and Clifton-Bligh RJ (2011) "Pediatric-type" gastrointestinal stromal tumors are SDHB negative ("type 2") GISTs. Am J Surg Pathol 35:1245–7; author reply 1247–8 https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0b013e3182217b93
Gill AJ, Pachter NS, Chou A et al (2011) Renal tumors associated with germline SDHB mutation show distinctive morphology. Am J Surg Pathol 35:1578-85 https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0b013e318227e7f4
Williamson SR, Eble JN, Amin MB et al (2015) Succinate dehydrogenase-deficient renal cell carcinoma: detailed characterization of 11 tumors defining a unique subtype of renal cell carcinoma. Mod Pathol 28:80-94 https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.2014.86
Gill AJ, Hes O, Papathomas T et al (2014) Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)-deficient renal carcinoma: a morphologically distinct entity: a clinicopathologic series of 36 tumors from 27 patients. Am J Surg Pathol 38:1588-602 https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000000292
Xekouki P, Szarek E, Bullova P et al (2015) Pituitary adenoma with paraganglioma/pheochromocytoma (3PAs) and succinate dehydrogenase defects in humans and mice. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 100:E710-9 https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2014-4297
Gill AJ, Toon CW, Clarkson A et al (2014) Succinate dehydrogenase deficiency is rare in pituitary adenomas. Am J Surg Pathol 38:560-6 https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000000149
Papathomas TG, Gaal J, Corssmit EP et al (2014) Non-pheochromocytoma (PCC)/paraganglioma (PGL) tumors in patients with succinate dehydrogenase-related PCC-PGL syndromes: a clinicopathological and molecular analysis. Eur J Endocrinol 170:1-12 https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-13-0623
Dwight T, Mann K, Benn DE et al (2013) Familial SDHA mutation associated with pituitary adenoma and pheochromocytoma/paraganglioma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98:E1103-8 https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2013-1400
Chatzopoulos K, Fritchie KJ, Aubry MC, Carney JA, Folpe AL and Boland JM (2019) Loss of succinate dehydrogenase B immunohistochemical expression distinguishes pulmonary chondromas from hamartomas. Histopathology 75:825-832 https://doi.org/10.1111/his.13945
Benn DE, Zhu Y, Andrews KA et al (2018) Bayesian approach to determining penetrance of pathogenic SDH variants. J Med Genet 55:729-734 https://doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2018-105427
Papathomas TG and Nose V (2019) New and Emerging Biomarkers in Endocrine Pathology. Adv Anat Pathol 26:198-209 https://doi.org/10.1097/PAP.0000000000000227
Williamson SR, Gill AJ, Argani P et al (2020) Report From the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consultation Conference on Molecular Pathology of Urogenital Cancers: III: Molecular Pathology of Kidney Cancer. Am J Surg Pathol 44:e47-e65 https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000001476
van Nederveen FH, Korpershoek E, Lenders JW, de Krijger RR and Dinjens WN (2007) Somatic SDHB mutation in an extraadrenal pheochromocytoma. N Engl J Med 357:306-8 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc070010
van Nederveen FH, Gaal J, Favier J et al (2009) An immunohistochemical procedure to detect patients with paraganglioma and phaeochromocytoma with germline SDHB, SDHC, or SDHD gene mutations: a retrospective and prospective analysis. Lancet Oncol 10:764-71 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70164-0
Turchini J and Gill AJ (2020) Hereditary Parathyroid Disease: Sometimes Pathologists Do Not Know What They Are Missing. Endocr Pathol 31:218-230 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12022-020-09631-4
Torresan F and Iacobone M (2019) Clinical Features, Treatment, and Surveillance of Hyperparathyroidism-Jaw Tumor Syndrome: An Up-to-Date and Review of the Literature. Int J Endocrinol 2019:1761030 https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/1761030
Sarquis MS, Silveira LG, Pimenta FJ et al (2008) Familial hyperparathyroidism: surgical outcome after 30 years of follow-up in three families with germline HRPT2 mutations. Surgery 143:630-40 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2007.12.012
Jackson CE, Norum RA, Boyd SB et al (1990) Hereditary hyperparathyroidism and multiple ossifying jaw fibromas: a clinically and genetically distinct syndrome. Surgery 108:1006–12; discussion 1012–3
Mehta A, Patel D, Rosenberg A et al (2014) Hyperparathyroidism-jaw tumor syndrome: Results of operative management. Surgery 156:1315–24; discussion 1324–5 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2014.08.004
Iacobone M, Masi G, Barzon L et al (2009) Hyperparathyroidism-jaw tumor syndrome: a report of three large kindred. Langenbecks Arch Surg 394:817-25 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-009-0511-y
Masi G, Barzon L, Iacobone M et al (2008) Clinical, genetic, and histopathologic investigation of CDC73-related familial hyperparathyroidism. Endocr Relat Cancer 15:1115-26 https://doi.org/10.1677/ERC-08-0066
Bricaire L, Odou MF, Cardot-Bauters C et al (2013) Frequent large germline HRPT2 deletions in a French National cohort of patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98:E403-8 https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2012-2789
Gill AJ, Lim G, Cheung VKY et al (2019) Parafibromin-deficient (HPT-JT Type, CDC73 Mutated) Parathyroid Tumors Demonstrate Distinctive Morphologic Features. Am J Surg Pathol 43:35-46 https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000001017
Wasserman JD, Tomlinson GE, Druker H et al (2017) Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia and Hyperparathyroid-Jaw Tumor Syndromes: Clinical Features, Genetics, and Surveillance Recommendations in Childhood. Clin Cancer Res 23:e123-e132 https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0548
Carpten JD, Robbins CM, Villablanca A et al (2002) HRPT2, encoding parafibromin, is mutated in hyperparathyroidism-jaw tumor syndrome. Nat Genet 32:676-80 https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1048
Gill AJ, Clarkson A, Gimm O et al (2006) Loss of nuclear expression of parafibromin distinguishes parathyroid carcinomas and hyperparathyroidism-jaw tumor (HPT-JT) syndrome-related adenomas from sporadic parathyroid adenomas and hyperplasias. Am J Surg Pathol 30:1140-9 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.pas.0000209827.39477.4f
Gill AJ (2014) Understanding the genetic basis of parathyroid carcinoma. Endocr Pathol 25:30-4 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12022-013-9294-3
Juhlin CC, Nilsson IL, Lagerstedt-Robinson K et al (2019) Parafibromin immunostainings of parathyroid tumors in clinical routine: a near-decade experience from a tertiary center. Mod Pathol 32:1082-1094 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41379-019-0252-6
Howell VM, Gill A, Clarkson A et al (2009) Accuracy of combined protein gene product 9.5 and parafibromin markers for immunohistochemical diagnosis of parathyroid carcinoma. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 94:434-41 https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2008-1740
Comino-Mendez I, Gracia-Aznarez FJ, Schiavi F et al (2011) Exome sequencing identifies MAX mutations as a cause of hereditary pheochromocytoma. Nat Genet 43:663-7 https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.861
Turchini J, Cheung VKY, Tischler AS, De Krijger RR and Gill AJ (2018) Pathology and genetics of phaeochromocytoma and paraganglioma. Histopathology 72:97-105 https://doi.org/10.1111/his.13402
Cheung VKY, Gill AJ and Chou A (2018) Old, New, and Emerging Immunohistochemical Markers in Pheochromocytoma and Paraganglioma. Endocr Pathol 29:169-175 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12022-018-9534-7
Zhou XP, Marsh DJ, Morrison CD et al (2003) Germline inactivation of PTEN and dysregulation of the phosphoinositol-3-kinase/Akt pathway cause human Lhermitte-Duclos disease in adults. Am J Hum Genet 73:1191-8 https://doi.org/10.1086/379382
Huang SC, Lee JK, Smith EJ et al (2011) Evidence for an hMSH3 defect in familial hamartomatous polyps. Cancer 117:492-500 https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.25445
Gara SK, Jia L, Merino MJ et al (2015) Germline HABP2 Mutation Causing Familial Nonmedullary Thyroid Cancer. N Engl J Med 373:448-55 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1502449
Pasquali D, Torella A, Accardo G et al (2021) BROX haploinsufficiency in familial nonmedullary thyroid cancer. J Endocrinol Invest 44:165-171 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-020-01286-6
Bakhsh AD, Ladas I, Hamshere ML et al (2018) An InDel in Phospholipase-C-B-1 Is Linked with Euthyroid Multinodular Goiter. Thyroid 28:891-901 https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2017.0312
Orois A, Gara SK, Mora M et al (2019) NOP53 as A Candidate Modifier Locus for Familial Non-Medullary Thyroid Cancer. Genes (Basel) 10 https://doi.org/10.3390/genes10110899
Doherty GM, Lairmore TC and DeBenedetti MK (2004) Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 parathyroid adenoma development over time. World J Surg 28:1139-42 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-004-7560-8
Thakker RV (2014) Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) and type 4 (MEN4). Mol Cell Endocrinol 386:2-15 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mce.2013.08.002
Schernthaner-Reiter MH, Trivellin G and Stratakis CA (2016) MEN1, MEN4, and Carney Complex: Pathology and Molecular Genetics. Neuroendocrinology 103:18-31 https://doi.org/10.1159/000371819
Friedman E, Sakaguchi K, Bale AE et al (1989) Clonality of parathyroid tumors in familial multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. N Engl J Med 321:213-8 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM198907273210402
Singh Ospina N, Sebo TJ, Thompson GB, Clarke BL and Young WF, Jr. (2016) Prevalence of parathyroid carcinoma in 348 patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 - case report and review of the literature. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf) 84:244-249 https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.12714
Mathiesen JS, Effraimidis G, Rossing M et al (2021) Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2: A reveiw. Semin Cancer Biol https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2021.03.035
Larsen LV, Mirebeau-Prunier D, Imai T et al (2020) Primary hyperparathyroidism as first manifestation in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A: an international multicenter study. Endocr Connect 9:489-497 https://doi.org/10.1530/EC-20-0163
Bradley KJ, Hobbs MR, Buley ID et al (2005) Uterine tumours are a phenotypic manifestation of the hyperparathyroidism-jaw tumour syndrome. J Intern Med 257:18-26 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2796.2004.01421.x
Vocke CD, Ricketts CJ, Ball MW et al (2019) CDC73 Germline Mutation in a Family With Mixed Epithelial and Stromal Tumors. Urology 124:91-97 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2018.11.013
Ibrahem HM (2020) Ossifying fibroma of the jaw bones in hyperparathyroidism-jaw tumor syndrome: Analysis of 24 cases retrieved from literatures. J Dent Sci 15:426-432 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2019.12.007
Szabo J, Heath B, Hill VM et al (1995) Hereditary hyperparathyroidism-jaw tumor syndrome: the endocrine tumor gene HRPT2 maps to chromosome 1q21-q31. Am J Hum Genet 56:944-50
Shattuck TM, Valimaki S, Obara T et al (2003) Somatic and germ-line mutations of the HRPT2 gene in sporadic parathyroid carcinoma. N Engl J Med 349:1722-9 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa031237
Cetani F, Pardi E, Borsari S et al (2004) Genetic analyses of the HRPT2 gene in primary hyperparathyroidism: germline and somatic mutations in familial and sporadic parathyroid tumors. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:5583-91 https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2004-0294
Erickson LA and Mete O (2018) Immunohistochemistry in Diagnostic Parathyroid Pathology. Endocr Pathol 29:113-129 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12022-018-9527-6
Williams MD, DeLellis RA, Erickson LA et al (2021) Pathology data set for reporting parathyroid carcinoma and atypical parathyroid neoplasm: recommendations from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting. Hum Pathol 110:73-82 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humpath.2020.07.008
Castinetti F, Qi XP, Walz MK et al (2014) Outcomes of adrenal-sparing surgery or total adrenalectomy in phaeochromocytoma associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2: an international retrospective population-based study. Lancet Oncol 15:648-55 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70154-8
Amodru V, Taieb D, Guerin C et al (2020) MEN2-related pheochromocytoma: current state of knowledge, specific characteristics in MEN2B, and perspectives. Endocrine 69:496-503 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-020-02332-2
Thosani S, Ayala-Ramirez M, Palmer L et al (2013) The characterization of pheochromocytoma and its impact on overall survival in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98:E1813-9 https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2013-1653
Castinetti F, Waguespack SG, Machens A et al (2019) Natural history, treatment, and long-term follow up of patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2B: an international, multicentre, retrospective study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 7:213-220 https://doi.org/10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30336-X
Imai T, Uchino S, Okamoto T et al (2013) High penetrance of pheochromocytoma in multiple endocrine neoplasia 2 caused by germ line RET codon 634 mutation in Japanese patients. Eur J Endocrinol 168:683-7 https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-12-1106
Yamasaki M, Sato Y, Nomura T, Sato F, Uchino S and Mimata H (2017) Composite paraganglioma-ganglioneuroma concomitant with adrenal metastasis of medullary thyroid carcinoma in a patient with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2B: A case report. Asian J Endosc Surg 10:66-69 https://doi.org/10.1111/ases.12332
Schreinemakers JM, Pieterman CR, Scholten A, Vriens MR, Valk GD and Rinkes IH (2011) The optimal surgical treatment for primary hyperparathyroidism in MEN1 patients: a systematic review. World J Surg 35:1993-2005 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-011-1068-9
Pieterman CR, van Hulsteijn LT, den Heijer M et al (2012) Primary hyperparathyroidism in MEN1 patients: a cohort study with longterm follow-up on preferred surgical procedure and the relation with genotype. Ann Surg 255:1171-8 https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e31824c5145
Brandi ML, Gagel RF, Angeli A et al (2001) Guidelines for diagnosis and therapy of MEN type 1 and type 2. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:5658-71 https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.86.12.8070
Thakker RV, Newey PJ, Walls GV et al (2012) Clinical practice guidelines for multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97:2990-3011 https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2012-1230
Dreijerink KM, Goudet P, Burgess JR, Valk GD and International Breast Cancer in MENSG (2014) Breast-cancer predisposition in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. N Engl J Med 371:583-4 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMc1406028
Al-Salameh A, Cadiot G, Calender A, Goudet P and Chanson P (2021) Clinical aspects of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1. Nat Rev Endocrinol 17:207-224 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41574-021-00468-3
Griniatsos JE, Dimitriou N, Zilos A et al (2011) Bilateral adrenocortical carcinoma in a patient with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) and a novel mutation in the MEN1 gene. World J Surg Oncol 9:6 https://doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-9-6
Gatta-Cherifi B, Chabre O, Murat A et al (2012) Adrenal involvement in MEN1. Analysis of 715 cases from the Groupe d'etude des Tumeurs Endocrines database. Eur J Endocrinol 166:269-79 https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-11-0679
Wells SA, Jr., Asa SL, Dralle H et al (2015) Revised American Thyroid Association guidelines for the management of medullary thyroid carcinoma. Thyroid 25:567-610 https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2014.0335
Hunt JL, Carty SE, Yim JH, Murphy J and Barnes L (2005) Allelic loss in parathyroid neoplasia can help characterize malignancy. Am J Surg Pathol 29:1049-55
Silva-Figueroa AM, Bassett R, Jr., Christakis I et al (2019) Using a Novel Diagnostic Nomogram to Differentiate Malignant from Benign Parathyroid Neoplasms. Endocr Pathol 30:285-296 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12022-019-09592-3
Juhlin CC and Erickson LA (2021) Genomics and Epigenomics in Parathyroid Neoplasia: from Bench to Surgical Pathology Practice. Endocr Pathol 32:17-34 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12022-020-09656-9
Pimenta FJ, Gontijo Silveira LF, Tavares GC et al (2006) HRPT2 gene alterations in ossifying fibroma of the jaws. Oral Oncol 42:735-9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oraloncology.2005.11.019
Haven CJ, Wong FK, van Dam EW et al (2000) A genotypic and histopathological study of a large Dutch kindred with hyperparathyroidism-jaw tumor syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:1449-54 https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.85.4.6518
Walls GV, Stevenson M, Lines KE et al (2017) Mice deleted for cell division cycle 73 gene develop parathyroid and uterine tumours: model for the hyperparathyroidism-jaw tumour syndrome. Oncogene 36:4025-4036 https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2017.43
Vortmeyer AO, Falke EA, Glasker S, Li J and Oldfield EH (2013) Nervous system involvement in von Hippel-Lindau disease: pathology and mechanisms. Acta Neuropathol 125:333-50 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00401-013-1091-z
Wang JY, Peng SH, Li T et al (2018) Risk factors for survival in patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease. J Med Genet 55:322-328 https://doi.org/10.1136/jmedgenet-2017-104995
Binderup MLM, Stendell AS, Galanakis M, Moller HU, Kiilgaard JF and Bisgaard ML (2018) Retinal hemangioblastoma: prevalence, incidence and frequency of underlying von Hippel-Lindau disease. Br J Ophthalmol 102:942-947 https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2017-310884
Maddock IR, Moran A, Maher ER et al (1996) A genetic register for von Hippel-Lindau disease. J Med Genet 33:120-7 https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg.33.2.120
Adeniran AJ, Shuch B and Humphrey PA (2015) Hereditary Renal Cell Carcinoma Syndromes: Clinical, Pathologic, and Genetic Features. Am J Surg Pathol 39:e1-e18 https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000000562
Furth PA, Shamay A, Wall RJ and Hennighausen L (1992) Gene transfer into somatic tissues by jet injection. Anal Biochem 205:365-8 https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(92)90449-h
Kennedy JM, Wang X, Plouffe KR et al (2019) Clinical and morphologic review of 60 hereditary renal tumors from 30 hereditary renal cell carcinoma syndrome patients: lessons from a contemporary single institution series. Med Oncol 36:74 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-019-1297-6
Manski TJ, Heffner DK, Glenn GM et al (1997) Endolymphatic sac tumors. A source of morbid hearing loss in von Hippel-Lindau disease. JAMA 277:1461-6 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.277.18.1461
Bausch B, Wellner U, Peyre M et al (2016) Characterization of endolymphatic sac tumors and von Hippel-Lindau disease in the International Endolymphatic Sac Tumor Registry. Head Neck 38 Suppl 1:E673-9 https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.24067
Walther MM, Reiter R, Keiser HR et al (1999) Clinical and genetic characterization of pheochromocytoma in von Hippel-Lindau families: comparison with sporadic pheochromocytoma gives insight into natural history of pheochromocytoma. J Urol 162:659-64 https://doi.org/10.1097/00005392-199909010-00004
Lubensky IA, Pack S, Ault D et al (1998) Multiple neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas in von Hippel-Lindau disease patients: histopathological and molecular genetic analysis. Am J Pathol 153:223-31 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65563-0
Perigny M, Hammel P, Corcos O et al (2009) Pancreatic endocrine microadenomatosis in patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease: characterization by VHL/HIF pathway proteins expression. Am J Surg Pathol 33:739-48 https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0b013e3181967992
Hammel PR, Vilgrain V, Terris B et al (2000) Pancreatic involvement in von Hippel-Lindau disease. The Groupe Francophone d'Etude de la Maladie de von Hippel-Lindau. Gastroenterology 119:1087-95 https://doi.org/10.1053/gast.2000.18143
Richard S, Gardie B, Couve S and Gad S (2013) Von Hippel-Lindau: how a rare disease illuminates cancer biology. Semin Cancer Biol 23:26-37 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.semcancer.2012.05.005
Gucer H, Szentgyorgyi E, Ezzat S, Asa SL and Mete O (2013) Inhibin-expressing clear cell neuroendocrine tumor of the ampulla: an unusual presentation of von Hippel-Lindau disease. Virchows Arch 463:593-7 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00428-013-1465-6
Sinkre PA, Murakata L, Rabin L, Hoang MP and Albores-Saavedra J (2001) Clear cell carcinoid tumor of the gallbladder: another distinctive manifestation of von Hippel-Lindau disease. Am J Surg Pathol 25:1334-9 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000478-200110000-00017
Odrzywolski KJ and Mukhopadhyay S (2010) Papillary cystadenoma of the epididymis. Arch Pathol Lab Med 134:630-3 https://doi.org/10.1043/1543-2165-134.4.630
Brady A, Nayar A, Cross P et al (2012) A detailed immunohistochemical analysis of 2 cases of papillary cystadenoma of the broad ligament: an extremely rare neoplasm characteristic of patients with von hippel-lindau disease. Int J Gynecol Pathol 31:133-40 https://doi.org/10.1097/PGP.0b013e318228f577
Zanotelli DB, Bruder E, Wight E and Troeger C (2010) Bilateral papillary cystadenoma of the mesosalpinx: a rare manifestation of Von Hippel-Lindau disease. Arch Gynecol Obstet 282:343-6 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-010-1386-4
Binderup ML, Bisgaard ML, Harbud V et al (2013) Von Hippel-Lindau disease (vHL). National clinical guideline for diagnosis and surveillance in Denmark. 3rd edition. Dan Med J 60:B4763
Rednam SP, Erez A, Druker H et al (2017) Von Hippel-Lindau and Hereditary Pheochromocytoma/Paraganglioma Syndromes: Clinical Features, Genetics, and Surveillance Recommendations in Childhood. Clin Cancer Res 23:e68-e75 https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0547
Relles D, Baek J, Witkiewicz A and Yeo CJ (2010) Periampullary and duodenal neoplasms in neurofibromatosis type 1: two cases and an updated 20-year review of the literature yielding 76 cases. J Gastrointest Surg 14:1052-61 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-009-1123-0
Burke AP, Federspiel BH, Sobin LH, Shekitka KM and Helwig EB (1989) Carcinoids of the duodenum. A histologic and immunohistochemical study of 65 tumors. Am J Surg Pathol 13:828-37 https://doi.org/10.1097/00000478-198910000-00002
Garbrecht N, Anlauf M, Schmitt A et al (2008) Somatostatin-producing neuroendocrine tumors of the duodenum and pancreas: incidence, types, biological behavior, association with inherited syndromes, and functional activity. Endocr Relat Cancer 15:229-41 https://doi.org/10.1677/ERC-07-0157
Sakorafas GH, Giannopoulos GA, Parasi A et al (2008) Large somatostatin-producing endocrine carcinoma of the ampulla of vater in association with GIST in a patient with von Recklinghausen's disease. Case report and review of the literature. JOP 9:633-9
Stephens M, Williams GT, Jasani B and Williams ED (1987) Synchronous duodenal neuroendocrine tumours in von Recklinghausen's disease--a case report of co-existing gangliocytic paraganglioma and somatostatin-rich glandular carcinoid. Histopathology 11:1331-40 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2559.1987.tb01877.x
Deschamps L, Dokmak S, Guedj N, Ruszniewski P, Sauvanet A and Couvelard A (2010) Mixed endocrine somatostatinoma of the ampulla of vater associated with a neurofibromatosis type 1: a case report and review of the literature. JOP 11:64-8
Gregorio C, Rosset C, Alves LDS et al (2020) Synchronous Periampullary Tumors in a Patient With Pancreas Divisum and Neurofibromatosis Type 1. Front Genet 11:395 https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2020.00395
Welander J, Soderkvist P and Gimm O (2013) The NF1 gene: a frequent mutational target in sporadic pheochromocytomas and beyond. Endocr Relat Cancer 20:C13-7 https://doi.org/10.1530/ERC-13-0046
Kimura N, Watanabe T, Fukase M, Wakita A, Noshiro T and Kimura I (2002) Neurofibromin and NF1 gene analysis in composite pheochromocytoma and tumors associated with von Recklinghausen's disease. Mod Pathol 15:183-8 https://doi.org/10.1038/modpathol.3880513
Tan MH, Mester J, Peterson C et al (2011) A clinical scoring system for selection of patients for PTEN mutation testing is proposed on the basis of a prospective study of 3042 probands. Am J Hum Genet 88:42-56 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.11.013
Scapineli JO, Ceolin L, Punales MK, Dora JM and Maia AL (2016) MEN 2A-related cutaneous lichen amyloidosis: report of three kindred and systematic literature review of clinical, biochemical and molecular characteristics. Fam Cancer 15:625-33 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-016-9892-6
Rothberg AE, Raymond VM, Gruber SB and Sisson J (2009) Familial medullary thyroid carcinoma associated with cutaneous lichen amyloidosis. Thyroid 19:651-5 https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2009.0021
Qi XP, Zhao JQ, Chen ZG et al (2015) RET mutation p.S891A in a Chinese family with familial medullary thyroid carcinoma and associated cutaneous amyloidosis binding OSMR variant p.G513D. Oncotarget 6:33993-4003 https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.4992
Qi XP, Peng JZ, Yang XW et al (2018) The RET C611Y mutation causes MEN 2A and associated cutaneous. Endocr Connect 7:998-1005 https://doi.org/10.1530/EC-18-0220
Alegria-Landa V, Jo-Velasco M, Robledo M and Requena L (2017) Dermal Hyperneury and Multiple Sclerotic Fibromas in Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 2A Syndrome. JAMA Dermatol 153:1298-1301 https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.3959
Robinson MF, Furst EJ, Nunziata V et al (1992) Characterization of the clinical features of five families with hereditary primary cutaneous lichen amyloidosis and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2. Henry Ford Hosp Med J 40:249-52
Qi XP, Zhao JQ, Cao ZL et al (2018) The Clinical Spectrum of Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 2A with Cutaneous Lichen Amyloidosis in Ethnic Han Chinese. Cancer Invest 36:141-151 https://doi.org/10.1080/07357907.2018.1430813
Karga HJ, Karayianni MK, Linos DA, Tseleni SC, Karaiskos KD and Papapetrou PD (1998) Germ line mutation analysis in families with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A or familial medullary thyroid carcinoma. Eur J Endocrinol 139:410-5 https://doi.org/10.1530/eje.0.1390410
Donovan DT, Levy ML, Furst EJ et al (1989) Familial cutaneous lichen amyloidosis in association with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A: a new variant. Henry Ford Hosp Med J 37:147-50
Erickson LA, Vrana JA, Theis J et al (2015) Analysis of Amyloid in Medullary Thyroid Carcinoma by Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomic Analysis. Endocr Pathol 26:291-5 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12022-015-9390-7
Gagel RF, Levy ML, Donovan DT, Alford BR, Wheeler T and Tschen JA (1989) Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2a associated with cutaneous lichen amyloidosis. Ann Intern Med 111:802-6 https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-111-10-802
Ieremia E, Marusic Z, Mudaliar V et al (2019) Expanding the clinical spectrum of dermal hyperneury: report of nine new cases and a review of the literature. Histopathology 75:738-745 https://doi.org/10.1111/his.13941
Redlich A, Lessel L, Petrou A, Mier P and Vorwerk P (2020) Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2B: Frequency of physical stigmata-Results of the GPOH-MET registry. Pediatr Blood Cancer 67:e28056 https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.28056
Winkelmann RK and Carney JA (1982) Cutaneous neuropathology in multiple endocrine neoplasia, type 2b. J Invest Dermatol 79:307-12 https://doi.org/10.1111/1523-1747.ep12500083
Marusic Z, Korsa L and Calonje E (2021) Dermal hyperneury. Clin Dermatol 39:291-294 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2020.10.008
Harach HR, Soubeyran I, Brown A, Bonneau D and Longy M (1999) Thyroid pathologic findings in patients with Cowden disease. Ann Diagn Pathol 3:331-40 https://doi.org/10.1016/s1092-9134(99)80011-2
Smith JR, Marqusee E, Webb S et al (2011) Thyroid nodules and cancer in children with PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 96:34-7 https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2010-1315
Milas M, Mester J, Metzger R et al (2012) Should patients with Cowden syndrome undergo prophylactic thyroidectomy? Surgery 152:1201-10 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2012.08.055
Hall JE, Abdollahian DJ and Sinard RJ (2013) Thyroid disease associated with Cowden syndrome: A meta-analysis. Head Neck 35:1189-94 https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.22971
Cameselle-Teijeiro J, Fachal C, Cabezas-Agricola JM et al (2015) Thyroid Pathology Findings in Cowden Syndrome: A Clue for the Diagnosis of the PTEN Hamartoma Tumor Syndrome. Am J Clin Pathol 144:322-8 https://doi.org/10.1309/AJCP84INGJUVTBME
Szabo Yamashita T, Baky FJ, McKenzie TJ et al (2020) Occurrence and Natural History of Thyroid Cancer in Patients with Cowden Syndrome. Eur Thyroid J 9:243-246 https://doi.org/10.1159/000506422
Peiretti V, Mussa A, Feyles F et al (2013) Thyroid involvement in two patients with Bannayan-Riley-Ruvalcaba syndrome. J Clin Res Pediatr Endocrinol 5:261-5 https://doi.org/10.4274/Jcrpe.984
Zambrano E, Holm I, Glickman J et al (2004) Abnormal distribution and hyperplasia of thyroid C-cells in PTEN-associated tumor syndromes. Endocr Pathol 15:55-64 https://doi.org/10.1385/ep:15:1:55
Uchino S, Ishikawa H, Miyauchi A et al (2016) Age- and Gender-Specific Risk of Thyroid Cancer in Patients With Familial Adenomatous Polyposis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 101:4611-4617 https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2016-2043
Harach HR, Williams GT and Williams ED (1994) Familial adenomatous polyposis associated thyroid carcinoma: a distinct type of follicular cell neoplasm. Histopathology 25:549-61 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2559.1994.tb01374.x
Cameselle-Teijeiro J and Chan JK (1999) Cribriform-morular variant of papillary carcinoma: a distinctive variant representing the sporadic counterpart of familial adenomatous polyposis-associated thyroid carcinoma? Mod Pathol 12:400-11
Cameselle-Teijeiro JM and Sobrinho-Simoes M (2019) Cribriform-morular variant of thyroid carcinoma. Pathologica 111:1-3 https://doi.org/10.32074/1591-951X-66-18
Cameselle-Teijeiro J, Menasce LP, Yap BK et al (2009) Cribriform-morular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma: molecular characterization of a case with neuroendocrine differentiation and aggressive behavior. Am J Clin Pathol 131:134-42 https://doi.org/10.1309/AJCP7ULS0VSISBEB
Nakazawa T, Celestino R, Machado JC et al (2013) Cribriform-morular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma displaying poorly differentiated features. Int J Surg Pathol 21:379-89 https://doi.org/10.1177/1066896912473355
Corean J, Furtado LV, Kadri S, Segal JP and Emerson LL (2019) Cribriform-Morular Variant of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma With Poorly Differentiated Features: A Case Report With Immunohistochemical and Molecular Genetic Analysis. Int J Surg Pathol 27:294-304 https://doi.org/10.1177/1066896918796946
Tsuji H, Yasuoka H, Nakamura Y et al (2018) Aggressive cribriform-morular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma: Report of an unusual case with pulmonary metastasis displaying poorly differentiated features. Pathol Int 68:700-705 https://doi.org/10.1111/pin.12728
Oh EJ, Lee S, Bae JS, Kim Y, Jeon S and Jung CK (2017) TERT Promoter Mutation in an Aggressive Cribriform Morular Variant of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma. Endocr Pathol 28:49-53 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12022-016-9454-3
Stratakis CA, Courcoutsakis NA, Abati A et al (1997) Thyroid gland abnormalities in patients with the syndrome of spotty skin pigmentation, myxomas, endocrine overactivity, and schwannomas (Carney complex). J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:2037-43 https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.82.7.4079
Carney JA, Lyssikatos C, Seethala RR et al (2018) The Spectrum of Thyroid Gland Pathology in Carney Complex: The Importance of Follicular Carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 42:587-594 https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000000975
Stratakis CA and Raygada M (1993) Carney Complex. GeneReviews((R))
Hattori S, Yamane Y, Shimomura R et al (2018) Carney complex: a case with thyroid follicular adenoma without a PRKAR1A mutation. Surg Case Rep 4:34 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40792-018-0438-z
Halaszlaki C, Takacs I, Butz H, Patocs A and Lakatos P (2012) Novel genetic mutation in the background of Carney complex. Pathol Oncol Res 18:149-52 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12253-012-9502-3
Ishikawa Y, Sugano H, Matsumoto T, Furuichi Y, Miller RW and Goto M (1999) Unusual features of thyroid carcinomas in Japanese patients with Werner syndrome and possible genotype-phenotype relations to cell type and race. Cancer 85:1345-52
Winer DA, Winer S, Rotstein L, Asa SL and Mete O (2012) Villous papillary thyroid carcinoma: a variant associated with marfan syndrome. Endocr Pathol 23:254-9 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12022-012-9219-6
Sippel RS, Caron NR and Clark OH (2007) An evidence-based approach to familial nonmedullary thyroid cancer: screening, clinical management, and follow-up. World J Surg 31:924-33 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-006-0847-1
Ito Y, Kakudo K, Hirokawa M et al (2009) Biological behavior and prognosis of familial papillary thyroid carcinoma. Surgery 145:100-5 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2008.08.004
Robenshtok E, Tzvetov G, Grozinsky-Glasberg S et al (2011) Clinical characteristics and outcome of familial nonmedullary thyroid cancer: a retrospective controlled study. Thyroid 21:43-8 https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2009.0406
Moses W, Weng J and Kebebew E (2011) Prevalence, clinicopathologic features, and somatic genetic mutation profile in familial versus sporadic nonmedullary thyroid cancer. Thyroid 21:367-71 https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2010.0256
Park YJ, Ahn HY, Choi HS, Kim KW, Park DJ and Cho BY (2012) The long-term outcomes of the second generation of familial nonmedullary thyroid carcinoma are more aggressive than sporadic cases. Thyroid 22:356-62 https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2011.0163
Kim YS, Seo M, Park SH, Ju SY and Kim ES (2020) Should Total Thyroidectomy Be Recommended for Patients with Familial Non-medullary Thyroid Cancer? World J Surg 44:3022-3027 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-020-05473-7
Burgess JR, Duffield A, Wilkinson SJ et al (1997) Two families with an autosomal dominant inheritance pattern for papillary carcinoma of the thyroid. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 82:345-8 https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.82.2.3789
Bann DV, Jin Q, Sheldon KE et al (2019) Genetic Variants Implicate Dual Oxidase-2 in Familial and Sporadic Nonmedullary Thyroid Cancer. Cancer Res 79:5490-5499 https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-19-0721
Cirello V, Colombo C, Karapanou O, Pogliaghi G, Persani L and Fugazzola L (2020) Clinical and Genetic Features of a Large Monocentric Series of Familial Non-Medullary Thyroid Cancers. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 11:589340 https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.589340
Pereira JS, da Silva JG, Tomaz RA et al (2015) Identification of a novel germline FOXE1 variant in patients with familial non-medullary thyroid carcinoma (FNMTC). Endocrine 49:204-14 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-014-0470-0
Zhao Y, Yu T, Chen L et al (2020) A Germline CHEK2 Mutation in a Family with Papillary Thyroid Cancer. Thyroid 30:924-930 https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2019.0774
Gasior-Perczak D, Kowalik A, Walczyk A et al (2019) Coexisting Germline CHEK2 and Somatic BRAF(V600E) Mutations in Papillary Thyroid Cancer and Their Association with Clinicopathological Features and Disease Course. Cancers (Basel) 11 https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers11111744
Cavaco BM, Batista PF, Martins C et al (2008) Familial non-medullary thyroid carcinoma (FNMTC): analysis of fPTC/PRN, NMTC1, MNG1 and TCO susceptibility loci and identification of somatic BRAF and RAS mutations. Endocr Relat Cancer 15:207-15 https://doi.org/10.1677/ERC-07-0214
Srivastava A, Kumar A, Giangiobbe S et al (2019) Whole Genome Sequencing of Familial Non-Medullary Thyroid Cancer Identifies Germline Alterations in MAPK/ERK and PI3K/AKT Signaling Pathways. Biomolecules 9 https://doi.org/10.3390/biom9100605
Mazeh H, Benavidez J, Poehls JL, Youngwirth L, Chen H and Sippel RS (2012) In patients with thyroid cancer of follicular cell origin, a family history of nonmedullary thyroid cancer in one first-degree relative is associated with more aggressive disease. Thyroid 22:3-8 https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2011.0192
Alsanea O, Wada N, Ain K et al (2000) Is familial non-medullary thyroid carcinoma more aggressive than sporadic thyroid cancer? A multicenter series. Surgery 128:1043–50; discussion 1050–1 https://doi.org/10.1067/msy.2000.110848
Sturgeon C and Clark OH (2005) Familial nonmedullary thyroid cancer. Thyroid 15:588-93 https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2005.15.588
Tavarelli M, Russo M, Terranova R et al (2015) Familial Non-Medullary Thyroid Cancer Represents an Independent Risk Factor for Increased Cancer Aggressiveness: A Retrospective Analysis of 74 Families. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 6:117 https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2015.00117
Capezzone M, Marchisotta S, Cantara S et al (2008) Familial non-medullary thyroid carcinoma displays the features of clinical anticipation suggestive of a distinct biological entity. Endocr Relat Cancer 15:1075-81 https://doi.org/10.1677/ERC-08-0080
Musholt TJ, Musholt PB, Petrich T, Oetting G, Knapp WH and Klempnauer J (2000) Familial papillary thyroid carcinoma: genetics, criteria for diagnosis, clinical features, and surgical treatment. World J Surg 24:1409-17 https://doi.org/10.1007/s002680010233
Bakhsh A, Kirov G, Gregory JW, Williams ED and Ludgate M (2006) A new form of familial multi-nodular goitre with progression to differentiated thyroid cancer. Endocr Relat Cancer 13:475-83 https://doi.org/10.1677/erc.1.01138
Williams D (2020) Inherited thyroid tumours. Endocrine 68:271-273 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-020-02252-1
Neurofibromatosis (1988) Conference statement. National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Conference. Arch Neurol 45:575–8. PMID: 3128965
Suh I, Filetti S, Vriens MR et al (2009) Distinct loci on chromosome 1q21 and 6q22 predispose to familial nonmedullary thyroid cancer: a SNP array-based linkage analysis of 38 families. Surgery 146:1073-80 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2009.09.012
Malchoff CD, Sarfarazi M, Tendler B et al (2000) Papillary thyroid carcinoma associated with papillary renal neoplasia: genetic linkage analysis of a distinct heritable tumor syndrome. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:1758-64 https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.85.5.6557
Sarquis M, Moraes DC, Bastos-Rodrigues L et al (2020) Germline Mutations in Familial Papillary Thyroid Cancer. Endocr Pathol 31:14-20 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12022-020-09607-4
McKay JD, Thompson D, Lesueur F et al (2004) Evidence for interaction between the TCO and NMTC1 loci in familial non-medullary thyroid cancer. J Med Genet 41:407-12 https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg.2003.017350
Prazeres HJ, Rodrigues F, Soares P et al (2008) Loss of heterozygosity at 19p13.2 and 2q21 in tumours from familial clusters of non-medullary thyroid carcinoma. Fam Cancer 7:141-9 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-007-9160-x
McKay JD, Lesueur F, Jonard L et al (2001) Localization of a susceptibility gene for familial nonmedullary thyroid carcinoma to chromosome 2q21. Am J Hum Genet 69:440-6 https://doi.org/10.1086/321979
Cavaco BM, Batista PF, Sobrinho LG and Leite V (2008) Mapping a new familial thyroid epithelial neoplasia susceptibility locus to chromosome 8p23.1-p22 by high-density single-nucleotide polymorphism genome-wide linkage analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 93:4426-30 https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2008-0449
Wilson TL, Hattangady N, Lerario AM et al (2017) A new POT1 germline mutation-expanding the spectrum of POT1-associated cancers. Fam Cancer 16:561-566 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-017-9984-y
Potrony M, Puig-Butille JA, Ribera-Sola M et al (2019) POT1 germline mutations but not TERT promoter mutations are implicated in melanoma susceptibility in a large cohort of Spanish melanoma families. Br J Dermatol 181:105-113 https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.17443
Richard MA, Lupo PJ, Morton LM et al (2020) Genetic variation in POT1 and risk of thyroid subsequent malignant neoplasm: A report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. PLoS One 15:e0228887 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0228887
Srivastava A, Miao B, Skopelitou D et al (2020) A Germline Mutation in the POT1 Gene Is a Candidate for Familial Non-Medullary Thyroid Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 12 https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12061441
He H, Nagy R, Liyanarachchi S et al (2009) A susceptibility locus for papillary thyroid carcinoma on chromosome 8q24. Cancer Res 69:625-31 https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1071
Bonora E, Rizzato C, Diquigiovanni C et al (2014) The FOXE1 locus is a major genetic determinant for familial nonmedullary thyroid carcinoma. Int J Cancer 134:2098-107 https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.28543
Mancikova V, Cruz R, Inglada-Perez L et al (2015) Thyroid cancer GWAS identifies 10q26.12 and 6q14.1 as novel susceptibility loci and reveals genetic heterogeneity among populations. Int J Cancer 137:1870-8 https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.29557
Bignell GR, Canzian F, Shayeghi M et al (1997) Familial nontoxic multinodular thyroid goiter locus maps to chromosome 14q but does not account for familial nonmedullary thyroid cancer. Am J Hum Genet 61:1123-30 https://doi.org/10.1086/301610
Zhang T and Xing M (2016) HABP2 G534E Mutation in Familial Nonmedullary Thyroid Cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 108:djv415 https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djv415
Bevan S, Pal T, Greenberg CR et al (2001) A comprehensive analysis of MNG1, TCO1, fPTC, PTEN, TSHR, and TRKA in familial nonmedullary thyroid cancer: confirmation of linkage to TCO1. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86:3701-4 https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.86.8.7725
Canzian F, Amati P, Harach HR et al (1998) A gene predisposing to familial thyroid tumors with cell oxyphilia maps to chromosome 19p13.2. Am J Hum Genet 63:1743-8 https://doi.org/10.1086/302164
Harach HR, Lesueur F, Amati P et al (1999) Histology of familial thyroid tumours linked to a gene mapping to chromosome 19p13.2. J Pathol 189:387-93 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199911)189:3<387::AID-PATH443>3.0.CO;2-S
Kraimps JL, Canzian F, Jost C et al (1999) Mapping of a gene predisposing to familial thyroid tumors with cell oxyphilia to chromosome 19 and exclusion of JUN B as a candidate gene. Surgery 126:1188-94 https://doi.org/10.1067/msy.2099.102606
He H, Bronisz A, Liyanarachchi S et al (2013) SRGAP1 is a candidate gene for papillary thyroid carcinoma susceptibility. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98:E973-80 https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2012-3823
Ngan ES, Lang BH, Liu T et al (2009) A germline mutation (A339V) in thyroid transcription factor-1 (TITF-1/NKX2.1) in patients with multinodular goiter and papillary thyroid carcinoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 101:162-75 https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djn471
Liao S, Song W, Liu Y et al (2013) Familial multinodular goiter syndrome with papillary thyroid carcinomas: mutational analysis of the associated genes in 5 cases from 1 Chinese family. BMC Endocr Disord 13:48 https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6823-13-48
Ye F, Gao H, Xiao L et al (2019) Whole exome and target sequencing identifies MAP2K5 as novel susceptibility gene for familial non-medullary thyroid carcinoma. Int J Cancer 144:1321-1330 https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.31825
Tomsic J, He H, Akagi K et al (2015) A germline mutation in SRRM2, a splicing factor gene, is implicated in papillary thyroid carcinoma predisposition. Sci Rep 5:10566 https://doi.org/10.1038/srep10566
Maximo V, Botelho T, Capela J et al (2005) Somatic and germline mutation in GRIM-19, a dual function gene involved in mitochondrial metabolism and cell death, is linked to mitochondrion-rich (Hurthle cell) tumours of the thyroid. Br J Cancer 92:1892-8 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6602547
Bonora E, Evangelisti C, Bonichon F, Tallini G and Romeo G (2006) Novel germline variants identified in the inner mitochondrial membrane transporter TIMM44 and their role in predisposition to oncocytic thyroid carcinomas. Br J Cancer 95:1529-36 https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bjc.6603455
Gasior-Perczak D, Kowalik A, Gruszczynski K et al (2021) Incidence of the CHEK2 Germline Mutation and Its Impact on Clinicopathological Features, Treatment Responses, and Disease Course in Patients with Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 13 https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers13030470
Pires C, Marques IJ, Dias D, Saramago A, Leite V and Cavaco BM (2021) A pathogenic variant in CHEK2 shows a founder effect in Portuguese Roma patients with thyroid cancer. Endocrine 73:588-597 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12020-021-02660-x
Szeliga A, Pralat A, Witczak W et al (2020) CHEK2 Mutation in Patient with Multiple Endocrine Glands Tumors. Case Report. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17 https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17124397
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. The original draft of the manuscript was written in parts by all authors and Vania Nosé have finalized the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
All evaluations performed in this analysis do not involve any individual patient’s data but was still performed in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional review board. The opinions or assertions contained herein are the private views of the authors.
Consent Statement
No personally identifiable information is included and thus informed consent is not applicable.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nosé, V., Gill, A., Teijeiro, J.M.C. et al. Overview of the 2022 WHO Classification of Familial Endocrine Tumor Syndromes. Endocr Pathol 33, 197–227 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12022-022-09705-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12022-022-09705-5