Introduction

Brassinosteroids are plant growth regulator substances. The first brassinosteroid, a novel polyhydroxylated steroidal lactone with high growth-promoting activity, termed brassinolide, obtained from rape pollen (Brassica napus L.) was discovered in 1979 (Grove et al. 1979). This finding showed that steroids are generally signalling molecules in both animals and plants. While mammalian steroid hormones are recognised mainly by nuclear receptors, brassinosteroids in plants, according to current knowledge, are recognised by a cell surface receptor kinase, BRI1 (Wang et al. 2001). BRs include more than 70 compounds found in plant kingdom (Bajguz and Tretyn 2003). In addition to brassinolide, the following compounds belong to the brassinosteroid group: 24-epibrassinolide, castasterone, homobrassinolide, teasterone, dolicholide, typhasterol, etc. (Zullo and Adam 2002; Zullo and Kohout 2004). Brassinosteroid compounds are widely distributed throughout the reproductive and vegetative plant tissues. BRs generally occur in reproductive organs such as pollen (5–1,000 ng g−1 FW) and fruits (0.2–3.5 ng g−1 FW) in relatively high amounts (Symons et al. 2008). In seeds, BRs are present in the range 0.1–1,600 ng g−1 FW (Symons et al. 2008; Janeczko et al. 2010). BR content in shoot tissues is rather lower (0.12–2 ng g−1 FW) (Symons et al. 2008; Janeczko and Swaczynová 2010). In the lowest amounts (<0.05 ng g−1 FW), BRs are found in the roots (Symons et al. 2008).

As with their animal counterparts, BRs regulate the expression of numerous genes, influencing the activity of complex metabolic pathways. Investigations on brassinosteroid mutants confirm that brassinosteroids are important for vascular differentiation, senescence, fertility and photomorphogenesis. Brassinosteroids increase yield in plants of economic importance such as wheat, rice, groundnut, potato, cotton, mung bean and others (Ramraj et al. 1997; Zullo and Adam 2002; Fariduddin et al. 2008; Janeczko et al. 2010). BRs may also improve crop quality (Vardhini and Rao 1998, 2002; Janeczko et al. 2009). BRs have high activity in plant protection against different stressors, such as thermal and heavy metal stressors or pathogen attack (Janeczko et al. 2005; Janeczko et al. 2007a, b; Bajguz and Hayat 2009), and often have more effect when plants are under stress than when they grow under optimal conditions.

The aim of the present work was to study the influence of 24-epibrassinolide on photosynthesis (energy flows in PS II), metabolic activity, dark respiration and the yield formation of barley. Since brassinosteroids very often exhibit their activity in plants growing under stress conditions (Janeczko et al. 2005), barley was exposed to heat shock (42°C for 3 h). As a part of the study, the content of brassinosteroids in barley leaves and efficiency of transport of 24-epibrassinolide after its exogenous application were also analysed with HPLC–MS technique. To estimate the efficiency of energy flow in PSII during the light stage of photosynthesis, measurements of chlorophyll a fast fluorescence were used (Strasser et al. 2000). Unfavourable plant growth conditions alter the transients of fluorescence curves, which are connected with changes in the positions of “F” points and have an effect on the calculated values of phenomenological fluxes that describe PS II efficiency (Strasser et al. 2000). Plant metabolic activity was measured based on the amount of heat released from plant tissues. Measurements were performed using the calorimetric method. Heat is an inevitable by-product of all metabolic processes, but the amount of heat emitted by plant tissues depends on plant age, growth intensity or external factors influencing the plant, such as hormonal treatment or exposure to stress conditions—salinity, drought, pathogen infections, etc. (Criddle et al. 1989; Rapacz and Żur 1996; Criddle and Hansen 1999; Płażek and Rapacz 2000; Smith et al. 2000; Hansen et al. 2004; Stokłosa et al. 2006; Janeczko et al. 2007b). An important part of plant metabolic activity is the respiration process. Analysis of dark respiration provides information about catabolic processes, which also depend on plant age and growth conditions (Brown and Thomas 1980; Lambers and Ribas-Carbó 2005). Dark respiration measurements may also be useful for predicting plant yield (Smith et al. 1995).

Materials and methods

Plant culture and treatments

Seedlings of spring barley (Hordeum vulgarum L. cv. Sezam) were grown in pots, in a greenhouse at day/night temperatures of 20/17°C and under natural light conditions (April, latitude: 50°03′ north; longitude: 19°55′ east). Twelve-day-old plants, with two leaves, were treated with 24-epibrassinolide (0.005 and 0.25 mg dm−3) with the use of the leaf infiltration technique. The solutions were injected into the first (older) and second (younger) leaf using a plastic syringe without needle. This method allows applying of the solution directly to the leaf apoplast space and thus results in better hormone penetration within the plant tissue. Three days after hormonal treatment, the fast fluorescence kinetics of chlorophyll a (PS II efficiency) was measured in the first and second leaves of 15-day-old plants. The plants were then immediately exposed to a high temperature (42°C, 3 h in darkness), and the PS II efficiency was measured 30 min after heat stress. For the third time, PS II efficiency was measured in the first and second leaves of 22-day-old plants (7 days after heat shock). The plants continued to grow in a greenhouse for the next 20 days until the seventh leaf was fully expanded and then the following physiological measurements were performed: PS II efficiency, dark respiration, metabolic activity and brassinosteroid content. Dry weight and the surface area of the seventh leaf were also measured. The plants were then transferred to the soil in the field and finally yield parameters were counted: the fresh weight of the plant (aboveground part) after harvesting, the number of spikes and seeds per plant, the weight of 1,000 seeds (g) and seed yield per plant (g).

Preparation of hormonal and control solutions

The 4.1 mM stock solution of 24-epibrassinolide (Sigma-Aldrich, Poznań, Poland) was prepared in 50% ethanol and this stock was diluted with distilled water to obtain a final concentration of 0.005 and 0.25 mg dm−3 BR27 used for treatments. Control plants were treated with water containing traces of hormone solvent (ethanol). Ethanol concentration in all working solutions was adjusted to 0.00625% (v/v) to match the amount of ethanol present in the solution with the highest concentration of BR27. Additionally, the absolute control (plants without treatment) was also cultured, but since the results of physiological measurements (dark respiration, PS II efficiency) obtained for them were similar to that in ethanol-treated control, these data will not be presented.

Estimation of water capacity of the apoplast and calculation of 24-epibrassinolide content after application to the first and second leaves

To calculate the amount of 24-epibrassinolide injected into the apoplast of one leaf, the water capacity of the apoplast of the first and second leaves was estimated. A leaf of a 12-day-old seedling was cut off, weighed (Mass 1), injected with water and weighed again (Mass 2). Water capacity of the apoplast = (Mass 2 − Mass 1)/0.998 (water density at 20°C). In the first leaf, the average water apoplast capacity was 0.05 cm3 and for the second 0.04 cm3 (calculated based on 7 replicates, SE ±0.01 for both leaves). Based on this, the approximate amount of 24-epibrassinolide injected into leaf apoplast was mathematically calculated and expressed in ng per fresh weight (Mass 1) of leaf (Table 1).

Table 1 Brassinosteroids in barley after injections of BR27 to the first and second leaf

Extraction, purification and determination of brassinosteroids

Endogenous brassinosteroids were extracted and quantified using HPLC–MS technique as described previously in Swaczynová et al. (2007) and Janeczko and Swaczynová (2010). Samples of every fresh seventh leaf of barley (0.5 g) were taken for analysis. The following brassinosteroids were analysed: 24-epibrassinolide, brassinolide, castasterone, 24-epicastasterone, 28-homobrassinolide and 28-homocastasterone. The analysis was done in three replicates (1 replicate = sample from 2 leaves).

Measurements of photosystem II efficiency (chlorophyll a fast fluorescence)

Chlorophyll a fast fluorescence giving information about PS II efficiency was measured using a Plant Efficiency Analyzer (PEA; Hansatech Ltd., King’s Lynn, Norfolk, England) with an excitation light intensity of 3 mmol m−2 s−1 (peak 650 nm). The leaves were measured after 30 min of adaptation to darkness (clips with a 4-mm diameter hole) at a temperature of 20°C. Fluorescence intensity was measured with a PIN-photodiode, and changes in fast fluorescence were registered during illumination for a time from 10 μs to 1 s. During the initial 300 μs, data were collected every 10 μs and, after this period, the frequency of measurements was reduced automatically. Based on the fluorescence curves obtained, technical fluorescence parameters were extracted using a software (Handy PEA Software Ver: v1.30, Hansatech Instruments Ltd.) and calculated according to Strasser et al. (2000). Based on data extracted from the fast fluorescence transient, the following parameters of PS II efficiency (phenomenological fluxes or phenomenological activities) were calculated based on Strasser et al. (2000): energy absorption by antennas ABS/CSm; energy flux for trapping (energy transferred to reaction centre) TRo/CSm; energy flux for electron transport ETo/CSm; energy dissipation (energy lost as a heat) DIo/CSm, where CSm is the cross section of the sample. The analysis was done in 20 replicates (1 replicate = 1 leaf).

Measurements of metabolic activity (heat production)

Metabolic activity was measured as heat production from barley leaves using an isothermal calorimeter (TAM III; Thermometric, Järfälla, Sweden) at 20°C; 20 cm3 ampoules equipped with lids, which enable natural air exchange, were used. The seventh leaf was cut off from the plant and placed in a glass vessel with 0.1 cm3 of water and then into a calorimetric ampoule. The reference ampoule contained a vessel with only water. Data on heat production were collected for 20 min. An example of heat curve production is shown in Fig. 1. After measurement, leaf area and DW were estimated. Based on data recorded by TAM Assistant software (SciTech Software AB, Thermometric AB), the following parameters were defined (see Fig. 1):

Fig. 1
figure 1

A typical curve of metabolic activity (heat production) for a developed plant leaf; measurement at temperature 20°C. Parameters of metabolic activity (HP) are shown

HPmax :

the highest value of heat production recorded during 20 min (mW)

HPAREA, T=20 min :

the area (integral) of heat production under the curve recorded during 20 min (mJ)

HPAREA max :

the area (integral) of heat production under the curve recorded to the moment of reaching maximal value of heat production (mJ).

HPmax is most often used to express plant metabolic activity (Criddle et al. 1989; Smith et al. 2000; Stokłosa et al. 2006). Parameters: HPAREA, T=20 min and HPAREA max are proposed and calculated in this study to interpret heat emission curves (Fig. 1). Values of heat production were expressed per 0.1 g of leaf DW (Table 3), as well as per leaf area (50 cm2). The analysis was done in five replicates (1 replicate = 1 leaf).

Measurements of dark respiration intensity

The dark respiration of the seventh leaf was measured with an infrared gas analyser for CO2 (LCA-2, Analytical Development Corp., UK) with a Parkinson PLC(N) assimilation chamber. The airflow through the assimilation chamber [350 μmol CO2 mol−1 (of the air)] amounted to 350 cm3 min−1. Measurements were performed at a temperature of 25°C in darkness. Values of dark respiration intensity were expressed per 0.1 g of leaf DW (Table 3), as well as leaf area (50 cm2). The analysis was done in five replicates (1 replicate = 1 leaf).

Measurements of leaf dry weight and area

The seventh leaf area was measured with the use of a CI-202 Area Meter (CiD Inc., USA); then the leaves were dried at 60°C for 72 h and weighted. The measurements were done in five replicates (1 replicate = 1 leaf).

Yield components

Plants were harvested and the following yield parameters were counted: the fresh weight of the plant (aboveground part), the number of spikes and seeds per plant, the weight of 1,000 seeds (g) and seed yield per plant (g). Estimation of yield was done for 20 plants per treatment.

Results

Brassinosteroid content in barley

After infiltration of the first and second leaves of barley with 24-epibrassinolide at concentrations of 0.005 and 0.25 mg dm−3, the content of this hormone in the apoplast of the treated leaf tissue amounted to 2 and 100 ng g−1 FW, respectively (Table 1). In the seventh leaf of control barley, two important brassinosteroids—brassinolide and castasterone—were detected (Table 1). 24-Epibrassinolide was found only in trace amounts. The content of 24-epibrassinolide in the seventh leaf increased to an easily detectable level in BR27-treated plants (Table 1). The content of 24-epibrassinolide in the seventh leaf did not differ between plants treated with BR27 at concentrations of 0.005 and 0.25 mg dm−3. The content of brassinolide and castasterone in BR27-treated plants was similar to that of the control. 24-Epicastasterone, 28-homobrassinolide and 28-homocastasterone were not detected in barley.

PS II efficiency of barley seedlings before and after heat shock

In 15-day-old barley, infiltration of the first and second leaves with BR27 generally had no impact on PSII efficiency (Table 2). Only the amount of energy dissipated as heat in the second leaf increased. Heat shock in control plants caused damage to the PS II efficiency of leaves (Table 2). The absorption of energy (ABS/CSm), energy flux for trapping (TRo/CSm) and energy flux for electron transport (ETo/CSm) significantly decreased (Table 2). For example, ETo/CSm decreased by about 89% for the first leaf and 85% for the second in comparison to the values noted before heat stress. Seven days after stress in the first leaf of control, the values of ABS/CSm, TRo/CSm and ETo/CSm increased in comparison to the values noted just after heat shock by about 76, 161 and 296%, respectively, remaining however still lower than for control before stress. In contrast, in the second leaf, these values continued to decrease. ETo/CSm just after heat shock decreased by about 85% as compared to the control before stress, whereas after 7 days the decrease was by about 89%.

Table 2 Efficiency of PS II of barley plants after treatment with 24-epibrassinolide—impact of heat stress

The protective effect of BR27 on PSII efficiency was observed for a concentration of 0.25 mg dm−3 in the first leaf, but not in the second (Table 2). For the first leaf, the values of energy flux for electron transport just after heat shock decreased by about 80% as compared to the values before stress, while after 7 days it was only 33% lower than values noted before stress. A similar tendency was noticed for lower concentrations of BR27, though statistically insignificant.

PSII efficiency, metabolic activity and dark respiration in the seventh leaf of barley plants

After approximately 4 weeks from the moment of heat shock, PSII efficiency measured on the seventh leaf in 42-day-old plants did not differ in control and BR27-treated plants (Table 2). In addition to PS II efficiency, metabolic activity and dark respiration of the seventh leaf were measured. Calorimetric studies on the seventh leaf showed that metabolic activity, calculated per of 0.1 g DW, decreased in 24-epibrassinolide-treated barley (Table 3). In plants treated with a higher concentration of BR27, the values of the heat production parameters such as HPmax and HPAREA, T=20 min, which represent cell metabolic activity, significantly decreased by about 17 and 20% (Table 3). HPAREA max also showed a tendency to decrease, though statistically insignificant. A decrease in the values of metabolic activity was also observed in plants treated with 0.005 mg dm−3 BR27, but statistical significance was found only for HPAREA, T=20 min (value lower then control by about 12%). When all the aforementioned parameters were expressed per leaf area, they showed no differences between the BR27-treated plants and the control (data not shown).

Table 3 Metabolic activity (heat production) and dark respiration per 0.1 g−1 DW of the seventh leaf of barley treated with 24-epibrassinolide by infiltration of the first and second leaf at the stage of seedling

In plants treated with BR27 at a concentration of 0.25 mg dm−3, dark respiration of the seventh leaf (calculated per 0.1 g DW) was 41% lower then in the control (Table 3). The dark respiration of plants treated with 0.005 mg dm−3 BR27 also decreased, but the difference was statistically insignificant (Table 3). In contrast to the parameters of metabolic activity, the same tendency was observed and statistically proved if the data were calculated per leaf area (data not shown).

There were no statistically significant differences in DW and leaf area of the seventh leaf of 42-day-old plants between the control and BR27-treated barley (data not shown). Only a slight tendency toward decrease in the leaf area and mass was observed for barley treated previously with a higher BR concentration.

Barley yield components

Infiltration of leaves with 24-epibrassinolide at a concentration of 0.005 mg dm−3 had no statistically significant impact on yield; however, some tendency to decrease was observed (Table 4). Leaf infiltration with 50 times higher concentration of BR27 negatively affected barley yield. The plants had lower fresh mass and produced less number of tillers. The number of seeds per spike, the number of seeds per plant and the final yield were lower by about 16, 43 and 39%, respectively, in comparison to the control (Table 4).

Table 4 Seed yield of barley treated with 24-epibrassinolide by infiltration of the first and second leaf at the stage of seedling

Discussion

According to data in the literature available, this is the first time that an analysis of brassinosteroid content in barley has been performed. Brassinosteroids—brassinolide and castasterone—were detected in barley leaves. 24-epibrassinolide was found only in trace amounts in control plants. Among the Poaceae family, brassinosteroids are found in Lolium perenne L., Oryza sativa L., Phalaris canariensis L., Secale cereale L., Triticum aestivum L. and Zea mays L. (Bajguz and Tretyn 2003; Janeczko and Swaczynová 2010).

In biological experiments BRs move only slowly, if at all, after their application to leaves by plant spraying (Nishikawa et al. 1994, 1995; Symons et al. 2008; Janeczko and Swaczynová 2010). Significant in this case may be the presence of the cuticle barrier and problems in the penetration of hormone solution into the leaf. In the present study, we bypassed the barrier of the leaf surface and injected BR27 directly into the apoplast of the first and second leaves of barley seedlings using the leaf infiltration method. This way of application resulted in an increase in the 24-epibrassinolide content in the newly developed leaves (the seventh leaf was analysed). Apparently then, 24-epibrassinolide was transported from leaf to leaf. Interestingly, however, its content in the seventh leaves was similar after applying low and high BR27 concentration to two-leaf seedlings. A similar phenomenon was noticed in our earlier study, where no significant difference in 24-epibrassinolide content in wheat leaves was observed after BR27 application (0.1 or 2.0 μM) to the roots (Janeczko and Swaczynová 2010). Apparently, plants regulate the uptake or transport of applied brassinosteroids. 24-Epibrassinolide might then be transported from leaf to leaf under the control of the internal mechanism of BR homeostasis. Exogenously applied BRs undergo various chemical modifications, i.e. hydroxylation and glucosylation in the side chain or conjugation with fatty acids (Sembdner et al. 1994; Asakawa et al. 1996; Srivastava 2002). These metabolites probably play a role in BR homeostasis and some of them may represent a way to store brassinosteroids (Srivastava 2002). Cell cultures of Ornithopus sativus Brot. transformed the exogenously applied 24-epibrassinolide to produce fatty acids (lauric, myristic and palmitic) conjugates with 3,24-bisepibrassinolide, esterified at the 3β-position (Kolbe et al. 1995). The non-conjugated compound, 3,24-bisepibrassinolide, was isolated from the culture medium, whereas the fatty acyl esters were present within the cells (Kolbe et al. 1995). It is possible that in our experiment the mechanisms controlling BR homeostasis allowed transport of only part of the applied 24-epibrassinolide. The rest of it could be immobilised at the place of application. It is also conceivable that BR27 was conjugated to fatty acid or glycoside forms that are impossible to detect using our protocol.

In no-stress conditions, brassinosteroids can stimulate net photosynthesis and ribulose bisphosphate activity of plants (Braun and Wild 1984; Fariduddin et al. 2003; Hayat et al. 2000). In cucumber, BR27 increases the quantum yield of PS II electron transport, which is due to a significant increase in photochemical quenching (Yu et al. 2004). In the present experiment, no influence of BR27 on the studied parameters of photosystem II was found in barley seedlings before stress. Similarly, no influence of 24-epibrassinolide on the improvement of energy utilisation in PS II in oilseed rape seedlings grown in vitro had been noticed earlier (Janeczko et al. 2005). However, under stress conditions (heavy metal application, pathogen infection), BR increased the values of energy flux for trapping and for electron transport (Janeczko et al. 2005; Skoczowski et al. 2010). In the present study, 24-epibrassinolide favoured PS II recovery in barley damaged by high temperature. It is possible that this is a non-specific mode of BR action on PSII under various stresses. Interestingly, the BR effect was dependent on which barley leaf was being treated. BR protection was observed for the older (first) leaf, while the younger leaf was insensitive to BR27 action and simultaneously less capable of post-stress regeneration. The mechanism of this phenomenon remains unexplained, but one of the hypothetical possibilities is that in younger tissue an insufficient number of receptors developed to accept steroid ligand and activate the signal transduction pathways responsible for brassinosteroid-induced counter-stress changes in cells.

The mechanisms of plant adaptation and defence against thermal stress have been well known (Berry and Bjorkman 1980; Maestri et al. 2002). However, the participation of BR in the onset of resistance (especially, for the protection of photosynthesis) to these kinds of stressors is only partially explained. Higher values of net photosynthesis rate, better survival and finally higher yield were found in heat-stressed tomato plants treated with BR (Singh and Shono 2005). Transpiration rate and stomata conductance, increased by BR27, probably reduce the temperature of leaves. Brassinosteroids at high temperature can regulate the production of heat shock proteins in tomato and oilseed rape (Dhaubhadel et al. 1999, 2002; Singh and Shono 2005). Heat shock proteins synthesised to protect cellular protein structures against destruction play a crucial role in the adaptation to stress (Sarhan and Perras 1987; Vierling 1991, Ortiz and Cardemil 2001; Korotaeva et al. 2001). Small chloroplast HSP protect electron transport pathways against heat stress (Heckathorn et al. 1998). Dhaubhadel et al. (1999, 2002) and Singh and Shono (2005) did not study the synthesis of HSP in chloroplasts separately, but it is likely that this HSP contributes to the reduction of damage and better regeneration of photosynthetic pathways. These mechanisms appear most likely to explain the protective effect of BR on photosynthetic pathways under heat stress in our experiment on barley. On the other hand, BR also has an impact on the activity of antioxidative enzymes (Mazorra and Núñez 2000; Mazorra et al. 2002). The high temperature contributes to hyper-reduction in the electron transportation chain, which leads to the production of free radicals (Dash and Mohanty 2002). For example, reactive oxygen species inactivate cellular enzymes and disorganise membrane functions (lipid peroxidation and fatty acid de-esterification). The antioxidant defence system of the plant comprises a variety of antioxidant molecules and enzymes (superoxide dismutase, ascorbate peroxidase, catalase) (Chaitanya et al. 2002). Antioxidative enzymes are an important element of protective systems in various types of stresses, including thermal stress (Miller-Morey and Van Dolah 2004; Almeselmani et al. 2006). As our preliminary experiment shows, spraying barley with BR27 increases catalase activity after heat shock (Pociecha and Janeczko 2008). Similar data concerning antioxidative enzymes were obtained for tomato subjected to heat stress (Mazorra and Núñez 2000; Mazorra et al. 2002). Reduction in chlorophyll content and membrane damage, with an increase in ion leakage, is also a result of high-temperature stress (El-Shintinawy et al. 2004). Brassinosteroids reduce cell membrane permeability and prevent chlorophyll degradation in response to low temperature stresses (Krishna 2003; Janeczko et al. 2007a, b). It is very likely that BR action may be similar also in the case of plants exposed to heat shock.

The effect of BR on PSII efficiency discussed above pertained to the first and second leaves of barley seedlings subjected to high-temperature stress. The same energy flow measurements in PSII conducted on newly expanded seventh leaf no longer showed any effect of 24-epibrassinolide. The PSII efficiency of the seventh leaf was similar in plants treated with brassinosteroid and in the control plants, whereas, for example, metabolic activity decreased in plants after treatment with higher concentration of 24-epibrassinolide.

Calorimetric measurements of heat production, which reflect the intensity of plant metabolic activity, showed decreased values of all calculated HP parameters and it was particularly noticeable in plants treated with higher BR concentration. According to other studies, metabolic activity is increased in plants as a result of pathogen infection (Płażek and Rapacz 2000; Janeczko et al. 2007b). Cold-hardened callus demonstrate higher frost resistance, which is accompanied by the highest heat emission and dry matter accumulation, as well as the best morphology characteristics (Rapacz and Żur 1996). Salinity stress lowers the metabolic activity of barley (Baltruschat et al. 2008). Calorimetric methods are useful tests for the detection of resistance to fenoxaprop and diclofop in wild oat biotypes (Stokłosa et al. 2006). Resistant biotypes treated with these herbicides shows higher metabolic activity than susceptible ones. In all the studies mentioned above, calorimetric measurements were useful as a method complementary to other physiological measurements for examining metabolic activity and the viability of plants. In our study, plants showed lower values of metabolic activity parameters, which correlated with the low intensity of dark respiration and with a lower yield of barley.

The value of all parameters, both HPmax, universally used in the literature, as well as the additionally proposed parameters (HPAREA, T=20 min and HPAREA max), which provide an interpretation of the heat effect curve, showed a downward trend in barley treated with BR. Note that the statistical significance of the difference from the control was obtained only for HPmax and HPAREA, T=20 min. Due to the correlation between HP and the crop yield as mentioned above, these parameters could be useful in the future to predict barley yield, especially in experiments where the plants are subjected to stress factors or to the actions of various regulators.

An important part of plant metabolic activity is the process of dark respiration. The relationship between plant yield and dark respiration measured on leaves may be different for various species (or even cultivars) and may depend on plant growth conditions. Wheat cultivars with higher yield potential are characterised by low intensity of dark respiration in comparison to cultivars with lower yield (Jiang et al. 2000). Two cultivars of barley, ‘Graphic’ and ‘Kym’, with different yield potential have similar leaf dark respiration intensity; however, the respiration intensity in cultivar with a higher yield potential (‘Graphic’) showed a tendency to decrease (Tambussi et al. 2005). In our experiment, hormonal treatment caused a decrease in dark respiration, which theoretically could result in higher crop yield, but surely respiration is not the only process modified by biologically active brassinosteroid that is capable of influencing plant yield.

Generally, leaf infiltration with a higher hormone concentration at the seedling phase ultimately resulted in lower crop yield. The same or even higher concentration of brassinosteroids applied via a less invasive method with a limited possibility of hormone penetration inside tissues (like spraying) may have a beneficial effect on the yield of other Poaceae plants such as wheat and rice (Ramraj et al. 1997; Janeczko et al. 2010). For example, in case of drought, homobrassinolide stimulates wheat yield, which is manifested by an increase in the number of grains per spike, spikes per m2 and weight of 1,000 grains (Sairam 1994). In case of salt-stress, 24-epibrassinolide applied via spraying in a greenhouse experiment stimulates plant biomass production and increases leaf area, but without any effect on grain yield in wheat cv. S-24 (salt resistant) and MH-97 (salt sensitive) (Shahbaz et al. 2008). Root application of this hormone results in an enhanced total grain yield and 100-grain weight of both salt-stressed cultivars referred to above (Ali et al. 2008).

To conclude, in spite of the initially positive effect of BR27 (at higher concentration) on PSII efficiency of barley, especially under high-temperature stress, its aftereffect on leaf metabolism and yield was negative. The amount of hormone that moved to newly expanded leaves after exogenous application was the same in plants treated with higher and lower BR27 concentration. Notwithstanding that, some physiological processes, as well as yield, differed much more from those of the control in plants treated with BR27 at higher concentration. Apparently, BR27 in this case modified metabolic cell pathways in a manner, which resulted in an unfavourable aftereffect on the efficiency of some physiological processes and plant yield.