Abstract
It is well known that neuronal networks are capable of transmitting complex spatiotemporal information in the form of precise sequences of neuronal discharges characterized by recurrent patterns. At the same time, the synchronized activity of large ensembles produces local field potentials that propagate through highly dynamic oscillatory waves, such that, at the whole brain scale, complex spatiotemporal dynamics of electroencephalographic (EEG) signals may be associated to sensorimotor decision making processes. Despite these experimental evidences, the link between highly temporally organized input patterns and EEG waves has not been studied in detail. Here, we use a neural mass model to investigate to what extent precise temporal information, carried by deterministic nonlinear attractor mappings, is filtered and transformed into fluctuations in phase, frequency and amplitude of oscillatory brain activity. The phase shift that we observe, when we drive the neural mass model with specific chaotic inputs, shows that the local field potential amplitude peak appears in less than one full cycle, thus allowing traveling waves to encode temporal information. After converting phase and amplitude changes obtained into point processes, we quantify input–output similarity following a threshold-filtering algorithm onto the amplitude wave peaks. Our analysis shows that the neural mass model has the capacity for gating the input signal and propagate selected temporal features of that signal. Finally, we discuss the effect of local excitatory/inhibitory balance on these results and how excitability in cortical columns, controlled by neuromodulatory innervation of the cerebral cortex, may contribute to set a fine tuning and gating of the information fed to the cortex.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The analysis of many brain signals ranging from the microscopic scale of single neurons (Celletti et al. 1999; Segundo 2003) to the mesoscale of large neuronal populations within, e.g., cortical columns (Stam 2005; Myers and Kozma 2018) has reinforced the hypothesis of a nonlinear source of complexity in brain dynamics (Korn and Faure 2003). Single neuron experimental recordings show that precise neuronal discharges can be arranged in sequences of spikes that appear much more often than expected by chance (Abeles and Gerstein 1988; Tetko and Villa 2001; Reinoso et al. 2016). The relationship between subsequent action potentials forms complex patterns typically associated with nontrivial dynamics and fractal dimensionality (Longtin 1993; Iglesias et al. 2007; Fukushima et al. 2007; Iglesias and Villa 2010). At the scale of neuronal dynamics, it has been hypothesized that complex information can be transmitted through neural networks (Asai et al. 2008), even in the presence of noise (Asai and Villa 2008), thanks to their sensitivity to the temporal precision in sequences of spikes.
Following the general encoding principle that neurons that are more strongly depolarized are going to fire earlier than the neurons that are less optimally stimulated (von der Malsburg and Schneider 1986; Singer 1993; Fries et al. 2008), synchronized inputs received by selected cell assemblies are able to generate waves of depolarization following the complex dynamics (Makarenko and Llinás 1998; Gollo et al. 2010; Qu et al. 2014) introduced by the input. Thus, subcortical inputs may ignite the activity producing oscillatory activity in a wide range of frequencies that may propagate throughout the cerebral cortex (Nunez 1995; Buzsáki et al. 2012). Neuronal oscillations suggest that the synchronization relationships between brain signals may be a sign for computation and communication (Singer 1999; Brette 2012; Malagarriga et al. 2015a, b). Experimental observations in electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) have revealed that event-related oscillations can be robust to perturbations and fluctuations in wave amplitude becoming markers of cognitive processing (Rubino et al. 2006; Gross et al. 2013; Tal and Abeles 2018; Tewarie et al. 2018). These studies suggest that amplitude and latency modulation of oscillations may be coupled to functional connectivity because increased amplitude would necessarily mean increased synchrony in the depolarization of the cell assemblies. In this way, functional brain networks should be able to reorganize and coordinate cortical activity at a high temporal resolution (Tal and Abeles 2018).
We analyze here the phase-amplitude responses of a cortical column, simulated by a neural mass model (Jansen et al. 1993), receiving a discrete time series of pulsed inputs. Using a mean-field approach, we investigate to what extent precise temporal information, carried by deterministic nonlinear attractor mappings, is filtered and transformed into fluctuations in phase, frequency and amplitude of oscillatory brain activity. We explore the hypotheses that different classes of amplitude output wave peaks may form multiple point processes capable of transmitting dynamical features of the input time series and that amplitude threshold-filtering alone may also produce relevant point processes associated with the input dynamics. We show that the output activity produced by the neuronal mass model is highly dependent on the internal dynamics of the input point process and no same threshold or same amplitude criteria can be applied to the input dynamics. On the basis of our results, we suggest that local excitatory/inhibitory balance and excitability of cortical columns may contribute to set a fine tuning and gating of the ascending information in the cerebral cortex.
Methods
Neural mass model
We consider here the Jansen-Rit model, a neural mass model (NMM) corresponding to a cortical column (Jansen et al. 1993; Jansen and Rit 1995). This model considers three interconnected neural populations formed by long projecting pyramidal neurons (population P), and two classes of local projecting neurons (interneurons) characterized by their excitatory (population E) and inhibitory (population I) feedback loops within the column. The E population projects to the P population, the I population projects to the P population, and in turn the P population sends projections to both E and I populations (Fig. 1). All values of the parameters chosen for the dynamical equations of this study are based on previous analyses (Malagarriga et al. 2014, 2015b).
The dynamics of a single NMM is based on a mean field approximation (Malagarriga et al. 2015b). Each excitatory coupling is described by a second-order differential operator \(L(y_{n}(t);a)\) transforming the mean input firing rate, \(p^j_m(t)\) from all j afferences, to a mean membrane potential \(y_n(t)\):
where the subscript n refers to either excitatory populations P and E. Constant terms A and a are referred to excitatory couplings, with \(A=3.25\) mV corresponding to the maximum value of the excitatory postsynaptic potential and constant term \(a=100\,{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}\) associated with the membrane time constants and dendritic delays. The mean input firing rate \(p^j_m(t)\) is computed by a sigmoidal transfer function S of the net average membrane potential \(m^j(t)\) of all j afferences, that is \(p^j_m(t) = C_{i=1\ldots 4} S[m^j(t)]\). Coefficients \(C_1 = 133.5\), \(C_2 = 0.8C_1\), \(C_3 = 0.25C_1\) and \(C_4 = 0.25C_1\)) weight the synaptic efficiency. The sigmoidal transformation is such that
where \(e_0=2.5\,{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}\) is a value corresponding to the maximum firing rate of the neural population, \(\nu _0=6\) mV is a voltage reference associated with 50% of the firing rate, and \(r=0.56\,{\mathrm{mV}}^{-1}\) is the steepness of this sigmoidal transformation.
We can similarly define \(L(y_{n}(t);b)\), with subscript n referred to the population I of local inhibitory cells, and constant terms \(B=22\,{\mathrm{mV}}\) and \(b=50\,{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}\) referred to inhibitory couplings transforming the mean input firing rate \(p^k_m(t)\) to a mean membrane potential \(y_n(t)\):
with \(p^k_m(t) = C_{i=1\ldots 4} S[m^k(t)]\) and \(m^k(t)\) the net average membrane potential of all k afferences to I.
In the absence of external inputs we consider that each column receives an excitatory input \({\bar{p}}=155\,{\mathrm{s}}^{-1}\) produced by a constant background mean firing rate. With all these elements, the equations of the model read:
This model produces an internal oscillatory activity in the NMM centered on 10.8 Hz, which is a frequency that fits the alpha range of the EEG and LFP.
External inputs
In order to test the capacity of transmitting precise complex temporal information through cortical columns modeled by NMM, we have considered time series \(x_n\) of external pulses generated by the Chen and Ueta, Hénon, and Zaslavsky dynamical systems calculated in addition to the constant background frequency input. These dynamical systems were chosen on the basis of our previous studies at the neuronal scale dynamics (Asai and Villa 2008).
The Chen and Ueta (referred to as ChenUeta) system equations (Chen and Ueta 1999) can be writen as:
where \(a_{CU}=35.0\), \(b_{CU} =3.0\) and \(c_{CU}=28.0\) and with initial conditions \(x(0)=3.0\) and \(y(0)=3.0\). We considered the Poincaré map defined by \(dz/dt =0\), with a tracking of x(t), whose discrete form provides the time series \({x_n}\).
The Hénon mapping (Hénon 1976) is defined by:
where \(a_{H}=1.15\) and \(b_{H}=0.3\). Iterations of the map allow to obtain the values of the point processes, corresponding to discrete time series \({x_n}\).
The equations for the Zaslavsky map (Zaslavsky 1978) are:
where \(x,y \in {\mathbb {R}}\), \(\mu = \frac{1-e^{-\gamma }}{\gamma }\), \(v = 400/3\), \(\gamma = 3.0\) and \(\epsilon = 0.1\). The initial conditions are \(x_0 = 0.3\) and \(y_0 = 0.3\). Iterations of the map allow to obtain the values of the discrete time series \({x_n}\).
For each dynamical system, we transform the information contained in the Poincaré sections (Parker and Chua 1989) defined by the 2D projection of the points \(x_n\), \(x_{n+1}\) of the dynamical systems into a new time series \(\omega _n\) derived to avoid negative values, as follows:
where K is a constant to make all values positive, i.e., \(K = min{(x_{n+1} - x_n)} + 0.1\). The time series \(\omega _n\) corresponds to the Inter-Pulse Interval (IPI) of the external input. Hence, from \(\omega _n\) we derive the time series \(t_k\), corresponding to the absolute times of occurrence of the external pulses. The time series \(t_k\) is used to transform the external input into the series of Gaussian-shaped pulses, Each cortical column receives a time dependent excitatory input \(I(t) = {\bar{p}} + p_{T}(t)\), where \({\bar{p}}\) is the mean background activity and \(p_{T}(t)\) is a mean spike density of Gaussian-shaped pulses described by
where \(\xi = 2\) Hz is a constant frequency, \(\delta =500\) ms is a time constant, and \(t_k\) corresponding to the timing of a specific train of external input pulses. The LFP generated by the NMM is \(y = y_E(t) - y_I(t)\), which is the signal that is analyzed further throughout this study (Fig. 1).
Computational analysis
The external input time series were generated with a time step resolution of 0.1 ms. All events falling within the interval 0–1 ms were ignored. The simulation of the model had an integration time step of 1 ms. We used Heun’s method to integrate the NMM model equations (García-Ojalvo and Sancho 1999) and a general purpose tool, called XPPAUT, for numerically solving and analyzing dynamical systems (Ermentrout 2002, 2012) to extract the Poincaré maps. Delay embeddings were constructed with a time delay of \(\tau =10\) ms. Different initial conditions were randomly set when performing multiple runs of the simulation. An initial period of 60 s was omitted, unless stated otherwise, to obtain stationary data and avoid any transient effect appearing at the begining of the simulation. Coding-related material and scripts may be requested via email to to “daniel.malagarriga@gmail.com”. The version used here uses several libraries publicly available and it is necessary to set carefully the operating system dependent environment.
Results
We consider the hypothesis that the LFP generated by the NMM filters external contributions and the output activity has wiped out much of the temporal information carried by the external inputs. Firstly, we examine some features of the external input pulse trains and the dependence on the phase delay with respect to intrinsic NMM dynamics. Secondly, we analyze the features of the distribution of the amplitudes of LFP peaks and the dynamics of the corresponding point processes. Thirdly, we analyze the dynamics of the output point processes generated by the sequences of LFP peaks filtered according to an amplitude thresholding operation.
Frequency and phase-related filtering
The three different dynamical systems were tuned in order to generate pulse trains with approximately the same pulse density. Input frequencies were computed over all inter-pulse intervals lasting at least 40 ms (i.e., corresponding to an instantaneous input frequency of 25 pulses/s) as shown in Fig. 2. The actual average (median) external input frequencies were equal to 4.09 (4.24), 4.74 (3.32), and 4.03 (2.53) pulses/s for ChenUeta, Hénon, and Zaslavsky maps, respectively.
The dynamics of the external Zaslavsky (Z.inp), Hénon (H.inp), and ChenUeta (C.inp) pulsed inputs are illustrated by the return maps in the interval 0–800 ms in Fig. 3a, c, e. These signals are processed and integrated with the internal dynamics of the NMM. The dynamics of the corresponding output signals, analog to LFPs, is shown by the delay embedding trajectories and selected Poincaré sections using a time delay of \(\tau =10\) ms (Fig. 3b, d, f). Notice the similarities in the Poincaré sections that suggest a strong filtering effect played by the intrinsic activity of the NMM, that is characterized by an oscillation at a frequency of 10.8 Hz.
We investigate the effect of applying external pulses with respect to specific phase delays of the NMM oscillatory period (Fig. 4a). Two consecutive pulses were applied at characteristic phase delays (\(\pi /2\), \(\pi\), \(3\pi /2\), \(2\pi\), e.g. Fig. 4b, c). The output response was characterized by peaks with latencies translated into phase delays. Figure 4d shows the input–output phase difference for all combinations of first (IP1) and second (IP2) inter-pulse intervals. We observed that high amplitude peaks in the output signals were associated with pulsed inputs, whereas low amplitude peaks followed the internal dynamics of NMM. These results suggest that the output signals may peak at times that reliably follow the input dynamics, despite a filtering effect produced by the NMM internal dynamics.
Distribution of LFP peak amplitudes
We analyzed the peak amplitudes of the LFP signals generated by NMM and their distributions for the three dynamical system inputs and a control distribution represented by a Poissonian pulsed input train with a similar intensity of the other time series. Figure 5 shows that in all cases the internal dynamics of NMM generates a multimodal distribution of the LFP peaks. No LFP with amplitudes comprised between 4.75 and 7.25 mV were observed, irrespective of the external input time series. The three highest modes for each kind of pulse inputs, and their labels, are indicated on the probability density curves in Fig. 5, by Z1, Z2, Z3 for Zaslavky, and H1, H2 H3 for Hénon, and so on for ChenUeta and Poisson. All modes characterized by density higher than 0.07 in the probability density curves are presented in Table 1. In this Table it is interesting to notice that all most relevant modes (i.e. Z1, H1, C1 and P1) correspond to an LFP amplitude near 12.12 mV, irrespective of the dynamics of the external pulses. Notice that both modes Z2 and H2 correspond to the same amplitude near 11.12 mV (Fig. 5a, b). Modes C2 and C3 in ChenUeta and mode P2 in Poisson correspond to very low amplitudes of LFP, below 4 mV, in a range that is likely dominated by the background inputs rather than by external pulsed time series (Fig. 5c).
The finding that pulsed inputs from different time series were characterized by similar LFP amplitude modes raised the question whether those LFP waves were also characterized by a similar time distribution. Then, we have generated discrete point processes corresponding to the timings of all LFP waves having a peak amplitude falling within the interval \([\text {mode}-0.15, \text {mode}+0.15]\), which means three time series for the processes corresponding to modes Z1, Z2, Z3 and so on for the other input pulsed distributions. Figure 6 shows the superimposed autocorrelograms for such point processes. Processes Z1 and Z3 (Fig. 6a) show curves peaking at regularly spaced intervals corresponding to the average frequency of the input pulses (period \(\sim 250\) ms, i.e. \(\sim 4\) pulses/s, see Fig. 2). This pattern is very similar to the control condition represented by the Poissonian input pulse train (Fig. 6d) with all three P1, P2, and P3 point processes showing autocorrelogram peaks associated with the mean intensity of the process. Modes H1 and C1 were characterized by the same LFP amplitude of the other principal modes Z1 and P1. On the contrary to the expectations, their autocorrelogram showed limited (in case of H1) or almost no sign of period \(\sim 250\) ms, but periods of 374 and 380 ms in H1 (Fig. 6b) and \(\sim 385\) ms in C1 (Fig. 6c) were observed. It is also interesting to notice that modes Z2 and H2, although characterized by the same amplitude (Table 1), show a very different pattern of their autocorrelogram.
The differences among the various LFP modes is further illustrated by the return maps of the corresponding point processes in Fig. 7. The regular pattern observed for Poissonian inputs shows, in this case, that NMM filters out any time related information and retains only the mean intensity of the process. In the cases of Zaslavsky and ChenUeta pulsed inputs, the regular patterns appear to some extent in the return maps, in agreement with the observation made with the autocorrelograms. In case of Hénon input, even the point process derived from the principal mode of LFP shows less regularity. To this respect, it is interesting to compare the panels of the return maps corresponding to modes P1, Z1, H1, and C1 (Fig. 7 upper row) and observe the differences, despite the fact that these point processes correspond to LFPs characterized by the same amplitude. This analysis shows that selected LFPs according to the amplitudes carry different temporal information. The principal mode retains always an information associated with the mean intensity of the input process and additional information which is related to the time-dependent organization of the specific input pulsed train.
LFP peak thresholding
Figure 5 has shown that the distributions of the LFP amplitudes show multimodal curves with commonalities and characteristic features for each input time series. We consider that an hypothetical threshold T may be set at the output channel of a NMM in order to filter the overall activity and transmit only selected output activity elsewhere in the brain. The thresholding operation is illustrated by Fig. 8. The outcome of this operation is a threshold-filtered point process (oft), labeled Z.oft, H.oft, C.oft and P.oft for Zaslavsky, Hénon, ChenUeta, and Poisson input pulsed trains. In order to determine whether the oft point processes retained temporal information of the corresponding input time series inp we generated a surrogate time series, as a control, by shuffling randomly the inter-pulse intervals of oft and producing a point process labeled sft, with the same first-order time statistics and totally scrambled higher-order timing relations.
We analyzed the return maps of oft and sft output point processes as a function of increasing threshold values. In addition, we considered the output activity following the external input driven by the Poisson pulse train—i.e., P.oft—as a control point process for the nonlinear deterministic mappings. Each row of Fig. 9 shows the return maps, in the interval between 0 and 800 ms, of the point processes corresponding to the peaks of the output signals (big dots in red) filtered by the threshold value indicated on the left of the legend, for selected values of \(T \in [9.0, 11.0, 12.0, 12.5, 13.0, 15.0]\). The small black points for each panel of Fig. 9 correspond to the input point process, as indicated in the heading of the columns. If an output point process follows the dynamics of the input point process, the red dots should overlap, to a large extent, the black points. Notice that for threshold values up to \(T=12.0\) there is a majority of return intervals less than 400 ms for all time series, with little, if any, correspondence between input and output point processes. Threshold values from 12.0 to 13.0 show an increase in the overlap of the return maps between Z.inp versus Z.oft, H.inp versus H.oft, and C.inp versus C.oft.
Figure 9 shows also that the surrogate point processes Z.sft, H.sft, and C.sft show very limited with the corresponding input time series Z.inp, H.inp, and C.inp, but the overlap of several points suggest that 0-order time domain statistics might retain some information carried by the external pulses. The general picture offered by the return maps of the surrogate filtered point processes rather emphasizes the bias introduced by the internal dynamics of the NMM. The comparison between the Poisson output filtered point process P.oft and the nonlinear dynamical mappings Z.inp, H.inp, and C.inp shows that the overlap is almost null. On the contrary, Fig. 9 shows similarities between Z.sft, H.sft, C.sft with P.oft for threshold values \(T\ge 12.5\), as a consequence of the drive due to the internal dynamics of the NMM.
We introduce an index to measure the distance, within a delimited area in the return map space, between an output activity filtered point process and a reference input point process. Let us consider an input point process including \(N+1\) events and \(s_i\) denotes the time interval between the ith event and the \((i+1)\)th one. In a 2-dimensional Euclidean space we consider the return map formed by points \(S_i\) defined by coordinates \(s_i\) and \(s_{i+1}\), \(S_i = (s_i,s_{i+1})\). Let us consider the output activity point process X(T), filtered by threshold T and including \(K+1\) events. Let us denote \(x(T)_j\) the time interval between the jth event and the \((j+1)\)th one. The return map of the threshold-filtered output activity point process is formed by points \(X(T)_j = (x(T)_j, x(T)_{j+1})\). We compute the distance \(d_j^{X(T)}\) for any point j of the output activity map \(X(T)_j\) as its Euclidian distance to the closest point of the reference map \(S_i\), that is
Then, we compute the distance
The distance of the threshold-filtered point process (oft) from the input point process should always be smaller than the distance computed for the corresponding shuffled-filtered point process (sft), if temporal information is retained in the interpulse intervals. Hence, for any threshold T a normalized index for the ChenUeta input point process is defined as \(\langle D_{C}^T \rangle = D_{C.sft}^T / D_{C.oft}^T\) and, in a similar way, the indexes \(\langle D_{H}^T \rangle\), \(\langle D_{Z}^T \rangle\) for Hénon and Zaslavsky input point processes, respectively. In addition, the distance computed for oft should also be smaller than the output activity if the input were triggered by a Poissonian process given the same threshold T, i.e. compared to P.oft. On this basis, we defined another distance index \(\langle {\tilde{D}}_{C}^T \rangle = D_{P.oft}^T / D_{C.oft}^T\) for the ChenUeta input point process, and indexes \(\langle {\tilde{D}}_{H}^T \rangle\), \(\langle {\tilde{D}}_{Z}^T \rangle\) for Hénon and Zaslavsky input point processes, respectively.
We have run the simulations in order to get 10 realizations of each output threshold-filtered point process (oft) and for each one we have produced 10 independent shuffled point processes (sft). For each value of T, between \(T=7\) and \(T=19\), by steps of 0.5, we have rerun the simulations and computed the average normalized distances \(\langle D_{X}^T \rangle\) and \(\langle {\tilde{D}}_{X}^T \rangle\). Then, we computed the distances for any point \(X(T)_j\) with coordinates \(x(T)_j \le 700\,\mathrm {ms}\) and \(x(T)_{j+1} \le 700\,\mathrm {ms}\). For each value of T we computed the confidence intervals of the mean distance and estimated independently whether \(\langle D_{X}^T \rangle < 1\) and \(\langle {\tilde{D}}_{X}^T \rangle < 1\). The rationale is that both normalized distance indexes should be significantly lower than 1 if the oft point process retains some initial time information and is closer to the input nonlinear dynamic mapping than the sft and Poissonian P.oft point processes, given the same value of threshold.
Figure 10 shows the curves of the normalized distance indexes for all input dynamics as a function of threshold T. It is interesting to notice that in case of Zaslavsky Z.oft tended to retain some temporal structure for values \(10 \le T \le 17.5\) (Fig. 10a). We considered three levels of significance for these curves. The highest level, labeled (***), is reached if \(prob(\langle D_{X}^T \rangle < 1) \ge 0.99\)and\(prob(\langle {\tilde{D}}_{X}^T \rangle < 1) \ge 0.99\). The second level, labeled (**), is reached if \(prob(\langle D_{X}^T \rangle < 1\)or\(\langle {\tilde{D}}_{X}^T \rangle < 1) \ge 0.99\)and\(prob(\langle D_{X}^T \rangle < 1\)or\(\langle {\tilde{D}}_{X}^T \rangle < 1) \ge 0.95\). The third level of significance is lower than the previous two and is labeled (*): this level is reached if \(prob(\langle D_{X}^T \rangle < 1) \ge 0.95\)and\(prob(\langle {\tilde{D}}_{X}^T \rangle < 1) \ge 0.95\). According to the above criterion we considered as critical threshold levels only those values of T with both normalized distance indexes being significantly below 1. In case of Hénon mapping the critical values of T were observed in the interval 15.5–17.5 mV (Fig. 10b) and only from 18 to 19 mV for ChenUeta (Fig. 10c). These results show that NMM internal dynamics filtered the temporal structure of the input point process in a selective way, such that different thresholds should be applied to different input point processes in order to recover the temporal structure of interpulse intervals (IPIs).
Discussion
In this study we show, for the first time, that time-coded information, in the form of input pulses associated with nonlinear deterministic time series generated by chaotic mappings, can be reliably transmitted through LFP dynamics despite a complex gating and filtering operated by a NMM of cortical column (Jansen and Rit 1995; Wennekers 2008). This NMM is characterized by rhythmic activity when there is a constant input onto the system and may exhibit quasi-periodic or low dimensional chaotic behavior in the presence of oscillatory (Malagarriga et al. 2015a, b) or pulse-like periodic inputs (Spiegler et al. 2010). The frequency of oscillations is determined by the kinetics of the ensuing population dynamics and it was shown that the whole spectrum of EEG/MEG signals can be reproduced within the oscillatory regime of the NMM by simply changing the population kinetics (David and Friston 2003). We purposely avoided gamma-band frequencies after observing that the studied NMM filtered high frequency bands and no information could be retrieved from its output. The intrinsic dynamics of the NMM influences its capacity to transmit time-coded information because of a resolution limit due to the internal oscillatory dynamics and the resonant interaction with the input. The response of the system becomes highly irregular and highly dependent on the input pulse frequency (Spiegler et al. 2010). Time scales, in the range of the millisecond, imply pulse frequencies of about 10 pulses/s, which is in the range of the NMM dynamics (\(\sim 10\,{\mathrm{Hz}}\)).
It has been shown that stochasticity or chaos in oscillatory elements may play an important role in helping the systems explore small basins of attractor in the vicinity of their local dynamics (Rabinovich and Varona 2011). EEG recordings of healthy volunteers also have shown evidences of chaotic dynamics (Theiler and Rapp 1996; Andrzejak et al. 2001; Gao et al. 2011) with larger complexity than patients with brain dysfunction, such as Alzheimer’s disease (Deng et al. 2017; Nobukawa et al. 2019) or individuals with altered states of consciousness (Mateos et al. 2018). Mean-field approaches to NMM dynamics allow to find conditions for the emergence of deterministic chaos, and relate it to the properties of lumped parameters (Malagarriga et al. 2015b; Montbrió et al. 2015). Nevertheless, the role of irregular, chaotic-like dynamics in the brain is not yet clarified. We raise the hypothesis that such dynamics may be ignited by a nonlinear deterministic series of subcortical inputs fed to cortical columns. Complex spatiotemporal firing patterns have been described experimentally (Abeles 1982a; Villa and Abeles 1990; Villa and Fuster 1992; Abeles et al. 1993; Tetko and Villa 2001; Tal and Abeles 2016) and it was demonstrated that they can propagate with high accuracy in feed-forward networks (Asai et al. 2008; Asai and Villa 2012). Here, we have shown that pulsed inputs associated with Chen and Ueta (Chen and Ueta 1999), Hénon, (Hénon 1976) and Zaslavsky (Zaslavsky 1978) dynamical systems can be processed by a Jansen and Rit oscillator (Jansen and Rit 1995) generating a LFP whose phase pattern and wave amplitude—i.e., the dynamic oscillation signature—carry information contained in the original time series of input pulses.
In some cases, we have observed that point processes associated with selected wave amplitudes could be mainly determined by the internal dynamics of the NMM. For instance, we observed that the most frequent wave amplitudes produced by the Zaslavsky input followed a time distribution very similar to a stochastic (Poissonian) input with the same frequency (see Z1 and P1 in Fig. 6a, d). This finding indicates that the process operated by the NMM may be dominated by the internal dynamics and the NMM acts as an active filter of the temporal information embedded in the sequence of pulsed inputs. However, despite being characterized by the same amplitude (see Table 1), the most frequent wave amplitudes produced by ChenUeta and Hénon inputs displayed a much more complex temporal pattern of distribution (Fig. 6b, c). The physiological interpretation of this finding could be associated with the effect of synaptic plasticity, given the assumption that wave amplitudes scale with the intensity of the depolarization of selected targeted cell assemblies. Studies on memory formation and synaptic plasticity have demonstrated the importance of precise timing relations between the firings of interconnected neurons for use dependent synaptic modifications (Markram et al. 1997; Vogt and Hofmann 2012). Then, the most frequent wave amplitudes would be the best candidate to reinforce synaptic links through spike-timing dependent plasticity mechanisms (Guyonneau et al. 2005; Feldman 2012).
Virtual microcircuits with asynchronous communication protocols can be encoded into symbolic expressions that may give rise to cognitive processes (Bonzon 2017). Accurate selective transmission of population-coded information can be achieved after switching from an asynchronous to an oscillatory state (Akam and Kullmann 2010; Qu et al. 2014). The information can be extracted by means of band-pass filtering implemented with sparsely synchronized network oscillations and temporal filtering by feed-forward inhibition. It is interesting that the facilitation by homeostatic mechanisms that can dynamically regulate the Excitatory/Inhibitory (E/I) balance of brain networks on the basis of inhibitory synaptic plasticity has recently been proposed as a possible explanation of robust information extraction over long timescales (Abeysuriya et al. 2018). This view is also in agreement with the gating hypothesis of multiple signals in cortical networks, where locally evoked inhibition would cancel incoming excitatory signals as a function of fine tuning of the E/I balance by modulating excitatory and inhibitory gains (Vogels and Abbott 2009; Vogt and Hofmann 2012). Indeed, several studies suggest that regulation of the activity and firing dynamics of inhibitory neurons expressing Calcium binding proteins—e.g., parvalbumin (PV), calretinin, calbindin—by monaminergic and cholinergic inputs, from the brainstem and basal forebrain, is likely to be the main source of regulation of the E/I balance (Parnavelas and Papadopoulos 1989; Benes et al. 2000; Caillard et al. 2000; Reynolds et al. 2004; Schwaller et al. 2004; Manseau et al. 2010; Cutsuridis 2012; Furth et al. 2013). In particular, the GABAergic (PV)-positive neurons play a key role in regulating synchronous activity observed in the thalamocortical circuit (Carlén et al. 2012; Albéri et al. 2013; Lintas et al. 2013; Gruart et al. 2016). Long-range projecting GABAergic PV-expressing neurons in the neocortex (Lee et al. 2014) and hypothalamus (Lintas 2014) further emphasize inhibitory synaptic plasticity as an attractive candidate mechanism for controlling the dynamic state of cortical networks involved in gating transitions of awareness and non-conscious perception.
These evidences can be reconciled with an another finding presented in this study, that is the gating obtained by band-pass threshold-filtering. The state of local networks could be changed by neuromodulatory inputs with sufficient spatial and cellular selectivity to operate a fine tuning of the E/I balance. Such gain modulation can be achieved by flexible routing of neural signals and network oscillations (Akam and Kullmann 2010; Zylberberg et al. 2010). We observed that Zaslavsky inputs processed by the NMM produced output waves with any amplitude roughly between 10 and 17 mV with a dynamics sufficiently close to the original input time series (Fig. 10a). Conversely, the output activity after the Hénon input could be reliably retrieved for wave amplitudes falling into a narrower range, i.e. 15.5–17.5 mV (Fig. 10b), and above 18 mV after ChenUeta input (Fig. 10c). A parallel channel for information transmission that is minimally affected by asynchronous distracting inputs occur if the pattern of firing rates is reproduced in the pattern of oscillation amplitudes (Akam and Kullmann 2010). We have already reported that the internal dynamics of the NMM produces a resonance phenomenon that does not wipe out the entire temporal information of the pulsed input dynamical system time series. This phenomenon, akin of spontaneous oscillations generated by interneuron networks (Brunel and Hakim 1999; Whittington and Traub 2003), may convey sensitivity to modulated input patterns such to switch to an asynchronous state following the level of noise or heterogeneity in the temporal pattern of the input signal (Brunel and Hansel 2006). Modulated threshold-filtering gating may offer as a form of multiplexing for neural codes, when multiple inputs are oscillating in different amplitude bands and filtering at the appropriate amplitude can be used to extract selected information from the input pattern.
The gating mechanism we have suggested might also be interpreted as a kind of temporal multiplexing because it can be used to encode and transmit multiple attributes of the input pattern at different timescales. In this way it appears conceptually similar to the multiplexing encoding mechanism described for frequency band filtering, where stimuli that vary relatively slowly relative to the oscillation frequency can route signals with high accuracy (Akam and Kullmann 2010). Temporal multiplexing was also suggested to play a key role to enable disambiguation of stimuli that cannot be discriminated at a single response timescale and to allow the transmission of information in a stable and reliable way in presence of noise and variability (Myers and Kozma 2018; Panzeri et al. 2010). An interrelation between EEG signals and neural firing beyond simple amplitude covariations in both signals provided evidence for a neural basis for stimulus selective and entrained EEG phase patterns (Ng et al. 2013). Motor output and behavioral expression would come up with a state-dependency of temporal multiplexing determined by local interactions and regulatory mechanisms driven by neuromodulatory pathways (Abeles 2014; Vogt and Hofmann 2012).
A further important question posed by our results is how a network of cortical columns, with externally fed driving pulses associated to precise temporal features, can shape complex oscillatory activity in the brain. Oscillations in brain dynamics can travel along brain networks at multiple scales, transiently modulating spiking and excitability as they pass (Schroeder and Lakatos 2009; Ozaki et al. 2012; Muller et al. 2018). Traveling waves may save processing time via distributed information processing through networks of interconnected NMMs and serve a variety of other functions ranging from memory consolidation to binding activity across distributed brain areas (Brama et al. 2015; Tal and Abeles 2016). This feature may result into a mechanism of dynamic network formation in mesoscopic neural populations, where extracted complex spatiotemporal patterns may be a sign for an oscillation based coding paradigm. The next step will consist to study how accurate can be the transmission of dynamical system generated point processes fed to a NMM and transmitted to various topologies of interconnected cortical columns.
References
Abeles M (1982a) Local cortical circuits. An electrophysiological study, studies of brain function, vol 6. Springer, Berlin
Abeles M (1982b) Quantification, smoothing, and confidence limits for single-units’ histograms. J Neurosci Methods 5(4):317–325
Abeles M (2014) Revealing instances of coordination among multiple cortical areas. Biol Cybern 108(5):665–75
Abeles M, Gerstein GL (1988) Detecting spatiotemporal firing patterns among simultaneously recorded single neurons. J Neurophysiol 60(3):909–924
Abeles M, Bergman H, Margalit E, Vaadia E (1993) Spatiotemporal firing patterns in the frontal cortex of behaving monkeys. J Neurophysiol 70(4):1629–1638
Abeysuriya RG, Hadida J, Sotiropoulos SN, Jbabdi S, Becker R, Hunt BAE, Brookes MJ, Woolrich MW (2018) A biophysical model of dynamic balancing of excitation and inhibition in fast oscillatory large-scale networks. PLoS Comput Biol 14(2):e1006007
Akam T, Kullmann DM (2010) Oscillations and filtering networks support flexible routing of information. Neuron 67(2):308–20
Albéri L, Lintas A, Kretz R, Schwaller B, Villa AEP (2013) The calcium-binding protein parvalbumin modulates the firing properties of the reticular thalamic nucleus bursting neurons. J Neurophysiol 109(11):2827–2841
Andrzejak RG, Lehnertz K, Mormann F, Rieke C, David P, Elger CE (2001) Indications of nonlinear deterministic and finite-dimensional structures in time series of brain electrical activity: dependence on recording region and brain state. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlinear Soft Matter Phys 64(6 Pt 1):061907
Asai Y, Villa AEP (2008) Reconstruction of underlying nonlinear deterministic dynamics embedded in noisy spike trains. J Biol Phys 34:325–340
Asai Y, Villa AEP (2012) Integration and transmission of distributed deterministic neural activity in feed-forward networks. Brain Res 1434:17–33
Asai Y, Guha A, Villa AEP (2008) Deterministic neural dynamics transmitted through neural networks. Neural Netw 21(6):799–809
Benes FM, Taylor JB, Cunningham MC (2000) Convergence and plasticity of monoaminergic systems in the medial prefrontal cortex during the postnatal period: implications for the development of psychopathology. Cereb Cortex 10(10):1014–27
Bonzon P (2017) Towards neuro-inspired symbolic models of cognition: linking neural dynamics to behaviors through asynchronous communications. Cogn Neurodyn 11(4):327–353
Brama H, Guberman S, Abeles M, Stern E, Kanter I (2015) Synchronization among neuronal pools without common inputs: in vivo study. Brain Struct Funct 220(6):3721–31
Brette R (2012) Computing with neural synchrony. PLoS Comput Biol 8(6):e1002561
Brunel N, Hakim V (1999) Fast global oscillations in networks of integrate-and-fire neurons with low firing rates. Neural Comput 11(7):1621–71
Brunel N, Hansel D (2006) How noise affects the synchronization properties of recurrent networks of inhibitory neurons. Neural Comput 18(5):1066–110
Buzsáki G, Anastassiou CA, Koch C (2012) The origin of extracellular fields and currents-EEG, ECoG, LFP and spikes. Nat Rev Neurosci 13(6):407–20
Caillard O, Moreno H, Schwaller B, Llano I, Celio MR, Marty A (2000) Role of the calcium-binding protein parvalbumin in short-term synaptic plasticity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97(24):13372–13377
Carlén M, Meletis K, Siegle JH, Cardin JA, Futai K, Vierling-Claassen D, Rühlmann C, Jones SR, Deisseroth K, Sheng M, Moore CI, Tsai LH (2012) A critical role for NMDA receptors in parvalbumin interneurons for gamma rhythm induction and behavior. Mol Psychiatry 17(5):537–548
Celletti A, Froeschlé C, Tetko IV, Villa AEP (1999) Deterministic behaviour of short time series. Meccanica 34:145–152
Chen G, Ueta T (1999) Yet another chaotic attractor. Int J Bifurc Chaos 9(7):1465–1466
Cutsuridis V (2012) Bursts shape the NMDA-R mediated spike timing dependent plasticity curve: role of burst interspike interval and GABAergic inhibition. Cogn Neurodyn 6(5):421–41
David O, Friston KJ (2003) A neural mass model for MEG/EEG: coupling and neuronal dynamics. NeuroImage 20(3):1743–1755
Deng B, Cai L, Li S, Wang R, Yu H, Chen Y, Wang J (2017) Multivariate multi-scale weighted permutation entropy analysis of EEG complexity for Alzheimer’s disease. Cogn Neurodyn 11(3):217–231
Ermentrout B (2002) Simulating, analyzing, and animating dynamical systems: a guide to Xppaut for researchers and students (software, environments, tools). Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia
Ermentrout B (2012) XPPAUT. In: Le Novère N (ed) Computational systems neurobiology. Springer, Berlin, pp 519–531 (chap 17)
Feldman DE (2012) The spike-timing dependence of plasticity. Neuron 75(4):556–71
Fries P, Womelsdorf T, Oostenveld R, Desimone R (2008) The effects of visual stimulation and selective visual attention on rhythmic neuronal synchronization in macaque area v4. J Neurosci 28(18):4823–35
Fukushima Y, Tsukada M, Tsuda I, Yamaguti Y, Kuroda S (2007) Spatial clustering property and its self-similarity in membrane potentials of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons for a spatio-temporal input sequence. Cogn Neurodyn 1(4):305–16
Furth KE, Mastwal S, Wang KH, Buonanno A, Vullhorst D (2013) Dopamine, cognitive function, and gamma oscillations: role of d4 receptors. Front Cell Neurosci 7:102–102
Gao J, Hu J, Tung WW (2011) Complexity measures of brain wave dynamics. Cogn Neurodyn 5(2):171–82
García-Ojalvo J, Sancho J (1999) Noise in spatially extended systems. Springer, New York
Gollo LL, Mirasso C, Villa AEP (2010) Dynamic control for synchronization of separated cortical areas through thalamic relay. Neuroimage 52(3):947–955
Gross J, Hoogenboom N, Thut G, Schyns P, Panzeri S, Belin P, Garrod S (2013) Speech rhythms and multiplexed oscillatory sensory coding in the human brain. PLoS Biol 11(12):e1001752
Gruart A, Delgado-García JM, Lintas A (2016) Effect of parvalbumin deficiency on distributed activity and interactions in neural circuits activated by instrumental learning. In: Wang R, Pan X (eds) Advances in cognitive neurodynamics (V). Springer, Singapore, pp 111–117
Guyonneau R, Van Rullen R, Thorpe SJ (2005) Neurons tune to the earliest spikes through stdp. Neural Comput 17:859–879
Hénon M (1976) A two-dimensional mapping with a strange attractor. Communi Math Phys 50(1):69–77
Iglesias J, Villa AEP (2010) Recurrent spatiotemporal firing patterns in large spiking neural networks with ontogenetic and epigenetic processes. J Physiol Paris 104:137–146
Iglesias J, Chibirova O, Villa A (2007) Nonlinear dynamics emerging in large scale neural networks with ontogenetic and epigenetic processes. Lect Notes Comput Sci 4668:579–588
Jansen BH, Rit VG (1995) Electroencephalogram and visual evoked potential generation in a mathematical model of coupled cortical columns. Biol Cybern 73(4):357–366
Jansen BH, Zouridakis G, Brandt ME (1993) A neurophysiologically-based mathematical model of flash visual evoked potentials. Biol Cybern 68(3):275–283
Korn H, Faure P (2003) Is there chaos in the brain? II. Experimental evidence and related models. C R Biol 326(9):787–840
Lee AT, Vogt D, Rubenstein JL, Sohal VS (2014) A class of gabaergic neurons in the prefrontal cortex sends long-range projections to the nucleus accumbens and elicits acute avoidance behavior. J Neurosci 34(35):11519–11525
Lintas A (2014) Discharge properties of neurons recorded in the parvalbumin-positive (pv1) nucleus of the rat lateral hypothalamus. Neurosci Lett 571:29–33
Lintas A, Schwaller B, Villa AEP (2013) Visual thalamocortical circuits in parvalbumin-deficient mice. Brain Res 1536:107–118
Longtin A (1993) Nonlinear forecasting of spike trains from sensory neurons. Int J Bifurc Chaos 3(03):651–661
Makarenko V, Llinás R (1998) Experimentally determined chaotic phase synchronization in a neuronal system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95(26):15747–52
Malagarriga D, Villa AEP, García-Ojalvo J, Pons AJ (2014) Excitation/inhibition patterns in a system of coupled cortical columns. In: Wermter S, Weber C, Duch W, Honkela T, Koprinkova-Hristova P, Magg S, Palm G, Villa AEP (eds) Artificial neural networks and machine learning—ICANN 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8681. Springer, Cham, pp 651–658
Malagarriga D, García-Vellisca MA, Villa AEP, Buldú JM, García-Ojalvo J, Pons AJ (2015a) Synchronization-based computation through networks of coupled oscillators. Front Comput Neurosci 9:00097
Malagarriga D, Villa AEP, Garcia-Ojalvo J, Pons AJ (2015b) Mesoscopic segregation of excitation and inhibition in a brain network model. PLoS Comput Biol 11(2):e1004007
Manseau F, Marinelli S, Mendez P, Schwaller B, Prince DA, Huguenard JR, Bacci A (2010) Desynchronization of neocortical networks by asynchronous release of GABA at autaptic and synaptic contacts from fast-spiking interneurons. PLoS Biol 8(9):e1000492
Markram H, Lübke J, Frotscher M, Sakmann B (1997) Regulation of synaptic efficacy by coincidence of postsynaptic APs and EPSPs. Science 275(5297):213–5
Mateos DM, Guevara Erra R, Wennberg R, Perez Velazquez JL (2018) Measures of entropy and complexity in altered states of consciousness. Cogn Neurodyn 12(1):73–84
Montbrió E, Pazó D, Roxin A (2015) Macroscopic description for networks of spiking neurons. Phys Rev X 5(2):021028
Muller L, Chavane F, Reynolds J, Sejnowski TJ (2018) Cortical travelling waves: mechanisms and computational principles. Nat Rev Neurosci 19(5):255–268
Myers MH, Kozma R (2018) Mesoscopic neuron population modeling of normal/epileptic brain dynamics. Cogn Neurodyn 12(2):211–223
Ng BSW, Logothetis NK, Kayser C (2013) EEG phase patterns reflect the selectivity of neural firing. Cereb Cortex 23(2):389–98
Nobukawa S, Yamanishi T, Nishimura H, Wada Y, Kikuchi M, Takahashi T (2019) Atypical temporal-scale-specific fractal changes in Alzheimer’s disease EEG and their relevance to cognitive decline. Cogn Neurodyn 13(1):1–11
Nunez P (1995) Neocortical dynamics and human EEG rhythms. Oxford University Press, New York
Ozaki TJ, Sato N, Kitajo K, Someya Y, Anami K, Mizuhara H, Ogawa S, Yamaguchi Y (2012) Traveling EEG slow oscillation along the dorsal attention network initiates spontaneous perceptual switching. Cogn Neurodyn 6(2):185–98
Panzeri S, Brunel N, Logothetis NK, Kayser C (2010) Sensory neural codes using multiplexed temporal scales. Trends Neurosci 33(3):111–20
Parker TS, Chua LO (1989) Poincaré maps. Springer, New York, pp 31–56
Parnavelas JG, Papadopoulos GC (1989) The monoaminergic innervation of the cerebral cortex is not diffuse and nonspecific. Trends Neurosci 12(9):315–9
Qu J, Wang R, Yan C, Du Y (2014) Oscillations and synchrony in a cortical neural network. Cogn Neurodyn 8(2):157–66
Rabinovich MI, Varona P (2011) Robust transient dynamics and brain functions. Front Comput Neurosci 5:24
Reinoso JA, Torrent MC, Masoller C (2016) Emergence of spike correlations in periodically forced excitable systems. Phys Rev E 94(3–1):032218
Reynolds GP, Abdul-Monim Z, Neill JC, Zhang ZJ (2004) Calcium binding protein markers of GABA deficits in schizophrenia-postmortem studies and animal models. Neurotox Res 6(1):57–61
Rubino D, Robbins KA, Hatsopoulos NG (2006) Propagating waves mediate information transfer in the motor cortex. Nat Neurosci 9(12):1549–57
Schroeder CE, Lakatos P (2009) Low-frequency neuronal oscillations as instruments of sensory selection. Trends Neurosci 32(1):9–18
Schwaller B, Tetko IV, Tandon P, Silveira DC, Vreugdenhil M, Henzi T, Potier MC, Celio MR, Villa AEP (2004) Parvalbumin deficiency affects network properties resulting in increased susceptibility to epileptic seizures. Mol Cell Neurosci 25(4):650–663
Segundo JP (2003) Nonlinear dynamics of point process systems and data. Int J Bifurcat Chaos 13(08):2035–2116
Singer W (1993) Synchronization of cortical activity and its putative role in information processing and learning. Annu Rev Physiol 55:349–74
Singer W (1999) Neuronal synchrony: a versatile code for the definition of relations? Neuron 24(1):49–65
Spiegler A, Kiebel SJ, Atay FM, Knösche TR (2010) Bifurcation analysis of neural mass models: impact of extrinsic inputs and dendritic time constants. Neuroimage 52(3):1041–1058
Stam CJ (2005) Nonlinear dynamical analysis of EEG and MEG: review of an emerging field. Clin Neurophysiol 116(10):2266–2301
Tal I, Abeles M (2016) Temporal accuracy of human cortico–cortical interactions. J Neurophysiol 115(4):1810–20
Tal I, Abeles M (2018) Imaging the spatiotemporal dynamics of cognitive processes at high temporal resolution. Neural Comput 30(3):610–630
Tetko IV, Villa AEP (2001) A pattern grouping algorithm for analysis of spatiotemporal patterns in neuronal spike trains. 2. Application to simultaneous single unit recordings. J Neurosci Methods 105(1):15–24
Tewarie P, Hunt BAE, O’Neill GC, Byrne A, Aquino K, Bauer M, Mullinger KJ, Coombes S, Brookes MJ (2018) Relationships between neuronal oscillatory amplitude and dynamic functional connectivity. Cereb Cortex. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhy136
Theiler J, Rapp PE (1996) Re-examination of the evidence for low-dimensional, nonlinear structure in the human electroencephalogram. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 98(3):213–22
Villa AEP, Abeles M (1990) Evidence for spatiotemporal firing patterns within the auditory thalamus of the cat. Brain Res 509(2):325–327
Villa AEP, Fuster JM (1992) Temporal correlates of information processing during visual short-term memory. Neuroreport 3(1):113–116
Vogels TP, Abbott LF (2009) Gating multiple signals through detailed balance of excitation and inhibition in spiking networks. Nat Neurosci 12(4):483–91
Vogt SM, Hofmann UG (2012) Neuromodulation of STDP through short-term changes in firing causality. Cogn Neurodyn 6(4):353–66
von der Malsburg C, Schneider W (1986) A neural cocktail-party processor. Biol Cybern 54(1):29–40
Wennekers T (2008) Tuned solutions in dynamic neural fields as building blocks for extended EEG models. Cogn Neurodyn 2(2):137–46
Whittington MA, Traub RD (2003) Interneuron diversity series: inhibitory interneurons and network oscillations in vitro. Trends Neurosci 26(12):676–82
Zaslavsky G (1978) The simplest case of a strange attractor. Phys Lett A 69(3):145–147
Zylberberg A, Fernández Slezak D, Roelfsema PR, Dehaene S, Sigman M (2010) The brain’s router: a cortical network model of serial processing in the primate brain. PLoS Comput Biol 6(4):e1000765
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the partial support by the Swiss National Science Foundation Grant No. CR13I1-138032. AJP’s work was supported, in part, by the Spanish MINECO FIS2015-66503-C3-2-P. All authors conceived and designed the simulations, which were performed primarily by DM. DM and AEPV wrote the paper, and all authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declares no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Malagarriga, D., Pons, A.J. & Villa, A.E.P. Complex temporal patterns processing by a neural mass model of a cortical column. Cogn Neurodyn 13, 379–392 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-019-09531-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11571-019-09531-2