Abstract
Genome-wide marker–trait associations (MTA) were established in a population of 358 European winter wheat cultivars and 14 spring wheat cultivars (Triticum aestivum L.) for resistance to Septoria tritici blotch caused by the fungal pathogen Mycosphaerella graminicola. The MTA were based on field data in two consecutive years and genotypic data on 732 microsatellite markers. Best linear unbiased estimations (BLUEs) for resistance were calculated across the trials and ranged from 0.67 (most resistant) to 19.63 (most susceptible) with an average value of 4.93. A total of 115 MTA relating to 68 molecular markers was discovered for the two trials and BLUEs by using a mixed linear model corrected by a kinship matrix. In addition, two candidate genes, Ppd-D1 for photoperiodism and the dwarfing gene Rht-D1, were significantly associated with resistance to Septoria tritici blotch. Several MTA co-located with known resistance genes, e.g. Stb1, 3, 4, 6 and 8, while multiple additional MTA were discovered on several chromosomes, such as 2A, 2D, 3A, 5B, 7A and 7D. The results provide proof of concept for the method of genome-wide association analysis and indicate the presence of further Stb resistance genes in the European winter wheat pool.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Septoria tritici blotch (STB) caused by Mycosphaerella graminicola (anamorph Septoria tritici) is one of the most important foliar diseases of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in Europe and in wheat-growing areas worldwide. Strobilurin fungicides or quinone outside inhibitors (QoIs) have been successfully used to control Septoria leaf blotch, but natural QoI-resistant variants caused by a point mutation in the cytochrome b allele of M. graminicola have evolved in field populations (Fraaije et al. 2005). The breeding of genetically resistant cultivars is therefore still a major task in controlling the disease.
During recent years a number of major Stb resistance genes have been mapped in various bi-parental mapping populations (for review see Goodwin 2007). The Stb6 resistance gene was associated with a significant reduction in STB in 226 wheat lines, while disease escape mechanisms, like plant height, leaf spacing, leaf morphology and heading date, have also played a role in avoidance of the disease (Arraiano et al. 2009). As well as the reports on mapping single Stb genes (Arraiano et al. 2001, 2007; Adhikari et al. 2004a, b, c; Brading et al. 2002; Chartrain et al. 2005a, b, 2009; McCartney et al. 2003; Ghaffary et al. 2012), several reports on mapping quantitative trait loci (QTL) for STB resistance in bi-parental mapping populations have emerged recently (Chartrain et al. 2004; Simón et al. 2004b; Risser et al. 2011; Kelm et al. 2012; Miedaner et al. 2012).
In this report we describe the application of a genome-wide association study (GWAS) for 358 recent European winter wheat varieties and 14 spring wheat cultivars in order to assess the genetic architecture of STB resistance in the spectrum of cultivars. While QTL mapping in bi-parental populations only represents the genetic repertoire of two accessions, GWAS is suitable for monitoring a broad spectrum of cultivars or accessions (Zhu et al. 2008). Additionally, more meiotic events that have taken place during evolution or cultivar development are taken into account compared to bi-parental populations, resulting in an increased genetic resolution and significance of the linkage disequilibrium (LD) of the species under investigation (Hamblin et al. 2011). There are a number of reports on GWAS in wheat for various traits including yield and agronomic traits (Neumann et al. 2011; Reif et al. 2011a; Wang et al. 2012), baking and milling quality (Breseghello and Sorrells 2006; Reif et al. 2011b; Bordes et al. 2011), ear emergence (Le Gouis et al. 2012), pre-harvest sprouting (Kulwal et al. 2012) and resistance to pathogens (Crossa et al. 2007; Maccaferri et al. 2010; Miedaner et al. 2011; Yu et al. 2011, 2013). Our set of cultivars was investigated in a parallel study on resistance to Fusarium head blight (Kollers et al. 2013).
The goal of the current study was (1) to assess a selection of 372 wheat cultivars for field resistance to STB in two environments, (2) to establish marker–trait associations for resistance to STB based on genome-wide coverage using 732 simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers plus markers for candidate genes, and (3) to compare the results obtained with the chromosomal locations of known Stb resistance genes and QTL, in order to test the hypothesis that association mapping is suitable for providing a comprehensive overview of the genetic architecture of STB resistance in recent European winter wheat cultivars and for detecting markers linked to resistance loci.
Materials and methods
Plant material, field trials and disease evaluation
A total of 358 European winter wheat cultivars and 14 spring wheat cultivars was evaluated in this study. Spring and winter wheat cultivars were sown at the same time. All varieties were grown in Cecilienkoog, Germany, in the years 2009 and 2010 using an incomplete alpha-block design with three replications per year. Each year was regarded as one environment.
The spray inoculation was performed with a spore suspension of 5 × 106 pycnidio spores/ml using a water application rate of 600 L/ha. The inoculation was performed twice at an interval of 10 days. The first inoculation was made at growth stage GS 39/41 (emerged flag leaf). To increase the risk of infestation, in plant stage GS 31/32 Septoria-infected grains were distributed on each plot at a density of 25 g/m2. Visual assessments of first leaves and flag leaves were performed 32 and 48 days after spray inoculation. The arithmetic means for three replications, two assessments and two kinds of leaves were calculated as the phenotypic resistance score to STB for each environment.
The cultivars were also evaluated for heading date and plant height in a companion study in eight locations over the same two seasons.
Molecular data analysis
The 372 cultivars were genotyped with 732 microsatellite markers using standard protocols on capillary sequencing machines. Of the microsatellite markers tested, 48 amplified more than one locus, resulting in 782 loci spread across the 21 chromosomes. Heterozygotes comprised 2.6 % of the data. With 4.8 % missing data points, 276,844 datapoints (95 %) were available for the association analysis.
Map positions on the ITMI mapping population (International Triticeae Mapping Initiative) were determined with the programme MAPMAKER v.3.0 using the Kosambi mapping function with a LOD score of 3.0 as the threshold for linkage. With this, 620 markers were placed on the ITMI map with 19 markers mapping to more than one position in the genome, resulting in a map of length 4,470 cM. This resulted in an average marker distance of 7.2 cM (ranging from 4.6 cM on chromosome 4B to 10.2 cM on chromosome 6A).
All the cultivars were additionally genotyped for candidate genes Rht-B1 and Rht-D1 (Ellis et al. 2002) and the Ppd-D1a allele of the photoperiod response locus Ppd-D1 (Beales et al. 2007). The candidate genes were not scored in the ITMI population and are therefore not included in the ITMI map. Their approximate location is found in Pestsova and Röder (2002) for gene Ppd-D1 on chromosome 2DS and in Börner et al. (1997) for genes Rht-B1 and Rht-D1 on chromosomes 4BS and 4DS.
Population structure was inferred with a principal coordinate analysis based on modified Rogers’ distance (Wright 1978) which was calculated with a subset of 155 loci. Principal coordinate analysis was performed in R software using the function cmdscale. The 155 markers were chosen to be distributed across the genome and based on reliability as having the lowest number of missing data points, no null alleles and lowest number of heterozygotes. A kinship matrix was calculated using the software SPAGeDi (Hardy and Vekemans 2002) based on the aforementioned 155 markers. Negative values were set to 0.
Results concerning population structure and linkage disequilibrium of this mapping population have been described earlier (Kollers et al. 2013).
Statistical analysis and association mapping
Best linear unbiased estimations (BLUEs) were calculated across the phenotypic data of both environments using the “Mixed models REML” module and the “Linear mixed models” of the software package GenStat 14th edition (VSN International Ltd, UK).
Marker–trait associations were calculated separately for each environment and the BLUEs. In GenStat the “QTL analysis” module and the “Single trait association analysis” function were utilized and the kinship matrix was chosen as the relationship model. For the calculation of genotype–phenotype associations, microsatellite data were converted into a bi-allelic data format resembling single nucleotide polymorphism data. A minor allele frequency threshold of 3 % (equalling 11 varieties) was set and alleles with a lower frequency were excluded from the analysis. After the filtering process, 3,176 alleles remained and were employed for the association mapping approach. MTA were considered as significant with −log10(P value) >3.0 and the Bonferroni correction resulted in a significance threshold of −log10(P value) >4.82.
Results
Description of phenotypic data
Resistance scores to Septoria tritici for 358 European winter wheat cultivars plus 14 spring wheat cultivars were based on field trials in 2 years. The resulting BLUEs ranged from 0.67 to 19.63 with an average value of 4.93 (Fig. 1). A total of eight cultivars had BLUEs ≤ 1.0; the two cultivars Julius and Solitär were the most resistant with BLUEs of 0.67 and 0.83, respectively (Supplemental file 1). The correlation coefficient of resistance scores between the two environments was moderate with R = 0.659, while the correlations with the BLUEs were higher with 0.859 and 0.943 for 2009 and 2010, respectively. The ANOVA indicated significant genotype as well as environmental effects (Supplemental file 2).
Marker–trait associations
Marker–trait associations (MTA) were calculated for each environment and the BLUEs based on the data of 782 microsatellite loci covering the whole genome by using a mixed linear model including the kinship matrix. Additionally, the genotyping data for the photoperiodism gene Ppd-D1 and the dwarfing genes Rht-D1 (formerly called Rht2) and Rht-B1 (formerly called Rht1) were tested for association with Septoria tritici resistance scores. In total, 115 association events with −log10(P value) >3.0 were detected for the microsatellite loci and the candidate genes (Table 1; Supplemental file 3); 44 MTA were based on the BLUEs. A decreasing mean additive effect (resulting in an increased resistance) was detected for 36 of the individual MTA, while an increasing additive effect (resulting in decreased resistance) was found for 79 MTA. The MTA detected related to 68 individual microsatellite loci, of which 48 loci were integrated into the ITMI map. For the BLUEs, 39 microsatellite loci were significant. Most microsatellite loci detected MTA in only one of the two environments including BLUEs (Supplemental file 4); however, multiple MTA were detected with some loci, such as five MTA with GWM391 on chromosome 3AL, four MTA for GWM1391 on chromosome 6DS and six MTA for marker BARC182 on chromosome arm 7BL (Fig. 2). In these cases more than one allele of the multi-allelic microsatellite markers was significant with sometimes contrasting positive or negative additive effects.
Marker GWM 369 was reported to be closely linked to resistance gene Stb6 (Brading et al. 2002). We had included this marker in our analysis, but of 22 alleles detected only three were above the MAF of 3 %. None of these alleles was significant; a significant effect was observed for allele GWM369_247 bp which was only present in one cultivar (Supplemental file 5).
In addition to the microsatellite loci, the Ppd-D1 marker was significant in both environments and the BLUEs. In all cases a positive additive effect was found for the Ppd-insensitive allele resulting in decreased resistance, while for the Ppd-sensitive allele a negative additive effect was found resulting in increased resistance (Supplemental file 3). Three MTA were significant for the dwarfing gene Rht-D1; here the mutant allele had a positive additive effect, while the wild type showed negative additive effect. These data are in agreement with negative Spearman rank correlations for plant height (−0.269) and heading date (−0.241) with the scores for BLUEs of Septoria resistance. This means taller and later flowering cultivars had less disease at the time scored.
Additive effects of favourable and unfavourable alleles
Each cultivar carries a combination of favourable and unfavourable alleles. The number of favourable alleles per cultivar (excluding the tested candidate genes) ranged from two to 18, with the highest number of observed events at six favourable alleles per cultivar (Fig. 3a). The number of unfavourable alleles per cultivar ranged from one to 30, with the highest number of observed events at seven (Fig. 3b). The two most resistant cultivars, Julius and Solitär, carried 13 and 14 favourable alleles, respectively, and each of them had two unfavourable alleles. The Spearman rank correlation between the number of favourable alleles per cultivar and its BLUEs for resistance to STB was −0.614, while the correlation of BLUES with the number of unfavourable alleles per cultivar was +0.56. This means cultivars with more favourable and fewer unfavourable alleles were more resistant.
Linear regression showed a dependence of BLUEs for resistance to STB on number of favourable alleles per cultivar with R 2 = 0.325 and Y = 9.45 − 0.583X (Fig. 4a), while the relationship between the number of unfavourable alleles per cultivar and BLUEs was Y = 2.03 + 0.271X with R 2 = 0.334 (Fig. 4b). These results indicated that, to a certain degree, the effects of favourable or unfavourable alleles are additive. Pyramiding of favourable alleles and avoidance of unfavourable alleles during the breeding process may therefore lead to more resistant cultivars.
Discussion
Our strategy and experimental setup allowed the detection of numerous marker–trait associations for resistance to Septoria tritici blotch. In total, 68 microsatellite loci detected significant marker–trait associations and indicated a quantitative pattern of inheritance for resistance to STB, though several major resistance genes have been described in the literature.
The Stb6 gene which originated from the cultivars Flame and Hereward was reported to be closely linked to marker GWM369 (Brading et al. 2002) and it was shown to be present in many cultivars and landraces worldwide (Chartrain et al. 2005b). We observed one MTA for marker WMC532 which neighbours GWM369. In addition, in the bi-parental mapping studies, Kelm et al. (2012) and Eriksen et al. (2003) reported a major QTL on chromosome arm 3AS where GWM369 is located.
Marker GWM1391 detected four MTA in our study. This marker is located on chromosome arm 6DS at a distance of 2.5 cM from GDM132 (Pestsova et al. 2000; Ganal and Röder 2007), which is reported to be linked with Stb3 (Adhikari et al. 2003). While the location of Stb3 on chromosome 6DS was questioned by Goodwin (2007), our data provide good evidence for the presence of a resistance factor to Septoria tritici on chromosome 6DS.
On chromosome 7D, three MTA were detected near locus GWM1587. Two resistance genes were reported in this chromosomal region: Stb5 originating from synthetic wheat (Arraiano et al. 2001; Simón et al. 2007) and Stb4 originating from cultivar Tadinia (Adhikari et al. 2004a). While Stb5 was mapped distal to marker GWM44 (Arraiano et al. 2001; Simón et al. 2007), Stb4 was located 0.7 cM distal to GWM111 (Adhikari et al. 2004a). In Ganal and Röder (2007), GWM1587 was located in a similar region distal to GWM111, but proximal to GWM44, and therefore the detected QTL may represent Stb4.
For the distal end of chromosome 7BL, marker BARC182 detected six MTA. In this chromosomal region Stb8 was mapped between markers GWM577 and GWM146 (Adhikari et al. 2003). In our map GWM577 is located ca. 12 cM proximal to BARC182; however, Stb8 could still be considered as a candidate gene for the observed MTA, since the distal chromosomal regions are usually rich in recombination events.
On chromosome 1B, marker WMC626 detected two MTA for Septoria resistance. Resistance gene Stb11 was linked to marker BARC008 on this chromosome (Chartrain et al. 2005c). BARC008 was located on the short arm of chromosome 1B, while WMC626 was mapped to the long arm of 1B though close to the centromere (Somers et al. 2004). The detected MTA is therefore most likely not identical to Stb11. Recently, resistance gene Stb2 was re-located on chromosome 1B; it mapped on the short arm in a similar region to Stb11 (Liu et al. 2013). On chromosome 1B, a QTL linked to WMC419 was also reported for the mapping population Florett × Biscay (Risser et al. 2011). WMC419 was located in the centromeric region of chromosome 1B in the interval between BARC008 and WMC626, and therefore the indicated QTL region may be identical to the MTA detected by WMC626.
On chromosome arm 5BL, three MTA were found for marker WMC537. In this region resistance gene Stb1 was mapped ca. 7.4 cM distal to markers GWM213 and GWM335 (Adhikari et al. 2004c). In our map, WMC537 was located at a distance of ca. 28 cM distal to GWM213 and GWM335, thus it can neither be excluded nor confirmed whether the MTA detected by WMC537 is based on Stb1. In this genomic region, Miedaner et al. (2012) also reported a meta-QTL for resistance to STB in the interval GWM371 to GWM274. Marker GWM371 maps close to GWM831 in the map of Ganal and Röder (2007), while GWM831 is 9.7 cM proximal to WMC537; it could therefore be the same QTL.
On chromosome arm 1AS, Kelm et al. (2012) reported a QTL for necrotic leaf area in the interval GWM1223 to GWM1097, which covers the genomic region of WMC336. Risser et al. (2011) also reported a QTL linked to WMC0024 for the population Tuareg × Biscay. WMC0024 is the next marker to GWM3094, which detected a MTA in our map.
Three linked markers on chromosome 3B, BARC164, GWM802 and GWM3144, detected MTA. This region coincides with a QTL linked to GWM131b in the Arina × Forno population (Miedaner et al. 2012). Another QTL in this population reported for the interval GWM274 to GWM371 on chromosome 5BL (Miedaner et al. 2012) coincides with three MTA discovered for marker BARC109. GWM 371 and BARC109 are both closely linked to GWM831 (Ganal and Röder 2007). The QTL of the History × Rubens population (Miedaner et al. 2012), flanked by markers GWM263 and GWM400 on chromosome 7B, appears to be located more distal than the MTA discovered by marker BARC267 on the same chromosome in our study. The MTA discovered for marker GWM1369 on chromosome 1B may coincide with the QTL linked to GWM752 in the Solitär × Mazurka population (Kelm et al. 2012). Both markers are located proximal to GWM11.
In several cases single markers detected MTA in at least three environments or BLUEs, such as WMC522 and GWM1115 on chromosome 2AS, GWM1419 on chromosome 2D, GWM391 on chromosome 3AL, BARC109 on chromosome 5B, WMC479 on chromosome 7AS and BARC267 on chromosome 7B. Major Stb genes have not yet been reported for any of these regions. The current results may therefore indicate the presence of further as-yet-undescribed Stb genes in the germplasm. Our results also provide additional information about novel markers linked to known Stb genes, such as GWM1391 for Stb3, GWM1587 for Stb4, and possibly BARC182 for Stb8 and WMC537 for Stb1.
A negative correlation of STB resistance with plant height indicated that taller cultivars tended to be more resistant. These results are in accordance with the observed MTA for the dwarfing gene Rht1-D1, with the wild-type allele increasing the resistance. Plant height was described, along with other traits concerning plant architecture such as leaf spacing and leaf prostrateness, as disease-escape mechanisms for STB (Arraiano et al. 2009), but also for other fungal diseases, such as Fusarium head blight (Miedaner and Voss 2008; Srinivasachary et al. 2008). Simón et al. (2004a) also reported a negative correlation between plant height and necrosis percentage for STB.
As well as plant height, a significant correlation was detected for heading date, with later flowering cultivars being more resistant, which was in accordance with the observations of Arraiano et al. (2009). A strong MTA was observed with the photoperiodism gene Ppd-D1 on chromosome 2DS, with the Ppd-sensitive allele increasing resistance. A significant QTL for resistance to STB as well as heading date in the respective region was described for the Balance × Apache population (Ghaffary et al. 2011), though the authors did not consider the possible influence of Ppd-D1 in their population. Simón et al. (2004a) reported a positive correlation between heading date and observed necrosis values, which is in contradiction to our results; however, the authors point out the strong influence of climatic conditions on the disease severity.
Our results provide an overview of the resistance spectrum for Septoria tritici blotch present in European winter wheat cultivars. Besides the known genes and QTL, several significant marker loci indicated the presence of as-yet-undetected resistance genes and QTL. Furthermore, the association mapping approach resulted in the identification of new markers for known as well as unknown Stb genes for marker-assisted selection during the breeding process. Additive effects of the numbers of favourable or unfavourable alleles per cultivar indicated that a breeding strategy of pyramiding favourable alleles and avoiding unfavourable alleles may increase field resistance to Septoria tritici blotch in a cultivar.
References
Adhikari TB, Anderson JM, Goodwin SB (2003) Identification and molecular mapping of a gene in wheat conferring resistance to Mycosphaerella graminicola. Phytopathology 93:1158–1164
Adhikari TB, Cavaletto JR, Dubcovsky J, Gieco JO, Schlatter AR, Goodwin SB (2004a) Molecular mapping of the Stb4 gene for resistance to Septoria tritici blotch in wheat. Phytopathology 94:1198–1206
Adhikari TB, Wallwork H, Goodwin SB (2004b) Microsatellite markers linked to the Stb2 and Stb3 genes for resistance to Septoria tritici blotch in wheat. Crop Sci 44:1403–1411
Adhikari TB, Yang X, Cavaletto JR, Hu X, Buechley G, Ohm HW, Shaner G, Goodwin SB (2004c) Molecular mapping of Stb1, a potentially durable gene for resistance to Septoria tritici blotch in wheat. Theor Appl Genet 109:944–953
Arraiano LS, Worland AJ, Ellerbrook C, Brown JKM (2001) Chromosomal location of a gene for resistance to Septoria tritici blotch (Mycosphaerella graminicola) in the hexaploid wheat ‘Synthetic 6x’. Theor Appl Genet 103:758–764
Arraiano LS, Chartrain L, Bossollini E, Slatter HN, Keller B, Brown JKM (2007) A gene in European wheat cultivars for resistance to an African isolate of Mycosphaerella graminicola. Plant Pathol 56:73–78
Arraiano LS, Balaam N, Fenwick PM, Chapman C, Feuerhelm D, Howell P, Smith SJ, Widdowson JP, Brown JKM (2009) Contributions of disease resistance and escape to the control of Septoria tritici blotch of wheat. Plant Pathol 58:910–922
Beales J, Turner A, Griffiths S, Snape J, Laurie DA (2007) A pseudo-response regulator is misexpressed in the photoperiod insensitive Ppd-D1a mutant of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet 115:721–733
Bordes J, Ravel C, Le Gouis J, Lapierre A, Charmet G, Balfourier F (2011) Use of a global wheat core collection for association analysis of flour and dough quality traits. J Cereal Sci 54:137–147
Börner A, Röder M, Korzun V (1997) Comparative molecular mapping of GA insensitive Rht loci on chromosomes 4B and 4D of common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genetics 95:1133–1137
Brading PA, Verstappen ECP, Kema GHJ, Brown JKM (2002) A gene-for-gene relationship between wheat and Mycosphaerella graminicola, the Septoria tritici blotch pathogen. Phytopathology 92:439–445
Breseghello F, Sorrells ME (2006) Association mapping of kernel size and milling quality in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars. Genetics 172:1165–1177
Chartrain L, Brading PA, Widdowson JP, Brown JKM (2004) Partial resistance to Septoria tritici blotch (Mycosphaerella graminicola) in wheat cultivars Arina and Riband. Phytopathology 94:497–504
Chartrain L, Joaquim P, Berry ST, Arraiano LS, Azanza F, Brown JKM (2005a) Genetics of resistance to Septoria tritici blotch in the Portuguese wheat breeding line TE 9111. Theor Appl Genet 110:1138–1144
Chartrain L, Brading PA, Brown JKM (2005b) Presence of the Stb6 gene for resistance to Septoria tritici blotch (Mycosphaerella graminicola) in cultivars used in wheat-breeding programmes worldwide. Plant Pathol 54:134–143
Chartrain L, Berry ST, Brown JKM (2005c) Resistance of wheat line Kavkaz-K4500 L.6.A.4 to Septoria tritici blotch controlled by isolate-specific resistance genes. Phytopathology 95:664–671
Chartrain L, Sourdille P, Bernard M, Brown JKM (2009) Identification and location of Stb9, a gene for resistanec to Septoria tritici blotch in wheat cultivars Courtot and Tonic. Plant Pathol 58:547–555
Crossa J, Burgueno J, Dreisigacker S, Vargas M, Herrera-Foessel SA, Lillemo M, Singh RP, Trethowan R, Warburton M, Franco J, Reynolds M, Crouch JH, Ortiz R (2007) Association analysis of historical bread wheat germplasm using additive covariance of relatives and population structure. Genetics 177:1889–1913
Ellis MH, Spielmeyer W, Gale KR, Rebetzke GJ, Richards RA (2002) “Perfect” markers for the Rht-B1b and Rht-D1b dwarfing genes in wheat. Theor Appl Genet 105:1038–1042
Eriksen L, Borum F, Jahoor A (2003) Inheritance and localisation of resistance to Mycosphaerella graminicola causing Septoria tritici blotch and plant height in the wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genome with DNA markers. Theor Appl Genet 107:515–527
Fraaije BA, Cools HJ, Fountaine J, Lovell DJ, Motteram J, West JS, Lucas JA (2005) Role of ascospores in further spread of QoI-resistant cytochrome b alleles (G143A) in field populations of Mycosphaerella graminicola. Phytopathology 95:933–941
Ganal MW, Röder MS (2007) Microsatellite and SNP markers in wheat breeding. In: Varshney RK, Tuberosa R (eds) Genomics assisted crop improvement: vol. 2: genomics applications in crops, pp 1–24
Ghaffary SMT, Robert O, Laurent V, Lonnet P, Margalé E, van der Lee TAJ, Visser RGF, Kema GHJ (2011) Genetic analysis of resistance to Septoria tritici blotch in the French winter wheat cultivars balance and apache. Theor Appl Genet 123:741–754
Ghaffary SMT, Faris JD, Friesen TL, Visser RGF, van der Lee TAJ, Robert O, Kema GHJ (2012) New broad-spectrum resistance to Septoria tritici blotch derived from synthetic hexaploid wheat. Theor Appl Genet 124:125–142
Goodwin SB (2007) Back to basics and beyond: increasing the level of resistance to Septoria tritici blotch in wheat. Austr Plant Pathol 36:532–538
Hamblin MT, Buckler ES, Jannink J-L (2011) Population genetics of genomics-based crop improvement methods. Trends Genet 27:98–106
Hardy OJ, Vekemans X (2002) SPAGEDi: a versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Mol Ecol Notes 2:618–620
Kelm C, Ghaffary SMT, Bruelheide H, Röder MS, Miersch S, Weber WE, Kema GHJ, Saal B (2012) The genetic architecture of seedling resistance to Septoria tritici blotch in the winter wheat doubled-haploid population Solitär × Mazurka. Mol Breed 29:813–830
Kollers S, Rodemann B, Ling J, Korzun V, Ebmeyer E, Argillier O, Hinze M, Plieske J, Kulosa D, Ganal MW, Röder MS (2013) Whole genome association mapping of Fusarium head blight resistance in European winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). PLoS ONE 8:e57500
Kulwal P, Ishikawa G, Benscher D, Feng Z, Yu L-X, Jadhav A, Mehetre S, Sorrells ME (2012) Association mapping for pre-harvest sprouting resistance in white winter wheat. Theor Appl Genet 125:793–805
Le Gouis J, Bordes J, Ravel C, Heumez E, Faure S, Praud S, Galic N, Remoué C, Balfourier F, Allard V, Rousset M (2012) Genome-wide association analysis to identify chromosomal regions determining components of earliness in wheat. Theor Appl Genet 124:597–611
Liu Y, Zhang L, Thompson IA, Goodwin SB, Ohm HW (2013) Molecular mapping re-locates the Stb2 gene for resistance to Septoria tritici blotch derived from cultivar Veranopolis on wheat chromosome 1BS. Euphytica 190:145–156
Maccaferri M, Sanguineti MC, Mantovani P, Demontis A, Massi A, Ammar K, KolmerJA CzemborJH, Czembor JH, Kolmer JA, Ezrati S, Tuberosa R (2010) Association mapping of leaf rust response in durum wheat. Mol Breed 26:189–228
McCartney CA, Brûlé-Babel AL, Lamari L, Somers DJ (2003) Chromosomal location of a race-specific resistance gene to Mycosphaerella graminicola in the spring wheat ST6. Theor Appl Genet 107:1181–1186
Miedaner T, Voss H-H (2008) Effect of dwarfing Rht genes on Fusarium head blight resistance in two sets of near-isogenic lines of wheat and check cultivars. Crop Sci 48:2115–2122
Miedaner T, Würschum T, Maurer HP, Korzun V, Ebmeyer E, Reif JC (2011) Association mapping for Fusarium head blight resistance in European soft winter wheat. Mol Breed 28:647–655
Miedaner T, Risser P, Paillard S, Schnurbusch T, Keller B, Hartl L, Holzapfel J, Korzun V, Ebmeyer E, Utz HF (2012) Broad-spectrum resistance loci for three quantitatively inherited diseases in two winter wheat populations. Mol Breed 29:731–742
Neumann K, Kobiljski B, Dencic S, Varshney RK, Börner A (2011) Genome-wide association mapping: a case study in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Mol Breed 27:37–58
Pestsova E, Röder MS (2002) Microsatellite analysis of wheat chromosome 2D allows the reconstruction of chromosomal inheritance in pedigrees of breeding programmes. Theor Appl Genet 106:84–91
Pestsova E, Ganal MW, Röder MS (2000) Isolation and mapping of microsatellite markers specific for the D genome of bread wheat. Genome 43:689–697
Reif JC, Maurer HP, Korzun V, Ebmeyer E, Miedaner T, Würschum T (2011a) Mapping QTLs with main and epistatic effects underlying grain yield and heading time in soft winter wheat. Theor Appl Genet 123:283–292
Reif JC, Gowda M, Maurer HP, Longin CFH, Korzun V, Ebmeyer E, Bothe R, Pietsch C, Würschum T (2011b) Association mapping for quality traits in soft winter wheat. Theor Appl Genet 122:961–970
Risser P, Ebmeyer E, Korzun V, Hartl L, Miedaner T (2011) Quantitative trait loci for adult-plant resistance to Mycosphaerella graminicola in two winter wheat populations. Phytopathology 101:1209–1216
Simón MR, Worland AJ, Struik PC (2004a) Influence of plant height and heading date on the expression of the resistance to Septoria tritici blotch in near isogenic lines of wheat. Crop Sci 44:2078–2085
Simón MR, Ayala FM, Cordo CA, Röder MS, Börner A (2004b) Molecular mapping of quantitative trait loci determining resistance to Septoria tritici blotch caused by Mycosphaerella graminicola in wheat. Euphytica 138:41–48
Simón MR, Ayala FM, Cordo CA, Röder MS, Börner A (2007) The use of wheat/goatgrass introgression lines for the detection of gene(s) determining resistance to Septoria tritici blotch (Mycosphaerella graminicola). Euphytica 154:249–254
Somers DJ, Issac P, Edwards K (2004) A high-density microsatellite consensus map for bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet 109:1105–1114
Srinivasachary, Gosman N, Steed A, Simmonds J, Leverington-Waite M, Wang Y, Snape J, Nicholson P (2008) Susceptibility to Fusarium head blight is associated with the Rht-D1b semi-dwarfing allele in wheat. Theor Appl Genet 116:1145–1153
Wang L, Ge H, Hao C, Dong Y, Zhang X (2012) Identifying loci influencing 1,000-kernel weight in wheat by microsatellite screening for evidence of selection during breeding. PLoS ONE 7:e29432
Wright S (1978) Evolution and genetics of populations, vol 4. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, p 91
Yu L-X, Lorenz A, Rutkoski J, Singh RP, Bhavani S, Huerto-Espino J, Sorrels ME (2011) Association mapping and gene–gene interaction for stem rust resistance in CIMMYT spring wheat germplasm. Theor Appl Genet 123:1257–1268
Yu L-X, Morgounov A, Wanyera R, Keser M, Singh SK, Sorrells M (2013) Identification of Ug99 stem rust resistance loci in winter wheat germplasm using genome-wide association analysis. Theor Appl Genet 125:749–758
Zhu C, Gore M, Buckler ES, Yu J (2008) Status and prospects of association mapping in plants. Plant Genome 1:5–20
Acknowledgments
This research was conducted within the framework of the project GABI-Wheat (Project No. 0315067) funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF). We thank A. Flieger, P. Joaquim and K. Wendehake for genotyping the varieties.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kollers, S., Rodemann, B., Ling, J. et al. Genetic architecture of resistance to Septoria tritici blotch (Mycosphaerella graminicola) in European winter wheat. Mol Breeding 32, 411–423 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-013-9880-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-013-9880-6