Abstract
This work reports one-step synthesis process of LiOH-castor oil based polyurethane foam (PU) by completely replacing synthetic polyol. The reaction involved reacting varying weight percentage of lithium hydroxide with castor oil along with isocyanate. The successfully synthesized stable PU foams were characterized for density, sol fraction, cellular morphology, polymer phase morphologies and thermo-mechanical properties. The properties of the LiOH-castor oil based PU foams were compared with the conventional PU foam. Flexibility of the synthesized foams was observed to be lower than conventional PU foam for 0.05%, 0.1% and 0.5% LiOH due to the presence of closed cells with pin holes. Whereas, presence of open cellular structure in 0.3% LiOH-castor oil based PU foams showed flexible nature. Sol fraction of all the synthesized foams was found low (~ 5%) indicating improved reactivity. Thermal conductivity, glass transition temperature, thermal stability and mechanical properties of the synthesized PU foams suggest the possibility of replacing conventional PU foams for various applications.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Polyurethanes (PU) foams are widely used polymers which find applications in upholstery, automotive seating, mattresses, and heat insulations etc.[1]. Other novel applications were addressed by enhancing the properties of PU foam [2,3,4] upon adding nanoparticles in the polymer matrix, such as in oil–water separation, electromagnetic shielding, medical cushioning, etc.[5,6,7]. Vegetable oils and their derivatives are being used as an alternative polyol in polyurethane foam synthesis since last 5 decades [1, 8, 9]. Although, vegetable oil derivatives, such as fatty acids, fatty acid esters, etc.can be obtained by transesterification or hydrolysis of vegetable oils, these modified oils have failed to replace the synthetic polyol completely in the polyurethane foam formulation. PU foam synthesis from renewable resources such as soybean oil, castor oil, palm oil, rapeseed oil, cardanol oil etc. [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25] suggests possibility of partial replacement of synthetic polyol. Among these vegetable oils, castor oil is the only naturally hydroxylated seed oil which makes it a feasible candidate for the complete replacement of synthetic polyol without further modification [26]. Synthetic polyol when completely replaced with castor oil in PU foam synthesis results in collapsed foam [18]. Various reasons have been attributed to the instability of foam; among them some major points are slow reaction between castor oil and isocyanate, low transient viscosity build-up during polymerization reaction, hard domain aggregation in the polymer phase, and slow modulus development of the reacting foaming blend [18]. Only few works has been reported in the literature addressing the issues mentioned above to overcome the causes of instability in the PU foam. Sharma et. al. initially investigated the foam stability upon gradual introduction of castor oil in the foaming blend. It shows that the complete replacement of synthetic polyol with castor oil resulted in collapsed foam [18]. Shaik et al. has reported the synthesis of stable PU foam using castor oil as a polyol and glycerol as crosslinking agent [27]. This work shows that the stability of the foam was restored by adding glycerol at varying concentration in the castor oil blend. Introduction of glycerol has found to increase the reactivity as it has high hydroxyl value. Foams synthesized were found rigid in nature with closed cells as observed in the cellular morphology. Sharma et. al. has reported the use of n-butlylithium for the modification of castor oil before being used as a bio based polyol in the synthesis of PU foam [28]. The study reports the successful synthesis of stable PU foam by reacting castor oil with n-butlylithium at sub-zero temperature resulting in splitting the ricinoleic acid into two fragments thereby increasing the hydroxyl index of the modified castor oil. This resulted in the faster and complete reaction of castor oil with isocyanate producing stable PU foam. Also, the Li+ ions produced during the reaction were found to disrupt the H-bonding between the urea-urea hard domains, thereby, overcoming the hard domain aggregation [29]. Hence, literature suggests that a probable solution to overcome instability of vegetable oil-based PU foams is to introduce Li+ ion in the foaming blend. The earlier work [28] involves multiple and complex steps of modification of castor oil with n-butyllithium which makes it difficult to process at large scale. Therefore, coming up with a simple process of synthesis can possibly make the technology feasible at commercial scale.
In this work, we report a successful one-step synthesis process of PU foam production using LiOH and castor oil blend for the generation of Li+ ion in the foaming blend. The foams were synthesized and were characterized for bulk density, sol fraction, cellular morphology, polymer phase morphology and thermo-mechanical properties and were compared with the conventional PU foam.
Materials and methods
Chemicals used
Isocyanate (polymeric 4,4 diphenyl methane diisocyanate, Suprasec 6456) was taken from Huntsman. Conventional polyol used (polypropylene glycol based, Konix FA 505, KPX Chemicals, S. Korea) was having approximate functionality, hydroxyl value and molecular weight of 3.0, 35 mg KOH/g polyol, and 4700 g/mol, respectively. Castor oil used (Molychem) had an approximate functionality of 2.7, hydroxyl value of 163 mg KOH/g oil and molecular weight of 930. Foam additives used was a blend of surfactant (Tegostab 87348734 LF, Evonik), catalysts which contains bis(2-dimethylaminoethyl) ether (Niax A1, Momentive), diethanolamine (Sigma-Aldrich) and a mixture of triethylenediamine, and dipropyleneglycol (Dabco 33LV, Air Products). Lithium hydroxide monohydrate used (Molychem) having a molecular weight of 41.95 and purity 99%. Distilled water was used as a chemical blowing agent.
Blending of lithium hydroxide and castor oil
Before starting the foaming process, castor oil was blended with lithium hydroxide. Castor oil blend contains 0.05%, 0.1%, 0.3% and 0.5% (w/w of Castor oil) of LiOH which were stirred using magnetic stirrer at 2000 rpm for 5 min. The resultant mixture was used as a polyol in the PU foam synthesis.
PU foam synthesis
The lithium hydroxide blend castor oil (93.3 parts by weight (pbw)), distilled water (4.2 pbw), catalyst blend (2.0 pbw) and surfactant (0.5 pbw) are poured into a paper/plastic cup of volume 300 mL. The blend was homogenized with a high speed mechanical stirrer at an approximate speed of 3000 rpm till it turns cream in colour. Further, isocyanate was added to the blend maintaining NCO index as 1 and stirred at high speed (3000 rpm) for around 20 s. The foam was then allowed to expand freely inside the paper cup acting as the mould and was then kept for curing at room temperature for 2 h.
Characterizations
Foam density was measured by taking foam of size 1 × 1 × 1 cm3 and there weights were measured using a high precision weighing machine. For each foam, five samples of mentioned dimension were taken from different areas of foam and their average was considered. The sol fraction in the polymeric phase was estimated by solvent extraction. Initially three samples were cut from each synthesized foams and their weight was measured. Further the dried samples were immersed in dimethyl formamide (DMF) for a period of 3 days. The samples were then kept in a vacuum oven at 80 ℃ for 24 h. Finally the sol fraction was calculated based on the ratio of difference in weight to that of the original weight. The cellular foam morphology was imaged by scanning electron microscope (ZEISS SEM). Samples of dimension 5 × 5 × 2 mm3 were cut and placed on sample holder. It is then placed into gold sputtering machine for about 30 min for coating the sample with gold. Further, the sample is placed into SEM and the micrographs were obtained. Finally, mean cell diameter (MCD), cell number density (CND), and mean strut thickness (MST) were calculated from scanning electron micrographs, using image analysis software (ImageJ). The thermal conductivity of the synthesized foam samples are carried out by a thermal properties analyser (KD2 Pro, Decagon Devices, Inc.). Foam samples of dimension 10 × 3 × 3 cm3 were cut and the probe of the instrument was inserted vertically into the samples. A differential scanning calorimeter (Q20, TA Instruments) was used to find the glass transition temperature. Approximately 2 mg of crushed PU foam sample was kept into an aluminum pan before inserting into the instrument. Samples were cooled from 80 °C to –60 °C at a rate of –5 °C/min. Thermogravimetric analysis of the foam samples were performed under inert atmosphere (by using nitrogen gas) using TGA instrument (SDT Q600, TA Instruments, USA). Approximately 3 mg of crushed PU foam samples were heated from room temperature to 800 °C at a rate of 10 °C/min. Final weight of the samples was noted upon completion for measuring the derivative weights of the foam samples. The tensile strength of the synthesized foam samples are carried out by a Universal Testing Machine (INSTRON 5960, dual column). Minimum of three foam samples of dimension specified under ASTM D3574 were cut and clamped in UTM. Further the loading is done at the rate of 10 mm/min till fracture point of foam is attained.
Results and discussion
Foam density, sol fraction and cellular morphology
Bulk density of PU foams may vary slightly according to the type of foam prepared. Rigid foams have a higher density than flexible foams as they have closed cells [30]. The density of the conventional PU foam is 0.032 ± 0.3 g/cc [31]. Fig. 1(a) shows the bulk density of foams prepared from castor oil. 0.05% and 0.1% LiOH based foams have high densities of around 0.13 g/cc and 0.18 g/cc respectively. Furthermore, the foams prepared from 0.3% and 0.5% LiOH have densities around 0.04 g/cc and 0.06 g/cc respectively. This implies that 0.3% LiOH based foams have bulk density comparable to that of conventional PU foams due to the presence of open cells as verified by the SEM image (Fig. 2(d)). On the other hand, due to closed cell structure in other samples (Fig. 2(b),(c),(e)), the bulk density is found relatively higher. The variation of bulk density can also occur due to the variation of cell number density (CND) of the foams [18]. Higher the CND more will be the bulk density of the foam. In order to find the percentage of loose molecules present after the reaction in the samples sol fraction was measured. It is well known in the literature that the reactivity of castor oil with isocyanate is very low, which contributes to the instability of PU foams [18]. Therefore, sol fraction is an important measurable parameter which indicates the extent of the reaction between the reactants. Sol fraction of conventional PU foam is around 1.4% [18]. Fig. 1(b) indicates the sol fraction of the synthesized PU foams. Sol fraction of foam with pure castor oil was found to be around 36% which is in agreement with the literature. However, sol fraction of LiOH based PU foams is found to have drastically reduced (around 5%) as shown in Fig. 1(b). This indicates the improved reactivity between castor oil and isocyanate in presence of LiOH.
Figure 2 shows the scanning electron micrographs of foam specimens. The scanning electron micrographs of 0.3% LiOH-castor oil based foams (Fig. 2(d)) show open cellular structure implying flexible nature of foam similar to the micrograph obtained for petro based PU foam (Fig. 2(a)). On the other hand, scanning electron micrographs of 0.05%, 0.1% and 0.5% LiOH-castor oil (shown in Fig. 2(b), 2(c), 2(e) respectively) based PU foams show closed cellular structure with presence of pin holes implying semi-rigid nature of foam [28].
Segmental polymer phase morphology
The stability of the foam also depends on the polymer phase morphology, which in turn decides the modulus development of the stretching polymer film while the foaming takes place [32]. The polyurethane consists of two phases namely urethane soft phase and poly-urea hard phase. Poly-urea (thermodynamically originated) disperses in the soft urethane matrix. A well dispersed hard phase causes uniform modulus development throughout the polyurethane film during cell growth, resulting in stable polyurethane foams [18, 33]. Hydrogen bonding in polyurethanes plays a significant role in determining the phase segregation [34, 35]. Aggregation of hard phase is the result of hydrogen bonding between the urea-urea phases, which causes uneven stretching film modulus resulting in rupture or failure of foam [36]. In order to evaluate the hydrogen bonding between urea-urea hard domains FTIR was performed on the foam samples. Figure 3 indicates that FTIR spectra of foams, where H-bonded urea peak appears around 1660 cm−1[18]. Pure castor oil based PU foam (0%) shows a prominent peak at 1660 cm−1 indicating the presence of hydrogen bonding between the hard domains, causing foams to collapse. On the other hand, introduction of Li+ molecules in the castor oil blend has significantly reduced the H-bonding between the hard domains as indicated by the disappeared peak at 1660 cm−1. This disruption of hydrogen bonding by Li+ ion is due to its smaller molar volume and stabilization energy of O–-Li+ complex [29, 37]. Thus, all the foams were found stable.
Thermogravimetric analysis
From the analysis of the TGA results of LiOH-castor oil based PU foams shown in Fig. 4, it is observed that there are three peaks in the mid abscissa range of the data curve. These illustrate three degradation zones. Each of the peaks corresponds to breakage of certain bond present in the polyurethane foam. The first peak refers to the breakage of C-H bonds in the range of 230 °C – 350 °C. At this temperature the foam starts to break up into smaller fragments from the original body. The second peak signifies the breakage of the C = O bond in the urea segment and the (N–H) linkages of the polymer matrix. This happens at a temperature range of 410 °C – 460 °C. The final peak represents the breakage of the C–C bonds in the polymer, which results in the total collapse of the polymer [38]. A significant result can be obtained from the thermogravimetric analysis is the derivative weight loss. It throws light on various temperature range where significant apparent weight is lost due to thermal degradation. A material is considered thermally stable as long as its weight does not change considerably with the increase in temperature. From Fig. 4 it is observed that the synthesized PU foams were found stable till 225 °C which is comparable with respect to the synthetic PU foam, where the 1st degradation occurs at ~ 217 °C [39], beyond which thermal disintegration begins.
Thermal and mechanical properties
PU foams find wide application as a thermally insulating material in various industries [40, 41]. Conventional flexible and rigid PU foams have thermal conductivity of ~ 0.026 W/mK and ~ 0.033 W/mK (approximately) respectively [42,43,44]. The thermal conductivities of the prepared foams were measured and tabulated in Table 1. The thermal conductivity of 0.3% LiOH-castor oil based foam is found to be 0.027 W/mK which is comparable to that of the conventional flexible PU foam. On the other hand, thermal conductivity of 0.05%, 0.1% and 0.5% lithium modified castor oil based foam is found to be 0.032, 0.037 and 0.030 W/mK respectively which is comparable to that of conventional rigid PU foam. Higher values of thermal conductivity were obtained for 0.05%, 0.1% and 0.5% LiOH based samples is due to the presence of closed cells. Variation of the thermal conductivity values among these samples can be correlated with the bulk density values. Wherein, a sample with higher bulk density is showing higher thermal conductivity. Thus, LiOH-castor oil based PU foams can be used as potential thermal insulating material for suitable applications.
Glass transition temperature (Tg) of the synthesized PU foams were extracted from the DSC curves shown in Fig. 5. The figure indicates the temperature below which the polymer chains become completely crystalline. Thus, for flexible PU foam it indicates the temperature below which the foams become stiff. It can be observed from the plots, that with increase in LiOH in the sample, the peaks observed continued to flatten, indicating that the degree of crystallization of the LiOH based PU foam to decrease. The sharp peaks indicate a higher degree of cross-linking between the polymer chains [45]. As the Tg of all the synthesized samples are well below 0 °C. These foams can be suitably used under different ambience with varying temperatures. A variation in Tg values of 0.05%, 0.1% and 0.5% with respect to 0.3% LiOH based samples can be attributed to the type of the foam produced (i.e. rigid and flexible). The rigid foams have a Tg values ~ 22 °C, whereas flexible foam is having a value of 14 °C.
Table 2 showing tensile modulus, tensile strength at break and percentage elongation at break of all LiOH-castor oil PU foam samples were determined using the tensile stress (MPa) versus strain (%) curve (shown in Fig. 6). Percentage elongation of 0.3% lithium modified castor oil foam is found to be 57% which is lower than that of conventional PU foam having a value of 79% [18]. This reduction in percentage elongation is because of low molecular weight of castor oil as compared to that of synthetic polyol [46]. On the other hand, tensile strength for 0.3% LiOH-castor oil PU foam is found to be 0.31 MPa which is much higher than that of conventional PU foam having a value of 0.048 MPa [18]. Thus, the mechanical properties of 0.3% LiOH-castor oil based PU foam can be compared to conventional flexible PU foam which is a probable alternative against conventional PU foams.
On the other hand, tensile strength of 0.5% Li modified castor oil is found to be 0.15 MPa which is much lower than that of conventional rigid PU foam. The tensile stress of 0.05% and 0.1% LiOH-castor oil based foams are 1.04 MPa and 0.89 MPa respectively is comparably higher with respect to the conventional rigid foam (0.4255 MPa). Thus it can be concluded that 0.05%, 0.1% and 0.5% LiOH-castor oil foam has much lower tensile strength than that of conventional rigid PU foam.
Conclusion
Stable polyurethane foam was successfully synthesized via one-step process using LiOH-castor oil blend by completely replacing synthetic polyol. The synthesized PU foams were characterized for density, sol fraction, cellular morphology, polymer phase morphologies and thermo-mechanical properties. Sol fraction of the foams indicates improved reactivity. Density of the foams was relatively higher as compared to conventional flexible polyurethane foam. Cellular morphology suggests presence of closed cells with pin holes for 0.05%, 0.1% and 0.5% LiOH-castor oil based PU foams and open cellular structure for 0.3% LiOH-castor oil based PU foams. Thermal conductivities of the foams were approximately same as compared to both flexible and rigid conventional PU foams. Glass transition temperature of all the foams were found below – 10 °C. Thermogravimetric analysis shows foams were stable till 225 °C. The tensile strength of LiOH-castor oil based PU foam was found to be much higher than the conventional foams (tensile strength of 0.3% Li based PU foam is 0.31 MPa). Therefore, one step synthesis process of the LiOH-castor oil based PU foams suggests the possibility of replacing synthetic polyols in the synthesis process of PU foams at commercial scale.
References
Pfister DP, Xia Y, Larock RC (2011) Recent advances in vegetable oil-based polyurethanes. Chemsuschem 4(6):703–717
Kim KT, Dao TD, Jeong HM, Raghu AV, Aminabhavi TM (2015) Graphene coated with alumina and its utilization as a thermal conductivity enhancer for alumina sphere/thermoplastic polyurethane composite. Mater Chem Phys 153:291–300
Nguyen DA, Raghu AV, Choi JT, Jeong HM (2010) Properties of thermoplastic polyurethane/functionalised graphene sheet nanocomposites prepared by the in situ polymerisation method. Polym Polym Compos 18(7):351–358
Raghu AV, Lee YR, Jeong HM, Shin CM (2008) Preparation and physical properties of waterborne polyurethane/functionalized graphene sheet nanocomposites. Macromol Chem Phys 209(24):2487–2493
Gupta RK, Dunderdale GJ, England MW, Hozumi A (2017) Oil/water separation techniques: a review of recent progresses and future directions. Journal of Materials Chemistry A 5(31):16025–16058
Ghosh S, Ganguly S, Remanan S, Mondal S, Jana S, Maji PK, Singha N, Das NC (2018) Ultra-light weight, water durable and flexible highly electrical conductive polyurethane foam for superior electromagnetic interference shielding materials. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 29(12):10177–10189
Vinay VC, Varma DSM, Chandan MR, Sivabalan P, Jaiswal AK, Swetha S, Kaczmarek B, Sionkowska A (2021) Study of silver nanoparticle-loaded auxetic polyurethane foams for medical cushioning applications. Polym Bulletin 1–18
Singh I, Samal SK, Mohanty S, Nayak SK (2020) Recent Advancement in Plant Oil Derived Polyol-Based Polyurethane Foam for Future Perspective: A Review. Eur J Lipid Sci Technol 122(3):1900225
Petrović ZS (2008) Polyurethanes from vegetable oils. Polym Rev 48(1):109–155
Veronese VB, Menger RK, Forte MMDC, Petzhold CL (2011) Rigid polyurethane foam based on modified vegetable oil. J Appl Polym Sci 120(1):530–537
Tan S, Abraham T, Ference D, Macosko CW (2011) Rigid polyurethane foams from a soybean oil-based polyol. Polymer 52(13):2840–2846
Yang LT, Zhao CS, Dai CL, Fu LY, Lin SQ (2012) Thermal and mechanical properties of polyurethane rigid foam based on epoxidized soybean oil. J Polym Environ 20(1):230–236
Zhang K, Hong Y, Wang N, Wang Y (2018) Flame retardant polyurethane foam prepared from compatible blends of soybean oil-based polyol and phosphorus containing polyol. J Appl Polym Sci 135(5):45779
Gu R, Konar S, Sain M (2012) Preparation and characterization of sustainable polyurethane foams from soybean oils. J Am Oil Chem Soc 89(11):2103–2111
Stirna U, Lazdiņa B, Vilsone D, Lopez MJ, Vargas-Garcia MDC, Suárez-Estrella F, Moreno J (2012) Structure and properties of the polyurethane and polyurethane foam synthesized from castor oil polyols. J Cell Plast 48(6):476–488
Zhang C, Kessler MR (2015) Bio-based polyurethane foam made from compatible blends of vegetable-oil-based polyol and petroleum-based polyol. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 3(4):743–749
Carriço CS, Fraga T, Pasa VM (2016) Production and characterization of polyurethane foams from a simple mixture of castor oil, crude glycerol and untreated lignin as bio-based polyols. Eur Polymer J 85:53–61
Sharma C, Kumar S, Unni AR., Aswal VK. Rath SK, Harikrishnan G (2014) Foam stability and polymer phase morphology of flexible polyurethane foams synthesized from castor oil. J Appl Polym Sci 131(17)
Marcovich NE, Kurańska M, Prociak A, Malewska E, Kulpa K (2017) Open cell semi-rigid polyurethane foams synthesized using palm oil-based bio-polyol. Ind Crops Prod 102:88–96
Pillai PK, Li S, Bouzidi L, Narine SS (2016) Metathesized palm oil polyol for the preparation of improved bio-based rigid and flexible polyurethane foams. Ind Crops Prod 83:568–576
Jaratrotkamjorn R, Tanrattanakul V (2020) Bio‐based flexible polyurethane foam synthesized from palm oil and natural rubber. J Appl Polym Sci 49310
Zhang D, Chen S (2020) The study of palm-oil-based bio-polyol on the morphological, acoustic and mechanical properties of flexible polyurethane foams. Polym Int 69(3):257–264
Zieleniewska M, Leszczyński MK, Kurańska M, Prociak A, Szczepkowski L, Krzyżowska M, Ryszkowska J (2015) Preparation and characterisation of rigid polyurethane foams using a rapeseed oil-based polyol. Ind Crops Prod 74:887–897
Mosiewicki MA, Rojek P, Michałowski S, Aranguren MI, Prociak A (2015) Rapeseed oil‐based polyurethane foams modified with glycerol and cellulose micro/nanocrystals. J Appl Polym Sci 132(10)
Suresh KI (2013) Rigid polyurethane foams from cardanol: synthesis, structural characterization, and evaluation of polyol and foam properties. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering 1(2):232–242
Ogunniyi DS (2006) Castor oil: a vital industrial raw material. Biores Technol 97(9):1086–1091
Hussain Shaik A, Jain R, Manchikanti S, Krishnamoorthy K, Kumar Bal D, Rahaman A, Rehaan Chandan M (2020) Reinstating Structural Stability of Castor Oil based Flexible Polyurethane Foam using Glycerol. ChemistrySelect 5(13):3959–3964
Sharma C, Edatholath SS, Raman Unni A, Umasankar Patro T, Aswal VK, Rath SK, Harikrishnan G (2016) A pre‐polyaddition mediation of castor oil for polyurethane formation. J Appl Polym Sci 133(38)
Aneja A, Wilkes GL, Yurtsever E, Yilgor I (2003) Influence of lithium chloride on the morphology of flexible slabstock polyurethane foams and their plaque counterparts. Polymer 44(3):757–768
Lee ST, Park CB, Ramesh NS (2007) Polymeric foams: science and technology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
Imran M, Rahaman A, Shaik AH, Chandan MR (2020) Stability enhancement of highly loaded nano-clay-based flexible polyurethane foams using hollow glass microspheres. J Cell Plast 56:547–557
Chandan MR, Naskar N, Das A, Mukherjee R, Harikrishnan G (2018) Deducing multiple interfacial dynamics during polymeric foaming. Langmuir 34(27):8024–8030
Wu L, Ryan AJ, Meier IK (2002) Morphology development via reaction-induced phase separation in flexible polyurethane foam. Macromolecules 35(13):5034–5042
Raghu AV, Jeong HM, Kim JH et al (2008) Synthesis and characterization of novel polyurethanes based on 4-{(4-hydroxyphenyl)iminomethyl}phenol. Macromol Res 16:194–199
Raghu AV, Jeong HM (2008) Synthesis, characterization of novel dihydrazide containing polyurethanes based on N1, N2-bis [(4-hydroxyphenyl) methylene] ethanedihydrazide and various diisocyanates. J Appl Polym Sci 107(5):3401–3407
Kaushiva BD, Wilkes GL (2000) Alteration of polyurea hard domain morphology by diethanol amine (DEOA) in molded flexible polyurethane foams. Polymer 41(18):6981–6986
Sheth JP, Aneja A, Wilkes GL (2004) Exploring long-range connectivity of the hard segment phase in model tri-segment oligomeric polyurethanes via lithium chloride. Polymer 45(17):5979–5984
Garrido MA, Font R (2015) Pyrolysis and combustion study of flexible polyurethane foam. J Anal Appl Pyrol 113:202–215
Bryśkiewicz A, Zieleniewska M, Przyjemska K, Chojnacki P, Ryszkowska J (2016) Modification of flexible polyurethane foams by the addition of natural origin fillers. Polym Degrad Stab 132:32–40
Sarier N, Onder E (2008) Thermal insulation capability of PEG-containing polyurethane foams. Thermochim Acta 475(1–2):15–21
Demharter A (1998) Polyurethane rigid foam, a proven thermal insulating material for applications between+ 130 C and− 196 C. Cryogenics 38(1):113–117
Han MS, Choi SJ, Kim JM, Kim YH, Kim WN, Lee HS, Sung JY (2009) Effects of silicone surfactant on the cell size and thermal conductivity of rigid polyurethane foams by environmentally friendly blowing agents. Macromol Res 17(1):44–50
Estravís S, Mediavilla JT, Calvo MS, Herrero JLR, Villafañe F, Pérez MAR (2016) Rigid polyurethane foams with infused nanoclays: relationship between cellular structure and thermal conductivity. Eur Polymer J 80:1–15
Kraemer RH, Zammarano M, Linteris GT, Gedde UW, Gilman JW (2010) Heat release and structural collapse of flexible polyurethane foam. Polym Degrad Stab 95(6):1115–1122
Wang L, Shen Y, Lai X, Li Z, Liu M (2011) Synthesis and properties of crosslinked waterborne polyurethane. J Polym Res 18(3):469–476
Lederman JM (1971) The prediction of the tensile properties of flexible foams. J Appl Polym Sci 15(3):693–703
Acknowledgements
Authors acknowledge Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore for providing the research facilities. We would also like to thank Huntsman Polyurethanes India Ltd. for generously providing foam chemicals.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shaik, A.H., Banerjee, S., Rahaman, A. et al. One-step synthesis and characteristics of LiOH-castor oil based stable polyurethane foam. J Polym Res 28, 220 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-021-02580-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-021-02580-4