Abstract
Tumor-derived exosomes have documented roles in accelerating the initiation and outgrowth of metastases, as well as in therapy resistance. Little information supports the converse, that exosomes or similar vesicles can suppress metastasis. We investigated the NME1 (Nm23-H1) metastasis suppressor as a candidate for metastasis suppression by extracellular vesicles. Exosomes derived from two cancer cell lines (MDA-MB-231T and MDA-MB-435), when transfected with the NME1 (Nm23-H1) metastasis suppressor, secreted exosomes with NME1 as the predominant constituent. These exosomes entered recipient tumor cells, altered their endocytic patterns in agreement with NME1 function, and suppressed in vitro tumor cell motility and migration compared to exosomes from control transfectants. Proteomic analysis of exosomes revealed multiple differentially expressed proteins that could exert biological functions. Therefore, we also prepared and investigated liposomes, empty or containing partially purified rNME1. rNME1 containing liposomes recapitulated the effects of exosomes from NME1 transfectants in vitro. In an experimental lung metastasis assay the median lung metastases per histologic section was 158 using control liposomes and 15 in the rNME1 liposome group, 90.5% lower than the control liposome group (P = 0.016). The data expand the exosome/liposome field to include metastasis suppressive functions and describe a new translational approach to prevent metastasis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Tumor metastasis, the process by which tumor cells leave a primary tumor to successfully colonize a distant organ, is a major contributor to cancer patients’ deaths, either by direct organ compromise or side effects of its treatment [1]. Despite decades of mechanistic research, a diagnosis of metastatic cancer is usually a terminal illness. A known contributor to the metastatic process is tumor-derived exosomes, membrane-enclosed vesicles of 30–150 nm diameter, containing proteins, RNAs and other components [2,3,4,5]. In vivo, exosomes promote the development of a pre-metastatic niche, regulate tumor cell interactions with the microenvironment, promote angiogenesis, guide target organ colonization, and determine metastatic site specificity [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]. Exosomes also promote other clinically relevant aspects of cancer aggressiveness such as chemoresistance and immune responses [14, 15].
In contrast, only sporadic reports have investigated a potential metastasis suppressive effect of exosomes or other membranous vesicles. In vitro experiments demonstrated inhibition of tumor migration by exosomal miRNAs [16, 17]. Mesenchymal stem cells overexpressing miR-128 produced miR-128 containing exosomes that inhibited urothelial carcinoma proliferation and invasion in vitro, and inhibited tumorigenesis and metastasis in vivo [18]. Synthetic folic acid modified exosomes containing hyaluronidase reduced murine 4T1 mammary carcinoma migration in vitro and lung metastasis in vivo [19]. If more thoroughly understood, the existence of metastasis suppressive extracellular vesicles could represent a potential new translational advance. Many issues remain in this nascent literature including the role of other protein and miRNA cargoes in the exosomes, mechanisms of action on target tumor and/or microenvironmental cells, optimal delivery doses and schedules, etc. In addition to miRNAs, the metastasis suppressor proteins stand as notable candidates for participation in such processes.
We have asked if the NME1 metastasis suppressor confers motility, migration and metastasis suppressive activity through extracellular vesicles. Metastasis suppressors are genes, RNAs and/or proteins that, when re-expressed at physiological levels in metastatic tumor cells, significantly reduce metastasis without affecting primary tumor size. As such, they provide a window into metastasis-specific signaling. NME1 was identified by its reduced expression in K1735 murine metastatic melanoma sublines as compared to related nonmetastatic sublines [20], and reduced NME1 expression has been associated with aggressive clinical disease (rev. in [21]). Re-expression of NMEs in model systems of breast, hepatocellular, non-small cell lung cancers, melanoma established its metastasis suppressor activity [22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]. Opposing these solid tumor findings, NME expression in leukemias correlated with advanced disease [31]. NME is a family of genes with the human -H1 and -H2 best studied; in Drosophila, the NME homolog awd regulates differentiation from imaginal discs and other organs late in development [32, 33]. A unifying functional role for NME/AWD proteins in cellular endocytosis has been established, whereby the signaling of growth factor receptors is modified. In Drosophila development, aberrant endocytosis was noted in follicle cells, the trachea, and the nervous system in awd null mutants resulting in the deregulation of multiple signaling pathways [34,35,36]. In both Drosophila development and human tumor cell motility and metastasis, an interaction of NME and dynamin has been causal [34, 37, 38]. NME-mediated suppression of tumor cell migration and metastasis has been linked to its interaction with, and promotion of Dynamin 2 (DNM2) oligomerization and function. This interaction facilitated the endocytosis of receptors and other proteins, altering their availability for motility signaling and/or downstream signaling patterns, which in turn affect motility, migration, and metastasis. A dynamin-based mechanism of action has also been reported for the Drosophila homolog of NME, AWD, in regulating development and differentiation [34]. NME has been found extracellularly [39], although its packaging and functional consequences in solid tumors are poorly understood (rev. in [40, 41]).
Herein, we defined several parameters of NME in exosomal or liposomal vesicles, asking: (1) Is NME protein secreted into exosomes and does its abundance mirror intracellular levels? (2) Are NME containing exosomes or liposomes taken up by tumor cells and what phenotypes do they confer? (3) For tumor cell secreted exosomes, what other protein cargoes accompany NME? (4) Is NME an active motility, migration and metastasis inhibitory component in extracellular vesicles?
Materials and methods
Cell culture conditions and transfection
Human triple-negative breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231T (generously provided by Dr. Zach Howard, NCI, Bethesda, MD) and MDA-MB-435 were grown in DMEM (Invitrogen) supplemented with 10% FBS in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator maintained at 37 °C. MDA-MB-231T cells have been authenticated by our laboratory to the ATCC MDA-MB-231 line by short tandem repeat profiling. MDA-MB-435 cells have been attributed to either melanoma or breast carcinoma [42, 43]. MDA-MB-231T (C-Flag) and MDA-MB-435 cells overexpressing NME1 were generated using lentivirus system as described previously [38]. NME1 overexpression profiles of each stable cell line was confirmed by Western blot analysis. Additional methods for cell culture is provided in Supplementary file.
Boyden chamber motility assay
Motility assays were performed as described previously [38, 44]. Briefly, following trypsinization and counting of cells, equal numbers of cells were plated into each upper well of Boyden chamber (0.1 million/ml; 56 µl) in DMEM. Upper and lower chambers were separated by a coated membrane (Polyvinyl membrane 8 µm, coated overnight with 5 μg/ml of collagen type I and washed in PBS for 30’). Cells in the upper wells were allowed to migrate towards chemoattractants placed in the lower wells (1% FBS or conditioned medium, either neat or fractionated- 30 μl, per well) for 4 h in a humidified chamber maintained at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Non-migrated cells were wiped off and cells that had migrated to the undersurface of the membrane were fixed and stained with Diff-Quik solutions (Dade-Behring). All the stained and migrated cells were examined microscopically. Representative areas of each well were counted to determine the number of cells that had migrated. Mean (± SEM) number of cells migrated are plotted in the graph.
Exosome purification, characterization, and analyses
Exosomes were purified by sequential centrifugation as described previously [6, 11]. Cells were grown in exo-stripped serum containing DMEM for 4 days. Conditioned medium was collected and centrifuged at 500 × g for 10 min to remove any cell contamination and 3000 × g for 20 min at 4 °C to remove any cell debris. Conditioned media was spun at 12,000 g for 20 min at 10 °C to remove any possible apoptotic bodies and large cell debris. Finally, exosomes were collected as a pellet by spinning at 100,000 g for 70 min at 10 °C while its supernatant was used as cytokine fraction. Exosomes were washed in 20 ml PBS and pelleted again by ultracentrifugation (100,000 × g, 70 min, 10 °C) using Type 70 Ti rotor (Beckman Coulter). Exosome size and particle number were analyzed using the LM10 Nanoparticle Tracking Analysis (NanoSight, Malvern Panalytical). For protein quantification, exosome pellets were resuspended in PBS and lysed with 10 × RIPA buffer (Cell Signaling Technology). Protein quantification of the lysed exosomes was performed using the Micro BCA Protein Assay Kit (#23235, ThermoFisher Scientific).
Liposome preparation
Liposomes were prepared using Liposome Kit (L4395, Sigma-Aldrich) containing powdered lipids (Total 90 µmoles/package; Cholesterol, 9 μmol/package, L-α-Phosphatidylcholine (egg yolk), 63 μmol/package, Stearylamine, 18 μmol/package). Powdered lipid was sequentially dissolved in 32 ml PBS, with or without 1000 μg of rNME1, and was incubated for 30 min with rotation at room temperature. The liposomes were put through three freeze–thaw cycles (− 196 °C for 4 min, 42 °C for 4 min) and then extruded 20 cycles through a 100 nm single clean track-etched polycarbonate membrane of NanoSizer MINI STERILE Extruder (TT-002S-010, T&T Scientific). Extruded liposomes were centrifuged (28,000 rpm, 30 min, 4 °C) for separating bound (pellet) and unbound (supernatant) rNME1. Efficiency of rNME1 encapsulation by the liposomes was assessed by Western blot, showing NME1 level at each step of liposome-rNME1 preparation.
Size distribution and zeta potential analysis
Control liposomes and liposomes containing rNME1 were assessed for particle size distributions and zeta potential using ZetaView (Particle Metrix). All samples were diluted in PBS to a final volume of 1 ml and measurement concentrations were found to be 200–300 particles/frame. For every measurement, three cycles were performed by scanning 11 cell positions each at the mobility of 4.38 ± 0.09 µm/sec/V/cm (25 °C). After capture, the videos were analyzed by the ZetaView software.
Experimental metastasis assays
All the animal experiments were performed at NCI-Frederick with an approved National Cancer Institute animal use agreement. Six-week-old Balb/c athymic nude female mice were injected with 7.5 × 105 MDA-MB-231T cells into their lateral tail vein. Exosomes/liposomes were injected three times on 1st, 4th and 7th week post cell inoculation (days 7, 28 and 49). For exosomes, 20 µg exosomes derived from either vector or NME1 overexpressing stable cells in PBS were used per injection along with PBS control. For liposomes, 0.2 mg lipid containing 5 µg rNME1 protein in PBS per injection were used along with control liposomes. Mice were sacrificed 58 days postinjection (for exosomes and 51 days postinjection for liposomes) and the lungs were fixed in Bouin's solution followed by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining. Lung metastatic lesions were counted, and area was measured on H&E step sections using Aperio ImageScope and were reported as a median for each group.
Statistical analyses
All experiments were repeated at least three times unless specified. Statistical significance was calculated by a one-way ANOVA (*, P < 0.05; **, P < 0.01; ***, P < 0.001; ****, P < 0.0001). For metastasis Two tailed t-test (nonparametric) was performed comparing median across any two groups, with P < 0.05 considered significant (*). ns, nonsignificant.
Results
Extracellular vesicle (EV) fractions from NME1 overexpressing tumor cell lines preferentially inhibit tumor cell motility and migration in vitro
We hypothesized that exosomes from high NME1 expressing tumor cell lines would contain greater NME and be potent inhibitors of tumor cell motility and migration. Two metastatic tumor cell lines were used, MDA-MB-231T and MDA-MB-435, either the naïve cell lines or previously published sets of vector- and NME1 transfectants [38]. Conditioned medium (CM) from each transfectant was used as an attractant for naïve MDA-MB-231T or MDA-MB-435 tumor cell lines in Boyden chamber motility assays. Naïve MDA-MB-231T breast cancer cells, when exposed to the CM of NME1 transfectants, migrated 67% and 53% less than with their respective control transfectant-derived CMs, respectively (CM of MDA-MB-231T p = 0.0008; CM of MDA-MB-435 p < 0.0001) (Fig. 1A); similar trends were observed when naïve MDA-MB-435 tumor cells were exposed to the two sets of CM from NME1 and vector transfectants, with migration to CM from NME1 transfectant 48.9% and 43.9% less than that of their respective control transfectant-derived CMs, respectively (both p < 0.0001) (Fig. 1D). When the CMs were separated into cytokine and extracellular vesicle (EV) fractions by ultracentrifugation [45], the motility inhibitory activity of the NME1 transfectant-derived CM resided in the EV fraction (Fig. 1B, C, E, F).
We then asked whether treatment of naïve tumor cells with EV fractions of CM from vector or NME1 transfected cell lines would alter their 2D-migration and motility responses to other attractants. Naïve MDA-MB-231T cells treated directly with the EV fraction from NME1 transfected tumor cell lines migrated less in scratch assays compared to cells exposed to EV from the vector control. The percent of scratch area closed by Vector EV vs NME1 EV was 51.8% vs 24.5% at 12 h, and 78.2% vs 46.3% at 24 h for EVs derived from MDA-MB-231. Similarly, the percent of scratch area closed by vector vs NME1 EV was 46.9% vs 15.9% at 12 h, and 66.7% vs 37.7% at 24 h for EVs derived from MDA-MB-435 cells (Fig. 1G-I). Similar inhibitory results were observed using naïve MDA-MB-435 cells when directly treated with EV fraction of NME1 transfectants compared to its control at both 12 and 24 h (Supplementary Fig. S1A-C). Additionally, each tumor cell line was preincubated for 48 h in the EV fraction of CM, which was then washed off, and tumor cell motility was determined to the combination of growth factors in fetal bovine serum (FBS) using Boyden chamber assays (Supplementary Fig. S1D, E). In each case, naïve tumor cells pretreated with exosomes from NME1 transfected cell lines moved significantly less to FBS compared to those cultured with exosomes from vector transfectants (p < 0.0001 for all experiments). The data indicate a broad in vitro tumor motility inhibitory activity of EV fractions of CM from high NME1 expressing tumor cell lines.
Several types of EVs have been described [4, 5, 46]. Nanoparticle tracking analysis of the EV fraction from two sets of NME1 and control transfectants demonstrated characteristics consistent with exosomes with a median size of 121–128 nm from MDA-MB-231T tumor cells and 99 nm from MDA-MB-435 tumor cells (Fig. 2A-B). NME1 overexpressing cell lines produced more exosomes/ml CM than vector controls, a 12.1% increase for MDA-MB-231T tumor cells and a 12.6% increase for MDA-MB-435 tumor cells. Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) confirmed a typical exosome structure and varying size of approximately 50–150 nm (Supplementary Fig. S2A, B).
Exosomes from high NME1-expressing tumor cell lines contain greater NME1
We determined NME1 levels in cellular and exosomal lysates from two sets of control and NME1 transfectants. NME1 levels were elevated in exosomes from the NME1 transfectants (Fig. 2C-D). As a control for exosome isolation, exosome lysates were enriched in TSG101, a component of the endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT) [47], Alix, an ESCRT-associated protein involved in exosome budding [4], Rab 27A, involved in exosome release [4], and Flotillin 1, which modulates exosome biogenesis and cargo [48].
A similar analysis of cellular and exosome lysates of multiple breast cell lines is shown on Fig. 2E-F. The immortal breast cell line MCF-10A exhibited high cellular NME1 levels but virtually no exosome expression of either NME1, RAB27A or ALIX. Six tumorigenic, low-nonmetastatic breast cancer lines exhibited relatively high cellular NME1 levels, with five of the six having exosomes containing NME1; ALIX and RAB27A levels tended to covary with NME1 in exosomes. Cellular NME1 levels of three metastatic breast cancer cell lines were lower than that of nonmetastatic lines, but NME1 was appreciably lower in their exosomes and covaried with ALIX. RAB27A was low in two metastatic cell lines and moderate in the remaining two metastatic cell lines. The lack of NME1 in exosomes from an immortal breast cell line suggests that exosome sorting mechanisms may vary between normal and tumor cells, if the findings replicate in additional cell lines. NME1 incorporation into exosomes was near universal in tumor cell lines and showed a general concordance with cellular levels.
The NME1 content of exosomes from tumor cell lines appeared to rely on both cellular NME1 expression level and the presence of exosome generating machinery (Fig. 2E-F). We then asked if the combination of high tumor NME1 and high exosome biogenesis activity had prognostic significance in breast cancer (Fig. 2G and Supplementary Fig. S3A-B). Using the TCGA breast cancer database progression free survival (PFS) was plotted by primary tumor median expression of NME1 and/or Rab27A expression, the latter a marker of exocytotic pathways [49] (Fig. 2G, Supplementary Fig. S3A-B). High expression of both NME1 and Rab27A resulted in the best PFS and, conversely, low expression of both genes resulted in the poorest PFS, with mixed gene expression combinations in between. Rab27A itself was prognostic while NME1 expression showed a trend.
Exosomes enter recipient tumor cell lines and alter NME1 expression
If NME1-containing exosomes were to affect metastasis-associated functions, they must fuse with tumor cells and deploy their contents at sufficient levels. Exosomes from the CM of two sets of control- and NME1 transfectants were labelled using the ExoGlow-membrane EV labelling kit. Labelled exosomes were added to target cell cultures (15% v/v) and their cellular uptake was visualized using fluorescent microscopy 24 h post-treatment. Red fluorescently labelled exosomes derived from vector or NME1 overexpressing MDA-MB-435 or MDA-MB-231 stable cells were observed in naïve MDA-MB-23T and MDA-MB-435 cancer cells (Fig. 3A-B and Supplementary Fig. S4 A-B). There was no observable difference in red fluorescence between cells treated with exosomes from vector or NME1 transfectants, suggesting no difference in uptake efficiency. Naïve cancer cells treated with exosomes derived from NME1 overexpressing MDA-MB-435 or MDA-MB-231T cells showed an increase in NME1 expression on western blots compared to vector exosome treated cells (Fig. 3C-D). These data argue that exosomal NME is taken up by tumor cells and results in discernable increases in cellular levels.
Analysis of the exosome proteome
Exosomes are known to contain thousands of proteins and nucleic acids [46]. We asked if NME1 was the only differentially expressed protein in exosomes from control- and NME1 transfected tumor cell lines. A mass spectroscopy analysis of vector and NME1 transfected MDA-MB-435 tumor cell exosomes identified over 600 proteins (Supplementary Table S1 and S2) of which 392 were differentially expressed by ≥ 1.5-fold (Fig. 4A-B). The most abundant exosomal protein identified was NME1 (red arrow). Its degree of overexpression could not be quantified as it was not detected in the vector transfectant exosomes. Exosome-associated proteins were identified and provide support for the specificity of the input (Supplementary Fig. S5A-B). Included among the differentially expressed proteins were additional metastasis-associated proteins including RAC1, RHOA and TSP1. In agreement, an IPA pathway analysis of the differentially expressed exosomal proteins identified metastasis-associated pathways including integrin signaling, epithelial adherens junction, actin cytoskeleton, RhoGDI, paxillin, RHO and RAC signaling that could, in themselves, influence metastasis (Fig. 4C). Endocytic pathways, known to be a target of NME1 action, were also identified by IPA pathway analysis including clatherin-mediated endocytosis signaling, virus entry via endocytic pathways, and caveolar-mediated endocytosis signaling (Fig. 4C).
NME-containing exosomes show only a trend in reducing metastatic outgrowth
We hypothesized that exosomes from NME1 overexpressing cell lines would be metastasis suppressive. Exosomes from vector and NME1 overexpressing MDA-MB-435 tumor cells were collected and stored at − 80 °C. Figure 5A demonstrates that the exosomes from the NME1 transfected line contained greater NME1 protein than those from the corresponding vector transfectant. An experimental metastasis assay was performed in which MDA-MB-231T tumor cells were injected into the tail veins of nude mice on day 0. Reasoning that exosomes may not produce a permanent change in phenotype, three exosome injections were spread out over the 9-week experiment (20 µg protein in PBS/injection, or PBS) (Fig. 5B). Representative formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded (FFPE) sections of lungs at the experimental endpoint showed multiple metastases that declined in the NME1 exosome treated arm (Fig. 5C). PBS treated mice developed a median of 23.5 metastases per lung section. Injection of exosomes from the vector transfectant resulted in 80 metastases per section, an augmentation of metastasis consistent with prior literature [5, 46]. Injection of exosomes from the NME1 overexpressing cell line resulted in a median of 31 metastases per section, a 61.25% reduction from the vector control, although only a statistical trend (p = 0.10) (Fig. 5D). Analysis of metastasis size revealed similar trends. The median size of metastases from mice treated with PBS, exosomes from vector transfectant and NME1 transfectant were 4,185,752 µm2, 13,865,596.5 µm2 and 7,527,619 µm2, respectively (p = 0.24) (Fig. 5E).
Liposomes containing rNME1 recapitulate tumor motility and migration suppressor functions
The lack of significant metastasis inhibition by exosomes from NME1 overexpressing tumor cells, despite robust motility and migration inhibition, may have several causes: (1) Other components of the exosomes may exert pro-metastatic influences, (2) sufficient NME may not have been delivered in vivo, or (3) extracellular vesicular NME may be motility but not metastasis regulatory. To answer at least some of these questions we turned to a larger vesicle capable of delivering increased cargo loads of a single protein. Liposomes are one of several nanomaterial platforms to deliver drugs or proteins, and offer the potential advantages of higher capacity, biocompatibility, and easy loading [50].
A liposomal vector was developed to deliver NME1 in vitro and in vivo. A cholesterol, L-α-phosphatidylcholine and stearylamine based liposome was used as a protein carrier and loaded with partially purified recombinant bacterial NME1 (rNME1) (Supplementary Figs. S6A and S6B). Loading efficiency was estimated at > 90% by western blot as compared to total protein input (Supplementary Fig. S6C). The control- and NME1 loaded liposomes were cationic in nature and had comparable diameters (220.9 and 198.6 nm) as measured by Zeta View NTA (Fig. 6A, B) and Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) (Fig. 6C, D).
To assess the delivery of rNME1 to target cells using liposomes, naïve MDA-MB-231T or MDA-MB-435 cells were treated with either control liposomes or liposomes containing a labelled rNME1 and its delivery was confirmed by western blot (Fig. 6E, F).In Boyden chamber motility assays, the control liposome preparation was 25% and 22% motility inhibitory to the MDA-MB-231T and MDA-MB-435 tumor cell lines, respectively. This compares to 76% and 72% motility inhibition of the same lines by rNME1 containing liposomes (both p < 0.0001) (Fig. 6 G–H). The migration of naïve MDA-MB-231T and MDA-MB-435 tumor cells after incubation with rNME1 containing liposomes was reduced by 22% and 29%, respectively (both p < 0.0001) (Fig. 6I-J and Supplementary Fig. S6D-E). The data indicate that a rNME1 liposomal preparation recapitulated motility and migration suppressive phenotypes of tumor cell derived exosome containing NME1.
Liposomes containing rNME1 are metastasis suppressive
In an initial toxicity dose response analysis using liposomes loaded with rNME1 protein, a dose of 0.2 mg lipid containing 5 µg rNME1/mouse was found to be safe (Supplementary Fig. S7A and B). A similar experimental metastasis design was used for liposome injections as was used for exosomes (Fig. 7A). MDA-MB-231T breast cancer cells were injected into the tail veins of nude mice, and liposome injections spread out over the 7-week experiment (1st, 4th and 7th week). Representative photographs of lung sections from the two groups are shown on Fig. 7B. Median lung metastases per histologic section was 158 using control liposomes and 15 in the rNME1 liposome group, 90.5% lower than the control liposome group (P = 0.016) (Fig. 7C). A similar reduction in metastasis size was observed, from a median of 4.49 x 107 µm2 using control liposomes to 3.63 x 106 µm2 in the rNME1 group (P = 0.020) (Fig. 7D).
Lung sections from all three groups were stained by immunohistochemistry and presented with H&E and rabbit IgG isotype control (Fig. 7E). NME1 protein was cytoplasmic in nests of tumor cells and was darker in intensity in those animals treated with rNME1-containing liposomes, confirming uptake in vivo. Increased NME1 expression was also observed in uninvolved lung, suggesting that liposomes also fused with normal cells (Fig. 7E). No specific staining was observed with rabbit IgG isotype control.
Liposomal and exosomal NME modulates the endocytic process
Since the endocytic process has been found to be integral to NME phenotypes in both tumor metastasis and Drosophila development, we asked if exosomal or liposomal NME1 delivery followed the same pathway. We previously reported that NME1 overexpressing breast cancer cell lines showed increased endocytosis of transferrin receptor and EGF receptor (EGFR) due to a NME1-Dynamin2 interaction regulating endocytic vesicle scission leading to motility and metastasis suppression [38]. In vitro, naïve MDA-MB-231T and MDA-MB-435 tumor cell lines demonstrated increased endocytosis of EGFR when incubated with exosomes derived from NME1 overexpressing cells (Fig. 8A–B and Supplementary Fig. S8A-B) or liposomes containing rNME1 (Fig. 8C–D and Supplementary Fig. S8C-D), confirming that exosomal NME1 initiates known intracellular mechanisms of action.
To determine if EGFR trafficking and activity was altered in vivo, lung sections from the liposome experiment were stained by immunohistochemistry for total and phospho-EGFR (Fig. 8E and Supplementary Fig. S9A-B). Total EGFR was both cytoplasmic and membranous in tumor cell nests, and of variable intensity in the experimental arms. For mice treated with rNME1-containing liposomes, lung sections expressed less EGFR staining with a heterogenous staining pattern. To examine EGFR activation, an antibody to pEGFR (1068 + 1092) demonstrated prominent staining in lung sections from the control liposome arm but markedly lower staining in the lung sections from animals treated with rNME1-containing liposomes, consistent with previous data that NME1-increased endocytosis resulted in EGFR inactivation. No specific staining was observed with rabbit IgG isotype control (Supplementary Fig. S9A).
Discussion
Our data support a role for NME1 protein in extracellular vesicles in the regulation of tumor cell motility, migration and metastasis, a finding that is potentially translatable. We show that many breast cancer cell lines secrete exosomes containing NME1 in rough proportion to their intracellular levels, as opposed to a single nontumorigenic breast cell line. Exosomes from two NME1-transfected cell lines, or synthetic liposomes loaded with partially purified rNME1, released their contents into naïve tumor cells, altering EGFR endocytic functions, and inhibiting tumor cell motility and migration in vitro. Only liposomes, containing greater NME and devoid of other cell-derived proteins found in exosomes, inhibited experimental metastasis at levels comparable to NME1 transfection.
The metastasis suppressors stand as optimal candidates for vesicle-based therapeutic approaches. The metastasis suppressor KAI1 has also been shown to be exported into exosomes in colorectal cancer [51]. An extracellular role for the NME family of proteins (NME1-8) has been previously proposed in stem cells, leukemias and solid tumors, but issues exist, including whether findings are due to soluble or vesicular protein, the receptor if a soluble protein, the participation of other proteins if an exosome, and phenotypic consequences. NME proteins lack a signal peptide for secretion. For leukemias NME proteins are found in the bloodstream, have prognostic ability [31], and recombinant NME proteins stimulated tumor proliferation [52]; a receptor has not been identified. In solid cancer models soluble NME has been detected [53, 54] as well as NME in extracellular vesicles [55, 56]. Data presented herein confirm the incorporation of NME1 into exosomes in breast cancer cell lines, and identify their functional consequences in vitro on naïve tumor cells.
Exosomes from a high NME1 expressing cell line showed only a trend in reduced metastasis numbers and size in vivo. Additional testing of other doses and schedules was limited by the exorbitant tissue culture requirements for exosome collection. NME1 encapsulated in liposomes significantly reduced experimental metastasis to levels lower than either the PBS or control liposome injected arms, with a corresponding diminution in lesion size. The data suggest the hypothesis that liposomal or similar delivery of NME protein may have a metastasis preventive effect. To date, no signs of toxicity have been observed. To our surprise empty liposomes increased experimental metastasis. It is possible that the lipid composition of liposomes is critical to baseline effects on metastasis, as lipids in a variety of forms cause increased metastasis [57,58,59]. Many other variables will be tested in future experiments including liposome structure, dose and schedule of inoculation, and a metastasis shrinking versus preventive effect. NME may be particularly suitable for this type of delivery as it is a very long-lived protein. Liposomes have been widely tested preclinically to deliver drugs and biologicals and several clinical trials are being conducted [60] (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?cond=cancer&term=liposome+or+liposomal&cntry=&state=&city=&dist=).
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article [and its supplementary information files].
References
Steeg PS (2016) Targeting metastasis. Nat Rev Cancer 16(4):201–218
Dvorak HF et al (1981) Tumor shedding and coagulation. Science 212(4497):923–924
Crawford N (1971) The presence of contractile proteins in platelet microparticles isolated from human and animal platelet-free plasma. Br J Haematol 21(1):53–69
Mashouri L et al (2019) Exosomes: composition, biogenesis, and mechanisms in cancer metastasis and drug resistance. Mol Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12943-019-0991-5
Zhang L (1871) Yu DH (2019) Exosomes in cancer development, metastasis, and immunity. Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta-Rev Cancer 2:455–468
Peinado H et al (2012) Melanoma exosomes educate bone marrow progenitor cells toward a pro-metastatic phenotype through MET. Nat Med 18(6):883–891
Rodrigues G et al (2019) Tumour exosomal CEMIP protein promotes cancer cell colonization in brain metastasis. Nat Cell Biol 21(11):1403–1412
Costa-Silva B et al (2015) Pancreatic cancer exosomes initiate pre-metastatic niche formation in the liver. Nat Cell Biol 17(6):816–826
Ono M et al (2014) Exosomes from bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells contain a microRNA that promotes dormancy in metastatic breast cancer cells. Sci Signal. https://doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.2005231
Zhang HY et al (2017) Exosome-delivered EGFR regulates liver microenvironment to promote gastric cancer liver metastasis. Nat Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15016
Hoshino A et al (2015) Tumour exosome integrins determine organotropic metastasis. Nature 527(7578):329–335
Ichikawa H et al (2021) Exosome transfer between pancreatic-cancer cells is associated with metastasis in a nude-mouse model. Anticancer Res 41(6):2829–2834
Wang D et al (2020) Exosome-encapsulated miRNAs contribute to CXCL12/CXCR4-induced liver metastasis of colorectal cancer by enhancing M2 polarization of macrophages. Cancer Lett 474:36–52
Wang KY et al (2020) An exosome-like programmable-bioactivating paclitaxel prodrug nanoplatform for enhanced breast cancer metastasis inhibition. Biomaterial. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120224
Corrado C et al (2013) Exosomes as intercellular signaling organelles involved in health and disease: basic science and clinical applications. Int J Mol Sci 14(3):5338–5366
Shimbo K et al (2014) Exosome-formed synthetic microRNA-143 is transferred to osteosarcoma cells and inhibits their migration. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 445(2):381–387
Mao G, Mu Z, Wu D (2021) Exosome-derived miR-2682–5p suppresses cell viability and migration by HDAC1-silence-mediated upregulation of ADH1A in non-small cell lung cancer. Hum Exp Toxicol 40(12 suppl):S318–S330. https://doi.org/10.1177/09603271211041997
Shang D, Liu Y, Chen Z (2022) Exosome-transmitted miR-128 targets CCL18 to inhibit the proliferation and metastasis of urothelial carcinoma. Frontiers Mol Biosci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2021.760748
Feng CX et al (2021) Folic acid-modified Exosome-PH20 enhances the efficiency of therapy via modulation of the tumor microenvironment and directly inhibits tumor cell metastasis. Bioactive Mater 6(4):963–974
Steeg PS et al (1988) Evidence for a novel gene associated with low tumor metastatic potential. J Nat’l Cancer Inst 80:200–204
Hartsough MT, Steeg PS (2000) Nm23/nucleoside diphosphate kinase in human cancers. J Bioenerg Biomembr 32(3):301–308
Leone A et al (1991) Reduced tumor incidence, metastatic potential, and cytokine responsiveness of nm23-transfected melanoma cells. Cell 65:25–35
Leone A et al (1993) Transfection of human nm23-H1 into the human MDA-MB-435 breast carcinoma cell line: Effects on tumor metastatic potential, colonization, and enzymatic activity. Oncogene 8:2325–2333
Parhar RS et al (1995) Effects of cytokine mediated modulation of Nm23 expression on the invasion and metastatic behavior of B16F10 melanoma cells. Int J Cancer 60:204–210
Miyazaki H et al (1999) Overexpression of nm23-H2/NDP Kinase B in a human oral squamous cell carcinoma cell line results in reduced metastasis, differentiated phenotype in the metastatic site, and growth factor-independent proliferative activity in culture. ClinCancer Res 5:4301–4307
Liu F et al (2002) Transfection of the nm23-H1 gene into human hepatocarcinoma cell line inhibits the expression of sialyl Lewis X, a1,3 fucosyltransferase VII, and metastatic potential. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 128:189–196
Che G et al (2006) Transfection of nm23-H1 increased expression of beta-Catenin, E-cadherin and TIMP-1 and decreased the expression of MMP-2, CD44v6 and VEGF and inhibited the metastatic potential of human non-small cell lung cancer cell line L9981. Neoplasma 53(6):530–537
Lim J et al (2011) Cell-permeable NM23 Blocks the maintenance and progression of established pulmonary metastasis. Can Res 71(23):7216–7225
Fan Y et al (2013) nm23-H1 gene driven by hTERT promoter induces inhibition of invasive phenotype and metastasis of lung cancer xenograft in mice. Thoracic Cancer 4(1):41–52
Jarrett SG et al (2013) NM23 deficiency promotes metastasis in a UV radiation-induced mouse model of human melanoma. Clin Exp Metas 30(1):25–36
Yokoyama A et al (1998) Evaluation by multivariate analysis of the differentiation inhibitory factor nm23 as a prognostic factor in acute myelogenous leukemia and application to other hematologic malignancies. Blood 91(6):1845–1851
Dearolf C, Hersperger E, Shearn A (1988) Developmental consequences of awdb3, a cell autonomous lethal mutation of Drosophila induced by hybrid dysgenesis. Dev Biol 129:159–168
Woolworth JA, Nallamothu G, Hsu T (2009) The drosophila metastasis suppressor gene Nm23 homolog, awd, regulates epithelial integrity during oogenesis. Mol Cell Biol 29(17):4679–4690
Dammai V et al (2003) Drosophila awd, the homolog of human nm23, regulates FGF receptor levels and functions synergistically with shi/dynamin during tracheal development. Genes Dev 17(22):2812–2824
Ignesti M et al (2014) Notch signaling during development requires the function of awd, the Drosophila homolog of human metastasis suppressor gene Nm23. BMC Biol. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7007-12-12
Nallamothu G et al (2008) awd, the homolog of metastasis suppressor gene Nm23, regulates Drosophila epithelial cell invasion. Mol Cell Biol 28(6):1964–1973
Boissan M et al (2014) Nucleoside diphosphate kinases fuel dynamin superfamily proteins with GTP for membrane remodeling. Science 344(6191):1510–1515
Khan I, Gril B, Steeg PS (2019) Metastasis suppressors NME1 and NME2 promote dynamin 2 oligomerization and regulate tumor cell endocytosis, motility, and metastasis. Can Res 79(18):4689–4702
Romani P et al (2016) Dynamin controls extracellular level of Awd/Nme1 metastasis suppressor protein. Naunyn-Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol 389(11):1171–1182
Romani P et al (2018) Extracellular NME proteins: a player or a bystander? Lab Invest 98(2):248–257
Bunce CM, Khanim FL (2018) The “known-knowns”, and “known-unknowns” of extracellular Nm23-H1/NDPK proteins. Lab Invest 98(5):602–608
Ross DT et al (2000) Systematic variation in gene expression patterns in human cancer cell lines. Nat Genet 24(3):227–235
Chambers AF (2009) MDA-MB-435 and M14 cell lines: identical but not M14 melanoma? Cancer Res 69(13):5292–5293
Horak CE et al (2007) Nm23-H1 suppresses tumor cell motility by down-regulating the lysophosphatidic acid receptor EDG2. Cancer Res 67(15):7238–7246
Chevallet M et al (2007) Toward a better analysis of secreted proteins: the example of the myeloid cells secretome. Proteomics 7(11):1757–1770
Wortzel I et al (2019) Exosome-mediated metastasis: communication from a distance. Dev Cell 49(3):347–360
Babst M et al (2000) Mammalian tumor susceptibility gene 101 (TSG101) and the yeast homologue, Vps23p, both function in late endosomal trafficking. Traffic 1(3):248–258
Okabayashi S, Kimura N (2010) LGI3 interacts with flotillin-1 to mediate APP trafficking and exosome formation. NeuroReport 21(9):606–610
Ostrowski M et al (2010) Rab27a and Rab27b control different steps of the exosome secretion pathway. Nat Cell Biol 12(1):19–30
Yang BY et al (2021) Recent advances in liposome formulations for breast cancer therapeutics. Cell Mol Life Sci 78(13):5225–5243
Jung YR et al (2016) Silencing of ST6Gal I enhances colorectal cancer metastasis by down-regulating KAI1 via exosome-mediated exportation and thereby rescues integrin signaling. Carcinogenesis 37(11):1089–1097
Okabe-Kado J et al (2009) Extracellular NM23 protein promotes the growth and survival of primary cultured human acute myelogenous leukemia cells. Cancer Sci 100(10):1885–1894
Anzinger J, et al (2001) Secretion of a nucleoside diphosphate kinase (Nm23-H2) by cells from human breast, colon, pancreas and lung tumors. 44th Annual Meeting of the Western-Pharmacology-Society, Vancouver, Canada Mar 25–29 Proceedings of the Western Pharmacology Society. Vol.44, pp 61–3
Yokdang N et al (2011) A role for nucleotides in support of breast cancer angiogenesis: heterologous receptor signalling. Br J Cancer 104(10):1628–1640
Palazzolo G et al (2012) Proteomic analysis of exosome-like vesicles derived from breast cancer cells. Anticancer Res 32(3):847–860
Kruger S et al (2014) Molecular characterization of exosome-like vesicles from breast cancer cells. BMC Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-44
Menard JA et al (2016) Metastasis stimulation by hypoxia and acidosis-induced extracellular lipid uptake is mediated by proteoglycan-dependent endocytosis. Cancer Res 76(16):4828–4840
Li YJ et al (2020) Hepatic lipids promote liver metastasis. Jci Insight. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci.insight.136215
Luo XJ et al (2018) The implications of signaling lipids in cancer metastasis. Exp Mol Med. https://doi.org/10.1038/s12276-018-0150-x
Park JW (2002) Liposome-based drug delivery in breast cancer treatment. Breast Cancer Res 4(3):93–97
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the NCI confocal and FACS facilities. Electron Microscopy was performed at the NICHD Microscopy & Imaging Core with the assistance of Chip Dye. P. Steeg is supported by the Intramural Program of the NCI, NIH [Investigator-Initiated Intramural Research Projects (ZIA). Project #1ZIASC000892-33, Application #9344091]. This work is supported by an NIH intramural grant.
Funding
This work is supported by a National Institutes of Health (NIH) intramural grant.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conception and design: IK, PSS; Development of methodology: IK, PSS; Acquisition of data (provided animals, provided facilities, etc.): IK, BG, AH, SD, DCL; Analysis and interpretation of data (e.g., statistical analysis, biostatistics, computational analysis): IK, HHY, MPL, BG, DCL, PSS; Writing, review, and/or revision of the manuscript: IK, PSS, DCL; Administrative, technical, or material support (i.e., reporting or organizing data, constructing databases): IK; Study supervision: IK, DCL, PSS.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Conflicts of interest
No potential conflicts of interest were disclosed.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Khan, I., Gril, B., Hoshino, A. et al. Metastasis suppressor NME1 in exosomes or liposomes conveys motility and migration inhibition in breast cancer model systems. Clin Exp Metastasis 39, 815–831 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-022-10182-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10585-022-10182-7