Introduction

Pterygium is a common benign growth of the conjunctiva on the sclera, which impairs vision. Its pathogenesis is linked to environmental factors such as frequent exposure to ultraviolet light in hot, dry, windy and dusty areas and smoky environments (Koranyi et al. 2004). The tumor suppressor gene p53 has been implicated in the pathogenesis of pterygium, as well as several other genes involved in DNA repair, cell proliferation and migration, and angiogenesis, indicating the interaction of genetic and environmental factors (Liu et al. 2013).

Pterygium is commonly treated by surgical excision, and recurrence is the most common complication following surgery. There are different surgical options: bare sclera, conjunctival and limbal autografts, mitomycin C, lamellar keratoplasty and amniotic membrane (AM) transplantation (Hirst 2003). AM is the innermost layer lining the foetal sac in the uterus. It is widely used as a wound healing material in many disciplines, including ophthalmology. AM is processed using different protocols: fresh, lyophilized, and cryopreserved at −80 °C (Alireza et al. 2007). The preservation method may affect its biological and functional properties when transplanted on the eye surface. Cryopreservation of AM significantly impairs viability and proliferative capacity of its cells; hence, AM does not trigger immune reactions in the transplanted eye (Kruse et al. 2000). AM serves as a biological scaffold containing epidermal growth factor (EGF), transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) and other biomolecules that promote host cell proliferation and wound healing (Koizumi et al. 2000; Alió et al. 2005). The content AM comprising of collagen IV, collagen VII, laminin, laminin 5, and fibronectin, and soluble proteins TIMP-1 and IL-1ra has been reported to be not significantly changed after preservation for 24 months at −80 °C (Thomasen et al. 2011). On the other hand, other studies reported that levels of EGF (Gicque et al. 2009) and TGF-β (Hopkinson et al. 2006), which are important in wound healing, are reduced by cryopreservation. The latter report gives credence to the assumption that cryopreserved AM functions as a structural scaffold that enhances corneal epithelia proliferation rather than as a biochemical wound healing material (Kruse et al. 2000).

Pterygium excision is frequently associated with recurrence. In bare sclera excision, the recurrence rate is as high as 38.09 % (Alpay et al. 2009) and may reach 89 % (Khan et al. 2010). However, recurrence can be reduced considerably by using limbal or conjunctival autografts (Li et al. 2012; Kocamis and Bilgec 2014). Lamellar keratoplasty and AM with or without topical application of anti-metabolities such as mitomycin C have been used. Mitomycin C has also been used alone (Salman and Dina 2011), but its use on bare sclera is controversial due to its rare but potentially serious side effects (Norliza et al. 2006; Kheirkhah et al. 2012). Some studies indicated that conjunctival and limbal autografts are associated with similar (Kangkeng et al. 2012) or lower rates of pterygium recurrence than AM (Kaufman et al. 2013), and lower than that of bare sclera (Besharati et al. 2008). Others reported that AM grafts were associated with less frequent recurrence than conjunctival autografts and advocated the use of AM (Ma et al. 2000). We therefore investigated the rate of pterygium recurrence and post-surgery complications and its relation to cryopreservation duration of AM.

Materials and methods

Placenta procurement

Procurement and processing of placenta and AM tissue were ethically approved by the Libyan National Committee for Biosafety and Bioethics, and informed consent was obtained from each donor. Placentas were collected between August 2012 and October 2013 from six healthy mothers during elective cesarean deliveries at the Gynaecology Department of the Tripoli Medical Centre, Tripoli. The donors were screened for HBV, HCV and HIV by using chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) (Abbot ARCHITECT® 1000sr, USA). Donors were assessed for compatibility with tissue safety criteria; they were questioned in detail about their medical and behavioral history as listed in the donation form before signing the consent form.

Amniotic membrane preparation

Placentas were transported to the laboratory in a sterile, 2-l, wide-mouth glass bottle containing 1 l sterile saline solution supplemented with antibiotics (50 mg/ml penicillin, 50 mg/ml streptomycin, 100 mg/ml neomycin) (PSN Sigma, cat# P3664, USA), and amphotericin B (Fungizone™ 2.5 mg/ml, Sigma, cat# A2942, USA). The bottle was transported in a polystyrene foam box filled with ice bags pre-frozen at −80 °C and stored at 2 °C overnight. Following the method described by Kim and Tseng (1995), the placentas were washed twice in 500 ml sterile saline under a Class II safety cabinet (HERASAFE KS9; Thermo Scientific, Germany). The AM was separated from the chorionic membrane by blunt dissection, and the rest of the placenta was placed in a sterile stainless steel pan containing 500 ml Eagle’s Balanced Salt Solution (Sigma, USA; cat #E 3024 EBSS without phenol red) supplemented with PSN antibiotic mixture and amphotericin B antifungal. While submerged, the AM was scraped manually under aseptic conditions to remove all the debris until it became clear and transparent. Sterile circular nitrocellulose filters (pore size 0.2 µm, diameter 47 mm; Whatman®, Cat# 7187, Whatman Paper Limited, England) were used as a whole or cut into strips of different sizes along with pre-cut sterile nitrocellulose strips (pore size 0.2 µm; Protran® Whatman, cat# BA-83, Whatman Paper Limited, England) and used to hold the AM in the preservation medium during cryo-storage. The nitrocellulose filters/strips were placed over the stromal side of the AM, and the AM was cut around the nitrocellulose strips with a few millimeters of AM folded on the other side of the nitrocellulose strip. The AM with the adherent nitrocellulose filters/strips were transferred into 30-ml sterile polystyrene double-bagged containers (Sterilin, code# 128 DB/IRR, UK) containing 1:1 (v:v) mixture of Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM Sigma, cat#D 6171, USA) and autoclave-sterilized glycerol (Code 32509033, BioChemika, Sigma, UK) supplemented with PSN antibiotic mixture and amphotericin B antifungal.

For sterility test, the contents of a random bottle from each of the processing batches and 5–10 ml of the prepared mixture of culture medium and glycerol were inoculated in 300 ml Tryptic Soy Broth (3.0 g/l peptic digest of soya bean) (Code# 610053, Liofilchem Biotechnology Products, Italy) and thioglycollate medium (0.5 g/l sodium thioglycollate) (Code# 610050, Liofilchem Biotechnology Products, Italy). The bottles were incubated for 14 days at 32 ± 2 °C to detect any microbial growth as according to ISO 11737 (2006). The other bottles containing the AM strips were vacuum heat sealed (ALLPAX PT-MJ-4 DS; Allpax GmbH and Co. KG, Germany) and stored at −80 °C until released for surgical use. Upon receiving an allograft request from surgeons, the graft bottle was transported to the hospital in a polystyrene foam box filled with ice.

Patients indicated for surgery were informed before the day of the surgery about the study and the voluntary nature of participation. On the day of the surgery, the patient or his/her next of kin signed an informed consent form and the basic demographic data were recorded.

Patients

Twenty-six patients indicated for primary pterygium surgery were transplanted with AM grafts as an adjunctive treatment between October 2012 and December 2013. All of them had been evaluated pre-operatively for visual acuity and by slit-lamp examination of the anterior segment. No inclusion or exclusion criteria were imposed other than clinical indication as judged by the attending surgeons. The indication for AM graft was patients’ complaints of a feeling of discomfort, foreign body sensation, redness and astigmatism effects.

Surgical technique

Three surgeons at the Tripoli Eye Hospital participated in this study. The eye was anesthetized with 0.4 % oxybuprocaine hydrochloride (Cebesin, Bausch and Lomb, France). It was adequately exposed using an eyelid speculum and injected subconjunctivally with 1 ml of 2 % lidocaine solution (B-Braun, Germany). The head of the pterygium was excised from the cornea by avulsion, the pterygial fibrovascular growth was removed, and an avascular bed was created. The AM was placed on the eye surface with the epithelial side in contact with the eye and sutured to the episclera using 10-0 vicryl suture. Post-operation management of participants included patching the eye and giving oral antibiotics, analgesics and topical steroids. Patients were examined the following day and after 1 week. They were also scheduled for the follow-ups at 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery. Pictures of the operated eyes were taken pre and 1-day post-surgery with an Optomed Smartscope® M5 digital medical camera (Finland).

Results

Total of 183 AM grafts were prepared from six placentas. Sterility test of a sample from each of the six processing batches at the time of cryopreservation showed that all six batches were sterile.

AM grafts were used as adjunct therapy in pterygium surgery on 26 eyes of 26 patients (15 males, 57.7 %; 11 females, 42.3 %). Almost all of the patients were living in Tripoli or in nearby towns and working outdoors (e.g., drivers, field technicians, and housewives working on farms). Their ages ranged between 21 and 78 years with a mean of 48.2 years. Half of the patients were grafted with membranes cryopreserved for ≤180 days (mean 118 days) and another half with membranes cryopreserved for >180 days (mean 338 days).

Table 1 shows the presence of complications at the follow-ups. By the second visit, two patients developed recurrence of pterygium (7.7 %) and two developed granuloma (7.7 %) resulting in (15.4 %) overall rate of complications. Only 16 out of 26 patients presented themselves for the third visit, and a new case of recurrence was observed. Overall, for these 16 patients there were two cases of granuloma (12.5 %) and three of recurrence (18.8 %), giving an overall rate of complications of 31.3 % by the third follow-up.

Table 1 Follow-up visits and cumulative number of complications

By the second follow-up visit, of the 13 patients grafted with AM preserved for the shorter duration, three had recurrence and one developed granuloma. Of the other 13 patients, grafted with longer preserved membranes, only one had recurrence. Fisher’s exact test showed that there was no significant difference between the two groups in the development of granuloma or recurrence (P value = 0.3217), analysis performed using GraphPad Prism®, version 5. No infection or other complication was observed at any of the follow-up visits.

Discussion

Confirmation of sterility is extremely important in the preparation of AM grafts in order to avoid or minimise the potential risks to patients (Qureshi et al. 2010). Sterility test demonstrated the sterility of all the six processing batches, and no complication of infection or inflammation due to infected AM grafts was observed, which is in line with the previous studies (Liu et al. 2010).

Besides sterility, it is important that the preparation procedure and cryopreservation do not induce detrimental changes to the histological and biological properties of amniotic membranes (Thomasen et al. 2011). Previous studies indicated that morphological changes after AM cryopreservation were insignificant (Kruse et al. 2000). Meller et al. (2011) found that AM membrane can be preserved at −80 °C for 1–2 years before use. Essex et al. (2004) used AM preserved at −80 °C for 1–21 weeks and reported that the low success rate of AM grafts was not related to the deep freezing storage time. The AMs we used in surgery had been cryopreserved for up to 417 days or 1.1 year (average 223 days or 0.6 year), and the statistical analysis showed that the development of granuloma or pterygium recurrence was not statistically significant between the shorter (≤180 days) and the longer (>180 days) durations of AM cryopreservation (P value = 0.3217).

The literature shows that the success rate of using AM for preventing recurrence after primary pterygium is widely variable, but the causes of variability is unclear. The pterygium recurrence rate of 18.8 % following excision plus AM graft as obtained in this study is higher than those reported in other studies: 10.7 % (Tekin et al. 2001); 10.9 % (Prabhasawat et al. 1997); 12.9 % (Arain et al. 2012) and 13.8 % (Ebru and Eraslana 2016). On the other hand, our rate is lower than the 27.3 % reported by Kurna et al. (2012). Very high recurrence rates of 40.9 % (Tananuvat and Martin 2004) and 64 % (Essex et al. 2004) have also been reported for cryopreserved AM grafts. In the latter case, the authors suggested that the high rate could have been due to either defects in processing and storage or to the surgical technique.

We did not observe post-surgical complications such as conjunctival inflammation around the surgical site (Fig. 1). Kheirkhah et al. (2011) reported that conjunctival inflammation occurred in 84.2 % of cases after AM grafts were used for primary pterygium, while the recurrence rate of pterygium was 10.5 % and post-surgical pyogenic granuloma was 15.8 %, the latter of which is comparable to our granuloma rate of 12.5 %. We also observed no symptoms of AM graft rejection. This could have been due to the cryopreservation method, which greatly reduces the viability of AM epithelial cells (Kruse et al. 2000; Alireza et al. 2007).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Examples of eyes pre-surgery and one day after surgery for pterygium using cryopreserved amniotic membrane as an adjunct treatment

The rate of pterygium recurrence after using AM grafts is influenced by different factors such as inter-donor and intra-donor variations (Hopkinson et al. 2006), differences in the AM content of healing biomolecules such as growth factors and collagens, the health status of the host tissue around the AM graft (Liu et al. 2010), and post-surgery exposure to sun, especially in males (Torres-Gimeno et al. 2012). Other factors such as pterygium size and patient age or sex were found to have no association with pterygium recurrence (Essex et al. 2004).

One limitation of our study is the small sample size, which was further reduced by loss of a large proportion of patients in the follow-ups. Comparing to the second follow up, the third follow up complications were greatly influenced by an addition of only one recurrence case; leading to a noticeable increase in recurrence rate to 18.8 % and the overall complications rate was doubled to 31.3 %. Another limitation was the lack of an −80 °C freezer at the hospital causing logistic difficulties in delivering the grafts on the day of surgery.

Conclusion

The processing procedure and prolonged cryopreservation used in this study to prepare and preserve AM grafts was not associated with infection or inflammation, but the rate of pterygium recurrence was unacceptably high, though this rate was not associated with storage duration. The high rate of complications in this study was caused by the low sample size patients attended the proposed follow ups rather than due to the low AM efficacy. The locally produced cryopreserved AM is safe as an adjunct therapy for treatment of primary pterygium excision. The authors suggest an extended study using appropriate number of patients and independent controls in future trials. To overcome cold chain storage limitations; dried AM with the advantage of room temperature storage would be an interesting option for future applications.