Abstract
The objectives of our research were to determine the effect of supplementary food on the dispersion of the predatory bugs Macrolophus pygmaeus (Hemiptera: Miridae), Orius laevigatus and O. majusculus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) when released on a pest-infested or non-infested cucumber crop and to evaluate the effectiveness of O. majusculus, released together with the addition of supplemental food, on thrips control. The addition of dry Artemia sp. cysts as supplemental food to the plant where predators were released did not influence their dispersion from the release plant. Predators dispersed to the infested plants despite the provision of supplemental food on the release patch. In addition, in a greenhouse experiment, predator populations increased quicker when supplemental food was provided, resulting in a better thrips control. Altogether, our results suggest that the addition of supplemental food in the patch where predators are released may be beneficial for pest control in greenhouse cucumber crops.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The whitefly Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) and the thrips Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) are two of the most significant pests in greenhouse cucumber crops (Ramakers and O’Neill 1999). The whitefly produce honeydew, may cause plant weakening and be a vector for several significant viruses (Avilla et al. 2004). Thrips’ feeding and/or oviposition in the fruits have been reported to cause cosmetic damage, such as scarring and silvering spots. In addition, they can produce malformations in Dutch-type cucumber fruits that are long, thin-skinned and seedless (Rosenheim et al. 1990; Shipp et al. 2000; Welter et al. 1990).
In Europe and the Mediterranean basin, releases of predatory phytoseiid mites or Orius spp. (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) are used for the biological control of thrips (Castañé et al. 1999; Chambers et al. 1993; Messelink et al. 2006; Ramakers and O’Neill 1999; Shipp et al. 2004). However, broad-spectrum-insecticide-free crops may host significant populations of spontaneously occurring natural enemies, such as O. laevigatus (Fieber), O. majusculus Reuter and Macrolophus pygmaeus Rambur (Hemiptera: Miridae) (Riudavets and Castañé 1998). Until recently, the latter predator was misidentified as another Miridae species, M. caliginosus Wagner (=M. melanotoma (Costa)) (Castañé et al. 2013; Martinez-Cascales et al. 2006). All of these predator species are polyphagous and feed on different stages of B. tabaci and F. occidentalis (Arnó et al. 2010; Castañé et al. 1999).
Orius majusculus is commercially available and it can be an efficient biological control agent against cucumber pests. Compared to phytoseiid mites and other Orius species, O. majusculus is considered less pollen-dependent (Ramakers and O’Neill 1999), which is particularly relevant because most commercial cucumber varieties are ginoic hybrids, i.e., they only produce female flowers, and therefore do not have pollen. Furthermore, this predator can mainly be found on the leaves, where thrips larvae most often occur (Chambers et al. 1993; Ramakers and O’Neill 1999).
A drawback of using mirid and anthocorid bug predators in biological control is that it may take several weeks until their populations are built up at a level high enough to control the pests, especially at the beginning of the crop’s growth when prey are scarce. Longevity and fecundity of these omnivorous predators are clearly enhanced when females feed on prey compared to when they feed on the plant only (Portillo et al. 2012; Pumariño and Alomar 2012). This might be overcome by the addition of supplemental food, such as factitious prey or pollen, to enhance the efficacy of natural enemies, and therefore, contribute to improve biological control of pests (Messelink et al. 2014, Oveja et al. 2012; Perdikis et al. 2011; Put et al. 2012; van Lenteren and Manzaroli 1999). These food resources can be distributed uniformly over the plants or in patches. Since Orius, when released into an already established crop, is distributed in foci, food could also be locally provided on these same foci where predators are released. This will enable predators to monopolize the food and reduce the risk that food is used for pest population build up as suggested by van Rijn et al. (2002).
A common practice is the provision of Ephestia kuehniella Zeller (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) eggs, a highly nutritional factitious prey used to feed predators in the commercial mass rearing. However, these eggs are very expensive and other foods may have a similar potential to improve predator reproduction and survival (Riddick 2009). Artemia sp. (Branchiopoda: Artemiidae) cysts and bee pollen increase longevity and fecundity of O. laevigatus, O. majusculus and M. pygmaeus and may be good substitutes for E. kuehniella eggs (Arijs and De Clercq 2001; Bonte and De Clercq 2008; Castañé et al. 2006; Cocuzza et al. 1997; Perdikis and Lykouressis 2000; Portillo et al. 2012; Vandekerkhove et al. 2009; Vandekerkhove and De Clercq 2010). A possible disadvantage of adding supplemental food in the crop is that, depending on the quantity and quality of the food added, predators might not leave the patch where the food is (van Rijn et al. 2002), and therefore would not disperse into the crop. This would be counterproductive to controlling the pest, because early dispersion and crop colonization by predators were shown to be key elements in their ability to suppress pest populations (Wiedenmann and Smith 1997).
The studies reported in this paper had two objectives. The first was to determine the effect that supplementary food, in this case dry Artemia sp. cysts, had on the dispersion of the predators O. laevigatus, O. majusculus and M. pygmaeus, when released on a pest-infested or non-infested crop. The second objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of O. majusculus releases and the effect of food supplementation on the control of F. occidentalis in a greenhouse cucumber crop.
Materials and methods
Insects and supplemental foods used in the experiments
All insects used in the experiments were reared under controlled conditions at 25 ± 2 °C, 70 ± 20 % RH and a 16:8 h (L:D) photoperiod. All colonies were initiated with field specimens collected in vegetable crops in the Maresme (northeast Spain), except for F. occidentalis that were collected in the same area but from geranium flowers. Colonies were periodically refreshed with field specimens.
Macrolophus pygmaeus, O. majusculus and O. laevigatus were fed with E. kuehniella eggs. Macrolophus pygmaeus was reared on tobacco plants in aerated cages, whereas Orius spp. were maintained in ventilated glass jars (9.5 cm diameter, 14 cm height) and offered green bean pods as oviposition substrate and moisture source. Frankliniella occidentalis was also reared in the ventilated glass jars mentioned above and offered green bean pods as food, water source and oviposition substrate. Bemisia tabaci rearing was done in aerated cages on cabbage plants (Brassica oleracea L. var. Savoy King F1, Sakata Seeds Europe BV). Supplemental foods used in the experiments were non decapsulated dry cysts of Artemia sp. with a high unsaturated fatty acid content from Asiatic lakes (INVE Animal Health S.A., Dendermonde, Belgium) and finely ground pellets of dry commercial multifloral bee pollen (Mielar S.A, Barcelona, Spain).
Effect of supplemental food on predator dispersion
The experiment was performed in a plant growth climatic chamber using the controlled conditions mentioned above. Cucumber plants var. Marketer (Semillas Fitó®) were grown from seeds and kept in insect-proof cages in a greenhouse until the first true leaf expanded (approximately 2 weeks). Seven plants were placed in a methacrylate cage (57 × 58 × 48 cm) with side and top ventilation: six plants were situated on the vertices of an equilateral hexagon (48 cm in diameter) and the seventh one on the center of this hexagon, so that the distance between plants was always the same (24 cm). Four treatments were tested: (1) central plant with Artemia sp. and surrounding plants infested with thrips (tests with Orius spp.) or with whitefly (tests with M. pygmaeus), (2) central plant without supplemental food and surrounding plants uninfested, (3) central plant with Artemia sp. and surrounding plants uninfested and (4) central plant without supplemental food and surrounding plants infested with thrips (tests with Orius spp.) or with whitefly (tests with M. pygmaeus). When required, Artemia sp. cysts were supplied glued onto 2 cm2 areas of a Post-it® (0.008 ± 0.0002 g cm−2, n = 5). To infest plants with F. occidentalis, 3–4 days before the experiment the plants were placed in a separate cage and 20 thrips larvae per plant were added. To infest plants with whitefly, cucumber plants were placed in the B. tabaci rearing cages for 2 h to allow for egg laying, and then the plants were removed and placed in another cage for 24 h until the beginning of the trial.
Twenty female predators (age 1–7 days) were placed inside a vial and then carefully released on the central plant of each cage by unplugging and gently tapping the vial. The presence of predators on the surrounding one leaf cucumber plants was recorded every hour, for a total period of 6 h. The frequency of observations was set according to Venzon et al. (1999), who observed that the minimum residence time of O. laevigatus on a clean cucumber plant was longer than an hour. In each observation, all predators that were on the surrounding plants were carefully removed with a mouth-aspirator to ensure that they did not interfere by attracting or repelling predators that had not yet dispersed (Janssen et al. 1997, 1998). At the end of the 6 h period, the number of predators present on each of the seven plants inside the cage was counted separately. Each treatment was replicated ten times.
Effect of O. majusculus and supplemental food on F. occidentalis control
The trial was carried out in a plastic greenhouse (430 m2) divided into twelve large exclusion cages (6.40 × 4.50 m) with a fine plastic net of 10 × 20 gauge mesh in order to prevent insect movement between compartments. Each cage had four standard coconut fiber growbags (two bags per row) and two cucumber plants per bag, with a total of eight plants per cage that were transplanted on June 5, 2009. A Dutch-type cucumber cultivar Estrada (Semillas Fitó®) was used because the fruits of these varieties are highly susceptible to F. occidentalis. Plants were tied to strings, pruned as needed and maintained on a fertigation system. The temperature and RH were monitored using a digital data recorder (Hobo, Onset Computer Corporation, Massachusetts, USA), placed at 2.15 m above the ground in the middle of the greenhouse.
Four treatments were tested using a randomized complete block design with each treatment replicated three times. The treatments were: (1) F. occidentalis + O. majusculus, (2) F. occidentalis + O. majusculus + Artemia sp., (3) F. occidentalis + O. majusculus + Artemia sp. + pollen, (4) control treatment with only F. occidentalis. Seventeen days after transplant 22 second-instar thrips larvae were placed on each plant. The day after, when appropriate, a male and a female O. majusculus were released on each plant and Artemia cysts (0.1 g plant−1) or Artemia cysts plus pollen (0.1 + 0.1 g plant−1) were added directly on the leaves.
Starting the week after O. majusculus release, five weekly samplings were done on four randomly selected plants per cage. Each plant was sampled by randomly selecting three leaves: one from the top, one from the middle and one from the bottom of the cucumber plant. The number of O. majusculus adults and nymphs and the number of F. occidentalis adults and larvae were counted with the naked eye on each leaf. From July 24th to August 6th, fruits were harvested on four occasions, scoring the total number of fruits per cage, fruit weight and number of fruits that had cosmetic damage (silvering spots and scarrings) caused by F. occidentalis feeding on fruit.
Statistical analysis
To test the effect of supplemental food on the predators’ dispersion, a two-way ANOVA (addition or not of supplemental food on the central plants and infested vs. uninfested surrounding plants) was used to compare the number of predators remaining on the central plant at the end of the experiment and the cumulative number of predators on the surrounding plants at each sampling. In both analyses raw data were used for O. laevigatus and M. pygmaeus, whereas data for O. majusculus were transformed by log (x + 1) and by \( \sqrt {\left( {x + 0.5} \right)} \), respectively, to homogenize variances. Raw data are presented in tables and figures.
In the greenhouse trial, to assess the effect of O. majusculus and supplemental food on F. occidentalis control, all insect and fruit parameters evaluated were analyzed using a two-way ANOVA in a randomized complete block design. Only F and P values of the treatment comparisons are presented. The parameters analyzed were: cumulative insect-days, total fruit weight, total fruit number and total number of fruits with cosmetic damage. Cumulative insect-days were calculated according to Ruppel’s (1983) method by using the average number of F. occidentalis (adults and larvae) and O. majusculus (adults and nymphs) per plant. Number per plant was obtained as the mean insect counts on the three leaves sampled at each date.
In all tests, significant differences between means were identified by a Tukey’s test (P < 0.05). The data were statistically processed using the SAS Enterprise Guide 4.2 program.
Results
Effect of supplemental food on predator dispersion
When analyzing the effect of a supplemental food in the release patch on the dispersion of O. majusculus, O. laevigatus and M. pygmaeus (Fig. 1), the presence of Artemia sp. did not influence the number of predators remaining on the release plant at the end of the experiment: F 1,36 = 0.19, P = 0.669 (O. laevigatus); F 1,36 = 0.03, P = 0.855 (O. majusculus); F 1,36 = 0.08, P = 0.783 (M. pygmaeus). In contrast, the presence of pests on the surrounding plants (Fig. 1) did significantly influence the number of O. laevigatus and M. pygmaeus that remained on the release plant at the end of the experiment (O. laevigatus: F 1,36 = 9.77; P = 0.004; M. pygmaeus: F 1,36 = 9.31; P = 0.004), being higher when surrounding plants were uninfested. On the contrary, the thrips’ presence on the surrounding plants did not have a significant effect on the number of O. majusculus that, at the end of the experiment, remained on the central plant where they were released (F 1,36 = 2.32; P = 0.136).
When studying the process of colonization of the surrounding plants, no significant differences were observed between treatments with and without Artemia sp. cysts on the release point (Table 1). In contrast, the presence of B. tabaci and F. occidentalis on the surrounding cucumber plants did have a positive effect on colonization and predators dispersed faster in treatments with infested plants than with uninfested plants. As observed in Fig. 2, 1 h after O. laevigatus and O. majusculus were released, surrounding plants hosted a significantly higher number of predators when they were infested than if they were uninfested. This difference was maintained during the whole experiment (6 h). A positive effect of B. tabaci-infested plants was also observed with the colonization of M. pygmaeus. However, this effect was not significant up to four hours after the predators were released.
Effect of O. majusculus and supplemental food on F. occidentalis control
The inoculation of O. majusculus alone or together with the addition of supplemental food significantly reduced F. occidentalis infestation in cucumber plants (Table 2). In the first two samplings, conducted 1 and 2 weeks after predator release, the thrips population was significantly lower in the treatment with O. majusculus and cysts of Artemia sp. than in any of the other treatments. From the second count (July 7) and until the end of the experiment, F. occidentalis populations were significantly lower in all treatments with O. majusculus compared to the control without predators. Furthermore, in these samplings, lower thrips infestations were always recorded in the treatments with supplemental foods, except in the last count, conducted on July 29, when significant differences were only shown between the treatment with just O. majusculus and the treatment with predator +Artemia sp. cysts + pollen.
The predator O. majusculus was able to reproduce and become established in the crop and growing populations were recorded in the course of the experiment, especially in both treatments with supplemental foods (Table 2). When we consider the predator population dynamics in terms of cumulative insect-days during the period from July 7 to July 21, providing only Artemia sp. cysts as supplemental food significantly increased the O. majusculus population compared to when providing Artemia sp. and pollen (Table 2). However, in the last count, conducted on July 29, no significant differences were found in the predator population on plants of the treatments Orius + Artemia cysts and Orius + Artemia cysts + pollen.
Regarding fruit damage by F. occidentalis, no significant differences were found in terms of production (total number of fruits produced and total yield weight) nor in the number of fruits with cosmetic damage (Table 3): F 3,6 = 0.44; P = 0.733 (total number of fruits produced), F 3,6 = 0.92; P = 0.486 (total yield); F 3,6 = 4.02; P = 0.070 (number of damaged fruits). Nevertheless, the number of fruits with cosmetic damage was numerically higher in the treatment without predators than in treatments where O. majusculus specimens were released. The lowest number of damaged fruits was recorded in the treatment where Artemia and pollen were added.
Discussion
The results presented in this paper show that the addition of dry Artemia sp. cysts as supplemental food to the plants on which M. pygmaeus, O. laevigatus and O. majusculus were released did not inhibit their dispersion from these release plants. After 6 h, less than 50 % of the predators remained on the central plant. In contrast, the presence of the herbivore on the surrounding plants did have a positive effect on the colonization process of the predators. Orius laevigatus, O. majusculus or M. pygmaeus dispersed quicker from plants on which they were released, whether or not supplemental food was present, to plants infested with F. occidentalis or B. tabaci than to uninfested plants. In the 6 h experiment, between 15 and 35 % of the released insects reached the uninfested surrounding plants, whereas these percentages were 35–60 % when infested plants surrounded the release plant. Higher numbers of females of the two Orius species colonized plants infested with thrips from the very beginning. However, whitefly presence did not stimulate the colonization of surrounding plants by M. pygmaeus so fast. This could be explained by the fact that M. pygmaeus is a more energy-conservative species than is O. majusculus, which is a more actively searching predator (Montserrat et al. 2004).
It has been demonstrated that a predator’s success in finding prey is related to its ability to recognize volatiles that are released by plants damaged by herbivores (Dicke 1994; Pallini et al. 1997; Tumlinson et al. 1993). The faster Orius spp. colonization of thrips-infested plants compared to the M. pygmaeus colonization of B. tabaci infested plants may have been influenced by the different types of damage that both herbivores inflicted on the plants. It is known that the emission of plant volatiles is relatively specific to the type of insect feeding (Turlings et al. 1990). Insects, such as B. tabaci nymphs, that feed on phloem, do not inflict profound damage in plant tissues since they use their stylet to access the vascular tissue and extract phloem sap (Walling 2000). Thrips, however, damage the epidermal and parenchymatous tissues of the plant and inject saliva, while emptying the cell contents (Kindt et al. 2003), producing more mechanical damage. According to Rodriguez-Saona et al. (2002, 2003) a high level of mechanical damage increases the amount of plant volatiles released, while the attack by sucking insects produces less damage and, as a consequence, the amount of released volatiles by the plant is lower. Plants use these volatiles as a defense mechanism to attract natural enemies (Dicke 1999; Greany and Hagen 1981; Letourneau 1988; Tumlinson et al. 1993; Turlings et al. 1990; Vet and Dicke 1992). Different species of Orius have already been demonstrated to have a marked preference for the volatiles of plants attacked by herbivores, such as thrips and spider mites (Karimy et al. 2006; Tatemoto and Shimoda 2008; Venzon et al. 1999). Furthermore, M. pygmaeus has been described as being attracted to volatiles released by plants infested with whiteflies, lepidopteran leafminers, red spider mites and aphids (Ingegno et al. 2011; Lins et al. 2014; Moayeri et al. 2006, 2007).
In the semi-field test, O. majusculus successfully established in the cages where it was released and effectively controlled the F. occidentalis populations, whereas other Orius species, like O. laevigatus and O. strigicollis (Poppius), could not be established in cucumber crops, and therefore, could not control the thrips populations (Chambers et al. 1993; Kim et al. 2004; Rajabpor et al. 2011). In our experiment, prey populations decreased faster when only Artemia cysts were provided and this was evident as soon as 1 week after predator release. However, when Artemia cysts and pollen were supplemented together, reduction of the thrips population was not recorded until 2 weeks after predator release. This lag in the pest reduction may be due to the fact that pollen but not Artemia cysts promote F. occidentalis build up (Hulshof et al. 2003; Leman and Messelink 2015; Vangansbeke et al. 2015). In greenhouse experiments, van Rijn et al. (2002) and Leman and Messelink (2015) showed that although F. occidentalis feeds on pollen, the greater increase in predator population improves predator–prey ratio and benefits biological control. We did not observe this positive effect of pollen in our greenhouse experiment and this may be due to differences among predators used in the studies (predatory mites vs. anthocorid bugs).
Fruit quality is an important aspect to consider when pest control methods are evaluated, especially in greenhouse crops, due to the high capital investment and production costs involved. Fruits of Dutch-type cucumbers are especially sensitive to thrips, and therefore, the economic threshold for F. occidentalis is based on the cosmetic damage that this pest inflicts on the fruits (Rosenheim et al. 1990; Shipp et al. 2000; Welter et al. 1990). Although in our experiment, no statistical differences between different treatments were observed, the number of fruits with cosmetic damage was lower in cages where O. majusculus was released than in those without predators.
In summary, our results showed that predatory bugs disperse to the infested plants despite the provision of supplemental food on the release patch. Thus, the addition of supplemental food would not interfere with predator establishment in the infested crop and would provide nutritional resources to predators when the crop is not infested. In addition, the results presented in this paper indicate that the release of O. majusculus was very effective for controlling thrips in a greenhouse cucumber crop. The addition of supplemental food only once when predators were released improved their establishment, and the addition of Artemia cysts resulted in faster thrips control than the addition of Artemia cysts and pollen. However, since we conducted a short-term experiment in semi-field conditions, further verification under commercial conditions would be necessary before the strategy of releasing O. majusculus together with the addition of only Artemia can be recommended.
References
Arijs Y, De Clercq P (2001) Rearing Orius laevigatus on cysts of the brine shrimp Artemia franciscana. Biol Control 21:79–83
Arnó J, Gabarra R, Tong-Xian L, Alvin MS, Gerling D (2010) Natural enemies of Bemisia tabaci: predators and parasitoids. In: Stansly PA, Naranjo SE (eds) Bemisia: bionomics and management of a global pest. Springer, New York, pp 385–421
Avilla J, Albajes R, Alomar O, Castañé C, Gabarra R (2004) Biological control of whiteflies in vegetable crops. In: Heinz KM, van Driesche RG, Parrella MP (eds) Biocontrol in protected culture. Ball Publishing, Illinois, pp 171–184
Bonte M, De Clercq P (2008) Developmental and reproductive fitness of Orius laevigatus (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) reared on factitious and artificial diets. J Econ Entomol 101:1127–1133
Castañé C, Riudavets J, Yano E (1999) Biological control of thrips. In: Albajes R, Gullino ML, van Lenteren JC, Elad Y (eds) Integrated pest and disease management in greenhouse crops. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 244–253
Castañé C, Quero R, Riudavets J (2006) The brine shrimp Artemia sp. as alternative prey for rearing the predatory bug Macrolophus caliginosus. Biol Control 38:405–412
Castañé C, Agustí N, Arnó J, Gabarra R, Riudavets J, Comas J, Alomar O (2013) Taxonomic identification of Macrolophus pygmaeus and Macrolophus melanotoma based on morphometry and molecular markers. Bull Entomol Res 103(2):204–215
Chambers RJ, Long S, Helyer NL (1993) Effectiveness of Orius laevigatus (Hem, Anthocoridae) for the control of Frankliniella occidentalis on cucumber and pepper in the UK. Biocontrol Sci Technol 3:295–307
Cocuzza GE, De Clercq P, Lizzio S, van de Veire M, Tirry L, Degheele D, Vacante V (1997) Life tables and predation activity of Orius laevigatus and O. albidipennis at three constant temperatures. Entomol Exp Appl 85:189–198
Dicke M (1994) Local and systemic production of volatile herbivore-induced terpenoids: their role in plant-carnivore mutualism. J Plant Physiol 143:465–472
Dicke M (1999) Evolution of induced indirect defence of plants. In: Tollrian R, Harvell CD (eds) The ecology and evolution of inducible defences. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 62–88
Greany PD, Hagen KS (1981) Prey selection. In: Nordlund DA, Jones RL, Lewis WJ (eds) Semiochemicals: their role in pest control. Wiley, New York, pp 121–135
Hulshof J, Ketoja E, Vanninen I (2003) Life history characteristics of Frankliniella occidentalis on cucumber leaves with and without supplemental food. Entomol Exp Appl 108:19–32
Ingegno BL, Pansa MG, Tavella L (2011) Plant preference in the zoophytophagous generalist predator Macrolophus pygmaeus (Heteroptera: Miridae). Biol Control 58:174–181
Janssen A, Bruin J, Jacobs G, Schraag R, Sabelis MW (1997) Predators use volatiles to avoid prey patches with conspecifics. J Anim Ecol 66:223–232
Janssen A, Pallini A, Venzon M, Sabelis MW (1998) Behaviour and indirect interactions in food webs of plant-inhabiting arthropods. Exp App Acarol 22:497–521
Karimy A, Ashouri A, Kharazi Pakdel A, Goldansaz SH, Kosari AA, Moayeri HRS (2006) Olfactory response of the predatory bug, Orius albidipennis to volatile blends of strawberry and cucumber infested by spider mite. Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci 71:399–402
Kim DI, Park JD, Kim SG, Kim SS, Paik CH (2004) Biological control of Thrips palmi (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) with Orius strigicollis (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae) on cucumber in plastic houses in the Southern Region of Korea. J Asia Pac Entomol 7:311–315
Kindt F, Joosten NN, Peters D, Tjallingii WF (2003) Characterisation of the feeding behaviour of western flower thrips in terms of electrical penetration graph (EPG) waveforms. J Insect Physiol 49:183–191
Leman A, Messelink GJ (2015) Supplemental food that supports both predator and pest: a risk for biological control? Exp Appl Acarol 65:511–524
Letourneau DK (1988) Conceptual framework of three-trophic-level interactions. In: Barbosa P, Letourneau DK (eds) Novel aspects of insect-plant interactions. Wiley, New York, pp 1–9
Lins JC Jr, van Loon JJA, Bueno VHP, Lucas-Barbosa D, Dicke M, van Lenteren JC (2014) Response of the zoophytophagous predators Macrolophus pygmaeus and Nesidiocoris tenuis to volatiles of uninfested plants and to plants infested by prey or conspecifics. BioControl 59:707–718
Martinez-Cascales JI, Cenis JL, Cassis G, Sánchez JA (2006) Species identity of Macrolophus melanotoma (Costa 1853) and Macrolophus pygmaeus (Rambur 1839) (Insecta: Heteroptera: Miridae) based on morphological and molecular data and bionomic implications. Insect Syst Evol 37:385–404
Messelink GJ, van Steenpaal SEF, Ramakers PMJ (2006) Evaluation of phytoseiid predators for control of western flower thrips on greenhouse cucumber. BioControl 51:753–768
Messelink GJ, Bennison J, Alomar O, Ingegno BL, Tavella L, Shipp L, Palevsky E, Wäckers FL (2014) Approaches to conserving natural enemy populations in greenhouse crops: current methods and future prospects. BioControl 59:377–393
Moayeri HRS, Ashouri A, Brodsgaard HF, Enkegaard A (2006) Odour-mediated responses of a predatory mirid bug and its prey, the two-spotted spider mite. Exp Appl Acarol 40:27–36
Moayeri HRS, Ashouri A, Poll L, Enkegaard A (2007) Olfactory response of a predatory mirid to herbivore induced plant volatiles: multiple herbivory vs. single herbivory. J Appl Entomol 131:326–332
Montserrat M, Albajes R, Castañé C (2004) Behavioral responses of three plant-inhabiting predators to different prey densities. Biol Control 30:256–264
Oveja MF, Arnó J, Gabarra R (2012) Effect of supplemental food on the fitness of four omnivorous predator species. IOBC/WPRS Bull 80:97–101
Pallini A, Janssen A, Sabelis MW (1997) Odour-mediated responses of phytophagous mites to conspecific and heterospecific competitors. Oecologia 110:179–185
Perdikis D, Lykouressis D (2000) Effects of various items, host plants, and temperatures on the development and survival of Macrolophus pygmaeus Rambur (Hemiptera: Miridae). Biol Control 17:55–60
Perdikis D, Fantinou A, Lykouressis D (2011) Enhancing pest control in annual crops by conservation of predatory Heteroptera. Biol Control 59:13–21
Portillo N, Alomar O, Wäckers FL (2012) Nectarivory by the plant-tissue feeding predator Macrolophus pygmaeus Rambur (Heteroptera: Miridae): Nutritional redundancy or nutritional benefit? J Insect Physiol 58:397–401
Pumariño L, Alomar O (2012) The role of omnivory in the conservation of predators: Orius majusculus (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) on sweet alyssum. Biol Control 62:24–28
Put K, Bollens T, Wäckers FL, Pekas A (2012) Type and spatial distribution of food supplements impact population development and dispersal of the omnivore predator Macrolophus pygmaeus (Rambur) (Hemiptera: Miridae). Biol Control 63:172–180
Rajabpor A, Seraj AA, Allahyari H, Shishehbor P (2011) Evaluation of Orius laevigatus Fieber (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae) for biological control of Thrips palmi Lindeman (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on greenhouse cucumber in South of Iran. Asian J Biol Sci 4:457–467
Ramakers PMJ, O’Neill TM (1999) Cucurbits. In: Albajes R, Gullino ML, van Lenteren JC, Elad Y (eds) Integrated pest and disease management in greenhouse crops. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp 435–453
Riddick EW (2009) Benefits and limitations of factitious prey and artificial diets on life parameters of predatory beetles, bugs, and lacewings: a mini-review. BioControl 54:325–339
Riudavets J, Castañé C (1998) Identification and evaluation of native predators of Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) in the Mediterranean. Environ Entomol 27:86–93
Rodriguez-Saona C, Crafts-Brandner SJ, Williams L III, Paré PW (2002) Lygus hesperus feeding and salivary gland extracts induce volatile emissions in plants. J Chem Ecol 28:1733–1747
Rodriguez-Saona C, Crafts-Brandner SJ, Cañas LA (2003) Volatile emissions triggered by multiple herbivore damage: beet armyworm and whitefly feeding on cotton plants. J Chem Ecol 29:2539–2550
Rosenheim JA, Welter SC, Johnson MW, Mau RFL, Gusukuma-Minuto LR (1990) Direct feeding damage on cucumber by mixed-species infestations of Thrips palmi and Frankliniella occidentalis (Thysanoptera, Thripidae). J Econ Entomol 83:1519–1525
Ruppel RF (1983) Cumulative insect-days as an index of crop protection. J Econ Entomol 76:375–377
Shipp J, Wang K, Binns M (2000) Economic injury levels for western flower thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on greenhouse cucumber. J Econ Entomol 93:1732–1740
Shipp JL, Ramakers PMJ, Heinz KM (2004) Biological control of thrips on vegetable crops. In: Heinz KM, van Driesche RG, Parella MP (eds) Biocontrol in protected culture. Ball Publishing, Batavia, pp 265–276
Tatemoto S, Shimoda T (2008) Olfactory responses of the predatory mites (Neoseiulus cucumeris) and insects (Orius strigicollis) to two different plant species infested with onion thrips (Thrips tabaci). J Chem Ecol 34:605–613
Tumlinson JH, Turlings TCJ, Lewis WJ (1993) Semiochemically mediated foraging behavior in beneficial parasitic insects. Arch Insect Biochem Physiol 22:385–391
Turlings TC, Tumlinson JH, Lewis WJ (1990) Exploitation of herbivore-induced plant odors by host-seeking parasitic wasps. Science 250:1251–1253
van Lenteren JC, Manzaroli G (1999) Evaluation and use of predators and parasitoids for biological control of pests in greenhouses. In: Albajes R, Gullino ML, van Lenteren JC, Elad Y (eds) Integrated pest and disease management in greenhouse crops. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 183–201
van Rijn PCJ, van Houten YM, Sabelis MW (2002) How plants benefit from providing food to predators even when it is also edible to herbivores. Ecology 83:2664–2679
Vandekerkhove B, De Clercq P (2010) Pollen as an alternative or supplementary food for the mirid predator Macrolophus pygmaeus. Biol Control 53:238–242
Vandekerkhove B, Parmentier L, van Stappen G, Grenier S, Febvay G, Rey M, De Clercq P (2009) Artemia cysts as an alternative food for the predatory bug Macrolophus pygmaeus. J Appl Entomol 133:133–142
Vangansbeke D, Nguyen DT, Audenaert J, Verhoeven R, Gobin B, Tirry L, De Clercq P (2015) Supplemental food for Amblyseius swirskii in the control of thrips: feeding friend or foe? Pest Manag Sci. doi:10.1002/ps.4000
Venzon M, Janssen A, Sabelis MW (1999) Attraction of a generalist predator towards herbivore-infested plants. Entomol Exp Appl 93:305–314
Vet LEM, Dicke M (1992) Ecology of infochemical use by natural enemies in a tritrophic context. Annu Rev Entomol 37:141–172
Walling L (2000) The myriad plant responses to herbivores. J Plant Growth Regul 19:195–216
Welter SC, Rosenheim JA, Johnson MW, Mau RFL, Gusukuma-Minuto LR (1990) Effects of Thrips palmi and western flower thrips (Thysanoptera: Thripidae) on the yield, growth, and carbon allocation pattern in cucumbers. J Econ Entomol 83:2092–2101
Wiedenmann RN, Smith JW (1997) Attributes of natural enemies in ephemeral crop habitats. Biol Control 10:16–22
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Albert Mussoll, Pilar Hernández, Victor Muñoz and Francisca Oliver for their technical assistance. We also thank two anonymous reviewers and the editors for their valuable comments. This work was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO AGL2010-18811 and AGL2013-49164-C2-2-R projects). M.F. Oveja was supported by an FPI Grant from MINECO (BES-2008-007336).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Handling Editor: Patrick De Clercq.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oveja, M.F., Riudavets, J., Arnó, J. et al. Does a supplemental food improve the effectiveness of predatory bugs on cucumber?. BioControl 61, 47–56 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-015-9690-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10526-015-9690-3