Abstract
Previous studies have shown that Unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (URANS) computations are able to reproduce the vortex shedding behind a backward-facing step. The aim of the present work is to investigate not only the quantitative predictions of the URANS methodology concerning the characteristic frequencies, but also the amplitude of the energy of the resolved eddies, by using the Elliptic Blending Reynolds Stress Model. This innovative low-Reynolds number second moment closure reproduces the non-viscous, non-local blocking effect of the wall on the Reynolds stresses, and it is compared to the standard k − ε and LRR models using wall-functions. Consistent with previous studies, in the 2D computations shown in the present article, the vortex shedding is captured with the correct Strouhal number, when second moment closures are used. To complete these previous analyses, we particularly focus here on the energy contained in the unsteady, resolved part and its dependency on the numerical method. This energy is less than 5% of the total energy and is strongly dependent on the mesh. Using a refined mesh, surprisingly, a steady solution is obtained. It is shown that this behaviour can be linked to the very small spatial oscillations at the step corner, produced by numerical dispersion, which act as perturbations that are sufficient to excite the natural mode of the shear layer, when the local Peclet number, comparing convection and diffusion effects, is high enough. This result suggests that URANS is not appropriate to quantitatively predict the amplitude of the large-scale structures developing in separated shear-layers, and that URANS results must be interpreted with care in terms of temporal variations of forces, temperatures, etc., in industrial applications using marginally fine meshes.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Abe, K., Kondoh, T., Nagano, Y.: New turbulence model for predicting fluid flow and heat transfer in separating and reattaching flows–1. Flow field calculations. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 37(1), 139–154 (1994)
Archambeau, F., Méchitoua, N., Sakiz, M.: Code Saturne: a finite volume code for the computation of turbulent incompressible flows – industrial applications. Int. J. on Finite Volume, Electronical edn. http://averoes.math.univ-paris13.fr/html, ISSN 1634(0655) (2004)
Borello, D., Hanjalić, K., Rispoli, F.: Prediction of cascade flows with innovative second-moment closure. J. Fluids Eng. 127(6), 1059–1070 (2005)
Bosch, G., Rodi, W.: Simulation of vortex shedding past a square cylinder with different turbulence models. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 28, 601–616 (1998)
Carpy, S., Manceau, R.: Turbulence modelling of statistically periodic flows: synthetic jet into quiescent air. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 27(5), 756–767 (2006)
Choi, Y.D., Han, S.H., An, J.S., Shin, J.K.: Predictions of turbulent heat transfer of super-critical carbon dioxide flow in a square duct with an elliptic-blending second moment closure. In: Proc. 4th International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena, Williamsburg, 27–29 June 2005
Craft, T.J.: Developments in a low-Reynolds-number second-moment closure and its application to separating and reattaching flows. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 19(5), 541–548 (1998)
Daly, B.J., Harlow, F.H.: Transport equations in turbulence. Phys. Fluids 13, 2634–2649 (1970)
Driver, D., Seegmiller, H.L.: Features of a reattaching turbulent shear layer in divergent channel flow. AIAA J. 23, 163–171 (1985)
Driver, D.M., Seegmiller, H.L., Marvin, J.G.: Time dependent behavior of a reattaching shear layer. AIAA J. 25, 914–919 (1987)
Durbin, P.A.: Near-wall turbulence closure modeling without “damping functions”. Theor. Comput. Fluid Dyn. 3, 1–13 (1991)
Durbin, P.A.: A Reynolds stress model for near-wall turbulence. J. Fluid Mech. 249, 465–498 (1993)
Durbin, P.A.: Separated flow computations with the \(k\!-\!\varepsilon\!-\!{\overline{v^2}}\) model. AIAA J. 33, 659–664 (1995)
Ferziger, J.H., Perić, M.: Computational Methods for Fluid Dynamics, 3rd edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
Gatski, T.B. Rumsey, C.L., Manceau, R.: Current trends in modeling research for turbulent aerodynamic flows. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 365(1859), 2389–2418 (2007)
Hanjalić, K., Jakirlić, S.: Contribution towards the second-moment closure modelling of separating turbulent flows. Comput. Fluids 27(2), 137–156 (1998)
Iaccarino, G., Ooi, A., Durbin, P.A., Behnia, M.: Reynolds averaged simulation of unsteady separated flow. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 24, 147–156 (2003)
Johansson, S., Davidson, L., Olsson, E.: Numerical simulation of vortex shedding past triangular cylinders at high Reynolds number using a k − ε turbulence model. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 16(10), 859–878 (1993)
Kiya, M., Sasaki, K.: Structure of a turbulent seperation bubble. J. Fluid Mech. 137, 83–113 (1983)
Lardeau, S., Leschziner, M.A.: Unsteady RANS modelling of wake-blade interaction: computational requirements and limitations. Comput. Fluids 34, 3–21 (2005)
Lasher, W.C., Taulbee, D.B.: On the computation of turbulent backstep flow. Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow 13, 30–40 (1992)
Launder, B.E., Spalding, D.B.: The numerical computation of turbulent flow. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 3, 269 (1974)
Launder, B.E., Reece, G.J., Rodi, W.: Progress in the development of a Reynolds-stress turbulence closure. J. Fluid Mech. 68, 537–566 (1975)
Leschziner, M.A.: The flow in a channel with periodic ‘hills’ on one wall. In: Manceau, R., Bonnet, J.-P., Leschziner, M.A., Menter, F. (eds.) Proc. 10th ERCOFTAC (SIG-15)/IAHR/QNET-CFD Workshop on Refined Turbulence Modelling. Laboratoire d’études aérodynamiques, UMR CNRS 6609, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers (http://labo.univ-poitiers.fr/informations-lea/Workshop-Ercoftac-2002/Index.html) (2002)
Manceau, R.: An improved version of the elliptic blending model. Application to non-rotating and rotating channel flows. In: Proc. 4th International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena, Williamsburg, 27–29 June 2005
Manceau, R., Hanjalić, K.: Elliptic blending model: a new near-wall Reynolds-stress turbulence closure. Phys. Fluids 14(2), 744–754 (2002)
Manceau, R., Wang, M., Laurence, D.: Inhomogeneity and anisotropy effects on the redistribution term in Reynolds-averaged Navier-stokes modelling. J. Fluid Mech. 438, 307–338 (2001)
Parneix, S., Laurence, D., Durbin, P.A.: A procedure for using DNS databases. J. Fluids Eng. 120, 40–47 (1998)
Rotta, J.C.: Statistische Theorie nicht homogener Turbulenz. Z. Phys. 129, 547–572 (1951)
Speziale, C.G., Sarkar, S., Gatski, T.B.: Modeling the pressure-strain correlation of turbulence: an invariant dynamical system approach. J. Fluid Mech. 227, 245–272 (1991)
Thielen, L., Hanjalić, K., Jonker, H., Manceau, R.: Predictions of flow and heat transfer in multiple impinging jets with an elliptic-blending second-moment closure. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 48(8), 1583–1598 (2005)
Wee, D., Yi, T., Annaswamy, A., Ghoniem, A.F.: Self-sustained oscillations and vortex shedding in backward-facing step flows: simulation and linear stability analysis. Phys. Fluids 16(9), 3361–3373 (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fadai-Ghotbi, A., Manceau, R. & Borée, J. Revisiting URANS Computations of the Backward-facing Step Flow Using Second Moment Closures. Influence of the Numerics. Flow Turbulence Combust 81, 395–414 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-008-9140-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-008-9140-8