Abstract
Data envelopment analysis (DEA) is a mathematical approach to measuring the relative efficiency of peer decision making units (DMUs). It is particularly useful where no a priori information on the tradeoffs or relations among various performance measures is available. However, it is very desirable if “evaluation standards,” when they can be established, be incorporated into DEA performance evaluation. This is especially important when service operations are under investigation, because service standards are generally difficult to establish. The approaches that have been developed to incorporate evaluation standards into DEA, as reported in the literature, have tended to be rather indirect, focusing primarily on the multipliers in DEA models. This paper introduces a new way of building performance standards directly into the DEA structure when context-dependent activity matrixes exist for different classes of DMUs. For example, two sets of branches, whose transaction times are known to be different from each other, usually have two different activity matrixes. We develop a procedure so that a set of standard DMUs can be generated and incorporated directly into the DEA analysis. The proposed approach is applied to a sample of 100 branches of a major Canadian bank where different sets of time standards exist for three distinct groups of branches.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Ali, A. I., & Seiford, L. M. (1993). Computational accuracy and infinitesimals in data envelopment analysis. INFOR, 31(4), 290–297.
Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092.
Barr, R. S., & Siems, T. F. (1994). Predicting bank failure using DEA to quantify management quality. Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas Financial Industry Studies, 1, 1–31.
Berger, A. N., & Humphrey, D. B. (1997). Efficiency of financial institutions: international survey and directions for future research. European Journal of Operational Research, 98(2), 175–212.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429–444.
Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Golany, B., Seiford, L. M., & Stutz, J. (1985). Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions. Journal of Econometrics, 30(1/2), 91–107.
Chen, Y., Morita, H., & Zhu, J. (2003). Multiplier bounds in DEA via strong complementary slackness condition solution. International Journal of Production Economics, 86(1), 11–19.
Cook, W. D., & Hababou, M. (2001). Sales performance measurement in bank branches. OMEGA, 29, 299–307.
Cook, W. D., & Zhu, J. (2005). Building performance standards into data envelopment analysis structures. IIE Transactions, 37, 267–275.
Cook, W. D., & Zhu, J. (2006). Incorporating multi-process performance standards into the DEA framework. Operations Research, 54(4), 656–665.
Cook, W. D., Hababou, M., & Tuenter, H. (2000). Multicomponent efficiency measurement and shared inputs in data envelopment analysis: an application to sales and service performance in bank branches. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 14, 209–224.
Cooper, W. W., Seiford, L. M., & Tone, K. (2000). Data envelopment analysis: a comprehensive text with models, applications, references. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Golany, B., & Roll, Y. (1994). Incorporating standards via data envelopment analysis. In A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, A. Y. Lewin, & L. M. Seiford (Eds.), Data envelopment analysis: theory, methodology, and applications. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Sherman, H. D., & Gold, F. (1985). Bank branch operating efficiency: evaluation with data envelopment analysis. Journal of Banking and Finance, 9(2), 297–315.
Thompson, R. G., Langemeier, L. N., Lee, C. T., Lee, E., & Thrall, R. M. (1990). The role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to Kansas farming. Journal of Econometrics, 46, 93–108.
Zhu, J. (2003). Quantitative models for performance evaluation and benchmarking: DEA with spreadsheets and DEA Excel solver. Boston: Kluwer Academic.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cook, W.D., Zhu, J. Context-dependent performance standards in DEA. Ann Oper Res 173, 163–175 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-008-0421-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-008-0421-3