Skip to main content
Log in

Benefits of Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Restorative Proctocolectomy: A Comparative Study

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

PURPOSE:

Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy is thought to facilitate colonic mobilization while maintaining the benefits of laparoscopic surgery. Although previous studies of hand-assisted colectomy have focused on segmental colonic resection, the use of hand-assisted laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy has not been investigated. This study evaluated the effectiveness of hand-assisted laparoscopic approach compared with a conventional laparoscopic method in patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy.

METHODS:

From a prospective database, a consecutive series of patients were identified undergoing conventional and hand-assisted laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy and results were compared. Twenty-three patients, comprising 10 hand-assisted and 13 conventional laparoscopic patients, were identified. Patient characteristics, perioperative parameters, and outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS:

Both groups were well matched with no differences in age, gender, body mass index, operative indication, diagnosis, comorbidity, or steroid usage. There were no differences among incision size between the hand-assisted (8 (range, 8–20) cm) and conventional laparoscopic cases (8 (range, 5–10) cm). The median operative time was significantly shorter in the hand-assisted group (247 (range, 210–390) minutes) compared with the conventional laparoscopic group (300 (range, 240–400) minutes; P < 0.01). The length of stay was similar between groups (hand-assisted: 4 (range, 3–13) days vs. conventional: 6 (range, 4–17) days). Complications occurred in four hand-assisted patients (40 percent; 2 ileus, mechanical obstruction, and dehydration) and in four patients undergoing conventional laparoscopic method (31 percent; 2 anastomotic leak, ileus, and mechanical obstruction).

CONCLUSIONS:

Compared with conventional laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy, the hand-assisted method resulted in a significant reduction in operative time without detriment to bowel function, length of stay, or patient outcome. The hand-assisted approach to restorative proctocolectomy is likely to replace conventional laparoscopic methods as the preferred laparoscopic approach for this technically challenging procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. JW Milsom KA Hammerhofer B Bohm P Marcello P Elson VW Fazio (2001) ArticleTitleProspective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic vs. conventional surgery for refractory ileocolic Crohn’s disease Dis Colon Rectum 44 1–8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD38%2FnvVGjtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11805557

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. W Schwenk C Jacobi U Mansmann B Bohm JM Muller (2000) ArticleTitleInflammatory response after laparoscopic and conventional colorectal resections - results of a prospective randomized trial Langenbecks Arch Surg 385 2–9 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s004230050002 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7jtFSluw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10664112

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. JW Milsom B Bohm KA Hammerhofer V Fazio E Steiger P Elson (1998) ArticleTitleA prospective, randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report J Am Coll Surg 187 46–54 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1072-7515(98)00132-X Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1czitFClsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle9660024

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. AM Lacy JC Garcia-Valdecasas et al. (2002) ArticleTitleLaparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomised trial Lancet 359 2224–9 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09290-5 Occurrence Handle12103285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. JC Weeks H Nelson S Gelber D Sargent G Schroeder (2002) ArticleTitleClinical Outcomes of Surgical Therapy (COST) Study Group. Short-term quality-of-life outcomes following laparoscopic-assisted colectomy vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a randomized trial JAMA 287 321–8 Occurrence Handle10.1001/jama.287.3.321 Occurrence Handle11790211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. PW Marcello SK Wong (1999) ArticleTitleMeasuring outcomes of laparoscopic colectomy: is there an advantage? Semin Colon Rectal Surg 10 110–9

    Google Scholar 

  7. PW Marcello JW Milsom SK Wong et al. (2000) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: case-matched comparative study with open restorative proctocolectomy Dis Colon Rectum 43 604–8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c3osVKmsw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10826418

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. A Hashimoto Y Funayama H Naito et al. (2001) ArticleTitleLaparoscope-assisted versus conventional restorative proctocolectomy with rectal mucosectomy Surg Today 31 210–4 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MvjsV2jug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11318122

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. AJ Ky T Sonoda JW Milsom (2002) ArticleTitleOne-stage laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: an alternative to the conventional approach? Dis Colon Rectum 45 207–10 Occurrence Handle11852334

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. H Hasegawa M Watanabe H Baba H Nishibori M Kitajima (2002) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy for patients with ulcerative colitis J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 12 403–6 Occurrence Handle12590719

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. P Kienle J Weitz A Benner C Herfarth J Schmidt (2003) ArticleTitleLaparoscopically assisted colectomy and ileoanal pouch procedure with and without protective ileostomy Surg Endosc 17 716–20 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3s3hsFGltA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle12616394

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. QA Eijsbouts J Haan Particlede F Berends C Sietses MA Cuesta (2000) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic elective treatment of diverticular disease. A comparison between laparoscopic-assisted and resection-facilitated techniques Surg Endosc 14 726–30 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvpvVCksA%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10954818

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. InstitutionalAuthorNameAnonymous. (1999) ArticleTitleHandoscopic surgery: a prospective multicenter trial of a minimally invasive technique for complex abdominal surgery Southern Surgeons’ Club Study Group. Arch Surg 134 477–85

    Google Scholar 

  14. InstitutionalAuthorNameAnonymous. (2000) ArticleTitleHand-assisted laparoscopic surgery vs standard laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease: a prospective randomized trial. HALS Study Group. Surg Endosc 14 896–901

    Google Scholar 

  15. A Pietrabissa C Moretto A Carobbi U Boggi M Ghilli F Mosca (2002) ArticleTitleHand-assisted laparoscopic low anterior resection: initial experience with a new procedure. Surg Endosc 16 431–5 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD387psFSiug%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11928022

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. SD Wexner OB Johansen JJ Nogueras DG Jagelman (1992) ArticleTitleLaparoscopic total abdominal colectomy. A prospective trial Dis Colon Rectum 35 651–5 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:By2A3cnnslc%3D Occurrence Handle1535308

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. SL Schmitt SM Cohen SD Wexner JJ Nogueras DG Jagelman (1994) ArticleTitleDoes laparoscopic-assisted ileal pouch anal anastomosis reduce the length of hospitalization? Int J Colorectal Dis 9 134–7 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:ByqC3MvltFI%3D Occurrence Handle7814986

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. EM Targarona E Gracia J Garriga et al. (2002) ArticleTitleProspective randomized trial comparing conventional laparoscopic colectomy with hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: applicability, immediate clinical outcome, inflammatory response, and cost Surg Endosc 16 234–9 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD383jtVWrtg%3D%3D Occurrence Handle11967670

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter W. Marcello M.D..

Additional information

Reprints are not available.

About this article

Cite this article

Rivadeneira, D., Marcello, P., Roberts, P. et al. Benefits of Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Restorative Proctocolectomy: A Comparative Study. Dis Colon Rectum 47, 1371–1376 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0587-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0587-y

Key words

Navigation