Abstract
Recirculation of the leachate using bioreactor technology for in-situ treatment of leachate is an efficient method for reducing the contaminants and cost of ex-situ treatment as well. The current study was performed to evaluate the impact of leachate recirculation in anaerobic bioreactor on leachate treatment as well as municipal solid waste stabilization. The reactor was loaded with properly mixed 23.79 kg of solid waste with compaction of waste and total 20 L leachate was prepared in the bioreactor by adding water. Physico–chemical characteristics of leachate were estimated by using standards methods. The result reveals that the pH, alkalinity and VFA/ alkalinity were varied from 5.56 to 7.58, 7650 to 1875 mg/L and 1.44 to 0.44 which were within the optimal range of anaerobic digestion. Chemical oxygen demand is an indication of organic pollutants and 97% of COD removal was observed after leachate recirculation study. Quadric model was employed to investigate the behavior of operational parameters over time scale. Model indicated the highest phosphate decline (5.3%) with time but highest increase was observed for total kjeldhal nitrogen (4.3%). After completion of leachate treatment study, a 26.09% reduction in volume of MSW was found.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Appropriate management of solid waste has become a challenging task particularly in developing countries due to urbanization and industrialization [1]. Foremost, municipal solid waste (MSW) management possibilities involve composting, incineration and landfilling. Landfilling is a dominant approach used for disposal of MSW in developing countries due to its technological and economic aspects [2, 3]. In a traditional anaerobic landfill, adequate measures are required to avoid migration of leachate to groundwater and inflowing of peripheral water to the landfill [4]. The prospect of anaerobic energy generation is more ecofriendly and efficient than another [5,6,7]. Anaerobic degradation is a biological process that can be employed to treat organic portion of solid wastes. The extent of digestion process i.e. reduction of organic pollution load, biogas production and MSW stabilization is highly dependent on the operational setup, operating parameters, MSW composition, existing microbial population and reactor type [8, 9]. Recent investigations have revealed that the anaerobic decomposition process could be designed for municipal solid waste treatment and biogas production [10,11,12].
The large fraction of MSW consists of organic matter and when discarded in landfill, it undergoes conversions causing formation of leachate, an extremely contaminating discharge due to the complexity of its constituents, which contains huge quantities of organic pollutants estimated as chemical oxygen demand, suspended solids, nitrogenous compounds, heavy metals and significant amount of inorganic salts [13,14,15,16,17]. Hence, leachate must be treated or managed cautiously to decrease the adverse impact on environment, for instance stubborn organics can combine with organic compounds or heavy metals and transfer contaminants into the environment [18,19,20]. Based on the principle of anaerobic landfill, the bioreactor technology was developed for the reduction of leachate pollution load and fast solid waste stabilization [21,22,23]. The main purpose of an anaerobic bioreactor landfill is to increase microbial activities by leachate recirculation which accelerates the conversion and degradation of organic portion of solid waste [23,24,25,26,27].
Leachate recirculation improves the moisture content which in turn provides conditions for the effective transmission of substrates and nutrients for microbes, redistribution of enzymes and microorganisms throughout the waste mass and dilution of higher concentration of contaminants [28,29,30,31]. The rates of leachate recirculation maintain the stability among hydrological and biological processes of solid waste decomposition. In the initial phase of study, the higher rate of leachate recirculation should be implemented to increase dissolution of waste content and establishment of higher population of methanogens [32, 33]. Hussain et al. [34] proposed that initially increased leachate recirculation enhanced hydrolysis, decomposition efficacy and production of volatile fatty acid during acidogenic phase of organic waste. The rate of leachate recirculation is determined on the basis of the volume of MSW bed in a bioreactor. The leachate volume to be recirculated is calculated under different conditions i.e. 2%, 10%, 13% and 30% of MSW volume loaded in the reactor [35, 36]. The intensive rate of recirculation is where a larger volume (≥ 30% of the waste volume) of leachate recirculated through the waste bed. The intensive recirculation rate formed channels through the waste which increase the leachate flow and decrease the retention time of the leachate in the bioreactor [35]. The moderate rate of recirculation, where sufficient volume (10–20% of the waste volume) of leachate recirculated through MSW filled in bioreactor. The lower recirculation rate is where small volume (2% of the waste volume) of leachate recirculated through the waste. San and Onay [37], studied the impact of the leachate recirculation rate and recirculation approach on the anaerobic decomposition of MSW. The recirculated leachate volume of 2 L and recirculation approach of four times in a week were provided the maximum stabilization of MSW. Chugh et al. [35] stated that the methane generation rate and COD were dropped considerably when the leachate recirculated volume was 30% of the volume of MSW filled the bioreactor. Sponza et al. [36] reported that the increase in leachate recirculation rate from 9 L/day (13% of the reactor volume) to 21 L/day (30% of the reactor volume) influences the production of methane. The three times surge in recirculation rate caused reduction in cumulative methane production and increment in volatile fatty acid and COD concentrations were observed. The findings of this investigation indicated that the recirculation rate of 9 L/day enhances the biodegradation of MSW in anaerobic bioreactors. According to Li et al. [38] moderate leachate recirculation intensities contribute to reducing microbial consortium disruption, which enhances biogas production but intensive leachate recirculation provokes rapid vertical flow of leachate along preferential flow routes, causing insufficient consumption of existing moisture storage. Therefore, the leachate recirculation rates should be carefully chosen and optimized to minimize the disturbance and wash-out of the viable microbial consortium. In addition to this, other operational and design problems are at risk of environmental exposure if leachate is applied to the surface and requirement of liner, leachate and gas collection of management facilities. However, the study on effects of leachate recirculation on anaerobic degradation of MSW requires further investigation, particularly focused on continuous recirculation.
The present research aimed to observe the effect of leachate recirculation on MSW stabilization in cylindrical shaped anaerobic bioreactor. The physico–chemical characteristics of leachate from bioreactor were also investigated during leachate recirculation. Quadric model was applied to analyze the mode of operating parameters over time scale.
Material and methods
Characteristics of MSW
MSW samples were collected from the main dumping site of Hisar city. 2 kg of this mixed sample was collected in polyethylene bags, brought to the laboratory, and analyzed for moisture content immediately. The remaining samples were stored and analyzed for other important parameters.
The characteristics of MSW samples like moisture content (MC) and volatile contents (VC) were analysis according to ASTM standards [39, 40]. The total organic carbon (TOC) of the sample was analyzed with the help of TOC-V analyzer (Shimadzu) using zero air as a carrier gas. The other parameters i.e. total kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN), sulphur and phosphorus were analyzed in laboratory by using standard methods [41]. All the above physico–chemical characteristics of MSW were also analyzed after completion of leachate recirculation study.
Bioreactor set-up and operation
The Leachate Recirculation Bioreactor setup and dimensions are given in Fig. 1 and the composition of MSW used in bioreactor is shown in Table 1. The properly mixed 23.79 kg of MSW having volume 0.046 m3 was added by compaction to the bioreactor and total 20 L leachate was prepared in the bioreactor by adding fresh water. The bioreactor and leachate collection container were sealed air tight. The bioreactor was kept at steady state conditions for 15 days, afterwards the recirculation of the leachate was started and the bioreactor was operated under anaerobic conditions for 270 days. Leachate recirculation was done at moderate leachate recirculation rates @ 28 mL/min for 12 h daily in such a way that the 20 L collected leachate was completely recirculated because moderate leachate recirculation intensities contribute to reducing microbial consortium disruption, which enhances biogas production. Therefore, in order to achieve the purpose of continuous recirculation this moderate rate was preferred after reviewing literature. The 50 mL leachate samples were collected on weekly basis for first 5 months and per 2 weeks in last four months from the outlet port and analyzed for various physico–chemical parameters. The leachate volume was made up by adding distilled water equal to the volume of leachate samples collected and accordingly dilution factor was incorporated in the equation used for the calculations. The leachate collected in the vessel was recirculated into the reactor from the top with the help of peristaltic pump.
Analytical procedures for leachate samples
The physico–chemical characteristics of leachate i.e. pH, electrical conductivity (EC), alkalinity, chloride, calcium, magnesium, sodium, potassium, sulphate, phosphate, total Kjeldahl nitrogen (TKN) and chemical oxygen demand were analyzed using “Standard Methods of Analysis of Water and Wastewater” [41].
The volatile fatty acid (VFA) was analyzed with the help of Gas Chromatograph (PerkinElmer 680) using flame ionization detector (FID) and capillary column (Elite-WAX) having length 30 m and inner diameter (ID) 0.32 mm. The pH of samples maintained to 2–3 using ortho-phosphoric acid. The samples were filtered through a membrane having pore size 0.2 µm and dia. 25 mm using a syringe filter. A small amount (0.5 µl) of prepared sample was injected through an auto-injector for estimation [42].
Gas analysis
The composition of gases was analyzed with the help of Gas Chromatograph (PerkinElmer Clarus 680) using thermal conductivity detector (TCD) and Elite-Plot Q column (30.0 m length × 80.53 mm ID). Nitrogen was used as a carrier gas at a flow rate of 4.0 mL/min. The fraction of the gases was calculated using standard plots containing a mixture of CH4 and CO2 [42].
Quadric model
To capture the behaviour of different variables related to operating parameters (physico–chemical properties of leachate) of the study in relation to time, regression growth model was employed using SPSS 16 software. The data of physico–chemical properties of leachate collected on daily and weekly basis was converted to log scale and used for statistical analysis. Based on the results, quadric model was found best fit to evaluate the change in operational parameters over time scale. The quadric model determines the relationship between dependent variable Y and independent variable X.
The quadric model equation as below:
whereas, Y is the variable (operating parameter i.e. parameter of physico–chemical properties); X is the time; α intercept; β shows the change in Y with time (negative value means Y decreases with time and positive value means Y increases with time). ϒ shows the acceleration of change in Y with time (negative value means rate of change of Y diminishes with time and positive value means rate of change of Y increases i.e. accelerates with time); U is error term.
Results and discussion
The MSW stabilization through leachate recirculation was studied at lab scale in bioreactor operated under anaerobic condition. The results of change in leachate quality with time are shown in Table 2.
Characteristics of leachate
Initial phase of leachate recirculation determines the modification and acclimatization of MSW decomposition from aerobic to anaerobic phase. After initial adjustment and acclimatization the pH became near to neutral i.e. optimum. Optimum pH ranged from 6.5 to 7.5 for anaerobic degradation [43]. Up to 6th week of leachate recirculation study, the pH of the reactor was decreased from 6.45 to 5.56. It may be due to acidogenesis and formation of volatile fatty acids [44]. After initial decrease, an increase in pH was observed. This increase in pH may be due to onset of methanogenic activity. It results in increased methane production and decreased carbon dioxide, hydrogen and volatile fatty acid production [45, 46]. The pH value varied from 5.56 to 7.92 and ultimately remained at around 7.4. pH of the reactor shows the reactor was working effectively during the study period and anaerobic conditions were maintained properly in the reactor.
The leachate conductivity reflects total ionic concentration of solutes and is an extent of capacity of solution to conduct an electric current [47]. The value of leachate conductivity was 9.52 mS/cm in 1st week of recirculation, after that it increased upto 11.32 mS/cm till 9th week and further then it started to decrease with time. At the end of study, the minimum value of EC had observed and it was 5.35mS/cm. It might be due to formation of metal hydroxides which are insoluble [48].
Chloride is non-degradable in leachate and variation in its concentration is mainly used to estimate the leachate quality [49]. Decline in chloride concentration may be because it was chemically precipitated by their interaction with other substances present inside the bioreactor at suitable conditions of pH and other parameter. Decline in its concentration might be caused by the dilution effect of distilled water used to maintain total makeup of leachate [47]. The initial chloride concentration was observed 2627 mg/L and then it reduced to 1065 mg/L by the end of study period. Erses et al. [47] observed the dilution and washout effect on chloride and they observed 79% removal for chloride during anaerobic degradation of MSW in bioreactor landfill.
Hardness in form of CaCO3 was analyzed in the leachate sample. The hardness decreases with increased leachate recirculation [50]. Ca and Mg contents of the leachate samples showed variability due to more chemically reactive in nature and both are available as significant precipitants. During the leachate treatment period, initially hardness, calcium and magnesium increased and then decreased. This may be due to formation of CaCO3 and Mg(OH)2 precipitation and consumption of calcium and magnesium by the microorganisms [47]. Lohchab and Sigh [51] and Snehlata et al. [52] were also observed similar decreasing trend of hardness, Ca and Mg during leachate recirculation study.
The inorganic elements like Na and K act as nutrients for microbes. Potassium is the chief cellular inorganic cation and co-factor for certain enzymes whereas sodium maintains the osmotic regulation within microbial cells [13]. The results showed a decreasing trend of sodium and potassium concentration during the leachate recirculation period in anaerobic bioreactor. The initial sodium concentration in the leachate sample collected from the reactor was 529 mg/L, after that it tends to increase till 675 mg/L up to 5th week and at last it started to decrease with time and reached to 118 mg/L. The potassium in the leachate sample collected from bioreactor was reduced from 1050 to 195 mg/L at the end of recirculation study. The results of the present study corresponded with the finding of Reddy et al. [53]. They observed 66% reduction for sodium and 81% reduction for potassium.
During study period, value of phosphate in leachate sample was 33.48 mg/L in 1st week, after that it increased to 43.37 mg/L till 4th week and then, it started to decrease with time. At the end of study, phosphate concentration reduced to 9.11 mg/L. The phosphate concentration may be decreases due to its assimilation by microorganisms in the bioreactor. The similar investigation of leachate recirculation in anaerobic bioreactor showed similar decreasing trend of phosphate concentration [51]. Sulphate is used as micro nutrient for microbes but its higher concentration is inhibitor for the anaerobic digestion [13]. The initial value sulphate content in leachate sample was 284 mg/L which increased up to 435 mg/L and then, sulphate concentration started to decrease and reduced to 162 mg/L at the end of leachate recirculation study. In addition to it, most of the sulfur compounds were converted into the H2S gas, which cause decrease in the sulphate content of the reactor [54].
Most of nitrogen in the bioreactor is ammonia produced during degradation of protein [55]. Initial concentration of TKN in leachate sample was 645 mg/L, which increased to maximum (1050 mg/L) on 8th week of recirculation. After that there was a gradual decrease to minimum level of 192 mg/L at the end of study. Initially increase in nitrogen may be due to liberation of organically bound nitrogen during decomposition of waste. Nain and Lohchab [56] observed the similar decreasing trend of TKN in anaerobic bioreactor study.
The variation in concentration of volatile fatty acid with time seems to be a significant parameter for estimation of MSW decomposition [57]. Initially, the concentration of VFA was increased from 3400 to 7960 mg/L upto 7th week of recirculation. It may be due to accumulation of organic acids by hydrolysis and acidogenesis. Acidogens are most effective at pH 5.5–6.5. Their concentration grows quickly by conversion of complex organic compounds into VFAs [58]. The result was consistent with other studies that in a conventional landfill, VFA contents reached to its highest level before decreasing due to the establishment of methanogenic phase [20, 59]. After that VFA shows the decreasing trend and reached minimum level of 970 mg/L at the end of study. The VFA concentration reduced as the daily biogas production increased, this may be due to utilization of VFA by methanogenic bacteria as a substrate to produce biogas and new cells.
Alkalinity is essential to maintain optimum pH for maximum microbial activity [60]. The initial value of alkalinity in leachate sample was 7650 mg/L and at the end of study it gets reduced to 1925 mg/L. The value of alkalinity in leachate sample collected from reactor shows the decreasing trends during treatment. Alkalinity greater than 2000 mg/L in the reactor indicated adequate alkalinity to maintain optimum condition for methanogenesis [61]. After 32th weeks of recirculation, the reactor alkalinity was less than 2000 mg/L. This may be due to dissolution and precipitation of metals carbonates [62].
The VFA/Alkalinity is a measure of buffering capacity which reflects stability of bioreactor. The lower ratio usually imitates higher efficiency of anaerobic degradation [63]. Initially, VFA/Alkalinity was increased from 0.44 to 1.40 due to increase in VFA concentration during acidogenic phase, then it was gradually decrease and reached a minimum to 0.50 (Fig. 2). The ratio was observed within the limits of operational condition during the methanogenic phase i.e. less than 0.8 [64]. Result clearly shows that performance of the reactor was excellent as VFA/Alkalinity was in optimum range with maximum biogas yield during the methanogenic phase.
After slight decline, the COD in the bioreactor increased significantly at the beginning i.e. reached 33,312 mg/L till 6th week. This is due to hydrolysis and leaching of soluble organic and inorganic compound from solid waste into leachate. After initial increase it started to decrease with minimum value 1025 mg/L at the end of leachate recirculation. This decrease in COD may be due to fast decomposition of solid wastes under anaerobic condition resulting in conversion of VFA into CH4, CO2, and H2S etc. [36]. These results are similar to the outcomes of Han et al. [23], they reported 93.01%, 96.85% and 95.74% of COD removal. The similar trends of reduction were also observed in the other investigations [52, 57, 66–68].
Quadric model discussion
To capture the change in operating parameters over time, by using regression analysis, the quadric regression model was identified/ selected on the basis goodness of fit criteria. The correlation coefficient (R2) value of 0.696 or more and p value (significance F) close to 0 of the quadric model showed that model was best fit. The observed values and predicted values were compared for each case to check the model suitability and Fig. 3 shows that the variance patterns of the observed values and the predicted values are similar for every case. The estimated results of the model are presented in Table 3. The term ‘Y’ is a variable which denotes different operating parameters i.e. parameters of physico-chemical properties. ‘β’ shows the change in operating parameters with time. The negative value of β means the operating parameter (Y) decreases with time and positive value means parameter increases with time. ‘ϒ’ denotes the rate of change of operating parameters. The negative value of ϒ means rate of change of parameter (Y) decreases with time and positive value of ϒ means rate of change of Y increases with time i.e. accelerates with time.
The positive value of β (0.029) in result shows that pH was increased with time. The rate of increase of pH with time was 2.9%. The value of ϒ (0.00) denotes that the rate of pH increment does not increase or decrease with time, though the change of acceleration was zero. The alkalinity has negative value of β (− 0.015) which shows decline in alkalinity was 1.5% with per unit time. The negative value of ϒ (− 0.001) shows that the rate of reduction in alkalinity content decreases with time with a rate of 0.1%. The negative values of β for chloride (− 0.010) and sulphate (− 0.046) represent the decreasing trends in their contents with per unit time, but acceleration of change are zero because the value of ϒ is 0.00. The amount of decline per unit of time was 1% for chloride and 4.6% for sulphate, respectively. The rate of reduction of magnesium and sodium with time was 1.5% and 0.9%. The negative value of ϒ exhibits that the rates of decline in magnesium and sodium quantity was decreased with time at a rate 0.2%. The result also reveals that the phosphate was decreased with time at a rate 5.3% and rate of reduction of phosphate has been decreased with time at a rate 0.008%. The phosphate has shown highest amount (5.3%) of decline with time but decrease in acceleration was lowest. This decrease in phosphate may be due to its uptake by microbes for their growth and multiplication. The quadric model showed that with time electric conductive increase was 2.8% with diminishing rate 0.2%, total hardness increase was 0.9% with diminishing rate 0.3%, total kjeldahl nitrogen increase was 4.3% with diminishing rate 0.3%, potassium increase was 0.7% with diminishing rate 0.3%, volatile fatty acid increase was 1.3% with diminishing rate 0.6% and chemical oxygen demand increase was 3.4% with diminishing rate 0.5%. The amount of increase was highest in case of total kjeldahl nitrogen 4.3% with highest diminishing rate of 0.3%. These trends of quadric modelling are similar with trends of observed values.
Above trends of quadric modelling as well as observed values of most parameters of leachate during their recirculation indicate that the organic and inorganic contaminants levels of leachate were increased initially during hydrolysis and solubilisation of MSW but as MSW degradation/stabilization progressed with time they had decreased.
Biogas production
Biogas production rate and cumulative biogas production during leachate recirculation study are presented in Fig. 4. The changes in composition of methane and carbon dioxide in biogas during study period are shown in Fig. 5. The biogas generation in bioreactor was started from 2nd week of recirculation and it was exponentially increase from 6th week. The highest biogas production rate of 18 L/day was observed on the 18th week of leachate recirculation (Fig. 4). The methane percentage of biogas was also highest during this week and it was about 67.8% (Fig. 5). The methane peak percentage was noted 69.50% in anaerobic bioreactor [68]. Xu et al. [21] also noticed methane content about 68% during the anaerobic phase. The major gases formed during anaerobic degradation of MSW were methane and CO2. Initially methane content was lower up to 6th week and after that a gradual increase in CH4 contents was observed with progress of MSW degradation. The average composition of biogas in bioreactor during the study period was 50% CH4 and 30.8% CO2. During methanogenic phase, methane (40–70%) and carbon dioxide (30–60%) are two major constituents of landfill gas [69]. The maximum methane production rate of 12 L/day was observed in 18th week. The result is consistent with the outcomes of San and Onay [37] and Erses et al. [47]. The cumulative biogas and methane productions were 1876 L and 938 L during the leachate recirculation study period. Erses et al. [47] determined maximum yield of methane as 158 L/kg dry refuse. Other studies have reported methane generation in the range of 20–170 L CH4/kg-dry waste [21, 65, 66, 68,69,70,71].
Stabilization of MSW
The characteristics of MSW before and after anaerobic treatment in bioreactor are shown in Table 4. The most crucial parameter enhancing waste degradation is the moisture content of the waste. Leachate recirculation provides necessary moisture content in the reactor which enhances the treatment of MSW as well as leachate recirculating through bioreactor. After leachate recirculation study, volatile contents were reduced to 45%. The total organic carbon and TKN were reduced to 40% and 29% which may be discharged into leachate or gaseous phase. Similar study showed 30% reduction in carbon and 10% reduction in nitrogen [72]. Moreover, 43% and 27% reduction in phosphorus and sulphur contents were observed. The depth of MSW used in bioreactor was reduced from 65.5 cm to 25.8 at the end of study. Initially, the stabilization of solid waste in bioreactor was observed 5–8% that may be due to the self-weight of MSW. The solid waste will also undergo fast and composite settlements as the result of self-weight and biological degradation when leachate recirculation is implemented along with a bioreactor technology [27, 73, 74]. At the end of leachate recirculation study, 25.8% settlement was observed in anaerobic bioreactor (Fig. 6). The MSW settlement provides more space for solid waste reached at the dumping site which increases the closure period of the site. The similar observations were observed in the investigations performed by [66, 67, 75].
Solid waste management system is very poor in India and requires research in this field according to local conditions. Large part of MSW in Hisar and other cities of India remain unattended due to lack of information of the waste generation and their management technologies. This research provides the base for proper utilization of MSW according to local need and resources in eco-friendly manner with generation biogas as an energy source. Leachate recirculation bio-landfill can reduce the long-term risk in addition to several other advantages. The biogas and leachate analysis is performed on the weekly leachate recirculation basis at lab scale; though data of precise estimation of this process with field study is unavailable and impacts of individual operating parameters are to be investigated separately. The anaerobic bioreactor at different scales shows similar performances and demonstrates better efficiency in eliminating leachate contamination in terms COD, alkalinity, VFA, TKN etc. Leachate recirculation bioreactor landfill is one of the most significant and cost-effective technique for enhanced biodegradation and MSW stabilization (Table 5). Therefore, this cost effective and environmentally sound technology can be adopted after suspicious research and precautions.
Conclusion
After initial increase, a decreasing trend was observed in most of the physico–chemical parameters during the leachate treatment period. Removal of chloride, calcium, magnesium, sodium, potassium, phosphate, sulphate and TKN were 66%, 92%, 82%, 83%, 84%, 79%, 63% and 82%, respectively. The cations and anions present in leachate were used as a source of nutrients by the microbes, therefore their concentration were reduced due to their consumption by the microbes during anaerobic digestion of leachate in bioreactor.
The quadric model indicated that phosphate had highest amount of decline with time but sodium has lowest. Whereas, TKN has shown highest amount of increase with time but potassium has lowest. Subsequently, quadric modelling represented that the organic and inorganic pollutants of leachate were decreased and pH was increased with time.
The pH, alkalinity and VFA are important parameters which govern the working of bioreactors under anaerobic conditions and all these parameters were within optimum range of anaerobic treatment. The COD is the best indicator of pollution load of the leachate and the maximum COD reduction was 97%, whereas the reduction in the VFA was 88%. High reduction of COD and VFA indicate that the reactor working efficiency was very high. Therefore, the bioreactor landfill is another suitable option for disposal of the solid waste. One of the most significant and cost-effective technique for enhancing biodegradation in a bioreactor landfill is the leachate recirculation.
References
Taghipour H, Amjad Z, Aslani H, Armanfar F, Dehghanzadeh R (2016) Characterizing and quantifying solid waste of rural communities. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 18:790–797
Miao L, Yang G, Tao T, Peng Y (2019) Recent advances in nitrogen removal from landfill leachate using biological treatments–a review. J Environ Manage 235:178–185
Yu Y, Li M, Dai X, Meng F, Qi X, Hou J, Ye M, Xi B (2019) In situ mature leachate treatment with hydroxylamine addition in the Aerobic–Anaerobic Recirculation Landfill. Sci Total Environ 696:134084
Zhao Y, Lou Z (2017) Chapter three—leachate generation processes and property at sanitary landfill. In: Youcai Z, Ziyang L (eds) Pollution control and resource recovery. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, pp 93–145
Xu F, Li Y, Ge X, Yang L, Li Y (2018) Anaerobic digestion of food waste–challenges and opportunities. Bioresour Technol 247:1047–1058
Negi S, Dhar H, Hussain A, Kumar S (2018) Biomethanation potential for co-digestion of municipal solid waste and rice straw: a batch study. Bioresour Technol 254:139–144
Martí-Herrero J, Soria-Castellón G, Diaz-de-Basurto A, Alvarez R, Chemisana D (2019) Biogas from a full scale digester operated in psychrophilic conditions and fed only with fruit and vegetable waste. Renew Energy 133:676–684
Li Y, Jin Y, Borrion A, Li H, Li J (2017) Effects of organic composition on mesophilic anaerobic digestion of food waste. Bioresour Technol 244:213–224
Eryildiz B, Taherzadeh MJ (2020) Effect of pH, substrate loading, oxygen, and methanogens inhibitors on volatile fatty acid (VFA) production from citrus waste by anaerobic digestion. Bioresour Technol 302:122800
Yin J, Yu X, Zhang Y, Shen D, Wang M, Long Y, Chen T (2016) Enhancement of acidogenic fermentation for volatile fatty acid production from food waste: effect of redox potential and inoculum. Bioresour Technol 216:996–1003
Zhou M, Yan B, Wong JW, Zhang Y (2018) Enhanced volatile fatty acids production from anaerobic fermentation of food waste: a mini-review focusing on acidogenic metabolic pathways. Bioresour Technol 248:68–78
Wainaina S, Lukitawesa, Awasthi MK, Taherzadeh MJ (2019) Bioengineering of anaerobic digestion for volatile fatty acids, hydrogen or methane production: a critical review. Bioengineered 10:437–458
Renou S, Givaudan JG, Poulain S, Dirassouyan F, Moulin P (2008) Landfill leachate treatment: review and opportunity. J Hazard Mater 150:468–493
Foul AA, Aziz HA, Isa MH, Hung YT (2009) Primary treatment of anaerobic landfill leachate using activated carbon and limestone: batch and column studies. Int J Environ Waste Manag 4:282–298
Aziz SQ, Aziz HA, Yusoff MS, Bashir MJ, Umar M (2010) Leachate characterization in semi-aerobic and anaerobic sanitary landfills: a comparative study. J Environ Manage 91:2608–2614
Hussein M, Yoneda K, Zaki ZM, Amir A (2019) Leachate characterizations and pollution indices of active and closed unlined landfills in Malaysia. Environ Nanotechnol Monit Manag 12:100232
Costa AM, Alfaia RGDSM, Campos JC (2019) Landfill leachate treatment in Brazil—an overview. J Environ Manage 232:110–116
Wu Y, Zhou S, Ye X, Zhao R, Chen D (2011) Oxidation and coagulation removal of humic acid using Fenton process. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 379:151–156
Deng Y, Chen N, Feng C, Chen F, Wang H, Feng Z, Zheng Y, Kuang P, Hu W (2019) Research on complexation ability, aromaticity, mobility and cytotoxicity of humic-like substances during degradation process by electrochemical oxidation. Environ Pollut 251:811–820
Gu Z, Chen W, Wang F, Li Q (2020) A pilot-scale comparative study of bioreactor landfills for leachate decontamination and municipal solid waste stabilization. Waste Manage 103:113–121
Xu Q, Tian Y, Wang S, Ko JH (2015) A comparative study of leachate quality and biogas generation in simulated anaerobic and hybrid bioreactors. Waste Manage 41:94–100
Cossu R, Grossule V (2018) 14.3—landfill bioreactors. In: Cossu R, Stegmann R (eds) Solid waste landfilling. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 831–841
Han Z, Zeng D, Mou Z, Shi G, Zhang Y, Lou Z (2019) A novel spatiotemporally anaerobic/semi-aerobic bioreactor for domestic solid waste treatment in rural areas. Waste Manage 86:97–105
Han ZY, Liu D, Li QB (2013) A removal mechanism for organics and nitrogen in treating leachate using a semi-aerobic aged refuse biofilter. J Environ Manage 114:336–342
Aguilar-Virgen Q, Taboada-González P, Ojeda-Benítez S (2014) Analysis of the feasibility of the recovery of landfill gas: a case study of Mexico. J Clean Prod 79:53–60
Cossu R, Morello L, Raga R, Cerminara G (2016) Biogas production enhancement using semi-aerobic pre-aeration in a hybrid bioreactor landfill. Waste Manage 55:83–92
Feng S, Fu W, Zhou A, Lyu F (2019) A coupled hydro-mechanical-biodegradation model for municipal solid waste in leachate recirculation. Waste Manage 98:81–91
Degueurce A, Tomas N, Le Roux S, Martinez J, Peu P (2016) Biotic and abiotic roles of leachate recirculation in batch mode solid-state anaerobic digestion of cattle manure. Bioresour Technol 200:388–395
Li Y, Yan F, Li T, Zhou Y, Jiang H, Qian M, Xu Q (2018) High-solid anaerobic digestion of corn straw for methane production and pretreatment of bio-briquette. Bioresour Technol 250:741–749
Nwaokorie KJ, Bareither CA, Mantell SC, Leclaire DJ (2018) The influence of moisture enhancement on landfill gas generation in a full-scale landfill. Waste Manage 79:647–657
Luo L, Wong JW (2019) Enhanced food waste degradation in integrated two-phase anaerobic digestion: effect of leachate recirculation ratio. Bioresour Technol 291:121813
White JK, Beaven RP, Powrie W, Knox K (2011) Leachate recirculation in a landfill: some insights obtained from the development of a simple 1-D model. Waste Manage 31:1210–1221
Nag M, Shimaoka T, Komiya T (2018) Influence of operations on leachate characteristics in the Aerobic-Anaerobic Landfill Method. Waste Manage 78:698–707
Hussain A, Filiatrault M, Guiot SR (2017) Acidogenic digestion of food waste in a thermophilic leach bed reactor: effect of pH and leachate recirculation rate on hydrolysis and volatile fatty acid production. Bioresour Technol 245:1–9
Chugh S, Clarke W, Pullammanappallil P, Rudolph V (1998) Effect of recirculated leachate volume on MSW degradation. Waste Manage 16:564–573
Sponza DT, Agdag ON (2004) Impact of leachate recirculation and recirculation volume on stabilization of municipal solid wastes in simulated anaerobic bioreactors. Process Biochem 39:2157–2165
San I, Onay TT (2001) Impact of various leachate recirculation regimes on municipal solid waste degradation. Hazard Mater 87:259–271
Li C, Tao Y, Fang J, Li Q, Lu W (2020) Impact of continuous leachate recirculation during solid state anaerobic digestion of Miscanthus. Renew Energy 154:38–45
ASTM D2974-20e1 (2020) Standard Test Methods for Determining the Water (Moisture) Content, Ash Content, and Organic Material of Peat and Other Organic Soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken
ASTM D3175-07 (2007) Standard Test Method for Volatile Matter in the Analysis Sample of Coal and Coke 1. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA. https://doi.org/10.1520/D3175-07.2
APHA (2015) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 23rd edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC
Prajapati KB, Singh R (2020) Bio-electrochemically hydrogen and methane production from co-digestion of wastes. Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117259
Khanal SK (2008) Bioenergy generation from residues of biofuel industries. Anaerobic biotechnology for bioenergy production: principles and applications. Wiley-Blackwell, New York, pp 161–187
Bohdziewicz J, Kwarciak A (2008) The application of hybrid system UASB reactor-RO in landfill leachate treatment. Desalination 222:128–134
Lohchab RK, Nain A (2017) Municipal solid waste stabilization by leachate recirculation. IAHRW Publications, New Delhi
Feng S, Hong X, Wang T, Huang X, Tong Y, Yang H (2019) Reutilization of high COD leachate via recirculation strategy for methane production in anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste: Performance and dynamic of methanogen community. Bioresour Technol 288:121509
Erses AS, Onay TT, Yenigun O (2008) Comparison of aerobic and anaerobic degradation of municipal solid waste in bioreactor landfills. Bioresour Technol 99:5418–5426
Rich C, Gronow J, Voulvoulis N (2008) The potential for aeration of MSW landfills to accelerate completion. Waste Manage 28:1039–1048
Rafizul IM, Subbir Y, Alamgir M (2014) Lysimeter studies for leachate characterization generated from municipal solid waste in pilot scale landfill of Bangladesh. J Solid Waste Technol Manag 40:311–326
Gawalpanchi RR, Mhaisalkar VA, Hiraou S, Bhide AD (2007) Treatment of leachate by recirculation through a bioreactor. In: Proceedings of the international conference on sustainable solid waste management. Chennai, pp 460–465
Lohchab RK, Singh U (2017) Performance evaluation of a landfill leachate recirculation treatment system using quadric model. J Environ Biol 38:1313–1320
Snehlata LR, Nain A (2015) Anaerobic treatment of MSW using leachate recirculation bioreactor: a case study of Rohtak City. Nat Environ Pollut Technol 14:919
Reddy CV, Rao DS, Kalamdhad AS (2020) Statistical modelling and assessment of landfill leachate emission from fresh municipal solid waste: a laboratory-scale anaerobic landfill simulation reactor study. Waste Manag Res 38:1161–1175
Camacho A (2010) Sulfur bacteria. Plankton of Inland Waters. Academic Press, New York, pp 65–82
Kjeldsen P, Barlaz MA, Rooker AP, Baun A, Ledin A, Christensen TH (2002) Present and long-term composition of MSW landfill leachate: a review. Crit Rev Env Sci Technol 32:297–336
Nain A, Lohchab RK (2015) Anaerobic treatment of MSW of Hansi in leachate recirculation bioreactor. Ann Biol 31:46–50
Karthikeyan OP, Swati M, Nagendran R, Joseph K (2007) Performance of bioreactor landfill with waste mined from a dumpsite. Environ Monit Assess 135:141–151
Mao C, Wang X, Xi J, Feng Y, Ren G (2017) Linkage of kinetic parameters with process parameters and operational conditions during anaerobic digestion. Energy 135:352–360
Huang W, Wang Z, Guo Q, Wang H, Zhou Y, Ng WJ (2016) Pilot-scale landfill with leachate recirculation for enhanced stabilization. Biochem Eng J 105:437–445
Agdag ON, Sponza DT (2005) Effect of alkalinity on the performance of a simulated landfill bioreactor digesting organic solid wastes. Chemosphere 59:871–879
Bilgili MS, Demir A, Ozkaya B (2007) Influence of leachate recirculation on aerobic and anaerobic decomposition of solid wastes. J Hazard Mater 143:177–183
Bhambulkar AV (2011) Effect of leachate recirculation on landfill. Int J Adv Eng Sci Technol 11:286–291
Barampouti EMP, Mai ST, Vlyssides AG (2005) Dynamic modeling of the ratio volatile fatty acids/bicarbonate alkalinity in a UASB reactor for potato processing wastewater treatment. Environ Monit Assess 110:121–128
Vlissidis A, Zouboulis AI (1993) Thermophilic anaerobic digestion of alcohol distillery wastewaters. Bioresour Technol 43:131–140
Sanphoti N, Towprayoon S, Chaiprasert P, Nopharatana A (2006) The effects of leachate recirculation with supplemental water addition on methane production and waste decomposition in a simulated tropical landfill. J Environ Manage 81:27–35
Alkaabi S, Van Geel PJ, Warith MA (2009) Effect of saline water and sludge addition on biodegradation of municipal solid waste in bioreactor landfills. Waste Manag Res 27:59–69
Sandip TM (2013) Anaerobic bioreactor landfill for bio stabilisation and green renewable energy generation from municipal solid waste. A case study. Doctoral Thesis, University of Pune
Sandip TM, Kanchan CK, Ashok HB (2012) Enhancement of methane production and bio-stabilisation of municipal solid waste in anaerobic bioreactor landfill. Bioresour Technol 110:10–17
El-Fadel M, Findikakis AN, Leckie JO (1996) Estimating and enhancing methane yield from municipal solid waste. Hazard Waste Hazard Mater 13:309–331
He PJ, Qu X, Shao LM, Li GJ, Lee DJ (2007) Leachate pretreatment for enhancing organic matter conversion in landfill bioreactor. J Hazard Mater 142:288–296
Mansour AA, Motte A, Pallier V, Feuillade-Cathalifaud G, Ponthieux A (2012) Assessment of the aerobic preparation and bottom ash addition as pretreatment steps before landfilling: impact on methanogenesis kinetics and leachate parameters. Waste Manage 32:1864–1872
Valencia R, Van der Zon W, Woelders VDH, Lubberding HJ, Gijzen HJ (2009) The effect of hydraulic conditions on waste stabilisation in bioreactor landfill simulators. Bioresour Technol 100:1754–1761
Shi J, Qian X, Liu X, Sun L, Liao Z (2016) The behavior of compression and degradation for municipal solid waste and combined settlement calculation method. Waste Manage 55:154–164
Fei X, Zekkos D (2018) Coupled experimental assessment of physico-biochemical characteristics of municipal solid waste undergoing enhanced biodegradation. Géotechnique 68:1031–1043
Warith M (2002) Bioreactor landfills: experimental and field results. Waste Manage 22:7–17
Acknowledgements
The authors appreciate the financial support provided by Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India, in the form of INSPIRE Fellowship awarded to Anil Nain to carry out this research work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nain, A., Lohchab, R.K., Singh, K. et al. MSW stabilization in an anaerobic bioreactor landfill and evaluation of in-situ leachate treatment potential with the help of quadric model. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 23, 2192–2207 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-021-01287-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-021-01287-4