Abstract
Despite efforts to understand the factors that determine soil organic carbon (SOC) stocks in terrestrial ecosystems, there remains little information on how SOC turnover time varies among ecosystems, and how SOC turnover time and C input, via plant production, differentially contribute to regional patterns of SOC stocks. In this study, we determined SOC stocks (gC m−2) and used soil radiocarbon measurements to derive mean SOC turnover time (years) for 0–10 cm mineral soil at ten sites across North America that included arctic tundra, northern boreal, northern and southern hardwood, subtropical, and tropical forests, tallgrass and shortgrass prairie, mountain grassland, and desert. SOC turnover time ranged 36-fold among ecosystems, and was much longer for cold tundra and northern boreal forest and dry desert (1277–2151 years) compared to other warmer and wetter habitats (59–353 years). Two measures of C input, net aboveground production (NAP), determined from the literature, and a radiocarbon-derived measure of C flowing to the 0–10 cm mineral pool, I, were positively and SOC turnover time was negatively associated with mean annual evapotranspiration (ET) among ecosystems. The best fit model generated from the independent variables NAP, I, annual mean temperature and precipitation, ET, and clay content revealed that SOC stock was best explained by the single variable I. Overall, these findings indicate the primary role that C input and the secondary role that C stabilization play in determining SOC stocks at large regional spatial scales and highlight the large vulnerability of the global SOC pool to climate change.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The response of the global soil organic carbon (SOC) pool to increasing temperature and changing moisture regimes will play a major role in determining how terrestrial systems will respond to climate change (IPCC 2007). Factors that control the dynamics and size of the relatively small SOC pool that turns over within a few years have been extensively studied and are relatively well understood (for example, Nadelhoffer 1990; Hart and others 1994; Frank and Groffman 1998; Fissore and others 2008; Craine and others 2010). Considerably less is known about the dynamics of the much larger pool of SOC that turns over at decadal to millennial time scales (Trumbore 2009). Because the dynamics of this older SOC pool largely determines soil carbon (C) stocks of ecosystems and will predominately dictate the direction and strength of the terrestrial feedback on climate change, there is great interest in documenting these long time-scale SOC dynamics and understanding the factors that control the size of this relatively old soil C pool. Recently developed radiocarbon methods have been used to examine long time-scale SOC processes in temperate broadleaf and tropical forest, temperate cropland, and arctic tundra (for example, Trumbore and Harden 1997; Torn and others 1997; Paul and others 2001; Horwarth and others 2008; Trumbore 2009; Tipping and others 2010; Posada and Schuur 2011). However, we are unaware of a radiocarbon study that has compared pedologically similar soil C sampled at the same depth from a wide range of ecosystem types. Such a study would contribute to a general understanding of how SOC processes, particularly turnover time, vary among habitats and how SOC turnover rates contribute to regional-scale patterns of soil SOC stocks.
The SOC pool is primarily determined by the long-term difference between the C assimilated by plants and C lost in metabolism. At the regional scale, plant production is principally a function of climate (Rosenzweig 1968). The residence time of soil C varies widely according to four inter-related processes (Trumbore 2009): (1) climatic stabilization, which is a function of thermal energy and/or moisture control on decomposition (Meentemeyer 1978; Fissore and others 2008; Posada and Schuur 2011), (2) chemical stabilization (that is, recalcitrance) that influences resistance to decomposition (Krull and others 2006; Lützow and others 2006 2006), (3) physical stabilization, which is a result of a diverse array of physical associations between organic matter (OM) and clay surfaces and the inhibiting effects of soil particle aggregation on decomposition (Oades 1984; Jastrow 1996; Torn and others 1997; Baldock and Skjemstad 2000; Masiello and others 2004, Rasmussen and others 2005; Mikutta and others 2006), and (4) stabilization due to the size, composition, and spatial distribution of the decomposer community (Ekschmitt and others 2005; Briones and others 2010). Although considerable attention has been paid to different factors that control ecosystem C assimilation and the stabilization of SOC, we are unaware of any study that has explored the relative importance of C input versus soil C stability in controlling soil C stocks that have accumulated under a wide range of environmental conditions.
The overall goal of this study was to examine regional-scale controls on mineral SOC turnover times and stocks among arctic tundra, grassland, desert, and boreal, temperate, subtropical, and tropical forest ecosystems across North America. Soil C stocks and radiocarbon measurements were used to model SOC turnover times and calculate C input rates to the mineral soil C pool among habitats. We had two specific objectives. The first was to examine how SOC turnover time was associated with mean annual temperature (MAT), moisture (MAP), and evapotranspiration (ET), a climatically derived water budget variable, and soil clay content among ecosystem types. The second was to determine the relative contributions of SOC turnover time and C input in determining mineral soil SOC stocks among ecosystems across North America.
Material and Methods
Soil Collection
Soil was collected in ten different ecosystem types across North America and Puerto Rico in 2005 (Table 1) to determine SOC turnover times and stocks (gC m−2). The 0–10 cm depth interval of mineral soil was collected at each site. At two sites, where mineral soil was overlain by a well-developed organic layer (northern boreal forest, northern hardwood forest), the organic layer also was collected. An arctic tundra site (Toolik Lake) was an exception, where the top approximately 20 cm of organic soil was collected and separated into Oe (dark brown, fibrous) and Oa (black, well decomposed) horizons by color. Three replicate samples of soil were collected at each site using a soil corer, shovel, or trowel. Each of the replicate soil samples was examined separately, except at four of the sites (shortgrass plains, tallgrass prairie, subtropical hammock, southeastern hardwood forest), where samples were combined and measurements were made on the pooled sample.
Mineral soil samples were passed through a 2-mm sieve to remove coarse stones and large roots. Clumps of soil were broken apart to homogenize the samples as much as possible. The soil was then passed through a 250-μm sieve, which removed most of the remaining detectable root material. All remaining visible root fragments were removed from an approximately 200 cm3 subsample that was collected from the re-homogenized soil. Soil texture was determined on the subsample using standard methods (Elliot and others 1999) and bulk density measurements were obtained from the literature (see Table 1 for references). All visible roots were removed from the organic layers with forceps. Mineral soil and organic layer percent C was determined on a CE Instruments NC 2100 soil analyzer (CE Elantech Inc., Lakewood NJ, USA). Mineral SOC stock (gC m−2) was calculated by multiplying the proportion soil C by bulk density (g soil cm−3), then scaling up to 1 m2.
Soil Radiocarbon
∆14C (‰) measurements were made on a 1 g homogenized subsample of soil that had all visible root material removed under a dissecting scope. Soil organic radiocarbon values were derived as the deviation from a 1950 standard representing isotopic composition in 1950, prior to bomb-generated increases in atmospheric 14CO2, where
and where
The more positive the soil ∆14C value, the greater the proportion of the soil C was represented by bomb-produced 14C. Negative ∆14C values represented C that was predominantly comprised of C assimilated before 1950. A sample with a ∆14C equal to zero has the same isotopic composition as that of atmospheric CO2 in 1950. Radiocarbon values were corrected for (1) isotopic fractionation by adjusting ∆14C measurements to a common δ13C value of −25‰ and (2) radioactive decay of the standard after 1950. All samples were acid pretreated to remove mineral C and radiocarbon measurements were determined at the Arizona AMS Laboratory (Tuscon, AZ).
Stable C Turnover Rates
We calculated the turnover time (years) of the soil C pool among ecosystems with a soil C stock modeling approach described in detail elsewhere (Trumbore 1993; Torn and others 2005; Frank and others 2011). In brief, this method derived the historic record of ∆14C content of two soil C pools, active and stable, at an annual time step. We assumed steady state dynamics, so that the size of the two pools did not change over time, and that the ∆14C value of the C assimilated by plants was determined by the atmospheric ∆14C value of CO2 for that year (http://www.radiocarbon.org/IntCal04.htm; Levin and Kromer 2004; Graven 2008). The ∆14C value for C metabolized and lost from the stable pool was equal to the radiocarbon value of the C pool the previous year. For each pool, the C input and output equaled the C pool size divided by turnover time (years). The size of the active pool was set at 3% of the total SOC pool, similar to other studies (Parton and others 1987; Torn and others 2005; Frank and others 2011), and the ∆14C value of that pool was the atmospheric value for the previous year. (Varying the size of the labile pool from 1–5% was found not to change derived stable turnover rates by more than 5 years). The stable C pool (soil C–active C) and the turnover time of the active pool were known. To determine the turnover time of the stable pool, we found the value for stable C turnover time that resulted in the correct soil ∆14C value for the soil collected in 2005.
Other Site Measurements
We added a Greenland arctic site, for which 0–10 cm soil radiocarbon and soil property characteristics were known (Horwarth and others 2008; Czimczik and Welker 2010), to include arctic mineral soil in our analyses. Monthly temperature and precipitation values were gathered directly from webpages of LTER sites (arctic tundra[Toolik Lake], northern hardwood forest [Hubbard Brook], shortgrass plains [Shortgrass Steppe], tallgrass prairie [Konza Prairie], desert [Sevilleta], tropical forest [Luquillo Experimental Forest]) or records from municipal weather stations located 10–15 km (mountain grassland, southern hardwood forest, subtropical hammock), 30 km (northern boreal forest), or approximately 120 km (tundra [Thule]) from the site using the National Climatic Data Center climate records (http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/ncdc.html). Thirty- to 40-year records were used to calculate MAT and MAP for the sites; the length of the record depended on the length of the sequence of uninterrupted or nearly uninterrupted data (mean monthly values were used for rare missing values). The two exceptions were the Greenland arctic and southern hardwood forest sites, for which MAT and MAP values were calculated from 10-year nearly uninterrupted weather records. Monthly temperature and precipitation data were used to run a water-balance model (McCabe and Markstrom 2007) to generate mean ET rates at each site. This model estimated biologically available moisture accounting for precipitation and temperature regimes and the rooting depth and soil texture at each of the sites.
Annual net aboveground production (NAP) and soil bulk density values were obtained from the literature (see Table 1 for references). We derived I, the annual rate of C flowing to the 0–10 cm mineral soil C pool, using the steady state relationship, I = (sCS/t) + aCS, where sCS was the stable SOC pool (gC m−2), which equaled 0.97*SOC, t was the stable SOC pool turnover time (years), and aCS was the active SOC pool that turned over annually, which equaled 0.03 *SOC.
Statistical Analyses
Values for the two topographic positions in mountain grassland and tallgrass prairie were averaged to provide a single sample for each of the grassland types. Likelihood ratio tests (Burnham and Anderson 2002) were used to select the best bivariate linear or nonlinear relationship between pairs of several variables: MAT, MAP, ET, C turnover time, percent clay (for mineral soils only), and soil C stock. The one exception was the relationship of stable SOC turnover time with MAP. In this case, there was no significant difference between two and three parameter decay functions, which would have normally required the selection of the least complex, two-parameter model. We chose the more complex model, however, because the two-parameter model yielded unrealistic negative SOC turnover times for high MAP ecosystems.
We also built two separate models with the best combination of variables to describe soil C turnover times and SOC stocks. We performed these analyses on standardized data to better assess the relative importance of each independent parameter included in the models (Sokal and Rohlf 1995). We used the small sample Akaike information criterion (c-AIC) for model selection (Burnham and Anderson 2002). All statistical analyses were performed in R version 2.10.1.
Results
Mean ∆14C values and turnover rates of 0–10 cm mineral soil C varied widely among North American ecosystem types (Table 2). Stable SOC turnover times ranged from 59 years in subtropical hammock to 2151 years in Greenland high arctic tundra. For the three sites where more than a single soil layer was examined, the rate of SOC turnover declined with depth (Table 2). The period required for stable SOC turnover in the overlying organic soil layer was 895 and 233 years shorter than the mean turnover period for SOC in the 0–10 cm mineral soil at the northern boreal forest and northern hardwood forest, respectively. At the Toolik Lake arctic tundra site, the stable SOC turnover time for the surface Oe organic layer was 686 years shorter than the subsurface Oa organic layer (Table 2).
Stable SOC turnover time declined exponentially with the three climatic parameters, MAT, MAP, and ET (Figure 1A–C), indicating that the metabolic loss of SOC sped up among warmer and wetter climates. The relationships were predominantly or entirely determined by the much longer SOC turnover times for arctic tundra, northern boreal, and desert ecosystems that experienced extreme cold or dry conditions. Remarkably, SOC turnover times varied relatively little (59–353 years) among the remaining ecosystems that experienced a larger variation in climatic conditions. An exception to the relationships was that stable mineral SOC turnover time for desert soil was significantly longer than predicted by the SOC turnover–MAT relationship derived from other ecosystems (Figure 1A), due to extreme moisture limitation in that habitat. The qualitatively similar functions of SOC turnover with the three climatic variables, MAT, MAP, ET, was due to a positive correlation between MAT and MAP among ecosystems included in the study (r = 0.66, P = 0.036). SOC turnover also exponentially declined with clay content (Figure 1D); a counterintuitive result considering reports of clay stabilizing SOC (for example, Oades 1984; Mikutta and others 2006). However, the relationship between SOC turnover and clay content was due to both biological (that is, decomposition) and geochemical (that is, chemical weathering) processes increasing with warmer and wetter conditions. The partial correlation coefficient between SOC turnover and ASIN percent clay when the effect of ET was held constant was nonsignificant (r p = 0.22). Thus, when the effect of climate on the two processes was removed, SOC turnover was unrelated to soil clay content among our study sites. AIC comparisons of models including all permutations of the independent variables MAT, MAP, ET, and clay to describe stable C turnover time yielded a model with just the single variable ET.
The 0–10 cm mineral SOC stock (gC m−2) was exponentially related to NAP (Figure 2A). The exponential shape of the function was due to the relatively low soil C stocks for three low productive ecosystems, that is, desert, arctic, and shortgrass plains. There was a positive, quadratic relationship between SOC stock and the derived steady state rate of C flowing to the mineral C pool (I), based on C stock and turnover time measures (Figure 2B). The function reflected an increasing SOC pool as I increased, but a declining stabilization of C flowing to the mineral C pool among the most productive, warm, and moist ecosystems. There also was a weak, positive linear relationship between soil SOC stock and soil clay content (Figure 2C). SOC stock and stable SOC turnover time were negatively related (Figure 2D), indicating, a bit counterintuitively, that faster turnover of the large stable pool equivalent to 97% of SOC was associated with greater SOC stocks. The positive and negative associations of the two measures of C input (NAP, I) and SOC turnover with SOC stocks, respectively (Figure 2), was a function of both plant growth and SOC decomposition being primarily under climatic control. Comparisons of all permutations of functions describing the variation in SOC stocks among ecosystems from the pool of independent variables examined in this study (MAT, MAP, ET, clay content, NAP, I) revealed that the best fit model was the polynomial function with the single variable, I (Figure 2B).
Discussion
There were two principal goals of this study. The first was to determine the variation in stable SOC turnover time among a wide range of North American terrestrial ecosystems and environmental conditions. SOC turnover ranged by 36-fold (59–2151 years) among ecosystems, indicating the markedly different periods of time that assimilated C resided in the soil among terrestrial habitats. This large variation in stable SOC turnover time was closely associated with mean ET, an index of the biologically available moisture in a system. Previous studies have reported associations of ET with regional-level variation in NAP (Rosenzweig 1968; Sala and others 1988; Knapp and Smith 2001), also found in this study, and litter decomposition rate (Meentemeyer 1978). There appeared to be a threshold level of ET of about 300 mm, above which turnover was relatively unresponsive to ET and below which turnover time increased exponentially (Figure 1B). Qualitatively similar functions were found for the relationships of MAT and MAP with stable SOC turnover time. The phase change from liquid to ice that occurs at 0°C is a threshold at which microbial activity declines by several orders of magnitude (Monson and others 2006; Schuur and others 2008). This effect of ice formation on decomposition is likely responsible for the relatively steep increase in SOC turnover time below zero MAT (Figure 1A) among high northern latitude habitats. SOC turnover time exhibited an even steeper increase among sites receiving less than 330 mm precipitation in the relationship between SOC turnover time and MAP (Figure 1B), suggesting a particularly sharp moisture limitation threshold on SOC turnover that occurs in very dry habitat.
Although focusing on the properties of mineral SOC was the primary objective of this study, C turnover time also was measured for organic soil layers at three of the ecosystem sites. The shorter SOC turnover times for the organic layer versus mineral soil (northern hardwood, northern boreal forests) and the top versus bottom organic layer (Toolik arctic site) were likely due to the (1) deposition of recently assimilated, relatively labile C on the soil surface compared to lower layers that received older inputs from above, and (2) lack of physical stabilization forces between OM and clay surfaces in the organic layers. Turnover times for the organic layer C also were faster than the predicted mineral soil values when controlling for ambient temperate (Figure 1A). In contrast, organic layer SOC turnover times did not seem to differ from the functions describing relationships of mineral SOC turnover with MAP (Figure 1B) and ET (Figure 1C), suggesting that moisture limitation operated on the decomposition of labile (organic layer) and more stable (mineral soil) C in the same manner.
The second goal of this study was to examine factors associated with 0–10 cm mineral SOC stocks. Previous meta-analyses of global datasets have found that SOC stocks increased with MAP and clay content and declined with MAT (Post and others 1982; Jobbágy and Jackson 2000). One difference between previous studies and this one is that we also were able to examine how SOC stocks were associated with the flow of C directly into the mineral SOC pool (I) versus factors such as harsh climatic conditions and soil clay content that can stabilize SOC. We found that differences in SOC stocks at this very large continental scale were best described by a model that included the single variable, C input (I), which explained 97% of the variation in SOC stocks among ecosystems. Lengthening the SOC turnover time, that is, increasing stabilization, would be expected to increase SOC stocks. However, we found that SOC stock declined with increasing stabilization among the widely variable ecosystems we examined (Figure 2D). This latter rather counterintuitive finding was due to the opposite effects that ET had on C input versus SOC turnover, increasing the former and reducing the latter. The positive relationship between SOC stock and I (Figure 2B) reflects warmer and wetter climatic conditions increasing I more than they reduce SOC stabilization.
We found that the derived annual C input (I) was much lower than annual NAP. If one assumes that 55% of aboveground tissue is C (Sterner and Elser 2002), C input to the 0–10 cm mineral soil (I) averaged only 54% (SE 38%) of the C in NAP (CNAP) among ecosystems. Considering that CNAP does not include root C that also flows to the mineral soil C pool, the actual percentage of the relevant pool of plant-assimilated C that makes its way via leaf and root pathways to the mineral soil is markedly less than 54%. Such results indicate the importance of herbivory and leaf and root litter decomposition, in addition to plant production, in determining the flow of C to the soil and the size of SOC stocks.
Clay was defined in this study on the basis of particle size and, given the wide range of climatic conditions and thus chemical weathering conditions, the study systems included a diverse array of morphological types of clay. Weathered clays usually have a plate morphology and can render OM unavailable when organic material penetrates the pores between stacks of plates and forms bonds with the negatively charged mineral surfaces (Oades 1988). The stabilizing effects of secondary minerals on SOC stabilization has been demonstrated in a number of studies. In controlled laboratory experiments, slower decomposition has been observed in soils with higher clay content (Ladd and others 1977, 1981) and for OM associated with mineral surfaces (Miltner and Zech 1998; Van Hees and others 2003; Kalbitz and others 2005; Mikutta and others 2006). In addition, field studies have found the amount and the mineral properties of a weathered clay (for example, the crystalline phase) (Torn and others 1997; Masiello and others 2004; Kleber and others 2005) can influence SOC sequestration. In northern latitude habitats included in this study, clay particles likely were represented by finely ground primary minerals, and thus likely had negligible effects on SOC stabilization. The combination of the relatively unweathered clay material in arctic tundra and northern boreal forest and the low amount of clay in the arctic (8%) and desert (9%) soils suggests that the very long SOC turnover times for those three habitats (Table 2) were not due to clays stabilizing SOC, but instead a function of climatic SOC stabilization.
Global warming is expected to increase the net flow of soil-stored SOC to the atmosphere. The response of high latitude soils to climate change has received considerable attention because of the relatively large 7–8°C increase in MAT forecasted for high latitudes by the end of the twenty-first century (IPCC 2007) and the large vulnerable pool of C stored in permafrost soil, estimated to be as much as 50% of terrestrial C (Schuur and others 2008; Tarnocai and others 2009). Using the function between stable SOC turnover time and MAT of Figure 1A, an 8°C increase for arctic tundra from −10 to −2°C would result in mean stable SOC turnover time declining from 1969 to 863 years. It is still unclear how increasing thermal energy will differentially influence OM that ranges in age and recalcitrance (Briones 2009). However, there is some empirical evidence that climatic warming may stimulate decomposition of recalcitrant SOC more than labile SOC (Frierer and others 2005; Conant and others 2008). If correct, warming would result in a marked increase in stable SOC turnover rates, particularly across high latitude habitats that possesses old C that has been up to now stabilized by extreme cold conditions. Of course, the resulting SOC stock for a habitat will not be singularly determined by the effects of increasing temperatures on decomposition, but also on the influence that climate warming will have on ecosystem production (Luo and others 2011). A recent lowering of Alaskan forest production due to warmer and drier conditions (Beck and others 2011) suggests that climate change is also reducing C input among northern ecosystems. Thus, global climate change may have a two-pronged effect on SOC stocks at northern latitudes by reducing C inputs and releasing old, previously stabilized SOC.
We can think of three important caveats for interpreting the results of this study. First, we only examined the SOC down to 10 cm in the soil. Although that SOC pool receives all of the aboveground C and is an interval that supports dense root growth and turnover in the majority of habitat types (Nadelhoffer and Raich 1992), most SOC is found below 10 cm among ecosystems, with properties differing markedly from surface OM (Jobbágy and Jackson 2000). Consequently, further work is required to determine how closely the results of this study for 0–10 cm mineral SOC may reflect the dynamics of deeper and whole-soil C. Second, turnover times and C inputs reported here were derived for steady state conditions. Modeling studies suggest that even in harsh climates, SOC stocks will reach equilibrium during primary succession within 2000 years (Horwarth and others 2008). Nevertheless, it is unclear how fire (Thonicke and others 2008), forest harvesting practices (Whittaker and others 1974), fluctuating grazing at the grassland sites (Houston 1982; Knapp and others 1998; Hart and Ashby 1998), and recent disruption in climate may have produced nonequilibrium dynamics and confounded our analyses. Third, the relationships of stable SOC turnover time and 0–10 cm mineral SOC stocks with environmental conditions and C input estimates were derived from a single sample per habitat type. Clearly, additional samples will be required to flesh out the variation around these climatically driven regional-scale relationships.
The results of this study include several important conclusions. Variation in C residence time in the top 10 cm of mineral soil ranges by as much as 36-fold and is largely a function of climatic stabilization that occurs in extreme cold and dry habitats. SOC stocks were best explained by C inputs, and not by the stabilization of soil C among ecosystems across North America. These findings indicating how climate plays the preeminent role in controlling SOC stocks, by determining both C inputs, through controlling plant production, and stabilization, through inhibiting decomposition in harsh climates, highlight the probable large changes in SOC dynamics and stocks that will occur in response to climate change.
References
Baldock JA, Skjemstad JO. 2000. Role of the soil matrix and minerals in protecting natural organic materials against biological attack. Org Geochem 31:697–710.
Bohlen PJ, Groffman PM, Driscoll CT, Fahey TJ, Siccama TG. 2001. Plant–soil–microbial interactions in a northern hardwood forest. Ecology 82:965–78.
Briones MJI. 2009. Uncertainies related to the temperature sensitivity of soil carbon decomposition. In: Baveye PC, Laba M, Mysiak J, Eds. Uncertainties in environmental modeling and consequences for Policy Making. New York: Springer. p 317–34.
Briones MJI, Garnett MH, Ineson P. 2010. Soil biology and warming play a key role in the release of ‘old C’ from organic soils. Soil Biol Biochem 42:960–7.
Burnham KP, Anderson DR. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inference. A practical information-theoretic approach. New York: Springer Science+Media.
Conant RT, Steinweg JM, Haddix ML, Paul EA, Plante AF, Six J. 2008. Experimental warming shows that decomposition temperature sensitivity increases with organic matter recalcitrance. Ecology 89:2384–91.
Craine J, Spurr R, McLauchlan K, Fierer N. 2010. Landscape-level variation in temperature sensitivity of soil organic carbon decomposition. Soil Biol Biochem 42:373–5.
Czimczik CI, Welker JM. 2010. Radiocarbon content of CO2 respired from high arctic tundra in Northwest Greenland. Arctic Antarctic Alpine Res 42:342–50.
Ekschmitt K, Liu M, Vetter S, Fox O, Wolters V. 2005. Strategies used by soil biota to overcome soil organic matter stability—why is dead matter left over in the soil? Geoderma 128:167–76.
Elliot ET, Heil JW, Kelly EF, Monger HC. 1999. Soil structure and other physical properties. In: Robertson GP, Coleman DC, Bledsoe CS, Sollins P, Eds. Standard soil methods for long-term ecological research. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p 74–88.
Fissore C, Giardina CP, Kolka RK, Trettin CC, King GM, Jurgensen MF, Barton CD, McDowell SD. 2008. Temperature and vegetation effects on soil organic matter along a forested mean annual temperature gradient in North America. Glob Change Biol 14:193–205.
Frank DA. 2007. Drought effects on above and below ground production of a grazedtemperate grassland ecosystem. Oecologia 152:131–9.
Frank DA, Groffman PM. 1998. Ungulate vs. landscape control of soil C and N processes in grasslands of Yellowstone National Park. Ecology 79:2229–41.
Frank DA, DePriest T, McLauchlan. 2011. Topographic and ungulate regulation of soil C turnover in a temperate grassland ecosystem. Glob Change Biol 17:495–504.
Graven H. 2008. Advancing the use of radiocarbon in studies of global and regional carbon cycling with high precision measurements of 14C in CO2 from the Scripps CO2 Program. Scripps Institute of Oceanography. San Diego: University of California.
Hart RH, Ashby MM. 1998. Grazing intensities, vegetation, and heifer gains: 55 years on shortgrass. J Range Manag 51:392–8.
Hart SC, Nason GE, Myrold DD, Perry DA. 1994. Dynamics of gross transformations in an old-growth forest: the carbon connection. Ecology 75:880–91.
Horwarth JL, Sletten RS, Hagedorn B, Hallet B. 2008. Spatial and temporal distribution of soil organic carbon in nonsorted striped patterned ground of the high arctic. J Geophys Res 113:G03S07. doi:10.1029/2007JG000511.
Houston DB. 1982. The northern Yellowstone elk: ecology and management. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.
IPCC. 2007. Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL, Eds. Contribution of working group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge Univ Press.
Jastrow JD. 1996. Soil aggregate formation and the accrual of particulate and mineral-associated organic matter. Soil Biol Biochem 28:665–76.
Jobbágy EG, Jackson RB. 2000. The vertical distribution of soil organic carbon and its relation to climate and vegetation. Ecol Appl 10:423–36.
Johnston MH. 1992. Soil-vegetation relationships in a tabonuco forest community in the Luquillo Mountains of Puerto Rico. J Trop Ecol 8:253–63.
Kalbitz K, Schwesig D, Rethemeyer J, Matzner E. 2005. Stabilization of dissolved organic matter by sorption to the mineral soil. Soil Biol Biochem 37:1319–31.
Kieft TL, White CS, Loftin SR, Aguilar R, Craig JA, Skaar DA. 1998. Temporal dynamics in soil carbon and nitrogen resources at a grassland-shrublandecotone. Ecology 79:671–83.
Kleber M, Mikutta R, Torn MS, Jahn R. 2005. Poorly crystalline mineral phases protect organic matter in acid subsoil horizons. Eur J Soil Sci 56:717–25.
Knapp AK, Briggs JM, Hartnett DC, Collins SL. 1998. Grassland dynamics: long-term ecological research in tallgrass prairie. New York: Oxford University Press.
Knapp AK, Smith MD. 2001. Variation among biomes in temporal dynamics of aboveground primary production. Science 291:481–4.
Krull ES, Bestland EA, Skjemstad JO, Parr JF. 2006. Geochemistry (delta C-13, delta N-15, C-13 NMR) and residence times (C-14 and OSL) of soil organic matter from red-brown earths of South Australia: implications for soil genesis. Geoderma 132:344–60.
Ladd JN, Oades JM, Amato M. 1981. Microbial biomass formed from 14C-, 15-labelled plant material decomposing in soils in the field. Soil Biol Biochem 13:119–26.
Ladd JN, Parsons JW, Amato M. 1977. Studies of nitrogen immobilization and mineralization in calcareous soils. II. Mineralization of immobilized nitrogen from soil fractions of different particle size and density. Soil Biol Biochem 9:319–25.
Levin I, Kromer B. 2004. The tropospheric 14CO2 level in mid-latitudes of the northern hemisphere (1959–2003). Radiocarbon 46:1261–72.
Lützow Mv, Kögel-Knaber I, Erkschmitt K, Matzner E, Guggenberger G, Marschner B, Flessa H. 2006. Stabilization of organic matter in temperate soils: mechanisms and their relevence under different soil conditions—a review. Eur J Soil Sci 57:426–45.
Masiello CA, Chadwick OA, Southon J, Torn MS,Harden JW. 2004. Weathering controls on mechanisms of carbon storage in grassland soils. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 18. doi:10.1029/2004GB002219.
McCabe GJ, Markstrom SL. 2007. A monthly water-balance model driven by a graphical user interface. US Geological Survey Open-file report 2007-1088.
Meentemeyer V. 1978. Macroclimate and lignin control of decomposition. Ecology 59:465–72.
Mikutta R, Kleber M, Torn M, Jahn R. 2006. Stabilization of soil organic matter: association with minerals or chemical recalcitrance? Biogeochemistry 77:25–56.
Miltner A, Zech W. 1998. Beech leaf litter lignin degradation and transformation as influenced by mineral phases. Org Geochem 28:457–63.
Monson RK, Lipson DL, Burns SP, Turnipseed AA, Delany AC, Williams MW, Schmidt SK. 2006. Winter forest soil respiration controlled by climate and microbial community composition. Nature 439:711–14.
Muldavin EH, Moore DI, Collins SL, Wetherill KR, Lightfoot DC. 2008. Aboveground net primary production dynamics in a northern Chihuahuan Desert ecosystem. Oecologia 155:123–32.
Nadelhoffer KJ. 1990. Microlysimeter for measuring nitrogen mineralization and microbial respiration in aerobic soil incubations. Soil Sci Soc Am J 54:411–15.
Nadelhoffer KJ, Raich JW. 1992. Fine root production estimates and belowground carbon allocation in forest ecosystems. Ecology 73:1139–47.
Oades JM. 1984. Soil organic-matter and structural stability—mechanisms and implications for management. Plant Soil 76:319–37.
Oades JM. 1988. The retention of organic matter in soils. Biogeochemistry 5:35–70.
Parton W, Schimel DS, Cole CV, Ojima DS. 1987. Analysis of factors controlling soil organic matter levels in Great Plains grasslands. Soil Sci Soc Am J 51:1173–9.
Paul EA, Collins HP, Leavitt SW. 2001. Dynamics of resistant soil carbon of Midwestern agricultural soils measured by naturally occurring 14C abundance. Geoderma 104:239–56.
Posada JM, Schuur EAG. 2011. Relationships among precipitation regime, nutrient availability, and carbon turnover in tropical rain forests. Oecologia 165:783–95.
Post WM, Emanuel WR, Zinke PJ, Stangenberger AG. 1982. Soil carbon pools and world life zones. Nature 298:156–9.
Ruess RW, Hendrick RL, Burton AJ, Pregitzer KS, Sveinbjornssön B, Allen MF, Maurer GE. 2003. Coupling fine root dynamics with ecosystem carbon cycling in black spruce forests of interior Alaska. Ecol Monogr 73:643–62.
Rasmussen C, Torn MA, Southard RJ. 2005. Mineral assemblages and aggregates control carbon dynamics in a California conifer forest. Soil Sci Soc Am J 69:1711–21.
Rosenzweig ML. 1968. Net primary productivity of terrestrial communities: prediction from climatological data. Am Nat 102:67–74.
Sala OE, Parton WJ, Joyce LA, Lauenroth WK. 1988. Primary production of the central grassland region of the United States. Ecology 69:40–5.
Sanford RL, Parton WJ, Ojima DS, Lodge DJ. 1991. Hurricane effects on soil organic matter dynamics and forest production in the Luquillo experimental forest, Puerto Rico: results of simulation modeling. Biotropica 23:364–72.
Schuur EAG, Bockheim J, Canadell JG, Euskirchen E, Field CB, Goryachkin SV, Hagemann S, Kuhry P, Lafleur PM, Lee H, Mazhitova G, Nelson FE, Rinke A, Romanovsky VE, Shiklomanov N, Tarnocai C, Venevsky S, Vogel JG, Zimov SA. 2008. Vulnerability of permafrost carbon to climate change: implications for the global carbon cycle. Bioscience 58:701–14.
Schmalzer PA, Hinkle CR. 1996. Biomass and nutrients in aboveground vegetation and soils of Florida Oak-Saw Palmetto scrub. Castanea 61:168–93.
Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. 1995. Biometry. New York: WH Freeman and Company.
Sterner RW, Elser JJ. 2002. Ecological stoichiometry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Thonicke K, Venevsky S, Sitch S, Cramer W. 2008. The role of fire disturbance for global vegetation dynamics: coupling fire into dynamic global vegetation model. Glob Ecol 10:661–77.
Tipping E, Chamberlain PM, Bryant CL, Buckingham S. 2010. Soil organic matter turnover in British deciduous woodlands, quantified with radiocarbon. Geoderma 155:10–18.
Torn MS, Trumbore SE, Chadwick OA, Vitousek PM, Hendricks DM. 1997. Mineral control of soil organic carbon storage and turnover. Nature 389:170–3.
Torn MS, Vitousek PM, Trumbore SE. 2005. The influence of nutrient availability on soil organic matter turnover estimated by incubations and radiocarbon modeling. Ecosystems 8:352–72.
Trumbore SE. 1993. Comparison of the carbon dynamics in tropical and temperate soils using radiocarbon measurements. Global Biogeo Cycles 7:275–290.
Trumbore SE. 2000. Age of soil organic matter and soil respiration: radiocarbon constraints on belowground C dynamics. Ecol Appl 10:399–411.
Trumbore S. 2009. Radiocarbon and soil carbon dynamics. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 37:47–66.
Trumbore SE, Harden JW. 1997. Accumulation and turnover of carbon in organic and mineral soils of the BOREAS northern study area. J Geophys Res 102:28817–30.
Van Hees PAW, Vinogradoff SI, Edwards AC, Godbold DL, Jones DL. 2003. Low molecular weight organic acid adsorption in forest soils: effects on soil solution concentrations and biodegradation rates. Soil Biol Biochem 35:1015–26.
Whittaker RH. 1966. Forest dimensions and production in the Great Smoky Mountains. Ecology 47:103–21.
Whittaker RH, Bormann FH, Likens GE, Siccama TG. 1974. The Hubbard Brook ecosystem study: forest biomass and production. Ecol Monogr 44:233–54.
Wang H, Hall CAS, Cornell JD, Hall MHP. 2002. Spatial dependence and the relationship of soil organic carbon and soil moisture in the Luquillo experimental forest, Puerto Rico. Landsc Ecol 17:671–84.
Wein RW, Rencz AN. 1976. Plant cover and standing crop sampling procedures for the Canadian high arctic. Arctic Alpine Res 8:139–50.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank J. Blair, P. Bohlen, S. Collins, J. Fridley, P. Groffman, M. Harner, B. Laurenroth, L. Martel, R. Ruess, and Jess Zimmerman for help collecting the soils. C. Johnson provided helpful comments on an early draft. This research was funded by NSF Grant DEB-0318716.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Author contributions
DAF designed the study, DAF and AWP performed the research, DAF and KJM analyzed the data, DAF and KJM wrote the paper.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Frank, D.A., Pontes, A.W. & McFarlane, K.J. Controls on Soil Organic Carbon Stocks and Turnover Among North American Ecosystems. Ecosystems 15, 604–615 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-012-9534-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-012-9534-2