Abstract
Background
Cancer-associated hypercalcemia (CAH) is the most frequent metabolic disorder in cancer patients. We retrospectively reviewed the outcome and prognostic factors for patients with CAH being treated with standard intravenous disphosphonates.
Materials and methods
Two hundred sixty patients were reviewed. Overall survival and prognostic factors were analyzed. Relative risks (RR) for early death (within 60 days) were assessed (Fischer exact test and logistic regression model).
Results
Median survival was 64 days (range, 12–1,955+). Multivariate analysis identified the following factors as poor survival predictors: serum corrected calcium >2.83 mmol/l [hazard ratio (HR) = HR 2.21], albuminemia <35.5 (HR 2.41), squamous cell carcinoma (HR 2.64), bone metastasis (HR 1.44), and liver metastasis (HR 2..22). One hundred twenty-one patients died within 60 days. For those patients, the logistic regression model identified four independent predicting factors for early death: calcemia >2.83 mmol/l (RR 5.07), hypoalbuminemia (RR 7.42), liver metastasis (RR 4.34), and squamous cell carcinomas (RR 2.21).
Discussion
Despite intravenous diphosphonate, CAH is still associated with poor outcome. Simple bedside parameters may estimate the risk of early deaths.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Hypercalcemia, defined as serum calcium superior to 2.60 mmol/l, is the most common metabolic disorder in patients with cancer [1–2]. Its incidence is estimated between 10 and 20% of all patients with cancer [1, 2]. Cancer-associated hypercalcemia (CAH) is either related to the paraneoplastic production of osteoclast-activating factor by cancer cells (humoral mediated hypercalcemia) or to the large direct osteoclastosis induced by cancer cells (local osteolytic hypercalcemia) [1].
The current management of CAH includes intravenous hydratation and infusion of diphosphonates [3–5]. Diphosphonates are effective inhibitors of osteoclastic activity and bind to calcified matrices, preventing the attachment of osteoclastic precursors to the bone surface, being internalized selectively by bone-resorbing osteoclasts and consequently inhibiting osteoclast functions. Their molecular and cellular mechanisms of action are multiple, complex, and may include direct anti-tumoral based on apoptosis induction. [3–5].
The prognosis of CAH is very poor with a median survival ranging from 30 to 90 days for all primary sites, as reported in studies carried out before the widespread advent of diphosphonates [7, 8]. Despite its clinical efficacy, that is, normalization of serum calcium obtained in 40 to 100% patients with CAH [3–6], normalization of serum calcium observed within 4 days [3–6], and median duration of serum calcium normalization ranged between 11 to 48 days [3–6], the impact of pamidronate on overall survival is not clearly established [6, 9, 10].
The aim of this retrospective study was to characterize the factors that predict survival after a first episode of a CAH treated by intravenous disphosphonates. This study evaluates the prognostic value of variables easily obtained at patient bedside the day of diagnosis of CAH.
Materials and methods
Patients
Two hundred sixty consecutive patients treated at the Centre Oscar Lambret (Northern France Cancer Center) were reviewed. Inclusion criteria were (1) biopsy-proven solid tumors, (2) first episode of hypercalcemia, (3) hypercalcemia defined by serum albumin-corrected calcium above 2.60 mmol/l [11], and (4) treatment by intravenous diphosphonates. The calculation of albumin-corrected calcemia is based on the following rule: albumin-corrected calcemia = calcemia + [0.02 × (40, albuminemia in g/l)].
For each case, we recorded age, sex of patient, primary site of disease, histology type, time between cancer diagnosis and first hypercalcemia episode, presence of visceral metastases in the most recent evaluation of cancer extension (bone, liver, lung, and brain), biological parameters (serum calcium, albumin, serum albumin-corrected calcium, and urea), need of hospitalization for treatment, and treatment with calcitonin.
This study was approved by the French “Commission Nationale Informatique et Libertés (CNIL, date of approval June 2005).
Statistical analyses
Population was described with median and extreme values for continuous variables and percentages with 95% confidence intervals for categorical variables.
Time to events was calculated from the day of the first hypercalcemia episode. The survival was assessed with the Kaplan–Meier method [12]. The influence of categorical variables on survival was investigated with the log-rank for univariate analysis [13] and then with a Cox proportional hazards model for multivariate analysis [14]. Only variables with p value < 0.15 were selected for the multivariate analysis [14]. With those independent variables, we built a score aimed to predict early death, defined as death which occurred within the 60 days after the date of hypercalcemia episode.
Finally, we identified the variables that predicted early deaths by comparing patients’ and disease’s characteristics in patients with and without early death. The univariate analysis was based on the Fischer exact test and the multivariate analysis on a stepwise logistic regression model. In all cases, a p value inferior to 5% was considered as significant. Statistical analyses were carried out with SPSS, software, version 14.
Results
Patient data
There were 138 men and 122 women, aged from 2 to 91 years (median 56 years). Details of primaries and histological subtypes are shown Table 1. Metastases were seen in bone, liver, lung, and brain in 86 (33.0%), 66 (25.3%), 61 (23.4%), and 12 cases (4.6%), respectively. The median time interval between the diagnosis of cancer and occurrence of the first hypercalcemia episode was 3 months (range, 1–312). The median serum albumin-corrected calcium was 2.83 mmol/l (range, 2.61–4.56). Intravenous disphosphonates that have been used were pamidronate (n = 230, 88.5%), clodronate (n = 18, 6.9%), and zoledronate (n = 12, 4.6%). Thirteen (5.0%) patients required calcitonin injections. Most of the patients (n = 155, 59.6%) were inpatients.
Survival data
The median survival time of the entire cohort was 64 days (range, 12–1,955+). The following variables were found to be poor prognostic factors in univariate analysis: hypercalcemia occurring within the four first months after cancer diagnosis, male gender, serum albumin-corrected calcium over to 2.83 mmol/l, hypoalbuminemia, increased urea, head and neck cancers, squamous cell carcinomas, bone metastasis, liver metastasis, lung metastasis, brain metastasis, inpatients, and treatment with calcitonin injections (Table 2). In multivariate analysis, five independent variables remained significant: serum albumin-corrected calcium over to 2.83 mmol/l (p = 0.007), hypoalbuminemia (p = 0.001), squamous cell carcinomas (p = 0.0001), bone metastasis (p = 0.013), and liver metastasis (p = 0.009) (Table 3).
One hundred twenty one patients (46.3%) died within the 60 days after the first hypercalcemia episode. In univariate analysis, the following variables were found predictive for early death: hypercalcemia episode present at the time of cancer diagnosis, male gender, hypoalbuminemia, urea superior to 7.1 mmol/l, albumin-corrected calcemia superior to 2.83 mmol/l, head and neck cancers, squamous cell carcinomas, bone metastasis, liver metastasis, hospitalization required, and treatment with calcitonin injections. The final logistic regression model identified four independent predictive factors for early deaths: hypoalbuminemia, serum albumin-corrected-calcium over to 2.83 mmol/l presence of liver metastasis and squamous cell carcinomas (Table 4). Then, based on our multivariate analysis, we built a score aimed to predict early death (Table 5). The patients were classified according to four independent predicting factors: score = 0 (absence of predicting factor), score = 1 (presence of one predicting factors), and score = 2 (presence of two or more predicting factor). Median survival time of patients with scores 1, 2, and 3 were 1,153, 213, and 19 days, respectively (p = 0.001 with log-rank test; Fig. 1).
Discussion
Despite an adequate intravenous fluids hydratation and intravenous diphosphonate therapy, life expectancy of patients presenting a first episode of a CAH remains poor, with a median survival of 64 days in our series. This is in the range of what it has been published before the era of diphosphonates, when the median survival of CAH ranged from 30 to 90 days [2, 7, 8, 15–17]. There is no clear evidence that diphosphonate therapy improves outcome after CAH. Historical comparisons did no show any significant difference in survival between the survival curves of patients that have been treated with diphosphonates and those not have been treated with disphosphonates [10]. Surprisingly, overall survival was not reported in the largest randomized study, which has challenged the role of two diphosphonates [6]. Randomized comparisons of diphosphonates to placebo dealing with survival issues are lacking and will not be conducted due to their obvious unethical nature. Because alternative therapies such as gallium nitrate may be available [9], it could be worth to detect subgroups of patients who will not benefit from front-line diphosphonates. On the other hand, a modest and transient decrease in calcium level induced by diphosphonates may result in a clinical improvement of cognition disorders and, overall, a benefit in quality of life, which has to be taken into account in the medical decision making process.
The present multivariate analysis identified the following factors as predictors of poor survival: serum-corrected calcium >2.83 mmol/l, albuminemia <35 g/l, squamous cell cancer type, and presence of liver or bone metastases. To our knowledge, our study is the largest one ever published on factors, which may predict survival of patients with CAH treated by intravenous disphosphonates (Table 6). The most potent predictive factor of shorter survival is the squamous cell nature of the primary. Patients with squamous cell tumors have a much shorter median survival (45 days) than patients with other histological subtypes (147 days). The particular poor prognostic of CAH associated with head and neck cancers has been consistently reported previously [9, 16, 18]. Actually, Cvitkovic et al. [9] have reported that pamidronate therapy was far less efficient in treating CAH episodes associated with squamous cell carcinomas than those associated with other histological subtypes. These findings may be explained by differences in terms of CAH mechanisms. In fact, CAH associated with squamous cell tumors of head and neck, esophagus, and lung is mainly related to abnormal parathyroid hormone related protein (PTHrp) tumor secretion [19, 20]. Moreover, there are several reports that suggest that diphosphonates, in general, and pamidronate, in particular, are less efficient when CAH is caused by PTHrp secretion [21–23]. The poor influence on survival of visceral metastases has been previously reported [2, 10, 24, 25], as well as high serum calcium levels [10, 25].
In our series, the absence of normalization of serum calcium has been confirmed as a poor prognostic factor, with a median survival of 26 days (2–31) for the 15 patients who did not respond to diphosphonate therapy. As this factor was not obtained at baseline but few days latter, we did not introduced it in our multivariate model.
To better select patients undergoing exclusive palliative care without chemotherapy in everyday practice, Auguston et al. [26] have recently introduced the concept of “early death.” The key idea is to identify patients with very poor outcome, which may be considered for exclusive palliative care. Whereas Auguston et al. [26] focused their research on patients with multiple myeloma and found that older patients, those with increased level of beta2-microglobulin and those with poor performance status did have increased odds of early death, we found that hypoalbuminemia, serum albumin-corrected calcium superior to 2.83 mmol/l, liver metastasis, and squamous cell tumors were independent predictors of early death (Table 4). Moreover, we have built a simple bedside predictive model aimed to identify these patients with very poor outcome. As an example, the presence of two or more of the four predicting factors that have been selected after a stepwise regression procedure was able to predict a very short median survival (19 days; Fig. 1). For those patients, there is no doubt that palliative care must be considered.
The present study presents several limitations due to its retrospective nature. The mechanism of hypercalcemia was not explored and the non-cancer causes such as primary hyperparathyroidism were not systematically excluded. Our patients were not systematically considered for new evaluations of the cancer extension, especially new bone scan, which makes the presence or absence of bone metastases stated on the most recent evaluation.
Our study confirms the poor prognostic of patients with CAH, although they have been treated by adequate disphosphonate therapy, and allows us to identify poor prognostic factors. Obviously, retrospective analyses are exploratory and serve to suggest testable hypotheses. In our case, the clinical use of the prognostic model we built depends on the results of an ongoing prospective validation with biological exploration of CAH mechanisms that we have launched.
References
Besarb A, Caro JF (1978) Mechanisms of hypercalcemia in malignancy. Cancer 41:2276–2285
Brada M, Rowley M, Grant DJ, Ashley S, Powles TJ (1990) Hypercalcemia in patients with disseminated breast cancer. Acta Oncol 29:577–580
Body JJ, Borkowski A, Cleeren A et al (1986) Treatment of malignancy-associated hypercalcemia with intravenous aminohydroxypropylidene diphosphonate. J Clin Oncol 4:1177–1183
Nussbaum SR, Younger J, Vandepol CJ et al (1993) Single-dose intravenous therapy with pamidronate for the treatment of hypercalcemia of malignancy: comparison of 30-, 60-, and 90-mg dosages. Am J Med 95:297–304
Rogers MJ, Gordon S, Benford HL et al (2000) Cellular and molecular mechanisms of action of biphosphonates. Cancer 88:2961–2978
Major P, Lhortolary A, Hon J et al (2001) Zoledronic acid is superior to pamidronate in the treatment of hypercalcemia of malignancy a pooled analysis of two-randomized controlled clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 19:558–567
Monno S, Nagata A, Furuta S (1987) Hypercalcemia of cancer in the aerodigestive tract. J Clin Gastroenterol 9:78–82
Ralston SH, Gallacher SJ, Patel U, Campbell J, Boyle IT (1990) Cancer-associated hypercalcemia morbidity and mortality. Clinical experience in 126 treated patients. Ann Intern Med 112:499–504
Cvitkovic F, Armand JP, Tubiana-Hulin M, Rossi JF, Warrell RP Jr (2006) Randomized, double-blind, phase II trial of gallium nitrate compared with pamidronate for acute control of cancer-related hypercalcemia. Cancer J 12:47–53
Kristensen B, Ejlersten B, Mouridsen HT, Loft H (1998) Survival in breast cancer patients after the first episode of hypercalcemia. J Intern Med 244:189–198
Payne RB, Carver ME, Morgan DB (1979) Interpretation of serum total calcium effects of adjustment for albumin concentration on frequency of abnormal values and on detection of change in the individual. J Clin Pathol 32:56–60
Kaplan EL, Meier P (1958) Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations. J Am Stat Assoc 53:457–481
Mantel N (1966) Estimation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration. Cancer Chemother Rep 50:163–170
Cox D (1972) Regression models and life tables (with discussion). J R Stat Soc B 34:187–220
Chasan SA, Pothel LR, Huben RP (1989) Management and prognostic significance of hypercalcemia in renal cell carcinomas. J Urology 33:167–170
Degardin M, N’Guyen M, Beaurin D et al (1995) Hypercalcémie et carcinomes épidermoides des voies aéro-digestives supérieures. Incidence et pronostic. Bull Cancer 82:975–980
Fahn HJ, Lee YH, Chen MT, Huang JK, Chen KK, Chang LS (1991) The incidence and prognostic significance of humoral hypercalcemia in renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 145:248–250
Penel N Berthon C, Everard F et al (2005) Prognosis of hypercalcemia in aerodigestive tract cancers Study of 136 recent cases. Oral Oncology 41:884–889
Wysolmerski JJ, Broadus AE (1994) Hypercalcemia of malignancy: the central role of parathyroid hormone related protein. Ann Rev Med 45:189–200
Skrabanek P, Mc Partlin J, Powell D (1980) Tumor hypercalcemia and “ectopic” hyperparathyroidism”. Medicine 59:262–282
Wimalawansa SJ (1994) Significance of plasma PTH-rp in patients with hypercalcemia of malignancy treated. with diphosphonate. Cancer 73:2223–2230
Walls J, Ratcliffe WA, Howell A, Bundred NJ (1994) Response to intravenous biphosphonate therapy in hypercalcemic patients without bone metastases: the role of parathyroid hormone-related protein. Br J Cancer 70:169–172
Gurney H, Grill V, Martin TJ (1993) Parathyroid hormone-related protein and response to pamidronate in tumour-induced hypercalcemia. Lancet 341:1611–1613
De Wits S, Cleton FJ (1994) Hypercalcemia in patients with breast cancer: a survival study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 120:610–614
Truong NU, deB Edwardes MD, Papavasiliou V, Goltzman D, Kremer R (2003) Parathyroid hormone-related peptide and survival with cancer and hypercalcemia. Am J Med 115:115–121
Augustson BM, Begum G, Dunn JA et al (2005) Early mortality after diagnosis of multiple myeloma analysis of patients entered onto the United Kingdom Medical Research Council trials between 1980 and 2002 - Medical Research Council Adult Leukemia Working Party. J Clin Oncol 23:9219–9226
Ling PJ, A’Hern RP, Hardy JR (1995) Analysis of survival following treatment of tumour-induced hypercalcemia with intravenous pamidronate (APD). Br J Cancer 72:206–209
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Penel, N., Dewas, S., Doutrelant, P. et al. Cancer-associated hypercalcemia treated with intravenous diphosphonates: a survival and prognostic factor analysis. Support Care Cancer 16, 387–392 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-007-0322-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-007-0322-z