Abstract
The Lilium longiflorum gH2A promoter is active exclusively in the generative cells of mature pollen in transgenic tobacco expressing the gH2A promoter::GUS (β-glucuronidase) construct as a reporter gene. Temporal and spatial aspects of gH2A promoter activity examined during pollen development in transgenic tobacco reveal that GUS reporter activity was not detected until developing pollen entered the early bicellular developmental stage. Activity was first detected in generative cells at early-mid stages and gradually increased to maximum levels at mid-bicellular stages. The patterns of appearance and longevity of GUS activity in tobacco were very similar to those of gH2A mRNA during pollen development in Lilium. Exogenous treatment with colchicine, a well-known microtubule depolymerize, blocked microspore mitosis and inhibited generative cell differentiation. No GUS signal was detected in the resulting anomalous pollen, which lacked generative cell differentiation. These data strongly suggest that normal generative cell development is essential for activation of the gH2A promoter. Furthermore, these results indicate that common transcriptional activator(s) of the gH2A promoter may be present in both Lilium and Nicotiana, and that such putative factor(s) activates the gH2A promoter only when generative cells undergo normal development.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Differentiation of male and female gametes (sperm and egg cells, respectively) is essential to sexual reproduction. Male gametogenesis in angiosperms starts inside the anther locule. Single microsporocytes derived from undifferentiated archesporial cells undergo meiosis to generate four haploid microspores within the anther. The microspore nucleus migrates toward the cell membrane, and then the polarized microspore undergoes haploid mitosis. The mitosis is a typical asymmetric cell division that gives rise to a large vegetative cell and a small generative cell. The generative cell migrates into the cytoplasm of the vegetative cells and then divides to form two mature male gametes (McCormick 2004, Boavida et al. 2005; Honys et al. 2006; Singh et al. 2008; Dickinson and Grant-Downton 2009; Twell 2010).
One of the most important events during pollen development is microspore mitosis. The generative and vegetative cells resulting from microspore mitosis have different cell fates and acquire distinct functions; the vegetative cell produces the pollen tube, while the generative cell is the progenitor of the male gametes (Tanaka 1997; Twell et al. 1998; Scheres and Benfey 1999; Metzinger and Bergmann 2010). A number of vegetative cell–specific genes have been isolated, and some have been assigned biological function via analyses of the corresponding pollen defective mutants (Twell 1994; McCormick 2004; Twell 2010; Reňák et al. 2011). In contrast, only a few genes have been identified in association with generative cells. For example, several genes expressed in the generative and/or sperm cells have been isolated from Lilium, Nicotiana and Arabidopsis (Xu et al. 1999; Xu et al. 2002; Singh et al. 2003; Rotman et al. 2005; Okada et al. 2005a, b; Engel et al. 2005; Mori et al. 2005). However, the mechanism of gene regulation of male gametic cells has been largely unclear.
We previously isolated the coding regions of male gamete-specific histone genes gH2A, gH2B, and gH3 from Lilium longiflorum (Ueda and Tanaka 1995; Ueda et al. 2000). We further successfully isolated the genomic clone of gH2A and showed that the 2.8 kb upstream of the coding region possessed promoter activity only in the generative cell upon introduction to Nicotiana tabacum (Ueda et al. 2005). In this study, we employed colchicine treatment to interfere with pollen development and showed that the promoter activity of gH2A is closely associated with generative cell development. Our data suggest that similar transcriptional activators associated with male gametic cell-specific gene regulation are common in both monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants.
Materials and methods
Plant materials
T1 transgenic tobacco plants (N. tabacum cv. Samsun NN) were generated from the seeds of T0 transgenic plants carrying the β-glucuronidase (GUS) gene under the control of the male gametic cell-specific 2.8 kb promoter region of the histone gH2A gene (defined as gH2Apro::GUS, Ueda et al. 2005). The 1–6 transgenic line of T0 lines contained a single copy of the transgene. Seeds of transgenic plants were sown onto half-strength MS medium containing 50 mg l−1 kanamycin and allowed to grow for 1 month. The seedlings were transferred to soil and grown to maturity in a growth chamber (CU-225; Tomy Seiko Co., Tokyo, Japan) under greenhouse conditions (16-h light, 8-h dark).
To identify pollen-stage-specific GUS activity, pollen of various developmental stages, ranging from 10 to 50 mm in length, was collected from developing flowers. Mature pollen grains were collected from the flowers after anthesis.
Induction of anomalous pollen
Colchicine was used to inhibit asymmetric cell division, or microspore mitosis, according to the methods described for lily by Tanaka et al. (1998), with minor modifications. The terminal ends of tobacco plantlets with flower buds approximately 10–15 mm in length were cut and placed in a solution of 0.05 % (w/v) colchicine and 3 % (w/v) sucrose for 24 h at 25 °C under 16-h light and 8-h dark growth conditions, and then the plantlets were placed in a 3 % sucrose solution for 4–8 days until flowering. The mature pollen grains from these open flowers were subjected to the GUS assay.
Assays of GUS activity
For histochemical staining, anthers containing microspores and developing pollen grains were squeezed with a sterilized toothpick in a solution containing 0.3 M sucrose and 80 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.8). The cells were fixed with 90 % (v/v) acetone for 1–5 h at −20 °C and then incubated in a reaction solution containing 1.9 mM 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-glucuronic acid (X-gluc; Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Osaka, Japan) for 2–12 h at 37 °C. After the GUS staining of microspore and pollen grains, the preparations were counter-stained with 2 μg ml−1 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Sigma Chemical Co.) for DNA staining. GUS activity was examined for 150–250 pollen grains.
RT-PCR analysis
Microspores and developing pollen grains were released from anthers of a 1–6.4 transformant by squeezing with a sterilized toothpick in a solution containing 0.3 M sucrose and 80 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.8), and then were collected by centrifugation at 13,400g for 5 min at 25 °C. Total RNA was extracted from each cell fraction using the RNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen, Tokyo, Japan). To avoid amplification of genomic DNA, the RNA fractions were subjected to RNase-free DNase treatment. The DNase reaction solution contained total RNA (~10 μg), 1× DNase reaction buffer, 10 units of RNase-free DNase (RQ1; Promega KK, Tokyo, Japan), and 1 unit of RNasein (Promega KK) and was incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. Purified total RNA (approximately 0.5 μg) was reverse-transcribed with oligo (dT)18 primer for the first-strand cDNA synthesis (Transcriptor First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit; Roche Diagnostics KK, Tokyo, Japan) as recommended by the manufacturer. The PCR mixture (20 μl) consisted of 1× PCR buffer, 0.5 μl cDNA product, 0.2 mM dNTP mixture, 0.4 μM gene-specific primers, and 1× Advantage 2 polymerase mix (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan). The RT-PCR was performed for the following generative cell–specific genes: NtS1 (encoding a polygalacturonase) and NtS2 (unknown function) identified by Xu et al. (2002), and Ntsp0018 and Ntsp0412, both of which encode unknown proteins identified by Xin et al. (2011). In addition, we examined R2R3 MYB-like B25 gene in close association of dedifferentiation of immature pollen grains (Kyo et al. 2003) and a vegetative cell–specific polygalacturonase gene, Npg1 (Tebbutt et al. 1994). Primers used to amplify cDNA are listed in Table 1. Amplification was basically performed by 35 cycles of 94 °C/30 s, 60 °C/30 s and 72 °C/1 min except for the below case. The annealing temperature of Ntsp0018 PCR was 57 °C instead of 60 °C, and the number of PCR cycles for the β-tubulin gene was 30 instead of 35.
Results
Isolation of transgenic tobacco plants homozygous for the gH2Apro::GUS construct
We previously reported 11 transgenic tobacco lines (T0) showing GUS activity driven by the gH2A promoter (Ueda et al. 2005). In all T0 plants, GUS activity was detected only in generative cells within pollen grains, and not in vegetative cells of pollen, nor in somatic cells (Ueda et al. 2005). These lines showed a variety of GUS activities. For example, line 2–14 displayed barely detectable activity even after 24 h, whereas 2–1 showed strong generative cell–specific activity immediately after the reaction was started; by 24 h, the indigo blue products had diffused. In contrast, line 1–6 clearly developed clear blue color 2 h after initiation of the reaction and maintained color for 24 h; this line was chosen for further study. Line 1–6 carried a single copy of the transgene, as estimated from segregation data (Ueda et al. 2005). To obtain a homozygous line, seeds of the 1–6 T0 plant were grown on a selective medium containing kanamycin, transferred to soil, and grown until pollen fully developed. Then, GUS activity of the pollen was determined. One of the kanamycin-resistant plants, 1–6.4, produced mature pollen grains that all accumulated indigo blue products only around the generative cell nucleus and hence was determined to be homozygous for the transgene (Fig. 1a, b). In contrast, only half of the pollen grains after flowering of the 1–6.1 plant displayed GUS activity, indicating that 1–6.1 had a hemizygous constitution (Fig. 1c, d).
As we reported previously (Ueda et al. 2005), GUS staining was exclusively localized around the generative nuclei (Fig. 1a–d). Generative and sperm cells within pollen grains of many plants have been reported to be spindle-shaped (Russell and Cass 1981; Heslop-Harrison et al. 1988; Tanaka et al. 1989; Xu et al. 1999); the shape of the GUS-stained blue color appeared to be ellipsoidal or spherical, depending on the angle at which we viewed the sample grains (Fig. 1a–d).
GUS activity during pollen development
We next examined GUS activity in different pollen developmental stages, from microspore stage to maturity. The developmental stages of pollen in tobacco are approximately related to the length of the flower buds (Twell et al. 1993; Twell 1994); we found similar relationships for the 1–6.4 plants under our growth conditions (Fig. 3). GUS activity was not detected when buds were 8–19 mm in length, sizes that corresponded to the microspore, microspore mitosis, and early bicellular pollen stages (Figs. 2a–d, 3). GUS activity was first detected in several pollen grains when buds reached about 20 mm in length (Fig. 3). Thereafter, the percentage of GUS-positive pollen grains increased until almost of all showed GUS activity by the time the buds reached 30 mm in length, corresponding to the early-mid bicellular pollen stage. Furthermore, the intensity of the blue color also varied depending on developmental stages. For example, strong GUS activity was observed after 2 h of incubation in 40-mm bicellular pollen (Figs. 2e–f, 3), whereas 20-mm bicellular pollen displayed only pale blue staining after 24 h (Fig. 3). We concluded that the gH2A promoter activity was initiated soon after microspore mitosis, gradually increased by the mid-bicellular pollen stage, and was maintained until pollen maturity.
GUS activity in anomalous pollen
To further determine the importance of microspore mitosis that precedes the activation of the gH2A promoter, we inhibited asymmetric cell division by treating with colchicine. Colchicine is well known to inhibit microtubule assembly and consequently to inhibit the normal asymmetric cell division of microspores (Eady et al. 1995; Twell et al. 1998; Tanaka et al. 1998). The cells in buds of 10–15 mm in length, just before microspore mitosis, were treated with a moderate amount of colchicine (0.05 %) for 24 h, and GUS activity was determined upon flowering. Approximately 46, 56, and 94 % of total mature pollen originating from three independent buds that were treated at the 12, 11 and 10-mm microspore stage, respectively, did not show GUS activity (Fig. 4). When the pollen nuclei were stained with DAPI (4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole), the GUS-positive pollen displayed both typical ellipsoidal generative and spherical vegetative nuclei (Fig. 4a, b, e–g). In contrast, GUS-negative pollen had only one or two spherical vegetative cell–like nuclei (Fig. 4a, b, h–m). Thus, GUS activity was exclusively observed in normally developed pollen. When mature pollen originating from 13-mm microspore stage or later stages (for example 15 mm) were examined, almost all the generative cells in individual pollen grains were normally formed when viewed with DAPI staining, and these pollen grains displayed positive GUS activity (Fig. 4c, d). Therefore, inhibition of asymmetric cell division led to the loss of GUS activity, and the gH2A promoter was activated only when developing pollen produced generative cells.
Gene expression analysis for cell fate markers in the gH2Apro::GUS transgenic plants
To further study the gH2Apro::GUS expression profile and the relatedness to developmental stages, we employed known cell fate marker genes and determined their transcriptional activation by RT-PCR analysis (Fig. 5). We amplified four generative cell–specific genes: NtS1 (encoding a polygalacturonase), NtS2, Ntsp0018, and Ntsp0412 whose functions are unknown, and a putative R2R3 MYB transcription factor B25 gene that is associated with the tobacco pollen dedifferentiation (Xu et al. 2002; Xin et al. 2011; Kyo et al. 2003). In addition, Npg1 gene encoding a polygalacturonase was used as a vegetative cell fate marker gene (Tebbutt et al. 1994). Under our greenhouse conditions, microspore mitosis occurs within the buds of around 15 mm in length (Fig. 3). No PCR signal of gH2Apro::GUS was detectable in microspores of buds of 8, 10 and 12 mm in length, and the faint signal was detectable in cells of 15- and 20-mm buds (Fig. 5). Subsequently, prominent signals were detected in bicellular pollen grains of 25–45-mm buds in addition to mature pollen grains (Fig. 5). Thus, temporal appearance and amplitude of GUS activity agreed well with the accumulation pattern of gH2Apro::GUS transcripts (compare Figs. 3, 5). Transcripts of NtS1 and NtS2 genes were detected in both nearly mature and mature pollen grains (Fig. 5). In addition, the signal of NtS1 gene was uniquely detectable in cells at the microspore mitosis stage (12- and 15-mm buds), suggesting that it is possibly involved in cell division (Fig. 5). Transcripts of Ntsp0018 were only detected in cells within over 25-mm buds, and Ntsp0412 was detectable initially in cells of 15- and 20-mm buds with low intensity and then gradually accumulated in the developing pollen until maturity (Fig. 5). These expression patterns, especially those of Ntsp0412 gene, were very similar to the pattern of GUS gene control by the gH2A promoter (Fig. 5). Transcript of the B25 gene was detected prominently in the cells of late microspore stage (buds of 12 mm in length) and continued to be detected until the mature pollen stage (Fig. 5). A vegetative cell–specific gene, Npg1, was first detected in cells of 15-mm buds and continued to be detected until mature pollen (Fig. 5). A PCR product of a β-tubulin gene was detected prominently in all samples investigated (Fig. 5). No signal was detectable in all samples when a RT-PCR was performed without reverse transcriptase (data not shown).
Discussion
As previously shown, transgenic tobacco plants containing the gH2Apro::GUS construct display generative cell–specific expression of the GUS gene (Ueda et al. 2005). In the current study, we refine this observation and demonstrated that the GUS gene was activated soon after microspore mitosis. Exogenous application of colchicine interfered simultaneously with generative cell formation and GUS gene expression, suggesting that microspore mitosis is required for the gH2A gene to be activated. Colchicine treatment of microspores in tobacco induced the formation of pollen with one or two vegetative cell–like nuclei (Fig. 4a, b, h–m, Eady et al. 1995; Twell et al. 1998). In contrast to the case of gH2A, these anomalous pollen grains have been shown to express the LAT52 gene promoter::GUS construct specifically in the vegetative cell (Eady et al. 1995; Twell et al. 1998), and thus, this construct has been used as a vegetative cell fate marker (Chen and McCormick 1996; Matsushima et al. 2008; Berger et al. 2008; Chen et al. 2009; Kim et al. 2011). We further suggest that the gH2A promoter may be a cell fate marker specific to generative cells.
Several Arabidopsis mutants terminate pollen development at specific stages, from microspore through mature pollen stages, depending on the mutant (Borg et al. 2009; Oh et al. 2011; Twell 2011). For example, the GEMINI POLLEN 1 (GEM1) gene encodes a microtubule-associated family protein (Park et al. 1998; Twell et al. 2002). The Gem1 mutation eliminates asymmetric microspore cell division and thereby produces defective pollen with vegetative-like cells that express a LAT52 cell fate marker gene. The mutants have reduced genetic transmission (Park et al. 1998; Twell et al. 2002). Another example, SIDECAR POLLEN (SCP), encodes a novel LOB/AS2 domain nuclear protein. An scp mutation caused symmetric cell division prior to asymmetric cell division and thus produced “four-celled” pollen grains with an extra vegetative cell (Chen and McCormick 1996; Oh et al. 2010). The mutation also reduced male genetic transmission (Chen and McCormick 1996; Oh et al. 2010). These results show the importance of normal asymmetric cell division during pollen development, including the differentiation of generative cells. The gH2A gene appears to be activated soon after asymmetric cell division, suggesting that the gH2A protein plays an important role in pollen development in L. longiflorum.
The lily gH2A gene is expressed soon after microspore mitosis (Ueda et al. 2000), which coincides with its expression profile in tobacco (Fig. 3). Similar mechanisms underlying the activation of the gH2A gene may exist in both lily and tobacco. In Arabidopsis, the male gamete-specific histone H3 gene, AtMGH3, seems to be activated soon after microspore mitosis (Okada et al. 2005b), suggesting that a common regulatory mechanism may be operating for histone gene activation in lily, tobacco and Arabidopsis. Recently, the Arabidopsis R2R3 MYB transcription factor, AtDUO1, was reported to be involved in the activation of a number of male germline cell–specific genes or male germline cell–enriched genes, including the AtMGH3 gene (Brownfield et al. 2009; Borg et al. 2011). The DNA binding sites of the AtDUO1 protein were identified to be TAACCG, and similar sequences occurred at least four times in the promoter region of the AtMGH3 gene in both forward and reverse orientations (Borg et al. 2011). MYB transcription factors from both plant and animal cells are well known to recognize the specific consensus sequence AACNG, which is referred to as the “MYB Binding Site” (Biedenkapp et al. 1988; Ogata et al. 1994; Borg et al. 2011). We found in this study an identical AtDUO1 binding sequence, TAACCG, 141 bp upstream of the initiation codon of gH2A gene. In addition, we found three canonical MYB binding sites AACTG (−583, −135 and −117) and four AACCG binding sites (−1262, −207, −142, −55; Ueda et al. 2005). These sequences may provide the target sites for putative MYB-like transcription factors of lily and tobacco. In contrast to the MYB-like activators, the negative regulator, GRSF (germline-restrictive silencing factor), has been reported to bind to the promoter region of the generative cell–specific LGC1 gene of lily, and it suppresses that gene’s expression in microspores, pollen vegetative cells, and vegetative tissues (Haerizadeh et al. 2006). The GRSF protein recognizes the 8-bp core binding site CTGAATTT, and we found a similar sequence, CTGAATTAAA, about 600 bp upstream of the initiation codon in the gH2A promoter described previously (Ueda et al. 2005). In addition to the GRSF binding motif, Okada et al. (2005a, b) reported that a 9-bp motif, CCAAATTCA, a putative cis-regulatory element, was conserved between AtMGH3 and lily gcH3 promoters. We also found exactly the same sequence −556 bp upstream of the initiation codon in the gH2A promoter. These positive and negative regulators are likely to regulate gH2A gene expression, and the developmental switch appears to take place soon after microspore mitosis (Fig. 3).
The results of the GUS enzymatic activity by the gH2A promoter during pollen development agreed with GUS gene expression pattern of that by RT-PCR (Figs. 2, 3, 5). We further examined co-expression of gH2A with four generative cell fate markers, NtS1, NtS2, Ntsp0018, and Ntsp0412 genes (Fig. 5). Among these, the expression patterns of the latter two genes, especially Ntsp0412, were coincided with those of GUS mRNA by gH2A promoter (Fig. 5). This suggests that both gH2A promoter and expression of these protein genes are controlled by the same putative regulatory factor or that one of these two unknown proteins can activate transcription of the gH2A promoter. On the other hand, the B25 gene was first identified as a transcript associated with immature pollen dedifferentiation in tobacco (Kyo et al. 2003). Hafidh et al. (2012) reported that B25 expressed in pollen was a putative tobacco ortholog of a R2R3 MYB Arabidopsis DUO1 gene, because of its structural similarity (approximately 48 % amino acid sequence identity between them). However, our detailed expression analysis showed that B25 was abundantly expressed at a late microspore stage (buds of 12 mm in length). In contrast, DUO1 is not expressed in the late microspore in Arabidopsis (Rotman et al. 2005; Brownfield et al. 2009). Therefore, B25 gene does not seem to behave as an ortholog of AtDUO1 gene. Future work should determine whether the developmental regulatory promoter regions described here provide the target sites for putative activators and/or suppressors.
References
Berger F, Hamamura Y, Ingouff M, Higashiyama T (2008) Double fertilization—caught in the act. Trends Plant Sci 13:437–443
Biedenkapp H, Borgmeyer U, Sippel AE, Klempnauer K-H (1988) Viral myb oncogene encodes a sequence-specific DNA binding activity. Nature 335:835–837
Boavida LC, Becker JD, Feijó JA (2005) The making of gametes in higher plants. Int J Dev Biol 49:595–614
Borg M, Brownfield L, Twell D (2009) Male gametophyte development: a molecular perspective. J Exp Bot 60:1465–1478
Borg M, Brownfield L, Khatab H, Sidorova A, Lingaya M, Twell D (2011) The R2R3 MYB transcription factor DUO1 activates a male germline-specific regulon essential for sperm cell differentiation in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 23:534–549
Brownfield L, Hafidh S, Borg M, Sidorova A, Mori T, Twell D (2009) A plant germline-specific integrator of sperm specification and cell cycle progression. PLoS Genet 5:e1000430
Chen YC, McCormick S (1996) Sidecar pollen, an Arabidopsis thaliana male gametophytic mutant with aberrant cell divisions during pollen development. Development 122:3243–3253
Chen Z, Hafidh S, Poh SH, Twell D, Berger F (2009) Proliferation and cell fate establishment during Arabidopsis male gametogenesis depends on the Retinoblastoma protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:7257–7262
Dickinson HG, Grant-Downton R (2009) Bridging the generation gap: flowering plant gametophytes and animal germlines reveal unexpected similarities. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 84:589–615
Eady C, Lindsey K, Twell D (1995) The significance of microspore division and division symmetry for vegetative cell-specific transcription and generative cell differentiation. Plant Cell 7:65–74
Engel ML, Holmes-Davis R, McCormick S (2005) Green sperm: identification of male gamete promoters in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol 138:2124–2133
Haerizadeh F, Singh MB, Bhalla PL (2006) Transcriptional repression distinguishes somatic from germ cell lineages in a plant. Science 313:496–499
Hafidh S, Breznenová1 K, Růžička P, Feciková J, Čapková V, Honys D (2012) Comprehensive analysis of tobacco pollen transcriptome unveils common pathways in polar cell expansion and underlying heterochronic shift during spermatogenesis. BMC Plant Biol 12:24
Heslop-Harrison J, Heslop-Harrison Y, Cresti M, Tiezzi A, Moscatelli A (1988) Cytoskeletal elements, cell shaping and movement in the angiosperm pollen tube. J Cell Sci 91:49–60
Honys D, Reňák D, Twell D (2006) Male gametophyte development and function. In: Teixeira da Silva JA (ed) Floriculture, ornamental and plant biotechnology: advances and topical issues, 1st edn. Global Science Books, London, pp 76–87
Kim HJ, Ok SH, Bahn SC, Jang J, Oh SA, Park SK, Twell D, Ryu SB, Shin JS (2011) Endoplasmic reticulum- and golgi-localized phospholipase A2 plays critical roles in Arabidopsis pollen development and germination. Plant Cell 23:94–110
Kyo M, Hattori S, Yamaji N, Pechan P, Fukui H (2003) Cloning and characterization of cDNAs associated with the embryogenic dedifferentiation of tobacco immature pollen grains. Plant Sci 164:1057–1066
Matsushima R, Hamamura Y, Higashiyama T, Arimura S, Sodmergen T, Tsutsumi N, Sakamoto W (2008) Mitochondrial dynamics in plant male gametophyte visualized by fluorescent live imaging. Plant Cell Physiol 49:1074–1083
McCormick S (2004) Control of male gametophyte development. Plant Cell 16:S142–S153
Metzinger CA, Bergmann DC (2010) Plant asymmetric cell division regulators: pinch-hitting for PARs? F1000 Biol Rep 2:25
Mori T, Kuroiwa H, Higashiyama T, Kuroiwa T (2005) GENERATIVE CELL SPECIFIC 1 is essential for angiosperm fertilization. Nat Cell Biol 8:64–71
Ogata K, Morikawa S, Nakamura H, Sekikawa A, Inoue T, Kanai H, Sarai A, Ishii S, Nishimura Y (1994) Solution structure of a specific DNA complex of the Myb DNA-binding domain with cooperative recognition helices. Cell 79:639–648
Oh SA, Park KS, Twell D, Park SK (2010) The SIDECAR POLLEN gene encodes a microspore-specific LOB/AS2 domain protein required for the correct timing and orientation of asymmetric cell division. Plant J 64:839–850
Oh SA, Twell D, Park SK (2011) SIDECAR POLLEN suggests a plant-specific regulatory network underlying asymmetric microspore division in Arabidopsis. Plant Signal Behav 6:416–419
Okada T, Bhalla PL, Singh MB (2005a) Transcriptional activity of male gamete-specific histone gcH3 promoter in sperm cells of Lilium longiflorum. Plant Cell Physiol 46:797–802
Okada T, Endo M, Singh MB, Bhalla PL (2005b) Analysis of the histone H3 gene family in Arabidopsis and identification of the male-gamete-specific variant AtMGH3. Plant J 44:557–568
Park SK, Howden R, Twell D (1998) The Arabidopsis thaliana gametophytic mutation gemini pollen1 disrupts microspore polarity, division asymmetry and pollen cell fate. Development 125:3789–3799
Reňák D, Dupl’áková N, Honys D (2011) Wide-scale screening of T-DNA lines for transcription factor genes affecting male gametophyte development in Arabidopsis. Sex Plant Reprod. doi:10.1007/s00497-011-0178-8
Rotman N, Durbarry A, Wardle A, Yang WC, Chaboud A, Faure JE, Berger F, Twell D (2005) A novel class of MYB factors controls sperm-cell formation in plants. Curr Biol 15:244–248
Russell SD, Cass DD (1981) Ultrastructure of the sperms of Plumbago zeylanica. 1. Cytology and association with the vegetative nucleus. Protoplasma 107:85–107
Scheres B, Benfey PN (1999) Asymmetric cell division in plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 50:505–537
Singh M, Bhalla PL, Xu H, Singh MB (2003) Isolation and characterization of a flowering plant male gametic cell-specific promoter. FEBS Lett 542:47–52
Singh MB, Bhalla PL, Russell SD (2008) Molecular repertoire of flowering plant male germ cells. Sex Plant Reprod 20:27–36
Tanaka I (1997) Differentiation of generative and vegetative cells in angiosperm pollen. Sex Plant Reprod 10:1–7
Tanaka I, Nakamura S, Miki-Hirosige H (1989) Structural features of isolated generative cells and their protoplasts from pollen of some liliaceous plants. Gamete Res 24:361–374
Tanaka I, Ono K, Fukuda T (1998) The developmental fate of angiosperm pollen is associated with a preferential decrease in the level of histone H1 in the vegetative nucleus. Planta 206:561–569
Tebbutt SJ, Rogers HJ, Lonsdale DM (1994) Characterization of a tobacco gene encoding a pollen-specific polygalacturonase. Plant Mol Biol 25:283–297
Twell D (1994) The diversity and regulation of gene expression in the pathway of male gametophyte development. In: Scott RJ, Stead AD (eds) Molecular and cellular aspects of plant reproduction. Seminar series 55, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 83–135
Twell D (2010) Male gametophyte development. In: Pua EC, Davey MR (eds) Plant developmental biology-biotechnological perspectives vol 1. Springer-Verlag Berlin, pp 225–244
Twell D (2011) Male gametogenesis and germline specification in flowering plants. Sex Plant Reprod 24:149–160
Twell D, Patel S, Sorensen A, Roberts M, Scott R, Draper J, Foster G (1993) Activation and developmental regulation of on Arabidopsis anther-specific promoter in microspores and pollen of Nicotiana tabacum. Sex Plant Reprod 6:217–224
Twell D, Park SK, Lalanne E (1998) Asymmetric division and cell-fate determination in developing pollen. Trends Plant Sci 3:305–310
Twell D, Park SK, Hawkins TJ, Schubert D, Schmidt R, Smertenko A, Hussey PJ (2002) MOR1/GEM1 has an essential role in the plant-specific cytokinetic phragmoplast. Nat Cell Biol 4:711–714
Ueda K, Tanaka I (1995) The appearance of male gamete-specific histones gH2B and gH3 during pollen development in Lilium longiflorum. Dev Biol 169:210–217
Ueda K, Kinoshita Y, Xu ZJ, Ide N, Ono M, Akahori Y, Tanaka I, Inoue M (2000) Unusual core histones specifically expressed in male gametic cells of Lilium longiflorum. Chromosoma 108:491–500
Ueda K, Suzuki M, Ono M, Ide N, Tanaka I, Inoue M (2005) Male gametic cell-specific histone gH2A gene of Lilium longiflorum: genomic structure and promoter activity in the generative cell. Plant Mol Biol 59:229–238
Xin HP, Peng XB, Ning J, Yan TT, Ma LG, Sun MX (2011) Expressed sequence-tag analysis of tobacco sperm cells reveals a unique transcriptional profile and selective persistence of paternal transcripts after fertilization. Sex Plant Reprod 24:37–46
Xu H, Swoboda I, Bhalla PL, Singh MB (1999) Male gametic cell-specific gene expression in flowering plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96:2554–2558
Xu H, Weterings K, Vriezen W, Feron R, Xue Y, Derksen J, Mariani C (2002) Isolation and characterization of male-germ-cell transcripts in Nicotiana tabacum. Sex Plant Reprod 14:339–346
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank K. Toyosawa for excellent technical assistance.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by David Twell.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ueda, K., Ono, M., Iwashita, J. et al. Generative cell–specific activation of the histone gH2A gene promoter of Lilium longiflorum in tobacco. Sex Plant Reprod 25, 247–255 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00497-012-0194-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00497-012-0194-3