Introduction

Slit ventricle syndrome (SVS) is a catchall term for a combined clinical and imaging situation in which symptoms in a shunted child are associated with small ventricular spaces [3, 4, 9, 19].

In its severe form, the clinical picture is one of acute or semi-acute headache, nausea, vomiting, and/or lethargy. The headaches are often precipitated by fever, activity or warm weather. They are episodic, typically presenting as pressure waves, often terminating in vomiting or hyperventilation, and are sometimes associated with bradycardia and systemic hypertension [3, 4, 12]. Neurological findings of ataxia, brain stem signs, and epileptic fits were reported as well [3, 17]. A computed tomography (CT) scan at the time of an attack shows small ventricles, but this finding is usually no different from scans that were done during periods of remission. The symptoms of SVS usually appear 2–5 years after a shunt had been placed during the first year of life, mostly in children with a small head circumference, under the 25th percentile [3, 4].

The treatment for SVS is aimed at either optimizing CSF drainage or at increasing calvarial volume. Therapeutic decision-making may not be easy due to the fact that although attacks are usually severe in nature, they subside spontaneously; moreover, the situation may be self-limiting in some children. Any noninvasive method that would be effective in relieving an acute attack and perhaps reducing the frequency of episodes would be helpful [13, 17].

We report our recent and positive experience with the use of corticosteroids in the treatment of symptomatic SVS attacks and discuss the indications and possible mechanism of action.

Materials and methods

We reviewed the charts of 13 children over the age of 5 years with ventricular shunts complicated by SVS that are being treated and followed in the Pediatric Neurosurgery Department in Dana Children’s Hospital. They all experienced attacks of headaches with or without vomiting, and slit or small ventricles were demonstrated on CT or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). There were 9 boys and 4 girls whose mean age was 8.9±3.5 years (range 5–15). The patients’ data were retrieved from their medical charts and by questioning the parents on their child’s response to dexamethasone treatment.

Observations and results

The clinical details of the study participants are summarized in Table 1. The etiology of hydrocephalus was prematurity and intraventricular hemorrhage in 9 patients and neonatal meningitis, chorioamnionitis, Dandy–Walker variant, and congenital in 1 case each. The mean age at ventriculoperitoneal shunt insertion was 1.8±1.0 months, range 0.5–4 months. The average age at SVS diagnosis was 4.9±3.2 years (range 1–13). All patients had repeated ventriculoperitoneal shunt revisions before corticosteroid treatment, and one patient underwent cranial expansion for scaphocephaly (Table 1).

Table 1 Clinical characteristics of the 13 study patients. SVS slit ventricle syndrome, FU follow-up, IVH intraventricular hemorrhage, VPS ventriculoperitoneal shunt, VPSR ventriculoperitoneal shunt revisions, LPS lumboperitoneal shunt, STD subtemporal decompression

All the patients were treated by oral dexamethasone for at least one episode. The length of treatment ranged between 3 and 10 days: the daily dose was 0.5 mg/kg and the total dose ranged from 4 to 12 mg. Two patients were treated concomitantly by acetazolamide. All patients reported symptomatic relief within 48 h and shorter duration of the attack compared with previous attacks without the administration of dexamethasone. None of the children required an emergency surgical procedure, but the treatment did not prevent further attacks in most of them. Nine patients required surgical treatment for their SVS: bilateral subtemporal decompression in 6, lumboperitoneal shunt in 2, and an additional ventriculoperitoneal shunt in 2 (one patient underwent both bilateral subtemporal decompression and distal ventriculoperitoneal shunt). The mean interval between steroid treatment to surgery or last follow-up was 11±8 months. Two patients had recurrence of clinical symptoms of SVS after subtemporal decompression and dexamethasone was reinstated.

It was determined that four patients did not require a surgical procedure for SVS at the time of this study and they were treated conservatively by dexamethasone. One of them had a symptomatic trapped fourth ventricle, which was treated by steroids as well. One child underwent cranial expansion for scaphocephaly: he was treated by dexamethasone for SVS and did not require further surgery for SVS for the last 24 months of follow-up. Two patients had complications associated with steroid treatment: abdominal pain and skin infection. Both resolved within a short period and did not discourage further use of steroids (Table 1).

Discussion and conclusions

This is the first report in the English literature on the effects of dexamethasone on the symptomatology of acute SVS attacks. The treatment of SVS is often frustrating for the child, the family, and the treating physician. There are several surgical alternatives to treating resistant SVS attacks [3, 4, 17]. “Up-grading” the type of shunt-valve can occasionally prevent collapse of the ventricular system and therefore reduce the potential for proximal shunt obstruction [15]. Revising the obstructed ventricular catheter is dangerous due to a high incidence of bleeding and the technical difficulty of placing the tube through a small fluid space in an optimal trajectory [11]. Lumboperitoneal shunts have been also proposed for children with extraventricular obstruction [14, 16, 20]. Subtemporal decompression and other alternatives designed to increase the volume of the skull are often considered by parents as being “aggressive,” and these approaches are not always effective [57, 10, 13]. Antimigraine therapy with cyproheptadine (Periactin) or propanolol is helpful in some children who have subacute or chronic headaches with high intracranial pressure but a functioning shunt [8, 18].

Worrisome symptoms of SVS often happen during the night and mandate quick responses. None of the existing surgical alternatives offers resolution of symptoms in all patients. Some of the proposed procedures, especially proximal shunt revision, can have catastrophic results. An alternative means that is effective in alleviating an SVS attack and perhaps reducing the frequency of symptoms would be highly welcome.

The idea of giving steroids in this situation was initially empirical. Having been proved to be effective, we introduced it into our routine armamentarium of treatment options. We believe that all the patients in the current series had intermittent extraventricular hydrocephalus due a transient proximal shunt obstruction on a noncompliant brain. The fact that the ventricles have not been enlarged to any extent during an acute SVS attack is probably indirect evidence that there is no obstruction within the ventricular system. High pressure waves in these children should not, therefore, be expected to lead to herniation. In children with obtundation, bradycardia, and systemic hypertension, however, extreme care should be taken during the attack, preferably in an intensive care setting. Children with enlarging ventricles or with fluid spaces that are not collapsed should probably be immediately referred for a shunt revision. Trying to delay decisions in such situations may potentially lead to a disaster.

Treatment with dexamethasone can serve as a prompt way of lowering the intracranial pressure as a temporary measure until a decision regarding the surgical procedure with optimal timing can be made. This treatment carries a low risk of complications and may well prevent resorting to emergency procedures that entail a high risk of infection and other complications. Performing the surgical procedure on an elective basis enables a better work-up of the case and improved preparation of the patient for surgery.

In conclusion, short-term treatment with dexamethasone is effective in acute attacks of headaches, vomiting, and lethargy attributed to SVS. It can provide temporary relief during the decision-making process of whether and when to perform surgery.