Abstract
Knowledge of the potential variants of ileocecal valve, the most frequent pathologic conditions as well as some pitfalls encountered during the analysis of CT Colonography images are thus indispensable for radiologists who perform and interpret such examinations and for general practitioners who are approaching this technique. Awareness of these different diagnostic possibilities is mandatory for radiologists evaluating CT Colonography datasets. Combined analysis of 2D axial and reformatted slices and 3D endouminal views provides the highest level of diagnostic accuracy. We present the multidetector CT Colonography findings with endoscopic correlation and discuss the possible pathologies and the practical implications
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
CT colonography (CTC) is a rapid evolving method for detection of colorectal polyps and cancer that enables both two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) evaluation of the colon [1–3].
To date, CTC has been found in multiple studies to be nearly as sensitive as Video colonoscopy in the detection of polyps 10 mm and larger [4–7].
The ileocecal valve (ICV) is a normal anatomic muscular structure located between the small and large intestine.
ICV is easily identified during CTC examinations on the medial aspect of the cecum. However, radiologists should be aware of possible anatomical variants as well of different pathologic processes, benign and malignant, which might affect the ICV, in order to avoid image misinterpretation.
The present pictorial essay reviews the normal anatomy of ICV and the anatomic variants, the most frequent pathologic conditions as well as some pitfalls encountered during the analysis of CTC images.
CT Colonography Technique
Following bowel preparation using predominantly cathartic agents alone or combined with some fecal tagging agents and gaseous colonic distension with either air or CO2, multidetector-row CT (MDCT) scans of the abdomen and pelvis from the diaphragm to the pubic symphysis are acquired with the patient in prone and supine position [8]. Scanning protocol depends on the available CT equipment, but on MDCT an effective slice thickness of 3 mm or less and a reconstruction interval of 1 mm are advisable [9, 10]. MilliAmpere/second value is dependent on dose delivery, with low-dose protocol using 70 mAs or less [9, 10].
Image post-processing is performed on dedicated off-line workstations, suitable for 3D data management and reconstruction. Minimal requirements for the analysis of a VC study includes the simultaneous display of axial slices, reformatted sagittal and coronal planes (sometimes also oblique reformations may be available), and endoluminal views. Other complimentary projections include Tissue Transition Projection or (“virtual double contrast enema”), unfolded cube display and “virtual dissection”, with the colon sliced lengthwise and laid open for en face inspection.
Virtual dissection is a new 3D rendering technique that draws a midline trace through the colon and displays the entire luminal surface of the colon as a flattened 2D image. The image produced resembles the pathologic display of a resected colon specimen. Using this software ICV is displayed along its entire longitudinal axis (Figure 1).
Normal Findings and Anatomic Variants
ICV, also known as valvula Bauhini or Sphincter coli, is formed by corresponding portions of the bluntly ending ileal walls called upper and lower lips (labia), that are formed by an intrusion of the circular muscle layer of the ileum within the cecum [11]. The proper function of this structure, acting not only mechanically, but also as a true sphincter, is to regulate transit of ileal contents into the cecum and preventing, under normal conditions, reflux of caecal content into the ileum.
A good familiarity with spectrum of different appearances, site and dimension of this structure is necessary in order to distinguish a normal from an abnormal ICV [12].
ICV is commonly located on the medial aspect of caecal wall; ICV does not projects freely into the colon but it is supported and suspended by fixed folds of the cecum, called frenula of the valve. Fleishner et al. [13] reported in 7% of the cases a direct implantation of the ileum into the posterior wall of the colon.
The endoscopic appearance of ICV, simulated also by CTC endoluminal views, has been classified, according to its morphology, into two types: papillary with a domelike protrusion having its mouth at the apex (Figure 2), or labial, appearing as a slit-like opening [14] (Figure 3). In most of the cases CTC endoluminal images may depict the orifice, as a tiny central depression on the valve (Figure 4), and occasionally an open valve may be visualized [15] (Figure 5).
The use of CO2 is slightly better in adequacy of distension comparing to air and may prevent opening of the ICV thus providing lower degree of distension of small bowel [16, 17]. There is no consensus about the normal size of the valve and consequently when it has to be defined as enlarged. Lasser and Rigler [18] measured normal valves and assessed that normal thickness for each lips is up to 1.5 cm.
Hinkel and El-Amin in a more recent study defined the maximal height of the ICV nearly 4 cm [19, 20] Possible etiologies producing enlargement of ICV include idiopathic and post-traumatic edema, submucosal fat accumulation, herniation of ileal mucosa, tumor (benign and malignant) and inflammatory lesions involving the valve.
Lipomatosis
Lipomatosis of the ICV is a frequent condition, also known as lipohyperplasia, hypertrophy, fatty degeneration or ICV syndrome, characterized by enlargement of the valve due to submucosal fatty infiltration. Lipomatosis is usually asymptomatic and surgical resection must be avoided.
On endoluminal CTC view, the valve is enlarged, although this finding is aspecific and the diagnosis can be easily established only if axial CT images, observed using abdominal window setting, show significant fatty tissue within the lips of ICV (Figure 6). The absence of a distinct capsule helps in differentiating this condition from a true lipoma arising from the lips of the valve [20].
In some cases lipomatosis may be associated with Crohn’s disease [21].
In order to exclude the presence of Crohn’s disease, even if Crohn’s disease as well as ulcerative colitis represent a contraindication to CTC exam, when incidentally discovered a careful evaluation of the terminal ileum together with surrounding peri-colic fatty tissue has to be assessed.
Inflammatory Lesions
Several inflammatory processes of the ileo-caecal region may involve ICV, with the most frequent being Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. But tuberculosis, ameobiasis, typhoid fever and actinomycosis may also be observed.
In Crohn’s disease the valve is usually enlarged due to a panenteric lymphedema; a thickened wall of the terminal ileum as well as stranding of the surrounding fatty tissue and multiple locoregional lymphadenopathies are among the other possible associated findings (Figure 7).
In the case of ulcerative colitis ICV is more rigid or irregular, but usually not enlarged; quite often it is open due to incontinency, as opposite to Crohn’s disease where it is typically tightly closed (Figure 8).
Neoplasms
Another possible cause of ICV enlargement is represented by neoplasms.
ICV can be the site for both benign and malignant lesions. Since ICV contains histological elements of both cecum and small bowel, it can be involved by malignant tumors arising from each of these segments.
Lipoma accounts for the most common benign lesion of ICV whose major differential diagnosis is lipomatosis. Polyps may arise from the valve and have the same appearance as in other colonic areas (Figure 9).
ICV is also a very rare site for gastrointestinal cancers: to date only few cases of adenocarcinomas have been reported [22]. These tumors are usually vegetating sessile lesions with a large base of implant and are characterized by irregular mucosal surface (Figure 10). Sometimes, tumor surface may appear smooth resulting in a difficult differentiation from a benign lesion (Figure 11).
Lymphosarcoma arising from ICV usually involves terminal ileum while adenocarcinoma is usually confined to cecum (Figure 12).
Lymphomas of ileocecal region has the same radiological features of those involving other intestinal segments.
Pitfalls
Possible pitfalls in interpretation are represented by the presence of stool that may mimic an endoluminal mass lesion inside the colon in the region of ileocecalvalve (Figure 13), or alternatively by a lesion, either a tumor or a polyp, arising close the valve, which might be misinterpreted as the valve itself. In rare cases an appendiceal stump protruding into the cecum might simulate an ICV (Figure 14).
Conclusions
ICV is a normal structure, with several anatomical variants, possibly involved by different pathologic conditions, either neoplastic or inflammatory. Awareness of these different diagnostic possibilities is mandatory for radiologists evaluating CT Colonography datasets. Combined analysis of 2D axial and reformatted slices and 3D endouminal views provides the highest level of diagnostic accuracy.
References
Hara AK, Johnson CD, Reed JE, Ehman JE, Ilstrup DM (1996) Colorectal polyp detection with CT colography: two- versus three-dimensional techniques. Radiology 200:49–54
Dachman AH, Kuniyoshi JK, Boyle CM, et al. (1998) CT colonography with three-dimensional problem solving for detection of colonic polyps. AJR 171:989–995
Macari M, Milano A, Lavelle M, Berman P, Megibow AJ (2000) Comparison of time-efficient CT colonography with two- and three-dimensional colonic evaluation for detecting colorectal polyps. AJR 174:1543–1549
Hara AK, Johnson CD, Reed JE, et al. (1997) Detection of colorectal polyps with CT Colonography: initial assessment of sensitivity and specificity. Radiology 205:59–65
Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, Butler JA, Puckett ML, Hildebrandt HA, Wong RK, Nugent PA, Mysliwiec PA, Schindler WR (2003) Related articles, links computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults N Engl J Med 349(23):2191–2200
Fenlon HM, NUnes DP, Schroy PC III, Barish MA, Clarke PD, Ferrucci JT (1999) A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps. N Engl J Med 341:1496–1503
Yee J, Kumar NN, Hung R, Akerkar G, Kumar P, Wall S (2003) Comparison of supine and prone scanning separately and in combination at CT colonography. Radiology 226:653–661
Chen SC, Lu DSK, Hecht JR, Kedall BM (1999) CT colonography: value of scanning in both the supine and prone positions. AJR 172:595–599
Barish MA, Soto JA, Ferrucci JT (2005) Consensus on current clinical practice of virtual colonoscopy. AJR 184:786–792
Taylor SA, Laghi A, Lefere P, Halligan S, Stoker J (2006) European society of gastrointestinal and abdominal radiology (ESGAR): consensus statement on CT colonography. Eur Radiol 17(2):575
Lockart RD, Hamilton GF, Fyfe FW (1959) Large intestine. In: Lockart RD, Hamilton GF, Fyfe FW (eds) Anatomy of the human body. London: Faber and Faber, pp 524
Yitta S, Tatineny KC, Cipriani NA, Dachman AH (2006) Related articles, characterization of normal ileocecal valve density on CT colonography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 30(1):58–61
Fleischner FG, Bernstein C (1954) Roentgen-anatomical studies of the normal ileocecal valve Radiology 54:43–58
Regge D, Gallo TM, Nieddu G, Galatola G,Fracchia R, Neri E, Vagli P, Bartolozzi C (2005) Ileocecal valve imaging on computed tomographic colonographyn Abdom Imaging 30(1):20–25
Macari M, Megibow AJ (2001) Pitfalls of using three dimensional CT Colonography with two dimensional imaging correlation AJR 176:137–143
Burling D, Taylor SA, Halligan S, Gartner L, Paliwalla M Peiris C, Singh L, Bassett P, Bartram C (2006) Automated isufflation of carbon dioxide for MDCT colonography: distension and patient experience compared with manual insufflation. AJR 186(1):96–103
Iafrate F, Laghi A, Paolantonio P, et al. (2004) Colonic distension using meccanical CO2 insufflator versus manual air distension [Abstract]. Radiological Society of North America scientific assembly and annual meeting program. Oak Brook: Radiological Society of North America, p 432
Lasser EC, Rigler LG (1955) Ileocecal valve syndrome. Gastroenterology 28:1–16
Hinkel CL (1952) Roentgenological examination and evaluation of the ileocecal valve. AJR 68:171–182
El-Amin LC, Levine MS, Rubesin SE, et al. (2003) Ileocecal valve: spectrum of normal findings at double-contrast barium enema examination. Radiology 227:52–58
Berk RN, David GB, Cholhassey FB (1973) Lipomatosis of the ileocecal valve AJR 119:323–328
Yoruk G, Aksoz K, Buyrac Z, et al. (2004) Adenocarcinoma of the Ileocecal valve: Report of a case. Turk J Gastroenterol 15(4):268–269
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Spectrum of normal findings, anatomic variants and pathology of Ileocecal Valve: CT Colonography appearances and endoscopic correlation. A pictorial essay.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Iafrate, F., Rengo, M., Ferrari, R. et al. Spectrum of Normal Findings, Anatomic Variants and Pathology of Ileocecal Valve: CT Colonography Appearances and Endoscopic Correlation. Abdom Imaging 32, 589–595 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9198-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-007-9198-0