Abstract
Aim of this chapter is to describe the normal anatomy of the colon on the basis of 2D and 3D CT colonography criteria.
In normal colon the wall thickness is thin (less than 2 mm) and may increase to 5 mm in collapsed segments.
The colon is generally recognized by three morphologic key features, which can be clearly identified in CT colonography: the semilunar folds, the taeniae, and the haustra.
The normal colon typically is divided in antegrade order into six segments: the cecum with the ileocecal valve and the appendix, the ascending colon, the transverse colon, the descending colon, the sigmoid colon, and the rectum. The splenic and the hepatic flexure should not be considered separate segments.
The ileocecal valve has a variable appearance, being classified as either labial, when it appears as a slit-like opening; papillary, when its shape is dome-like; or intermediate.
Cases showing the normal colon anatomy are presented in the chapter.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Introduction
A fundamental prerequisite for radiologists aiming to read CT colonographic examinations is a thorough knowledge of the normal anatomy of the colon. Although the large bowel has been examined by radiologists for decades with barium studies, a CT colonographic evaluation may provide a different view of the colon [1–3]. Indeed, CT colonography is quite accurate for assessing the anatomy of the colon. However, the planar 2D approach to trace the gas-distended colon may result in new challenges for some readers, since the complex intraluminal anatomy of bowel loops and haustral folds may complicate the evaluation [4]. Moreover, some radiologists may not be familiar with the “intraluminal” perspective provided by an endoluminal 3D evaluation. Thus, a combined two-dimensional and three-dimensional imaging approach is considered the best practice for CT colonographic evaluation [5]. In this chapter the normal anatomy of the colon is described on the basis of 2D and 3D CT colonographic imaging criteria.
CT Colonography Morphology
General Two-Dimensional and Three-Dimensional CT Features of the Colonic Wall
Wall Thickness
In CT colonographic examinations, after colonic gas insufflation, the wall of the distended normal colon is very thin, measuring less than 2 mm [6]. Typically, it should be barely perceptible on 2D CT colonographic images and may be better depicted with abdominal window settings. In collapsed colonic segments, the colonic wall thickness increases physiologically to up to 5 mm or, in case of spasms, up to 8 mm (Fig. 1) [6]. The normal colonic wall itself has soft tissue attenuation on 2D CT colonographic images. It may show a slight enhancement after intravenous contrast media application. The colon is surrounded by fat tissue, which shows a homogeneous hypodense structure. On endoluminal 3D images, the normal colon presents with a smooth surface.
Morphologic Key Features of the Colon Wall
The colon is generally recognized by three morphologic key features, which can be identified on CT colonographic images: the semilunar folds, the taeniae, and the haustra (Fig. 1) [7].
The semilunar folds (plicae semilunares) are thin crescent-shaped structures. They are oriented orthogonally to the course of the colon and are located one after another in a row when passing through the coloni. Typically, the three rows of colonic folds are each separated by a taenia (see below).
On 2D CT colonographic images, normal semilunar folds are typically very thin and regular soft tissue structures. They are better recognized with wide window settings. On 3D endoluminal views, these folds are seen as crescent-shaped thin folds with a smooth surface. They can be thickened in regions of suboptimal colonic distention or form complex structures, especially at the inner parts of the flexures. The size and number of semicircular folds may vary individually and also within a single patient, due to the peristaltic activity of the colon.
The taeniae (taeniae coli) are three longitudinal muscular bands, which are formed from the longitudinal muscle layer of the colonic wall, each with a width of approximately 8 mm. They run along the length of the colon and are located on the anterior, dorsolateral, and dorsomedial wall section [8]. The three taeniae are most prominent in the transverse and ascending colon and, finally, coalesce at the cecum in the area of the appendiceal orifice. The taeniae are less prominent toward the descending and the sigmoid colon and disappear at the rectosigmoid junction.
Haustra are saccular outpouchings of the colonic wall, which are located in the spaces between the taeniae. The haustra are separated by the semilunar folds along the course of the colon. Haustra may vary in prominence due to the contraction of the taeniae and the peristaltic activity of the colon.
Segments of the Colon
The normal colon typically frames the abdomen. It is divided in antegrade order into six segments: the cecum with the ileocecal valve and the appendix, the ascending colon, the transverse colon, the descending colon, the sigmoid colon, and the rectum (Fig. 3). The splenic and the hepatic flexure are not considered separate segments [9].
The length and the diameter of the colon have been evaluated with CT colonography by Khasab et al. [10]. The mean total colonic length, evaluated in this study, was 189.5 cm with a range of 120–299 cm, with the transverse and sigmoid colon representing the longest and the cecum and rectum the shortest segments. The transverse diameter of the colon varied greatly. The cecum has the widest luminal diameter (7.6 cm), followed by the rectum (6.5 cm) and the ascending colon (6.1 cm). The sigmoid (3.5 cm) and descending colon (3.8 cm) have the narrowest luminal diameter [10]. Variations in the segmental or total length of the colon, as well as the length in the segmental location, are not uncommon. Some of these variations are clinically relevant. They are described in Chap. 2 (page 17, Rosa Bouzas).
The cecum is the first segment of the colon (Fig. 4). It is typically located in the right iliac fossa and represents a blind sac. At its base, the colonic taeniae converge and form the triradiate fold. Here, the appendiceal orifice can be seen on endoluminal 3D images as a small, well-circumscribed, round or oval depression of the colonic wall [1].
The ileocecal valve anatomically separates the cecum from the ascending colon (Fig. 5). It is located at the junction of the terminal ileum and the colon. The ileocecal valve is most commonly located on the medial side of the cecum, although anatomic variants exist. On 3D endoluminal images, the valve is typically shown with an upper lip and a lower lip [11]. The ileocecal valve has a variable appearance, being classified as either labial, when it appears as a slit-like opening, papillary, when its shape is dome-like, or intermediate. The orifice of the ileocecal valve can be seen as a tiny central depression [12]. Two-dimensional CT images demonstrate the connection of the terminal ileum to the valve. The ileocecal valve may have a wide range of attenuation values, with heterogeneous attenuation. It commonly contains fat tissue and is then referred to as a lipomatous ileocecal valve [13].
The ascending colon extends into the right abdomen and is located in the retroperitoneal compartment (Fig. 6). It has a triangular cross section, very similar to the transverse colon, but, typically, is greater in diameter. The semilunar folds may be slightly thicker than in the transverse colon.
The hepatic flexure connects the ascending colon with the transverse colon. It typically has a sharp angle (Fig. 7). The haustral folds at the inner part of colonic flexures and loops can fuse and form complex structures on 2D planar images, which are easily recognized, especially on endoluminal 3D displays [4].
The transverse colon extends in an intraperitoneal location from the hepatic to the splenic flexure (Fig. 8). It is the longest portion of the colon and can droop along its mesocolon into the pelvis. Therefore, it is relatively mobile. The transverse colon has a typical triangular cross section formed by the three taeniae. It typically has a distinct haustration.
The splenic flexure connects the transverse with the descending colon. It is located below the left diaphragm and is the highest point of the colon. The splenic flexure is often more tortuous than the hepatic flexure and contains, at worst, a series of complex twists (Fig. 9).
The descending colon extends into the left abdomen and is located within the retroperitoneal compartment. It is characterized by a straight, tubular shape, with a less triangular to oval cross section (Fig. 10). The haustration is less pronounced than in the proximal colonic segments.
The sigmoid colon normally lies within the pelvis and, ideally, has an S-shaped course connecting the descending colon with the rectum (Fig. 11). It is a relatively narrow, mobile, and tortuous segment of the colon with a typically round or oval cross section. The degree of haustration is variable. Due to its intraperitoneal location, there may be a considerable range of movement in the central portion.
The rectum is the most distal segment of the colon and has the second largest diameter (Fig. 12) [10]. The upper rectum begins intraperitoneally, but its distal two-thirds are located extraperitoneally. Typically, three distinct semilunar folds are found in the rectum (also referred as Houston’s valves or transverse folds). The middle fold, typically the largest one, is more often located at the right side of the rectum [14]. The rectum ends at the anorectal junction (anatomically “linea dentata”) and extends to the anal canal. At the anorectal junction, radiating folds are often observed, which are caused by the contraction of the anal sphincter muscles. The anal channel itself cannot be evaluated with CT colonography.
Case 1. Normal Wall Thickness of the Colon
Case 2. CT Morphologic Key Features of the Colon
Case 3. Six Segments of a Normal Colon
Case 4. Cecum: Triradiate Fold and Appendiceal Orifice
Case 5. Cecum: Normal Labial Ileocecal Valve
Case 6. Ascending Colon
Case 7. Right Flexure
Case 8. Transverse Colon
Case 9. Left Flexure
Case 10. Descending Colon
Case 11. Sigmoid Colon
Case 12. Rectum
References
Fenlon HM, Clarke PD, Ferrucci JT (1998) Virtual colonoscopy: imaging features with colonoscopic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170(5):1303–1309
Macari M, Megibow AJ (2001) Pitfalls of using three-dimensional CT colonography with two-dimensional imaging correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176(1):137–143
Silva AC, Wellnitz CV, Hara AK (2006) Three-dimensional virtual dissection at CT colonography: unraveling the colon to search for lesions. Radiographics 26(6):1669–1686
Mang T, Maier A, Plank C, Mueller-Mang C, Herold C, Schima W (2007) Pitfalls in multi-detector row CT colonography: a systematic approach. Radiographics 27(2):431–454
Neri E, Halligan S, Hellström M (2012) ESGAR CT Colonography Working Group. Eur Radiol. Sep 15. [Epub ahead of print] PMID: 22983280
Wiesner W, Mortele KJ, Ji H, Ros PR (2002) Normal colonic wall thickness at CT and its relation to colonic distension. J Comput Assist Tomogr 26(1):102–106
Mang T, Schima W (2009) CT-Kolonographie, 1st ed. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart
Horton KM, Corl FM, Fishman EK (2000) CT evaluation of the colon: inflammatory disease. Radiographics 20(2):399–418
Zalis ME, Barish MA, Choi JR et al (2005) CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology 236(1):3–9
Khashab MA, Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Rex DK (2009) Colorectal anatomy in adults at computed tomography colonography: normal distribution and the effect of age, sex, and body mass index. Endoscopy 41(8):674–678
Silva AC, Beaty SD, Hara AK et al (2007) Spectrum of normal and abnormal CT appearances of the ileocecal valve and cecum with endoscopic and surgical correlation. Radiographics 27(4):1039–1054
Iafrate F, Rengo M, Ferrari R, Paolantonio P, Celestre M, Laghi A (2007) Spectrum of normal findings, anatomic variants and pathology of ileocecal valve: CT colonography appearances and endoscopic correlation. Abdom Imaging 32(5):589–595
Regge D, Gallo TM, Nieddu G et al (2005) Ileocecal valve imaging on computed tomographic colonography. Abdom Imaging 30(1):20–25
Silva AC, Vens EA, Hara AK, Fletcher JG, Fidler JL, Johnson CD (2006) Evaluation of benign and malignant rectal lesions with CT colonography and endoscopic correlation. Radiographics 26(4):1085–1099
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mang, T., Böhm, G., Schima, W. (2013). Normal Colon. In: Neri, E., Faggioni, L., Bartolozzi, C. (eds) CT Colonography Atlas. Medical Radiology(). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11149-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11149-5_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-11148-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-11149-5
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)