Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis
Limitations of the existing treatment methods for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) have encouraged investigation of new therapeutic approaches in the field of regenerative medicine. Enabled by tissue engineering technology safety, feasibility and efficacy of ultrasound-guided intrasphincteric autologous myoblast implantation to treat SUI presented in the accompanying video were assessed in a pilot study of 38 women.
Methods
Following upper arm muscle biopsy, autologous myoblast suspension was injected into the extrinsic urethral sphincter under transurethral ultrasound visualization. Functional electrical stimulation (FES) was used postoperatively to possibly enhance cell integration. Objective and subjective parameters were compared at 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively.
Results
The tissue harvest, laboratory tissue processing, and myoblast implantation were successful in all 38 patients. No serious adverse events were reported through the course of the study. Objective and subjective measurements collected at baseline were significantly improved at 6 weeks postoperatively. Additional improvement or a plateau was observed at 3 and 6 months postoperatively, not being negatively influenced by discontinuation of FES. Of the patients, 23.7 % considered their SUI cured, and 52.6 % reported improvement at 6 months; 95 % would recommend this treatment to others.
Conclusions
Intrasphincteric ultrasound-guided autologous myoblast injection for SUI is feasible. This simple to perform and well-tolerated minimally invasive procedure safely produced promising initial results.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Aim of the video
The integrity of the extrinsic urethral sphincter, an omega-shaped striated muscle which compresses the urethra voluntarily, is necessary to maintain continence [1]. However, vaginal delivery, surgical injury, and aging may affect its morphologic and functional integrity [2]. Methods to treat stress urinary incontinence (SUI), a highly prevalent condition in women, have long existed, but their limitations have encouraged researchers to investigate new approaches, including those of tissue engineering, an emerging branch in the field of regenerative medicine, in order to preserve or improve tissue function. To avoid an ethical dilemma about embryonic stem cells, the search has concentrated on the potential use of autologous progenitor cells from adult tissues. We hereby present a video on ultrasound-guided intrasphincteric autologous myoblast implantation to treat SUI.
Methods
Study design
The study was approved by the National Medical Ethics Committee and National Agency for Medicinal Products and Medical Devices (registered at EU Clinical Trials database, EudraCT No. 2009-012389-30 and ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01355133). All procedures were conducted in accordance with the National Act on Quality and Safety of Human Tissues and Cells for Purposes of Medical Treatment. All women gave informed consent to participate. The study design was an academic, investigator-initiated, non-comparative, single center explorative clinical trial. Special emphasis was placed on safety and feasibility.
Patients
By September 2010, 38 women had been treated in a period of 1 year. Women aged 18–75 years (median 50 years) with primary symptoms of SUI, normal detrusor activity on filling cystogram, and bladder capacity of over 300 ml, who failed prior noninvasive treatment, were eligible. Major exclusion criteria were severe urethral hypermobility, defined as a 45° rotation of the proximal urethra and bladder neck during a Valsalva maneuver and detected by the movement of an inserted Q-tip, uterine or vaginal descensus (>stage I according to the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system), and previous anti-incontinence surgery.
Biopsy
First the participants underwent an open cut muscle biopsy under local anesthesia to obtain a small (∼0.5 cm3) muscle tissue portion from the upper arm of the nondominant hand. The biopsy was placed in transport medium and sent to a Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) certified institution (Innovacell Biotechnologie AG, Innsbruck, Austria) for myoblast isolation, cultivation, harvest, and storage.
Implantation
Patients underwent autologous myoblast implantation 5–14 weeks after the biopsy. In an operating theater a specially designed injection device (Sonoject, A.M.I., Feldkirch, Austria) with a rotating, high-frequency transurethral 8F ultrasound probe was inserted into the urethra to first visualize the extrinsic urethral sphincter and to precisely inject 2 ml of liquid myoblast suspension (1 × 106–5 × 107 cells) divided into 26 small depots of 50–100 μl each in two different levels of the sphincter. Upon completion of the implantation procedure, hypoechogenic spots were observed in the extrinsic urethral sphincter. The first 18 cases were performed under i.v. anesthesia and all subsequent cases under local lidocaine gel anesthesia with i.v. analgesia.
Functional electrical stimulation
Immediately following the myoblast implantation, the participants self-administered functional electrical stimulation (FES) transvaginally at home for 5 weeks to enhance cell integration [3]. The device used according to the manufacturer’s instructions was the contic+ (tic Medizintechnik, Dorsten, Germany). However, to ensure that any clinical improvement 6 weeks after the implantation would not be due to FES alone, the participants had previously undergone a first 5-week FES cycle, just after muscle tissue was harvested. The objective and subjective measurements obtained upon completion of each FES cycle were then compared [4] and further evaluated at 3 and 6 months following implantation.
Assessment
To ensure safety, vital signs and common laboratory values for urine and blood were monitored. Moreover, particular attention was paid to possible onset of complications of the muscle tissue harvest and myoblast implantation, such as surgical injury, local inflammation, urinary tract infection, pelvic pain, urinary retention, voiding dysfunction, de novo urgency, hyperplasia, and tumor formation. Physical examination, fixed bladder volume stress test result, pad test result, entries in the 3-day voiding diaries for urinary incontinence episodes (UIE) and for the amount of leaked urine during incontinence episodes measured semiquantitatively (UIS), degree of trouble living with SUI on a visual analog scale (VAS), score on the modified Patient Global Impression of Improvement scale (PGI-I), and score on the Incontinence Quality of Life questionnaire (I-QOL) were recorded at baseline, after completion of the first FES cycle that followed the muscle tissue harvest, 6 weeks after the myoblast implantation, after the second FES cycle was completed [4], 3 months, and 6 months following implantation.
Results
Thirty-eight women with a median age of 52 years, median parity of 2 (range 1–4), and mean body mass index (BMI) of 26.6 kg/m2 (SD ± 4.4) at baseline were treated.
All phases of the procedure were performed by a gynecologist. The first cases of biopsies were supervised by a plastic and reconstructive surgeon, whereas initial implantations were supervised regarding sphincter identification and depot positioning by a radiologist directly or indirectly through recordings overview. The mean duration of biopsy was 10 min and the mean duration for implantation 15 min. Cell harvest performed by the laboratory was successful in all of the patients.
No serious adverse events were reported throughout the course of the study. In terms of safety no declines from average regarding physical examination, lab values, or vital signs were detected, with the exceptions of one subject being referred to physiotherapy due to local transitory tenderness at the biopsy site at the time of the implantation and another two with acute cystitis at 6 weeks following implantation. The conditions all resolved with therapy. No postimplantation urinary retention was measured (defined as post-void residual urine volume greater than 50 ml), nor were there any cases of de novo urgency, hyperplasia, or tumors.
Compared with the objective and subjective measurements collected at baseline and after the preimplantation FES cycle, the corresponding measurements obtained 6 weeks following implantation, after the completion of a second FES cycle, indicated considerable improvement [4], which was later not negatively influenced by discontinuation of FES. Additional improvement or a plateau was observed at 3 and 6 months following implantation (Table 1). Of the patients, 9 (23.7 %) considered their SUI cured, and 20 (52.6 %) reported improvement at 6 months; 95 % would recommend this treatment to others.
Conclusion
Intrasphincteric ultrasound-guided autologous myoblast injection for SUI is feasible. This simple to perform and well-tolerated minimally invasive procedure safely produced promising initial results.
References
Macura KJ, Genadry RR (2008) Female urinary incontinence: pathophysiology, methods of evaluation and role of MR imaging. Abdom Imaging 33:371–380
Lifford KL, Townsend MK, Curhan GC et al (2008) The epidemiology of urinary incontinence in older women: incidence, progression, and remission. J Am Geriatr Soc 56:1191–1198
Bouchentouf M, Benabdallah BF, Mills P, Tremblay JP (2006) Exercise improves the success of myoblast transplantation in mdx mice. Neuromuscul Disord 16:518–529
Blaganje M, Lukanović A (2012) Intrasphincteric autologous myoblast injections with electrical stimulation for stress urinary incontinence. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 117:164–167
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by Innovacell Biotechnologie AG, Innsbruck, Austria for cell isolation, cultivation, and harvest.
Conflicts of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Blaganje, M., Lukanović, A. Ultrasound-guided autologous myoblast injections into the extrinsic urethral sphincter: tissue engineering for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Int Urogynecol J 24, 533–535 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1963-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-012-1963-0