Abstract
Interior structures including lattice, porous, or cellular structures have been widely used in geometric design for 3D printing. It can not only reduce the weight of objects but also adjust the physical properties, such as stress, balance, and center of mass. In this work, we present a novel method for buoyant equilibrium and optimization of the material distribution inside an object, such that the 3D printed object satisfies prescribed constraints of mass properties. In particular, we introduce a mathematical method to describe the internal structure compactly, and prove that this compact formulation generates density-variable lattice structures to control the mass properties precisely. Additionally, this internal structure has shown itself to be capable of self-supporting in 3D printing processing. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our mathematically based method for generating interior patterns in the applications of optimizing shapes that stably float in liquids, and in improving mechanical stiffness.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Umetani N, Bickel B, Matusik W (2015) Computational tools for 3D printing. SIGGRAPH Courses 9 p 1
Nowacki H (2010) Five decades of computer-aided ship design. Comput Aided Des 42(11):956–969
Biran A, Pulido RL (2013) Ship hydrostatics and stability. Butterworth-Heinemann
Prévost R, Whiting E, Lefebvre S, Sorkine HO (2013) Make it stand: balancing shapes for 3D fabrication. ACM Trans Graph (TOG) 32(4):81
Bächer M, Whiting E, Bickel B, Sorkine HO (2014) Spin-it: optimizing moment of inertia for spinnable objects. ACM Trans Graph (TOG) 33(4):96
Lautrup B (2011) Physics of continuous matter: exotic and everyday phenomena in the macroscopic world. CRC press, Boca Raton
Strano G, Hao L, Everson RM, Evans KE (2013) A new approach to the design and optimisation of support structures in additive manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 66(9–12):1247–1254
Aremu AO, Maskery IA, Tuck CJ, Ashcroft IA, Wildman RD, Hague RJM (2016) Effects of net and solid skins on self-supporting lattice structures. Challenges Mech Time Depend Mater 2:83–89
Xie Y, Chen X (2017) Support-free interior carving for 3D printing. Vis Inform 1(1):9–15
Musialski P, Auzinger T, Birsak M, Ashcroft IA, Wildman RD, Hague RJM (2015) Reduced-order shape optimization using offset surfaces. ACM Trans Graph 34(4):102
Christiansen AN, Schmidt R, Bærentzen JA (2015) Automatic balancing of 3D models. Comput Aided Des 58:236–241
Wang L, Whiting E (2016) Buoyancy optimization for computational fabrication. Comput Graph Forum 35(2):49–58
Wu J, Kramer L, Westermann R (2016) Shape interior modeling and mass property optimization using ray-reps. Comput Graph 58:66–72
Prévost R, Bächer M, Jarosz W, Jarosz W, Sorkinehornung O (2016) Balancing 3D models with movable masses. Proceedings of the Vision, Modeling and Visualization Workshop, vol 7
Chen Y (2007) 3D texture mapping for rapid manufacturing. Comput Aided Des Appl 4(6):761–771
Wang W, Wang TY, Yang Z, Liu L, Tong X, Tong W, Deng J, Chen F, Liu X (2013) Cost-effective printing of 3D objects with skin-frame structures. ACM Trans Graph (TOG) 32(6):177
Lu L, Shaft A, Zhao H, Wei Y, Fan QN, Chen X, Savoye Y, Tu CH, Daniel CO, Chen BQ (2014) Build-to-last: strength to weight 3D printed objects. ACM Trans Graph (TOG) 33(4):97
Zhang X, Xia Y, Wang J, Yang Z, Tu C, Wang W (2015) Medial axis tree—an internal supporting structure for 3D printing. Comput Aided Geom Des 35:149–162
Li D, Dai N, Jiang X, Jiang X, Chen X (2016) Interior structural optimization based on the density-variable shape modeling of 3D printed objects. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83(9–12):1627–1635
Umetani N, Schmidt R (2013) Cross-sectional structural analysis for 3D printing optimization. SIGGRAPH Asia Technical Briefs 5:1–5:4
Zhang X, Le X, Panotopoulou A, Whiting E, Wang CC (2015) Perceptual models of preference in 3D printing direction. ACM Trans Graph (TOG) 34(6):215
Ezair B, Massarwi F, Elber G (2015) Orientation analysis of 3D objects toward minimal support volume in 3D-printing. Comput Graph 51:117–124
Vanek J, Galicia JAG, Benes B (2014) Clever support: efficient support structure generation for digital fabrication. Comput Graph Forum 33(5):117–125
Dumas J, Hergel J, Lefebvre S (2014) Bridging the gap: automated steady scaffoldings for 3D printing. ACM Trans Graph (TOG) 33(4):98
Chen X, Zhang H, Lin J, Hu R, Lu L, Huang QX, Chen B (2015) Dapper: decompose-and-pack for 3D printing. ACM Trans Graph 34(6):213
Song P, Deng B, Wang Z, Dong Z, Li W, Fu CW, Liu L (2016) CofiFab: coarse-to-fine fabrication of large 3D objects. ACM Trans Graph (TOG) 35(4):45
Vouga E, Höbinger M, Wallner J, Pottmann H (2012) Design of self-supporting surfaces. ACM Trans Graph (TOG) 31(4):87
Deuss M, Panozzo D, Whiting E, Liu Y, Block P, Sorkinehornung O, Pauly M (2014) Assembling self-supporting structures. ACM Trans Graph (TOG) 33(6):214
Miki M, Igarashi T, Block P (2015) Parametric self-supporting surfaces via direct computation of airy stress functions. ACM Trans Graph (TOG) 34(4):89
Wu J, Wang CC, Zhang X, Westermann R (2016) Self-supporting rhombic infill structures for additive manufacturing. Comput Aided Des 80:32–42
Ohtake Y, Belyaev A, Alexa M, Turk G, Seidel HP (2005) Multi-level partition of unity implicits. ACM Siggraph 2005 Courses p 173
Abueidda DW, Dalaq AS, Al-Rub RKA, Younes HA (2015) Finite element predictions of effective multifunctional properties of interpenetrating phase composites with novel triply periodic solid shell architectured reinforcements. Int J Mech Sci 92:80–89
Lee W, Kang DY, Song J, Moon JH, Kim D (2016) Controlled unusual stiffness of mechanical metamaterials. Sci Rep 6
Scherer MRJ (2013) Gyroid and Gyroid-Like Surfaces. Double-Gyroid-Structured Functional Materials, pp 7–19
Roberts AP, Garboczi EJ (2001) Elastic moduli of model random three-dimensional closed-cell cellular solids. Acta Mater 49(2):189–197
Choren JA, Heinrich SM, Silver-Thorn MB (2013) Young’s modulus and volume porosity relationships for additive manufacturing applications. J Mater Sci 48(15):5103–5112
Khaderi SN, Deshpande VS, Fleck NA (2014) The stiffness and strength of the gyroid lattice. Int J Solids Struct 51(23):3866–3877
Yamanaka D, Suzuki H, Ohtake Y (2014) Density aware shape modeling to control mass properties of 3D printed objects. ACM SIGGRAPH Asia 2014 Technical Briefs p 7
Bonnans JF, Gilbert JC, Lemaréchal C, Sagastizábal CA (2013) Numerical optimization: theoretical and practical aspects. Springer Science & Business Media
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51775273); Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China (No. BK20161487); Six Talent Peaks Project in Jiangsu Province, China (No. GDZB-034); Aeronautical Science Foundation of China (No. 2015162024); Postgraduate Research and Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. KYKX16_0320).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Li, D., Dai, N., Zhou, X. et al. Self-supporting interior structures modeling for buoyancy optimization of computational fabrication. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 95, 825–834 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-1261-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-1261-6