Abstract
The aim of the study was to investigate petroleum waste remediation and toxicity reduction by five bacterial strains: Ralstonia picketti SRS (BP-20), Alcaligenes piechaudii SRS (CZOR L-1B), Bacillus subtilis (I′-1a), Bacillus sp. (T-1), and Bacillus sp. (T′-1), previously isolated from petroleum-contaminated soils. Petroleum hydrocarbons were significantly degraded (91%) by the mixed bacterial cultures in 30 days (reaching up to 29% in the first 72 h). Similarly, the toxicity of the biodegraded petroleum waste decreased 3-fold after 30 days. This work shows the influence of bacteria on hydrocarbon degradation and associated toxicity, and its dependence on the specific microorganisms present. The ability of these mixed cultures to degrade hydrocarbons and reduce toxicity makes them candidates for environmental restoration applications at other hydrocarbon-contaminated environments.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Numerous genera of bacteria are known as good hydrocarbon degraders. Most of them belong to Pseudomonas, Sphingomonas, Aeromonas, Alcaligenes, Acinetobacter, Arthobacter, Brevibacterium, Xanthomonas, Mycobacterium, Rhodococcus and Bacillus species (Atlas 1984; Bartha 1986). They tolerate high concentrations of the hydrocarbons and have a high degradation capability. It is now generally accepted that a single species of microorganism will not completely degrade any particular oil. The degradation of crude and refined oils seems to involve a consortium of microorganisms (Berry et al. 2006). Many microorganisms which are involved in crude and refined oils produce surface active compounds (biosurfactants) (Plaza et al. 2007). In recent years, the interest in microbial surfactants (biosurfactants) has increased due to their diversity, selectivity, performance under extreme conditions and potential applications in environmental protection.
In order to develop environmental technologies for crude oil degradation it is necessary to isolate and characterize specific microbial species for evaluation of their efficacy in utilization of hydrocarbons at the bench scale before field applications. Extensive work has been carried out on laboratory and field scale on the isolation of biosurfactant-producers and hydrocarbon degraders, characterization of the biosurfactants produced, and the products of biodegradation of hydrophobic compounds in soils and sediments (Bodour and Maier 2002; Christofi and Ivshina 2002; Li et al. 2006; Benincasa 2007).
The assessment of environmental hazards of remediated environments is generally based on chemical analyses. In these investigations the analyses are typically based on the site-specific contaminants of concern (COCs). However, not all COCs may be known and undetected metabolites, compounds and by-products may be formed during the degradation processes. There is increasing interest for incorporation of toxicity tests (with a battery of different assays) for ecological assessment and for supporting management decisions for remediation (Plaza et al. 2005). The use of biological endpoints help to appropriately define acceptable cleanup standards of contaminated sites and establish the ecological soil quality assessment (Fent 2003; Breure et al. 2005; Winding et al. 2005).
Detection of residual toxicity remaining after biodegradation underscores the need to test for toxicity changes during biodegradation studies. The occurrence of contaminants in mixture like crude oil is an important problem because the removal or degradation of one component can be inhibited by other compounds or by-products in the mixture, and because different conditions may be required to treat different compounds within the mixture. Bioassays provide important information for the assessment of pollutant effects. In contrast to chemical analyses, they detect effects of multiple contaminants, by-products, metabolites, and synergistic processes. A large number of bioassays have been applied for the evaluation of bioremediation efficacy (Eisentraeger et al. 2005; Maila and Cloete 2005). Toxicity of petroleum contaminated soils, water, and sediment undergoing remediation can be a health concern due to genotoxic by-products (Płaza et al. 2005).
This paper focuses on (i) the influence of bioaugmentation by bacteria isolated from petroleum contaminated soils were tested as a consortium for their ability to degrade petroleum in wastewater, (ii) the growth of the bacteria on the waste, and (iii) the effects of the biodegradation on toxicity as measured by assays carried out with the bioaugmentation tests.
Materials and Methods
The bacterial strains (BP-20, CZOR L-1B, T-1, T′-1, I′-1a) used in this study were isolated from a 100-year-old oil refinery sludge in Czechowice-Dziedzice, Poland as described by Berry et al. (2006). The aged sludge was acidic (pH 2) and highly contaminated with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. The isolates were selected based on their ability to produce biosurfactant and degrade of aliphatic and aromatic petroleum hydrocarbons as reported earlier (Płaza et al. 2006, 2007). Strains were maintained on nutrient agar (SMA, bioMerieux) slants and subcultured every 3 weeks.
The bacterial isolates were identified based on the 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis. A direct-colony PCR was set up to amplify the 16S rRNA gene in a 30-cylce PCR using universal primers 27F and 1492R. The PCR conditions used were: initial denaturation at 95°C for 8 min; 30 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 1 min, annealing at 55°C for 1 min and elongation at 72°C for 1 min; followed by final elongation step at 72°C for 10 min. The amplified PCR products were purified using the Qiagen-PCR purification kit as per the manufacturer’s instructions. The purified PCR products were sequenced from both ends at the DNA Sequencing Core facility of the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor. The 16S rRNA gene sequences were analysed at the Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) II (http://rdp.cme.msu.edu). The top 10 most homologous sequences were aligned using the CLUSTALW program v1.83 at the European Bioinformatics site (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/clustalw). The similarity matrix was prepared using the DNAdist program in the PHYLIP package (Felsenstein 1989) with the Jukes Cantor corrections. Isolates were identified as that genus/species to which they showed highest 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity in the RDP database. The characterization of the bacterial isolates was also carried out by traditional microbiological methods.
The raw petroleum-containing wastewater for experiments with the isolates was obtained from the Czechowice-Dziedzice oil refinery (CzOR), Poland. No treatments were done before the sampling of the wastewaters. Physicochemical and microbiological characterization of the wastewaters included the following: pH-7.4, BOD-155 g/m3, COD-275 g/m3, oxygen consumption-64 g/m3, TPH-802 g/m3, number of mesophilic bacteria-945 CFU/mL, number of psychrophilic bacteria-2730 CFU/mL, total number of fungi-102 propagules/mL.
To evaluate of the growth of bacterial strains on petroleum waste, 500 μL of 24 h cultures of each strain (104–105 CFU/mL) growing on liquid medium contained (g/L): peptone – 8; yeast extract – 2.5; glucose – 1 were transferred aseptically to 100 mL of combined petroleum wastewater and mineral medium (1:1 v/v). Composition of mineral medium (MM) was as described by Abu-Ruwaida et al. 1991 (g/L): Na2HPO4 – 2.2; KH2PO4 – 1.4; MgSO4·7H2O – 0.6; (NH4)2SO4 – 3; yeast extract – 1; NaCl – 0.05; CaCl2·7H2O – 0.02; FeSO4·7H2O – 0.01. The medium was supplemented with 1 mL of the trace elements solution (Gerhardt 1981) (mg/L): ZnSO4·7H2O – 50; MnCl2·4H2O – 400; CoCl2·6H2O – 1; CuSO4·5H2O – 0.4; H3BO2 – 2; Na2MoO4·2H2O – 500. The cultures were grown aerobically at 30°C for 7 days with constant shaking (150 rpm). Total viable counts (CFU/mL) were determined to monitor aerobic bacterial growth. The experiments were carried out using three replicates.
The biodegradation of petroleum waste by the bacterial consortium was tested by adding the consortia to a wastewater and mineral media solution in microcosms. The microcosms were developed with 1 mL of bacterial strain consortia, initial concentrations 104–105 CFU/mL, aseptically transferred to 250 mL Erlenmayer flasks (five replicates) containing 50 mL each of sterile MM and petroleum waste contained 1.9 mg TPH/mL. The microcosms were incubated at 30°C with continuous shaking (150 rpm) for 30 days. An uninoculated microcosm with petroleum wastewater and mineral medium served as a control. Samples were aseptically taken at 0, 3, 8, 15, 20 and 30 days interval for both total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) analysis and toxicity assays. The residual TPH was extracted with CCl4 from the liquid cultures and analysed by FT-IR after passing the extract through a Florisil column. The extract was quantitatively measured after calibration with a standard mixture (v/v) of n-hexadecane (37.5%), isooctane (37.5%) and benzene (25%). The spectrum was recorded between the 3,100–2,800 cm−1 range. The absorbance value was measured at 2,926 cm−1 with an IR spectrophotometer (UNICAM SP1000, UK). The TPH content was related to the CH2 group number.
Microtox® toxicity assay (SDI Europe) was carried out on microcosm samples following the basic test protocol (Microbics Corporation 1998). The assay is based on the analysis of light emission reduction of luminescent bacteria (Vibrio fischeri) under toxic stress and was carried out in triplicates on a Microtox Model 500 Analyzer as per the manufacturer’s instructions. The luminescence inhibition after 15 min exposure was taken as endpoint. The obtained data was used to calculate EC50 (concentration effect causing 50% toxic effect) and TU (toxicity unit = 1/EC50 × 100).
Statistical analysis of the results was performed using STATISTICA 5.1 a Windows program.
Results and Discussion
The five bacterial strains were identified as: Ralstonia picketti SRS (BP-20), Alcaligenes piechaudii SRS (CZOR L-1B), Bacillus subtilis (I′-1a), Bacillus sp. (T-1), Bacillus sp. (T′-1). 16S rRNA gene sequencing could not clearly assign isolates T-1 and T′-1 to any species in the genus Bacillus as both these isolates showed >99% similarity to two distinct species of the genus (B. subtilis and B. licheniformis for T-1 and B. subtilis and B. amyloliquefaciens for T′-1). The bacteria were isolated from sludge samples obtained from 100-year-old oil refinery in Czechowice-Dziedzice (Poland).
Figure 1 presents the growth of mixture bacterial cultures in the petroleum wastewater microcosms for 9 days. The consortium achieved maximum growth in the second day of the incubation. During the next days of the experiment duration the growth of bacterial consortium stabilized at 11–12 log CFU/mL (Fig. 1).
The degradation of petroleum waste as measured by total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) was determined over 30 days (Fig. 2). The bacterial consortium effectively degraded the petroleum waste as demonstrated by the 10-fold reduction in TPH (Fig. 2 and Table 1). The TPH concentration in petroleum waste was 1.9 mg/mL at the beginning which decreased to 0.17 mg/mL (91% of TPH removal) after 30 days of incubation. In the first 3 days of microcosm incubation TPH decrease was the highest, and reached ∼29% removal. The rapid increase in bacteria densities during the first days of microcosm incubation was correlated with high degradation of petroleum hydrocarbons (Figs. 1, 2). Bacterial strains used in the experiment had the ability to remediate the hydrocarbons under these test conditions. Control flasks with no microbial amendments showed no significant changes in TPH over 30 days.
The changes of toxicity as a function of petroleum biodegradation activity were also determined over 30 days (Table 1). At the beginning, the toxicity indicator Toxicity Units (TU) was high (14.2) which decreased by ∼43% to 8.07 in three days and reaching 33% of the original (4.55) toxicity by 30 days. This decrease was due to the efficient conversion of the toxic raw-petroleum material to less or non-toxic intermediates and by-products during biodegradation. Detection of this activity or decrease in residual after biodegradation underscores the need to test for toxicity changes during environmental restoration studies.
It has been demonstrated that ecotoxicity bioassays should be used as supplementary tools for monitoring the effectiveness of remediating petroleum contaminated sites (Płaza et al. 2005). In this way ecological relevant criteria for estimating risk assessment can be combined with monitoring data.
There are many ecotoxicity tests with varying sensitivities and applications, however short-term assays are often required to offer a fast and simple responses. In this context, Microtox® toxicity assay using the luminescent bacteria, Vibrio fischeri as test organism seems to be an effective tool in detecting toxicity, and has been used as a toxicity surveillance system in many specific cases. This method has been undergoing with large applications (DeZwart and Sloof 1983; Nohava et al. 1995; Froehner et al. 2000; Araujo et al. 2005). In presented study, Microtox® was used to evaluate the residual toxicity of the petroleum waste during the biodegradation.
The ability to simultaneously degrade petroleum compounds and reduce toxicity makes the investigated strains potential candidates for bioremediation. The major bacterial genera reported previously as biosurfactant producers include Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, Bacillus, Rhodococcus, Arthobacter, Staphylococcus and Flavobacterium species (Banat et al. 2000; Bodour and Maier 2002; Ron and Rosenberg 2002; Singh and Cameotra 2004). The present study investigated the bacterial isolates from a hydrocarbon-contaminated site belonging to the genus Ralstonia, Alcaligenes and Bacillus. The isolates Ralstonia picketti SRS and Alcaligenes piechaudii SRS, their surface active and biodegradation properties were described previously (Płaza et al. 2006, 2007). The capacity of these natural bacterial strains to produce biosurfactants and degrade petroleum hydrocarbons is promising for environmental restoration applications. The potential application of these cultures in conjunction with other methods including biopiles or bioreactors could be of great use and benefit to remediation efforts and in reducing long-term restoration costs.
References
Abu-Ruwaida AS, Banat IM, Haditirto S, Salem A, Kadri M (1991) Isolation of biosurfactant-producing bacteria. Product characterization and evaluation. Acta Biotechnol 11:315–324
Araujo CVM, Nascimento RB, Oliveira CA, Strotmann UJ, Silva EM (2005) The use of Microtox to assess toxicity removal of industrial effluents from the industrial district of Camacari (BA, Brazil). Chemosphere 58:1277–1281
Atlas RM (1984) Petroleum microbiology. McGraw-Hill, New York
Banat IM, Makkar RS, Cameotra SS (2000) Potential commercial applications of microbial surfactants. Appl Microbiol Biotech 53:495–508
Bartha R (1986) Biotechnology of petroleum pollutant biodegradation. Microbial Ecol 12: 155–172
Benincasa M (2007) Rhamnolipid produced from agro industrial wastes enhances hydrocarbon biodegradation in contaminated soil. Curr Microbiol 54:445–449
Berry CJ, Story S, Altman DJ, Upchurch R, Whitman W, Singleton D, Płaza G, Brigmon RL (2006) Biological treatment of petroleum in radiologically contaminated soil. In: Clayton J. Clark II, Angela Stephenson Lindner (eds) Remediation of hazardous waste in the subsurface. Bridging flask and field. American Chemical Society, Washington, DC, p 87
Bodour AA, Maier RM (2002) Biosurfactants: types, screening methods and application. In: Encyclopedia of environmental microbiology, 2nd edn, vol 2. Wiley, NY, p 750
Breure AM, Mulder C, Rombke J, Ruf A (2005) Ecological classification and assessment concepts in soil protection. Ecotoxicol Environ Safety 62:211–229
Christofi N, Ivshina IB (2002) Microbial surfactants and their use in field studies of soil remediation. J Appl Microbiol 93:915–936
De Zwart D, Slooff W (1983) The Microtox as an alternative assay in the acute toxicity assessment of water pollutants. Aquatic Toxicol 4:129–138
Eisentraeger A, Hund-Rinke K, Roembke J (2005) Assessment of ecotoxicity of contaminated soil using bioassays. In: Margesin R, Schinner F (eds) Manual of soil analysis; Monitoring and assessing soil bioremediation, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, p 321
Felsenstein J (1989) PHYLIP- phylogeny inference package (version 3.2). Cladistics 5: 387–395
Fent K (2003) Ecotoxicological problems associated with contaminated sites. Toxicol Letters 140–141: 353–365
Froehmer K, Backhaus T, Grimme LH (2000) Bioassays with Vibrio fischeri for the assessment of delayed toxicity. Chemosphere 40: 821–828
Gerhardt P (1981) Manual of Methods for General Bacteriology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DC 2006
Li Yu-yuing, Zeng Xi-lai, Li Bing (2006) Influence of biosurfactant on the diesel oil remediation in soil water system. J Environ Sci 18:587–590
Maila MP, Cloete TE (2005) The use of biological activities to monitor the removal of fuel contaminants-perspective for monitoring hydrocarbon contamination: a review. Inter Biodeterior Biodegrad 55:1–15
Nohava M, Vogel WR, Gaugitsch H (1995) Evaluation of the luminescent bacteria bioassay for the estimation of the toxicological potential of effluent water samples-comparison with data from chemical analyses. Environ Int 21:33–37
Płaza G, Nałecz-Jawecki G, Ulfig K, Brigmon RL (2005) Assessment of genotoxic activity of petroleum hydrocarbon-bioremediated soil. Ecotoxicol Environ Safety 62:415–420
Płaza G, Zjawiony I, Banat IM (2006) Use of different methods for detection of thermophilic biosurfactant-producing bacteria from hydrocarbon-contaminated and bioremediated soils. J Petrol Sc Eng 50:71–77
Płaza G, Wypych J, Berry C, Brigmon R L (2007) Utilization of monocyclic aromatic hydrocarbons individually and in mixture by bacteria isolated from petroleum-contaminated soil. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 23:533–542
Ron EZ, Rosenberg E (2002) Biosurfactants and oil bioremediation. Curr Op Biotechnol 13:249–252
Singh P, Cameotra SS (2004) Enhancement of metal bioremediation by use of microbial surfactants. Bioch Bioph Res Commun 319:291–297
Winding A, Hund-Rinke K, Rutgers M (2005) The use of microorganisms in ecological soil classification and assessment concepts. Ecotoxicol Environ Safety 62:230–248
Acknowledgments
This paper was prepared in connection with work done under the project No 3 TO9D 029 29 from the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education. Dr. Jangid is currently supported by research grant from the USDA to Prof. William B Whitman at the Department of Microbiology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia USA. This paper was prepared in connection with work done under a subcontract to Contract No. DE-AC09-76SR00001 with the U.S. Department of Energy.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Płaza, G.A., Jangid, K., Łukasik, K. et al. Reduction of Petroleum Hydrocarbons and Toxicity in Refinery Wastewater by Bioremediation. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 81, 329–333 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-008-9411-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-008-9411-z