Abstract
This article introduces the quantitative analysis of choice behavior by describing a number of equations developed over the years to describe the relation between the allocation of behavior under concurrent schedules of reinforcement and the consequences received for alternative responses. Direct proportionality between rate of responding and rate of reinforcement was observed in early studies, suggesting that behavioral output matched environmental input in a mathematical sense. This relation is termed “strict matching,” and the equation that describes it is referred to as “the matching law.” Later data showed systematic departures from strict matching, and a generalized version of the matching equation is now used to describe such data. This equation, referred to as “the generalized matching equation,” also describes data that follow strict matching. It has become convention to refer to either of these equations as “the matching law.” Empirical support for the matching law is briefly summarized, as is the applied and practical significance of matching analyses.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
ALFERINK, L. A., CRITCHFIELD, T. S., HITT, J. L., & HIGGINS, W. J. (2009). Generality of the matching law as a descriptor of shot selection in basketball. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42, 595–608.
BAUM, W. M. (1974). On two types of deviation from the matching law: Bias and undermatching. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 22, 231–242.
BAUM, W. M. (1979). Matching, undermatching, and overmatching in studies of choice. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 32, 269–281.
BAUM, W. M., & KRAFT, J. R. (1998). Group choice: Competition, travel, and the ideal free distribution. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 69, 227–245.
BLAKELY, E., STARIN, S., & POLING, A. (1988). Human performance under sequences of fixed-ratio schedules: Effects of ratio size and magnitude of reinforcement. Psychological Record, 38, 111–120.
BORRERO, J. C., CRISOLO, S. S., TU, Q., RIELAND, W. A., ROSS, N. A., FRANCISCO, M. T., & YANAMOTO, K. Y. (2007). An application of the matching law to social dynamics. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 40, 589–601.
BORRERO, J. C., & VOLLMER, T. R. (2002). An application of the matching law to severe problem behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35, 13–27.
BRADSHAW, C. M., & SZABADI, E. (1988). Quantitative analysis of human operant behavior. In G. Davey & C. Cullen (Eds.), Human operant conditioning and behavior modification (pp. 225–259). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
DAVISON, M., & MCCARTHY, D. (1988). The matching law: A research review. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
DEVILLIERS, P. A. (1977). Choice and a quantitative formulation of the law of effect. In W. K. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior (pp. 233–287). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
ELLIOTT, A., MORGAN, K., FUQUA, R., EHRHARDT, K., & POLING, A. (2005). Self- and cross-citation in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (Jaba) and the Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior (JEAB): 1993 through 2003. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 38, 559–563.
FOSTER, T. M., TEMPLE, W., & POLING, A. (1998). Behavior analysis and farm animal welfare. The Behavior Analyst, 20, 87–95.
G, C. R., KING, A. P., GOTTLIEB, D., BALCI, F., PAPACHRISTOS, E.B., SZALECKI, M. & CARBONE, K. S. (2007). Is matching innate? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 87, 161–199.
HALL-JOHNSON, E., & POLING, A. (1984). Preference in pigeons given a choice between sequences of fixed-ratio schedules: Effects of ratio values and duration of food delivery. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42, 127–135.
HERRNSTEIN, R. J. (1961). Relative and absolute strength of response as function of frequency of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 267–272.
HERRNSTEIN, R. J. (1970). On the law of effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 243–266.
MAZUR, J. E. (1991). Choice. In I. H. Iverson & K. A. Lattal (Eds.), Experimental analysis of behavior (Part 1, pp. 219–250). Amsterdam: Elsvier.
MCADIE, T. E., FOSTER, T. M., TEMPLE, W., & MATTHEWS, L. R. (1996). Concurrent schedules: Quantifying the aversiveness of sounds. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 37–55.
MCDOWELL, J. J. (1981). On the validity and utility of Hernnstein’s hyperbola in applied behavior analysis. In C. M. Bradshaw, E. Szabadi, & C. F. Lowe (Eds.), Quantification of steady-state operant behavior (pp. 311–324). Amsterdam: Elsvier/North-Holland.
MCDOWELL, J. J. (1982). The importance of Herrnstein’s mathematical statement of the law of effect for behavior therapy. American Psychologist, 37, 771–779.
MCDOWELL, J. J. (1988). Matching theory in natural human environments. The Behavior Analyst, 11, 95–109.
MCDOWELL, J. J. (2005). On the classic and modern theories of matching. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 84, 111–127.
MYERSON, J., & HALE, S. (1984). Practical implications of the matching law. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 17, 377–380.
NEEF, N. A., MACE, F. C., SHEA, M. C., & SHADE, D. (1992). Effects of reinforcer rate and reinforcer quality on time allocation: Extensions of matching theory to educational settings. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 691–699.
NEEF, N., SHADE, D., & MILLER, M. S. (1994). Assessing influential dimensions of reinforcers on choice in student with severe emotional disturbances. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 575–583.
PIERCE, W. D., & EPLING, W. F. (1983). Choice, matching, and human behavior: A review of the literature. The Behavior Analyst, 6, 57–76.
POLING, A., ALLING, K., & FUQUA, R. W. (1994). Self- and cross-citation in the Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis (Jaba) and the Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior (JEAB): 1983 through 1992. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 27, 729–731.
POLING, A., & FOSTER, T. M. (1993). The matching law and organizational behavior management revisited. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 14, 83–97.
RAGOTZY, S., BLAKELY, E., & POLING, A. (1988). Self-control in mentally retarded adolescents: Choice as a function of amount and delay of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 49, 191–200.
REED, D., CRITCHFIELD, T. S., & MARTENS, B. (2006). The generalized matching law in elite sports competition: Football play calling as operant choice. Jour nal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 39, 281–297.
ROBINSON, J. K. (1992). Quantitative analyses of choice in rat and pigeon. The Psychological Record, 42, 437–445.
ROMANOWICH, P., BOURRET, J., & VOLLMER, T. R. (2007). Further analysis of the matching law to describe two- and three-point shot selection by professional basketball players. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 40, 311–315.
VOLLMER, T. R., & BOURRET, J. (2000). An application of the matching law to evaluate the allocation of two- and three-point shots by college basketball players. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 33, 137–150.
WEARDEN, J. H., & BURGESS, I. S. (1982). Matching since Baum (1979). Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 38, 339–348.
WILLIAMS, B. A. (1988). Reinforcement, choice, and response strength. In R. C. Atkinson, R. J. Herrnstein, G. Lindzey, & R. D. Luce (Eds.), Stevens’ handbook of experimental psychology: Vol. 2: Teaming and cognition (pp. 167–244). New York: Wiley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Portions of this manuscript are based on a prior introduction to matching by Poling and Foster (1993).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Poling, A., Edwards, T.L., Weeden, M. et al. The Matching Law. Psychol Rec 61, 313–322 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395762
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395762