Abstract
This article demonstrates that there is a role for behavior-analytic techniques in the area of farm animal welfare and provides examples of the kinds of work that can be done. Behavior-analytic procedures, specifically those used in the study of psychophysics, preference, and demand, can provide answers to three questions people concerned with the welfare of farm animals are likely to ask: What can the animals detect? What do they like and dislike? What will they work to attain or preserve? Such information certainly is necessary for making reasonable decisions about animal welfare, although it is not sufficient in and of itself.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Appleby, M. S., Hughes, E. O., & Elson, H. A. (1992). Poultry production systems: Behaviour, management and welfare. Oxford: C.A.B. International.
Baldwin, B. A. (1983). Operant conditioning in farm animals and its relevance to welfare. In D. Smidt (Ed.), Indicators relevant to farm animal welfare (pp. 117–120). The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
Baldwin, B. A., & Ingram, D. L. (1967). Behavioural thermoregulation in pigs. Physiology and Behavior, 2, 15–21.
Baldwin, B. A., & Ingram, D. L. (1968). Factors influencing behavioral thermoregulation in pigs. Physiology and Behavior, 3, 409–415.
Baum, W. M. (1974). On two types of deviation from the matching law: Bias and undermatching. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 22, 231–242.
Baum, W. M. (1979). Matching, undermatching and overmatching in studies of choice. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 32, 269–281.
Blough, D. S. (1966). The study of animal sensory processes by operant methods. In W. K. Honig (Ed.), Operant behavior: Areas of research and application (pp. 345–379). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Blough, D. S., & Blough, P. (1977). Animal psychophysics. In W. E. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior (pp. 514–539). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Brambell, F. W. R. (Chairman). (1965). Report of the technical committee to enquire into the welfare of animals kept under intensive husbandry systems. Command Paper 2836. London: H.M.S.O.
Davison, M. C., & McCarthy, D. (1988). The matching law: A research review. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Dawkins, M. S. (1977). Do hens suffer in battery cages? Environmental preference and welfare. Animal Behaviour, 25, 1034–1046.
Dawkins, M. S. (1982). Elusive concept of preferred group-size in domestic hens. Applied Animal Ethology, 8, 365–375.
Dawkins, M. S. (1983). The current status of preference tests in the assessment of animal welfare. In S. H. Baxter, M. R. Baxter, & J. A. C. McCormack (Eds.), Farm animal welfare and housing (pp. 20–26). The Hague: Martinus Nyhoff.
Dawkins, M. S. (1990). From an animal’s point of view: Motivation, fitness and animal welfare. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13, 1–61.
Dawkins, M. S., & Beardsley, T. (1986). Reinforcing properties of access to litter in hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 15, 351–364.
de Villiers, P. A. (1977). Choice in concurrent schedules and a quantitative formulation of the law of effect. In W. E. Honig & J. E. R. Staddon (Eds.), Handbook of operant behavior (pp. 233–287). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Duncan, I. J. H. (1978). The interpretation of preference tests in animal behaviour. Applied Animal Ethology, 4, 197–200.
Duncan, I. J. H. (1981). Animal rights—animal welfare: A scientist’s assessment. Poultry Science, 60, 489–499.
Duncan, I. J. H., & Kite, V. G. (1987). Some investigations into motivation in the domestic fowl. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 18, 387–388.
Faure, J.-M. (1986). Operant determination of the cage and feeder size preferences of the laying hen. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 15, 325–326.
Fischer, G. J. (1975). The behaviour of chickens. In E. S. E. Hafez (Ed.), The behaviour of domestic animals (pp. 454–489). London: Balliére Tindall.
Foster, T. M., Temple, W., Cameron, B., & Poling, A. (1997). Demand curves for food in hens: Similarity under fixed-ratio and progressive-ratio schedules. Behavioural Processes, 39, 177–185.
Foster, T. M., Temple, W., Nair, V., Robertson, B., & Poling, A. (1996). Concurrent-schedule performance of dairy cows: Persistent under-matching. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 57–80.
Fraser, A. F., & Broom, D. M. (1990). Farm animal behavior and welfare. London: Balliére Tindall.
Geller, E. S. (1991). Where’s the validity in social validity? Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 24, 353–358.
Hall, W. F. (1984). The behavior and welfare of farm animals. Minneapolis: Humane Information Services.
Hou, S., Boone, M. A., & Long, J. T. (1975). An electrophysiological study on the hearing and vocabulation in Gallus domesticus. Poultry Science, 52, 159–164.
Hughes, B. O., & Black, A. J. (1973). The preference of domestic hens for different types of battery cage floor. British Poultry Science, 65, 9–18.
Hursh, S. R. (1980). Economic concepts for the analysis of behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 34, 219–238.
Hursh, S. R. (1984). Behavioral economics. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42, 435–452.
Hursh, S. R. (1991). Behavioral economics of drug self-administration and drug abuse policy. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 377–393.
Hursh, S. R., Raslear, T. G., Bauman, R., & Black, H. (1989). The quantitative analysis of economic behavior with laboratory animals. In K. G. Gruneit & F. Olander (Eds.), Understanding economic behavior (Theory and Decision Library, Series A, Vol. 2, pp. 383–407). Boston: Kluwer Academic Press.
Hursh, S. R., & Winger, G. (1995). Normalized demand for drugs and other reinforcers. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 64, 373–384.
Kazdin, A. E. (1977). Assessing the clinical or applied significance of behavior change through social validation. Behavior Modification, 1, 427–453.
Kilgour, R. (1976). The contributions of psychology to a knowledge of farm animal behaviour. Applied Animal Ethology, 2, 197–205.
Kilgour, R., Foster, T. M., Temple, W., Matthews, L. R., & Bremner, K. J. (1991). Operant technology applied to solving farm animal problems. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 30, 141–166.
Kilgour, R., Matthews, L. R., Temple, W., & Foster, T. M. (1984). Using operant test results for decisions on cattle welfare. In W. F. Hall (Ed.), The behavior and welfare of farm animals (pp. 205–217). Minneapolis: Humane Information Services.
Klopfer, F. D., Kilgour, R., & Matthews, L. R. (1981). Paired comparison analysis of payabilities of twenty foods to dairy cows. Proceedings of the New Zealand Society of Animal Production, 41, 242–247.
Lindberg, A. C., & Nichol, C. J. (1996). Space and density effects on group size preferences in laying hens. British Poultry Science, 37, 709–721.
Mackenzie, J., Foster, T. M., & Temple, W. (1993). Sound avoidance by hens. Behavioural Processes, 38, 143–157.
Matthews, L. R. (1983). Measurement and scaling of food preferences in dairy cows. Unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Matthews, L. R., & Ladewig, J. (1994). Environmental requirements of pigs measured by behavioural demand functions. Animal Behaviour, 47, 713–719.
Matthews, L. R., & Temple, W. (1979). Concurrent schedule assessment of food preference in cows. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 32, 245–254.
McAdie, T. M., Foster, T. M., & Temple, W. (1996). Concurrent schedules: Quantifying the aversiveness of noise. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 37–55.
McAdie, T. M., Foster, T. M., Temple, W., & Matthews, L. R. (1993). A method for measuring the aversiveness of sounds to domestic hens. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 37, 223–238.
Robinson, D. (1993). Poultry welfare—or human debacle. Proceedings of the Ninth Australian Poultry and Feed Convention. Queensland, Australia: Australian Poultry Industries Association.
Skinner, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: Macmillan.
Skinner, B. F (1974). About behaviorism. New York: Knopf.
Temple, W. (1994). A review of research into the welfare of hens in various housing and management systems for egg production. Canberra, Australia: Working Group on Hen Housing.
Temple, W., & Foster, T. M. (1980). Applications of preference assessment in animal welfare. In M. Wodzicka-Tomaszewska, T. N. Edey, & J. J. Lynch (Eds.), Behaviour in relation to reproduction, management and welfare (pp. 191–193). 4th Review of Rural Science. New South Wales, Australia: University of New England.
Temple, W., Foster, T. M., & O’Donnell, C. S. (1984). Behavioural estimates of auditory thresholds in hens. British Poultry Science, 25, 487–493.
Walker, J. A. (1996). Concurrent schedules: A method for measuring social preferences of hens. Unpublished masters thesis, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Webster, A. J. F., & Nichol, C. J. (1988). The case for welfare. In Cages for the future (pp. 11–21). Cambridge: ADAS.
Wolf, M. M. (1978). Social validity: The case for subjective measurement or how applied behavior analysis is finding its heart. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 11, 203–215.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Foster, T.M., Temple, W. & Poling, A. Behavior Analysis and Farm Animal Welfare. BEHAV ANALYST 20, 87–95 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392766
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392766