Abstract
The distinction between operant and respondent behavior classes has received considerable attention throughout the history of behavior analysis. Some have contended that because operant and respondent processes share a number of similarities, the distinction should be dropped. Others, for lack of a better theoretical alternative, have supported the continued distinction. It is suggested that the failure of behavior analysts to recognize the ever-present role of respondent relations in operant conditioning experiments may be impeding the formulation of an effective explanation for stimulus equivalence, which has been investigated primarily as an operant phenomenon. Conceptual issues historically relevant to the operant-respondent distinction are discussed, and equivalence researchers are urged to consider the involvement of both classes of behavior in their analyses.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
BAER, D. M. (1996). On the invulnerability of behavior-analytic theory to biological research. The Behavior Analyst, 19, 83–84.
BARNES, D. (1994). Stimulus equivalence and relational frame theory. The Psychological Record, 44, 91–124.
BARNES, D. (1996). Naming as a technical term: Sacrificing behavior analysis at the altar of popularity? Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 264–266.
BARNES, D., & KEENAN, M. (1993). A transfer of functions through derived arbitrary and nonarbitrary stimulus relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 61–81.
BLACK, A. H., OSBORNE, B., & RISTOW, W. C. (1977). A note on the operant conditioning of autonomic responses. In H. Davis & H. M. B. Hurwitz (Eds.), Operant-Pavlovian interactions (pp. 27–39). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
BOWER, G., & GRUSEC, T. (1964). Effects of prior Pavlovian discrimination training upon learning an operant discrimination. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 7, 401–404.
BULLOCK, D. (1996). Toward a reconstructive understanding of behavior: A response to Reese. The Behavior Analyst, 19, 75–78.
CATANIA, A. C. (1992). Learning (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
CATANIA, A. C., HORNE, P., & LOWE, C. F. (1989). Transfer of function across members of an equivalence class. The Analysis of Verbal Behavior, 7, 99–110.
COLWILL, R. M., & RESCORLA, R. A. (1986). The psychology of learning and motivation, 20, 55–104.
CRAWFORD, L. L., HOLLOWAY, K. S., & DOMJAN, M. (1993). The nature of sexual reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 60, 55–66.
CUMMING, W. W., &, BERRYMAN, R. (1965). The complex discriminated operant: Studies of matching-to-sample and related problems. In D. I. Mostofsky (Ed.), Stimulus generalization (pp. 284–330). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
DAWSON, G. R., RUPNIAK, N. M. J., IVERSEN, S. D., & CURNOW, R. (1995). Lack of effect of Cck-sub (B) receptor antagonists in ethological and conditioned animal screens for anxiolytic drugs. Special Issue: Experimental models for the study of affective and anxiety disorders. Psychopharmocology, 121, 109–117.
DEVANY, J. M., HAYES, S. C., & NELSON, R. O. (1986). Equivalence class formation in language-able and language-disabled children. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 46, 243–257.
DINSMOOR, J. A. (1983). Observing and conditioned reinforcement. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6, 693–728.
DONAHOE, J. W. (1988). Skinner: The Darwin of ontogeny? In A. C. Catania & S. Harnad (Eds.), The selection of behavior: The operant behaviorism of B. F. Skinner: Comments and consequences (pp. 36–38). New York: Cambridge University Press.
DONAHOE, J. W. (1991). The selectionist approach to verbal behavior: Potential contributions of neuropsychology and connectionism. In L. J. Hayes & P N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior (pp. 119–145). Reno, NV: Context Press.
DONAHOE, J. W. (1996). On the relation between behavior analysis and biology. The Behavior Analyst, 19, 71–73.
DONAHOE, J. W., BURGOS, J. E., & PALMER, D. C. (1993). A selectionist approach to reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 60, 17–40.
DOUGHER, M. J.., AUGUSTSON, E. M., MARKHAM, M. R., GREENWAY, D. E., & WULFERT, E. (1994). The transfer of respondent eliciting and extinction functions through stimulus equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 62, 331–351.
DOUGHER, M. J., & MARKHAM, M. R. (1994). Stimulus equivalence, functional equivalence, and the transfer of function. In S. C. Hayes, L. J. Hayes, M. Sato, & K. Ono (Eds.), Behavior analysis of language and cognition (pp. 71–90). Reno, NV: Context Press.
DUGDALE, N., & LOWE, C. F. (1990). Naming and stimulus equivalence. In D. E. Blackman & H. Lejeune (Eds.), Behaviour analysis in theory and practice (pp. 115–138). Hove, England: Erlbaum.
ESTES, W. K. (1948). Discriminative conditioning. II. Effects of a Pavlovian conditioned stimulus upon a subsequently established operant response. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38, 173–177.
ESTES, W. K., & SKINNER, B. F. (1941). Some quantitative properties of anxiety. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 29, 390–400.
FERREIRA, S. H., GOLLUB, L. R., & VANE, J. R. (1969). The release of catecholamines by shocks and stimuli paired with shocks. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 12, 623–631.
FIELDS, L.., ADAMS, B. J., VERHAVE, T., & NEWMAN, S. (1990). The effects of nodality on the formation of equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 53, 345–358.
GATCH, M. B., & OSBORNE, J. G. (1989). Transfer of contextual stimulus function via equivalence class development. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 369–378.
GREENWAY, D. E., DOUGHER, M. J., & WULFERT, E. (1996). Transfer of consequential functions via stimulus equivalence: Generalization to different testing contexts. The Psychological Record, 46, 131–143.
HAYES, L. J. (1992). Equivalence as process. In S. C. Hayes & L. J. Hayes (Eds.), Understanding verbal relations (pp. 97–108). Reno, NV: Context Press.
HAYES, L. J. (1994). Thinking. In S. C. Hayes, Hayes, M. Sato, & K. Ono (Eds.), Behavior analysis of language and cognition (pp. 149–164). Reno, NV: Context Press.
HAYES, L. J.., ADAMS, M. A., & DIXON, M. R. (1997). Causal constructs and conceptual confusions. The Psychological Record, 47, 97–112.
HAYES, S. C. (1991). A relational control theory of stimulus equivalence. In L. J. Hayes & P. N. Chase (Eds.), Dialogues on verbal behavior (pp. 19–40). Reno, NV: Context Press.
HAYES, S. C. (1989). Nonhumans have not yet shown stimulus-equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 51, 385–392.
HAYES, S. C., KOHLENBERG, B. S., & HAYES, L. J. (1991). The transfer of specific and general consequential functions through simple and conditional equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56119–137.
HAYES, S. C., & WILSON, K. G. (1996). Criticisms of relational frame theory: Implications for a behavior analytic account of derived stimulus relations. The Psychological Record, 46, 231–236.
HERRNSTEIN, R. J. (1977). The evolution of behaviorism. American Psychologist, 32, 593–603.
HOLLAND, P. C. (1983). “Occasion-setting”: in Pavlovian featu re positive discriminations. In M. L. Commons, R. J. Herrnstein, & A. R. Wagner (Eds.), Quantitative analyses of behavior: Volume 4: Discrimination processes (pp. 183–206). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
HORNE, P. J., & LOWE, C. F. (1996). On the origins of naming and other symbolic behavior. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 185–242.
KAMIN, L. H. (1969). Predictability, surprise, attention, and conditioning. In B. A. Campbell & R. M. Church (Eds.), Punishment and aversive behavior (pp. 279–296). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
KIMBLE, G. A. (1961). Hilgard and Marquis’ conditioning and learning (2nd ed.). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
KOHLENBERG, B. S., HAYES, S. C., & HAYES, L. J. (1991). The transfer of contextual control over equivalence classes through equivalence classes: A possible model of social stereotyping. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 505–518.
KONORSKI, J., & MILLER, S. (1937a). On two types of conditioned reflex. Journal of General Psychology, 16, 264–272.
KONORSKI, J., & MILLER, S. (1937b). Further remarks on two types of conditioned reflex. Journal of General Psychology, 17, 405–407.
KURSE, J. M., OVERMIER, B., KONZ, W. A, & ROKKE, E. (1983). Pavlovian conditioned stimulus effects upon instrumental choice behavior are reinforcer specific. Learning and Motivation, 14, 165–181.
LEADER, G., BARNES, D., & SMEETS, P. M. (1996). Establishing equivalence relations using a respondent-type training procedure. The Psychological Record, 46, 685–706.
LOWE, C. F., & BEASTY, A. (1987). Language and the emergence of equivalence relations: A developmental study. Bulletin of the British Psychological Society, 40, A42.
LYNCH, D. C., & GREEN, G. (1991). Development and crossmodal transfer of contextual control of emergent stimulus relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 139–154.
MARKHAM, M. R., & DOUGHER, M. J. (1996). Compound stimuli in emergent stimulus relations: Extending the scope of stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 60, 529–542.
MOWRER, O. H. (1947). On the dual nature of learning — a re-interpretation of “conditioning” and “problem-solving.” Harvard Educational Review, 17, 102–148.
OVERMIER, J. B., & PAPINI, M. R. (1986). Factors modulating the effects of teleost telencephalon ablation on retention, relearning, and extinction of instrumental avoidance behavior. Behavioural Neuroscience, 100, 190–199.
PALLARES, M. A, NADAL, R. A, & FERRE, N. S. (1992). Effects of oral ethanol self-administration on the inhibition of the lever-press response in rats. Pharmacology, Biochemistry and Behavior, 43, 589–595.
PARKER, B. K., SERDIKOFF, S. L., KAMINSKI, B. J., & CRITCHFIELD, T. S. (1991). Stimulus control of Pavlovian facilitation. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 60, 55–66.
PEAR, J. J., & ELDRIGE, G. D. (1984). The operant-respondent distinction: Future directions. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42, 453–467.
POLING, A, & BYRNE, T. (1996). Reactions to Reese: Lord, let us laud and lament. The Behavior Analyst, 19, 79–82.
QUARTERMAIN, D., HAWXHURST, A., ERMITA, B., & PUENTE, J. (1993). Effect of the calcium channel blocker amlodipine on memory in mice. Behavioral and Neural Biology, 60, 211–219.
REESE, H. W. (1996). How is physiology relevant to behavior analysis? The Behavior Analyst, 1961–70.
REHFELDT, R. A., & HAYES, L. J. (May, 1997). Equivalence classes using complex samples: Some extensions of the blocking effect. Poster presented at the meeting of the Association for Behavior Analysis, Chicago, Illinois.
RESCORLA, R. A. (1988). Pavlovian conditioning: It’s not what you think it it is. American Psychologist, 43, 151–160.
RESCORLA, R. A., & HOLLAND, P. C. (1976). Some behavioral approaches to the study of learning. In M. R. Rosenzweig & E. L. Bennett (Eds.), Neural mechanisms of learning and memory (pp. 165–192). Cambridge, MA: The Mit Press.
RESCORLA, R. A., & S, R. L. (1967). Two-process learning theory: Relationships between Pavlovian conditioning and instrumental learning. Psychological Review, 74, 151–182.
RIBES, E. (1997). Causality and contingency: Some conceptual considerations. The Psychological Record, 47, 619–635.
SAUNDERS, K. J., & SPRADLIN, J. E. (1996). Naming and equivalence relations. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 304–308.
SAUNDERS, R. R., & GREEN, G. (1996). Naming is not (necessary for) stimulus equivalence. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 65, 312–314.
SCHLOSBERG, H. (1937). The relationship between success and the laws of conditioning. Psychological Review, 44, 379–394.
SCHOENFELD, W. N. (1976). The “response” in behavior theory. Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science, 11, 129–149.
SCHOENFELD, W. N. (1978). “Reinforcement” in behavior theory. Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science, 13, 135–144.
SHAPIRO, M. M. (1960). Respondent salivary conditioning during operant lever pressing in dogs. Science, 132, 619–620.
SHAPIRO, M. M. (1961). Salivary conditioning in dogs during fixed-interval reinforcement contingent upon lever pressing. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 4, 361–364.
SIDMAN, M. (1953). Avoidance conditioning with brief shock and no exteroceptive warning signal. Science, 118, 57–58.
SIDMAN, M. (1971). Reading and auditory-visual equivalences. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 14, 5–13.
SIDMAN, M. (1986). Functional analysis of emergent verbal classes. In T. Thompson & M. D. Zeiler (Eds.), Analysis and integration of behavioral units (pp. 213–245). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
SIDMAN, M. (1994). Equivalence relations and behavior: A itresearch story. Boston, MA: Authors Cooperative, Inc.
SIDMAN, M., & CRESSON, O. (1973). Reading and crossmodal transfer of stimulus equivalences in severe retardation. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 77, 515–523.
SIDMAN, M., CRESSON, O., Jr., & WILLSON-MORRIS, M. (1974). Acquisition of matching to sample via mediated transfer. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 22, 261–273.
SIDMAN, M., & Tailby, W. (1982). Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: An expansion of the testing paradigm. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 5–22.
SKINNER, B. F. (1935). Two types of conditioned reflex and a pseudo-type. The Journal of General Psychology, 12, 66–77.
SKINNER, B. F. (1937). Two types of conditioned reflex: A reply to Konorski and Miller. The Journal of General Psychology, 16, 272–279.
SKINNER, B. F. (1938). The behavior of organisms. Acton, MA: Copley Publishing Group.
SKINNER, B. F. (1945). The operational analysis of psychological terms. Psychological Review, 52, 270–277.
SKINNER, B. F. (1950). Are theories of learning necessary? Psychological Review, 57, 193–216.
SKINNER, B. F. (1953). Science and human behavior. New York: The Free Press.
SKINNER, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
SMEETS, P. M. (1991). Emergent simple discrimination in children: Transfer of stimulus control under non-reinforced conditions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43B, 361–388.
SMEETS, P. M., BARNES, D., SCHENK, J. J., & DARCHEVILLE, J. C. (1996). Emergent simple discriminations and conditional relations in children, intellectually impaired adults, and normal adults. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49B, 201–219.
STEELE, D., & HAYES, S. C. (1991). Stimulus equivalence and arbitrarily applicable relational responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 56, 519–555.
STROMER, R., MCILVANE, W. J., DUBE, W. V., & MACKAY, H. (1993). Assessing control by elements of complex stimuli in delayed matching to sample. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 83–102.
STROMER, R., MCILVANE, W. J., & SERNA, R. W. (1993). Complex stimulus control and equivalence. The Psychological Record, 43, 585–598.
STROMER, R., & STROMER, J. B. (1990a). The formation of arbitrary stimulus classes in matching to complex samples. The Psychological Record, 40, 51–66.
STROMER, R., & STROMER, J. B. (1990b). Matching to complex samples: Further study of arbitrary stimulus classes. The Psychological Record, 40, 505–516.
TERRACE, B. L. (1973). Classical conditioning. In J. A. Nevin & G. S. Reynolds (Eds.), The study of behavior: Learning, motivation, emotion, and instinct (pp. 71–112). Glenview, IL: Foresman & Co.
TRAPOLD, M. A, CARLSON, J. G., & MYERS, W. A (1965). The effect of noncontingent fixed- and variable-interval reinforcement upon subsequent acquisition of the fixed-interval scallop. Psychonomic Science, 2, 261–262.
WILLIAMS, B. A. (1975). The blocking of reinforcement control. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 24, 215–225.
WILLIAMS, B. A (1984). Stimulus control and associative learning. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42, 469–483.
WILLIAMS, D. R. (1965). Classical conditioning and incentive motivation. In W. F. Prokasy (Ed.), Classical conditioning. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
WULFERT, E., & HAYES, S. C. (1988). Transfer of a conditional ordering response through conditional equivalence classes. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 50, 125–144.
ZIELINKSI, K., WALASEK, G., WERKA, T., & WESIERSKA, M. (1993). Effects of partial lesion of dorsal hippocampal afferent and Gm1 ganglioside treatment on conditioned emotional response and hippocampal afferent markers in rats. Behavioural Brain Research, 55, 77–84.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rehfeldt, R.A., Hayes, L.J. The Operant-Respondent Distinction Revisited: Toward An Understanding Of Stimulus Equivalence. Psychol Rec 48, 187–210 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395266
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395266