Abstract
Conclusions drawn from research in the social sciences comparing the quality or quantity of performance under cooperation and competiton stress the advantages of cooperation. This generalization may be premature, however, because of the paucity of experimental analyses investigating variations in competitive conditions. Neglected in particular have been variables that affect reinforcement conditions among competitors. These include performance differences, the basis of reinforcement, reinforcer distribution, and stimuli that indicate the performances of other competitors. These variables provide the basis for a behavioral interpretation of performance under competition. The result is a clearer understanding of the options that are available in instituting competitive contingencies and the areas in which experimental analyses are needed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Breault, K. (1981). The modern psychophysical measurement of marginal utility: A return to introspective cardinality? Social Science Quarterly, 62, 672–684.
Buskist, W. F., Barry, A., Morgan, D., & Rossi, M. (1984). Competitive fixed interval performance in humans: Role of “orienting” instructions. The Psychological Record, 34, 241–257.
Church, R. M. (1962). Effect of relative skill on the amount of competitive facilitation. Psychological Reports, 11, 603–614.
Church, R. M. (1968). Applications of behavior theory to social psychology: Imitation and competition. In E. C. Simmel, R. A. Hoppe, & G. A. Milton (Eds.), Social facilitation and imitative behavior (pp. 135–167). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Church, R. M., Millward, R. B., & Miller, P. (1963). Prediction of success in a competitive reaction time situation. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 234–240.
Cohen, D. J. (1962). Justin and his peers: An experimental analysis of a child’s social world. Child Development, 33, 697–717.
Duvinsky, J. D., & Poppen, R. (1982). Human performance on conjunctive fixed-interval fixed-ratio schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 37, 243–250.
Ferster, C. B., & Skinner, B. F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Hake, D. F., & Olvera, D. (1978). Cooperation, competition and related social phenomena. In A. C. Catania & T. A. Brigham (Eds.), Handbook of applied behavior analysis: Social and institutional processes (pp. 208–245). New York: Irvington.
Hake, D. F., Olvera, D., & Bell, J. C. (1975). Switching from competition to sharing or cooperation at large response requirements: Competition requires more responding. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 24, 343–354.
Herrnstein, R. J. (1970). On the law of effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 13, 243–266.
Johnson, D. W., Maruyama, G., Johnson, R., Nelson, D., & Skon, L. (1981). Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 89, 47–62.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Maruyama, G. (1983). Interdependence and interpersonal attraction among heterogeneous and homogeneous individuals: A theoretical formulation and a metaanalysis of research. Review of Educational Research, 53, 5–54.
Lindsley, O. R. (1966). Experimental analysis of cooperation and competition. In T. Verhave (Ed.), The experimental analysis of behavior: Selected readings (pp. 470–501). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
Marwell, G., & Schmitt, D. R. (1975). Cooperation: An experimental analysis. New York: Academic Press.
Matthews, B. A. (1979). Effects of fixed and alternated payoff inequity on dyadic competition. The Psychological Record, 29, 329–339.
Miller, L. K., & Hamblin, R. L. (1963). Interdependence, differential rewarding, and productivity. American Sociological Review, 28, 768–778.
Molm, L. D. (1981). A contingency change analysis of the disruption and recovery of social exchange and cooperation. Social Forces, 59, 729–751.
Olvera, D. R., & Hake, D. F. (1976). Producing a change from competition to sharing: Effects of large and adjusting response requirements. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 26, 321–333.
Osborne, S. R. (1978). A quantitative analysis of the effects of amount of reinforcement on two response classes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Processes, 4, 297–317.
Rosenbaum, M. E. (1979). Cooperation and competition. In P. B. Paulus (Ed.), Psychology of group influence (pp. 291–331). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Schmitt, D. R. (1976). Some conditions affecting the choice to cooperate or compete. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 25, 165–178.
Schmitt, D. R. (1981). Performance under cooperation or competition. American Behavioral Scientist, 24, 649–679.
Schmitt, D. R. (1984). Interpersonal relations: Cooperation and competition. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 42, 377–383.
Seta, J. J. (1982). The impact of comparison processes on coactors’ task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 281–291.
Slavin, R. E. (1977). Classroom reward structure: An analytical and practical review. Review of Educational Research, 47, 633–650.
Slavin, R. E. (1983). When does cooperative learning increase student achievement? Psychological Bulletin, 94, 429–445.
Zeiler, M. D., & Buchman, I. B. (1979). Response requirements as constraints on output. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 32, 29–49.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
This work was supported in part by Grant SES-821437 from the National Science Foundation.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schmitt, D.R. Competition: Some Behavioral Issues. BEHAV ANALYST 9, 27–34 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391927
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03391927