Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of surgeon specialty interest on patient outcome after potentially curative colorectal cancer surgery

  • Original Contributions
  • Published:
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: There are significant differences in patient outcome after potentially curative surgery for colorectal cancer that relate to the surgeon performing the procedure. The reasons for these differences remain obscure. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of the surgeon's specialty on patient outcome after potentially curative colorectal cancer surgery and to identify factors that may help explain differences in outcome among specialty groups. METHODS: Between 1990 and 1993, 378 patients underwent potentially curative surgery for colorectal cancer by surgeons with different specialty interests, vascular or transplant, general, and colorectal surgeons, in a large teaching hospital. Information on operative details, including the length of the resection specimen, resection margins, whether the tumor was removed withen bloc resection of adjacent clinically involved organs, number of lymph nodes removed, and stage was collected. Factors affecting both local and overall recurrence rates were analyzed using logistic regression analysis at both univariate and multivariate levels. RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 45 months the only factors associated with a significantly reduced local recurrence rate were the length of the resection specimen (odds ratio, 0.56; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.31–0.99) and colorectal specialty (P=0.04). Patients operated on by a general surgeon were 3.42 times (95 percent confidence interval, 1.32–8.9) more likely to develop a local recurrence than those operated on by a colorectal surgeon. For overall recurrence, early stage disease (P<0.0001), absence of vascular invasion (0.005), and colorectal specialty (0.025) were the only factors associated with significantly improved outcome at multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: These data show that surgeons with an interest in colorectal cancer achieve lower local and overall recurrence rates compared with vascular or transplant or general surgeons. Differences in local recurrence rates seem to be predominantly related to the extent of resection performed and demonstrate the need to remove an adequate specimen when performing potentially curative colorectal cancer surgery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Phillips RK, Hittinger R, Blesovsky L, Fry JS, Fielding LP. Local recurrence following ‘curative’ resection for large bowel cancer I: the overall picture. Br J Surg 1984;71:12–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Phillips RK, Hittinger R, Blesovsky L, Fry JS, Fielding LP. Local recurrence following ‘curative’ surgery for large bowel cancer II: the rectum and sigmoid. Br J Surg 1984;71:17–20.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. McArdle CS, Hole D. Impact of variability among surgeons on postoperative morbidity and mortality and ultimate survival. BMJ 1991;302:1501–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Reinbach DH, McGregor JR, Murray GD, O'Dwyer PJ. Effect of the surgeon's specialty interest on the type of resection performed for colorectal cancer. Dis Col Rectum 1994;37:1020–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Porter GA, Soskolne CL, Yakimets WW, Newman SC. Surgeon-related factors and outcome in rectal cancer. Ann Surg 1998;227:157–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Rouffet F, Hay J-M, Vacher B,et al. Curative resection for left colonic carcinoma: hemicolectomyvs. segmental colectomy. A prospective, controlled, multicenter trial. Dis Col Rectum 1994;37:651–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Adam IJ, Mohamdee MO, Martin IG,et al. The role of circumferential margin involvement in the local recurrence of rectal cancer. Lancet 1994;344:707–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Docherty JG, McGregor JR, Akyol AM, Murray GD, Galloway DJ. Comparison of manually constructed and stapled anastomoses in colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 1995;221:176–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Docherty JG, McGregor JR, Purdie CA, Galloway DJ, O'Dwyer PJ. Efficacy of tumouricidal agents in vitro and in vivo. Br J Surg 1995;82:1050–2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wiggers T, Jeekel J, Arends JW,et al. No-touch isolation technique in colon cancer: a controlled prospective trial. Br J Surg 1988;75:409–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Supported by a grant from The Greater Glasgow Health Board.

About this article

Cite this article

Dorrance, H.R., Docherty, G.M. & O'Dwyer, P.J. Effect of surgeon specialty interest on patient outcome after potentially curative colorectal cancer surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 43, 492–498 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02237192

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02237192

Key words

Navigation