Abstract
This work brings together the scattered information on marine plant harvests and the colloid extraction industry in Portugal, as an initial contribution to the improvement of resource management. The first phase of exploitation of marine plant resources started prior to the 14th century, with the gathering and sale of storm-tossed seaweeds for fertilizer. The harvest of seagrasses and algae at Ria de Aveiro was of great economic importance. The second phase of resource exploitation began with the wider scale harvest of agarophyte species for colloid extraction. Portugal is at present the third largest harvester of the agarophytes Gelidium and Pterocladia (2500 t annually), and it is the fifth largest agar producer (350 t annually). Other colloid-producing species, including Chondrus crispus and Mastocarpus stellatus, are also harvested for export. The total agarophyte landings, agar production and income from agar exports is far below the maximum levels attained in the early 1970s. The status of stocks in each different harvest zone on the continental coast and the Azores is examined. Although there is an effective management structure for the Portuguese marine plant resource, research is needed to provide a sound biological basis for management.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Armisen R, Galatas F (1987) Production, properties and uses of agar. FAO Fish. Tech. Pap. 288: 1–57.
Caddy JF, Fisher WA (1984) FAO interests in promoting understanding of world resources, their optimal harvesting, and fishery and ecological interactions. Hydrobiologia 124: 111–121.
Fralick RA, Andrade F (1981) The growth, reproduction, harvesting and management of Pterocladia pinnata (Rhodophyceae) in the Azores, Portugal. Proc. Xth Internacional Seaweed Symposium, 289–295.
Michanek G (1975) Seaweed resources of the ocean. FAO Fish. Tech. Pap. 138: 127 pp.
Oliveira ML (1947) Sobre a utilizacao de algumas algas marinhas da nossa costa. Broteria 16, 77–82.
Oliveira JC (1984) Notas sobre o crescimento de Gelidium sesquipedale (Clem.) Born. et Thur., na costa ocidental portuguesa. In Vasco Marques (ed.) Acta do IV Simpósio Ibérico de Estudos do Benthos Marinho, 3. Lisboa, 1984, 51–61.
Palminha, F. (1971) Exploração e utilização de Algas Marinhas na Plataforma Portuguesa e nas Ilhas do Arquipélago dos Açores. Junta Nacional de Fomento das Pescas 7: 25–36.
Palminha F, Melo RA, Santos R (1982) A existncia de Gelidium sesquipedale (Clem.) Bornet et Thuret, na costa Sul do Algarve. I — distribuição local. Bol. Inst. Nac. Invest. Pescas 8: 93–105.
Palminha F, Santos R, Melo RA (1985) A existncia de Gelidium sesquipedale (Clem.) Bornet et Thuret na costa sul do Algarve. II. Biomassa total. Bol. Inst. Nac. Invest. Pescas 13: 77–91.
Pringle JD, James D, Tseng CK (1989) Overview of a workshop on production and utilization of commercial seaweeds — Qingdao. China, 1987. J. appl. Phycol. 1: 83–90.
Pringle JD, Sharp GJ (1990) A canadian fishery update and advice to policymakers and the stock assessment phycologist. In C. Yarish, C.A. Penniman and P. Van Patten (eds), Economically important marine plants of the Atlantic, their biology and cultivation, Connecticut Sea Grant, 113–139.
Ricker WE (1975) Computation and interpretation of biological statistics of fish populations. Bull. Fish. Res. Board Can. 191, 1–382.
Santelices B (1988) Synopsis of biological data on the seaweed genera Gelidium and Pterocladia (Rhodophyta). FAO Fish. Synop. 145: 55 pp.
Silverthone, W (1977) Optimal production from a seaweed resource. Bot. Mar., 20, 75–98.
Veiga de Oliveira E, Galhano F, Pereira B (1975) Actividades Agro-Marítimas em Portugal. Instituto de Alta Cultura, Lisboa 236 pp.
Whyte JNC, Englar JR (1981) The agar component of the red seaweed Gelidium purpurascens. Phytochemistry 20: 237–240.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
author for correspondence
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Santos, R., Duarte, P. Marine plant harvest in Portugal. J Appl Phycol 3, 11–18 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00003915
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00003915