Abstract
Solar radiation is the major source of energy in the universe and critical for the plant growth and development. The UV-B radiations, the small fraction of solar radiation affect the plant growth via altering various morphological, physiological, and molecular responses. However, plants cope UV-B stress using their defense system which is not strong enough to recover the damage and yield losses caused by enhanced or ambient UV-B exposure. Hence, various strategies have been developed by plant scientists in the past years to circumvent or mitigate the UV-B stress. In the present chapter, we have discussed the impact of UV-B stress upon overall performance of plants including yield. In addition, various available UV-B-avoiding strategies have been addressed such as exclusion of solar UV-B by UV-B cutoff filters and seed priming with magnetic field which are useful to provide UV-B stress tolerance to the plants.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
7.1 Introduction
The solar radiation affects all living organisms on the earth directly or indirectly, and it is the major source of energy essential for the growth and development of the plants. In general, solar radiation reaches to the Earth surface is mainly composed of ultraviolet (UV), visible, and infrared rays. Among these rays, particularly, UV radiations are composed of three types of wavelengths: UV-A (315–400 nm), UV-B (280–315 nm), and UV-C (200–280 nm). The UV-B radiation constitutes a small fraction of total solar radiation which reaches to the Earth’s surface due to stratospheric ozone depletion (Kataria et al. 2014a, b; Bornman et al. 2019) and it is currently reached to its maximum level which is a serious concern to the world. Towards controlling the ozone depletion, Montreal protocol (an international agreement to protect ozone depletion) suggested that ozone layer can be revert to the pre-1980 levels at the mid-latitudes by 2040–2070, if it is followed properly by participating countries (Mohammed and Tarpley 2010; Bais et al. 2018, 2019). However, the rise in the levels of greenhouse gases could delay this return (Newman et al. 2001; Bais et al. 2019). UV-B radiation plays an imperative role in terrestrial ecosystems but, it can represent a risk for plants in excess. The excess UV-B exposure induces various negative effects to which plants can respond with defense and adaptive mechanisms (Kataria et al. 2014a; Rácz et al. 2018). Photoexcitation of biomolecules like nucleic acids, proteins and lipids via absorbing UV-B can cause alteration in the various biological processes (Caldwell et al. 2007; Jenkins 2009; Tian and Yu 2009; Kataria et al. 2014a). The UV-B exposure is known to delay seedling emergence, reduce leaf area, leaf length, leaf thickness and midrib thickness. Furthermore, curling of cotyledons/leaves, bronzing/glazing of leaves, leaf chlorosis with necrosis, reduced internode length with overall plant height, and delayed flowering are the symptoms shown by various crop plants (Caldwell et al. 1995, 2007; Robson et al. 2015; Suchar and Robberecht 2015). It has been suggested that these variety of symptoms are the result of perturbed hormone metabolism and cell wall loosening due to UV-B rays (Hectors et al. 2007; Casati and Walbot 2003). In spite of morphological changes, physiological parameters are also known to be affected via UV-B exposure. The photosynthetic machinery of plants is very sensitive to excess UV-B exposure which leads to hamper the carbon, nitrogen metabolism, photosynthetic efficiency and ultimately reduces the biomass accumulation and crop yield (Kataria et al. 2013, 2014a; Dotto and Casati 2017). Earlier, various indoor studies have shown that UV-B exposure can impair three major processes of photosynthesis: CO2 fixation, photophosphorylation, and stomatal movement to regulate the CO2 supply (Allen et al. 1998; Teramura and Sullivan 1994; Kataria et al. 2014a). The prolonged exposure of UV-B rays destruct the carotenoids and chlorophyll which ultimately reduces the photosynthetic performance of plants (Nogues and Baker 1995; Baker et al. 1997; Allen et al. 1998; Wilson et al. 1995; Yu et al. 2013). It has been reported that photosystem-II (PS-II) is very sensitive to UV-B exposure due to their chemical organization of D1 and D2 proteins along with oxygen-evolving complex (Kataria et al. 2014a, b; Faseela and Puthur 2018; Schultze and Bilger 2019; Çiçek et al. 2020). The chlorophyll a (chl a) fluorescence parameters such as polyphasic fluorescence transients (OJIP transients) show lower fluorescence yield particularly at I to P-phase in leaves of plants grown under UV-B stress (Kalaji et al. 2018; Kataria et al. 2020a, 2021).
In addition, prolonged exposure of UV-B rays triggers oxidative stress due to increased production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in plants (Jain et al. 2004; Kataria et al. 2017a, b). However, increased ROS production can be neutralized through enzymatic and non-enzymatic defense mechanisms (Jain et al. 2004; Kataria et al. 2007; Dias et al. 2020). The enzymatic defense system includes antioxidant enzymes like superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), and enzymes of Halliwell/Asada pathway, whereas non-enzymatic defense system includes molecules like ascorbate, tocopherol, glutathione, carotenoids, and phenolics (Jain et al. 2004; Hideg et al. 2013; Kataria et al. 2007; Dias et al. 2020). Although plants have evolved with these defense systems, these are not enough to recover the damage and yield loss caused by prolonged UV-B exposure. In this scenario, UV-B rays reaching on the Earth could not be avoided and so it becomes crucial to find out the ways which can protect the plants from the UV-B exposure. However, various methods are available to avoid or mitigate UV-B stress, but exclusion of solar UV component from natural solar radiation and magneto-priming is most commonly used methods found in the literatures (Krizek and Mirecki 2004; Kataria et al. 2013, 2017a, 2020a, 2021; Prajapati et al. 2020; Raipuria et al. 2021). Therefore, present chapter is aimed to provide an overview about avoiding strategies used to improve the plant tolerance towards UV-B stress by circumvent the harmful effects of UV-B radiations.
7.2 Solar UV Exclusion as a Strategy to Avoid the Effects of UV-B Stress
It is difficult to get the place devoid of UV-B rays, therefore, UV-B stress related studies were conducted under growth chambers and green houses equipped with UV-B lamps. Later by 1990s, the scientific community questioned the usage of this strategy, as UV-B lamps could not provide the natural ratios of UV-B/UV-A and UV-B/PAR radiations (Caldwell and Flint 1994, 1997; Krizek and Mirecki 2004). Further, it was suggested that outdoor studies should be carried out under ambient solar radiations to evaluate the actual impact of solar UV-B radiation on the plant growth and development. Now, there are two widely preferred ways of conducting outdoor studies aiming to see the effect of UV-B exposure: (1) UV-B enhancement and (2) UV-B attenuation approach (Rousseaux et al. 2004). In UV-B enhancement approach, solar radiations are supplemented with UV-B lamps to mimic the condition of increased UV-B incidence due to ozone depletion. On the other hand, UV-B attenuation is performed using solar UV-B exclusion filters to mimic the (–UV-B) conditions (Lingakumar et al. 1999; Phoenix et al. 2000; Krizek and Chalker 2005; Zhang et al. 2014; Kataria et al. 2013, 2014b; Kataria and Guruprasad 2012a, b, 2014, 2015). The plastic screens or polyester filters can reduce the ambient UV-B levels and can be used to provide the sub-ambient and near-ambient UV-B treatment conditions. These two outdoor approaches are simple, reliable, and cost-effective which can be used to see the actual impact of ambient or enhanced UV-B on the plants performance.
7.2.1 Plant Growth, Photosynthesis, Antioxidant Defense, and Yield Under Solar UV-B Exclusion
In the natural environment, plants are exposed to combined stresses which in turn cause several changes in gene expression, plant metabolism, and morphology. Enhancing the crop productivity under variable climate has been a major challenge to the entire agricultural scientific community. One of the unavoidable stresses, UV-B radiations, hamper the plant growth and development by damaging the cell membranes, DNA, RNA, cell organelles like mitochondria, chloroplasts, etc. (Hollosy 2002; Jain et al. 2003, 2004; Kataria et al. 2014a; Vanhaelewyn et al. 2020). However, the extent of damage depends on the intensity with duration of UV-B irradiance and most importantly the plant developmental stage getting exposed. In regard to overcoming UV-B stress, ambient UV-B exclusion is a potential strategy to obtain higher growth and biomass/yield. Several reports have revealed that plants grown under solar UV-B exclusion conditions showed increased growth in both aboveground and belowground parts of the plants. For example, various plant species like radish, barley, mung bean, pea, pumpkin, soybean, Cyamopsis, Vigna, wheat, cucumber, cotton, sorghum, amaranthus, and trigonella showed increased growth in terms of plant height, leaf area, specific leaf weight, leaf weight ratio, overall biomass accumulation, efficiency of PSII, photosynthesis, and yield under solar UV-B exclusion conditions (Pal et al. 1997; Mazza et al. 1999; Zavalla and Botto 2002; Krizek and Mirecki 2004; Amudha et al. 2005; Guruprasad et al. 2007; Pal et al. 2006; Kanungo et al. 2013; Kataria and Guruprasad 2012a, b, 2014, 2015; Kataria et al. 2013; Sharma et al. 2019). Similarly, ambient UV-B exclusion allowed plants to produce more tillers and branches in monocots and dicots, respectively (Mazza et al. 1999; Coleman and Day 2004; Kataria and Guruprasad 2012a). In Vaccinium uliginosum, it was reported that ambient UV-B exclusion increases the biomass of belowground tissues (Rinnan et al. 2005). The UV-B-free environment improved the photosynthetic capacity up to 33% over normal condition grown common beans plant which suggested that UV-B rays primarily reduces the photosynthetic rate and CO2 fixation (Moussa and Khodary 2008). A number of reports have shown the enhanced net photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance upon UV-B exclusion in Populus (Schumaker et al. 1997), maize, and mung bean (Pal et al. 1997), wheat and pea (Pal et al. 2006), Vaccinium uliginosum (Albert et al. 2008), sorghum (Kataria and Guruprasad 2012b), Amaranthus tricolor (Kataria and Guruprasad 2014), and wheat (Kataria and Guruprasad 2015). In another reports, it was shown that the UV-B exclusion via polyester filters increased the root biomass, number of nodules, and nodule fresh weight along with increased nitrogenase activity (by 120%) and leghemoglobin content (by 63%) in fenugreek (Sharma and Guruprasad 2012). Other reports showed the higher levels of α-tocopherol in UV-B-excluded plants which are important for translocation of photosynthates from leaves to root (Chouhan et al. 2008; Baroniya et al. 2014; Kataria et al. 2014b). Secondary metabolites are the byproducts of various metabolic pathways which are known to help the plants in the adaptation to its surrounding climate (Alvarez 2014). The saponins are the triterpene glycosides known to have antimicrobial, antitermitic properties, and their concentration in the plants increased under higher light intensities (Mathur et al. 2000; Maulidiani et al. 2012). In cotton, UV-B-excluded plants showed increased plant height due to increased number of elongated nodes. These increased elongated nodes showed the lower amount of saponins as compared to plants grown under ambient UV-B conditions. This study proved that saponins act as growth inhibitor in ambient UV-B conditions (Dehariya et al. 2018).
The plants grown under solar UV-B exclusion conditions showed enhanced photosynthetic performance due to higher photosynthetic pigments, efficiency of PSII, electron transport rate, photosynthetic rate, and stomatal conductance with increased activity of photosynthetic enzymes such as carbonic anhydrase (CA), Ribulose-1,5 bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco), and phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEPC) over the plants grown under ambient solar UV-B conditions (Solanki et al. 2006; Kataria et al. 2013, 2014a; Kataria and Guruprasad 2012b, 2014, 2015). In a recent study, UV-B exposed scot pine seedlings showed decreased quantum yields and electron transport at both donor and acceptor sides of photosystems and the performance indexes (Çiçek et al. 2020). However, chlorophyll fluorescence parameters such as quantum efficiencies, phenomenological fluxes, and performance indices were enhanced by UV-B exclusion which suggests the adverse impact of ambient UV-B on these parameters (Kataria et al. 2013; Kataria and Guruprasad 2014, 2015). On the other side, solar UV-B exclusion has been observed to significantly increase the RuBisco activity and protein in the in microalgae and higher plants; it indicates that the ambient or enhanced UV-B lowers the Rubisco activity and protein content (Bischof et al. 2000, 2002; Pedro et al. 2009). The reduced activity of Rubisco could be due to suppression of genes encoding subunits of Rubisco and damage from the ROS generated under UV-B radiations (Jordan et al. 1992; Mackerness et al. 1999; Dehariya et al. 2012; Shine and Guruprasad 2012a, b; Kataria et al. 2013).
The soluble sugars, polysaccharides, secondary metabolite, and total flavonoid contents were also increased in the medicinal plant Prunella vulgaris upon UV-B exclusion (Chen et al. 2019). In another report, cumulative impact of altitude, cultivar, and solar radiation on the growth, physiology, and yield was analyzed. The exclusion of UV-B rays from solar radiation prompted the photosynthetic rate, stomatal number, and conductance with dry matter of Boloso-1 cultivar of Colocasia esculenta (L.) species (Derebe et al. 2019). In a recent report, UV-B exposed plants of Silene littorea showed increased concentration of anthocyanin (20–30%) and UV-B-absorbing compounds (12–25%) over UV-B-excluded plants which gave a clue of their involvement in photoprotection (Del Valle et al. 2020).
Overall solar UV-B exclusion can alter various morphological and physiological parameters leading to the improved plant performance (Fig. 7.1). For instance, UV-B exclusion increases photosynthesis, reduces the content of UV-B-absorbing substances, ROS and antioxidants (ascorbic acid and α-tocopherol); and lower activities of antioxidant enzymes such as SOD, peroxidase (POD), ascorbic acid peroxidase (APX), and glutatione reductase (GR) (Baroniya et al. 2013; Dehariya et al. 2011, 2012; Kataria et al. 2013, Kataria and Guruprasad 2012a, b, 2014, 2015; Sharma et al. 2019). Also, several others reports claim that solar UV-B exclusion improve the metabolism pattern that leads to enhanced primary metabolism and reduced synthesis of secondary products, like saponins, flavonoids, and phenolics compounds (Alemu and Gebre 2020; Dehariya et al. 2018; Kataria et al. 2013, 2014b).
The crop productivity depends on the overall performance of plants grown in the field under dynamic climate. The plant performance is proportionally related to yield and may vary due to their environmental interaction. The incidence of damaging effects caused by UV-B exposure varies according to the locations around the globe (Teramura et al. 1990). Several research groups have suggested that impact of UV-B radiation is high in tropical regions including India due to longer exposure of sunlight (Agrawal and Rathore 2007; Amudha et al. 2005; Guruprasad et al. 2007; Kataria and Guruprasad 2012a, b, 2014, 2015). Therefore, ambient solar UV-B radiation causes significant yield loss on terrestrial plants of tropical regions (Kataria et al. 2013; Kataria and Guruprasad 2014; Zhu and Yang 2015). Primarily, enhanced UV-B exposure alters the leaf ultrastructure and damages the photosynthetic apparatus, PS-II efficiency, and hence affects the net photosynthesis and ultimately reduces the yield of plants (Kakani et al. 2003; Kataria et al. 2014a). There are several reports which have been proved to enhance the yield in various crops. In pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo L.), the UV-B filtration from solar radiation doubled the yield (Germ et al. 2005). In a field study, the effect of UV-A/UV-B exclusion showed up to 50% increased yield of Cyamopsis tetragonoloba among three tested tropical legumes (Amudha et al. 2005). In another greenhouse study conducted by using UV absorbing films showed that UV-B exclusion enhanced the fruit size and yield by 20% in eggplant (Kittas et al. 2006). Similarly, two strawberry cultivars named Camarosa and Ventana showed enhanced productivity of 30% and 20%, respectively, when grown in the absence of UV radiation (Casal et al. 2009); however, the ripening of fruits was delayed and no nutritional parameters were improved in both cultivars. In a field study, four different varieties of wheat (Purna, Vidisha, Naveen Chandausi, and Swarna) grown under UV-B cutoff filters showed the significant enhancement in grain yield (44%) of wheat variety of Purna; Vidisha showed 65% increase after the exclusion of UV-B. However, other two varieties Swarna and N. Chandausi did not showed significant enhancement (Kataria and Guruprasad 2015). The solar UV-A + UV-B and UV-B exclusion showed enhanced yield parameters in terms of weight of total bolls and fibers (cotton), fresh weight of leaves (amaranthus), number of ears/panicles, grain yield per plant (wheat and sorghum), and number of seeds and seed weight (soybean) (Baroniya et al. 2011, 2014;Kataria and Guruprasad 2014, 2015; Kataria et al. 2013, 2014b). However, the extent of improved yield parameters was more in UV-B exclusion rather than UV-A + UV-B exclusion (Kataria et al. 2013). In Curcuma longa, UV-B exclusion grown plants showed significant increment in the photosynthetic rate, biomass accumulation, curcuminoid, and curcumin yield (Ferreira et al. 2016). To check the performance of monocots and dicots under ambient UV-B stress, Kataria et al. (2013) and Kataria and Guruprasad (2012a, b, 2014, 2015) research group conducted a comparative study and concluded that UV-B stress in the tropical environment lowers the PS-II efficiency, assimilation of nitrogen and carbon dioxide, which ultimately leads to reduced plant growth and productivity. They also showed that dicots are more sensitive than monocots for UV-B radiations. In addition, several reports have witnessed the improved crop yield under solar UV-B exclusion conditions when compared with ambient UV-B stressed conditions (Guruprasad et al. 2007; Kataria and Guruprasad 2012a, b; Roro et al. 2016; Sharma et al. 2019). On the basis of discussed literatures, solar UV-B rays considerably hamper the plant growth, development, and productivity, and if ozone depletion continues, it will allow more UV-B rays reaching to the Earth’s surface which will further have more biological sequences to the plant growth and development.
7.3 Magneto-priming as a Strategy to Avoid UV-B Stress
Magneto-priming is a method of seed priming, where dry seeds are treated with magnetic field (MF). For improved performance of seeds, exposure timing and intensity of MF always need to be optimized according to the species (Sarraf et al. 2020, 2021). For example, the treatment of soybean seeds with static magnetic field (SMF) strength of 200 mT for 1 h has been used to improve its performance and for the alleviation of adverse effects caused by ambient or supplemental UV-B stress (Fatima et al. 2021b; Kataria et al. 2017a, 2020a, 2021; Raipuria et al. 2021). In last decade, several scientific reports have been published showing magneto-priming based improved seed germination, seed vigor, seedling emergence, seedling growth, increased biomass accumulation, photosynthesis, and yield (Shine et al. 2011, 2012; Bhardwaj et al. 2012; Sarraf et al. 2020, 2021). Besides improved seed performance, magneto-priming of seeds have been shown to provide the tolerance against various abiotic stresses such as drought, salinity, heavy metal, and UV-B stress during seed germination and subsequent developmental stages of plants (Anand et al. 2012; Fatima et al. 2021a, b; Baghel et al. 2016, 2018, 2019; Kataria et al. 2015, 2017a, b, 2019, 2020a, b; Raipuria et al. 2021; Sarraf et al. 2020, 2021).
These improved performances of seeds after magneto-priming raise the question that how does SMF interacts with biological systems and improves their growth and performance. The answer of this question lies in the magneto-reception theory which accounts for the reaction of plants to DC/static fields and alternating magnetic fields (Camps-Raga et al. 2009; Shine et al. 2011; Shine and Guruprasad 2012a, b). As per this theory, there are two mechanisms named as ion cyclotron-resonance (ICR) and radical pair model to understand the influence of magneto-priming on plants (Galland and Pazur 2005; Fatima et al. 2021b). As per radical pair model, the biochemical reaction involving spin-correlated radical pairs should be sensitive to external magnetic fields. The biological reaction involving the spin selectivity and thus the sensitivity to magnetic field are the emission intensity of the photosynthetic reaction center and the triplet yield. As evidenced from the experimental and theoretical studies, the application of magnetic fields increases the radical lifetime and average radical concentration and shoot up the probability of radical reactions with the cellular components. These examinations apply also to the enzymatic systems entailing the radical pair formation and recombination (Galland and Pazur 2005). The external magnetic field can also modulate the emission intensity and the radical pair intermediates and triplet yields that occur in photosystems I and II of green plants. The increased water uptake in SMF-treated seeds as compared to untreated seeds is explained by the assumption that the magnetic field interacts with ionic currents in the cell membrane of the plant embryo (García-Reina and Arza-Pascual 2001).
When the magnetic field is applied, the chemical reaction rates modulate according to the radical pair mechanism. There is also a modulation of transport rates and binding by the ICR mechanism. Liboff in the ICR model explains the acceleration of Ca+2 by cyclotron resonance which is generated by the acceleration of extremely low-magnetic field and there is increased flux Ca+2 ion (Liboff 1985). The formula by ICR model states the frequency and ion specificity and also explains the frequency-specific absorption of electromagnetic fields by the ions (Del Giudice et al. 2002). In addition to these mechanisms, the interaction between environmental impacts such as ionizing radiation (ultraviolet–UV) and the magnetic field influence as a repair mechanism has also been discussed by Galland- Pazur (Dicarlo et al. 1999).
UV-B and MF are the two aspects of radiation biology, and both have contradictory effects; UV-B irradiation has damaging effects while MF priming has beneficial effects on plant growth and development (Shine et al. 2011, 2012; Kataria et al. 2013, 2014a, 2017a, 2020a, 2021). The UV-B radiation and magnetic treatments caused alteration in the cell membrane, seed germination, plant photosynthetic efficiency, enzyme activities, and yield of the crop plants (Yinan et al. 2005; Shine et al. 2011, 2012; Kataria et al. 2014a, b, 2015, 2017a, 2020a, 2021).
7.3.1 Effect of Magneto-priming on Seed Germination, Growth, Photosynthesis, Nitrogen Fixation, Antioxidant Defense, and Yield under UV-B Stress
Once the seed has sown in the soil, faster germination and vigorous seedling growth are very important for seedling establishment and their ability to cope with continuously changing environment (Prajapati et al. 2020; Sarraf et al. 2020). The faster seed germination is very well documented as the primitive effect of magneto-priming. In a recent report, UV-B exposure for 1 h caused severe reduction in seed germination and early seedling growth parameters of soybean possibly due to reduced activities of total amylase, nitric oxide synthase (NOS), and nitrate reductase (NR). At the same time, they have also proved that magneto-priming of soybean seeds promotes the nitric oxide (NO) production via NOS and alleviates the UV-B stress in soybean seedlings (Raipuria et al. 2021). Further, perusal of literature also revealed that stimulation from magneto-priming exists in the plants till its maturity; thus, the magneto-priming (200 mT, SMF for 1 h) of soybean seeds increased the growth parameters such as plant height, leaf area, specific leaf weight, thickness of the midrib of trifoliate leaves, biomass accumulation, nitrogen fixation, photosynthetic performance, and crop yield in the presence of ambient and supplemental/enhanced UV-B stress (Fatima et al. 2021b; Kataria et al. 2017a, 2020a, 2021). Magneto-priming with SMF pretreatment and exclusion of solar UV-B components are the methods that put an end to the defense against the stress caused by ambient UV-B stress (Fatima et al. 2021b; Kataria et al. 2015, 2017a, 2020a, 2021). The comparison of soybean plants from magneto-primed groups with the respective unprimed ones even in the presence of ambient UV-B as well as enhanced or supplemental UV-B irradiations found that the rectifying effects of SMF were distinctive on overall growth of the plants (Fatima et al. 2021b; Kataria et al. 2015, 2017a, 2020a, 2021). The magneto-priming and solar UV-B exclusion have shown to accumulate higher biomass and increased leaf thickness in sorghum and amaranthus (Kataria and Guruprasad 2012b, 2014). The reduction in nitrogenase, nitrate reductase, nitrite reductase, and leghemoglobin (contents in the nodulated mung bean cultivars) confirmed that there is a negative impact of UV-B elevation on nitrogen fixation and assimilation (Choudhary and Agrawal 2014). Similarly, UV-B supplementation also reduced N2 fixation in the two tropical leguminous crops Phaselous mungo and Vigna radiate (Singh 1997). However, the number and size of nodules, total protein, and Lb content was found to be reduced in soybean plants grown under ambient UV-B stress after exclusion of solar UV-B (Chouhan et al. 2008; Baroniya et al. 2014). Earlier studies on individual effects of SMF priming and solar UV exclusion in several crops indicated the stimulations in the activities of CA, NR, nitrogenase, and Rubisco along with the enhancement of plant growth, leaf area, biomass accumulation, and photosynthetic efficiency (Kataria et al. 2013, 2015, 2017a, 2020a; Kataria and Guruprasad 2012b, 2014, 2015). The SMF treatment has also shown the positive effect on the activity of nitrogen fixation under ambient UV-B stress as it enhances the leghemoglobin and heme-chrome content and also nitrogenase activity in the soybean root nodules (Kataria et al., 2017a, 2020a).
Ambient and supplemental UV-B were observed to increase the synthesis of UV-B-absorbing substances (UAS), reactive oxygen species (ROS) like superoxide radical (O2•−) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), antioxidants like ascorbic acid and α-Tocopherol, and decrease the NR activity; subsequently, it results in a decreased rate of photosynthesis, biomass accumulation, and yield of the plants (Kataria et al. 2017a, 2020a, 2021). The SMF pretreatment caused reduction in the amount of ROS, MDA, proline, and UV-B-absorbing substances and the antioxidant enzymes such as SOD, GR, and POD activities similar to solar UV-B exclusion (Kataria et al. 2017a, 2020a, 2021). It indicates that the presence of UV-B stress caused the oxidative stress, and the exclusion of solar UV-B and SMF pretreatment to the seeds eradicates the requirement for the defense against harmful UV-B stress and leads to augmentation of primary metabolism and improves the crop yield (Kataria et al. 2017a, 2020a, 2021). Thus, crop yield is enhanced by SMF pretreatment and solar UV exclusion due to better leaf growth, leaf biomass, and higher efficiency of PSII, carbon and nitrogen fixation, higher DNA, RNA and protein content in the plants as compared to the plants receiving ambient UV-B and also supplemental or enhanced UV-B radiation (Kataria et al. 2017a, 2020a, 2021). Kataria et al. (2021) also found that SMF pretreatment increased the NO content and NR activity, higher efficiency of PSII, higher values of quantum yield of electron transport, relative amplitude of the I–P phase of Chl a fluorescence, performance indices, decreased intercellular CO2 concentration, lower amount of UAS, ROS, and antioxidants that consequently improve the yield of soybean plants under ambient UV-B as well as supplemental UV-B stress. The recent reports on SMF pretreatment on yield of soybean plants in the presence of ambient or supplemental UV-B stress showed the enhancement in all the yield parameters namely number of pods, number of seeds/pods, pod and seed weight per plant and harvest index in the plants emerged from SMF-treated seeds as compared to the plants emerging from untreated seeds (Kataria et al. 2017a, 2020a, 2021).
7.4 Synchrotron Radiation and Its Use for Leaf Venation Imaging After Solar UV Exclusion and SMF Pretreatment
Synchrotron light sources are the scientific tools for basic and applied research in variety of fields ranging from material science, physics, chemistry, life science to archeological applications (Margaritondo 1988; Margaritondo and Meuli 2003). During the past five decades, synchrotron source has evolved from first to fourth generation. The synchrotron light sources are composed of a storage ring which emits electromagnetic radiation (EMR) when the relativistic electron moves on a curved path with speed of light (Margaritondo 1988). The highly coherent radiation emitted from the synchrotron source can be used for phase sensitive imaging. Synchrotron radiation has been successfully used to observe the structural variations in leaf venation mainly the major conducting vein and adjoining minor veins of soybean plant under the influence of external environmental effects; the images of middle region of leaf midrib were obtained in intact third trifoliate leaves without any staining or sectioning (Fatima et al. 2016, 2017).
The morphological changes in leaf venation after exclusion of UV-B radiation and its impact on the leaf hydraulic activity of soybean plant have been studied using synchrotron-based X-ray imaging technique (Fatima et al. 2016). These authors reported that exclusion of solar UV-B caused 98% and 117% increase, respectively, in width of the mid-rib and minor veins of soybean third trifoliate leaves as compared to the leaves of plant grown under ambient UV-B stress. The novel phase contrast imaging technique with synchrotron source has also been applied to investigate the morphological changes in venation of leaves grown from soybean seeds pretreated with static magnetic field of different strengths from 50 to 300 mT (Fatima et al. 2017). The SMF strength of 200 mT for 1 h that caused considerable increase of 20% in thickness of the midrib was observed in soybean leaves (Fatima et al. 2017). These results encouraged the combined effect studies, involving soybean leaf midrib imaging grown from magneto-primed seeds in UV-exclusion conditions also; this study also showed the higher thickness of midrib and minor veins in soybean leaves as compared to the plants grown under ambient UV-B stress (Fatima et al. 2021b).
Leaf venation consists of the midrib or the major conducting vein and the associated minor veins which form a network for transporting water and nutrients to the plants from the roots. To understand the distribution of nutrient resources in plants, leaf venation is visualized and quantified using high-resolution X-ray Phase-Contrast Imaging (PCI) (Fatima et al. 2016). Compared to the conventional methods, X-ray PCI is a fast and novel method to image the leaf venation in intact leaves as plant leaves are thin weakly absorbing samples (Fatima et al. 2016). The leaf venation network is linked to the rate of photosynthesis in plants through the leaf hydraulic mechanism. Water transportation is the vital leaf growth parameter and shows an increment with the SMF pretreatment of the seeds which are also indicated by the midrib enhancement. X-ray PCI has been used to image the midrib and the associated higher order minor veins to indicate the enhancement in these veins in soybean with the SMF treatment, UV exclusion from the solar radiation and in the combination of these two phenomena (Fatima et al. 2016, 2017, 2021b). In order to visualize and quantify the leaf venation from the PCI images obtained at the synchrotron, single-distance phase retrieval has also been applied for soybean leaves which are comprised of light-absorbing element. These structural changes in leaves obtained from X-ray PCI are associated with the photosynthetic rate and stomatal conductance which thus showed and improved plant productivity after the SMF treatment and UV exclusion (Fatima et al. 2016, 2017). Detailed investigation has been performed to correlate leaf venation and leaf hydraulic mechanisms by imaging major and minor vein up to 3°. These studies conducted with synchrotron-based X-ray PCI showed that the two parts of radiation biology namely magnetic field treatment with low flux densities and solar UV exclusion have positive effects on leaf venation and plant growth parameters such as leaf biomass and thickness of midrib and minor veins of third trifoliate leaves of soybean along with higher rate of photosynthesis under both individually and in the combination (Fatima et al. 2016, 2017, 2021b).
7.5 Conclusion and Future Perspectives
Current projected elevated levels of UV-B rays and its impact on agricultural crops have become a major concern to the plant biologists. The enhanced UV-B rays hamper the crop productivity by altering the developmental rates, leaf photosynthesis (photosystems, thylakoid, and grana membrane integrity), defense compounds like flavonoids, phenolic compounds, or waxes. In other direction, current UV-B levels are strong enough to induce ROS generation which triggers the antioxidant defense systems which also results in retarded growth and development of crop plants. In order to cope with UV-B stress, growing the plants under solar UV exclusion and SMF pretreatment of seeds, both improve the performance under ambient UV-B or enhanced UV-B stress. Both strategies improve the plant growth, biomass accumulation, nitrogen fixation through higher leghemoglobin, heme-chrome content, nitrogenase activity in the root nodules, higher efficiency of PSII, and rate of photosynthesis which eventually results in higher crop yield. Thus, SMF pre-sowing treatment and solar UV-B exclusion alter the plant metabolism and provide protection to the plants from UV-B stress. As per the available reports, increased crop yield by SMF and solar UV exclusion is due to the better leaf growth, leaf biomass, efficiency of PS II, higher carbon and nitrogen fixation, higher the nucleic acid and protein content in the plants in comparison to untreated ones grown under UV-B stress conditions. Hence, magneto-priming of seeds before sowing and exclusion of solar UV-B can be used as potential strategies for the protection of plants to provide the tolerance against ambient UV-B stress. However, molecular mechanisms involved in magneto-priming-based or UV-B exclusion-based improved performance of the plants, are not fully understood. Detailed studies in this direction need to be conducted which can shed the light upon hidden molecular mechanism proving UV-B stress tolerance in both cases. Also, genes regulating the leaf growth, photosynthesis, nitrogen fixation in model plants and crops can be explored and characterized to be involved in the UV-B stress tolerance.
References
Agrawal SB, Rathore D (2007) Changes in oxidative stress defense system in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and mung bean (Vigna radiata L.) cultivars grown with and without mineral nutrients and irradiated by supplemental ultraviolet-B. Environ Exp Bot 59:21–33
Albert KR, Mikkelsen TN, Ro-Poulsen H (2008) Ambient UV-B radiation decreases photosynthesis in high arctic Vaccinium uliginosum. Physiol Plant 133:199–210
Alemu ST, Gebre H (2020) Impact of ultraviolet-B radiation based on altitude on photosynthetic efficiency, growth performance and crop yield: a review. J Hortic Postharvest Res 3:285–296
Allen DJ, Nogues S, Baker NR (1998) Ozone depletion and increased UV-B radiation: is the real threat to photosynthesis? J Exp Bot 49:1775–1788
Alvarez MA (2014) Plant biotechnology for health: from secondary metabolites to molecular farming. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05771-2
Amudha P, Jayakumar M, Kulandaivelu G (2005) Impacts of ambient solar UV (280-400 nm) radiation on three tropical legumes. J Plant Biol 48:284–291
Anand A, Nagarajan S, Verma AP, Joshi DK, Pathak PC, Bhardwaj J (2012) Pre-treatment of seeds with static magnetic field ameliorates soil water stress in seedlings of maize (Zea mays L.). Indian J Biochem Biophys 49:63–70
Baghel L, Kataria S, Guruprasad KN (2016) Static magnetic field treatment of seeds improves carbon and nitrogen metabolism under salinity stress in soybean. Bioelectromagnetics 37:455–470
Baghel L, Kataria S, Guruprasad KN (2018) Effect of static magnetic field pretreatment on growth, photosynthetic performance and yield of soybean under water stress. Photosynthetica 56:718–730
Baghel L, Kataria S, Jain M (2019) Mitigation of adverse effects of salt stress on germination, growth, photosynthetic efficiency and yield in maize (Zea mays L.) through magnetopriming. Acta Agrobot 72:1757
Bais F, Luca RM, Bornman JF, Williamson CE et al (2018) Environmental effects of ozone depletion, UV radiation and interactions with climate change: UNEP environmental effects. Photochem Photobiol Sci 17:127–179
Bais AF, Bernhard G, McKenzie RL, Aucamp PJ, Young PJ, Ilyas M, Jockel P, Deushi M (2019) Ozone-climate interactions and effects on solar ultraviolet radiation. Photochem Photobiol Sci 18:602–640
Baker NR, Nogue S, Allen DJ (1997) Photosynthesis and photoinhibition. In: Lumsden P (ed) Plants and UV-B: responses to environmental change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 95–111
Baroniya SS, Kataria S, Pandey GP, Guruprasad KN (2011) Intraspecific variation in sensitivity to ambient ultraviolet-B radiation in growth and yield characteristics of eight soybean cultivars grown under field conditions. Braz J Plant Physiol 23:197–202
Baroniya SS, Kataria S, Pandey GP, Guruprasad KN (2013) Intraspecific variations in antioxidant defense responses and sensitivity of soybean varieties to ambient UV radiation. Acta Physiol Planta 35:1521–1530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-012-1193-6
Baroniya SS, Kataria S, Pandey GP, Guruprasad KN (2014) Growth, photosynthesis and nitrogen metabolism in soybean varieties after exclusion of the UV-B and UV-A/B components of solar radiation. Crop J 2:388–397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2014.08.002
Bhardwaj J, Anand A, Nagarajan S (2012) Biochemical and biophysical changes associated with magnetopriming in germinating cucumber seeds. Plant Physiol Biochem: PPB / Société française de physiologie végétale 57:67–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.05.008
Bischof K, Hanelt D, Wiencke C (2000) Effect of ultraviolet radiation on photosynthesis and related enzyme reactions of marine macroalgae. Planta 211:555–562
Bischof K, Kräbs G, Wiencke C, Hanelt D (2002) Solar ultraviolet radiation affects the activity of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase-oxygenase and the composition of photosynthetic and xanthophyll cycle pigments in the intertidal green alga Ulva lactuca L. Planta 215:502–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-002-0774-9
Bornman JF, Barnes PW, Robson TM, Robinson SA, Jansen MAK, Ballare CL, Flint SD (2019) Linkages between stratospheric ozone, UV radiation and climate change and their implications for terrestrial ecosystems. Photochem Photobiol Sci 18:681–716
Caldwell MM, Flint SD (1994) Stratospheric ozone reduction, solar UV-B radiation and terrestrial ecosystem. Climatic Change 28:375–394
Caldwell MM, Flint SD (1997) Uses of biological spectral weighting functions and the need of scaling for the ozone reduction problem. Plant Ecol 128:66–76
Caldwell MM, Teramura AH, Tevini M, Bornman JF, Bjorn LO, Kulandaivellu G (1995) Effects of increased solar ultraviolet radiation on terrestrial plants. Ambio 24:166–173
Caldwell MM, Bornman JF, Ballare CL, Flint SD, Kulandaivelu G (2007) Terrestrial ecosystems, increased solar ultraviolet radiation, and interactions with other climate change factors. Photochem Photobiol Sci 6:252–266
Camps-Raga B, Gyawali S, Islam NE (2009) Germination rate studies of soybean under static and low-frequency magnetic fields. IEEE Trans Dielectr Electr Insul 16(5):1317–1321. https://doi.org/10.1109/TDEI.2009.5293944
Casal C, Vilchez C, Forjan E, De la Morena BA (2009) The absence of UV-radiation delays the strawberry ripening but increases the final productivity, not altering the main fruit nutritional properties. Acta Hortic 842:159–162
Casati P, Walbot V (2003) Gene expression profiling in response to ultraviolet radiation in maize genotypes with varying flavonoid content. Plant Physiol 132:1739–1754
Chen Y, Zhang X, Guo Q et al (2019) Plant morphology, physiological characteristics, accumulation of secondary metabolites and antioxidant activities of Prunella vulgaris L. under UV solar exclusion. Biol Res 52:17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40659-019-0225-8
Choudhary KK, Agrawal SB (2014) Ultraviolet-B induced changes in morphological, physiological and biochemical parameters of two cultivars of pea (Pisum sativum L.). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 100:178–187
Chouhan S, Chauhan K, Kataria S, Guruprasad KN (2008) Enhancement in leghemoglobin content of root nodules by exclusion of UV-A and UV-B radiation in soybean. J Plant Biol 51:132–138
Çiçek N, Kalajic HM, Ekmekçi Y (2020) Probing the photosynthetic efficiency of some European and Anatolian Scots pine populations under UV-B radiation using polyphasic chlorophyll a fluorescence transient. Photosynthetica 58:468–478
Coleman RS, Day TA (2004) Response of cotton and sorghum to several levels of subambient solar UV-B radiation: a test of the saturation hypothesis. Physiol Plant 122:362–372. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2004.00411.x
Dehariya P, Kataria S, Pandey GP, Guruprasad KN (2011) Assessment of impact of solar UV components on growth and antioxidant enzyme activity in cotton plant. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 17:223–229
Dehariya P, Kataria S, Pandey GP, Guruprasad KN (2012) Photosynthesis and yield in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) var. vikram after exclusion of ambient solar UV-B/A. Acta Physiol Plant 34:1133–1144
Dehariya P, Kataria S, Guruprasad KN, Pandey GP (2018) Saponin synthesis and cotton growth is antagonistically regulated by solar UV-B radiation. J Cotton Res 1:14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42397-018-0014-x
Del Giudice E, Fleischmann M, Preparata G, Talpo G (2002) On the “unreasonable” effects of ELF magnetic fields upon a system of ions. Bioelectromagnetics 23:522–530
Del Valle JC, Buide ML, Whittall JB, Valladares F, Narbona E (2020) UV radiation increases phenolic compound protection but decreases reproduction in Silene littorea. PLoS One 15:e0231611
Derebe AD, Roro AG, Asfaw BT, Ayele WW, Hvoslef-Eide AK (2019) Effects of solar UV-B radiation exclusion on physiology, growth and yields of taro (Colocasia esculenta L.) at different altitudes in tropical environments of Southern Ethiopia. Sci Hortic 256:108563
Dias MC, Pinto DCGA, Freitas H, Santos C, Silva AMS (2020) The antioxidant system in (Olea europaea) to enhanced UV-B radiation also depends on flavonoids and secoiridoids. Phytochemistry 170:112199
Dicarlo AL, Hargis MT, Penafiel LM, Litovitz TA (1999) Short-term magnetic field exposures (60 Hz) induce protection against ultraviolet radiation damage. Int J Radiat Biol 75:1541–1549
Dotto M, Casati P (2017) Developmental reprogramming by UV-B radiation in plants. Plant Sci 264:96–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2017.09.006
Faseela P, Puthur JT (2018) The imprints of the high light and UV-B stresses in Oryza sativa L. ‘Kanchana’ seedlings are differentially modulated. J Photochem Photobiol B 178:551–559
Fatima A, Kataria S, Guruprasad KN, Agrawal AK, Singh B, Sarkar PS, Shripathi T, Kashyap Y, Sinha A (2016) Synchrotron X-ray phase contrast imaging of leaf venation in soybean (Glycine max) after exclusion of solar UV (280–400 nm) radiation. J Synchrotron Radiat 23:795–801
Fatima A, Kataria S, Baghel L, Guruprasad K, Agrawal A, Singh B, Sarkar P, Shripathi T, Kashyap Y (2017) Synchrotron-based phase-sensitive imaging of leaves grown from magneto-primed seeds of soybean. J Synchrotron Radiat 24:232–239
Fatima A, Kataria S, Prajapati S, Jain M, Agrawal AK, Singh B, Kashyap Y, Tripathi DK, Singh VP, Gadre R (2021a) Magnetopriming effects on arsenic stress-induced morphological and physiological variations in soybean involving synchrotron imaging. Physiol Plant 173:88–99
Fatima A, Kataria S, Agrawal AK, Singh B, Kashyap Y, Jain M, Brestic M, Allakhverdiev SI, Rastogi A (2021b) Use of synchrotron phase-sensitive imaging for the investigation of magnetopriming and solar UV-exclusion impact on soybean (Glycine max) leaves. Cells 10:1725. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells10071725
Ferreira MI, Uliana M, Costa SM, Magro M, Vianello F, Ming L, Lima G (2016) Exclusion of solar UV radiation increases the yield of curcuminoid in Curcuma longa L. Ind Crop Prod 89:188–194
Galland P, Pazur A (2005) Magnetoreception in plants. J Plant Res 118:371–389
García-Reina F, Arza-Pascual L (2001) Influence of a stationary magnetic field on water relations in lettuce seeds. I: theoretical considerations. Bioelectromagnetics 22:589–595
Germ M, Kreft I, Osvald J (2005) Influence of UV-B exclusion and selenium treatment on photochemical efficiency of photosystem II, yield and respiratory potential in pumpkins (Cucurbita pepo L.). Plant Physiol Biochem 43:445–448
Guruprasad K, Bhattacharjee S, Kataria S, Yadav S, Tiwari A, Baroniya S, Rajiv A, Mohanty P (2007) Growth enhancement of soybean (Glycine max) upon exclusion of UV-B and UV-A components of solar radiation: characterization of photosynthetic parameters in leaves. Photosynth Res 94:299–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-007-9190-0
Hectors K, Prinsen E, De Coen W, Jansen MAK, Guisez Y (2007) Arabidopsis thaliana plants acclimated to low dose rates of ultraviolet B radiation show specific changes in morphology and gene expression in the absence of stress symptoms. New Phytol 175:255–270
Hideg E, Jansen MAK, Strid A (2013) UV-B exposure, ROS, and stress: inseparable companions or loosely linked associates? Trends Plant Sci 18:107–115
Hollosy F (2002) Effects of ultraviolet radiation on plant cells. Micron 33:179–197
Jain K, Kataria S, Guruprasad KN (2003) Changes in antioxidant defenses of cucumber cotyledons in response to UV-B and the free radical generator compounds AAPH. Plant Sci 165:551–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(03)00214-0
Jain K, Kataria S, Guruprasad KN (2004) Oxyradicals under UV-B stress and their quenching by antioxidants. Indian J Exp Biol 42:884–892
Jenkins GI (2009) Signal transduction in responses to UV-B radiation. Annu Rev Plant Biol 60:407–431
Jordan BR, He J, Chow WS, Anderson JM (1992) Changes in mRNA levels and polypeptide subunits of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase in response to supplemental UV-B radiation. Plant Cell Environ 15:91–98
Kakani VG, Reddy KR, Zhao D, Sailaja K (2003) Field crop responses to ultraviolet B radiation: a review. Agric For Meteorol 120:191–221
Kalaji HM, Rastogi A, Živcak M, Brestic M, Daszkowska-Golec A, Sitko K, Alsharafa KY, Lotfi R, Stypinski P, Samborska IA, Cetner MD (2018) Prompt chlorophyll fluorescence as a tool for crop phenotyping: an example of barley landraces exposed to various abiotic stress factors. Photosynthetica 56:353–361
Kanungo M, Dubey A, Kataria S (2013) Solar UV-B and UV-A/B exclusion affects growth and antioxidant enzymes in cucumber and wheat. Indian J Plant Sci 2:63–72
Kataria S, Guruprasad KN (2012a) Solar UV-B and UV-A/B exclusion effects on intraspecific variations in crop growth and yield of wheat varieties. Field Crop Res 125:8–13
Kataria S, Guruprasad KN (2012b) Intra-specific variations in growth, yield and photosynthesis of sorghum varieties to ambient UV (280-400 nm) radiation. Plant Sci 196:85–92
Kataria S, Guruprasad KN (2014) Exclusion of solar UV components improves growth and performance of Amaranthus tricolor varieties. Sci Hortic 174:36–45
Kataria S, Guruprasad KN (2015) Exclusion of solar UV radiation improves photosynthetic performance and yield of wheat varieties. Plant Physiol Biochem 97:400–411
Kataria S, Jain K, Guruprasad KN (2007) UV-B induced changes in antioxidant enzymes and their isoforms in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) cotyledons. Indian J Biochem Biophys 44:31–37
Kataria S, Guruprasad KN, Ahuja S, Singh B (2013) Enhancement of growth, photosynthetic performance and yield by exclusion of ambient UV components in C3 and C4 plants. Photochem Photobiol B Biol 127:140–152
Kataria S, Jajoo A, Guruprasad KN (2014a) Impact of increasing ultraviolet-B radiation on photosynthetic processes. J Photochem Photobiol B 137:55–66
Kataria S, Baroniya SS, Baghel L, Kanungo M (2014b) Effect of exclusion of solar UV radiation on plants. Plant Sci Today 1:224–232
Kataria S, Baghel L, Guruprasad KN (2015) Effect of seed pre-treatment by magnetic field on the sensitivity of maize seedlings to ambient ultraviolet radiation (280–400 nm). Int J Trop Agric 33:1–7
Kataria S, Baghel L, Guruprasad KN (2017a) Alleviation of adverse effects of ambient UV stress on growth and some potential physiological attributes in soybean (Glycine max) by seed pre-treatment with static magnetic field. J Plant Growth Regul 36:550–565
Kataria S, Baghel L, Guruprasad KN (2017b) Pre-treatment of seeds with static magnetic field improves germination and early growth characteristics under salt stress in maize and soybean. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 10:83–90
Kataria S, Baghel L, Jain M, Guruprasad KN (2019) Magnetopriming regulates antioxidant defense system in soybean against salt stress. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol 18:1878–8181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101090
Kataria S, Rastogi A, Bele A, Jain M (2020a) Role of nitric oxide and reactive oxygen species in static magnetic field pre-treatment induced tolerance to ambient UV-B stress in soybean. Physiol Mol Biol Plant 26:931–945
Kataria S, Jain M, Tripathi DK, Singh VP (2020b) Involvement of nitrate reductase-dependent nitric oxide production in magnetopriming-induced salt tolerance in soybean. Physiol Plant 168:422–436
Kataria S, Jain M, Rastogi A, Brestic M (2021) Static magnetic field treatment enhanced photosynthetic performance in soybean under supplemental ultraviolet-B (280-320 nm) radiation. Photosynth Res 150(1–3):263–278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-021-00850-2
Kittas C, Papaioannou C, Obeid D, Katsoulas N, Tchamitchian M (2006) Effect of two UV-absorbing greenhouse-covering films on growth and yield of an eggplant soil-less crop. Sci Hortic 110:30–37
Krizek DT, Mirecki R (2004) Evidence for phytotoxic effects of cellulose acetate in UV exclusion studies. Environ Exp Bot 51:33–43
Krizek DT, Chalker S (2005) Ultraviolet radiation and terrestrial ecosystems. Photochem Photobiol 81:1021–1025
Liboff AR (1985) Geo-magnetic cyclotron resonance in living cells. Biol Phys 9:99–102
Lingakumar K, Amudha P, Kulandaivelu G (1999) Exclusion of solar UV-B (280–315 nm) radiation on vegetative growth and photosynthetic activities in Vigna unguiculata L. Plant Sci 148:97–103
Mackerness SAH, Surplus SL, Blake P, John CF, Buchanan-Wollaston V, Jordan BR, Thomas B (1999) UV-B induced stress and changes in gene expression in Arabidopsis thaliana: role of signaling pathways controlled by jasmonic acid, ethylene and reactive oxygen species. Plant Cell Environ 22:1413–1423
Margaritondo G (1988) Introduction to synchrotron radiation. Oxford University Press, New York
Margaritondo G, Meuli R (2003) Synchrotron radiation in radiology: novel X-ray sources. Eur Radiol 13:2633–2641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-003-2073-7
Mathur S, Verma RK, Gupta MM et al (2000) Screening of genetic resources of the medicinal-vegetable plant Centella asiatica for herb and asiaticoside yields under shaded and full sunlight conditions. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 75:551–554
Maulidiani H, Khatib A, Shaari K et al (2012) Discrimination of three pegaga (Centella) varieties and determination of growth-lighting effects on metabolites content based on the chemometry of 1H nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J Agric Food Chem 60:410–417
Mazza CA, Batista D, Zima AM, Szwarcberg-Bracchitta M, Giordano CV, Acevedo A, Scopel AL, Ballare CL (1999) The effects of solar UV-B radiation on the growth and yield of barley are accompanied by increased DNA damage and antioxidant responses. Plant Cell Environ 22:61–70
Mohammed AR, Tarpley L (2010) Effects of high night temperature and spikelet position on yield-related parameters of rice (Oryza sativa L.) plants. Eur J Agron 33:117–123
Moussa HR, Khodary SDK (2008) Changes in growth and 14CO2 fixation of Hordeum vulgare and Phaseolus vulgaris induced by UV-B radiation. J Agric Soc Sci 4:59–64
Newman PA, Nash ER, Rosenfield JE (2001) What controls the temperature of the Arctic stratosphere during the spring? J Geophys Res Atmos 106:19999–20010
Nogues S, Baker NR (1995) Evaluation of the role of damage to photosystem II in the inhibition of CO2 assimilation in pea leaves on exposure to UV-B radiation. Plant Cell Environ 18:781–787. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.1995.tb00581.x
Pal M, Sharma A, Abrol YP, Sengupta UK (1997) Exclusion of solar UV-B radiation from normal spectrum on growth of mung bean and maize. Agri Ecol Environ 61:29–34
Pal M, Zaidi PH, Voleti SR, Raj A (2006) Solar UV-B exclusion effect on growth and photosynthetic characteristics of wheat and pea. J New Seeds 8:19–34
Pedro JA, Elina MV, Tania MR, Tarja L (2009) Does supplemental UV-B radiation affect gas exchange and Rubisco activity of Betula pendula Roth. seedlings grown in forest soil under greenhouse conditions? Plant Ecol Divers 2:37–43
Phoenix G, Gwynn-Jones D, Lee J et al (2000) The impacts of UV-B radiation on the regeneration of a sub-arctic heath community. Plant Ecol 146:67–75. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009839506658
Prajapati R, Kataria S, Jain M (2020) Seed priming for alleviation of heavy metal toxicity in plants: an overview. Plant Sci Today 7(3):16. https://doi.org/10.14719/pst.2020.7.3.751
Rácz A, Hideg É, Czégény G (2018) Selective responses of class III plant peroxidase isoforms to environmentally relevant UV-B doses. J Plant Physiol 221:101–106
Raipuria RK, Kataria S, Watts A, Jain M (2021) Magneto-priming promotes nitric oxide via nitric oxide synthase to ameliorate the UV-B stress during germination of soybean seedlings. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol 220:112211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2021.112211
Rinnan R, Keinänen M, Kasurinen A, Asikainen J, Kekki T, Holopainen T, Ro-Poulsen H, Mikkelsen T, Michelsen A (2005) Ambient ultraviolet radiation in the Arctic reduces root biomass and alters microbial community composition but has no effects on microbial biomass. Global Change Biol 11:564–574
Robson TM, Klem K, Urban O, Jansen MA (2015) Re-interpreting plant morphological responses to UV-B radiation. Plant Cell Environ 8:856–866
Roro AG, Terfa MT, Solhaug KA, Tsegaye A, Olsen JE, Torre S (2016) The impact of UV radiation at high altitudes close to the equator on morphology and productivity of pea (Pisum sativum) in different seasons. S Afr J Bot 106:119–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2016.05.011
Rousseaux CM, Flint SD, Searles PS, Caldwell MM (2004) Plant responses to current solar ultraviolet-B radiation and supplemented solar ultraviolet-B radiation simulating ozone depletion: an experimental comparison. Photochem Photobiol 80:224–230
Sarraf M, Kataria S, Taimourya H, Oliveira LS, Menegatti RD, Jain M, Ihtisham M, Liu S (2020) Magnetic field (MF) applications in plants: an overview. Plants 9:1139. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants9091139
Sarraf M, Deamici KM, Taimourya H, Islam KS, Raipuria RK, Abdi G, Brestic M (2021) Effect of magnetopriming on photosynthetic performance of plants. Int J Mol Sci 22:9353. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22179353
Schultze M, Bilger W (2019) Acclimation of Arabidopsis thaliana to low temperature protects against damage of photosystem II caused by exposure to UV-B radiation at 9 °C. Plant Physiol Biochem 134:73–80
Schumaker MA, Bassman JH, Robberecht R, Radamaker GK (1997) Growth, leaf anatomy and physiology of Populus clones in response to solar ultraviolet-B radiation. Tree Physiol 17:617–626
Sharma S, Guruprasad KN (2012) Enhancement of root growth and nitrogen fixation in Trigonella by UV-exclusion from solar radiation. Plant Physiol Biochem 61:97–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.10.003
Sharma S, Kataria S, Joshi J, Guruprasad KN (2019) Antioxidant defense response of fenugreek to solar UV. Int J Veg Sci 25(1):40–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/19315260.2018.1466844
Shine M, Guruprasad K (2012a) Impact of pre-sowing magnetic field exposure of seeds to stationary magnetic field on growth, reactive oxygen species and photosynthesis of maize under field conditions. Acta Physiol Plant 34:255–265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-011-0824-7
Shine MB, Guruprasad KN (2012b) Oxy-radicals and PS II activity in maize leaves in the absence of UV components of solar spectrum. J Biosci 37:703–712
Shine M, Guruprasad K, Anand A (2011) Enhancement of germination, growth, and photosynthesis in soybean by pre-treatment of seeds with magnetic field. Bioelectromagnetics 32:474–484. https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.20656
Shine MB, Guruprasad K, Anand A (2012) Effect of stationary magnetic field strengths of 150 and 200 mT on reactive oxygen species production in soybean. Bioelectromagnetics 33(5):428–437
Singh A (1997) Increased UV-B radiation reduces N2-fixation in tropical leguminous crops. Environ Pollut 95:289–291
Solanki R, Lakshmi N, Rashmi A, Singh BS, Guruprasad KN (2006) Growth and chlorophyll contents as affected by UV-A and UV-B components in cucumber and cotton. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 12:321–323
Suchar VA, Robberecht R (2015) Integration and scaling of UV-B radiation effects on plants: from DNA to leaf. Ecol Evol 5:2544–2555
Teramura AH, Sullivan JH (1994) Effect of UV-B radiation on photosynthesis and growth of terrestrial plants. Photosynth Res 39:463–473
Teramura A, Sullivan J, Lydon J (1990) Effects of UV-B radiation on soybean yield and seed quality: a 6-year field. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., EPA/600/J-90/489 (NTIS PB91196287)
Tian J, Yu J (2009) Changes in ultrastructure and responses of antioxidant systems of algae (Dunaliella salina) during acclimation to enhanced ultraviolet-B radiation. J Trop Agric 33:1–7
Vanhaelewyn L, Van Der Straeten D, De Coninck B, Vandenbussche F (2020) Ultraviolet radiation from a plant perspective: the plant-microorganism context. Front Plant Sci 11:597–642
Wilson MI, Ghosh S, Gerhardt KE, Holland N, Babu TS, Edelman M, Dumbroff EB, Greenberg BM (1995) In vivo photomodification of ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase holoenzyme by ultraviolet-B radiation (formation of a 66-kilodalton variant of the large subunit). Plant Physiol 109:221–229
Yinan Y, Yuan L, Yongqing Y, Chunyang L (2005) Effect of seed pretreatment by magnetic field on the sensitivity of cucumber (Cucumis sativus) seedlings to ultraviolet-B radiation. Environ Exp Bot 54:286–294
Yu GH, Li W, Yuan ZY, Cui HY, Lv CG, Gao ZP, Han B, Gong YZ, Chen GX (2013) The effects of enhanced UV-B radiation on photosynthetic and biochemical activities in super high-yield hybrid rice Liangyoupeijiu at the reproductive stage. Photosynthetica 51:33–44
Zavalla JA, Botto JF (2002) Impact of solar UV-B radiation on seedling emergence, chlorophyll fluorescence, and growth and yield of radish (Raphanus sativus). Funct Plant Biol 29:797–804
Zhang L, Allen LH, Vaughan M, Hauser BA, Boote KJ (2014) Solar ultraviolet radiation exclusion increases soybean internode lengths and plant height. Agric For Meteorol 184:170–178
Zhu PJ, Yang L (2015) Ambient UV-B radiation inhibits the growth and physiology of Brassica napus L. on the Qinghai-Tibetan plateau. Field Crop Res 171:79–85
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kanungo, M., Raipuria, R.K., Fatima, A., Shukla, S., Jain, M., Kataria, S. (2022). Plant Responses: UV-B Avoidance Strategies. In: Kataria, S., Singh, V.P. (eds) UV-B Radiation and Crop Growth. Plant Life and Environment Dynamics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3620-3_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-3620-3_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-19-3619-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-19-3620-3
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)