Abstract
It is well known that there are errors in Ptolemy’s observations of the Sun with consequences for his own astronomy and for later astronomy up to some time in the seventeenth century. The principal problems and their consequences in Ptolemy’s astronomy are the following:
It therefore remains that either Ptolemy committed fraud with fabricated observations, or from a kind of awe and reverence for the ancients preferred to confirm rather than refute them, neither of which is likely in the philosopher Ptolemy, a defender of candor and truth, as is witnessed by many judgments, especially since he could expect no advantage or fame from this, but rather greater advantage and fame from correcting the ancients. But that he was not obsequious to the ancients, he left witnessed in many ways, refuting Hipparchus where it was required.
Johannes Kepler (1937–, 21.1.324).
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Swerdlow, N. (2010). Tycho, Longomontanus, and Kepler on Ptolemy’s Solar Observations and Theory, Precession of the Equinoxes, and Obliquity of the Ecliptic. In: Jones, A. (eds) Ptolemy in Perspective. Archimedes, vol 23. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2788-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2788-7_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-2787-0
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-2788-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawHistory (R0)