Abstract
This paper investigates an approach of decision making internally in an agent where a decision is based on preference and expectation. The approach uses a logic for qualitative decision theory proposed by Boutilier to express such notions. To make readily use of this we describe a simple method for generating preference and expectation models that respect certain rules provided by the agents, and we briefly discuss how to integrate the approach into an existing agent programming language.
Access provided by Autonomous University of Puebla. Download to read the full chapter text
Chapter PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alchourrón, C.E., Gärdenfors, P., Makinson, D.: On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions. The Journal of Symbolic Logic 50(2), 510–530 (1985)
Alechina, N., Dastani, M., Logan, B.: Programming Norm-Aware Agents. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2012, vol. 2, pp. 1057–1064. International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland (2012)
Alechina, N., Jago, M., Logan, B.: Resource-bounded belief revision and contraction. In: Baldoni, M., Endriss, U., Omicini, A., Torroni, P. (eds.) DALT 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3904, pp. 141–154. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Boutilier, C.: Toward a Logic for Qualitative Decision Theory. In: Proceedings of the KR 1994, pp. 75–86. Morgan Kaufmann (1994)
Broersen, J., Dastani, M., Hulstijn, J., Huang, Z., Torre, L.v.d.: The BOID Architecture – Conflicts Between Beliefs, Obligations, Intentions and Desires. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Autonomous Agents, pp. 9–16. ACM Press (2001)
Dastani, M., Dignum, V., Dignum, F.: Role-assignment in open agent societies. In: Proceedings of the Second International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2003, pp. 489–496. ACM, New York (2003)
Dignum, F., Morley, D., Sonenberg, E.A., Cavedon, L.: Towards Socially Sophisticated BDI Agents. In: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on MultiAgent Systems (ICMAS 2000), pp. 111–118. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2000)
Dignum, F., Kinny, D., Sonenberg, L.: From Desires, Obligations and Norms to Goals. Cognitive Science Quarterly 2 (2002)
Hindriks, K.V.: Programming Rational Agents in GOAL. Multi-Agent Programming: Languages, Tools and Applications 2, 119–157 (2009)
van der Torre, L., Tan, Y.H.: Contrary-to-duty reasoning with preference-based dyadic obligations. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 27(1-4), 49–78 (1999)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Jensen, A.S. (2013). Deciding between Conflicting Influences. In: Cossentino, M., El Fallah Seghrouchni, A., Winikoff, M. (eds) Engineering Multi-Agent Systems. EMAS 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8245. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45343-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45343-4_8
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-45342-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-45343-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)